Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance

Technical Memorandum

Annex 8

ANNEX 8 : CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING ECOLOGICAL IMPACT

Ecological impact refers to the effect on a habitat or species due to direct or indirect changes in the environment brought about by a project. Besides magnitude and scale, the significance of an ecological impact is also related to the asserted importance of the habitat or species to be affected. In general, the impact on an important habitat or species will be more significant in comparison to other less important ones.

2. The following are some general criteria that can be used for evaluation of the significance of an ecological impact and the ecological importance of a site/habitat or a species. These criteria are not exhaustive and may carry different weight in different cases.

Table (1) Evaluating the significance of an ecological impact
 

Criteria Remarks
Habitat quality The impact will be more significant if ecologically important habitats are affected. The criteria used for evaluating the ecological importance of a site / habitat are shown in Table (2). Examples of habitat types that are considered as important in the territory are listed in Note below.
Species The impact will be more significant if ecologically important species are affected. The criteria used for evaluating the ecological importance of a species are shown in Table (3).
Size/Abundance The impact will be greater if larger area of a habitat or greater numbers of organisms are affected. (e.g. The impact of indiscriminate clearance of woodland is more severe than that of selective felling of trees at the same site.)
Duration Long term impacts are usually more significant than short term ones.
Reversibility Permanent and irreversible impacts are usually more significant than temporary and reversible ones.
Magnitude Usually the greater the magnitude of the environmental changes (e.g. increase in pollution loads, decrease in food supply), the more significant is the impact.

Note : Important habitat types in the territory

  1. mature native woodland larger than one hectare
  2. undisturbed natural coastal area larger than one hectare or longer than 500 metres in linear measurement
  3. intertidal mudflats larger than one hectare
  4. established mangrove stands of any size
  5. brackish or freshwater marshes larger than one hectare
  6. established seagrass bed of any size
  7. natural stream courses and rivers longer than 500 metres
  8. established coral communities of any size
  9. other habitats found to have special conservation importance by documented scientific studies

Table (2) Evaluating a site / habitat
 

Criteria Remarks
Naturalness Truly natural habitats (i.e. not modified by man) are usually highly valued. However, most areas of the territory have been modified. Generally, those habitats less modified will tend to be rated higher.
Size In general larger area of habitat(s) shall be more valuable than smaller ones, all else being equal.
Diversity The more diverse the species assemblages and communities of a site, the higher is its conservation value.
Rarity Rarity can apply to habitats as well as species. The presence of one or more rare habitats and species will give a site higher value than those without rarity.
Re-creatability Habitats which are difficult to be re-created naturally or artificially are usually valued higher.
Fragmentation In general, the more fragmented habitat, the lower is its value.
Ecological linkage The value of a habitat increases if it lies in close proximity and/or links functionally to a highly valued habitat of any type.
Potential value Certain sites, through appropriate management or natural processes, may eventually develop a nature conservation interest substantially greater than that existing at present. Factors limiting such potential being achieved shall be noted.
Nursery/breeding ground Such areas are very important for the regeneration and long term survival of many organisms and their populations
Age Ancient natural or semi-natural habitats are normally highly valued. For some habitats such as woodlands, older ones are normally valued much higher than recent ones.
Abundance/Richness of wildlife In general sites supporting more wildlife will be rated higher.

Table (3) Evaluating species found within a site / habitat
 

Criteria Remarks
Protection status Species listed under local legislation and international conventions for conservation of wildlife shall be given special attention. References shall also be made to those protected by law in China, especially Guangdong Province.
Distribution Species with restricted distribution (locally or regionally) will be rated higher than those more widespread ones. More weight shall be given to species which are endemic to Hong Kong or South China.
Rarity Normally the rarer the species, the more value it has. However care shall be taken in assessing exotic weeds, escaped cultivars or captive species, vagrants and introduced species which have lower value.

Greater weight shall be given to those which are internationally rare, then to regionally rare (within South China) and finally locally (within Hong Kong) rare species. Reference could be made to Red Data Books and species lists of international conventions for conservation of wildlife.

Back