AGREEMENT NO. EA990008
SHEUNG SHUI TO LOK MA CHAU SPUR
LINE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
REPORT
380433/BBV/910 Issue 4
VOLUME 1 & 2 OF 3 – ASSESSMENT REPORT
|
Binnie
Black & Veatch Hong Kong Limited 11/F,
New Town Tower Pak
Hok Ting Street Shatin New
Territories |
Kowloon-Canton
Railway Corporation Capital
Projects Planning Department No.
9 Lok King Street Fo
Tan, Shatin New
Territories |
|
|
|
|
|
June
2000 |
CONTENTS
1.
INTRODUCTION
2.
CONSTRAINTS
AND OPPORTUNITIES
5.
LANDSCAPE
AND VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
6.
WATER
QUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT
9.
CONTAMINATED
LAND ASSESSMENT
10.
FISHERIES
IMPACT ASSESSMENT
11.
CULTURAL
HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
AGREEMENT NO. EA990008
SHEUNG SHUI TO LOK MA CHAU SPUR
LINE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
REPORT
380433/BBV/910
Issue 4
VOLUME 3 OF 3 – APPENDICES
|
Binnie
Black & Veatch Hong Kong Limited 11/F,
New Town Tower Pak
Hok Ting Street Shatin New
Territories |
Kowloon-Canton
Railway Corporation Capital
Projects Planning Department No.
9 Lok King Street Fo
Tan, Shatin New
Territories |
|
|
|
|
|
June
2000 |
APPENDICES
Appendix 1
Comparison of Environmental Impacts for KCRC Alignment and River Beas
Route
Appendix A
Environmental Legislation and Planning Guidelines
Appendix B
Construction Noise Calculations
Appendix
C Direct
Wayside Noise Model
Appendix
D Equations
and Assumptions adopted in the Prediction of Railway Noise Impact and Sample
Calculation for NSR 13-2
Appendix
E Unmitigated
and Mitigated Noise Levels for Spur Line Operation
Appendix
F Description
of Habitats occurring within 500 m of the Spur Line Alignment (from ERM 1999)
Appendix
G Counts
of Waterfowl Species of Conservation Concern in Fishponds in the San Tin / Lok
Ma Chau Area of the Deep Bay Wetland Conservation Area
Appendix
H Notes
relating to the Assessment of the Impacts of Disturbance on Individual Species
Appendix
I Assessment
of Potential Ecological Impacts on Habitats and Species of Conservation
Concern from the Construction of the Spur Line
Appendix
J Assessment
of Potential Ecological Impacts on Habitats and Species of Conservation
Importance from the Operation of the Spur Line
Appendix K
Contaminated Land Site Survey Details
Appendix L
Glossary for Fisheries Impact Assessment
Appendix M
EM&A Action Plans
TABLES
Table 1.1 Environmental
Issues Addressed in this EIA Report
Table
2.1 Comparison of Environmental Impacts
Related to Vertical Alignment Options
Table 2.2 Comparison of Vertical Alignment Selection within Engineering Constraints
Table
2.3 Summary of Environmental Impacts
Comparison between KCRC Alignment and River Beas Route
Table
3.1 Details of Representative Noise
Sensitive Receivers
Table
3.2 Concurrent Construction Activities
under this Project Considered for Cumulative Construction Noise Impact
Table
3.3 Comparison of Unmitigated and
Mitigated Predicted Noise Levels with Noise Criteria for RNSRs Potentially
Affected by Construction Noise.
Table
3.4 RNSRs Potentially Affected by
Construction Noise
Table
3.5 Representative Noise Sensitive
Receivers Affected by Residual Impact
Table 3.6 Data of RNSRs Worst Affected by the Fixed Noise Sources Planned under the Spur Line Project
Table 3.7 Designed Noise Limits for Each Group of Planned Fixed Sources
Table 3.8 Offsets Adopted in Estimating Noise Source Location
Table
3.9 Attention Provided by Single Plenum
System
Table
3.10 Comparison of the Unmitigated Noise
Levels for Railway Operation between 0700 – 2300 and the Noise Assessment
Table 3.12 Comparison of the Unmitigated Lmax Levels with Noise Assessment Criteria for Lmax
Table
3.13 Comparison of the Unmitigated Noise
Levels for Railway Operation between 0700 – 2300 and the Noise Assessment
Criteria
Table
3.14 Comparison of the Mitigated Noise
Levels for Railway Operation between 2300 – 0700 hours and the Noise
Assessment Criteria
Table
3.15 Comparison of Mitigated Lmax Levels
for Railway Operation between 2300 – 0700 hours with Noise Assessment
Criterion
Table 3.16 Calculation of the Maximum Noise Impact on Receivers located in high rise residential towers located at the minimum setback of 10 m outside the Railway Reserve
Table
3.17 Summary of Cumulative Noise Levels
arising from Spur Line and existing East Rail Train Operation
Table
4.1 Coverage of Different Habitat Types
within the Study Corridor
Table
4.2 Species of Conservation Importance
that are known or likely to occur in Significant numbers within 500 m of
the Proposed Route between Sheung Shui Station and Lok Ma Chau Station
Table
4.3 The Location, Larval Food Plant and
Status in Hong Kong of Butterfly Species of Conservation Importance
Table
4.4 Species of Conservation Importance
occurring within 500 m of the Spur Line and their Distribution with the
Study Area (Source: Adapted from ERM 1999)
Table
4.5 Species of Conservation Importance
occurring within 500 m of the Spur Line and their Distribution with
Respect to Habitat Type (Source: Adapted from ERM 1999)
Table
4.6 Ecological Evaluation of Fung-shui
Forests within the Study Area
Table
4.7 Ecological Evaluation of Lowland
Secondary Forest
Table
4.8 Ecological Evaluation of Plantation
Forest
Table
4.9 Ecological Evaluation of Orchard
Table
4.10 Ecological Evaluation of Wet
Agricultural Land
Table
4.11 Ecological Evaluation of Dry
Agricultural Land
Table
4.12 Ecological Evaluation of Inactive
Agricultural Land
Table
4.13 Ecological Evaluation of Active
Fishponds
Table
4.14 Ecological Evaluation of Inactive
Fishponds
Table
4.15 Ecological Evaluation of Ponds
Table
4.16 Ecological Evaluation of Marsh
Table
4.17 Ecological Evaluation of Water
Course
Table
4.18 Grassland-Shrubland Mosaic
Table
4.19 Ecological Evaluation of Wasteland
Table
4.21 Summary of Habitat Evaluations
Table
4.22 Long-term Estimated Direct Habitat
Loss as a Result of the Construction of the Spur Line
Table
4.23 Predicted Disturbance Impacts from
the Construction and Operation of the Railway and Station on Regularly
occurring Species of Conservation Importance
Table
4.24 Initial Assessment of Potential
Ecological impacts on Forest Habitats from the Construction of the Spur Line
Table
4.25 Initial Assessment of Potential
Ecological Impacts on Agricultural Habitats from the Construction of the Spur
Line
Table
4.26 Initial Assessment of Potential
Ecological Impacts on Fishpond and Pound Habitats from the Construction of the
Spur Line
Table
4.27 Initial Assessment of Potential
Ecological Impacts on Marsh Habitats from the Construction of the Spur Line
Table
4.28 Initial Assessment of Potential
Ecological Impacts on Forest Habitats from the operation of the Spur Line
Table
4.29 Initial Assessment of Potential
Ecological Impacts on Agricultural Habitats from the Operation of the Spur
Line
Table
4.30 Initial Assessment of Potential
Ecological Impacts on Fishpond and Pond Habitats from the Operation of the
Spur Line
Table
4.31 Initial Assessment of Potential
Ecological Impacts on Marsh Habitats from the Operation of the Spur Line
Table
4.32 Land Requirement to Compensate for
Habitat Loss for Large Waterbirds
Table
4.33 Land Requirement for Compensatory
Habitat Provision and Other Creation of Habitats of Ecological Value
Table
4.34 The Overall Levels of Compensation
Predicted from Compensation Measures for Species of Conservation Importance
that Regularly occur or have the Potential to Regularly occur in the San Tin/Lok
Ma Chau Fishpond Area
Table
4.35 Proposed Mitigation Measures and
Predicted Residual Impacts
Table
4.36 Land requirement for compensatory
habitat provision and other creation of habitats of ecological value
Table
4.37 The overall levels of compensation
predicted from compensation measures for Species of Conservation Importance
that regularly occur or have the potential to regularly occur in the San Tin /
Lok Ma Chau fishpond area
Table
4.38 Land requirement to compensate for
habitat loss for Long Valley species sensitive to disturbance
Table
4.39 Land requirement for compensatory
habitat provision and other creation of habitats of ecological value
Table
4.40 Summary of habitat requirements for
target Species of Conservation Importance
Table
4.41 Water Budget for each Mitigation
Area within Long Valley
Table
4.42 Plant species to be used for marshland habitat creation at the temporary
mitigation area
Table
4.43 Summary of habitat requirements of
target Species of Conservation Importance
Table
4.44 The overall levels of compensation predicted from compensation measures
for Species of Conservation Importance that regularly occur or have the
potential to regularly occur in the Long Valley area
Table
4.45 Proposed mitigation measures and
predicted residual impacts
Table
5.1 Existing Landscape Resources and
Predicted Impacts
Table
5.2 Existing Landscape Character and
Landscape Impacts
Table
5.3 Review of Existing Planning and
Development Control Framework
Table
5.4 Visually Sensitive Receivers and
Visual Impacts
Table
5.5 Summary of Operational (Residual)
Impact on Landscape Resources and Landscape Mitigation Measures
Table
5.6 Summary of Landscape Mitigation
Measures and Operational (Residual) Impacts
Table
5.7 Summary of Mitigation Measures and
Operational Visual (Residual) Impacts
Table
5.8 Provisional Programme for Landscape
Works
Table
5.9 Implementation, Management and
Maintenance of the Landscape Works
Table
5.10 Summary of Impact on Existing Landscape Resources
Table
5.11 Summary of Landscape and Visual Impacts
Table
6.1 Summary water quality data for River
Beas during recent years (EPD River 1995, 1996, 1997)
Table
6.2 Summary water quality data for River
Indus during recent years (EPD River 1995, 1996, 1997)
Table
6.3 Sediment quality in River Beas (Maunsell
1997)
Table
6.4 Elutriate test results for sediment
from River Beas (Maunsell 1997)
Table 6.5 Field Observations at Water Courses in Kwu Tong and Chau Tau areas
Table
6.6 Water quality in water courses and
unmanaged ponds alongside Lok Ma Chau Boundary Crossing (Binnie 1999)
Table
6.7 Sediment Quality in unmanaged ponds
alongside Lok Ma Chau Boundary Crossing (Binnie 1999)
Table
6.8 Water quality data for Shenzhen River
(high and low water levels) in dry season of 1994 (ERM 1999)
Table
6.9 Sediment quality data for Shenzhen
River (Shenzhen River Regulation Project, reported in ERM, 1999)
Table
6.10 Elutriate test results for sediment
from Shenzhen River (ERM 1999)
Table
6.11 Monitoring Results from Inner Deep
Bay in Recent Years (EPD Marine 1995, 1996, 1997)
Table
6.12 Monitoring Results from Outer Zone
of Deep Bay in Recent Years (EPD Marine 1995, 1996, 1997)
Table
6.13 Metal Concentrations in Sediment in
EPD Monitoring Locations in Deep Bay (EPD Marine 1995, 1996, 1997)
Table 6.14
Summary of Major Projects Adjacent to the Spur Line
Table
6.15 Summary of Construction Activities
and Potential Impacts
Table 6.16
Summary of Type of Pollutants in Runoff from Railway Lines
Table 6.17
Daily Volume and Construction of Sewage Generated at Lok Ma Chau
Station
Table 6.18
Discharge Standards for Effluents Discharged into Group B Inland Waters
Table 6.19
Summary of Mitigation Measures for Construction Impacts
Table 7.1 Hong
Kong Air Quality Objectives (AQOs)
Table 7.2 Representative
Air Sensitive Receivers
Table 7.3 Air
Pollutants Concentrations at Yuen Long EPD Station (1997)
Table 7.4 Air
Pollutants Concentrations at Tai Po EPD Station (1997)
Table 7.5 Material Quantities for the Spur Line
Table 8.1 Materials
Quantities for the Spur Line
Table
8.2 Construction Wastes Arising as a
Result of Proposed Works
Table 8.3 Construction Waste types
and their potential for recycling or re-use
Table
8.4 Responsibilities for waste
collection, recycling and disposal during the Construction Phase
Table
8.5 Summary of Potential Waste Types and
Disposal Options during Operational Phase
Table
9.1 Lot Numbers, Assigned Letters and
Elevation
Table
9.2 Findings of Desktop Study & Site
Visits and the likely Potential for Contamination
Table
9.3 Criteria for Adoption of Full-scale
or Simplified Site Investigation
Table
9.4 Lots along the Spur Line and
Potential Contaminating Landuses
Table
9.5 Activities found along the Spur Line
and their likely associated contaminants
Table
9.6 Number of “Hot Spot” Samples and
Sampling Methods at Each of the Potential Contaminated Land Sites
Table
9.7 Grid Sampling to be conducted if
“Hot Spot” Sample Indicates the Presence of Contamination
Table
9.8 Detection Limits of Parameters to be
analysed
Table
9.9 Remediation techniques which could be
used at sites along the Spur Line
Table
9.10 Main Activities at Each Site,
Contaminants Likely to be Present and Possible Extent of Contamination
Table
10.1 Area and Percentage Coverage of
Ecological Habitats within the Study Corridor Including Values for Active and
Inactive Fish Ponds
Table 10.2 Common Vegetation
Frequently found Growing on Bunds of Fish Ponds
Table
10.3 Total Area of Fish Ponds in Hong
Kong
Table
10.4 Species of Fish Commonly Reared in
Poly Culture and Mono Culture Fish Ponds
Table
10.5 Recommended Water Quality Standard
for Refilling Fish Ponds
Table 10.6 Countries
from which Fish Fry and Fingerlings are Imported
Table
10.7 Feed Types Added to Polyculture Fish
Ponds
Table
10.8 Production Period and Typical Market
Size of Fish Reared in Polyculture Systems
Table
10.9 Species of Trash Fish that are
Commonly Found in Fish Ponds
Table 10.10 Summary of the
Potential Financial Loss per Hectare due to Predation by Birds
Table
11.1 Summary of the archaeological findings in each evaluation unit
Table 11.2 Distance, orientation
and existing landscapes between the villages and the proposed alignment
Table
11.3 Distance, orientation and
development between AMO listed historical buildings and the proposed alignment
Table
11.4 Summary of Potential Impacts on Fung
Shui
Table
12.1 Proposed Monitoring Locations for
Water Quality during Construction of Spur Line
Table
12.2 Recommended Frequencies for
Monitoring Water Quality
Table 12.3 Implementation
Schedule
FIGURES
2.1 Horizontal
Alignment of Spur Line and the Study Area of Ecological Assessment
2.2
Vertical Alignment of Spur Line showing
Locations of Viaduct Sections, Cutting, Embankments, Local Roads, Raw Water
Mains, and CLP 400kV Overhead Line
2.3
KCRC Alignment and Route Studies
2.4
a KCRC Alignment and Route Studies
with Po Shek Wu Road
2.4
b KCRC Alignment and Route Studies with Po Shek Wu Road
2.5
Northern Route
2.6
Part of River Beas Route at Sheung Shui End
2.7
Southern Route 1
2.8
Part Plan of Southern Route 1 & 2 Showing
Proximity of Village House in Long Valley
2.9
Locations of Alternative Alignment Considered
under the PPFS with the Environmentally Preferred Alignment Highlighted
3.1
Locations
of Representative Noise Sensitive Receivers and Future Land Use Stipulated
under Latest Outline Zoning Plans
3.2
Proposed Kwu Tung North Strategic Growth Area
4.1
Ecological habitats within 500 m of the Study Area of the Spur Line
4.2
Sites of Conservation Importance
4.3
Habitat impacted by existing disturbance additional to the proposed Lok
Ma Chau station and viaduct section to Chau Tau
4.4
Habitat impacted by existing disturbance additional to Spur Line
viaduct in Long Valley
4.5 Area of Proposed Ecological Compensation Measures within Lok Ma Chau
4.6
Plan of Fishpond Area for Ecological Mitigation
4.7
Cross-section
through Fishpond Area for Ecological Mitigation
4.8
Plan
of Marsh and Reedbed Area around Lok Ma Chau Station
4.9
Cross
section through Marsh and Reedbed Area around Lok Ma Chau Station
4.10
Plan
of Construction Mitigation Area for Impacts to Long Valley Marsh
4.11
Cross-section
through Construction Mitigation Area
4.12 Meanders along River Beas to be enhanced for ecological mitigation of
lost habitat under Spur Line Project
4.13
Mitigation proposed for Meander 1
4.14
Mitigation
proposed for Meander 2
4.15
Mitigation
proposed for Meander 2A
4.16
Cross-section
through shallow water section of Meander 2A
4.17a b
c Plan of Ecological Compensation Area below
Spur Line viaduct within Long Valley
4.18
Cross-section
through mitigation area beneath viaduct
4.19
Longitudinal
section through mitigation area beneath viaduct
5.1 Location Plan
5.3
a b c
Landscape Character and Quality Assessment
5.4
a b c
Landscape Planning Review
5.6
a b c
Visual Impact Assessment
5.7
a b c
d e f
g h i
j k l
m n o
Landscape Mitigation Proposals
5.9 Photomontage Location plan
5.10a Photomontages
showing view from Lok Ma Chau Lookout Point towards the proposed Terminus
Building
5.10b Photomontages
showing view from Lok Ma Chau Lookout Point towards the proposed Terminus
Building
5.10c Photomontages
showing view from Chau Tau south towards Ki Lung Shan
5.10d Photomontages
showing view from Chau Tau south towards Ki Lung Shan
5.10e Photomontages
showing view from Yan Shau Wai north west towards the proposed Terminus
Building
5.10f Photomontages
showing view from Yan Shau Wai north west towards the proposed Terminus
Building
5.10g Photomontages
showing view from Tong Kok looking south towards the Fanling Highway
5.10h Photomontages
showing view from Tong Kok looking south towards the Fanling Highway
5.10i Photomontages
showing view from Temple at Ho Sheung Heung south east towards Long Valley
5.10j Photomontages
showing view from Temple at Ho Sheung Heung south east towards Long Valley
5.10k Photomontages
showing view from Yin Kong north towards Long Valley
5.10l Photomontages
showing view from Yin Kong north towards Long Valley
5.10m Photomontages
showing view from Tsung Pak Long north towards Long Valley
5.10n Photomontages
showing view from Tsung Pak Long north towards Long Valley
5.10o Photomontages
showing view from Pedestrian Footbridge over KCR line to Lo Wu looking south
5.10p Photomontages
showing view from Pedestrian Footbridge over KCR line to Lo Wu looking south
5.10q Photomontages
showing view from hill south of Europa Garden Phase I Development
5.10r Photomontages
showing view from hill south of Europa Garden Phase I Development
5.10s Photomontages
showing view north Kwu Tung South Market
5.10t Photomontages
showing view north Kwu Tung South Market
5.10u View
from San Wan Road below Po Shek Wu Bridge looking south west
5.10v View
from San Wan Road below Po Shek Wu Bridge looking south west
5.10w View
from the 14th floor of Choi Ping House looking north over Sheung Shui
5.10x View
from the 14th floor of Choi Ping House looking north over Sheung Shui
6.1 Water Sensitive Receivers and Major Concurrent Project
6.2
EPD Marine Water and Sediment Quality Monitoring
Stations in Deep Bay
6.3
Location of Reedbed Proposed for Effluent
Polishing
6.4
Plan of Reedbed area for Effluent Polishing
6.5
Proposed Cross-section for Reedbed Area for Effluent Polishing
7.1
Computer Simulation of the Topographic Features
surrounding the Deep Bay Air Shed
7.2
Wind Rose of Lau Fau Shan Station
7.3
Wind Rose of Ta Kwu Ling Station
9.1
9.2 9.3
Sites Identified as Having Potentially Contaminated Land
9.4-9.6
Proposed Boreholes and Trial Pits for the Contamination Assessment Plan
(CAP)
9.7a-j
Grid Sampling Locations
10.1
Ecological Habitats within the Study Area
10.2 Ecological Sensitive Areas around the Study Area
10.3 Simplified
Annual Management Regime of Commercial Fish Pond Management employed in Hong
Kong
10.4 Breakdown
of Costs and Associated Profits from the Management of Fish Ponds in the Lok
Ma Chau Area
11.1a
b Horizontal Alignment of Spur Line
and The Study Area of Cultural Heritage Assessment
11.2 Map
Illustrating potential impacts on Fung Shui Features
11.3 Auger
hole locations in Unit 1 (1:1000)
11.4 Test
Pit #4 and auger hole locations in Unit 2 (1:1000)
11.5 Test
Pit #2 and auger hole locations in Unit 3 (1:1000)
11.6 Test
Pit #2 and auger hole locations in Unit 4 (1:1000)
11.7 Unit
5. Auger holes 1-7 (1:1000)
11.8 Unit
5. Auger holes 8-14 (1:1000)
11.9 Unit
6. Auger holes 3-16 (1:1000)
11.10 Unit
6. Auger holes 1-2; 7-8 and Test Pit #5 (1:1000)
11.11 Test
Pit #1 and auger hole locations in Unit 7 (1:1000)
11.12 Unit
8. Auger holes 1-10 (1:1000)
11.13 Unit
9. Auger holes 1-4 (1:1000)
11.14 Map
showing the locations of the Cultural Heritage resources in Pun Uk Tsuen
(1:1000)
11.15 Map
showing location of Lok Ma Chau Police Station (1:1000)
11.16 Map
showing the locations of the cultural Heritage resources in Chau Tau (1:1000)
11.17 Map
showing the locations of the Cultural Heritage Resources in Yin Kong (1:1000)
11.18 Map
showing the locations of the Cultural Heritage Resources in Tai Tau Leng
(1:1000)
11.19 Map
showing the locations of Cultural Heritage resources in Tsung Pak Long
(1:1000)
11.20 Map
showing the location of Hakka Wai, Tsung Pak Long (1:1000)
11.21 Map
showing the location of the Cultural Heritage resources in Ho Sheung Heung
(1:1000)
11.22 Map
showing the location of the Sin Wai Nunnery, Ho Sheung Heung (1:1000)
11.23 Map
showing the location of the Cultural Heritage resources in Kwu Tong (1:1000)
11.24 Map
showing the locations of the Cultural Heritage Resources in Mun Hau Tsuen and
Tai Yuen Tsuen (1:1000)
11.25 Map
showing the locations of Cultural Heritage Resources in Po Sheung Tsuen and
Hing Yan Tsuen (1:1000)
11.26 Map
showing the locations of the Cultural Heritage Resources in Wai Loi Tsuen
(1:1000)
11.27 Map
showing the locations of the Cultural Heritage Resources Tung Chan Wai and Yan
Shau Wai (1:1000)
11.28 Map
showing the locations of the Man Lung Fung Ancestral Hall, the Man Shui Yeh
Ancestral Hall, the Ming Yuen Tong Ancestral Hall and the Ming Tak Tong
Ancestral Hall, San Tin (1:1000)
11.29 Map
showing the location of Tai Fu Tai Mansion, San Tin (1:1000)
11.30 Map
showing the location of the Lady Ho Tung Welfare Centre, Kwu Tong South
(1:1000)
12.1 Water Quality Monitoring Locations for EM&A
A1.1 Wetland
Conservation Area (WCA) and Wetland Buffer Area (WBA) Boundaries
C.1 Wayside
Noise Modelling – Details of Single Viaduct Model
C.2 Wayside
Noise Modelling – Details of Twin Viaduct Model
C.3 Wayside
Noise Modelling – Geometry Model of Train Compartment
C.4 Wayside
Noise Modelling – Geometry Model for Calibration (including Omnidirectional
Sources)
C.5 Wayside
Noise Modelling – Model Calibration : A-weighted Spectrum; Calibrated to
Reference Noise Level Lmax 86 dB(A) at 25 m Setback from Nearest
Track Centreline for a Train Passby at Speed of 100 km/hr
C.6 Wayside
Noise Modelling – Single Viaduct Model : Geometry Model
C.7 Wayside
Noise Modelling – Single Viaduct Model : Predicted Noise Level (A-weighted
Spectrum) for the Inboard and Outboard Side
C.8 Wayside
Noise Modelling – Twin Viaduct One Car Model : Geometry Model
C.9 Wayside
Noise Modelling – Twin Viaduct One Car Model : Predicted Noise Levels
(A-weighted Spectrum) for the Inboard and Outboard Side
C.10 Wayside
Noise Modelling – Twin Viaduct Two Car Model : Geometry Model
C.11 Wayside
Noise Modelling – Twin Viaduct Two Car Model : Predicted Noise Levels
(A-weighted Spectrum) for the Inboard and Outboard Side
C.12 Wayside
Reference Noise Spectrum
E.1 Total
Wayside Noise Measured Adjacent to the Tsing Yi Viaducts during passbys of the
MTRC Airport Express - Adjusted to 130 kph and 25 m setback level
with top of rail
E.2 Total
Wayside Noise Measured Adjacent to the Tsing Yi Viaducts during passbys of the
MTRC Airport Express - adjusted to 130 kph and 25 m setback
E.3 Comparison
of Measured total Wayside Noise and Structure Radiated Noise determined from
Vibration Measurements taken on the Noise Radiating surfaces of the Viaduct -
adjusted to 130 kph and 25 m setback
E.4 Structure
Radiated Noise from Viaducts with LVT installed - 25 m setback
PLATES
9.1-9.32
Photos showing Potentially Contaminated Land