Sewerage Catchment Area
Table 6.1 Ultimate Population in Year 2016 for TKO Sewerage Catchment in Baseline Condition
Residential
Population |
Commercial
Employed Population |
Industrial
Employed Population |
School
Place |
Diversion
from Port Shelter* |
484,318 |
99,629 |
10,716 |
69,511 |
35,348 |
Notes: * Design ultimate population is based on Table B of the SENT Development Strategy Review Study provided by EPD’s memo to TDD ref. (22) in EP 2/N8.Q/84 XII dated 16 June 2003.
Sewerage Impact Assessment Condition
Table 6.2 Proposed Changes in Population at TCS, TKL and PSK in Year 2016
Development Area |
Planning Area |
Baseline
Condition |
SIA Condition |
Change in
Percentage |
Change in Population |
||||||||
Residential |
School Place |
Employment |
Residential |
School Place |
Employment* |
Residential |
School Place |
Employment* |
Residential |
School Place |
Employment* |
||
Town Centre
South |
65 |
37,032 |
5,730 |
2,750 |
15,656 |
3,240 |
2,750 |
-58% |
-43% |
0% |
-21,376 |
-2,490 |
0 |
66 |
4,108 |
1,316 |
2,548 |
10,774 |
0 |
2,548 |
+162% |
-100% |
0% |
+6,666 |
-1,316 |
0 |
|
67 |
14,030 |
2,912 |
2,558 |
0 |
3,870 |
2,558 |
-100% |
+33% |
0% |
-14,030 |
+958 |
0 |
|
68 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
6,323 |
0 |
30 |
N/A |
0% |
0% |
+6,323 |
0 |
0 |
|
Sub-total |
55,170 |
9,958 |
7,886 |
32,753 |
7,110 |
7,886 |
-41% |
-29% |
0% |
-22,417 |
-2,848 |
0 |
|
Tiu Keng Leng |
73 |
36,010 |
5,948 |
3,931 |
33,184 |
5,555 |
3,931 |
-8% |
-7% |
0% |
-2,826 |
-393 |
0 |
74 |
26,259 |
989 |
3,931 |
14,850 |
2,580 |
3,931 |
-43% |
+161% |
0% |
-11,409 |
+1,591 |
0 |
|
Sub-total |
62,269 |
6,937 |
7,862 |
48,034 |
8,135 |
7,862 |
-23% |
+17% |
0% |
-14,235 |
+1,198 |
0 |
|
Pak Shing Kok |
78 |
2,157 |
335 |
297 |
5,245 |
335 |
297 |
+143% |
0% |
0% |
+3,088 |
0 |
0 |
Notes:
·
* - Assuming the employment within the development areas under the SIA
Condition remains unchanged from the Baseline Condition for conservatism.
·
“+” and “-” signs indicate elevation and depletion against the baseline
line values, respectively.
·
N/A denotes Not Applicable.
Table 6.3 Ultimate Population in Year 2016 associated with Further Development proposed at TCS, TKL and PSK for TKO Sewerage Catchment
Residential
Population |
Commercial
Employed Population (E2
to E5) |
Industrial
Employed Population (E1) |
School Place |
Diversion
from Port Shelter* |
450,838 |
99,709 |
10,716 |
67,861 |
35,348 |
Notes: * Design ultimate population is based on Table B of the SENT Development Strategy Review Study provided by EPD’s memo to TDD ref. (22) in EP 2/N8.Q/84 XII dated 16 June 2003.
Table 6.4 Recommended Unit Flow Factors
Development Type |
Unit |
Unit Flow Factor
(l/h/d) |
Residential |
|
|
Low Cost Rental |
person |
175 |
R1 |
person |
240 |
R2 |
person |
300 |
R3 |
person |
370 |
Village |
person |
240 |
Government/Institution/Community |
person |
240 |
Commercial |
|
|
Job Types E2 to E5 |
employee |
350 |
Industrial |
|
|
Job Type E1* |
employee |
1,000 |
Schools |
|
|
School |
school place |
25 |
Notes:
Based on Sewerage Manual Part 1 (DSD, 1995).
* denotes in line with EEFS Final Report.
Table 6.5 Ultimate ADWF in Year 2016 for TKO Sewerage Catchment
Development
Type |
ADWF
(m3/d) |
Residential |
107,606 |
Commercial (E2 to E5) |
34,870 |
Industrial (E1) |
10,716 |
School |
1,738 |
Diversion from Port Shelter* |
10,585 |
TOTAL |
165,515 |
Notes: * Design ultimate
flows are based on Table B of the SENT Development Strategy Review Study
provided by EPD’s memo to TDD ref. (22) in EP 2/N8.Q/84 XII dated 16 June 2003.
Sewerage Impact Assessment Condition
Table 6.6 Proposed Changes in ADWF at TCS, TKL and PSK in Year 2016
|
Planning Area |
Baseline
Condition (m3/d) |
SIA Condition (m3/d) |
Change in
Percentage |
Change in ADWF
(m3/d) |
||||||||
Residential |
School Place |
Employment |
Residential |
School Place |
Employment |
Residential |
School Place |
Employment |
Residential |
School Place |
Employment |
||
Town Centre
South |
65 |
7,348 |
143 |
963 |
4,138 |
81 |
963 |
-44% |
-43% |
0% |
-3,210 |
-62 |
0 |
66 |
986 |
33 |
892 |
3,232 |
0 |
892 |
+228% |
-100% |
0% |
+2,246 |
-33 |
0 |
|
67 |
3,367 |
73 |
895 |
0 |
97 |
895 |
-100% |
+33% |
0% |
-3,367 |
+24 |
0 |
|
68 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
1,897 |
0 |
11 |
N/A |
0% |
0% |
+1,897 |
0 |
0 |
|
Sub-total |
11,701 |
249 |
2,761 |
9,267 |
178 |
2,761 |
-21% |
-29% |
0% |
-2,434 |
-72 |
0 |
|
Tiu Keng Leng |
73 |
7,301 |
149 |
1,451 |
6,782 |
139 |
1,451 |
-7% |
-7% |
0% |
-519 |
-10 |
0 |
74 |
5,770 |
25 |
1,451 |
3,564 |
65 |
1,451 |
-38% |
+158% |
0% |
-2,206 |
+40 |
0 |
|
Sub-total |
13,071 |
174 |
2,902 |
10,346 |
203 |
2,902 |
-21% |
+17% |
0% |
-2,725 |
+30 |
0 |
|
Pak Shing Kok |
78 |
798 |
8 |
104 |
1,941 |
8 |
104 |
+143% |
0% |
0% |
+1,143 |
0 |
0 |
Notes:
Assumes the employment within the development areas under the SIA
Condition remains unchanged from the Baseline Condition for conservatism.
“+” and “-” signs indicate elevation and depletion, respectively, against the baseline line value
N/A denotes Not Applicable
Table 6.7 Ultimate ADWF in Year 2016 for TKO Sewerage Catchment, with Further Development at TCS, TKL, PSK and TKO Stage 1 Landfill
Development
Type |
ADWF
(m3/d) |
Residential |
103,615 |
Commercial (E2 to E5) |
34,898 |
Industrial (E1) |
10,716 |
School |
1,697 |
Diversion from Port Shelter* |
10,585 |
TOTAL |
161,510 |
Notes: * Design ultimate
flows are based on Table B of the SENT Development Strategy Review Study
provided by EPD’s memo to TDD ref. (22) in EP 2/N8.Q/84 XII dated 16 June 2003.
Table 6.8 Recommended Peaking Factors for Sewers and PTWs
Population |
Peaking
Factor for Sewers* |
Population |
Peaking
Factor for PTWs* |
< 1,000 |
8 |
< 10,000 |
4 |
1,000 – 5,000 |
6 |
10,000 – 25,000 |
3.5 |
5,000 – 10,000 |
5 |
25,000 – 50,000 |
3 |
10,000 – 50,000 |
4 |
> 50,000 |
3.9/N0.075 |
> 50,000 |
7.3/N0.165 |
|
|
Notes:
* denotes peaking factors including stormwater allowance based on Sewerage Manual Part 1 (DSD, 1995).
N denotes equivalent population / 1,000.
Equivalent population = ADWF (m3/d) / 0.24.
Reference has been made to Section 4.7.2 of Sewerage Manual Part 1 (DSD, 1995) for calculation of peaking factor of PTW with population greater than 50,000.
Table 6.9 Ultimate PWWF in Year 2016 at TKO PTW
ADWF (m3/d) |
Equivalent
Population |
Peaking Factor * |
PWWF (m3/s) |
165,515 |
689,646 |
2.39 |
4.58 |
Notes:
* denotes peaking factors
including stormwater allowance based on Sewerage Manual Part 1 (DSD, 1995).
PWWF = ADWF x Peaking Factor
Reference has been made to
Section 4.7.2 of Sewerage Manual Part 1 (DSD, 1995) for calculation of Peaking
Factor of PTW with population greater than 50,000.
Sewerage Impact Assessment Condition
Table 6.10 Ultimate PWWF in Year 2016, with Revised Flows due to
Further Development at TCS, TKL, PSK, and TKO at Stage
1 Landfill, at TKO PTW
ADWF (m3/d) |
Equivalent
Population |
Peaking Factor * |
PWWF (m3/s) |
161,510 |
672,958 |
2.39 |
4.47 |
Notes:
* denotes peaking factors
including stormwater allowance based on Sewerage Manual Part 1 (DSD, 1995).
PWWF = ADWF x Peaking Factor
Reference has been made to
Section 4.7.2 of Sewerage Manual Part 1 (DSD, 1995) for calculation of Peaking
Factor of PTW with population greater than 50,000.
(i) Northwest System
(ii) South System
Table 6.11 TKO PTW Treatment Unit Capacities
Treatment
Unit |
No.
of Units |
Capacity
of Each Unit (m3/s) |
Inlet Pumps |
2 duty 3 duty 1 duty + 1
standby |
0.75 1.15 0.60 |
Coarse Screens |
1 duty + 1 standby |
4.50 |
Fine Screens |
4 duty + 1
standby |
1.72 |
Grit Removal |
2 duty 2 duty |
1.90 1.50 |
(i) There is a monthly flushing programme to check if the outfall is working properly. The present outfall is in good working condition despite its use has been terminated after the HATS deep tunnel commissioning in December 2001.
(ii) Presently, there is a hydrographic survey conducted every two years to check the outfall condition. The last hydrographic survey conducted was carried out in June 2002 and its condition is in order.
HATS Stage I Tunnel Section from Tseung Kwan O to Kwun Tong
Table 6.12 HATS Stage I Tunnel System Capacity
Tunnel
Link |
Apparent
Peak Flow Capacity (m3/s)* |
TKO à Kwun Tong |
4.89 |
Kwun Tong à To Kwa Wan |
14.81 |
To Kwa Wan à SCI STW |
21.80 |
Notes: * based on Final Report of Further Development of SSDS Stage III/IV and PPFS.
Proposed Sewerage Systems for TCS and PSK
Performance Assessment for Sewerage System
· A minimum freeboard of 1 m; and
· A minimum factor of safety against overflow of 1.15, i.e. overflow will not occur at a flow rate of (1.15 times Peak Flow).
Table 6.13 Summary of Surcharged Sewers under Peak Flows at Baseline Condition
Pipe Dia. (mm) |
Length (m) |
450 |
308 |
525 |
96 |
600 |
55 |
675 |
164 |
1,050 |
32 |
Total |
655 |
Table 6.14 Summary of Surcharged Sewers under 1.15 x Peak Flows at Baseline Condition
Pipe Dia. (mm) |
Length (m) |
450 |
596 |
525 |
569 |
600 |
388 |
675 |
305 |
900 |
15 |
1,050 |
32 |
1,650 |
147 |
Total |
2,052 |
Table 6.15 Existing Sewers with Adverse Gradient
Ref. No. in Fig. 6.4 to 6.6 |
Link Ref. |
D/S Node |
Location |
Length (m) |
Pipe Dia. (mm) |
U/S I.L. (mPD) |
D/S I.L. (mPD) |
1 |
18_39.1 |
18_42 |
Within TKO Industrial
Estate, along Chun Choi Street near Chun Ying Street |
42 |
900 |
-0.530 |
-0.340 |
2 |
4_33.1* |
2_81 |
Along Po Fung Road near Po
Lam Road North |
60 |
675 |
1.800 |
1.810 |
3 |
10_72.1 |
10_73 |
Along Po Yap Road near Wan
Po Road |
69 |
1,650 |
-1.840 |
-1.790 |
4 |
30_36.1 |
30_39 |
In Choi Ming Court Estate
Road to Road P2 |
15 |
900 |
2.790 |
3.000 |
5 |
30_42.1 |
30_45 |
In Road P2 near Tong Ming
Court |
21 |
900 |
2.760 |
2.840 |
6 |
V20_20.1* |
18_51 |
At the junction of Chun
Kwong Street and Chun Ying Street |
40 |
450 |
-0.370 |
-0.090 |
7 |
V220_100.1* |
V220_110 |
Near Nan Fung Plaza Tower 3 |
55 |
450 |
1.050 |
1.140 |
Sewerage Impact
Assessment
Condition
Table 6.16 Summary of Surcharged Sewers at Peak Flow under SIA Condition
Pipe Dia. (mm) |
Length (m) |
450 |
343 |
525 |
96 |
600 |
55 |
675 |
164 |
1,050 |
32 |
Total |
690 |
Table 6.17 Summary of Surcharged Sewers at 1.15 x Peak Flow under SIA Condition
Pipe Dia. (mm) |
Length (m) |
450 |
486 |
525 |
569 |
600 |
388 |
675 |
305 |
1,050 |
32 |
Total |
1,780 |
Checking of the
Hydraulic Model
TKO Preliminary Treatment
Works
Nodes |
2002 |
2003 |
2_48 |
5.10 |
5.11 |
2_63 |
2.75 |
2.76 |
10_69 |
-1.657 |
-1.71 |
It is noted that the difference in drainage record
is relatively minor and would not result in changes to the findings of
assessment and would not vary the extent of the surcharged sewers under both
Peak and 1.15x Peak conditions and hence variation to the extent of the
recommended sewerage upgrading works would not be resulted. Nevertheless, the
latest situation including the population figures and pipe asset data should be
taken into account in the detailed design stage of the recommended upgrading
works.
TKO
Preliminary Treatment Works
HATS Stage I Tunnel Section from Tseung Kwan O to Kwun Tong
Table 6.18 Summary of Recommended Sewerage Upgrading Works
Existing Pipe Size (mm) |
Upgrading Pipe Size (mm) |
Pipe Length (m) |
450 |
600 |
599 |
525 |
700 |
354 |
525 |
900 |
96 |
600 |
900 |
193 |
675 |
900 |
305 |
1,050 |
1,500 |
16 |
Total |
1,563 |
Remark : By
Implementation of the above upgrading works, the bottlenecked sewers will be
removed and thus, there is no need to upgrade all the problematic sewers
presented in earlier tTables 6.17.
Table 6.19 Summary of Recommended Sewerage Upgrading Works
Existing Pipe Size (mm) |
Upgrading Pipe Size (mm) |
Pipe Length (m) |
450 |
600 |
599 |
525 |
700 |
354 |
525 |
900 |
96 |
600 |
900 |
193 |
675 |
900 |
305 |
1,050 |
1,500 |
16 |
Total |
1,563 |
6 sewerage and sewage
treatment
6.2 Sewerage Catchment Area, Development and Flow
Projections
6.3 Existing & Committed Sewerage
Infrastructure
6.4 Sewerage Impact Assessment
Table 6.1 Ultimate Population in Year 2016 for TKO Sewerage Catchment in Baseline
Condition
Table 6.2 Proposed
Changes in Population at TCS, TKL and PSK in Year 2016
Table 6.4
Recommended Unit Flow Factors
Table 6.5
Ultimate ADWF in Year 2016 for TKO Sewerage Catchment
Table 6.6
Proposed Changes in ADWF at TCS, TKL and PSK in Year 2016
Table 6.8 Recommended
Peaking Factors for Sewers and PTWs
Table 6.9 Ultimate PWWF in Year 2016 at TKO PTW
Table 6.11 TKO
PTW Treatment Unit Capacities
Table 6.12 HATS
Stage I Tunnel System Capacity
Table 6.13 Summary
of Surcharged Sewers under Peak Flows at Baseline Condition
Table 6.14 Summary
of Surcharged Sewers under 1.15 x Peak Flows at Baseline Condition
Table 6.15
Existing Sewers with Adverse Gradient
Table 6.16 Summary
of Surcharged Sewers at Peak Flow under SIA Condition
Table 6.17 Summary
of Surcharged Sewers at 1.15 x Peak Flow under SIA Condition
Table 6.18 Summary
of Recommended Sewerage Upgrading Works
Table 6.19 Summary
of Recommended Sewerage Upgrading Works