1                         Introduction

1.1                    Project Background

1.1.1             The opening of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Western Corridor (HK-SWC) and Deep Bay Link (DBL) in 2007 will undoubtedly increase the east-west traffic in Northwest New Territories.  It is anticipated that most of this additional cross-boundary traffic will make use of Tuen Mun Road (TMR) to access the urban areas. 

1.1.2             TMR is the major east-west transport corridor in the Northwest New Territories.  The section of Town Centre Section of TMR (TCSTMR) (from Lam Tei to Sam Shing Hui) is currently operating close to its capacity.  This section is the most critical section of TMR as the number of traffic lanes reduces from three to two at a number of interchanges.  The traffic conditions of this road section will inevitably be worsened by the additional traffic from HK-SWC.  Hence traffic improvement schemes will be necessary to relieve the traffic congestion at this section of road.

1.1.3             In this regard, Transport Department (TD) conducted a study to investigate measures to ameliorate the traffic congestion for TCSTMR.  The study report recommended, inter alia, the following traffic improvement measures to alleviate the anticipated traffic congestion of the TCSTMR after the commissioning of the HK-SWC and DBL:

Ÿ               Provision of an additional interchange connecting Tuen Mun Road and Castle Peak Road near Sam Shing Estate; and

Ÿ               Widening of TMR at Tsing Tin Interchange from a dual two-lane to dual three-lane arrangement.

1.1.4             Following the recommendations of the TD’s Study, Highways Department (HyD) submitted the project profile for the application of the EIA Study Brief in June 2005.  Environmental Protection Department (EPD) issued the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study brief (ESB-127/2005) for “Provision of Additional Interchange Connecting Tuen Mun Road and Castle Peak Road Near Sam Shing Estate and Widening of Tuen Mun Road at Tsing Tin Interchange”on 22 July 2005.   

1.1.5             In January 2007, Maunsell Consultants Asia Limited (MCAL) was employed by the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, represented by the Director of HyD to undertake the EIA for “Widening of Tuen Mun Road at Tsing Tin Interchange”(hereafter called “Project”).  The Project is to widen about 240m long dual two-lane section of at-grade Tuen Mun Road at Tsing Tin Interchange to a dual three-lane carriageway.  Associated with the road widening works, environmental mitigation measures will also be implemented during the construction and operation stages.  The Project study area is shown Figure 1.1.

1.1.6             Under this Agreement, MCAL will conduct an EIA Study only covering the widening of Tuen Mun Road at Tsing Tin Interchange but excluding the provision of interchange near Sam Shing Estate as stated in the EIA study brief (ESB-127/2005).  The EIA study identified the potential environmental issues arising from the Project such as air quality, noise, water, waste management, hazard to life, landscape and visual and cultural heritage, and the likely mitigation measures required.

1.2                    Objectives and Scope of the EIA Study

1.2.1             The objectives of the EIA study are as follows:

(i)                to describe the Project and associated works together with the requirements for carrying out the Project;

(ii)              to identify and describe elements of community and environment likely to be affected by the Project and/or likely to cause adverse impacts to the Project, including natural and man-made environmental and the associated environmental constraints;

(iii)             to provide information on the consideration of alternatives to avoid and minimize potential environmental impacts to ecologically sensitive areas and other sensitive uses; to compare the environmental benefits and dis-benefits of each of different options; to provide reasons for selecting the preferred option(s) and to describe the part environmental factors played in the selection of preferred option(s);

(iv)            to identify and quantify emission sources and determine the significance of impacts on sensitive receivers and potential affected uses;

(v)              to identify and quantify any potential landscape and visual impacts and to propose measures to mitigate these impacts;

(vi)            to identify and quantify any potential hazard to life impacts and to propose measures to mitigate these impacts;

(vii)           to identify and quantify any potential losses or damage to flora, fauna and natural habitats and to propose measures to mitigate these impacts;

(viii)         to identify any negative impacts on site of cultural heritage and to propose measures to mitigate these impacts;

(ix)            to propose the provision of mitigation measures so as to minimize pollution, environmental disturbance and nuisance construction and operation of the Project;

(x)              to investigate the feasibility, practicability, effectiveness and implications of the proposed mitigation measures;

(xi)            to identify, predict and evaluate the residual environmental impacts (i.e. after practicable mitigation) and the cumulative effects expected to arise during the construction and operation phases of the Project in relation to the sensitive receivers and potential affected uses;

(xii)           to identify, assess and specify methods, measures and standards, to be included in the detailed design, construction and operation of the Project which are necessary to mitigate these environmental impacts and cumulative effects and reduce them to acceptable levels;

(xiii)         to investigate the extent of the secondary environmental impacts that may arise from the proposed mitigation measures and to identify constraints associated with the mitigation measures recommended in the EIA study, as well as the provision of any necessary modification; and

(xiv)         to design and specify environmental monitoring and audit requirements to ensure the effective implementation of the recommended environmental protection and pollution control measures.

 

1.3                    Assessment Area

1.3.1             The widening of Tuen Mun Road at Tsing Tin Interchange is classified as a Designated Project under Schedule 2, part 1, A.1 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO).  Environmental Permit is required for the construction and operation of the Project.

1.3.2             The Assessment Area for the EIA Study, as specified in the EIA Study Brief, is presented below:

(i)                Air quality impact assessment – area within a distance of 500m from the boundary of the Project site;

(ii)              Noise impact assessment – area within 300m from the Project boundary.  The assessment area would be reduced accordingly if the first layer of noise sensitive receivers provides acoustic shielding to those receivers located further away;

(iii)             Water quality impact assessment – cover an area within 500m of the Project site boundary, and up to 500m along the Tuen Mun River Channel from the boundary of the Project;

(iv)            Waste management and land contamination assessment – cover the area within the Project boundary;

(v)              Hazard to life assessment – the study area is the consultation zone of Tuen Mun Water Treatment Works;

(vi)            Ecological impact assessment – the study area for terrestrial ecological assessment shall include all areas within 500m from the site boundary of the land based works area or the area likely to be impacted by the Project.  For the aquatic ecology environment, the study area shall be the same as the water quality impact assessment;

(vii)           Landscape and visual impact assessment – the assessment area for landscape impact assessment will include areas within a 100m distance from the site boundary of the work areas while the assessment area for the visual impact assessment will be defined by the visual envelope of the Project; and

(viii)         Cultural heritage impact assessment – cover the area within the Project boundary.

 

1.4                    Structure of Report

1.4.1              The background of the Project and objectives of this Report are introduced in this Section 1.  A description of the Project is provided in Section 2.  Sections 3 to 11 detail the results of the environmental impact assessment, covering relevant legislation, environmental conditions, assessment criteria and methods, and assessment findings.  Sections 2 to 11 include:

Ÿ               Section 2 – Project Description

Ÿ               Section 3 – Air Quality

Ÿ               Section 4 – Noise

Ÿ               Section 5 – Water Quality

Ÿ               Section 6 – Waste Management

Ÿ               Section 7 – Land Contamination

Ÿ               Section 8 –Hazard to Life

Ÿ               Section 9 –Ecology

Ÿ               Section 10 – Landscape and Visual

Ÿ               Section 11 – Cultural Heritage

 

1.4.2             Section 12 highlights the environmental monitoring audit (EM&A) requirements for the Project.  A conclusion of the whole assessment is given in Section 13.  A detailed implementation schedule of the recommended mitigation measures is provided in Section 14.