8                         Hazard to life

8.1                   Introduction

8.1.1             In accordance with the EIA Study Brief (ESB-127/2005), a Hazard Assessment (HA) shall be conducted to assess the hazard to life impact of the Tuen Mun Water Treatment Works (TMWTW) to both the construction and operation stages of the Project.  Location of TMWTW is shown in Figure 8.1.

8.1.2             This hazard assessment aims at achieving the objective specified in the Section 2.1 (iv) of the EIA Study Brief (No. ESB-127/2005) which is replicated as below.

to identify and quantify any potential hazard to life impacts and to propose measures to mitigate these impacts”.

 

8.1.3             The scope of the hazard to life assessment is to address the potential hazard to life impacts from construction and operation of the Project as specified in Section 3.4.5 of the EIA study brief as shown below.

“3.4.5.1 A hazard assessment shall be carried out following the criteria for evaluating hazard to life as stated in Annexes 4 and 22 of the TM (Hong Kong Risk Guidelines).  The assessment shall evaluate hazardous scenarios from Tuen Mun Water Treatment Works (TMWTW) to both the construction and operation stages of the Project.  The hazard assessment shall include the following

 

(i) Identification of all credible hazardous scenarios associated with the chlorine storage and on-site transport in the Tuen Mun Water Treatment Works;

 

(ii) Execution of a Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) expressing population risks in both individual and societal terms;

 

(iii) Comparison of individual and societal risks with Hong Kong Risk Guidelines (Annex 4 of TM); and

 

(iv) Identification and assessment of practicable and cost-effective risk mitigation measures.

 

3.4.5.2 The methodology of hazard assessment shall be agreed and approved by the Director taking into account previous EIAO hazard assessments such as Route 8 (formerly Route 16).“

 

8.2                   Study Approach

General

8.2.1             A similar Hazard Assessment study, namely the Route 8 EIA Study (formerly Route 16), has been reviewed and taken as a reference for the Project.

8.2.2             Hazardous scenarios have been identified by reviewing hazardous scenarios developed for similar installations.

8.2.3             Hazardous scenarios and frequencies adopted for TMWTW has been confirmed independently using review of historical incidents as instructed by the Court of Final Appeal (CFA). The Major Hazard Incident Data Services (MHIDAS) accident database has been reviewed in this study.

8.2.4             In order to assess the risks during construction and operation stages of the Project, three assessment timeframes proposed are given as follows.

a)            Baseline Validation – Validation of risk level of 2006 base case scenario generated from BMT’s in-house RISKSUM model is comparable with other risk summation software, such as GISRisk.

b)            Construction Stage Case – Assessment of risk level during construction (Year 2009) of the Project taking into account the peak construction workforce level, future traffic population in Tuen Mun Road (TMR) and adjacent populations.

c)            Operation Stage Case – Assessment of risk level during operation (Year 2024) of the Project taking into account the future traffic forecast in TMR and adjacent populations forecast.

8.2.5             This HA consists of 5 major phases:

a)            Hazard Identification: Identification of all credible hazardous scenarios associated with the chlorine storage and on-site transport in the TMWTW by reviewing of historical incident database and similar previous studies.

b)            Frequency Assessment: Assess the likelihood of occurrence of the identified hazardous scenarios.

c)            Consequence Assessment: Assess the consequences and impact to construction workers, road population in TMR and adjacent population.

d)            Risk Assessment: Evaluates the risks level, in terms of individual risk and societal risk. The risks will be compared with the criteria stipulated in Annex 4 of the Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process issued by Environmental Protection Department (EPD) to determine their acceptability.

e)            Identification of Mitigation Measures: Practicable and cost-effective risk mitigation measures will be identified and assessed as necessary. Risks of mitigated case will be then reassessed to determine the level of risk reduction.

 

Risk Acceptability Criteria

8.2.6             As set out in Annex 4 of the EIAO-TM, the risk guidelines comprise two measures shown as follows:

a)            Individual Risk: the maximum level of off-site individual risk should not exceed 1 x 10-5 / year, i.e. 1 in 100,000 per year.

b)            Societal Risk is presented graphically as in Figure 8.2.  The Societal Risk Guideline is expressed in terms of lines plotting the cumulative frequency (F) of N or more fatalities in the population from accidents at the facility of concern.

Verification of RISMSUM Software

8.2.7             Calibration exercises have been conducted to verify the risks results generated by RISKSUM is comparable with other software used for hazard assessment.

8.2.8             In comparison with the Individual Contours and FN Curve generated by RISKSUM, the magnitude of the individual risk and societal risk are found comparable with the results generated by other risk software package, such as GISRisk. Therefore, using the RISKSUM for the risk assessment in this Widening of Tuen Mun Road project is considered acceptable. Figure 8.3 and Figure 8.4 presented the comparison of the Individual Risk Contours and the FN curves generated by RISKSUM with that of the GISRisk respectively.

 

8.3                   Background Study Information

Population – Base Year (Year 2006)

8.3.1             Latest population data, which indicate the presence and locations of people in surrounding areas of the TMWTW, have been collected to update the dataset for this study.

8.3.2             Population data considered include all the existing and potential future population that may be affected by accidental release of chlorine gas from the TMWTW.

8.3.3             Table 8.1 presents the data sources that have been collected.

Table 81         Population and Traffic Data Sources

Sources

Details

Census and Statistic Department

            2006 Population Census

            Summary Statistic of Constituency Area in Tuen Mun, 2006

Planning Department

Projections of Population Distribution, 2006-2015

Territory Population and Employment Data Matrices (TPEDM) 2021

Housing Authority

Population in Public Housing Estate

Transport Department

Traffic Census 2006

Hospital Authority

Bed spaces available and Number of Staff in Tuen Mun Hospital

Education Bureau

School Information lists by District

Lingnan College

Student Enrolment, Staff and Hostel Occupancy Rate

Future Traffic Forecast

Traffic Forecast data 2009 and 2024, ENSR 2007

Others

Information from Water Supplies Department’s (WSD) previous study of Tuen Mun Water Treatment Works

 

8.3.4             Population in Public Housing Estate are extracted from Housing Authority Public Housing Estate profile, these include Prime View Garden, Siu Hong Court, and Fu Tai Estate.

8.3.5             Population in private residential developments are generated based on the number of households in each building and the average household size defined by different districts in Tuen Mun as specified from the Census and Statistic Department.

8.3.6             Regarding the population in schools and colleges, relevant student enrolment information for year 2006/07 is collected from Education Bureau for all nurseries, kindergartens, and primary schools located within the study area.  Students, staff, and hostel residents at Lingnan College are also taken into consideration.

8.3.7             For a conservative estimation of population in Tuen Mun Hospital, it is assumed that 100% occupancy rate for all its available bed spaces. The numbers of patients together with the number of staff working in the hospital give the total population in the hospital for risk modelling.

8.3.8             The population data distribution at different time periods listed below is considered. A ‘jammed peak’ period has also been considered for traffic standstill, ‘bumper-to-bumper’ conditions. Percentage distributions of each time period are given in Appendix 8.1 of this report.

a)            Working Day.

b)            Weekend Day.

c)            Night.

d)            Peak hour.

e)            Jammed Peak Hour.

Construction workforce

8.3.9             The Project involves construction activities including tree felling, at grade road widening (minor excavation and minor slope works, realign the kerb), paving, road marking and construction of noise barrier.  As there would be no closure of road lane during construction to ensure the smooth traffic condition on TMR, the allowable working area is small and therefore the number of worker at the work site would be limited.  As advised by Highways Department (HyD), the number of workers would be 20 persons.

Population Estimation during construction and operation stage

8.3.10         Table 8.2 summaries the details for estimation of Tuen Mun population in 2009 and 2024. Details of population estimation and the percentage distribution at each time period for each population group in the vicinity of the TMWTW are consolidated in Appendix 8.1.

 

Table 82         Estimation of Future Population

Population Sector

2009 (Construction Stage)

2024 (Operation Stage)

Residential

Resident Population (2006/2009) Tuen Mun District = 8% increase

Source: Census Department - 2009 Projected HK Resident

Resident Population (2009/2021) Tuen Mun District = 11% increase

Additional 0.9% per year increment from 2021 to 2024 is assumed

Source: Planning Department – TPEDM 2021

Transportation Facilities

During Peak Hours, LRT Station and trains reach maximum capacity

Consistent with base case representing worst case scenario

During Peak Hours, LRT Station and trains reach maximum capacity

Consistent with base case representing worst case scenario

Schools

Population by Age (2006/2009)

Age 0-4 = 3% decrease

Age 5-9 = 14% decrease

Age 10-14 = 17% decrease

Source: Census Department - 2009 Projected HK Resident

For a conservative assessment, 11% increase from 2009 is assumed (in line with resident population growth in Tuen Mun)

 Source: Planning Department – TPEDM 2021

Hospitals

100% occupancy rate for all available bed spaces

Consistent with base case representing worst case scenario

100% occupancy rate for all available bed spaces

Consistent with base case representing worst case scenario

 

Population – Transient (Road)

8.3.11         To estimate transient population at each time period mentioned before, the same methodology as adopted in the WSD previous study has been used.

8.3.12         Traffic and transportation facilities population considered in this study includes population on Tuen Mun Road and Castle Peak Road and facilities include five (5) Light Rail Train (LRT) stations, and two (2) light rail trains route.  The locations of these populations are indicated in the figure attached in Appendix 8.1.

8.3.13         The population associated with the road vehicles and railway has been modelled as 100% outdoor. Stationary condition of the vehicles at major highways are assumed to account for the traffic stop due to traffic light control, peak jam conditions or the possibility of chlorine gas leakage resulted in stand still of the traffic in one direction. For the opposite direction of traffic, population of vehicle travelling has been estimated based on traffic flow of forecast.

8.3.14         Population of traffic in standstill condition at major highway is estimated based on the total length of road, number of traffic lanes, length of vehicle, distribution of different vehicle classes, and occupancy rate of different vehicles.

8.3.15         The standstill condition of Tuen Mun Road before and after widening from a dual 2-lane to dual 3-lane arrangement at Tsing Tin Interchange has also been included in the transient population estimations.

8.3.16         For estimating the construction stage (Year 2009) traffic, data obtained from traffic survey conducted on Year 2006 was used. Annual growth factor 1% per year (based on the population and employment growth between Year 2006 and 2011) was adopted for projection of population.

8.3.17         Future traffic forecast of TMR at operation stage (Year 2024) for the EIA study has been conducted by traffic consultants and endorsed by Transport Department (TD). The methodology of traffic flow forecast in 6 vehicle classes for the project is presented below.

a)            Step 1 - The 2021 traffic model have been adopted as a background traffic model flow in term of passenger car unit (PCU) per hour to present each road link.

b)            Step 2 - The percentage of vehicle types was derived according to the traffic counts survey.  The model traffic flows were split into different vehicle classes based on the percentage of vehicle type obtained from traffic survey.

c)            Step 3 - The model flows in PCU were converted to vehicle (VEH) using predefined conversion factors derived from the TPDM recommendation.  The PCU factor for car, taxi, special purpose buses, light goods vehicles, heavy goods vehicles and public transport are 1.00, 1.00, 2.00, 1.50, 2.25 and 3.00 respectively.

d)            Step 4 - The year 2024 traffic flows has been developed by applying an annual growth factor derived from the TPEDM planning data.  The annual growth factor 0.9% per year has been applied to the year 2021 traffic flow as shown in Step 3.

e)            Step 5 - The various type of 6 vehicle classes were calculated based on the result of Step 4.

 

8.3.18         Population of other traffic in normal travelling condition is calculated based on the following equation for each type of traffic mix.

Traffic Population =

No. of person per vehicle * No. of vehicles per hr * Road Length

Vehicle speed

 

 

Population – Transient (Railway)

8.3.19         Population in crush loading at peak hour of LRT trains are assumed to be 434 and 394 for LRT III and LRT IV respectively.

8.3.20         For a conservative assessment, population at each Light Rail Train Station is assumed at its maximum capacity and similarly for passengers on light rail trains.

Meteorological Data

8.3.21         Meteorological conditions (wind direction, speed and stability) would affect the consequence of release. Meteorological data from the Hong Kong Observatory Tuen Mun weather station in Year 2006 has been adopted in the model.

8.4                   Hazard Identification

Review of TMWTW Facilities

 

8.4.1             The TMWTW facilities have been reviewed to ensure the latest information has been incorporated into the assessment.

8.4.2             Information regarding latest chlorine facilities installed in the TMWTW was gathered during site visit to the treatment work on 17 July 2007. During the visit, an interview has been conducted with operation staff to confirm the latest operation and safety practice in place in the treatment works.

8.4.3             The mechanical ventilation system and the chlorine scrubbing system installed provide controlled air circulation and treatment of air in case of chlorine release.

8.4.4             The scrubber system consists of an absorber tower with re-circulating sodium hydroxide solution as a neutralizing agent. Air contaminated with chlorine gas will be extracted from the plant room, where a chlorine leak has occurred, and neutralized.

8.4.5             These systems are designed to prevent chlorine gas escape from the storage area in case of leakage.

8.4.6             Regarding the safety provision, emergency repair and stoppage kit manufactured to the specification of the Chlorine Institute is provided according to safety requirements of Fire Services Department (FSD).

Review of Identified Hazards

 

8.4.7             To identify potential hazards associated with the storage and the transportation of chlorine in the TMWTW, hazards related to the chlorine facilities have been reviewed and confirmed by reviewing of historical incident database, MHIDAS.

8.4.8             Major hazard categories identified are listed below:

a)       Access Road;

b)      Container Handling;

c)       Containers in Storage;

d)      Connection and Disconnection of Chlorine Containers; and

e)       Chlorination System.

 

8.4.9             Related chlorine release scenarios have been examined and confirmed valid to use in this study.

Review of MHIDAS Incident Database

 

8.4.10         The Major Hazard Incidents Data Service (MHIDAS) database holds details of over seven thousand incidents which have occurred during the transport, processing or storage of hazardous materials which resulted in or it is considered had the potential to cause off-site impact.

8.4.11         A review on MHIDAS database of the relevant historical incidents of the same genus to TMWTW has been conducted to confirm if the hazardous scenarios identified are acceptable.

8.4.12         A search in the MHIDAS using the keywords such as “Chlorine”, “Leakage”, “Water Treatment Works” and “Cylinders” has been conducted to identify incidents involving in Drinking Water Treatment Process. The following combinations of keywords search were conducted and a total of 109 records have been reviewed.

·        Chlorine & Release;

·        Chlorine & Leakage;

·        Chlorine & Water & Treatment;

·        Chlorine & Truck & Fire;

·        Chlorine & Truck & Collision; and

·        Chlorine & Truck & Impact.

 

8.4.13         From the 109 records, 16 records were identified as the same genus of Water Treatment Plant of this study. The remaining records, which are not related to water treatment plant, such as leakage from railcar, release of chlorine due to mixing of two chemicals, release in chemical factory, chemical production plant etc, are not further considered in this study.

8.4.14         A total of 10 incidents from these 16 hazards from the MHIDAS were retained for further frequencies analysis. Details of each incident are given in Appendix 8.2.

8.4.15         Table 8‑3 summarised the types of chlorine incidents from the MHIDAS database.


Table 83         Summary of Chlorine Incidents of Water Treatment Plant from MHIDAS

Hazardous Scenario

No. of Cases

Country

Failure Frequency Calculation

Pipework Failure

7

France, Hong Kong, UK & USA

Yes.

Cylinder Failure

3

France, UK & USA

Yes.

Others (Tank/Drum)

6

Puerto Rico, UK, USA

No.
(No Tank and Drum installed in TMWTW)

 

8.4.16         Upon completion of the incident review, no new hazard has been identified. For other hazards such as earthquake, truck fire, etc., no historical incidents related to these hazards has been found from the MHIDAS search.

8.4.17         ALL hazards identified have been adopted in the risk model of current study.

Hazard Associated with Construction Works

 

8.4.18         The Project involves construction activities which include tree felling, at grade road widening (minor excavation and minor slope works, realign the kerb), paving, road marking and construction of noise barrier.  All these construction activities will be carried out outside the boundary fence of the TMWTW, which is approximately 400m away from the site.

8.4.19         In addition, there is a small hill (50m high) located southwest of the TMWTW. This hill forms a protective barrier to prevent any construction activities or incidents to affect the chlorine facilities.

8.4.20         Therefore, it is considered that risk associated with the construction activities to the chlorine storage and dosing system of the TMWTW is zero.

8.5                   Frequency Assessment

General

8.5.1             With the potential hazards identified, the frequency of each hazardous scenario are then determined.

8.5.2             Scenario frequencies, provided by WSD, have been adopted in current study to assess the population risk.

8.5.3             Historical accidents in the MHIDAS database were selected to estimate the occurrence frequencies of hazardous scenarios and then to verify the frequencies of occurrence adopted in this study.

8.5.4             Frequencies of occurrence of hazardous scenarios determined were then used as input parameters for modelling using RISKSUM.

Review of Event Frequencies

8.5.5             As noted in Table 8‑3, ten (10) relevant incidents were identified and used for estimating the failure frequencies.

8.5.6             To assess the occurrence frequencies for the historical chlorine release incidents, estimation for the number of drinking water treatment plants (WTP) in the countries that the accidents occurred has been conducted.

8.5.7             To estimate the total number of water treatment plant operating during 1964 to 2006 (Time span of MHIDAS data) in Europe and USA, population and number of WTP of a range of representative cities are collected. The number of residents that a WTP serves in the region is then calculated. Then the total population of Europe and USA are collected to estimate the numbers of WTP are operating in these countries.

8.5.8             Estimated number of water treatment plants in Europe and USA based on the total country population is presented in Table 8‑4 and the average number of served population per plant is given in Table 8‑5.

Table 84     Estimation of Served Population per Plant

Country

Locations

No. of WTP

Served Population

Average Served Population per plant

UK

England and Wales

1,386

52,710,000

38,030

USA

8 Cities /District

47

8,525,143

181,386

 

Table 85      Estimation of Total WTP in Europe and USA

Region

Total Population

Population serve per plant

Estimate No. of WTP

Europe

728,501,000

38,030

19,156

USA

281,421,906

181,386

1,552

Total:

20,708

 

8.5.9             Considering there was a release case occurred in Hong Kong in 1992, the 21 Water Treatment Works serving Hong Kong residents are included in the calculation (i.e. 20,708 + 21 = 20729).

8.5.10         From 1964 to 2006, a total of 42 years of records registered in MHIDAS database. Therefore, it is estimated that 870,618 plant-year of operation. From this figure, the occurrence frequencies of pipework leakage and cylinder leakage in WTW are calculated to be 8.04E-06 per year and 3.44E-06 per year respectively.

8.5.11         In comparison with the frequency of container failure (1.5E-4 per year) to be adopted, the occurrence frequency (3.44E-06) from historical incidents is lower. Therefore, it is conservative to adopt the container failure frequency of 1.5E-4 per year.

8.5.12         With regard to accident of delivery vehicle, no incident record related to truck fire, rollover and impact was found. To estimate a future potential failure frequency of these events, an expected number of 0.7 incident is obtained from Poisson distribution with an assumption of 50% probability of occurrence.

8.5.13         From the above discussion, occurrence frequency of truck incident lead to chlorine gas leakage is estimated to be 8.04E-7 per year and is the same order of magnitude with or smaller than the frequencies proposed to be adopted. Therefore, it is considered that adoption of truck accident frequencies is acceptable.

8.5.14         Table 8‑6 presents the comparison of frequencies estimated from historical accident data and that adopted in this study.

Table 86      Comparison of Event Frequencies

Scenarios

Event Frequency per year

(Adopt in this study)

(Historical incidents)

Cylinder failure

1.5E-4

3.44E-6

Truck Rollover

9.9E-6

8.04E-7

Truck Impact

2.0E-5

Truck Fire

2.0E-7

 

 

8.5.15         For external events which are earthquake and aircraft crash, the frequencies of occurrence were determined using accident data in previous study.  It is confirmed that adopting these frequencies in current study are acceptable. Table 8‑7 provides the details.


 

Table 87      External Event Frequencies

Scenarios

Event Frequency

Source

Aircraft Crash

1.2E-08 per landing

Based on US National Transportation Safety Board aircraft crash data

Earthquake 0.4g ground acceleration

1.00E-05

Cook et al (1993)

Earthquake 0.6g ground acceleration

1.00E-06

 

8.6                   Consequence Assessment

General

8.6.1             In this section, the assessment of consequence of each chlorine gas release scenarios will be given.

8.6.2             Lethal Dose (LD) contours provided by WSD from a wind tunnel test have been adopted in this study.

8.6.3             The advantage of wind tunnel testing over other consequence modelling tools is that it can simulate the dense gas dispersion due to the effects of buildings and complex terrain under different wind speed and direction.

8.6.4             Therefore, adopting the results from the wind tunnel testing conducted can provide a best estimation of consequences of chlorine gas release.

8.6.5             The following subsections summarise the assumptions and other calculations used in the consequence assessment.

Source Term Modelling

8.6.6             The initial release of chlorine was estimated based on standard discharge formulae and was used in the wind tunnel testing. The details are listed in Table 8‑8.

Table 88      Summary of Source Term Modelling Details

Release case

Hole size (mm)

Phase

Mode of release to atmosphere (internal release cases only

Release rate to atmosphere or instantaneous release quantity

Release duration

External release (50kg cylinder)

Small leak

2

Vapour

-

0.005 kg/s

167 min

 

 

Liquid

-

0.09 kg/s

9 min

Medium leak

5

Liquid

-

0.55 kg/s

1.5 min

 

 

Two-phase

-

0.14 kg/s

6 min

Multiple medium leaks

35 x 5

Two-phase

-

5.0 kg/s

6 min

Rupture

-

Liquid

-

50 kg

-

Internal releases (50kg cylinder or chlorine pipework)

Pigtail-guillotine failure

2.5

Vapour

Normal ventilation remains on

0.0016 kg/s

10 min

 

 

 

 

Door left open

0.007 kg/s

10 min

Small leak from cylinder

2

Liquid

Normal ventilation remains on

0.018 kg/s

10 min

 

 

 

Door left open

0.008 kg/s

10 min

Medium leak from cylinder

5

Liquid

Normal ventilation remains on

0.028 kg/s

10 min

 

 

 

Door left open

0.013 kg/s

10 min

Rupture

(1 cylinder)

-

Liquid

Pressurisation of chlorine store – release via weak points

0.06 kg/s

2s

 

Rupture

(5 cylinders)

-

Liquid

Pressurisation of chlorine store release via weak points

1.5 kg/s

2s

 

 

Toxic Impact Assessment

8.6.7             Chlorine Probit equation, shown below, was used for estimating the fatality rate of human expose to chlorine gas, and hence the LD contours.

Pr = -14.3 + ln C 2.3t

 

Pr = Probit value

C = Chlorine Concentration (mg/l)

T = exposure time (minutes)

 

Assumption of Escape from Gas Cloud

8.6.8             The possibility of escape from a gas cloud of an exposed person is normally taken into consideration in determination of probability of fatalities of outdoors population.

8.6.9             The effective outdoor probability of fatality was applied in current assessment. Table 8‑9 presented the probability adopted in this study.

Table 89      Effective Outdoors Probability of Fatality

Nominal Outdoor Fatality probability (for a person remaining outdoor)

% of population attempting escape

Effective outdoor fatality probability (taking into account the probability of escape)

90%

0%

90%

50%

80%

31%

3%

80%

0.7%

 

Chlorine Cloud Height

8.6.10         Height of Chlorine Cloud for various release cases were considered to determine the effect to people inside high-rise buildings. The number of storey of a building may be affected by the gas cloud and hence the probability of fatality of population in high-rise building is estimated in RISKSUM.

Sensitive Population Consideration

8.6.11         Population at locations accommodating sensitive population (i.e. nurseries, primary schools, old people homes and hospitals) would have the fatality probability higher than that of the average population.  To cater this effect, a factor of 3.3 was applied to the population of these locations.

Impact to Road Population

8.6.12         The methodology documented in Route 8 EIA study for modelling the effect of chlorine release on transient populations, in particular road vehicles, has been adopted. This methodology considers the extent of chlorine build up inside the vehicle and whether this could impair driver’s ability to cause vehicles to come to a standstill.

Wind Tunnel Testing Results

8.6.13         The results of the wind tunnel tests with a wind speed of 2m/s adopted in current study are summarised in Table 8‑10. Cloud dispersion contours for LD levels 90, 50 and 3 are adopted. These results will be scaled for risk modelling using RISKSUM.

Table 810    Wind Tunnel Simulations for Tuen Mun WTW

Test No.

Release Location

Release Type

Release Rate or Quantity

Wind Direction (degrees)

1

Southeast corner of Chlorine Store

Instantaneous

500kg

360, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, 300, 330

2

Access Road

Instantaneous

50kg

360, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300

3

Access Road

Continuous

5kg/s

260, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300

 

Scaling of LD Contours

8.6.14         To model various chlorine dispersion scenarios, scaling factors were derived to modify the cloud contours to estimate the consequences in different scenarios.

8.6.15         Rotational transformation is adopted for “wind smoothing” purpose. Cloud dispersion contours are re-generated every 10° in wind direction using the closest wind direction contour.

8.6.16         Based on the wind tunnel data, factors are applied to scale up/down wind tunnel data for various release quantities and wind speed. However, effect of stability class on the cloud geometry is considered not significant.  Horizontal scaling factor follows ½ power law for release mass and a simple scaling factor 0.7 is applied for wind speed 5ms-1. Overall scaling factors of various scenarios are given in Table 8‑11 below.

Table 811    Scaling Factors for Release Events

Scenario Reference

Release Case

Horizontal scaling factor (1/2 power law)

Wind speed factor (D2)

Wind speed factor (D5)

Overall scaling factor (D2)

Overall scaling factor (D5)

RU50MML

5 kg/s continuous release

1

1

0.7

1

0.7

RU50SRU

50 kg instantaneous

1

1

0.7

1

0.7

EU50MRU1

150 kg instantaneous

1.7

1

0.7

1.7

1.19

EU50MRU2

1400kg  instantaneous

1.7

1

0.7

1.7

1.19

EU50MRUH

1400kg  instantaneous

1.7

1

0.7

1.7

1.19

 

8.6.17         These scaled contours are served as the consequence input for the RISKSUM.

8.7                   Risk Assessment

General

8.7.1             By combining the results of frequency estimation and consequence analysis, risk levels of the assessment scenarios are characterised in terms of individual risk (presented in individual risk contours plots) and societal risk (presented in FN curves and Potential of Loss of Life).  This integration of risks is processed using RISKSUM software.

8.7.2             All hazardous scenarios identified are modelled using RISKSUM.

Individual Risk

8.7.3             With the event frequencies, scaled LD contours and the population distributions, the individual risk contours is produced and presented in Figure 8.5.

8.7.4             For the 10-5 per year individual risk contour, it can be seen that it extends beyond the site boundary to the immediate south west of the chlorine store. However, this area is an unpopulated cut slope adjacent to the site and therefore risk to actual offsite individual complies with the Risk Guidelines.

 

Risk to Population (Construction Stage - Year 2009)

8.7.5             The societal risk results for the Year 2009, with and without TMR widening works, are presented in Figure 8.6 in a form of FN curves for comparison with the Government Risk Guidelines.

8.7.6             From Figure 8.6, it is demonstrated that there is an insignificant increase in risk to nearby populations as well as construction workers at Tsing Tin Interchange. The FN curves are located in the low ALARP region of the criteria.

8.7.7             The societal risk to the construction site workers at TMR work site lies in the acceptable region as indicated in Figure 8.6. Therefore, societal risk to construction workers is considered acceptable.

Risk to Population (Operation Stage - Year 2024)

8.7.8             The societal risk results for Year 2024 are presented in Figure 8.7 in a form of FN curve for comparison with the Government Risk Guidelines.  The FN curves of the Year 2024 case are located in the low ALARP region of the criteria.

8.7.9             The FN curve for the TMR population at Tsing Tin Interchange after road widening is plotted in Figure 8.7 and lies in the acceptable region. Therefore, the societal risk to transient TMR population is considered acceptable.

Summary

8.7.10         Risks in terms of Individual Risk (IR) and Societal Risk are determined using RISKSUM. The IR at the TMR widening work site is determined less than 1E-8 per year that is far below the acceptance IR criteria (1E-5 per year).

8.7.11         The FN curves demonstrated that there is no substantial increase in societal risk during construction and the increase in traffic in TMR for Year 2009 and Year 2024 respectively.

8.8                   Identification and Analysis of Mitigation Measures

General

8.8.1             The societal risks of the TMWTW, identified in Section 8.7 and plotted in the FN Curves, have been shown to lie in the low ALARP region of the Risk Guideline. Therefore, mitigation measures have been identified and analysed.

8.8.2             The mitigation measures identification exercise included a review on the candidate mitigation measures proposed in the EIA Study Report of Route 8 (Formerly Route 16).

8.8.3             The following sub-sections presented the candidate risk mitigation measures which are relevant to current study and the results of the Cost-Benefit-Analysis (CBA) of these measures.

Review of Candidate Risk Mitigation Measures of Route 8 Study

8.8.4             Operation and Construction stage risk mitigation measures of the Route 8 project are reviewed with WSD and HyD. Measures, that are relevant and applicable to the current project, are selected for CBA and presented in Table 8‑12

Table 812    Candidate Risk Mitigation Measures

Reference

Measures

Remarks

Operation Stage

A

Provision of Road Enclosure

To be assessed in CBA.

Construction Stage

B

Suspension of construction work during chlorine deliveries

To be assessed in CBA.

C

Enhance emergency response arrangements, e.g. provision of visual and audible alarms, training etc.

Provision of a means of alerting construction workers in case of chlorine release is considered an effective mitigation measure. Therefore, it is recommended to implement as a good practice.

 

8.8.5             Assumptions of the relevant measures for further analysis by CBA are listed in Table 8‑13.

Table 813    Assumptions of Mitigation Measures for CBA

Options

Details provisions

Project Stage

A

Provision of 500m of Road Enclosure at Tsing Tin Interchange of TMR (section of TMR with LD30 Contour reach)

Operation

B

Suspension of construction work during chlorine deliveries (4 hours works suspension and 125 truck delivery per year)

Construction

 

Analysis of Mitigation Measures

 

8.8.6             In this study, the cost effectiveness is assessed by CBA using calculation of the Implied Cost of Averting Fatality (ICAF) for each mitigation measures identified. The ICAF is calculated using the equation as follows by taking into account the reduction in potential loss of life (PLL) using calculation

 

ICAF =

Cost of Mitigation Measure

(Reduction in PLL Value x Design Life of Mitigation Measure)

 

8.8.7             The ICAF can be compared with the value of life (proposed to be HK$33M in this study) to determine whether the implementation of the identified mitigation measures is reasonably practicable.

8.8.8             Aversion factor of 20 (Maximum Aversion Factor for risks at the upper region of the Risk Guidelines) is proposed to adjust the Value of Life to reflect people’s aversion to high risk. This is a conservative factor adopted even though the FN curves located at the low ALARP region. With this factor applied, the adjusted Value of Life of HK$660M will be adopted.

8.8.9             The costs of implementation of these two options have been estimated and are presented as follows.

8.8.10         For Option A, it is conservatively assumed that the cost of construction of the enclosure to be HK$150,000 per metre. This cost was previously adopted in the Route 8 study. Therefore, a total cost of HK$75M is estimated to construct the 500m enclosure in TMR at Tsing Tin Interchange. 

8.8.11         With the enclosure, the population associated with the chlorine-affected area assumed to be relocated to the portals of the enclosure (outside the cloud affect zone). Hence the reduction of the PLL would be 4.74E-7.

8.8.12         For a design life of the mitigation measures assumed to be 50 years, the ICAF for this option would be HK$ 3,165,111M.

8.8.13         For Option B, it is assumed that 4 hours works suspension is required due to delivery of chlorine to TMWTW and on average HK$100 per hour for each worker. In the 2 years construction period, total of 250 delivery of chlorine is estimated (125 truck delivery per year adopted as a conservative estimation). Therefore, a cost of HK$ 2M is required. Therefore, the ICAF for option B is estimated to be HK$19,481,408M.

8.8.14         The finding of the CBA is summarised in Table 8-14.

 

Table 814    Results of CBA

Options

Estimated Cost (HK$M)

PLL Reduction

Design Life (Years)

ICAF (HK$M)

Cost-effective Measures

A

75

4.74E-7

50

3,165,111

No (>HK$660M)

B

2

5.13E-8

2

19,481,408

No (>HK$660M)

 

8.8.15         From Table 8-14, it is demonstrated that both mitigation measures are not cost-effective and not reasonably practicable to implement.

8.8.16         To evaluate the justifiable expenditure on risk mitigation measures at this risk level, Maximum Justifiable Expenditure (MJE) are determined as follows.

MJE =

Decrease in PLL Value (per year) x Value of Life (HK$) x operating life time of Widen TMR (years) x aversion factor

 

8.8.17         For construction stage (Year 2009), the PLL at TMR worksite is found to be 5.13E-8 (per year). Therefore, the MJE for Year 2009, given below, is calculated to HK$68.

MJE (Construction)  =

5.13E-8 x 33E6 x 2 x 20

= HK$68

 

8.8.18         The PLL at TMR is found to be 3.89E-7 (per year) and 4.74E-7 (per year) for Year 2009 and Year 2024 respectively. Therefore, the MJE for Year 2024, given below, is calculated to be HK$2805.

MJE (Operation)  =

(4.74E-7-3.89E-7) x 33E6 x 50 x 20

= HK$2805

 

8.8.19         From the MJE, expenditure of HK$2805 or below is justified to spend to reduce the level of risk due to the project.

8.8.20         In view that both options A and B assessed are considered not cost effective to implement, only the recommended good practice measure (Option “C”) as mentioned in Table 8‑12 are recommended. Details of option “C” are presented in subsequent section 8.9.

8.9                   Recommended Measures

8.9.1             The assessment evaluated the risk associated with the TMWTW to the nearby population including the increase of traffic in TMR in Year 2009 and Year 2024.

8.9.2             There is no substantial increase of risk to construction workers, nearby population and transient population due to widening of the TMR during construction stage and operation stage.

8.9.3             Two Candidate mitigation measures were identified and analysed using CBA. Both options assessed are not cost-effective and reasonably practicable to implement. However, the following measures are provided for HyD to implement during construction stage of the Widening works.

a)            The number of workers on site during construction stage should be kept as the level as assessed in this report.

b)            Emergency evacuation procedures should be formulated and HyD should ensure that all workers on site should be familiar with these procedures as well as the route to escape in case of gas release incident occur. Relevant Departments, such as WSD and FSD, should be consulted during the development of Emergency procedures. Diagram showing the escape routes to a safe place should be posted in the site notice boards and at the entrance/exit of site.

c)            The emergency procedures should specify means of providing a rapid and direct warning (e.g. Siren and Flashing Light) to construction workers in the event of chlorine gas release in the TMWTW.

d)            The construction site officer of HyD should establish a communication channel with the TMWTW operation personnel during construction stage. In case of any hazardous incidents in the treatment works, operation personnel of TMWTW should advise the site officer to evacuate the construction workers.

8.9.4             Induction Training should be provided to any staff before working on site at the Tsing Tin Interchange work site.

8.9.5             Periodic drills, with the participation of WSD, should be coordinated and conducted to ensure all construction staffs are familiar with the evacuation procedures. Upon completion of the drills, a review on every step taken should be conducted to identify area of improvement.

8.10               Conclusion

8.10.1         A hazard assessment has been conducted following the criteria for evaluating hazard to life as stated in Annexes 4 and 22 of the TM (Hong Kong Risk Guidelines).  The assessment has reviewed and evaluated hazardous scenarios from TMWTW to both the construction and operation stages of the Widening Work of the TMR at Tsing Tin Interchange. 

8.10.2         Hazardous scenarios associated with the chlorine storage and on-site transport of chlorine in the TMWTW and the respective occurrence frequencies have been identified and confirmed by reviewing of historical hazardous incident database to ensure hazards and its respective occurrence frequencies are acceptable for use.

8.10.3         A QRA expressing population risks in both individual and societal terms has been conducted to evaluate the risk to population in the vicinity of the TMWTW. This assessment considered the future growth of nearby population and the increase of traffic flow in future due to the opening of the HK-SWC and DBL.

8.10.4         From the results of the QRA, individual risk at the construction site is found to be less than 1E-08 per year which is acceptable in comparison with the criteria (1E-05 per year) in the Risk Guidelines. With respect to societal risk, the FN curves indicated that no significant change in the risk level during construction stage (Year 2009) and Operation Stage (Year 2024) of the project when compared with the baselines FN curve. 

8.10.5         Furthermore, no construction hazard was identified that would affect the storage, use or transport of chlorine in the TMWTW.

8.10.6         Mitigation measures have been identified and demonstrated by CBA that selected measures are not cost-effective to implement.

8.10.7         Recommended “good practice” measures for the construction period are given in order to ensure that the construction workers in the project site would understand the evacuation procedures when working in the consultation zone of the TMWTW.

8.10.8         In conclusion, the risks during construction and operation of the TMR project are considered to be reduced to as low as reasonably practicable with the implementation of the “Good Practice” measures during construction period.