1. BACKGROUND

1.1 An application (No. ESB-036/1999) for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study brief under section 5(1) of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) was submitted by the Applicant on 4 August 1999 with a Project Profile (No. PP-055/1999).

1.2 The Applicant proposes to rehabilitate the former Mount Butler Quarry site and to develop the site to accommodate about 1,000 high-class housing units. In association with the development, a section of Mount Butler Road (i.e. local road) between the quarry site and Henderson Road will be widened. Landscaping works for the rehabilitation of the quarry, and roadwork and slope works for the widening of Mount Butler Road will encroach upon the Tai Tam Country Park. The landscaping works for rehabilitation of the quarry will also encroach upon the Water Supplies Department's water gathering ground for Tai Tam. The extent of these encroachments will be determined in the forthcoming engineering feasibility study to be commissioned by the Applicant. The study area of the engineering feasibility study is slightly more than 20 hectare.

1.3 Pursuant to section 5(7)(a) of the EIAO, the Director of Environmental Protection (the Director) issues this EIA study brief to the Applicant to carry out an EIA study.

1.4 The purpose of this EIA study is to provide information on the nature and extent of environmental impacts arising from the construction and operation of the proposed designated projects and related activities taking place concurrently. This information will contribute to decisions by the Director on :

1. the overall acceptability of any adverse environmental consequences that are likely to arise as a result of the proposed project;

2. the conditions and requirements for the detailed design, construction and operation of the proposed project to mitigate against adverse environmental consequences wherever practicable; and

3. the acceptability of residual impacts after the proposed mitigation measures are implemented.

2. OBJECTIVES OF THE EIA STUDY

2.1 The objectives of the EIA study are as follows:

1. to describe the proposed project and associated works together with the requirements for carrying out the proposed project;

2. to identify and describe elements of community and environment likely to be affected by the proposed project and/or likely to cause adverse impacts to the proposed project, including natural and man-made environment;

3. to identify and quantify emission sources and determine the significance of impacts on sensitive receivers and potential affected uses;

4. to identify and quantify any potential losses or damage to flora, fauna and natural habitats;

5. to describe, identify and quantify any potential landscape and visual impacts and determine the significance of impacts on sensitive receivers;

6. to propose the provision of infrastructure or mitigation measures so as to minimize pollution, environmental disturbance and nuisance during construction and operation of the project;

7. to identify, predict and evaluate the residual (i.e. after practicable mitigation) environmental impacts and the cumulative effects expected to arise during the construction and operation phases of the project in relation to the sensitive receivers and potential affected uses;

8. to identify, assesses and specify methods, measures and standards, to be included in the detailed design, construction and operation of the project which are necessary to mitigate these environmental impacts and reducing them to acceptable levels;

9. to investigate the extent of side effects of proposed mitigation measures that may lead to other forms of impacts;

10. to identify constraints associated with the mitigation measures recommended in the EIA study;

11. to identify, within the study area, any individual project(s) that fall under Schedule 2 of the EIA Ordinance; to ascertain whether the findings of this EIA study have adequately addressed the environmental impacts of those projects; and, where necessary, to identify the outstanding issues that need to be addressed in any further detailed EIA study; and

12. to design and specify environmental monitoring and audit requirements, if required, to ensure the implementation and the effectiveness of the environmental protection and pollution control measures adopted.

3. DETAILED REQUIREMENTS OF THE EIA STUDY

3.1 The Purpose

The purpose of this study brief is to scope the key issues of the EIA study. The Applicant has to demonstrate in the EIA report that the criteria in the relevant sections of the Technical Memorandum on the Environmental Impact Assessment Process of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (hereinafter referred to as the TM) are fully complied with.

3.2 The Scope

The scope of this EIA study shall cover the proposed works area shown in Drawing No. HSD 9B of the Project Profile (No. PP-055/1999) and shall include the proposed projects mentioned in section 1.2 above. The EIA study shall address the likely key issues described below; together with any other key issues identified during the course of the EIA study:

1. the dust and noise impacts arising from the quarry rehabilitation works, and the environmental impacts of the quarry afteruse;

2. the environmental impacts on the existing stream course and the water gathering ground in the lower and upper part of the site respectively affected by the development;

3. the environmental impacts in the Tai Tam Country Park;

4. likely land contamination caused by the bomb disposal and firing range activities;

5. likely land contamination caused by the industrial establishment and quarry operations; and

6. likely health hazards caused by the electromagnetic signals from the nearby radio stations.

3.3 Technical Requirements

The Applicant shall conduct the EIA study to address all environmental aspects of the activities as described in the scope as set out above. The EIA study shall include the following technical requirements on specific impacts.

3.3.1 Air Quality Impact

3.3.1.1 The Applicant shall follow the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessing air quality impacts as stated in Annexes 4 and 12 of the TM, respectively.

3.3.1.2 The study area for air quality impact shall generally be defined by a distance of 500m from the boundary of proposed works area shown in Drawing No. HSD 9B of the Project Profile (No. PP-055/1999).

3.3.1.3 The constructional and operational air quality impact assessment shall include the following :

1. analysis of rehabilitation activities and its characteristics and operational activities of the widened Mount Butler Road.

2. Presentation of background air quality in the study area for the purpose of evaluating the cumulative air quality impacts of the activities in (i).

3. Identification and description of representative existing air sensitive receivers (ASRs) and planned/committed air sensitive uses that would likely be affected by the air emissions of the activities in (i). The locations shall be agreed with the Air Policy Group of the Environmental Protection Department and a map showing the location of every identified ASRs shall also be given.

4. Identification of emission characteristics and provision of emission inventory of the air pollution sources.

5. Description of the assessment method and the associated assumptions, validity of the method and limits of application. The methodology used shall be agreed with the Air Policy Group of the Environmental Protection Department before commencement of study.

6. Assessment and evaluation of the net and cumulative air quality impacts of the air emissions at the identified ASRs. (Quantitative whenever applicable).

7. Presentation of the predicted residual air quality impacts (both unmitigated and mitigated) in the form of summary tables and pollution contours, whenever practicable, for comparison with relevant air quality standards and the examination of the land use implications of these impacts.

8. Proposals of appropriate mitigation measures to reduce the cumulative air pollution impacts to established standards.

9. If there are any direct technical noise remedies recommended in the study, the air quality implication due to these remedies shall be assessed. For instance, if barriers that will affect dispersion of air pollutants are proposed, then the implications of such remedies on air quality impact shall be assessed. If enclosure is proposed, then both "tunnel" portal emissions and air quality inside the "tunnel" shall also be addressed.

10. Submission of one set of all input and output file(s) of the model run(s) in electronic format to the Air Policy Group of the Environmental Protection Department .

3.3.1.4 For Construction Impacts of the Mount Butler Road, the Applicant shall also follow the requirements of the Air Pollutant Control (construction Dust) Regulation in dust control and shall initiate an audit and monitoring program during constructional stage to ensure construction dust impacts are controlled within the relevant standards as stipulated in Annex 4 of the TM.

3.3.2 Noise Impact

3.3.2.1 The Applicant shall follow the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessing noise impact as stated in Annexes 5 and 13 of the TM, respectively.

3.3.2.2 The noise impact assessment shall include the following :

1. Determination of Assessment Area

   The area for the noise impact assessment shall generally include all areas within 300m from the proposed works boundary shown in Drawing No. HSD 9B of the Project Profile (No. PP-055/1999). Subject to the agreement of the Director, the assessment area could be reduced accordingly if the first layer of noise sensitive receivers, closer than 300m from the outer project limit, provides acoustic shielding to those receivers at further distance behind.

2. Provision of Background Information and Existing Noise Levels

   The Applicant shall provide all background information relevant to the project, e.g. relevant previous or current studies. Unless involved in the planning standards, e.g. those for planning of fixed noise sources, no existing noise levels are particularly r-equired.

3. Identification of Noise Sensitive Receivers

   1. The Applicant shall refer to Annex 13 of the TM when identifying the noise sensitive receivers (NSRs). The NSRs shall include all existing NSRs and all planned/committed noise sensitive developments and uses earmarked on the relevant Outline Zoning Plans, Outline Development Plans and Layout Plans.

   2. The Applicant shall select assessment points to represent all identified NSRs for carrying out quantitative noise assessment described below. The assessment points shall be agreed with the Director prior to the quantitative noise assessment. A map showing the location and description such as name of building, use, and floors of each and every selected assessment point shall be given. For planned noise sensitive land uses without committed site layouts, the Applicant should use the relevant planning parameters to work out site layouts for operational noise assessment purpose.

4. Provision of an Emission Inventory of the Noise Sources

   The Applicant shall provide an inventory of noise sources (e.g. construction equipment for construction noise assessment). For road projects, the inventory shall include the road traffic data. Confirmation of the validity of the inventory shall be obtained from the relevant government departments/authorities.

5. Construction Noise Assessment

   1. The Applicant shall carry out assessment of noise impact from construction (excluding percussive piling) of the project during day time, i.e. 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., on weekdays other than general holidays in accordance with the methodology stipulated in paragraphs 5.3. and 5.4 of Annex 13 of the TM. The criteria in Table 1B of Annex 5 of the TM shall be adopted in the assessment.

   2. To minimize the construction noise impact, alternative construction methods to replace percussive piling shall be proposed as far as practicable.

   3. If the unmitigated construction noise levels are found exceeding the relevant criteria, the Applicant shall propose practicable direct mitigation measures (including movable barriers, enclosures, quieter alternative methods, re-scheduling and restricting hours of operation of noisy task) to minimize the impact. If the mitigated noise levels still exceed the relevant criteria, the duration of the noise exceedance shall be given.

   4. In case the applicant would like to evaluate whether construction works in restricted hours as defined under the Noise Control Ordinance (NCO) are feasible or not in the context of programming construction works, reference should be made to the relevant technical memoranda issued under the NCO. Regardless of the results of the construction noise impact assessment for restricted hours, the Noise Control Authority will process the Construction Noise Permit (CNP) application, if necessary, based on the NCO, the relevant technical memoranda issued under the NCO, and the contemporary conditions/situations. This aspect should be explicitly stated in the noise chapter and the conclusions and recommendations chapter in the EIA report.

6. Assessment of Side Effects and Constraints

   The Applicant shall identify, assess and propose means to minimize any side effects and to resolve any potential constraints due to the inclusion of any recommended direct technical remedies.

7. Evaluation of Constraints on Planned Noise Sensitive Developments/Landuses

   For planned noise sensitive uses which will still be affected even with all practicable direct technical remedies in place, the Applicant shall propose, evaluate and confirm the practicality of additional measures within the planned noise sensitive uses and shall make recommendations on how these noise sensitive uses will be designed for the information of relevant parties.

   The Applicant shall take into account agreed environmental requirements / constraints identified by the study to assess the development potential of concerned sites which shall be made known to the relevant parties.

3.3.3 Water Pollution

3.3.3.1 The Applicant shall follow the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessing water pollution as stated in Annexes 6 and 14 of the TM, respectively.

3.3.3.2 The assessment area for the purpose of this water quality assessment shall cover the project area shown in Drawing No. HSD 9B of the Project Profile (No. PP-055/1999), plus any stream course, water catchment areas and water gathering ground and the associated water system in the vicinity that may be affected by the project.

3.3.3.3 The Applicant shall identify and analyse in the assessment all physical, chemical and biological disruptions of surface and ground water systems arising from the construction and operation of the project.

3.3.3.4 The Applicant shall include the following in the water quality impact assessment:

1. collection and review of background information on the existing water system(s) and the respective catchment(s);

2. characterization of water and sediment quality based on existing information or site surveys/tests as appropriate;

3. identification and analysis of all existing and future activities and beneficial uses related to the water system(s) and identification of all water sensitive receivers;

4. identification of pertinent water and sediment quality objectives, criteria and standards for the water system(s) and all the sensitive receivers;

5. identification of any alteration of any water courses, natural streams/ponds, change of flow regimes, change of ground water levels, change of catchment types or areas;

6. identification, analysis and quantification of all existing and future water and sediment pollution sources, including point discharges and non-point sources to surface water runoff, and analysis of the provision and adequacy of future facilities to reduce such pollution. An emission inventory on the quantities and characteristics of all these existing and future pollution sources in the assessment area shall also be provided. Field investigation and laboratory tests, as appropriate, shall be conducted to fill in any relevant information gaps;

7. prediction and quantification of impacts on the water system(s) and the sensitive receivers due to those alterations and changes identified in (v) above and the pollution sources identified in (vi) above. Possible impacts include change in hydrology, flow regime, sediment erosion or deposition, water and sediment quality and the effects on the aquatic organism due to such changes. The prediction shall include possible different construction stages or sequences, and different operation stages;

   Cumulative impacts due to other projects, activities or pollution sources within a boundary around the assessment area, subject to the agreement of the Director shall also be predicted and quantified.

8. assessment and quantification of all existing and future waste water generation activities and analysis on the adequacy of existing and future sewerage infrastructure;

9. proposal for upgrading or providing any effective infrastructure, water pollution prevention and mitigation measures to be implemented during the construction and operation stages so as to reduce the water and sediment quality impacts to within standards. Requirements to be incorporated in the project contract document shall also be proposed;

10. best management practices to reduce storm water and non-point source pollution shall be investigated and proposed as appropriate; and

11. evaluation and quantification of residual impacts on the water system(s) and the sensitive receivers with regard to the appropriate water and sediment quality objectives, criteria, standards or guidelines.

3.3.4 Waste Management Implications

3.3.4.1 The Applicant shall follow the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessing waste management implications as stated in Annexes 7 and 15 of the TM, respectively.

3.3.4.2 The assessment of waste management implications shall cover the following :

1. Analysis of Activities and Waste Generation

   The Applicant shall identify the quantity, quality and timing of the waste arising as a result of the construction and operation activities, based on the sequence and duration of these activities.

2. Proposal for Waste Management

   1. Prior to considering the disposal options for various types of wastes, opportunities for reducing waste generation shall be fully evaluated.

   2. Having been taken into account all the opportunities for reducing waste generation, the types and quantities of the wastes required to be disposed of as a consequence shall be estimated and the disposal options for each type of waste described in detail. The disposal method recommended for each type of wastes shall take into account the result of the assessment in (c) below.

   3. The impact caused by handling (including labelling, packaging & storage), collection, and disposal of wastes shall be addressed in detail. This assessment shall cover the following areas :
      - potential hazard;
      - air and odour emissions;
      - noise;
      - wastewater discharge; and
      - public transport.

3.3.5 Land Contamination Impact

3.3.5.1 The Applicant shall provide a clear and detailed account of the present use of the land (e.g. description of the activities, chemicals and hazardous substances handled with a clear indication of their storage and location by reference to a site map) and the relevant past land history in relation to possible land contamination (e.g. accident records, change of land use, etc.).

3.3.5.2 During the execution of the EIA study, the Applicant shall submit a contamination assessment plan (CAP) to the Director for endorsement before conducting the land contamination impact assessment of the land/site. The CAP shall include proposals on sampling and analysis required and shall aim at determining the nature and the extent of the contamination of the land/site.

3.3.5.3 Based on the endorsed CAP, the Applicant shall conduct a land contamination impact assessment. If land contamination is confirmed, a remedial action plan shall be prepared to formulate necessary remedial measures.

3.3.5.4 The potential contaminated land shall be assessed in accordance with the guidelines for potential contaminated land issues as given in section 3 of Annex 19 of TM.

3.3.6 Ecological Impact

3.3.6.1 The Applicant shall follow the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessing ecological impact as stated in Annexes 8 and 16 of the TM, respectively.

3.3.6.2 The assessment area for the purpose of this ecological impact assessment shall include all areas within 500 m distance from the project area as shown in Drawing No. HSD 9B of the Project Profile (No. PP-055/1999), or the area likely to be impacted by the project.

3.3.6.3 In the ecological impact assessment, the Applicant shall examine the flora, fauna and other components of the ecological habitats within the assessment area. The aim shall be to protect, maintain or rehabilitate the natural environment. In particular, the proposed project shall avoid impacts on recognized sites of conservation importance and other ecological sensitive areas. The assessment shall identify and quantify as far as possible the potential ecological impacts associated with the project.

3.3.6.4 The assessment shall include the following :

1. review the findings of relevant studies and collate all the available information regarding the ecological characters of the assessment area;

2. evaluate the information collected and identify any information gap relating to the assessment of potential ecological impacts to the terrestrial and aquatic environment;

3. carry out necessary field surveys, which shall cover at least 4 months including wet season, and investigations to verify the information collected, fill the information gaps identified and fulfill the objectives of the EIA study;

4. establish the general ecological profile and describe the characteristics of each habitat found; major information to be provided shall include :

   1. description of the physical environment;

   2. habitat maps of suitable scale (1:1000 to 1:5000) showing the types and locations of habitats in the assessment area;

   3. ecological characteristics of each habitat type such as size, vegetation type, species present, dominant species found, species diversity and abundance, community structure, inter-dependence of the habitats and species, and presence of any features of ecological importance;

   4. representative colour photos of each habitat type and any important ecological features identified;

   5. species found that are rare, endangered and/or listed under local legislation, international conventions for conservation of wildlife/habitats or red data books;

5. investigate and describe the existing wildlife uses of various habitats with special attention to woodlands, natural stream courses and any other habitats and wildlife groups identified as having special conservation interests by this study;

6. describe all recognized sites of conservation importance in the proposed development site and its vicinity and assess whether these sites will be affected by the proposed development or not;

7. using suitable methodology, identify and quantify as far as possible any direct, indirect, on-site, off-site, primary, secondary and cumulative ecological impacts such as destruction of habitats, reduction of species abundance/diversity, loss of feeding grounds, reduction of ecological carrying capacity and habitat fragmentation;

8. evaluate the significance and acceptability of the ecological impacts identified using well-defined criteria;

9. recommend all possible alternatives (such as modifications of layout and design) and practicable mitigation measures to avoid, minimize and/or compensate for the adverse ecological impacts identified;

10. evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the recommended mitigation measures and define the scope, type, location, implementation arrangement, subsequent management and maintenance of such measures;

11. determine and quantify as far as possible the residual ecological impacts after implementation of the proposed mitigation measures;

12. evaluate the severity and acceptability of the residual ecological impacts using well-defined criteria. If off-site mitigation measures are considered necessary to mitigate the residual impacts, the guidelines and requirements laid down in the PELB Technical Circular No. 1/97 shall be followed; and

13. review the need for and recommend any ecological monitoring programme required.

3.3.7 Landscape and Visual Impact

3.3.7.1 The Applicant shall follow the criteria and guidelines as stated in Annexes 10 and 18 of the TM, respectively for evaluating and assessing landscape and visual impacts. Both the impacts during construction and operation phases shall be assessed.

3.3.7.2 The study area for the landscape impact assessment shall include all areas within a 500m distance from the proposed project. The study area for the visual impact assessment shall be defined by the visual envelope of the proposed project.

3.3.7.3 The Applicant shall review relevant outline development plan(s), outline zoning plan(s), layout plan(s) or planning briefs and studies which may contain guidelines on urban design concept, designated view corridors, and open space network affecting the appreciation of the project. The aim is to gain an insight to the future outlook of the area affected and the ways that the project can fit into the environment. Any conflict with the statutory town plans should be highlighted and appropriate follow-up action should be recommended. The Applicant shall attempt to preserve the ridgeline at the back of the site when viewed from major vantage points in the main urban areas.

3.3.7.4 The Applicant shall describe, appraise and analyze the existing landscape resources and character of the assessment area. The sensitivity of the landscape framework and its ability to accommodate change shall be particularly focused on. The Applicant shall identify the degree of compatibility of the proposed project with the existing landscape. The landscape impact assessment shall quantify the potential landscape impact as far as possible so as to illustrate the significance of such impacts arising from the proposed development. Clear mapping of the landscape impact is required. When applicable, a tree survey shall be carried out and the impacts on existing mature trees shall be addressed.

3.3.7.5 The Applicant shall assess the visual impacts of the proposed project. Clear mapping of the visual impact is required. The assessment shall include the following :

1. identification and plotting of visibility contours of the proposed project within the assessment area;

2. identification of the key groups of sensitive receivers within the visibility contours with regard to views from both ground level and elevated vantage points;

3. description of the visual compatibility of the project with the surrounding and the planned setting, and its obstruction and interference with key views of the adjacent areas; and

4. the severity of visual impacts in terms of distance, nature and number of sensitive receivers shall be identified. The visual impacts of the project with and without mitigation measures shall be included so as to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures.

3.3.7.6 The Applicant shall recommend mitigation measures to minimize the adverse effects identified above, including provision of a landscape design. The mitigation measures shall also include the retention of vegetation, transplanting of mature trees, provision of screen planting, re-vegetation of disturbed land, compensatory planting, provisioning and reprovisioning of amenity areas and open spaces, design of structures, provision of finishes to structures, colour scheme and texture of material used, and any measures to mitigate the disturbance of the existing land use. Parties shall be identified for the management and maintenance of any proposed mitigation measures to ensure their effectiveness throughout the operation phase of the proposed project. A practical programme and funding proposal for the implementation of the recommended measures shall also be worked out. For bridge structures : Presentation of photomontage of the proposed road(s) in the existing and planning urban setting illustrating the effectiveness of visual impact mitigation measures shall be included.

3.3.7.7 Perspective drawings, plans and section/elevation diagrams, annotated oblique aerial photographs, photographs taken at vantage points, photographs on scaled physical models, photo-retouching and photo-montage shall be adopted when appropriate to illustrate the landscape and visual impacts of he proposed project. The Applicant shall record the technical details in preparing the illustration, which may need to be submitted for verification of the accuracy of the illustration.

3.3.7.8 Perspective drawings, plans and section/elevation diagrams, annotated oblique aerial photographs, photographs taken at vantage points, photographs on scaled physical models, photo-retouching and photo-montage shall be adopted when appropriate to illustrate the landscape and visual impacts of the proposed project. The Applicant shall record the technical details in preparing the illustration, which may need to be submitted for verification of the accuracy of the illustration.

3.3.8 Impact from the Radio Station

The Applicant shall assess whether the occupants of the housing units will be affected by the high frequency signal transmitted from the marine vessels and the air crafts to the Radio Communications Station located to the north of the site. If they are found to be affected, the Applicant shall assess whether the radio-frequency electromagnetic field at the proposed housing units meets the requirements of the Code of Practice for Protection of Workers and members of the Public Against Non-Ionizing Radiation Hazards from Radio Transmitting Equipment issued by the Office of the Telecommunications Authority.

3.3.9 Summary of Environmental Outcomes

The EIA report shall contain a summary of the key environmental outcomes arising from the EIA study, including the population and environmentally sensitive areas protected, environmentally friendly designs recommended, key environmental problems avoided, compensation areas included and the environmental benefits of environmental protection measures recommended.

3.3.10 Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Requirements

3.3.10.1 The Applicant shall identify in the EIA study whether there is any need for EM&A and/or environmental management system (EMS) activities during the construction and operation phases of the project and, if affirmative:

1. to define the scope of the EM&A requirements for the project in the EIA study; and/or

2. to set out the EMS requirements for the construction and operation of the project to achieve satisfactory environmental performance.

3.3.10.2 Subject to the confirmation of the EIA study findings, the Applicant shall comply with the requirements as stipulated in Annex 21 of the TM.

3.3.10.3 The Applicant shall prepare a project implementation schedule (in the form of a checklist as shown in Annex 1) containing all the EIA study recommendations and mitigation measures with reference to the implementation programme.

4. DURATION OF VALIDITY

4.1 This EIA study brief is valid for 24 months after the date of issue. If the EIA study does not commence within this period, the Applicant shall apply to the Director for another EIA study brief afresh before commencement of the EIA study.

5. REPORT REQUIREMENTS

5.1 In preparing the EIA report, the Applicant shall refer to Annex 11 of the TM for the contents of an EIA report. The Applicant shall also refer to Annex 20 of the TM, which stipulates the guidelines for the review of an EIA report.

5.2 The Applicant shall supply the Director with the following number of copies of the EIA report and the executive summary :

1. 40 copies of the EIA report in English and 60 copies of the executive summary in both English and Chinese as required under section 6(2) of the EIAO to be supplied at the time of application for approval of the EIA report.

2. when necessary, addendum to the EIA report and the executive summary submitted in (i) above as required under section 7(1) of the EIAO, to be supplied upon advice by the Director for public inspection.

3. 20 copies of the EIA report in English and 50 copies of the executive summary in both English and Chinese, with or without Addendum as required under section 7(5) of the EIAO, to be supplied upon advice by the Director for consultation with Advisory Council on the Environment.

5.3 The Applicant shall make additional copies of the above documents available to the public, subject to payment by the interested parties of full costs of printing.

5.4 In addition, to facilitate the public inspection of the EIA Report via the EIAO Internet Website, the applicant shall provide electronic copies of both the EIA Report and the Executive Summary Report prepared in HyperText Markup Language (HTML) (version 4.0 or later) and in DynaDoc Format (version 3.0 or later) [for Chinese documents] and in Portable Document Format (PDF version 3.0 or later) [for English documents], unless otherwise agreed by the Director. For the HTML version, a content page capable of providing hyperlink to each section and sub-section of the EIA Report and the Executive Summary Report shall be included in the beginning of the document, and all graphics in the report shall be in interlaced GIF format.

5.5 The electronic copies of the EIA report and the Executive Summary shall be submitted to the Director at the time of application for approval of the EIA Report.

5.6 When the EIA Report and the Executive Summary are made available for public inspection under s.7(1) of the EIA Ordinance, the content of the electronic copies of the EIA Report and the Executive Summary must be the same as the hard copies and the Director shall be provided with the most updated electronic copies.

5.7 To promote environmentally friendly and efficient dissemination of information, both hardcopies and electronic copies of future EM&A reports recommended by the EIA study shall be required and their format shall be agreed by the Director.

6. OTHER PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS

6.1 During the EIA study, if there is any change in the name of Applicant for this EIA study brief, the Applicant in this study brief must notify the Director immediately.

6.2 If there is any key change in the scope of the project mentioned in section 1.2 of this EIA study brief and in Project Profile No. PP-055/1999, the Applicant must seek confirmation from the Director in writing on whether or not the scope of issues covered by this EIA study brief can still cover the key changes, and the additional issues, if any, that the EIA study must also address. If the changes to the project fundamentally alter the key scope of the EIA study brief, the Applicant shall apply to the Director for another EIA study brief afresh.

[ Back to Top ] / [ Back to Main Index ] / [ Legislative Framework ]