Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap. 499), Section 5(7)

 

Environmental Impact Assessment Study Brief No. ESB-124/2005

 

 

            Project Title:              Relocation of Yiu Lian Floating Dock No. 3

                                                (hereinafter known as the ¡§Project¡¨)

 

                        Name of Applicant:    Yiu Lian Dockyards Ltd.

                                                            (hereinafter known as the ¡§Applicant¡¨)

 

1.         BACKGROUND

 

            1.1                   An application (No. ESB-124/2005) for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study brief under section 5(1) of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) was submitted by the Applicant on 24 January 2005 with a Project Profile (No. PP-239/2005).

 

1.2       The proposed Project is to decommission the Yiu Lian Floating Dock No. 3 (the Dock) at the Yam O Wan of North Lantau (North Lantau), and to construct and operate the Dock at a proposed location at the South-west coast of Tsing Yi (Tsing Yi) after relocation. As given in the Project Profile, the Dock has a pontoon length of about 287m and breadth of 55m and has been operating at North Lantau for a substantial period of time since late 80s. Present and proposed locations of the Dock at Lantau and Tsing Yi are shown respectively in Figures 1 and 2 (as modified from the plans in the Project Profile ref: PP-239/2005). Key elements of the Project are to:

 

(i)                  Decommission the Dock at North Lantau, and

 

(ii)                Construct and operate the Dock at Tsing Yi.

           

1.3       Pursuant to section 5(7)(a) of the EIAO, the Director of Environmental Protection (the Director) issues this EIA study brief to the Applicant to carry out an EIA study.

 

1.4       The purpose of this EIA study is to provide information on the nature and extent of environmental impacts arising from the Project and related activities taking place concurrently. This information will contribute to decisions by the Director on:

(i)                  the overall acceptability of any adverse environmental consequences that are likely to arise as a result of the Project;

(ii)                the conditions and requirements for the Project to mitigate against adverse environmental consequences wherever practicable; and

(iii)               the acceptability of residual impacts after the proposed mitigation measures are implemented.

2.         OBJECTIVES OF THE EIA STUDY

 

            2.1       The objectives of the EIA study are as follows:

(i)                  to describe the Project and associated works together with the requirements for carrying out the Project;

(ii)                to identify and describe the elements of the community and environment likely to be affected by the Project and/or likely to cause adverse impacts to the Project, including natural and man-made environment and the associated environmental constraints;

(iii)               to identify potential Tributyltin (TBT) and heavy metal contamination in marine sediments due to operation of the Dock in Lantau and ways to minimise and mitigate the impacts;

(iv)              to identify and quantify emission sources and determine the significance of impacts on sensitive receivers and potential affected uses including those along the Sham Tseng coast, especially in respect of marine water and sediment quality impacts;

(v)                to identify mitigation measures for the proposed Dock at Tsing Yi with regard to the risk incidence associated with the Caltex and ExxonMobil West terminals at South-west Tsing Yi;

(vi)              to propose the provision of mitigation measures so as to minimize pollution, environmental disturbance and nuisance arising from the Project;

(vii)             to investigate the feasibility, practicability, effectiveness and implications of the proposed mitigation measures;

(viii)           to identify, predict and evaluate the residual environmental impacts (i.e. after practicable mitigation) and the cumulative effects expected to arise from the Project in relation to the sensitive receivers and potential affected uses;

(ix)              to identify, assess and specify methods, measures and standards, to be included in the detailed design, decommissioning, construction and operation stage of the Project which are necessary to mitigate these environmental impacts and reduce them to acceptable levels;

(x)                to investigate the extent of the secondary environmental impacts that may arise from the proposed mitigation measures and to identify constraints associated with the mitigation measures in the EIA study, as well as the provision of any necessary mitigation measures; 

(xi)              to identify constraints associated with the mitigation measures recommended in the EIA study; and

 

(xii)             to design and specify the environmental monitoring and audit requirements to ensure the effective implementation of the environmental protection and  pollution control measures.

 

            3.         DETAILED REQUIREMENTS OF THE EIA STUDY

 

The Purpose

 

3.1       The purpose of this study brief is to scope the key issues of the EIA study and to specify the environmental issues that are required to be reviewed and assessed in the EIA report.  The Applicant has to demonstrate in the EIA report that the criteria in the relevant sections of the Technical Memorandum on the Environmental Impact Assessment Process of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (hereinafter known as the ¡§TM¡¨) are fully complied with.

 

            The Scope

 

            3.2                   The scope of this EIA study shall cover the Project proposed in the Project Profile and works mentioned in section 1.2 above.  The EIA study shall address the key issues described below, together with any other key issues identified during the course of the EIA study, and the cumulative environmental impacts of the Project, through interaction or in combination with other existing, committed, planned and known potential development in the vicinity of the Project. Key issues include, amongst others:

 

            Decommissioning of the Dock at North Lantau

 

(a)                  the potential TBT and heavy metal contaminated marine sediments caused by  operation of the Dock at Lantau and their handling/treatment method(s);

 

(b)         the potential water quality impacts caused by decommissioning activities, especially when potentially contaminated sediments are disturbed during handling/treatment process;

 

Construction and Operation of the Dock at Tsing Yi

 

(c)                      the potential water quality impacts during handling/disposal of marine sediments caused by construction works;

 

(d)                     practicable means to implement and audit the Applicant¡¦s proposal in section 3.2.2.1 of the Project Profile with regard to receiving ships without TBT containing paints during operation stage of the Dock, and

 

(e)                      the potential operational water quality impacts from wastewater of the Project that might contain anti-fouling chemicals or TBT, where applicable.

 

3.3     Notwithstanding that the study brief has scoped the key issues for assessment, to facilitate public inspection, the EIA shall cover information presented in the Project Profile together with necessary updates, and explain why no adverse impacts are anticipated in certain areas or issues covered by the TM.

 

3.4       Consideration of Alternative Options and Methods in Decommissioning, Construction and Operation

 

3.4.1  Proposed site at Tsing Yi

 

i)          The Applicant shall present considerations for the proposed project siting, and the history of the Project.

 

3.4.2  Consideration of Alternative Options and Methods for the Project

 

Decommissioning of the Dock at North Lantau 

 

i)                    Where the EIA predicts/identifies TBT and heavy metal contamination in marine sediments caused by operation of the Dock, the Applicant shall consider different handling/treatment methods for the contamination. With a view to proposing the best practicable means, a comparison shall be made with regard to environmental benefits and dis-benefits of different approaches to handle/treat the contaminated sediments. The approaches can include, among others, ¡§Leave the sediments in place¡¨, ¡§In-situ or Ex-site treatment¡¨ or disposal as a last resort;

 

ii)                   Where dredging/disturbance of the TBT and heavy metal contaminated marine sediments are unavoidable especially during sediments handling and/or anchor removal, the Applicant shall explore alternative construction methods in order to minimize adverse water quality impacts;

 

 Construction and Operation of the Dock at Tsing Yi

 

iii)                 Where the EIA predicts adverse water quality impacts during construction stage, the Applicant shall explore alternative construction methods and sequences of works, and

 

iv)                 Where the EIA predicts adverse direct/cumulative water quality and sediment deposits impacts to sensitive receivers (including those along the Sham Tseng coast) from wastewater discharge of the Dock, the Applicant shall consider, among others, alternative wastewater treatment methods, discharge locations, work modes, mooring location and layout in order to avoid and minimize adverse environmental impacts during operation stage to the maximum practicable extent.

 

           3.5                     Technical Requirements 

 

The Applicant shall conduct the EIA study to address the environmental aspects of the works and activities as described in the scope set out above.  The EIA study shall include the following technical requirements on specific impacts unless otherwise approved by the Director specifically in writing.

 

3.5.1         Water Quality Impact

 

3.5.1.1  The Applicant shall follow the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessing water pollution as stated in Annexes 6 and 14 of the TM respectively for the Project.

 

3.5.1.2  The study area for the purpose of this water quality impact assessment shall cover   relevant sensitive receivers that have a bearing on the environmental acceptability of the Project within the North Western Water Control Zone, Western Buffer Water Control Zone and part of the Southern Water Control Zone north of Hei Ling Chau. Sensitive receivers include beaches along the Sham Tseng coast.

 

3.5.1.3  The Applicant shall identify and analyse in the assessment respective physical, chemical and biological disruptions of marine water and sediments arising from the Project.

 

3.5.1.4  The applicant shall include the following in the water quality impact assessment:

 

General

(i)                    collection and review of background information on the existing and planned water system(s) and sensitive receivers which might be affected by the Project;

(ii)                  characterization of water quality and sediment quality on the respective water system(s) and sensitive receivers which might be potentially affected by the Project based on existing information or site surveys/tests as appropriate;

(iii)                 identification and analysis of existing and planned future activities (such as respective floating docks operating at Tsing Yi); beneficial uses related to the water system(s) and water sensitive receivers;

(iv)                 identification of pertinent water quality and sediments objectives and establishment of other appropriate water and sediments quality criteria or standards for the water system(s) and sensitive receivers as identified above;

(v)                   establishment of an emission inventory on the quantities and characteristics of pollution sources arising from the Project;

(vi)                 prediction of impacts on the water system(s) and sensitive receivers due to those alterations and changes, and the pollution sources identified above. The prediction shall include different activities and sequences of the Project;

(vii)                assessment of cumulative impacts due to relevant concurrent and planned projects, activities or pollution sources within the identified water system(s). In particular, the cumulative impacts due to other floating docks moored at Tsing Yi shall be assessed during the operation stage;

Impact prediction for decommissioning works at Yam O Wan

(viii)              identification and quantification of dredging, filling and disposal activities together with any proposed fill source and disposal ground. Characterization of marine sediments and mobilization of any contaminants through field investigation, sampling, and chemical laboratory tests including chemical screening for those contaminants listed in Appendix B. The Applicant should submit a plan for the Director¡¦s agreement with regard to the range of investigation parameters; the number, type, location and methods of sampling; sample preservation, and chemical laboratory test method/protocols;

(ix)                 prediction and quantification of impacts on water system(s) and aquatic lifes due to the presence of contaminated sediments based on the chemical screening above. Possible impacts include the effect on benthic organism, aquatic organisms and marine mammal at organismic and ecosystem levels. The Applicant should submit a plan for the Director¡¦s agreement with regard to the study methodology, testing and analysis such as sediment biological toxicity test, bioaccumulation test, sampling and chemical testing of the water column; 

(x)                   evaluation and comparison of alternative handling and treatment methods for the contaminated sediments in accordance with contaminants investigation results in section ix in order to mitigate the impacts to within acceptable limits. These alternatives shall include the ¡§Leave the sediments in place¡¨, ¡§In-situ or Ex-situ treatment¡¨ and ¡§Disposal¡¨ options. The comparison of different options should comprise at least assessment of the associated environmental impacts and identification of any residual environmental impact;

(xi)                 simulation and quantification of degree of mobilization of various contaminants during decommissioning stage by Elutriate tests (USACE) if marine sediments are found to be contaminated. Prediction and quantification of impacts associated with the proposed handling/treatment method above where adverse impacts are anticipated. The possible impacts include changes in sediment erosion or deposition, water and sediment quality and the effect on the aquatic organism due to such activities.  The Applicant shall seek the Director¡¦s agreement whether a mathematical  modeling or other technique should be applied to quantify the impacts. Where a mathematical modeling is necessary to predict and quantify the impacts, the model shall comply with the specifications listed in Appendix C;

Impact prediction during construction stage at Tsing Yi

(xii)                identification and quantification of dredging, filling, and disposal activities during the construction stage. Characterization of marine sediments and mobilization of any contaminants through field investigation, sampling, and chemical laboratory tests including chemical screening for those contaminants listed in Appendix B. The Applicant should submit a plan for the Director¡¦s agreement including the range of investigation parameters to be analyzed; the number, type, location and methods of sampling; sample preservation and chemical laboratory test method/protocols;

(xiii)       simulation and quantification of the degree of mobilization of various contaminants during construction stage by Elutriate tests (USACE)  if marine sediments are found to be contaminated. Prediction and quantification of the marine water quality impacts by techniques approved by the Director where adverse impacts are anticipated. Possible impacts include changes in sediment erosion or deposition, water and sediment quality and the effect on the aquatic organism due to such activities;

Impact prediction during operation stage at Tsing Yi

(xiv)               identification of any physical changes due to operation of the Dock at Tsing Yi;

(xv)                identification and quantification of pollution including existing and likely future water pollution sources. The potential contaminants shall include those caused by ship servicing, in particular due to hull washing and sand blasting of exterior hull surface. An emission inventory on the quantities and characteristics of existing and future pollution sources shall be provided with a view of assessing the cumulative effect. Field investigation and laboratory tests shall be conducted as appropriate;

(xvi)               conduct of a literature /desktop review to identify different types of non-TBT paints commonly used on the market and identification of their characteristics and impacts on the environment arising from ship servicing activities, because the project profile specifies that the Dock will only receive ships using non-TBT containing paint;

(xvii)             prediction and quantification, by mathematical modeling or other technique approved by the Director, of impacts on water system(s) and sensitive receivers, especially those along the Sham Tseng coast, due to alterations and changes and the pollution sources identified. Possible impacts include changes in sediment erosion or deposition, water and sediment quality, the effect on the aquatic organisms and any potential impact on sensitive uses. The mathematical model shall comply with the specifications listed in Appendix C;

Mitigation

(xviii)            proposal to avoid or minimize the adverse impact identified above, in particular suitable handling method for potentially contaminated sediments and/or their  disposal in the decommissioning and construction stages;

 

 

(xix)               proposal of water pollution prevention and mitigation measures to be implemented for the Project so as to reduce the water quality, sediment quality and ecological impacts to within acceptable standards.  Best management practices to reduce waste-water, and non-point source pollution shall be investigated and proposed as appropriate;

(xx)                proposal of practical and effective mitigation measures to be implemented for the Dock at Tsing Yi with regard to:

(a)            the audit of proposal to receive ships without TBT containing paint, and

(b)            management of waste-water from ship-servicing activities that might contain potentially contaminated sediments, and  

(xxi)               evaluation and quantification of residual impacts on the water system(s) and the sensitive receivers with regard to the appropriate water and sediment quality criteria, standards and guidelines.

 

 

3.5.2        Waste Management Implications

 

3.5.2.1  The Applicant shall follow the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessing waste management implications as stated in Annexes 7 and 15 of the TM respectively.

3.5.2.2  <