space space   space
space

Review of Air Quality Objectives

The Environmental Protection Department has, in June 2007, commissioned an 18-month comprehensive study to review Hong Kong's Air Quality Objectives (AQO) and develop a long-term air quality management strategy.

 The Director of Environmental Protection, Ms Anissa Wong Sean-yee (second left), and Assistant Director of Environmental Protection, Mr Tse Chin Wan (first left), are pictured with the representatives of the consultant after signing the agreement for the study to review Hong Kong's Air Quality Objectives and develop a long-term air quality management strategy.
The Director of Environmental Protection, Ms Anissa Wong Sean-yee (second left), and Assistant Director of Environmental Protection, Mr Tse Chin Wan (first left), are pictured with the representatives of the consultant after signing the agreement for the study to review Hong Kong's Air Quality Objectives and develop a long-term air quality management strategy.

The study will examine the latest findings on review of air quality standards by the World Health Organisation, the European Union and the United States. It will also consider factors including protection of public health, cost effectiveness, society's expectation, maturity of the technologies needed, time required for introducing the measures, the need to work with the Mainland as well as impacts on other policy areas such as energy, transportation, industrial development, urban planning and conservation for devising a new set of AQO and a long-term air quality management strategy and measures for Hong Kong.

The review will include a thorough public consultation and engagement process. To ensure that the study is properly conducted, we have set up an Advisory Panel on Review of the Air Quality Objectives and Development of a Long Term Air Quality Strategy to guide the study. The Advisory Panel comprises members from the Advisory Council on the Environment, experts from different sectors, academics of relevant disciplines and representatives from relevant policy bureaux of the Government. The Government expect to finalize the new AQO and the required long-term strategy on air quality management within 2009.

Objectives of the Study
 
The objective of the Study is to assess the need for and the implications of revising Hong Kong's AQO as well as to identify options and propose alternative strategies and plans needed for achieving the revised AQO. Findings and options identified will be used for a comprehensive public engagement process for finalising action on the new AQO and the required long-term strategy on air quality management.
 
Scope of the Study
 
The Study will assess the need for and the implications of revising Hong Kong's AQO as well as to identify options and propose alternative strategies and plans needed for achieving the revised AQO. The scope of the study covers the following–
 
(a)  review and characterize the current state of air quality in Hong Kong, including the prevailing exposure levels, developing trend, major pollution sources and origins, the impacts of external and non-anthropogenic sources on Hong Kong’s air quality, as well as policies, programmes and legislation in place for controlling air pollution and the costs and implications due to air pollution;
 
(b)  examine and make reference to the different reasoning of the WHO and the US EPA in devising their respective air quality guidelines or standards, including concrete research results on long-term and short-term health impacts;
 
(c)  use methods including air modelling to assess air quality under different scenarios and with mitigation measures adopted; to recommend specific measures required and options available to achieve interim targets and the standards if the new WHO AQG are to be adopted; to examine in depth the need for co-operation with neighbouring cities and provinces;
 
(d)  assess the implications of implementing the measures identified under different options, including economic and social costs, the time required for introducing the measures, the need to work with the Mainland and other air quality management authorities outside Hong Kong as well as impacts on other policy areas such as energy, transportation, industrial development, urban planning and conservation;
 
(e)  derive practicable options to revise Hong Kong’s AQO, including whether it is necessary to have different targets for roadside air quality, and to identify strategies and measures required in the form of action plan to achieve the revised AQO, with implications identified for each option, so as to facilitate public participation and comments; and
 
(f)  review the need and means to harmonize air quality monitoring data and air pollution indices with other economically advanced cities to facilitate fair comparison.

Public Consultations

The Environmental Protection Department has conducted two consultation forums – one for the professionals on 18 December 2007 and the other for the general public on 31 January 2008.  You can access the presentation materials and the ensuing discussions at the links given below:

          Consultation Forum for the Professionals (in English only)

          Consultation Forum for the General Public (mainly in Chinese)

Your Comments

If you have any comments or views on the review of AQO, you are welcome to send them to the consultant of the study direct at aqoreviewcomment@arup.com.

International Developments on Air Quality Objective (AQO) Review

We have been monitoring the international developments on review of air quality standards and objectives with a view to examining the need for revising Hong Kong's AQOs from a scientific perspective, taking into account local circumstances. Recent scientific research findings suggest that particulate matters smaller than 2.5 microns have more direct health effects than those of larger sizes. Moreover, the concentration levels of air pollutants capable of affecting human health may be lower than those indicated in previous studies. In view of such findings, in recent years, a number of countries including the United States of America (US), the Member States of the European Union (EU) and the World Health Organisation (WHO) have been examining the need for introducing a new set of air quality standards for particulate matters smaller than 2.5 microns (i.e. PM2.5) and revising the current air quality guidelines and standards.

The WHO announced in October 2006 an updated set of Air Quality Guidelines (AQGs). The new AQGs provide a scientific basis for supporting the development of air quality policies and management strategies in various parts of the world to protect human health. Owing to the stringency of the new AQGs, the WHO has recommended interim targets in the new guidelines for countries to improve their air quality progressively.

The WHO clearly points out that the actual air quality standards set in each country will vary according to the approach adopted for balancing health risks, technological feasibility, economic considerations and various other political and social factors. It also advises that governments should consider their own local circumstances carefully before adopting the new AQGs as statutory standards.

The government of the United Kingdom (UK), in its consultation document published in April 2006, considered it impracticable to fully achieve the air quality standards recommended by the WHO. The UK estimated that it could only meet the standards for some air pollutants, e.g. particulates, by 2050. In July 2007, the UK published their latest Air Quality Strategy introducing new annual average and background exposure reduction for PM2.5 to be achieved by 2020. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced new air quality standards for particulate matters and ozone in late September 2006 and mid-March 2008, respectively. These new standards are less stringent than those in the new WHO AQGs and the years for meeting the targets range from 2014 to 2031. In mid-April 2008, the EU finalised a directive on ambient air quality which includes a PM2.5 annual average standard to be achieved by 2015. Again, this new PM2.5 standard is less stringent than that in the new WHO AQGs.

Related Documents

A Proposal for Reviewing the Air Quality Objectives and Developing a Long-term Air Quality Strategy

Advisory Council on the Environment - Public Forum on Air Quality Objective Review

WHO Air Quality Guidelines for Particulate Matter, Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide and Sulphur Dioxide, Global Update 2005


Existing Air Quality Objectives

Hong Kong's Air Quality Objectives

Air Quality Objectives Compliance Status

Comparison of Hong Kong's Air Quality Objectives with Air Quality Standards of the New WHO Guidelines and other Countries

Links

 Air Quality of Hong Kong

 Air Pollution Index

 Air Quality Reports


 Overseas Air Quality

 New York

 London 

 Tokyo

 Seoul

 Bangkok

 Singapore

 Auckland

 Melbourne

Back to top

 

 
2005 copyright logo| Important notices

Last Revision Date : 06 May 2008