|
Guidelines
on Assessing the 'TOTAL' Air Quality Impacts
1.
Total Impacts - 3 Major Contributions
1.1 In
evaluating the air quality impacts of a proposed project upon
air sensitive receivers, contributions from three classes
of emission sources depending on their distance from the site
should be considered. These are:
| Primary
contributions: |
project
induced |
| Secondary
contributions: |
pollutant-emitting
activities in the immediate neighbourhood |
| Other
contributions: |
pollution
not accounted for by the previous two (Background contributions) |
2.
Nature of Emissions
2.1
Primary contributions
In most
cases, the project-induced emissions are fairly well defined
and quite often (but not necessarily) the major contributor
to local air quality impacts. Examples include those due to
traffic network, building or road construction projects.
2.2
Secondary contributions
Within
the immediate neighbourhood of the project site, there are
usually pollutant emitting activities contributing further
to local air quality impacts. For most local scale projects,
any emission sources in an area within 500m radius of the
project site with notable impacts should be identified and
included in an air quality assessment to cover the short-range
contributions. In the exceptional cases where there is one
or more significant sources nearby, the study area may have
to be extended or alternative estimation approach employed
to ensure these impacts are reasonably accounted for.
2.3
Background contributions
The above
two types of emission contributions should account for, to
a great extent, the air quality impacts upon local air sensitive
receivers, which are often amenable to estimation by the 'Gaussian
Dispersion' type of models. However, a background air quality
level should be prescribed to indicate the baseline air quality
in the region of the project site, which would account for
any pollution not covered by the two preceding contributions.
The emission sources contributing to the background air quality
would be located further afield and not easy to identify.
In addition, the transport mechanism by which pollutants are
carried over long distances (ranging from 1km up to tens or
hundreds of kms) is rather complex and cannot be adequately
estimated by the 'Gaussian' type of models.
3.
Background Air Quality - Estimation Approach
3.1
The approach
In view
of the difficulties in estimating background air quality using
the air quality models currently available, an alternative
approach based on monitored data is suggested. The essence
of this approach is to adopt the long-term (5-year) averages
of the most recent monitored air quality data obtained by
EPD. These background data would be reviewed yearly or biennially
depending on the availability of the monitored data. The approach
is a first attempt to provide a reasonable estimate of the
background air quality level for use in conjunction with EIA
air quality assessment to address the cumulative impacts upon
a locality. This approach may be replaced or supplemented
by superior modelling efforts such as that entailed in PATH
(Pollutants in the Atmosphere and their Transport over Hong
Kong), a comprehensive territory-wide air quality modelling
system currently being developed for Hong Kong. Notwithstanding
this, the present approach is based on measured data and their
long term regional averages; the background values so derived
should therefore be indicative of the present background air
quality. In the absence of any other meaningful way to estimate
a background air quality for the future, this present background
estimate should also be applied to future projects as a first
attempt at a comprehensive estimate until a better approach
is formulated.
3.2
Categorisation
The monitored
air quality data, by 'district-averaging' are further divided
into three categories, viz, Urban, Industrial and Rural/New
Development. The background pollutant concentrations to be
adopted for a project site would depend on the geographical
constituency to which the site belongs. The categorisation
of these constituencies is given in Section 3.4. The monitoring
stations suggested for the 'district-averaging'(arithmetic
means) to derive averages for the three background air quality
categories are listed as follows:
Urban:
Kwun Tong, Sham Shui Po, Tsim Sha Tsui and Central/Western
Industrial: Kwun Tong, Tsuen Wan and Kwai Chung Rural/New
Development: Sha Tin, Tai Po, Junk Bay, Hong Kong South and
Yuen Long
The averaging
would make use of data from the above stations wherever available.
The majority of the monitoring stations are located some 20m
above ground.
3.3
Background pollutant values
Based
on the above approach, background values for the 3 categories
have been obtained for a few major air pollutants as follows:
| POLLUTANT
|
URBAN
|
INDUSTRIAL |
RURAL/NEW
DEVELOPMENT |
| NO2
|
59 |
57 |
39 |
| SO2
|
21 |
26 |
13 |
| O3
|
62 |
68 |
57 |
| TSP
|
98 |
96 |
87 |
All units
are in micrograms per cubic metre. The above values are derived
from 1992 to 1996 annual averages with the exception of ozone
which represent annual average of daily hourly maximum values
for year 1996.
In cases
where suitable air quality monitoring data representative
of the study site such as those obtained from a nearby monitoring
station or on-site sampling are not available for the prescription
of background air pollution levels, the above tabulated values
can be adopted instead. Strictly speaking, the suggested values
are only appropriate for long term assessment. However, as
an interim measure and until a better approach is formulated,
the same values can also be used for short term assessment.
This implies that the short term background values will be
somewhat under-estimated, which compensates for the fact that
some of the monitoring data are inherently influenced by secondary
sources because of the monitoring station location.
Indeed,
if good quality on-site sampling data which cover at least
one year period are available, these can be used to derive
both the long term (annual) and short term (daily / hourly)
background values, the latter are usually applied on an hour
to hour, day to day basis.
3.4
Site categories
The categories
to which the 19 geographical constituencies belong are listed
as follows:
| DISTRICT
|
AIR
QUALITY CATEGORY |
| Islands
|
Rural/New
Development |
| Southern
|
Rural/New
Development |
| Eastern
|
Urban
|
| Wan
Chai |
Urban
|
| Central
& Western |
Urban
|
| Sai
Kung |
Rural/New
Development |
| Kwun
Tong |
Industrial
|
| Wong
Tai Sin |
Urban
|
| Kowloon
City |
Urban
|
| Yau
Tsim |
Urban
|
| Mong
Kok |
Urban
|
| Sham
Shui Po |
Urban
|
| Kwai
Tsing |
Industrial
|
| Sha
Tin |
Rural/New
Development |
| Tsuen
Wan |
Industrial
|
| Tuen
Mun |
Rural/New
Development |
| Tai
Po |
Rural/New
Development |
| Yuen
Long |
Rural/New
Development |
| Northern
|
Rural/New
Development |
3.5
Provisions for 'double-counting?lt;/b>
The current
approach is, by no means, a rigorous treatment of background
air quality but aims to provide an as-realistic-as-possible
approximation based on limited field data. 'Double-counting'
of 'secondary contributions' may be apparent through the use
of such 'monitoring-based' background data as some of the
monitoring stations are of close proximity to existing emission
sources. 'Primary contributions' due to a proposed project
(which is yet to be realised) will not be double-counted by
such an approach. In order to avoid over-estimation of background
pollutant concentrations, an adjustment to the values given
in section 3.3 is possible and optional by multiplying the
following factor:
(1.0 -
ESecondary contributions/ETerritory)
where
E stands for emission.
The significance
of this factor is to eliminate the fractional contribution
to background pollutant level of emissions due to 'secondary
contributions' out of those from the entire territory. In
most cases, this fractional contribution to background pollutant
levels by the secondary contributions is minimal.
4.
Conclusions
4.1 The
above described approach to estimating the total air quality
impacts of a proposed project, in particular the background
pollutant concentrations for air quality assessment, should
be adopted with immediate effect. Use of short term monitoring
data to prescribe the background concentrations is no longer
acceptable.
Modelling
Section, Air Policy Group
Environmental Protection Department
March 2000
|