CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background........................................................................................................
1.2 Purpose of the Project.......................................................................................
1.3 Objectives and Scope of the Environmental
Assessment.............................
1.4 Approach to the Study.......................................................................................
2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 The Project..........................................................................................................
2.2 Ecological Reserve............................................................................................
2.2.1 Conservation Management Plan..........................................................
2.2.2 Ecological Benefit..................................................................................
2.3 Development Site..............................................................................................
2.3.1 Master Plan of the Development Site..................................................
2.4 Sha Lo Tung Road Improvement......................................................................
2.4.1 Alignment of the Sha Lo Tung Road
Improvement.............................
2.5 Works Programme............................................................................................
3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
3.1 Ecology...............................................................................................................
3.2 Water Quality......................................................................................................
3.2.1 Environment and Water Quality Sensitive
Receivers.........................
3.2.2 Ecological Reserve................................................................................
3.2.3 Development Site..................................................................................
3.2.4 Sha Lo Tung Road Improvement..........................................................
3.3 Air Quality............................................................................................................
3.3.1 Ecological Reserve................................................................................
3.3.2 Development Site..................................................................................
3.3.3 Road Improvement Works....................................................................
3.4 Noise...................................................................................................................
3.5 Waste Management..........................................................................................
3.5.1 Ecological Reserve................................................................................
3.5.2 Development Site..................................................................................
3.5.3 Road Improvement Works....................................................................
3.6 Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment....................................................
3.6.1 Landscape Impacts for the Development Site....................................
3.6.2 Landscape Impacts for the Sha Lo Tung Road
Upgrade Works......
3.6.3 Visual Impacts for the Development site.............................................
3.6.4 Visual Impacts for the Sha Lo Tung Road
Upgrade Works..............
3.7 Sewerage Impact Assessment........................................................................
3.8 Tree Assessment...............................................................................................
3.8.1 Development Site..................................................................................
3.8.2 Road Improvement Works....................................................................
3.9 Environmental Monitoring and Audit................................................................
3.10 Overall Conclusion.............................................................................................
3.10.1 Environmental Outcomes......................................................................
3.10.2 Environmental Benefit............................................................................
LIST OF FIGURES
1
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background
The Pilot Project for
Public-Private Partnership Conservation Scheme, Sha Lo Tung Valley, Tai Po is
proposed to be one of the pilot projects under the Public-Private Partnership
(PPP) scheme. This Project
establishes the framework for a public-private partnership to conserve the Sha
Lo Tung Valley in Tai Po.
Endorsement of the Project will ensure long-term active conservation
management of the ecologically sensitive areas currently located on private
land owned by the Sha Lo Tung Development Company (SLTDC). More importantly, the Project will provide
a source of funds to sustain such conservation action. The Project is fully in line with
Government’s policy intentions for conserving high priority sites such as
Sha Lo Tung, by packaging long term conservation action with sustainable,
compatible commercial activities within the conservation area and suitable
development on adjoining land. With
appropriate development concessions granted in non-sensitive areas (as
identified as the Development Site) adjoining the Conservation Area, the
capital and ongoing costs of establishing and managing conservation operations
and infrastructure in the Valley are assured. This balance between development and
conservation expectations will enable the Valley to become a unique nature
attraction and educational resource for both locals and tourists, which can be
achieved quickly and without Government funding.
1.2
Purpose
of the Project
This Project responds directly
to the former Environment, Transport and Works (ET&W) (now Environment)
Bureau’s invitation to submit proposals for areas selected as potential
“pilot projects” for “Public-Private partnership”
schemes under the Government’s Conservation Policy announced in November
2004. The conservation objectives
espoused in the Project are directed at conservation, ecological enhancement,
sustainable use and education. The
landowner’s commitment to these objectives is achieved through management
and funding obligations provided by development concessions located in
non-sensitive parts of the statutory plan area. With 96% of the private land within the
Valley owned by the SLTDC, the commitment of Green Power and co-operation of
Government, such a partnership can be established immediately to establish
early conservation action within the Valley and ensure its sustainability over
the long term. This Project identifies the steps necessary in such a
partnership, especially the institutional arrangements of the key stakeholders,
namely the landowner (SLTDC), Government and the NGO (Green Power).
The
Project identifies three critical reasons for endorsement of a pilot priority
project within the Sha Lo Tung Valley under the new conservation policy,
namely:-
|
1.
The
Valley Is Accorded High Priority for Nature Conservation and Management
|
In
the announcement of the Conservation Policy on 12 November 2004, the Environment,
Transport & Works Bureau (ETWB) (now Environment Bureau) identified that
the Sha Lo Tung Valley scored 2.7 out of 3.0 on the Bureau’s scoring of
ecologically important sites in Hong Kong.
This places the Valley as No.2 in the ranking of the twelve most
ecologically important sites in Hong Kong. The streamcourse and riparian habitats
have been the subject of many local and international specialist studies and
the ecological significance of the area is reflected in the Outline Zoning Plan
(No. S/NE-SLT/4) which states “the primary planning intention is to
conserve the areas of ecological significance, to preserve the natural
landscape, to promote conservation and to maintain the rural character of the
area”. Sha Lo Tung was also
identified as one of the 12 priority sites for enhanced conservation under the
Conservation Policy. The Project
will protect the habitats through active management to maintain preferable
successional stage and hence suitability as a dragonfly habitat, and prevent
anthropogenic threats such as use of four wheel drive vehicles, wargames and
vegetation removal and undesirable natural succession which are unfavourable to
the existing wildlife.
|
2.
Nature
Conservation Must Be Beneficial to the Biodiversity, Successfully Planned and
Sustainable Alongside Limited Compatible Development
|
The
Project sets out the framework for a new partnership known as the Sha Lo Tung
Conservation Management Board (SCMB) – a tripartite entity formed between
the Government, the SLTDC and Green Power.
Within this framework, long term conservation management is the
responsibility of Green Power, the NGO, who has provided assurance that this
will be carried out in a professional manner and will operate with transparent
and auditable processes. Green
Power has a proven track record of suitable experience through operation of
conservation and education activities at their Guangzhou Green Country
Ecological Education Centre.
|
3.
Institutional
Arrangements and Funding Must Be Realistic and Achievable
|
The
Conservation Policy encourages commitment from the landowner (the SLTDC)
through encouraging compatible development concessions on less ecologically
sensitive land under the “pilot project” that will fund
conservation facilities and operations.
The “Public-Private partnership” between Government, the
SLTDC and Green Power operating in the form of the Sha Lo Tung Conservation
Management Board (SCMB) will oversee start-up operations and administer
on-going funding through a new Conservation Trust Fund. The SLTDC will inject upfront
“seed capital” to construct and equip all conservation,
educational, recreational and public facilities, with such capital repaid from
income generated by the SLTDC’s Multi-Cultural
Education Retreat cum Columbarium development in the green belt zone
adjoining the Conservation Area.
With the Government as an active partner in the “pilot
project”, the Government will facilitate the SLTDC’s submission to
fulfil statutory requirements and procedures.
1.3
Objectives
and Scope of the Environmental Assessment
Although
the Project will preserve Sha Lo Tung Valley, the associated construction works
at the Development Site and Sha Lo Tung Road Improvement have the potential to
cause environmental impacts to the ecologically sensitive Sha Lo Tung Valley if
not controlled properly.
Notwithstanding that the Project is not classified as a Designated
Project (DP) under the Environmental
Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO),
the SLTDC committed to provide information on the nature and extent of
environmental impacts arising from the Project; to recommend appropriate
mitigation measures to control the potential environmental impacts in meeting
the standards and criteria established in the Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process of
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO-TM), and to confirm the environmental acceptability of the
Project.
The
Environmental Assessment (EA) Report addresses the nature and extent of the
identified potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and
operation of a Pilot Project for Public-Private Partnership Conservation
Scheme, Sha Lo Tung Valley, Tai Po, including an Ecological Reserve, Nature
Interpretation Centre, Multi-Cultural
Education Retreat cum Columbarium and Sha Lo Tung Road Improvement
(hereafter referred to as the Project).
The
specific objectives of the EA Study are listed below.
(i)
to describe the Project and
associated works together with the requirements for carrying out the Project;
(ii)
to identify and describe
elements of the community and environment likely to be affected by the Project
and/or likely to cause adverse impacts to the Project, including the natural
and man-made environment and, the associated environmental constraints;
(iii)
to provide information on the
consideration of alternatives to avoid and minimise the potential environmental
impacts to the ecologically sensitive areas and other sensitive uses; to compare
the environmental benefits and dis-benefits of each of the different options;
to provide reasons for selecting the preferred option(s) and to describe the
part that environmental factors played in the selection;
(iv)
to identify and characterise
emission sources and determine the significance of impacts on sensitive
receivers and potentially affected uses;
(v)
to identify and quantify any
potential losses or damage and other potential impacts to flora, fauna and
natural habitats and to propose measures to mitigate these impacts;
(vi)
to identify and quantify any
potential landscape and visual impacts and to propose measures to mitigate
these impacts;
(vii) to propose the provision of mitigation measures so as to minimize
pollution, environmental disturbance and nuisance during construction and
operation stages of the Project;
(viii) to investigate the feasibility, practicability, effectiveness and
implications of the proposed mitigation measures;
(ix)
to identify, predict and
evaluate the residual environmental impacts (i.e. after practicable mitigation)
and the cumulative effects expected to arise during the construction and
operation stages of the Project in relation to the sensitive receivers and
potential affected uses;
(x)
to identify, assess and specify
methods, measures and standards, to be included in the construction and
operation stages of the Project which are necessary to mitigate these
environmental impacts and cumulative effects and reduce them to acceptable
levels;
(xi)
to investigate the extent of
the secondary environmental impacts that may arise from the proposed mitigation
measures and to identify constraints associated with the mitigation measures
recommended in the EA study, as well as the provision of any necessary
modification; and
(xii) to design and specify environmental monitoring and audit
requirements to ensure the effective implementation of the recommended
environmental protection and pollution control measures.
As specified above, the EA Study addressed the
following key environmental issues due to the construction and operation of the
Project:
·
potential aquatic and
terrestrial ecological impacts during construction and operation stages of
Project development, including the loss of habitats, removal of vegetation and
disturbance to wildlife, in particular the Sha Lo Tung SSSI, Pat Sin Leng
Country Park and any other sensitive areas that have been identified during the
course of the EA study;
·
potential water quality impacts
during construction and operation stages of Project development, in particular
to the Sha Lo Tung SSSI and streams;
·
potential air quality impacts
(including the dust, gaseous emission and odour impacts along the Sha Lo Tung Roads
due to traffic generated from the Project) to the identified Air Sensitive
Receivers (ASRs) during construction and operation stages of Project
development;
·
potential noise impacts
(including the traffic noise impact along the Sha Lo Tung Roads with traffic
generated from the Project) to the identified Noise Sensitive Receivers (NSRs)
during construction and operation stages of Project development;
·
potential environmental impacts
associated with the handling and disposal of wastes during construction and
operation stages of Project development, in particular the disposal of surplus
excavated materials arising from site formation works;
·
potential landscape and visual
impacts due to the Project during construction and operation stages of Project
development, in particular the potential impact to the landscape value and
recreational interests of the Pat Sin Leng Country Park; and
·
potential sewerage impacts due
to the proposed Project development.
1.4
Approach
to the Study
The EA Study was conducted in
accordance with the guideline on assessment methodologies provided in the Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact
Assessment Process (EIAO-TM). The general approach for the assessment
included:
· Description
of the baseline environmental conditions for the impact assessment;
· Identification
of potential impacts;
· Evaluation
of potential impacts; and
· Recommendation
of mitigation measures and environmental and monitoring programme.
The assessments in this EA Study are
conducted using well-proven and internationally accepted methods based on the
worst-case conditions associated with the construction and operation of the
Project.
2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1
The
Project
The Project includes three components:
Ecological Reserve, Development Site and Sha Lo Tung Road Improvement (Figure 1). Sha Lo Tung Development Company (SLTDC)
and Green Power (GP) propose to set up an Ecological Reserve (approximately 52
ha, accounting for more than 90% of the entire Valley) in Sha Lo Tung (SLT)
Valley, through surrendering private housing lots (approximately 0.8 ha) and
private agricultural lots (approximately 26 ha) in the Valley and agricultural
lots in the adjacent Country Park (approximately 2 ha) to Government. The proposed Development Site and Sha Lo Tung Road Improvement are
outside of the Country
Park and Conservation Area.
The Ecological Reserve will maintain, protect, restore and enhance the
ecological resources of the SLT
Valley. This will be achieved by preventing
unauthorised incompatible activities, managing and restoring habitats at the
“best” succession state, and by enhancing grassland and woodland
habitat. An additional benefit will
be the provision of nature education activities which will promote awareness,
appreciation and understanding of the ecological value of the area. The scheme is enabled by allowing the
development of a Nature Interpretation Centre, and a Multi-Cultural Education
Retreat cum Columbarium (with a footprint of approximately 1.5 ha) within the
Development Site (of approximately 5.5 ha, which comprises less than 10% of the
SLT Valley area) in a lower ecological value
area at the entrance to the Valley.
The initial set up and long term operation funding of the Ecological
Reserve will come primarily from the sale of niches in the Columbarium. The existing Sha Lo Tung Road (approximately 2.3 km)
will .be upgraded to Single Track standard with minimum number of passing bays
to meet the requirements of the Buildings Department and Fire Services
Department at SLTDC’s own cost.
2.2
Ecological
Reserve
The Ecological Reserve, of approximately 52 ha, provides an opportunity
to enhance Sha Lo Tung Valley’s environment for the benefit of the
community and boost its ecological value.
Biodiversity conservation is the core focus of the Public Private
Partnership (PPP) programme where value-added activities such as conservation
education, and preservation of cultural heritage will be integrated into the
management strategy of Sha Lo Tung Valley, when appropriate. It can be achieved by adopting a
Conservation Management Plan (CMP), which prescribes management to safeguard
the ecological value of the area in perpetuity for the people of Hong Kong. A
summary of the CMP is presented in the following sections.
2.2.1
Conservation
Management Plan
The
CMP will serve as a guideline for action covering the first 5-year period and
will evolve as time passes and experience is gained. The key objectives are:
·
Objective 1: Conserve and Enhance Dragonfly
Biodiversity
·
Objective 2: Enhance Upland
Habitats by Removal of Exotic Vegetation
·
Objective 3: Enhance Quality and Area of Secondary Woodland Habitat
·
Objective 4: Restore and Rehabilitate Abandoned
Farmlands
·
Objective 5: Sustainably Manage Visitors
·
Objective 6: Conserve Target Species
·
Objective 7: Enhance Conservation Education
Opportunities
The
plan will be implemented by a Sha Lo Tung Conservation Management Board (SCMB)
which will include three major stakeholders, including the Project Proponent
(SLTDC), the management contractor (Green Power) and the HKSAR Government,
which may include representatives from other green groups and academic
representatives.
2.2.2 Ecological
Benefit
The Development
Site is located in area of less ecological concern (mainly shrubland grassland
mosaic) and avoids all of the ecologically sensitive areas, including Country Park, SSSIs and Sha Lo Tung
streams. Further to the detailed
assessment presented in the EA Study, no unacceptable ecological impacts during
the construction and operational phases of the proposed development at
Development Site and Sha Lo Tung
Road are predicted..
With
the implementation of the Conservation Management Plan, human disturbance will
be largely reduced/ controlled.
Disturbance due to hillfire, visitors and vandalism would be controlled
by pro-active management, including patrolling and conservation education. Under the Sha Lo Tung pilot project, an
aggressive fire-suppression programme will be implemented to prevent the
occurrence of hill fires (regularly recorded within Sha Lo Tung Valley). Rubbish and illegal traps would also be
constantly removed by site managers.
As a consequence, the proposed development will expect to obtain
ecological gain.
The
PPP pilot scheme will not only avoid and minimise ecological impacts but will
enhance the conservation value of Sha Lo Tung Valley through the following
actions:
·
It removes large scale village
expansion as a threat to the ecological integrity and conservation value of the
valley; and,
·
It protects the area by
controlling site access and enhances the ecological values by active
management.
2.3
Development
Site
2.3.1
Master
Plan of the Development Site
Due to
the sensitivity of the Sha Lo Tung Valley and the potential construction
impacts to the Sha Lo Tung Stream, the design of the Master Plan of the
Development Site has adopted the following considerations, in order to avoid
potential impacts to the existing trees and Sha Lo Tung Stream.
·
Provision of a minimum
Additional 20 m wide Non-Building Buffer from the Sha Lo Tung SSSI
·
Maximising the Utilisation of
the Existing Profile and Natural Topography
·
Locating Facilities away from the
Sha Lo Tung SSSI and Stream
·
Preservation of Existing Trees
With
the adoption of the above considerations, the Master Plan as presented in Figure 2 can avoid or minimise potential
water quality and ecological impacts to the stream and SSSI, as well as impacts
to woodland and trees.
The
preliminary Master Plan and the concept of the Nature Interpretation Centre,
and a Multi-Cultural Education Retreat cum Columbarium is presented in Figure 2. The proposed development comprises the
following:
·
Nature Interpretation Centre;
·
Large open landscaping areas;
·
Open car park;
·
Path;
·
Multi-Cultural Education Retreat;
·
Confucius Halls
·
Security/ Staff Quarters, and
·
Columbarium to accommodate maximum 60,000
niches.
2.4
Sha
Lo Tung
Road Improvement
2.4.1
Alignment
of the Sha Lo Tung
Road Improvement
The
existing Sha Lo Tung Road
between Ting Kok Road
and Sha Lo Tung Valley (approximately 2.3 km) is the only vehicular access to
Sha Lo Tung Valley and the Development Site. The reason for the proposed improvements
is to upgrade the existing roadway to the minimum requirement of a safe Single
Track Access Road that would also enable emergency access for fire
engines. In the absence of the road
improvements, delivery of emergency services would not be practicable. In order to meet the traffic demand
during construction and facilitate the transportation of construction plants or
raw materials to/from the Development Site, it is proposed to complete the road
improvement works with drainage and sewerage systems prior to commencement of
site formation works.
The
principles of the design for the road improvement works are: -
·
Minimize disturbance to the existing landscape
and trees;
·
Preserve woodlands of ecological value;
·
Provide a safe access road; and
·
Enable emergency vehicle access to the
Ecological Reserve, Nature Interpretation Centre, Multi-Cultural Education
Retreat cum Columbarium.
Following
the principles of the improvement works, the impacts arising from the upgrading
of Sha Lo Tung Road
will be kept to a minimum, and the improved road will be able to provide
emergency service access, serve the conservation facilities, Pat Sin Leng Country
Park and Water Services
Department (WSD) Service Reservoirs etc.
In light of the low volume of traffic forecast, the access road shall
remain a single track access road with basic improvements to satisfy the
Transport and Planning Design Manual (TPDM) requirements. These include:
·
Widening the existing access road to a minimum
width of 4.5 m, which according to TPDM is suitable for use of emergency
vehicles;
·
Providing additional inter-visible passing
places at maximum spacing 60 m for 2-way traffic;
·
Appropriate local widening at bends of up to 6 m
wide to cater for travel of emergency vehicles from Ting Kok Road to the proposed
conservation facilities;
·
The access road shall follow the existing road
alignment and profile to minimise earthworks and impacts to the existing
environment. Nevertheless, the road
shall be re-profiled to ensure a maximum gradient less than 16% because a
gradient more than 16% is not suitable for use of emergency vehicles;
·
The road will be widened towards the eastern
side through cutting the uphill slopes to avoid disturbing the woodland
dominating on the western side;
·
The soil nailing, if required to stabilise
slopes particularly downhill, can be implemented carefully to avoid damage to
trees and the slope surface can be planted to maintain a green landscape after
the improvement works are finished;
·
Provision of a vehicle turn round facility at
the entrance of Sha Lo Tung Valley suitable for the use of fire engines;
·
Provision of drainage system with additional
verges and sewer along the route;
·
No encroachment to Conservation Area and Pat Sin Leng Country
Park; and
·
Appropriate landscape design along the access
road.
2.5
Works
Programme
The
works programme and the work sequence of the Project will be undertaken as
follows:
·
Ecological
Reserve – The enhancement work will be undertaken immediately
once the commencement of the Project is confirmed in order to provide the
greatest conservation and ecological benefit.
·
Sha Lo Tung Road Improvement – The
road improvement works will be divided into three phases. Each phase of the road works will be
constructed in sequence with each will take approximately 6 to 7 months.
·
Development
Site – The site formation works will be carried out in
three stages after Sha Lo Tung Road Improvement: Stage 1 (approximately 7
months), Stage 2 (approximately 6 months) and Stage 3 (approximately 6
months). The duration of each of
the three stages will overlap at certain periods of time so that the earthworks
(soil and excavation and filling works) will only be undertaken during the dry
season (November to March).
3
ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS
The
environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of the
Project are summarised in the following sections.
3.1
Ecology
The ecological impact assessment has been prepared using
the results of comprehensive literature reviews and ecological field update
surveys conducted between 2004 and 2008.
The Ecological Reserve covers areas within Sha Lo Tung Valley and is
considered of high ecological significance. Habitats recorded include Fung Shui
Woods, secondary woodlands, grassland shrubland mosaic, streams, abandoned
agricultural land and developed area (abandoned village). However, the habitat quality within Sha
Lo Tung Valley is degrading due to threats such as the use of four wheel drive
vehicles, hill fires, wargames and vegetation removal.
The
Development Site is mainly covered by grassland-shrubland mosaic with a small
part of the area occupied by secondary woodland (of moderate to high ecological
value). The grassland-shrubland
mosaic is frequently disturbed by hill fire and is considered to have low
ecological value. The secondary
woodland is dominated by climax native tree species such as Schima superba with densely vegetated
understorey and is considered of moderate to high ecological value. Species of conservation interest
recorded within the Development Site included Greater Coucal, Hwamei and
Crested Serpent Eagle.
Habitats
within the Sha Lo Tung Road Improvement area include secondary woodland,
plantation, grassland-shrubland mosaic, abandoned agricultural land, and
developed area. Aside from the
secondary woodland of moderate to high ecological value, all of the remaining
habitats are of low ecological value.
Species of conservation interest recorded within the Construction Works
Boundary along the Sha Lo Tung Road Improvement included Incense Tree Aquilaria sinensis, Lamb of Tartary Cibotium barometz, Pavetta Pavetta Hongkongensis
Rhodoleia Rhodoleia championii,
Common Tutcheria Tutcheria spectabilis
and Willow-leaved Camellia Camellia
salicifolia, bird species Crested Serpent Eagle, Greater Coucal, Lesser
Coucal and HwameI.
The
enhancement works for the establishment of the Ecological Reserve and the
implementation of the Conservation Management Plan will enhance the
conservation value of Sha Lo Tung Valley.
In addition, human disturbance such as hill fire will be largely
reduced/ controlled. As a
consequence, the proposed Project is expected to bring about long term and
sustainable benefits to the ecology of Sha Lo Tung Valley and the habitats and
associated wildlife.
Direct
habitat loss may result from the land taken for the construction of proposed
buildings and facilities as well as the Sha Lo Tung Road improvement works. The majority of the proposed development
will be constructed on the grassland-shrubland mosaic and thereby reduce the
impacts on the secondary woodland.
With the provision of a 20 m building buffer
from Sha Lo Tung SSSI, the riparian woodlands which served as wildlife
(particularly Family Gomphidae dragonflies) foraging/ roosting grounds are
significantly preserved. The
small-sized habitat loss due to the proposed development is not predicted to
cause adverse impacts to the wildlife using the SLT SSSI and associated
habitats. The ecological impacts on
the larval stage of the dragonfly community in the SSSI due to the water
quality impacts from the construction activities are likely to be avoided
through water pollution control measures.
No unacceptable
ecological impacts during the construction and operational phases are expected
based on the current design given that appropriate mitigation measures are
properly implemented, including:
·
completion
of the Sha Lo Tung Road
improvement (with well designed drainage systems) before any construction works
for the Development Site;
·
scheduling the earth works in the dry season;
·
provision of
an additional 20 m non-building buffer between the works area and Sha Lo Tung
SSSI;
·
adoption of
a phased schedule;
·
compensatory planting;
·
good construction practice;
·
a well
designed temporary drainage system;
·
erection of site hoarding in advance of the
commencement of any works;
·
proper
visitor control (particularly during special festivals); and,
·
restricting the workers within the Development Site
during construction.
No adverse residual water quality or associated
ecological impacts were predicted to occur due to construction of the Project
on the basis that the recommended mitigation measures are adopted in full.
3.2
Water
Quality
3.2.1
Environment
and Water Quality Sensitive Receivers
Sha Lo Tung Valley comprises water quality sensitive
receivers including Sha Lo Tung SSSI and stream, which are also considered of
high ecological and conservation significance. It has been identified that the water
quality sensitive receivers (WSRs) of the Development Site and Sha Lo Tung Road
Improvement include Sha Lo Tung SSSI, Fung Yuen Valley SSSI and streams.
3.2.2
Ecological
Reserve
The enhancement
works will include installation of a drop bar at the road entrance to Sha Lo
Tung Valley, weed removal, enhancement planting, marsh restoration, plantation,
trail enhancement, provision of alternative country park access and enhancing
the existing damaged footpath alongside the natural streams. These works will be carried out with
hand tools only. No major
excavation works will be required and no water quality impact is anticipated.
Only minor works will be required during emergencies
or routine maintenance. No
wastewater generating activity will occur and no water quality impact is
expected during the operational phase.
3.2.3
Development
Site
During the
construction phase of the Project water quality impacts have the potential to arise
from construction runoff, general construction activities and domestic sewage
discharge. To avoid ecological risk
to the downstream Sha Lo Tung Valley, any discharge of construction runoff from
the Development Site is prohibited.
The following practices and measures to be proposed are targeted to
ensure no discharge of construction runoff to the downstream ecological
sensitive areas and Sha Lo Tung Stream:
·
Complete the Sha
Lo Tung Road improvement (with well designed
drainage and sewerage systems) before any construction works are undertaken
within the Development Site;
·
Restrict earthworks to the dry season;
·
Manage the construction sequences, in particular during the
wet season;
·
Provide temporary drainage channels with sedimentation tanks
to divert the site runoff to the sandtrap before discharging it from the site;
·
Provide silt removal facilities such as sedimentation tanks
and sand traps;
·
Provide a separate temporary drainage system to divert the natural
runoff away from the site and minimise the site runoff;
·
Erect a continuous site hoarding with seal along the
northern boundary of the Development Site; and
·
Carry out daily inspection.
It is
anticipated that if effective controls, including but not limited to the
construction of peripheral channels and erection of the site hoarding (with any
gaps to be filled and cemented) in advance of site formation works and
earthworks which are only to be undertaken during the dry season, are applied,
the potential water quality impacts are expected to be minimal.
During the
operational phase, the identified water quality impacts will be surface runoff
from the paved road and platform (ie car park), and the disposal of domestic
sewage. With the installation of grit
and oil interceptor for paved areas, and no discharge of sewage to WSRs, no
adverse impacts to the WSRs are anticipated.
3.2.4
Sha
Lo Tung
Road Improvement
During the
construction phase of the Sha Lo Tung Road Improvement, the water quality impacts
have the potential to arise mainly from construction runoff and general
construction activities. It is
anticipated that the effects on water quality from the construction activities
are likely to be minimal, provided that major earthworks are undertaken during
dry season, and that good construction practices and well designed temporary
drainage system are implemented.
Vehicles will
enter the Ecological Reserve, Nature Interpretation Centre, and a
Multi-Cultural Education Retreat cum Columbarium along the improved Sha Lo Tung Road to
the car park which will be situated at the western side of the Development
Site. The road runoff may contain
minimal amounts of oil, grease and grit that may cause water quality impacts to
the watercourses, if uncontrolled.
With the installation of grit and oil interceptors for the road, no
adverse impacts to the WSRs are anticipated. Furthermore, it is anticipated that the
number of vehicles entering the area will be relatively low when compared to
the main roads and this will further minimise water quality impacts.
3.3
Air
Quality
3.3.1 Ecological Reserve
The enhancement works will include the installation of a
drop bar at the road entrance to Sha Lo Tung Valley, weed removal, enhancement planting,
marsh restoration, plantation, trail enhancement, provision of signage and
enhancing the existing damaged footpaths alongside the natural streams. These works will be carried out with
hand tools only. No major
excavation works will be required and no dust impact is anticipated.
Only minor works will be required during emergencies or
routine maintenance. No air
pollution generating activity is required and no air quality impact is expected
during the operational phase.
3.3.2 Development Site
The construction works at the Development Site will be
carried out in three stages. Dust
nuisance from construction works and gaseous emissions from diesel-powered
equipment are the potential air quality concerns during the construction of the
Multi-Cultural Education Retreat cum Columbarium. Dust may be generated from materials
handling, excavation and filling, wind erosion and truck movements during site
formation works. The scale of the
construction works is likely to be small and the rate of excavated soil generation
will also be low (ie 52 m3/day on average). With the implementation of recommended
dust control measures and good site practices, dust impact is not
expected. The number of
diesel-powered construction equipment to be operated at any one time will be
limited owing to the small scale of the works and the diversion of the works
into phases. Gaseous emissions from
the operation of diesel-powered equipment are expected to be minor and no
adverse air quality impact is anticipated.
The number of visitor during public holidays and festival
holidays will be increased.
However, burning of effigies and paper offerings will not be allowed at
the future development; therefore no adverse air quality impact is anticipated
during the operation of the development.
In-house management measures such as signage to remind visitors on the
prohibition on burning effigy should be provided.
Vehicular emissions from Sha Lo Tung Road are the key air quality
concern during the operation of the columbarium. In view of the large separation
distances between ASRs and the future columbarium and compliance with HKPSG
recommendations, no adverse air quality impact is anticipated.
3.3.3 Road Improvement Works
Dust nuisance from construction works and gaseous emissions from
diesel-powered equipment are the potential concerns during the road improvement
works. Materials handling, wind
erosion and truck movements are expected to be the major sources of
construction dust. The road
improvement works will be conducted over a period of 14 months and the works
will be carried out in phases, each of which covers only a road section of
approximately 800m in length, and therefore the works area will be small. In view of the large separation
distances between ASRs and the works area, no adverse dust impact is
anticipated. The number of
diesel-powered equipment to be used for the works will be limited owing to the
small size of the works area. The
air emissions from diesel equipment are expected to be minor and no adverse air
quality impact is expected. With
the implementation of the recommended dust control measures and good site
practices, the dust impact is expected to comply with the dust criteria.
Vehicular emissions are envisaged to be the only air quality
concern during the operation of the widened Sha Lo Tung Road. In view of the large separation
distances between ASRs and the widened road and compliance with HKPSG
recommendation, no adverse vehicular emission impact is anticipated.
3.4
Noise
With the identified NSRs located more than 780 m from the
Development Site and Ecological Reserve, together with the implementation of
construction mitigation measures, it is anticipated that noise from the
construction and operational activities to be carried out at the Development
Site and Ecological Reserve will not adversely affect the NSRs.
A construction assessment was carried out to assess the
potential noise impact from the road improvement works. The assessment results indicate that the
predicted construction noise levels at the NSRs comply with the daytime
construction noise limit of 75 dB(A).
During the operational phase of the Project, the induced traffic on Sha Lo Tung Road
will not cause any adverse noise impact to the NSRs. Noise monitoring is not required during
either construction phase or operational phase. A detailed noise impact assessment
should be undertaken during the detailed design of the fixed plant items for
the development.
3.5
Waste
Management
3.5.1 Ecological Reserve
The enhancement works will include installation of a drop
bar at the road entrance to Sha Lo Tung Valley, weed removal, enhancement
planting, marsh restoration, plantation, trail enhancement, provision of
signage and enhancing the existing damaged footpath alongside the natural
streams. No excavation works
will be required. Green waste will
be generated and with the implementation of good waste management and on-site
waste minimisation practices, no adverse impact associated with the management
of green waste is expected.
Limited green waste will be generated during the maintenance
and operation of the ecological reserve.
With the implementation of good waste management, no adverse impact
associated with the management of green waste is expected.
3.5.2 Development Site
Approximately 7,500 m3 of inert soft materials
will be excavated during site formation and approximately 7,000 m3
of public fill are required for filling to the required level. The in-situ excavated materials will be reused
for the backfilling, and the cutting and filling activities for the site
formation and slope works will be planned and arranged in such a way that the
requirement for stockpiling will be minimised. The waste management assessment is based
on the worst case scenario assuming there is no reuse of materials
on-site. The average rate of
excavated soil generation and filling rate will be low (ie 52 m3/day
and 49 m3/day, respectively).
About 17 trucks and 8 trucks will be required per day on average to dispose
to public filling facilities and to import fill materials, respectively. About 1,500 m3 of
construction waste will be generated from new building construction. Given the implementation of recommended
mitigation measures (ie waste management programme) and good site practices, no
adverse environmental impact is expected during the construction phase.
Limited quantities of general refuse and chemical wastes are
expected during the operation of the Nature Interpretation Centre,
Multi-Cultural Education Retreat cum Columbarium. With good site practices, the potential
environmental impacts associated with the storage, handling, collection,
transport and disposal of a small quantity of general refuse and chemical
wastes arising from the operation of the Multi-Cultural Education Retreat will
meet the relevant EIAO-TM criteria
and no adverse impact associated with waste management is anticipated.
3.5.3 Road Improvement Works
The road improvement works will be divided into three
phases. The three phases of the road
improvement works will be undertaken in consecutive sequence with some overlap
between phases. A total of 11,000 m3
of soil will be excavated over the14-month construction period. About 25m3 of soil is
estimated to be generated per day.
Even if a peak factor of 2 is applied to cater for the potential
increase in spoil generation during the overlapping of two phases, the
estimated peak volume of spoil to be generated per day (ie 50 m3) is
still considered small. Assuming a
capacity of 7.5 m3 per truck and a bulk factor of 1.2, about 8
trucks per day will be required to dispose to public filling facilities. A small volume of fill materials (ie,
1,000 m3) will be required.
Assuming 24 working days a month, a capacity of 7.5 m3 per
truck and a bulk factor of 1.2, the filling rate, on average, will be 3 m3
per day and about 1 truck will be required to import the fill materials. With such a small number of truck trips
generated, the effect on the existing traffic on Sha Lo Tung Road would be minimal.
Chemical waste generated from maintenance of construction
equipment will be generated during the construction phase. Given the implementation of the
recommended mitigation measures, no adverse environmental impact is expected
during the construction phase.
3.6
Landscape
and Visual Impact Assessment
3.6.1 Landscape Impacts for the Development Site
Landscape Character and
Resources
The Landscape Resources and Character Areas of the
Development Site comprise:
·
LR 1 Secondary Woodland;
·
LR 2 Grassland Shrubland Mosaic;
·
LR 3 Abandoned Agricultural Land;
·
LR 4 Natural Stream;
·
LR 5 Developed Area, and;
·
LCA1 Upland and Hillside Landscape.
There
will be Negligible impacts on the Abandoned Agricultural Land
and the Stream. Following the construction of new streams, there will be a Slight Beneficial impact on this LR.
Secondary
Woodland will
experience Moderate Adverse
un-mitigated impacts during construction and operation. Following mitigation,
these will reduce to Slight and Neither Beneficial nor Adverse at year
10 of operation.
Grassland
Shrubland Mosaic will experience Slight-Moderate
Adverse un-mitigated impacts during construction and operation. Following mitigation, these will reduce
to Negligible at year 10.
The
Developed Areas will experience Slight
Neither Beneficial nor Adverse un-mitigated impacts during construction and
operation. Following mitigation, these will reduce to Slight Beneficial at year 10 of operation.
The Upland and Hillside
Landscape Character Area will experience Moderate
Adverse un-mitigated impacts during construction and operation reducing to Slight Adverse during year 10 of
operation year 10 of operation.
The
loss of the 41 trees will be compensated on-site by planting native heavy
standard size tree at a ratio of 5:1.
The newly planted trees will be maintained by the Contractor for 12
months after planting and any dead trees found during the maintenance period
will be replaced by healthy plants of the same species and same size.
3.6.2 Landscape Impacts for the Sha Lo Tung Road
Upgrade Works
The
Landscape Resources and Character Areas of the Sha Lo Tung Road Upgrade Works
comprise:
·
LR 1 Secondary Woodland
·
LR 2 Grassland Shrubland Mosaic;
·
LR 3 Abandoned Agricultural Land;
·
LR 4 Plantation
·
LR 5 Developed Area, and;
·
LCA1 Upland and Hillside Landscape.
Secondary Woodland
will experience Moderate Adverse un-mitigated
impacts during construction and operation.
Following mitigation, these will reduce to Slight Adverse at year 10.
Grassland Shrubland Mosaic, Abandoned
Agricultural Land,
and Plantation
will experience Slight-Moderate Adverse un-mitigated impacts
during construction and operation. Following mitigation, these will reduce to Negligible at year 10.
The Developed Areas will experience Slight Neither Beneficial nor Adverse un-mitigated impacts during
construction and operation. Following mitigation, these will reduce to Negligible at year 10.
The Upland and Hillside
Landscape Character Area will experience Moderate
Adverse un-mitigated impacts during construction and operation reducing to Slight Adverse following mitigation.
327
trees are considered to be conflict with the development within the Road
Upgrade works area. The loss of the
327 trees will be compensated on-site by planting native trees at a ratio of
3:1.
3.6.3 Visual Impacts for the Development site
The
three VSR’s were identified as:
·
VSR 1 Cloudy Peak;
·
VSR 2 Wilson
Trail; and,
·
VSR 3 Residents of the Tai Po residential estate.
VSR1
Cloudy Peak will experience Moderate
Adverse un-mitigated and mitigated construction impacts. The un-mitigated
operation impacts will be Moderate
Adverse, reducing to Slight Adverse
following mitigation at year 10.
VSR2
Wilson Trail will experience Slight Adverse
un-mitigated and mitigated construction impacts. The un-mitigated operation
impacts will also be Slight Adverse.
Mitigation measures will reduce these impacts, however they will remain Slight Adverse at year 10 of operation.
VSR3
Tai Po estate will experience Slight-Adverse
un-mitigated and mitigated construction impacts. The mitigated operation
impacts will also be Slight Adverse
reducing to Negligible following
mitigation at year 10.
Mitigation
Measures. There is to be a high level of landscape treatment associated with
this proposed development which will not only mitigate any potential landscape
or visual impacts, but will vastly improve the proposed Development Site from
the existing condition.
The
development will be visible at night, however due to the long distances to the
VSRs, the light impact will be very low intensity and is considered acceptable.
The
Landscape and Visual Impacts associated with the development site are
considered acceptable with mitigation.
3.6.4 Visual Impacts for the Sha Lo Tung Road
Upgrade Works
The three
VSR’s were identified as:
·
VSR 1 Cloudy Peak;
·
VSR 2 Wilson
Trail; and,
·
VSR 3 Residents of the Tai Po residential estate.
VSR1 Cloudy Peak
will experience Slight-Moderate Adverse
un-mitigated construction and operation impacts. The un-mitigated operation
impacts are also assessed as Slight-Moderate
Adverse reducing to Slight Adverse
following mitigation at year 10.
VSR2 Wilson
Trail will experience Negligible
impacts during both construction and operation.
VSR3 Tai Po
estate will experience Slight-Moderate
Adverse un-mitigated construction and operation impacts. The un-mitigated
operation impacts are also assessed as Slight-Moderate
Adverse reducing to Slight Adverse
following mitigation at year 10.
A number of
mitigation measures are proposed to reduce the landscape and visual impacts of
the road improvement works and improve the overall amenity of the upgraded
road. These include cut-slope finishing, retention of trees and compatible
colouring of site hoardings.
The Landscape
and Visual Impacts associated with the development site are considered
acceptable with mitigation.
3.7
Sewerage
Impact Assessment
Taking into consideration the constraints
of the Development Site, and the existing and planned sewage network in the
region, three sewage disposal options for the development of the Site have been
investigated. In broad terms, the
three proposed sewage disposal options are discharging to Tai Po Sewage
Treatment Works, treatment on Site and removal off site.
Among the three options, the
option of discharging the sewage to Tai Po Sewage Treatment Works is
recommended. The option of
provision of on-site sewage treatment plant and removal of the sewage off site
by tanker are not recommended. The
recommended option is considered feasible and practical given that the impacts
to the downstream sewer and the Tai Po Sewage Treatment Works are considered
insignificant. The details of the
recommended sewage disposal scheme will be further confirmed at the detailed
design stage and close liaison will be carried out with relevant departments to
approve the scheme.
An assessment of the impacts of
sewage generation during festival days has also been considered. With the following measures to
manage the increase in sewage generation, no adverse impacts to the sewerage
system are expected:
·
Provision
of adequate permanent water closets and urinals in the complex;
·
Emptying
of the sewage storage tank before and immediately after the festivals; and
·
Provision
of portable toilets for contingency purpose.
3.8
Tree
Assessment
3.8.1 Development Site
A Tree survey has been conducted to record the abundance,
species name, location, trunk diameters and circumference, height, crown
spread, tree form, health condition and amenity value of the trees found within
the Development Site. A total of
505 individual trees were found, most of which are native secondary woodland plants
dominated by a few native tree species including Schima superba, Schefflera heptaphylla, Castanopsis fissa and Ilex ficoidea. Most of the trees have reached maturity
but due to overcrowding they were recorded in poor to fair tree form with low
to medium amenity value. 41 of them
were recommended to be felled, 463 of them were proposed to be retained on site
and one of them is recommended to be transplanted. The felled trees will be compensated by
planting heavy standard size tree at 5: 1 ratio. The newly planted trees will be
maintained by the Contractor for 12 months after planting.
3.8.2 Road Improvement Works
A Tree survey has been conducted to record the abundance,
species name, location, trunk diameters and circumference, height, crown spread,
tree form, health condition and amenity value of the trees found along the Sha
Lo Tung Road. A total of 672
individual trees were found, most of which are native secondary woodland plants
and dominated by a few native tree species including Schima superba, Schefflera heptaphylla and Cinnamomum camphora.
Most of the trees have reached maturity but due to overcrowding they
were recorded in poor to fair tree form with low to medium amenity value. 327 of them may require to be felled,
341 of them were proposed to be retained on site, and four of them will be
transplanted to a non-impacted area.
The felled trees will be compensated by planting heavy standard size
tree at a 3:1 ratio. The
compensatory planting will be conducted on-site, either at the new cut slope
along the road or within the Development Site or the Ecological Reserve. The
newly planted trees will be maintained by the Contractor for 12 months after
planting.
3.9
Environmental
Monitoring and Audit
Ecological, stream and water
quality monitoring and construction site audits will be carried out during the
construction phase to check for compliance with the relevant criteria. Water quality monitoring will be
undertaken during the first twelve months of the operation phase.
3.10
Overall
Conclusion
3.10.1 Environmental Outcomes
The
environmental assessment (covering ecology, water quality, air quality, noise,
waste management, landscape and visual, and sewerage) has concluded that no
unacceptable residual environmental impacts are envisaged due to the
construction and operation of the Project.
3.10.2 Environmental Benefit
With Project
Scenario
An
Ecological Reserve (approximately 52 ha) in Sha Lo Tung Valley will be set up
by the Sha Lo Tung Development Company (SLTDC) and Green Power (GP), through
surrendering of private housing lots (approximately 0.8 ha) and private
agricultural lots (approximately 26 ha) in the Valley and agricultural lots in
the adjacent Country Park (approximately 2 ha) to the government. The Ecological Reserve is anticipated to
enhance to the ecology of the Sha Lo Tung Valley, including protection against
unauthorized and incompatible activities, management/ restoration of habitats
to avoid degradation due to natural succession, to enhancement to grassland/
woodland for habitat improvement, and provision of nature education to promote
awareness, appreciation, understanding and supporting action among the
public. The scheme is enabled by
allowing the development of a Nature Interpretation Centre, and a
Multi-Cultural Education Retreat cum Columbarium (the Development Site, of
approximately 5.5 ha) in a lower ecological value area at the entrance to the
Valley. The initial set up and long
term operation funding of the Ecological Reserve primarily comes from the sale
of niches in the Columbarium. The
existing Sha Lo Tung Road
(approximately 2.3 km) will be upgraded to Single Track standard at
SLTDC’s own cost.
The
Pilot Project for Public-Private Conservation Scheme, Sha Lo Tung Valley, Tai
Po is proposed to be one of the pilot projects under the scheme of
Public-Private Partnership (PPP).
This proposal establishes the framework for a public-private partnership
to conserve the Sha Lo Tung Valley.
Under the current proposal, Sha Lo Tung Valley will be ensured of
long-term active conservation management in which the ecologically sensitive
areas currently located on private land owned by the SLTDC will be
protected.
The
Development Site is located in areas of less ecological concern (mainly
shrubland grassland mosaic) and avoids all of the ecological sensitive areas,
including Country
Park, SSSIs and Sha Lo
Tung streams. Further to the
detailed assessment presented in the above sections, ecological impacts due to
the proposed development at Development Site and the widening works of Sha Lo Tung Road,
no unacceptable ecological impacts are expected during the construction and
operational phases.
With
the implementation of the Conservation Management Plan, human disturbance of
the Ecological Reserve will be largely reduced/ controlled. Disturbance due to hill fire, visitors
and vandalism would be controlled by pro-active management, including
patrolling and conservation education.
Under the Sha Lo Tung pilot project, an aggressive fire-suppression
programme will be implemented to prevent the occurrence of hill fires (recently
recorded within Sha Lo Tung Valley).
Rubbish and illegal traps would also be constantly removed by site
managers. As a consequence, the
proposed development is expected to bring about long term ecological benefits
to Sha Lo Tung Valley.
The
PPP pilot scheme will not only avoid and minimise ecological impacts but will
enhance the conservation value of Sha Lo Tung Valley through the following
actions:
·
It
removes large scale village expansion as a threat to the ecological integrity
and conservation value of the valley; and,
·
It
protects the area by controlling site access and enhances the ecological values
by active management.
Without Project
Scenario
The
remnants of three village settlements, Cheung Uk, Lei Uk and Lo Wai, which were
settled over 500 years ago, now lie abandoned surrounded by mature woodland and
abandoned agricultural fields. A
recognised village burial ground exists on the eastern knoll at the entrance of
the Valley. While the villagers have left, their traditional rights to New
Territories Exempt Housing (NTEH) in the Sha Lo Tung Valley, are still
valid. In 1996, the District
Officer/Tai Po advised that these rights would require some 160 NTEH
sites. On top of these, the
villages include building lots totaling some 9849.4 sq m of land, which allows
development of housing as of right up to some 29,000 sq m Gross Floor Area (GFA).
Being
served by an access road and as one of the major entrances to the Pat Sin
Leng Country
Park, Sha Lo Tung Area is
a nodal point of a number of popular walking trails. However, being excluded from the Country Park itself, four wheel drive
enthusiasts and war-gamers have also made the abandoned villages and farmland
their haven. Illegal immigrants
have also been found removing vegetation or even robbing hikers and the
remaining inhabitants (who were then operating small shops serving weekend visitors).
Despite
widespread appreciation amongst the public, conservationists and the scientific
community that the specialised and diverse dragonfly fauna associated with the
stream course and riparian habitats here are in urgent need of active
conservation, and despite of the paper statutory protection afforded by the
OZP, these and other habitats in the Valley are and continue to be abused by
incompatible recreation activities.
Neglect of the site in terms of a total lack of conservation management
is also taking a steady toll, with natural succession slowly but relentlessly
altering the open habitats so prized by the dragonfly fauna. Eventually these habitats will become so
densely vegetated that Hong Kong will lose one
of its most unique ecological settings.
Reconciling
the needs of nature conservation on the one hand with human use expectations on
the other can not realistically be achieved without this Project, leaving the
Valley currently unmanaged and effectively unprotected. It should also be noted that the habitat
quality within Sha Lo Tung Valley is degrading due to threats such as use of
four wheel drive vehicles, hill fires, wargames and vegetation removal.