1. The EPD aims to
take account of community concerns and operators' needs when proposing
policies and programmes. We engage stakeholders on many levels, as described
below. We also submit our policies to the scrutiny of the Legislative
Council and the Advisory Council on the Environment, and have frequent
contacts with members of both councils. District Councils are also briefed
on matters affecting their districts and have been partners in our awareness-raising
campaigns.
Engaging the Public
2. The EPD consults
the public on major policies to explain options and invite comments, either
through community-wide public consultation or smaller, more focused public
engagement workshops. For example:
i.
Public consultation was pursued for the Harbour
Area Treatment Scheme (HATS). We consulted the public over five
months in 2004 and received encouraging feedback. This was reported
to the Executive and Legislative Councils in 2005, who generally
supported our plans for collecting and treating Victoria Harbour's
sewage.
ii.
Public engagement workshops were used to seek views
on the development of integrated waste management facilities in
September 2005. Apart from the general public, various sectors of
society, such as community groups, academics, District Councils
and property management companies, were invited to discuss waste
treatment options. Their opinions will help the Government to formulate
an appropriate scheme.
iii.
Various channels were employed for collecting public
views on the waste strategy proposed under "A
Policy Framework for the Management of Municipal Solid Waste (2005-2014)".
A dedicated email account was used to receive comments from the
public. We also initiated discussions in the Public Affairs Forum
administered by the Home
Affairs Bureau to obtain views from the general public. An open
forum held by the Advisory Council on the Environment (ACE) provided
a platform for direct communication with green groups, recyclers,
other interested parties and members of the public.
3. In addition to
consulting the public, we run education programmes to raise community
awareness about environmental protection. In 2005 these programmes focused
on waste reduction and energy conservation (see Chapter
6 - Part A for details).
Engaging Operators
4. The EPD communicates
directly with operators who are the main targets of our policies. We have
formal partnership programmes with the construction
industry, restaurants,
vehicle
repair workshops and property
management companies, to provide advice, encourage greener practices
and receive feedback on our programmes. In 2005 we reviewed the method
for re-assessing the Trade Effluent Surcharge to address the concerns
of restaurants and other trades. (see Chapter
6 - Part A for details).
5. The EPD also works
with other operators to develop new policies and programmes. Since 2004
we have worked with suppliers of rechargeable batteries to develop producer
responsibility schemes. In 2005 we also worked with two charity groups,
St
James' Settlement and Caritas, on pilot schemes to recycle computers,
and waste electrical and electronic equipment.
6. Furthermore, User
Liaison Groups have been established with key sectors with potentially
significant impacts on the environment ¢w government works departments,
consultants, contractors, private developers and public corporations.
We meet periodically to discuss new developments and issues of concern.
Feedback on our Environmental Performance Report
7. The EPD is keen
to receive feedback on its Environmental Performance Report. Readers can
send us their views electronically through an online feedback
form or by email. We sent about 250 letters seeking feedback on our 2005 report from
key stakeholders, such as academics, private companies, green groups and
overseas organisations. We received three responses with positive comments
and 11 others with no comment. This year we have simplified the form.
Members of the restaurant trade and EPD attend an experience-sharing
seminar on green restaurants.
Scope
of Report
Vision
and Strategy
Organisation and Governance
Stakeholder
Engagement
Sustainability at EPD ¡V Economic Impacts
Sustainability
at EPD ¡V Social Impacts
Progress
on Year 2005 Targets
Targets for 2006
Sustainability at EPD ¡V Environmental Impacts
Part
A
Environmental Impacts of Policies and Programmes
Part
B
Environmental Impacts of Internal Operations
Appendix
I
Environmental Policy
Appendix
II
EPD
Offices and Facilities
Appendix
III
Environmental performance reports of government bureaux/departments and
agencies