 |
|
|
| General |
 |
In designing a noise mitigation measure for
a particular situation, one has to consider a number of factors.
Some of them are as follows:
 |
(a)
|
the amount of noise reduction
provided by the noise mitigation measure;
|
|
(b) |
structural/foundation
requirement of the noise mitigation measure
require;
|
|
(c) |
land/space
requirement of the noise mitigation measure;
|
|
(d) |
any
obstruction to the use of road and pedestrian
walkway caused by the noise mitigation measure;
|
|
(e) |
any
potential hazard caused by the noise mitigation
measures by obstructing or depriving enough
emergency access, blocking drivers' view
and so on;
|
|
(f) |
other
undesirable effects caused by the noise
mitigation measure, such as insufficient
ventilation, loss of sunlight and so on;
|
|
(g) |
visual
impact of the noise mitigation measure; and
|
|
(h) |
the
capital and maintenance cost of the noise
mitigation measure and how they compare
with the same for other alternative measures.
|
It is necessary to take
into accounts the constraints applicable to a particular
situation when noise mitigation measures are being
considered.
In the next sections, we will look at some of
the constraints on the use of noise barriers and
noise enclosures and on the applicability of road
resurfacing using low-noise materials.
|
| Constraints
on the Use of Noise Barriers and Enclosures |
 |
Some of the constraints are:
 |
(a)
|
The
need to provide adequate emergency access
as a crucial safety factor in densely populated
or developed areas;
|
|
(b) |
The
proposed barriers or enclosures should not
obstruct the operation of emergency vehicles
such as fire engines and ambulances or equipment
and plant such as valves and fire hydrants;
|
|
(c) |
The
proposed barriers or enclosures should not
become a road hazard or reduce the degree
of road safety in any respect;
|
|
(d) |
The
need to avoid obstructing pedestrian flows
or interfere with street-level activities
such as loading and unloading, vehicular
access to buildings, commercial and recreational
activities;
|
|
(e) |
Ease
of maintenance;
|
|
(f) |
Disruption to traffic;
|
|
(g) |
Loss of road space;
|
|
(h) |
Degradation of air quality;
|
|
(i) |
Structural
requirements;
|
|
(j) |
Loss of sunlight;
|
|
(k) |
Landscape impact; and
|
|
(l) |
Visual impact. |
|
| Constraints
on the Use of Open-Textured Road Surfacing for
Existing Roads |
 |
The use of road
surface made of open-textured material instead
of a brushed concrete one may help to ease impact
of traffic noise by reducing noise from road/tyre
interaction. For a quick review of the principle
and application, please click here.
But an open-textured
road surface is only effective under the following
circumstances :
 |
(a)
|
The
road should be originally be paved with
brushed concrete or other similar non-open
textured suface.
|
|
(b) |
Traffic
noise from the road is the dominant noise
sources. For example, highway will be preferable.
|
|
(c) |
Flat
roads are best because slopes take too much
force from vehicles braking and climbing
for the less-solid road surface to withstand. As such, local roads with sharp bend would not give satisfactory result.
Open-textured road surface gives the best
result in reducing noise on flat road with
smooth high-speed traffic because of the
domination of road/type noise.
|
|
(d) |
Fewer
heavy vehicles would also be preferable
because engine noise, instead of road/type
noise, will dominate with the increase of
heavy vehicle proportion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|