TABLE OF CONTENTS

12     SUMMARY OF KEY ENVIRONMENTAL OUTCOMES. 12-1

12.1    Environmentally Friendly Design and Benefits of the Project 12-1

 

 

 

12                 SUMMARY OF KEY ENVIRONMENTAL OUTCOMES

12.1             Environmentally Friendly Design and Benefits of the Project

12.1.1        Environmental considerations were taken into account in the selection of preferred option, design and construction method of the Project as detailed in Section 2.  The following environmental friendly designs and benefits have been incorporated into the Project:

Provision of Eco-shoreline

12.1.2        The design for the expansion of Aberdeen Typhoon Shelter (ATS) will thoughtfully incorporate eco-shoreline features, including eco-tiles, tidal pools and seabird perch, of spanning about 570 m along the proposed breakwaters, land access and vessel impact protection system (VIPS). These elements aim to enhance biodiversity, improve ecological performance, and strengthen coastal protection, ensuring that the development aligns with principles of environmental sustainability and educational enrichment.

12.1.3        The subtidal portion of the proposed and modified breakwaters will create approximately 4.55 ha of artificial hard substrates, which could facilitate the colonisation of corals and other epibenthos.  Additionally, the construction of the proposed land access connecting to the proposed eastern breakwater will create approximately 0.2 ha of artificial subtidal hard bottom habitat.  Approximately 1,380 m of artificial intertidal habitat will be created through the construction of the proposed breakwaters as well as the proposed land access connecting to the proposed eastern breakwater. Artificial habitats created by the Project is summarised in Table 7.22.

Preservation and Promotion of Sea Caves at Coastal Protection Area

12.1.4        There are sea caves along the Coastal Protection Area (CPA) at Tai Shue Wan and Ap Lei Pai, which serve as geological archives that provide valuable insights into coastal erosion and weathering processes. Thus, the alignment of the proposed land access has been designed to follow the rocky shoreline outside the CPA, allowing visitors to appreciate the area’s natural geological features, including sea caves. Currently, access to these sea caves is limited to marine transportation or kayaking, which restricts public accessibility. The Project will provide convenient access to the sea caves via the proposed land access, enabling the public to enjoy a closer view of the natural landscape and geological features such as sea caves for both leisure and educational purposes.

Beneficial Use of Unwanted Materials Generated By Other Projects

12.1.5        The construction and demolition (C&D) materials generated from the Project, including those arising from the demolition of part of the existing breakwaters, will be reused on-site whenever feasible. These materials will primarily serve as rock fill for the proposed structures, such as the foundation for the VIPS and landfall of proposed breakwaters. Moreover, substantial infill material is still needed for the breakwaters. To address this need, C&D materials generated by other local projects and accumulated in CEDD’s Public Fill Reception Facilities (PFRFs) would also be used for the Project as infill materials. This approach will not only facilitate the beneficial use of a significant quantity of unwanted materials but also minimise the need to import raw material.

Proposed Wave Wall in the Form of Floating Breakwater

12.1.6        The original location of the proposed wave wall is on the top of the tombolo with the primary objective to attenuate the waves on the west side of the expanded area of ATS through the existing tombolo. This tombolo, formed by natural process, connects Yuk Kwai Shan and Ap Lei Pai, creating an eye-catching geomorphic feature. To preserve the natural scenery, the wave wall in the form of floating breakwater was proposed to be relocated offshore by about 70 m eastward within the Project site which could provide the same wave attenuation performance while minimising the impact on the tombolo. The Benefits of adopting floating breakwater type wave wall are summarised in the table below.

Description

Benefits

·       Consist of precast floating pontoons and concrete sinkers

·       Placement of concrete sinkers on seabed without seabed stabilisation required

·       Preserve the tombolo located between Ap Lei Pai and Yuk Kwai Shan

·       Avoid disturbing the seabed, as it eliminates the requirement of seabed stabilisation by methods like dredging and filling or deep cement mixing (DCM)

·       Minimise the potential impacts on water quality and water flow from construction

·       Reduce visible footprint significantly due to its low freeboard of about 0.6 m during both high tide and low tide comparing with traditional sloping or caisson breakwater that would have a greater freeboard of about 5 m during low tide, minimising the visual impact

Proposed Land Access Layout and Location

12.1.7        To minimise the impact to the existing shoreline of Tai Shue Wan, particularly the existing sea caves, which falls within the CPA, the proposed land access connecting to the proposed eastern breakwater and Tai Shue Wan promenade is to be constructed offshore with shallow foundation.

Proposed Shortening of Existing Western Breakwater

12.1.8        Various options of demolition including full demolition and partial demolition are reviewed and analysed.  To resume the footprint of the existing breakwater for mooring purpose, it is required to demolish the breakwater structure as well as dredging at the seabed as deep as -10 mPD to -15 mPD to remove all hard materials.  As the additional mooring space that could be provided by full demolition option is minimal, it is proposed to maintain the major part of the existing western breakwater in-situ by shortening of part of the breakwater of approximate 70 m and removing the breakwater structure down to -5 mPD without dredging works at seabed, which could straighten the passageway for marine vessels to navigate to/ from the existing Aberdeen South Typhoon Shelter with sufficient water depth. This approach aims to avoid disturbing the seabed, thus minimising potential water quality impacts from the modification and to minimise generation of C&D materials while maintaining adequate water depth for vessel navigation.

Proposed Eastern and Western Breakwaters Alternative Structure Form

12.1.9        It was recommended to adopt vertical type caisson breakwaters as the main structural form while sloping rubble mound is adopted at the breakwater landfalls. Vertical type caisson breakwater would require a smaller footprint and thus reduce the scope of seabed stabilisation as well as disturbance to the seabed, and together prefabrication of breakwater components off-site, have less impact on water quality, marine ecology and landscape. Furthermore, the construction time could be significantly reduced with the use of pre-fabricated units.

Adoption of Shallow Foundation for the Proposed Land Access

12.1.10     The existing shallow rockhead along the proposed alignment of land access presents a favourable opportunity for the adoption of shallow foundation. Moreover, as the proposed land access will be located within the sheltered area with less wave loading, use of shallow foundation could provide the required structural loading capacity.  This type of foundation eliminates the need for extensive pilling works for construction, effectively reducing the disturbance to the seabed and marine ecosystem.

Construction Method for Breakwaters Foundation

12.1.11     In view of numerous environmental issues resulted from dredged method, e.g. water quality problem and dispersion of contaminant, DCM is adopted to avoid dredging works. DCM enhances the stability of the seabed and foundation for breakwater structures and hence reduce the risk of erosion and collapse over time. The enhanced stability and durability can contribute to the long-term protection of the coastal areas and reduce the need for frequent maintenance or reconstruction, which in turn decreases the overall environmental footprint of the Project.

Low-Carbon Design for Construction

12.1.12     Green construction technologies, including low-carbon concrete and Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer reinforcement, will be adopted where feasible to reduce the overall carbon emission from the production of conventional concrete and steel reinforcement.

Construction Method for Main Structures

12.1.13     To further reduce the impacts on air, noise and water quality, the proposed breakwaters and floating breakwaters will be constructed with prefabricated units whenever practical. The units will be manufactured off-site in a controlled environment, thereby eliminating the need for on-site casting and curing of concrete. This approach may significantly reduce the duration and intensity of on-site construction activities, leading to a shorter construction period. Consequently, the potential for particulate matter generations, construction noise, and water pollution, such as runoff and sedimentation, will be minimised.

Consideration of Construction Sequence

12.1.14     Given that the construction of the proposed breakwaters, involving seabed stabilisation works and caisson unit installation, has the longest duration compared to the proposed wave wall in the form of floating breakwater and proposed land access, these breakwaters works will commence first.  The other works, such as proposed land access and proposed wave wall in the form of floating breakwater, can then proceed in parallel with the proposed breakwaters construction.  This approach optimises the Project timeline by addressing the most time intensives works upfront.

12.1.15     To shorten the constriction period for the breakwaters, multiple work-fronts will be considered to allow different work activities to proceed in parallel. It is assumed that two work-fronts comprising sand blanket and geo-textile laying plants along with DCM plants will be deployed at the same time across various locations. Concurrent stabilisation of multiple seabed sections accelerates the overall construction and shortens the duration of potential environmental impacts, thereby enhancing the Project’s environmental performance.

Consideration of Integration of Tai Shue Wan Public Pier to Proposed Eastern Breakwater

12.1.16     It was originally proposed to provide two piers at Tai Shue Wan and Deep Water Bay under separate project.  Upon review by the Government, it is decided to integrate the function of the proposed Tai Shue Wan pier, taking the form of landing steps with ramps, into the proposed eastern breakwater under the Project, so as to create synergy while saving overall costs[1].

12.1.17     The proposed public landing facility would adopt the structural form of a multiple landing steps with ramps, embedded into the vertical face of the eastern breakwater near the landfall.   Fenders would be installed at the berthing face to protect breakwater structure.  Typical marine facilities for public landing steps such as bollards, handrailing, marine notice board, etc. would also be provided to serve the intended pier function.

12.1.18     This integration will also enhance efficient utilisation of marine space for mooring and navigation purposes. The integration also averted the necessity for an extra concurrent project, thereby alleviating the additional environmental impacts that would arise from the construction of a separate pier at Tai Shue Wan, such as seabed disturbance and noise generation.

 



[1] As for the proposed pier at Deep Water Bay, the proposal is put on hold by the Government until there is a clearer direction on the future development at the lower park of Ocean Park.