Contract No: DC/2001/09

 

San Tin Eastern Main Drainage Channel

 

Environmental Monitoring & Audit

Quarterly Report

 

- Oct – Nov 2006 -

 

CLIENT:

PREPARED BY:

 

Hsin Chong Construction Co. Ltd.

 

Hsin Chong Center,

107-109 Wai Yip Street,

Kwun Tong,

Kowloon, H.K.

 

 

Lam Environmental Services

 

Room 1411-16

14/F Honour Industrial Centre

6 Sun Yip Street,

Chai Wan, H.K.

 

Telephone: (852) 2897-3282

Facsimile: (852) 2897-5509

E-mail: info@lamlab.com

Website: http://www.lamlab.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

Certified by:



 

 

 

 

                                               

Raymond Dai

Environmental Team Leader

 

 

 

DATE:

 

 

12 Jan 2007


CONTENTS

 

 

Executive Summary. I

1    Introduction. 1

1.1       Scope of the Report 1

1.2       Structure of the Report 1

2    Project Background. 3

2.1       Scope of the Project and Site Description. 3

2.2       Project Organization and Contact Personnel 3

2.3       Construction Programme and Works. 4

3    Implementation Status. 5

3.1       Status of Regulatory Compliance. 5

3.2       Implementation of Pollution Control / Mitigation Measures. 5

4    Monitoring Requirements. 6

4.1       Air Monitoring. 6

4.2       Noise Monitoring. 6

4.3       Water Quality Monitoring. 7

4.4       Monitoring Parameters and Frequency. 7

4.5       Environmental Quality Criteria. 8

5    Quarterly Review of Monitoring and Compliance. 9

5.1       Air Quality. 9

5.2       Noise. 9

5.3       Water Quality. 10

5.4       Waste Monitoring Results. 10

6    Complaints, Notification of Summons and Prosecution. 11

7    Conclusion. 12

 


List of Tables

 

Table 2.2          Contact Details of Key Personnel

Table 2.3          Construction Activities   Oct-Nov 2006

Table 3.1          Cumulative Summary of Valid Licences and Permits

Table 4.1          Air Quality Monitoring Stations

Table 4.2          Noise Monitoring Stations

Table 4.4          Environmental Monitoring Parameters and Frequencies

Table 4.5a        Action and Limit Levels for Air Quality Monitoring

Table 4.5b        Action and Limit Levels for Noise Monitoring

Table 4.5c        Action and Limit Levels for Water Quality Monitoring

Table 5.1          Quarterly Air Quality Monitoring (24-hr TSP) Summary

Table 5.2          Quarterly Noise Monitoring Summary

Table 6a           Environmental Complaints Log

Table 6b           Cumulative Statistics on Complaints

Table 6c           Cumulative Statistics on Successful Prosecutions

 

 

List of Figures

 

Figure 2.1         Location Plan

Figure 4.1         Layout of Environmental Monitoring Stations

Figure 5.1a-b    Graphical Plots of 24-hr and 1-hr TSP Levels

Figure 5.2         Graphical Plots of Noise Levels

Figure 5.3a-j     Graphical Plots of Water Quality

 

 

List of Appendices

 

Appendix A      Organization Chart

Appendix B      Implementation Schedule of Mitigation Measures

 

 


Executive Summary

 

 

This is the Quarterly Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) report for Oct-Nov 2006 under DSD Contract No.: DC/2001/09 – San Tin Eastern Main Drainage Channel.  This report presents the environmental monitoring and auditing (EM&A) findings based on data and information recorded from the period 1st Oct to 30th Nov 2006.

 

Construction Activities for the Reported Period

During this reporting period, the principal work activities include:

Location

Construction Works

Section 9

·          Geotechnical Instrument Monitoring

·          Road Works Construction

·          Landscape works

·          Construction of u-channel

Section 10

·          Geotechnical Instrument Monitoring at Storage Pond

·          Wetland Landscaping

·          Construction of u-channel and chain link fence

·          Variation Order No. 134 - 3 rail parapet and security fence along Border Road

 

Air Quality Monitoring

9 occasions of 24-hr monitoring and 27 occasions of 1-hr monitoring of Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) were conducted at the monitoring stations AM1. There were no exceedances to the Action and Limit levels during the reported period.

 

Noise Monitoring

9 occasions of daytime and night-time noise monitoring and 8 occasions of holiday noise monitoring were carried at the monitoring station NM1(A). There was no valid exceeedance reported during the reported period.

 

Water Quality Monitoring

Water quality monitoring was carried out at the monitoring station WM1, WM2 WM3 and WM4 on 6 occasions for reference purpose after agreed by EPD dated 24 October 2006.  3 limit level exceedances for DO; 3 limit level exceedances for turbidity and 4 limit level exceedances for SS were recorded in this reporting period.  All exceedances are confirmed to be irrelevant to the construction operations of contract DC/2001/09.

 


Waste Management

During this reporting period, 53.04 ton C&D material was generated from the works.  No treated soil was disposed at Tuen Mun Area 38.   7.78 ton general refuse was disposed to landfill.  No chemical waste was collected by licensed collector.

 

Complaints, Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions

There was no complaints, notification of prosecutions or summons in this reporting period.

 

 


1                      Introduction

 

 

 

1.1                    Scope of the Report

 

Effective from 1 September 2005, Lam Environmental Services (LAM) has been appointed by Hsin Chong Construction to work as the Environmental Team (ET) to implement the Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) programme for DSD Contract No. DC/2001/09 – San Tin Eastern Main Drainage Channel  previously conducted by Stanger Asia Limited.

 

This report presents the environmental monitoring and auditing work carried out in accordance to the Main Drainage Channels and Poldered Village Protection Scheme for San Tin, NWNT: Environmental Impact Assessment Study, Environmental Monitoring and Audit Manual” during the period 1st Oct to 30th Nov 2006.

 

The following information relating to this project is documented in the EM&A Manual and, to avoid duplication, it is not presented in detail within the Quarterly report.

 

·          Event-Action Plans;

·          Full set of environmental mitigation measures and;

·          Contracted environmental requirements.

 

 

1.2                    Structure of the Report

 

Section 1         Introduction – details the scope and structure of the report.

 

Section 2         Project Background – summarizes background and scope of the project, site description, project organization and contact details of key personnel, construction programme and works undertaken during the reporting period.

 

Section 3         Implementation Status – summarizes the status of Environmental Permits / Licenses, implementation of environmental protection and pollution control / mitigation measures in an updated schedule for the reporting period.

 

Section 4         Monitoring Requirements – summarizes all monitoring stations, parameters, frequency and quality performance limits.

 

Section 5         Quarterly Review of Monitoring Results – summarizes the status and review of monitoring, compliance, graphical plots of trends and waste management status in the reporting period.

 

Section 6         Complaints, Notification of Summons and Prosecution – summarizes the complaints, notification of summons and successful prosecution for breaches of environmental legislation and the actions taken within the reporting period.

 

Section 7         Conclusion and Recommendations

 

 


2                      Project Background

 

 

 

2.1                    Scope of the Project and Site Description

 

The construction works under contract no. DC/2001/09 mainly comprise the removal and disposal of contaminated materials, the construction of a reinforced concrete channel, footpaths, drainage works, roadworks, water and landscape works from the Castle Peak Road at San Tin to the Shenzen River some 2.5km downstream.

 

The site layout plan is shown in Figure 2.1.

 

 

2.2                    Project Organization and Contact Personnel

 

Under the organization chart, Resident Engineer, Contractor, Independent Environmental Checker, Environmental Team are appointed to manage and control environmental issues for the construction phase of DC/2001/09. Overall responsibilities and duties of the team are found in the corresponding EM&A Manual.  Key personnel and contact particulars are summarized in Table 2.2:

 

The organization chart for the EM&A programme is attached in Appendix A.

 

Table 2.2          Contact Details of Key Personnel

 

Post

Name

Contact No.

Contact Fax

E-mail

Environmental Protection Officer

Ms. Pauline Choi

2835 1847

2591 0558

paulinechoi@epd.gov.hk

Engineer’s Representative

Ir. C.L. Leung / Ir. Gary K.C. Yip

2574 7400

2827 8700

yipgary@dsd.gov.hk

Site Agent

Keniel Kong

2482 9587

2482 9113

KenielK@hcg.com.hk

Independent Environmental Checker (IEC)

Dr. Gui Yi Li

2911 2233

2805 5028

GuiYi.Li@hyderconsulting.com

Environmental Team Leader (ETL)

Raymond Dai

2975 3300

2897 5509

raymonddai@lamlab.com

 


2.3                    Construction Programme and Works

 

Construction activities carried out during this reporting period are summarized in Table 2.3:

 

Table 2.3          Construction Activities   Oct-Nov 2006

 

Location

Construction Works

Section 9

·          Geotechnical Instrument Monitoring

·          Road Works Construction

·          Landscape works

·          Construction of u-channel

Section 10

·          Geotechnical Instrument Monitoring at Storage Pond

·          Wetland Landscaping

·          Construction of u-channel and chain link fence

·          Variation Order No. 134 - 3 rail parapet and security fence along Border Road

 


3                      Implementation Status

 

 

 

3.1                    Status of Regulatory Compliance

 

A summary of the current status on licences and/or permits on environmental protection pertinent to the Project is shown in Table 3.1.

 

 

Table 3.1          Cumulative Summary of Valid Licences and Permits

 

Permits and/or Licences

Reference No.

Issued Date

Expiry Date

Status

Environmental Permit

EP-124/2002

28-03-2002

-

Issued

Registration of Waste Producer

WPN5113-542-H2913-22

24-01-2003

-

Issued

Notification of Works Under APCO

-

-

-

Notified

Effluent Discharge Licence

1S49/1

04-08-2003

31-08-2008

Issued

Effluent Discharge Licence for Septic Tank System

1S41N/1

20-03-2003

-

Issued

Construction Noise Permit

GW-RN0116-06

22-03-2006

21-09-2006

Expired

 

 

 

3.2                    Implementation of Pollution Control / Mitigation Measures

 

The contractor implemented various environmental mitigation measures as recommended in the EIA report. The implementation schedule is presented in Appendix B.

 

 


4                      Monitoring Requirements

 

Locations of environmental monitoring stations are referred in Figure 4.1.

 

 

4.1                    Air Monitoring

 

The project has 1 air monitoring station, namely AM1.  Details of the air monitoring stations are summarized in Table 4.1.

 

Table 4.1          Air Quality Monitoring Stations

 

Station

HK Metric Grid (Easting / Northing)

AM1

826006E / 840543N

 

Monitoring methodology and calibration details shall be referred to respectively monthly reports.

 

 

 

4.2                    Noise Monitoring

 

The project has two designated Noise Monitoring Stations, namely Tung Chan Wai (NM1) and the pumping station (NM2). Noise monitoring for the pumping station (NM2) shall only be carried out on two occasions, day 1 and day 60 of the commissioning stage.  For NM1, due to distance from the works area to the village, and the expanse of container activities in between, a small residential dwelling at Yan Shau Wai slightly to the north of the Tung Chan Wai has been identified as being a more representative monitoring location, coded as NM1(A) for construction phase noise impact monitoring.  Details of noise monitoring stations are summarized in Table 4.2.

 

Table 4.2          Noise Monitoring Stations

 

Station

HK Metric Grid (Easting / Northing)

Description

Measurement

NM1(A)

825982E / 840137N

Small residential house at Yan Shau Wai slightly to the north of the Tung Chan Wai

Façade

 

Monitoring methodology and calibration details shall be referred to respectively monthly reports.

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.3                    Water Quality Monitoring

 

The EM&A Manual for this project has proposed one upstream station (WM1), one down stream station (WM2) within the San Tin Eastern Main Drainage Channel and, one upstream station (WM4) and one downstream station (WM3) at the discharge point for the San Tin Drainage Channel, once completed, within the Shenzhen River to be monitored for water quality.

 

Monitoring methodology and calibration details shall be referred to respectively monthly reports.

 

 

 

4.4                    Monitoring Parameters and Frequency

 

Environmental monitoring programme has been scheduled according to the requirements stipulated in the Brief for EM&A produced for the Project summarized in Tables 4.4.

 

Table 4.4          Environmental Monitoring Parameters and Frequencies

 

Station(s)

Parameter

Frequency

AM1

24-hr TSP

1-hr TSP

Once in every 6 days

Three times in every 6 days

NM1

LAeq(30 min), L90 & L10

Once a week between 0700-1900 hours on normal weekdays

 

LAeq(5 min), L90 & L10

Once a week between 1900-2300 hours

Once a week between 2300-0700 hours

Once a week between 0700-1900 hours on holidays

WM1, WM2, WM3, WM4

Temperature, pH, DO, turbidity, SS, NH3-N and water depth

Once per week

 


4.5                    Environmental Quality Criteria

 

Environmental quality criteria were determined prior to the commencement of the construction of the project for the purpose of impact monitoring.  Various levels established based on the results of baseline monitoring stipulated in the EM&A manual are summarized in Tables 4.5a, 4.5b and 4.5c respectively.

 

Table 4.5a        Action and Limit Levels for Air Quality Monitoring

 

Parameter

Action Level (µg/m3)

Limit Level (µg/m3)

24-hr TSP

225

260

1-hr TSP

390

500

 

Table 4.5b        Action and Limit Levels for Noise Monitoring

 

Time Period

Parameter

Action Level

Limit Level

Normal Working Hours: 0700-1900 hrs

LAeq(30min)

When one documented complaint is received

75 dB(A)

Restricted Hours:

Evenings: 1900-2300 hrs

Sundays & Holidays: 0700-2300 hrs

LAeq(5min)

70 dB(A)

Restricted Hours: 2300-0700 hrs

LAeq(5min)

55 dB(A)

 

 

Table 4.5c        Action and Limit Levels for Water Quality Monitoring

 

Parameter

Action Level

Limit Level

Dissolved Oxygen

0.59 (5%-ile of baseline data) for WM2 (downstream station)

0.55 (1%-ile of baseline data) for WM2 (downstream)

0.46 (5%-ile of baseline data) for WM3 (downstream station mid-ebb tide)

0.39 (1%-ile of baseline data) for WM3 (downstream station mid-ebb tide)

Turbidity, SS, NH3-N

120% of upstream control station at the same tide of same day

130% of upstream control station at the same tide of same day

pH

-

6-9

 

Note:

1.        For DO, non-compliance of the water quality limits occurs when monitoring result is lower than the limits.

2.        For SS and Turbidity, non-compliance of the water quality limits occurs when monitoring result is higher than the limits.

3.        For pH, non-compliance of the water quality limits occurs when monitoring result is larger than pH value 9 or lower than pH value 6.

 

 


5                      Quarterly Review of Monitoring and Compliance

 

 

5.1                    Air Quality

 

The air quality monitoring results of 1-hr TSP and 24-hr TSP sampled at AM1 in this reporting period are reviewed and summarized in Tables 5.1.  Graphical trend is presented in Figure 5.1a-b.

 

Table 5.1          Quarterly Air Quality Monitoring (24-hr TSP) Summary

 

Parameter

No. of monitoring

No. of Valid Exceedance

Compliance %

24-hr TSP

9

0 (AL); 0 (LL)

100%

1-hr TSP

27

0 (AL); 0 (LL)

100%

 

There were no data losses in air quality monitoring and no exceedance reported for 24-hr TSP monitoring and 1-hr TSP monitoring in this reporting period.

 

 

 

5.2                    Noise

 

The noise monitoring results measured at NM1(A) in this reporting period are reviewed and summarized in Tables 5.2.  Graphical trend is presented in Figure 5.2.

 

Table 5.2          Quarterly Noise Monitoring Summary

 

Period

No. of monitoring

No. of Valid Exceedance

Compliance %

Daytime

9

0 (AL); 0 (LL)

100%

Night time

9

0 (AL); 0 (LL)

100%

Holiday

8

0 (AL); 0 (LL)

100%

 

 

There were no data losses in noise monitoring and no exceedance reported during this reporting period.  Such results indicate minimal noise impact was created by DC/2001/09 activities.


5.3                    Water Quality

 

Due to shallow depth of the river and the occupation of dense vegetation around the vicinity of monitoring station, water samples could hardly be taken.  As requested by EPD dated 24 October 2006, it was agreed that the nearest locations were identified for water quality monitoring for reference purpose.

 

The water quality monitoring results measured and tested for WM2 and WM3 in this reporting period are reviewed and summarized in Tables 5.3.  Graphical trend is presented in Figure 5.3a–j.

 

Table 5.3          Quarterly Water Quality Monitoring Summary

 

Parameters, units

Quarterly Averaged

130% beyond baseline data

Exceedance (Y/N)

WM2

WM3

WM2

WM3

WM2

WM3

pH

7.3

7.2

5.16 – 9.58

5.04 – 9.36

N

N

DO, mg/L

1.1

2.3

0.64

0.56

N

N

Turbidity, NTU

48.1

29.9

51.1

75.7

N

N

SS, mg/L

104.2

74.3

92

83

Y

N

NH3-N, mg/L

58.7

29.6

52.0

36.1

Y

N

 

The exceedances over 130% beyond baseline conditions observed are the suspended solid and ammoniacal nitrogen parameters.   Work for DC/2001/09 has been confirmed to be fully completed in the vicinity of the monitoring locations and any exceedance(s) could very likely be due to the tidal interference from Shenzhen River and dead vegetation around the sampling locations. 

 

 

5.4                    Waste Monitoring Results

 

During this reporting period,

·          53.04 ton C&D material was disposed at public fills at Tuen Mun Area 38;

·          No treated soil was disposed;

·          7.78 ton general refuse was disposed at landfills;

·          No chemical waste was collected by a licensed collector.

 


6                      Complaints, Notification of Summons and Prosecution

 

No complaint, inspection notice, notification of summons or prosecution was received in this reporting period.  Cumulative complaint log, summaries of complaints, notification of summons and successful prosecutions are presented in Table 6a, 6b and 6c respectively.

 

Table 6a           Environmental Complaints Log

 

Complaint Log No.

Date of Receipt

Received From and Received By

Nature of Complaint

Date Investigated

Outcome

Date of Reply

STEMDC 001

 

28-07- 2003

EPD

Dead fish in the pond caused bad odour and potential mosquito breeding.

29-07-2003

No visible cause can be identified attributed to construction activities.

29-07-2003

 

 

 

Table 6b           Cumulative Statistics on Complaints

 

Environmental Parameters

Cumulative No. Brought Forward

No. of Complaints This Month

Cumulative No. Project-to-Date

Air

-

-

-

Noise

-

-

-

Water

1

-

1

Waste

-

-

-

Total

1

-

1

 

 

Table 6c           Cumulative Statistics on Successful Prosecutions

 

Environmental Parameters

Cumulative No. Brought Forward

No. of Successful Prosecutions this month (Offence Date)

Cumulative No. Project-to-Date

Air

2

-

2

Noise

-

-

-

Water

-

-

-

Waste

-

-

-

Total

2

-

2

 


7                      Conclusion

 

 

The EM&A programme was carried out in accordance with the EM&A Manual requirements, minor alterations to the programme proposed in the previous EM&A Report were made in response to changing circumstances.

 

3 limit level exceedances for DO; 3 limit level exceedances for turbidity and 4 limit level exceedances for SS were recorded in this reporting period.  All exceedances are confirmed to be irrelevant to the construction operations of contract DC/2001/09.

 

There was no notice of compliant or prosecution reported in this reporting period.  Such results indicate that the construction operation generally performed acceptablly against the noise, air and water quality environmental auditing criteria.