10              hazard to life Assessment for dangerous goods

 

10.1          Introduction

10.1.1    This Section of the report presents the findings of a hazard assessment for the Draft RODP developed in the NLDFS in accordance with Study Brief Clause 6.2 (c) (xii).  No risk comment is required for construction or operation of CKWLR.

10.1.2    The findings on Hazard to Life contained in this section are based on previous hazard assessment studies since the proposed developments do not contribute to any significant increase in population in the vicinity of existing and proposed hazardous installations.

10.2          Relevant Legislation and Guidelines

10.2.1    The EIA Ordinance requires that the risks associated with developments in the vicinity of potential sources of hazard to population (e.g. Dangerous Goods storage facilities) comply with the Risk Guidelines in Annex 4 of the EIAO TM.  This is demonstrated through the undertaking of a risk assessment.

10.2.2    Section 4 of Chapter 11 of the Hong Kong Planning Standards and TMGuidelines requires that any new development within the consultation zone of a Potentially Hazardous Installation must comply with the Risk Guidelines

10.3          Background Information

10.3.1    Within the NLDFS Study Area, there are various potential sources of hazard which may pose a constraint on future development of the area.  These are listed below:

·                      Siu Ho Wan Water Treatment Works (WTW), which is classified as a Potentially Hazardous Installation (PHI);

 

·                      the chlorine unloading jetty associated with the WTW (near the North Lantau Refuse Transfer Station);

 

·                      the planned Tang Lung Chau Dangerous Goods Anchorage (DGA);

 

·                      Dangerous Goods (DG) marine traffic through the Kap Shui Mun Fairway;

 

·                      the Towngas high pressure gas pipeline which has a landfall at the Luk Keng headland and runs along the North Lantau coast to Tai Ho; and

 

·                      the development of the Theme Park at Penny’s Bay which will store and use fireworks and sodium hypochlorite. This includes the loading /unloading quay for the fireworks and the sodium hypochlorite.

 

10.3.2    The impacts from the above hazard sources on the proposed Draft RODP for NLDFS are discussed in the following paragraphs.


10.4          Evaluation of Impacts

siu ho wan wtw

 

10.4.1    Siu Ho Wan WTW is classified as a Potentially Hazardous Installation (PHI) on account of storage of hazardous chemical chlorine in one tonne drums. The Consultation Zone for WTWs classified as PHIs is 1km. Any new development with sizeable population increase within the Consultation Zone requires a Hazard Assessment to demonstrate that the risks due to the new development are acceptable in accordance with the Risk Guidelines.

10.4.2    A Hazard Assessment of Siu Ho Wan WTW (including the chlorine unloading jetty) was carried out in 1992([1]).  This assessment considered both existing and planned population in the vicinity of the WTW and the jetty.

10.4.3    The proposed NLDFS developments within the Consultation Zone do not contribute to any significant increase in population from that assumed in the 1992 Hazard Assessment Study. The draft RODP does not propose any residential or sensitive uses within the consultation zone of the WTW.

10.4.4    The only new development with increase in population will be the promenade linking an Eco-Park about 2 km north-east of Siu Ho Wan WTW to Tai Ho new town. The promenade passes by the chlorine unloading jetty and, at its closest point of approach, lies about 400 m from Siu Ho Wan WTW.  The promenade may include cycle ways.

10.4.5    The population([2]) on the promenade will however, be transient population and the total number is expected to be less than 500.

10.4.6    Considering the above, the additional risks due to the NLDFS developments within the Consultation Zone of Siu Ho Wan WTW are not considered to be significant.

10.4.7    It is noted that, since completion of the 1992 Hazard Assessment, WSD are considering uprating Siu Ho Wan WTW, which may involve additional chlorine storage and usage. The Project Profile submitted to EPD suggests an increase in storage and usage of chlorine from the current amount of 73 tonnes to 84 tonnes([3]).  The upgrading of the Siu Ho Wan WTW would require a separate EIAO application and if the upgrading works require an increase in chlorine storage, a separate hazard assessment will also be required.

Potential Tang Lung Chau Dangerous Goods Anchorage

10.4.8    The potential Tang Lung Chau DGA is proposed to be located approximately 200 m to the south-east of Ma Wan and will be approximately 1 km by 600 m in overall dimension, as shown on Figure 2.4e.  The DGA will be protected by breakwaters with two entry/exit points into the Ma Wan Fairway.  The DGA is proposed to have 72 moorings and is proposed to be open 24 hours a day for use by DG vessels, whether laden or empty.

10.4.9    The potential Tang Lung Chau DGA will replace the existing Tsuen Wan DGA.  A Hazard Assessment for the new DGA was carried out in 1995([4]), which assessed the risks posed by the proposed DGA to nearby population, including future development.  The populations considered were principally those associated with the nearby shipping channels and the island of Ma Wan.

10.4.10The Draft RODP shows that the nearest development (the proposed Tsing Chau Tsai reclamation on the north-east coast of North Lantau) lies 500 m from the proposed DGA.  The maximum effect distance for incidents arising at the DGA was assessed in the 1995 study to be 152 m (distance to 3% probability of fatality for a fireball due to an incident involving a DG category 5 material coming into contact with a red hot hull following an explosion).  Therefore the presence of the DGA poses no constraint to the Tsiing Chau Tsai reclamation as envisaged.

Dangerous Goods Marine Traffic

10.4.11The Kap Shui Mun Fairway passes between the proposed Tang Lung Chau DGA and the proposed Tsing Chau Tsai reclamation on the north-east coast of North Lantau.  The Ma Wan Fairway/Kap Shui Mun Fairway serve as routes for a number of DG marine traffic to destinations in the Mainland, as well as to the Aviation Fuel Receiving Facility at Sha Chau.

10.4.12A small portion of the proposed Tsing Chau Tsai reclamation in the north-east comes within 350m of the Kap Shui Mun Fairway. The remaining part of the reclamation is further away.  Also, the number of vessel movements in the Kap Shui Mun Fairway is low as most of the DG vessels to and from the proposed Tang Lung Chau DGA and mainland China would use the Ma Wan Fairway

10.4.13Hence, the marine DG traffic through the Kap Shui Mun Fairway is not expected to pose any significant risks to the development on the shoreline of the proposed Tsing Chau Tsai reclamation.

Towngas High Pressure Gas Pipeline

10.4.14The Towngas high pressure gas pipeline has a landfall on the eastern side of the Luk Keng headland, where there is a offtake and pigging station.  The pipeline then runs along the North Lantau coast to Tai Ho, where there is another offtake and pigging station.  The pipeline contains Towngas (a mixture of 48% hydrogen, 29% methane, 20% carbon dioxide and 3% carbon monoxide) at a pressure of up to 35 barg.

10.4.15Based on the previous Hazard Assessment Study([5]) for high pressure gas pipelines the distance over which restrictions may apply may be taken as 60 m corresponding to the fireball radius following ignition of a release from full-bore rupture of the pipeline.  Any high density development, e.g. high rise residential or commercial development, if proposed to be located within this zone should be subject to a hazard assessment study.

10.4.16The proposed NLDFS Draft RODP has no high rise residential nor commercial location within 60 m from the pipeline, and, therefore, the existing pipeline poses no constraint to the Draft RODP developments.

Proposed Risk to Life from the Theme Park and Associated Developments at Penny’s Bay

10.4.17The proposed Theme Park in Penny’s Bay comprises an EIAO Designated Project and will involve storage, transport and use of fireworks and sodium hypochlorite.  A Risk to Life Assessment on this has been carried out as part of the Schedule 2 Theme Park EIA and associated developments and is summarised below.

10.4.18The assessment includes the loading/unloading quay for dangerous goods (fireworks and sodium hypochlorite), storage and use on site and the hazards posed by them. The fireworks and sodium hypochlorite will be stored in “back of house” area restricted to public access. The fireworks and sodium hypochlorite deliveries will be made in the night when the Theme Park will be closed to the public.

10.4.19High safety standards and operating practices will be adopted by the Theme Park operator. These are presented in the Theme Park EIA.

10.4.20The risk to life due to fireworks and sodium hypochlorite storage, transport and use were found to be in the ‘acceptable’ region of the Hong Kong Risk Guidelines.

10.5          Risk Assessment Conclusions

10.5.1    Based on the identification of hazard sources within the NLDFS Study Area, the proximity of the proposed NLDFS developments to these hazard sources and the additional population due to the proposed NLDFS developments, it is found that the proposed developments considered in the Draft RODP do not contribute to any significant increase in overall risks from the hazard sources. The impact summary is included in Table 10.5a.

10.5.2    It is, therefore, concluded that the Draft RODP are compatible with Hong Kong Risk Guidelines and are feasible from hazard to life considerations.

 

Table10.5a - Impact Summary Table

Issue

Operational Impact

Assessment Points

Population within the NLDFS Study Area

Relevant Criteria

Societal and Individual Risk Guidelines in Annex 4 of EIAO TM

Potential Impacts

See Hazard Assessment of Theme Park EIA

Mitigation Measures

See Hazard Assessment of Theme Park EIA

Residual Impacts

Acceptable

Environmental Acceptability

Acceptable

 



([1]) ERM -Hong Kong, North Lantau Water Supply Project, CE 12/91, 1992 Hazard Assessment

([2]) Population is based on a broadbrush estimate and constitutes transient tourists rather than stable population.

([3]) http:\\www.info.gov.hk\epd\eia\register\latest\esb046.pdf

([4]) ERM-Hong Kong, Tsuen wan Dangerous Goods Anchorage : Alternative Site Search Study- Stage 2 Study, Volume 2: Risk Assessment, Marine Department, 1995.

([5]) ERM-Hong Kong, Proposed High Pressure Steel Gas Pipeline from Tai Po Tsai to Tseung Kwan O (ETPE), HKCG, 1998