7                         Terrestrial and marine ECOLOGY

 

Introduction

 

7.1                   This section of the EIA report presents an assessment of the potential impacts on the terrestrial and marine ecological resources associated with the improvement work at Castle Peak Road between Ka Loon Tsuen and Siu Lam.  The project will include road widening between Ka Loon Tsuen and Tai Lam Kok, minor dredging (14,348 m2 of area), reclamation of seabed (8,034 m2 of area) and construction of a viaduct between Tai Lam Kok and Siu Lam section.  Based on field surveys undertaken and the relevant literatures reviewed, this section provides a description of the physical environmental background and ecological baseline information, predicts and evaluates the significance of impacts and recommends mitigation measures where appropriate. 

 

Environmental Legislation, Standard and Guidelines

 

7.2                   This section makes reference to the following guidelines, standards, documents and HKSAR Government ordinances and regulations when identifying habitats and species of ecological importance, evaluating and assessing potential impacts of the proposed development on the ecological resources in and around the study area:

 

·        Forests and Countryside Ordinance (Cap. 96) and its subsidiary legislation, Forestry Regulations;

·        Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap. 170);

·        Town Planning Ordinance (Cap 131);

·        Country Parks Ordinance (Cap 208) and associated subsidiary legislation;

·        Marine Parks Ordinance (Cap 476) and associated subsidiary legislation;

·        Waterworks Ordinance (Cap 102);

·        Site of Special Scientific Interest Register;

·        Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines (HKPSG) Chapter 10, “Conservation”

·        Works Branch Technical Circular 24/94 (Planning, Environmental and Lands Branch Circular 3/94) on Tree Preservation;

·        Works Branch Technical Circular No. 4/97 (Planning, Environment & Lands Branch Technical Circular No. 1/97) Guidelines for Implementing the policy on Off-site Ecological Mitigation Measures;

·        Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap 499) and the associated Technical Memorandum on the Environmental Impact Assessment Process (EIAO-TM), Annex 8 and Annex 16.

 

7.3                   The report also makes reference to the following international conventions:

 

·        Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (the “Bonn Convention”), which requires parties to protect listed threatened or endangered migratory species occurring within their boundaries;

·        United Nations Conventions on Biodiversity (1992);

·        The PRC National Protection List of Important Wild Animals;

·        Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of PRC for the Protection of Migratory Birds and their Environment;

·        Agreement on the protection of Migratory Birds and Their Habitats by the Governments of Japan and the PRC; and

·        IUCN Red Data Books

 

Terrestrial Ecology

 

Assessment Methodology

 

7.4                   The establishment of the baseline terrestrial ecological profile of the study area was based on recent field surveys as well as a review of the existing terrestrial ecological information.  Two Environmental Impact Assessment reports and the Preliminary Project Feasibility Study for the proposed project were mainly referenced:

 

·        Route 10 – North Lantau to Yuen Long Highway Investigation and Preliminary Design as Agreement No. CE 82/97

·        Feasibility Study for Castle Peak Road Improvements between Ka Loon Tsuen and Yau Kom Tau

·        Preliminary Project Feasibility Study – Improvement to Castle Peak Road Between Ka Loon Tsuen and Siu Lam

 

7.5                   The terrestrial ecological study area covered 500 m from either side of the proposed alignment and particular focus was given to areas that may be directly affected by the project. 

 

7.6                   Broad ecological field surveys were then undertaken to supplement and field check the data collected through the baseline/literature review process, covering the representative habitats of the study area.  Vegetation/habitat surveys were conducted by a botanist to identify different habitats and vegetation species.  Wildlife such as mammals, reptiles and amphibians, insects (butterflies and dragonflies) was searched by an ecologist on foot in different representative habitats.  An avian specialist recorded bird audibly and visually by visiting different suitable habitats.  The areas within 100m from the construction work were surveyed intensively by walking through different habitats randomly.  Other remaining areas were selectively surveyed.  Freshwater habitats i.e., Tai Lam Chung River and fishpond were also visited and the field sampling points were shown in Figure 7.1.  All the field data was collected between April and July 2000 covering the wet season (survey schedule refers to Appendix 7.1).  The surveys were carried out for whole day.

 

7.7                   Based on the literature review and the information gathered from the field surveys, the habitat types within the project limit were classified as woodland, tall shrubland, grassland / shrubland mosaic, backshore vegetation, mudflat village / orchard, developed area, active / abandoned farmland, wasteland, plantation and fishpond vegetation.  Habitat map showing the locations of various habitat types in the study area is shown in Figure 7.2.  Species list of flora and fauna is given in Appendix 7.2.  Representative photographs of flora with conservation interests are shown in Appendix 7.4.

 


Description of the Environment

 

Habitat / Vegetation

 

Woodland

 

7.8                   Woodlands within the study area were found in scattered patches at Tai Lam with an average height of more than 6 m.  The majority of the woodlands found were recorded next to villages and orchards.  Due to their proximity to villages and orchards, introduced tree species such as Dimocarpus longan, was occasionally found.  A total of 91 plant species were recorded.  Plant species recorded were typical of woodlands in Hong Kong.  No single dominant plant species was recorded in the study area.  Frequent tree species recorded included common species, such as, Acronychia pedunculata, Adiantum flabellulatum, Albizia lebbeck, Bytteria aspera, Celtis sinensis, Gnetum montanum, Microcos paniculata and Schefflera octophylla.  The plant species recorded suggested that these habitats were typical of secondary woodlands in Hong Kong.  Five restricted plant species , Adiantum philippense (Wu & Lee 2000), Celtis philippinensis, Dimocarpus longan, Ipomoea stolonifera and Vitis balanseana (Xing et al. 2000), were recorded in the woodlands.

 

Tall Shrubland

 

7.9                   Tall shrubland is a transitional stage in ecological succession between shrubland and woodland.  The tall shrubland recorded comprised of woody vegetation with average heights ranging from 2 – 3 m.  Tall shrublands occurred in scattered patches at Tai Lam but were continuous at Siu Lam, and a total of 52 species were recorded in the study area.  Plant species such as, Acronychia pedunculata, Dalbergia benthamii, Eurya nitida, Gahnia tristis, Gordonia axillaris and Litsea rotundifolia, were frequently found.  Two restricted plant species, Cansjera rheedii and Celtis philippinensis (Xing et al. 2000), were found but no rare or protected species were recorded during the field surveys. 

 

Grassland / Shrubland Mosaic

 

7.10               The grassland / shrubland mosaic was the dominant habitat type at the Tam Lam (Figure 7.2).  The species composition of this habitat was mainly herbaceous or woody plant species with an average height of less than 1.5 m.  A total of 49 plant species including 3 rare or protected species, Alloteropsis semialatus, Platycodon grandiflorus and Thysanotus chinensis, were recorded (see Figure 7.2).  Major plant species including the common shrub Baeckea frutescens, Arundinella setosa, and Eulalia quadrinervis were recorded.  The plant species present indicated that such habitat had been frequently disturbed by hill fires.

 

Backshore vegetation

 

7.11               A total of 43 plant species were recorded in the backshore vegetation habitats.  Vegetation found at the backshore of sandy beaches included dominant plant species of Clerodendrum inerme and Vitex rotundifolia.  No rare or protected species were recorded during the field surveys.

 


Mudflat

 

7.12               A narrow strip of coastal mudflat was located along the Tai Lam Chung River.  The coastal mudflat was dominated by Sesuvium portulacastrum, Suaeda australis and Zoysia sinica.  A total of 10 plant species including a restricted plant species, Thespesia populnea (Xing et al. 2000), were recorded and neither rare nor protected species were found.

 

Village / Orchard

 

7.13               A total of 41 tree species including two restricted plants, Dimocarpus longan and Manilkara achras, were recorded in the villages and orchards.  Common fruit trees such as Clausena lansium and Dimocarpus longan were frequently recorded.  Tree species associated with human activity such as Macaranga tanarius were commonly observed, while typical secondary woodland tree species such as Bridelia tomentosa were also found.  No rare or protected species were found.

 

Developed area

 

7.14               Developed areas were found along the Tai Lam Chung River.  Three restricted plant, Celtis philippinensis, Plumbago zeylanica and Ricinus communis (Xing et al. 2000), were recorded.  Landscape trees such as Acacia confusa and Albizia lebbeck were frequently encountered.  Neither rare nor protected plants were recorded among the 57 recorded species.

 

Active / Abandoned Farmland

 

7.15               There were three patches of farmland within the study area (Figure 7.2).  Plant species including Dimocarpus longan, Litchi chinensis, Conyza canadensis, Mikania micrantha and Panicum maximun were frequently encountered.  Twenty-five species including four restricted plants, Litchi chinensis, Celtis philippinensis, Dimocarpus longan and Vitis balanseana (Xing et al. 2000), were recorded and neither rare nor protected species were found.  

 

Wasteland

 

7.16               This habitat is defined as man-made habitat free of development which has suffered severe human disturbance.  Small patches of wasteland were found in the study area.  A total of 32 plant species including a restricted plant, Thespesia populnea (Xing et al. 2000), were recorded and neither rare nor protected species were recorded.

 

Plantation

 

7.17               Plantations were generally found along the Castle Peak Road.  Ornamental species, Acacia confusa, was commonly recorded.  A total of 49 plant species including a restricted plant, Vitis balanseana (Xing et al. 2000), were recorded and no rare or protected species were found.

 


Fishpond vegetation

 

7.18               There was a small area of fishpond adjacent to the Tai Lam Chung River.  Dominant plant species, Paspalum distichum, was recorded and no rare or protected plant species were found among the 18 recorded species.

 

Tai Lam Chung River

 

7.19               The stream is largely natural in the upper portions but the end connecting to the sea had been channelised.

 

Wildlife and Fauna

 

Mammals

 

7.20               No mammal was recorded during the field survey.

 

Avifauna

 

7.21               A total of 27 species of birds were recorded within the study area. All species were common and typical to rural Hong Kong. During the first field survey, a total of 24 species were seen and the Crested Bulbul, Pycnonotus jocosus was the dominant species recorded.  During the second survey, 22 species were recorded and House Swift, Apus affinis, was the dominant species. The findings of these field surveys are presented in Appendix 7.2.  Potential breeding activities including begging food juveniles of the White Wagtail at Tai Lam River and a food-carrying adult of the White-breasted Kingfisher was recorded, but no nest was observed (see Figure 7.3 for locations).

 

Amphibian / Reptile

 

7.22               One small Smooth Skink, Leiolopisma reevsi, was recorded during the field survey. 

 

Invertebrates

 

7.23               Thirteen butterflies species were recorded during the field survey.  Only one uncommon species, Graphium sarpedon, was found.  No other invertebrates of conservation interest were recorded during the current field surveys.

 

Fish

 

7.24               No rare, endangered, nor endemic stream fish species were found at Tai Lam Chung River.  Because of the influence of the marine water, marine fish species including Rockfish, Sebasticus marmoratus, Chicken Grunt, Parapristipoma trilineatum, Cardinal fish, Apogon quadrifasciatus, and Yellow-finned Sea-bream, Mylio Latius were occasionally found at the lower reaches of the Tai Lam Chung River.

 

7.25               Marine species including Spotted Scat, Scatophagus argus, and Yellow-finned Sea-bream, Mylio Latius, were found in the man-made fishpond.

 


Ecological Sensitive Receivers

 

7.26               Based on literature review, the Tai Lam Country Park is of conservation interest in and within the vicinity of the study area.  The Country Park within the studying boundary is dominated by shrublands and grasslands.  As the proposed development may include potential new reclamation and massive construction, far field ecological sensitive receivers may need to be identified.  These potential off-site ecological sensitive receivers include the Tai Lam Chung Reservoir and feng shui woods at So Kwun Wat.

 

Assessment Criteria

 

7.27               Evaluation and assessment of potential impact on ecological resources will be conducted in accordance with Annexes 8 and 16 of the EIAO-TM.  The criteria used for evaluating the significance of an ecological impact will include:

 

Habitat quality;

Species;

Size / Abundance;

Duration;

Reversibility; and

Magnitude

 

7.28               The criteria used for evaluating a site / habitat will include:

 

Naturalness and age of habitats;

Size;

Rarity of habitats and species;

Diversity;

Re-creatability;

Fragmentation;

Ecological Linkage;

Potential value;

Abundance/species richness; and

Presence or absence of breeding/nursery ground

 

7.29               The criteria used for evaluating species found within a site / habitat will include:

 

Protection status;

Distribution; and

Rarity

 

7.30               The significance of impacts will be ranked as “minor”, “moderate” or “severe” based on the criteria listed above. The description of the ranking are as below:

 

7.31               Minor - Impacts to species or groups are assessed as “minor” if the predicted impact would result in a slight, and/or short-term reduction in the local population numbers or geographic distribution of a species or group, but the species or group is predicted to recover from the perturbation with no-long term adverse impacts.  Impacts to habitat are assessed as “minor” when the habitat is widely distributed locally and that no rare, protected or conservation importance species are found in the habitat.

 

7.32               Moderate – Impacts to species or groups are considered “moderate” if the predicted impact would result in probably non-recoverable and/or long-term reduction in population numbers. However, the species in question should be considered widely distributed or common, and abundant on a local, regional or global scale. Impacts to habitat are assessed as ‘moderate” if the habitat is of limited local or regional distribution or declining in extent and that the habitat has a potential of supporting fauna and/or flora of conservation or regulatory importance.

 

7.33               Severe – Impacts to species or groups are judged to be “severe” if the predicted impact has an adverse effect on species or groups which are rare, protected or of conservation importance locally, regionally, or globally. Impacts to habitat are considered to be “severe” if the habitat in question is of limited local or regional distribution or declining in extent and that it contains rare, protected or conservation importance species or generally considered by the scientific community to be of local, regional or global importance to the support of wild fauna.

 

7.34               If impacts on ecological resources are found to be significant (i.e. moderate or severe), mitigation measures will be recommended in accordance with the Technical Memorandum.  Impact mitigation will be sought in the following priority: avoidance, minimisation, on-site compensation and off-site compensation. Impact avoidance generally consists of modifications to the preferred development options, but may in some extreme cases require abandonment of the project. Impact minimisation includes any means of reducing the scope or severity of a given impact, for example through timing of construction programme, modification in the design or ecological restoration of disturbed areas following the completion of works. Impact compensation will be recommended if the effect on a given species or habitat is irreversible and attempts will be made to compensate it elsewhere e.g. enhancement, creation of suitable habitats or recreation of the habitat. Compensation can be on site or off site. Off-site compensation will only be recommended if the residual ecological impacts require mitigation and all practicable on-site ecological mitigation measures have been exhausted. The off-site mitigation measures shall be on a “like for like” basis and will be conducted in accordance with the Works Branch Technical Circular No. 4/97.

 

Ecological Importance

 

7.35               An evaluation of the ecological importance of the recorded habitats in the study area has been determined in accordance with the EIAO-TM Annex 8 criteria.

 

Woodland and Tall Shrubland

 

·        Naturalness: Natural habitats but subjected to moderate human disturbance.

·        Size: The woodlands are approximately 8 ha, and the tall shrublands are approximately 20 ha in the study area.

·        Diversity: The diversity of the woodlands and tall shrublands is moderate.

·        Rarity: No rare or protected species were found in the habitats.  Five restricted plant species, Adiantum philippense, Celtis philippinensis, Dimocarpus longan, Ipomoea stolonifera and Vitis balanseana, were recorded in the woodlands and two restricted plant, Cansjera rheedii and Celtis philippinensis were recorded in the tall shrublands. 

·        Re-creatability:  It will take approximately 10 to 20 years for the woodland to be recreated.  The vegetation type of the tall shrublands is secondary and readily recreated naturally and would recover easily from disturbance.

·        Fragmentation: The woodlands are generally not fragmented except a small part at Ka Loon Tsuen.  The tall shrublands are fragmented into small areas.

·        Ecological Linkage: Some of the woodlands and tall shrublands are linked to the Tai Lam Country Park.

·        Potential value: The potential value of the woodlands and tall shrublands is considered moderate.

·        Nursery/Breeding Ground: The woodlands and tall shrublands located east of the Tai Lam Chung River are suspected to be a potential breeding area of White-breasted Kingfishers.

·        Age: The woodlands and tall shrublands are relatively mature.

·        Abundance/Richness of Wildlife: Low to moderate wildlife richness and abundance according to the survey results.

·        Ecological value: Moderate

 

Grassland / Shrubland Mosaic

 

·        Naturalness: Natural habitat but subjected to human disturbance and hill-fire frequently.

·        Size: The grassland / shrubland mosaic are approximately 34 ha in the study area.

·        Diversity: The diversity of grassland / shrubland mosaic is low.

·        Rarity: Three rare or protected species, Alloteropsis semialatus, Platycodon grandiflorus and Thysanotus chinensis were found.

·        Re-creatability: The vegetation type is secondary and readily recreated naturally and would recover easily from disturbance.  However, recolonisation by the same rare or protected plant species is not guaranteed.

·        Fragmentation: The grassland / shrubland Mosaic are generally not fragmented.

·        Ecological Linkage: Some grassland / shrubland mosaic are linked to the Tai Lam Country Park.

·        Potential value: The potential value of the grassland / shrubland mosaic is considered moderate.

·        Nursery / Breeding Ground: No record of breeding ground was found.

·        Age: The habitats are frequently disturbed and therefore are secondary in nature.

·        Abundance / Richness of Wildlife: Low wildlife richness and abundance according to the survey results.

·        Ecological value: Moderate.

 

Backshore vegetation and Mudflat

 

·        Naturalness: Natural habitat with moderate human disturbance.

·        Size: The backshore vegetation is approximately 2 ha and the mudflat is approximately 0.1 ha in the study area.

·        Diversity: The diversity of the backshore vegetation and mudflat is low.

·        Rarity: No rare species found.  A restricted plant species, Thespesia populnea, was recorded in the mudflat.

·        Re-creatability: The habitats can be easily re-created.

·        Fragmentation: The backshore vegetation and the mudflat are generally not fragmented but always have a linear shape.

·        Ecological Linkage: The present habitats are not functionally linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity in a significant way.

·        Potential value: The potential value of the backshore vegetation and mudflat is considered low.

·        Nursery / Breeding Ground: No record of breeding ground was found.

·        Age: Not applicable.

·        Abundance / Richness of Wildlife: Low wildlife richness and abundance according to the survey results.

·        Ecological value: Low.

 

Village / Orchard, Developed area and Active / Abandoned Farmland

 

·        Naturalness: All are man-created habitats.

·        Size: The villages / orchards are approximately 12 ha, the developed areas are approximately 10 ha and the active / abandoned farmlands are approximately 1.7 ha in the study area.

·        Diversity: The diversity of these habitats are low

·        Rarity: No rare or protected species were found.  Three restricted species, Celtis philippinensis, Plumbago zeylanica and Ricinus communis were recorded in developed area, and four restricted plant species, Litchi chinensis, Celtis philippinensis, Dimocarpus longan and Vitis balanseana were recorded in active / abandoned farmland.

·        Re-creatability: These man-made habitat types can be re-created easily.

·        Fragmentation: These habitats are generally fragmented into small areas.

·        Ecological Linkage: The present habitats are not functionally linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity in a significant way.

·        Potential value: The potential value of these man-made habitats is considered low.

·        Nursery / Breeding Ground: No record of breeding ground was found.

·        Age: Not applicable.

·        Abundance / Richness of Wildlife: Low to moderate wildlife richness and abundance according to the survey results.

·        Ecological value: Low.

 

Wasteland and Plantation

 

·        Naturalness: All are man-made habitats.

·        Size: The wastelands are approximately 1 ha and the plantations are approximately 2.9 ha in the study area.

·        Diversity: The diversity of these habitats is low.

·        Rarity: No rare or protected species were found.  A restricted plant species, Thespesia populnea, was recorded in wasteland, and a restricted plant species, Vitis balanseana, was recorded in plantation.

·        Re-creatability: These habitats are secondary and readily re-created artificially and would recover easily from disturbance.

·        Fragmentation: These habitats are generally fragmented into small areas.

·        Ecological Linkage: The present habitats are not functionally linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity in a significant way.

·        Potential value: Low value for artificial habitats.

·        Nursery / Breeding Ground: No record of nursery or breeding ground.

·        Age: Not applicable

·        Abundance / Richness of Wildlife: Low wildlife richness and abundance according to the survey results.

·        Ecological value: Low.

 

Fishpond

 

·        Naturalness: The fish pond is man-created habitats

·        Size: The size is approximately 2040 m2.

·        Diversity: The species diversity of the man-made habitats is low.

·        Rarity: No rare / protected plant species were recorded.

·        Re-creatability: This man-made habitat can be re-created easily.

·        Fragmentation: Not applicable.

·        Ecological Linkage: The present habitat is not functionally linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity in a significant way.

·        Potential value: Low value for man-made habitats

·        Nursery / Breeding Ground: No record of nursery or breeding ground was found.

·        Age: Not applicable

·        Abundance / Richness of Wildlife: Low wildlife richness and abundance according to the survey result.

·        Ecological value: Low.

 

Tai Lam Chung River

 

·        Naturalness: The stream is largely natural with the stream end had been channelised but subjected to frequent human disturbance such as fishing activities.

·        Size: Not applicable

·        Diversity: The species diversity is low.

·        Rarity: No rare or protected species were found.

·        Re-creatability:  The stream habitat can be re-created artificially.  However, recolonisation by the similar stream fauna and flora are not guaranteed. 

·        Fragmentation:  Not applicable

·        Ecological Linkage: The present habitat is not functionally linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity in a significant way.

·        Potential value:  The potential value is moderate to low

·        Nursery / Breeding Ground: The brackish habitat is not a fishery nursery ground.  Breeding activities of White Wagtail was recorded but is not a suitable breeding ground for white wagtail.

·        Age: Not applicable.

·        Abundance / Richness of Wildlife: Low wildlife richness and abundance according to the survey result.

·        Ecological value: Low.

 

7.36               Based on the ecological conditions presented in the above sections, it is considered that the backshore vegetation and mudflat within the study area have generally low value because of their low species diversity and most of the species identified are common in Hong Kong.

 

7.37               The ecological value of the village / orchard, developed area, active / abandoned farmland, wasteland and plantation is limited given that frequent human disturbance and low species diversity in these habitat types.

 

7.38               The grassland / shrubland mosaic is considered to have a moderate ecological value because three rare / protected plant species were identified in these areas.

 

7.39               The woodland and tall shrubland have low to moderate wildlife richness and abundance and are suspected to be a potential breeding ground of White-breasted Kingfishers.  The ecological value is moderate.

 

7.40               The fishpond and the Tai Lam Chung River are considered to have low ecological value as the fishpond is man-made habitat and limited to wildlife, and the Tai Lam Chung River mouth has already been channelised and its natural habitat has been disturbed.

 

7.41               Flora of ecological interest identified within the study area (refer to Figure 7.2 for location) comprised of three rare / protected plant species of conservation interest including Alloteropsis semialatus, Platycodon grandiflorus and Thysanotus chinensis.

 

7.42               An evaluation of identified species of ecological interest recorded in the study area has been determined in accordance with the EIAO-TM Annex 8 criteria and is shown in Table 7.1.

 

Table 7.1            Evaluation of Floral Species with Ecological Interest within Study Area

 

Species

Growth Form

Abundance

Protection Status

Distribution

Rarity

Alloteropsis semialatus

Herb

Occasional

Not Protected

Kau Keng Shan

Rare

Platycodon grandiflorus

Herb

Scarce

Protected

Grassland in Pokfulam, Sai Kung and Tuen Mun

Restricted

Thysanotus chinensis

Herb

Scarce

Not Protected

Nine Pin Island and Eastern Pat Sin Lang.

Rare

 

 

Identification of Environmental Impacts

 

Construction Phase

 

7.43               The potential terrestrial ecological impacts arising from the project construction activities may include:

 

·        Direct impacts to the terrestrial habitat and the associated wildlife community as a result of road construction.

·        Indirect impact to the surrounding habitats and the associated wildlife due to increased human activities and background noise.

 

Operational Phase

 

7.44               The potential terrestrial ecological impacts arising from the project operational activities may include:

 

·        Indirect impact to the surrounding habitats and associated wildlife due to increased human activities and background noise.

 

Impact Evaluation

 

Construction Phase

 

Cumulative impact

 

7.45               It is known Route 10 NLYLH’s Siu Lam Link Road and Castle Peak Road Improvement from Sham Tseng to Ka Loon Tsuen will be undertaken in or immediately in the vicinity of the Study Area of the project.  However, it is not anticipated that there would be any significant cumulative impact on ecological resources because the ecological impacts of respective projects would be localised and there is a general absence of high ecologically value areas in the vicinity.

 

Direct impact

 

7.46               It has been estimated that the natural terrestrial habitats within the study area that are likely to be lost due to the road improvement works include approximately 2 ha of backshore vegetation, 0.2 ha of wasteland, 0.4 ha of plantation and 0.1 ha of tall shrubland.  All these habitats are of low ecological value and therefore adverse impact to the terrestrial ecology is not anticipated.

 

7.47               The potential impact on wildlife associated with these habitats that will be directly loss is considered to be minor given that no species of ecological importance were recorded during the survey within these areas.  In addition, wildlife from habitat lost would be displaced to similar habitats available in the surrounding area.  The uncommon butterfly would also find its fruit plant in the surrounding area.

 

7.48               The rare / protected plant species identified is approximately 200m away from the vicinity of the construction site, therefore adverse impacts due to construction activities is not anticipated.

 

7.49               Because of the remoteness of the far field ecological sensitive receivers, Tai Lam Chung Reservoir (approximately 2 km from the nearest construction site) and feng shui woods at So Kwun Wat (approximately 2 km from the nearest construction site), adverse impact due to construction activities is not anticipated.

 

Indirect impact

 

7.50               Indirect impacts to terrestrial ecology may arise from increased human activities associated with construction work, such as material storage and construction site runoff, if uncontrolled.  These potential impacts to the surrounding habitats and associated wildlife are not expected to be high because of the temporary nature of the construction work given that regular checks on good construction practice is recommended.

 

7.51               Indirect impacts, such as elevation of suspended sediment, to Tai Lam Chung River may arise from construction activities due to construction site runoff.  These potential impacts to the Tai Lam River are not expected to be high because of the temporary nature of the construction work given that good construction practice is anticipated.

 

7.52               The bird community associated with the terrestrial ecological resource in the study area may be temporary disturbed or displaced due to increase human activities and background noise.  The birds may be displaced to similar habitats available in the surrounding area and recolonisation of the area after the construction activity has completed is anticipated.

 

7.53               Breeding activities of bird species recorded in the study area may be temporary disturbed due to increased human activities and background noise.  However, all bird species recorded are commonly found in Hong Kong and therefore adverse impact is not anticipated.

 

Operational phase

 

7.54               During the operational phase, given that the low abundance and richness of the animal wildlife recorded as presented, the impact due to increased human activity and background noise is expected to be minor.

 

7.55               The bird community associated with the study area may be displaced to similar habitats available in the surrounding area due to increased background noise.  In view of the fact that majority of the birds recorded in the study area are commonly found in Hong Kong and that the terrestrial habitats are located in close vicinity to major highway, it is anticipated that displacement may be temporary and the bird community will recover from the perturbation with no long-term adverse impact.

 

Overall Impact

 

7.56               Based upon the discussion in Section 7.45 to 7.55, the terrestrial ecological impact associated with Improvement to Castle Peak Road development is considered low as evaluated in accordance with Annex 8 of the EIAO-TM in the following section.

 

Woodland

 

·        Habitat quality: The habitat quality is moderate.

·        Species: No woodland will be directly impacted due to construction activities.  There may be potential indirect impact to the wildlife inhabiting the area.

·        Size / Abundance: No direct habitat loss to the woodland.

·        Duration: The duration of impacts will persist during construction and operation phases.

·        Reversibility: The indirect impact to the wildlife inhabiting the secondary woodland is reversible.

·        Magnitude: Minor.

 

Tall shrubland, Grassland and Shrubland Mosaic

 

·        Habitat quality: The habitat quality is moderate.

·        Species: No rare or protected plant species including the Alloteropsis semialatus, Platycodon grandiflorus and Thysanotus chinensis will be directly impacted.  There may be potential indirect impact due to increased human access or uncontrolled construction activities as they are approximately 200m away from the construction sites.

·        Size / Abundance: Loss of area of the tall shrubland will be approximately 0.1 ha.  No direct habitat loss to the grassland and shrubland mosaic.

·        Duration: The duration of impacts will persist during construction and operation phases.

·        Reversibility: The impact of loss of habitat due to construction work is irreversible.

·        Magnitude: Minor.

 

Backshore vegetation and Mudflat

 

·        Habitat quality: The habitat quality is low

·        Species: No rare or protected plant species will be directly impacted.  However, there may be potential direct or indirect impact to the wildlife inhabiting the areas.

·        Size / Abundance: Loss of backshore vegetation will be approximately 2 ha.  No direct habitat loss to the mudflat.

·        Duration: The duration of impacts will persist during construction and operation phases.

·        Reversibility: The impact of loss of habitat due to construction work is irreversible.

·        Magnitude: Minor.

 

Village, Orchard, Developed area, Active / Abandoned farmland, Wasteland and Plantation

 

·        Habitat quality: The habitat quality is low

·        Species: No rare or protected plant species will be directly impacted.  However, there may be potential direct or indirect impact to the wildlife inhabiting the areas.

·        Size / Abundance: Approximately 0.2 ha of wasteland and 0.4 ha of plantation will be lost.  No direct habitat loss to the village/orchard, developed area and active/abandoned farmland habitats.

·        Duration: The duration of impacts will persist during construction and operation phases.

·        Reversibility: The impact of loss of habitat due to construction work is irreversible.

·        Magnitude: Minor.

 

Fishpond

 

·        Habitat quality: The habitat quality is low

·        Species: No freshwater habitat will be directly loss due to construction activities.  However, there may be potential indirect impact to the wildlife inhabiting the area.

·        Size / Abundance: No direct habitat loss to the freshwater habitat.

·        Duration: The duration of impacts will persist during construction and operation phases.

·        Reversibility: The indirect impact to the wildlife inhabiting the fishpond is reversible.

·        Magnitude: Minor.

 

Tai Lam Chung River

 

·        Habitat quality: The habitat quality is low

·        Species: No brackish water habitat will be directly loss due to construction activities.  However, there may be potential indirect or indirect impact to the wildlife inhabiting the area

·        Size / Abundance: No direct habitat loss to the brackish water habitat.

·        Duration: The duration of impacts will persist during construction and operation phases.

·        Reversibility: The indirect impact to the wildlife inhabiting the area is reversible.

·        Magnitude: Minor.

 

Mitigation of Adverse Environmental Impacts

 

Habitat / Vegetation loss

 

7.57               On-site planting should be provided to compensate for loss of vegetation due to construction activities.  Table 7.2 shows the locations and areas proposed for the on-site planting.  Species used for planting should take reference from the species identified in the present tree survey and be native to the Hong Kong.  Reference should also make to the landscape mitigation measures mentioned in Sections 9.

 

Table 7.2            Summary of Compensatory Woodland and Amenity Planting

 

Location of compensatory woodland and amenity planting

Area of compensatory planting (Ha)

Amenity planting zones separating the new road alignment

1.59

Woodland planting areas  disturbed land and old road alignment and adjacent amenity tree and shrub planting

1.04

Total

2.63

 

 

Construction Practice

 

7.58               Erect fences where practical along the boundary of construction sites before the commencement of works to prevent tipping, vehicle movements, and encroachment of personnel into adjacent areas, particularly where the rare/protected species are located.

 

7.59               Reinstate temporary work sites / disturbed areas to its original condition immediately after completion of the construction.

 

7.60               Check the work site boundaries regularly to ensure that they are not exceeded and that no damage has been caused to surrounding natural habitats.

 

7.61               Prohibit and prevent open fires within the site boundary during construction and provide temporary fire fighting equipment in the work areas.

 

7.62               Other good construction practices should be implemented to minimise any disturbance to ecological resources, as recommended in the other sections of this report, including dust suppression measures in Section 3 and noise control measures in Section 4, surface runoff control in Section 5, and marine sediments management measures in Section 6.

 

Evaluation of Residual Environmental Impacts

 

7.63               With the implementation of the above recommended mitigation measures, it is considered that there would be no adverse residual ecological impacts.

 

Environmental Monitoring and Audit

 

7.64               No Environmental monitoring and audit is required.

 

Conclusion

 

7.65               The ecological resources within the study area comprises a variety of habitat types including woodland, tall shrubland, grassland/shrubland mosaic, backshore vegetation, mudflat, village/orchard, developed area, active/abandoned farmland, wasteland, plantation and fishpond and Tai Lam Chung River.  The terrestrial ecological impact associated with Improvement to Castle Peak Road Development is considered low.  Grassland/shrubland mosaic were found to support three rare/protected plant species, Alloteropsis semialatus, Platycodon grandiflorus and Thysanotus chinensis.  No direct impact to the rare/protected plant species due to construction is anticipated.

 

7.66               The road improvement works will result in the permanent loss of approximately 2 ha of backshore vegetation, 0.2 ha of wasteland, 0.4 ha of plantation and 0.1 ha of tall shrubland.  All these habitats are of low ecological value and therefore adverse impact to the terrestrial ecology is not anticipated.

 

7.67               Mitigation measures for the construction are recommended to minimise or avoid the potential impacts on the terrestrial ecology.  No adverse residual impact is expected.

 

 

Marine Ecology

 

Assessment Methodology

 

7.68               The establishment of the baseline marine ecological profile of the study area was based on recent field surveys as well as a review of the existing marine ecological information.  Two Environmental Impact Assessment reports and the Preliminary Project Feasibility Study for the proposed project were mainly referenced:

 

·        Route 10 – North Lantau to Yuen Long Highway Investigation and Preliminary Design as Agreement No. CE 82/97

·        Feasibility Study for Castle Peak Road Improvements between Ka Loon Tsuen and Yau Kom Tau

·        Preliminary Project Feasibility Study – Improvement to Castle Peak Road Between Ka Loon Tsuen and Siu Lam

 

7.69               Field surveys were undertaken to supplement and field check the data collected through the literature review process.  Areas of ecological interest that would be directly or indirectly affected by the proposed project were surveyed by a marine ecology team.  All the field data was collected between April and July 2000 (Appendix 7.1).

 

7.70               Based on the literature review and the information gathered from field surveys, the marine ecological habitats in the study area are mainly categorised into subtidal and intertidal.  A habitat map showing the natural boulder coast, artificial seawall, and beach is presented in Figure 7.4.  Representative photographs of coastal habitats is shown in Appendix 7.5.

 

Description of the environment

 

7.71               The study area falls mainly within the North Western Water Control Zone. The Environmental Protection Department (EPD) conducts regular marine water quality monitoring in the area and the most relevant monitoring stations to the study area are NM2 and NM1. According to the 1998 EPD water quality monitoring results, the water quality of the nearby waters was generally turbid (annual means, 6.5 – 7.3 NTU), moderate surface dissolved oxygen level (annual means, 5.5 – 6.2 mg/L), moderate in inorganic nutrients (annual means total nitrogen in the nearby areas 1.14 –1.22 mg/L and annual means total phosphorus of the nearby areas 0.05 – 0.06 mg/L), and low in both E. coli (annual geometric means, 110 – 300 cfu/100ml) and faecal coliforms (annual geometric means, 600 – 1300 cfu/100ml).

 

7.72               The following review of habitats/species is separated into subsections: soft bottom benthos, intertidal and marine mammals.

 

Soft Bottom Benthos

 

7.73               The benthos was studied by using bottom grab within the proposed area of the Lantau Port and Western Harbour Development study (APHC, 1992).  The sampling points were in the northern area of Lantau waters nearby to the Brothers.  The bottom sediment was fairly homogeneous, with a silt content of 66%.  As in the Shin & Thompson (1982) study, polychaetes were the most abundant group of organisms found at the study sites.  The species composition was similar to the previous study with polychaete species most abundant.  Notomastus latericeus, was the most abundant of all species, composing 47% of the samples.  The study’s main findings was that the assemblages were typified by high abundance with low numbers of species and low individual biomass.

 

Intertidal

 

7.74               The coastal waters near Tai Lam Chung is low in salinity with moderately wave exposure (Morton and Morton, 1983).  The marine ecological habitats in the study area are categorized into natural boulder coast, artificial seawall and beach.  The artificial seawall is mainly located between Siu Lam and area near Ka Loon Tsuen, while the natural boulder coastline and sandy beach are located in Ka Loon Tsuen.

 

7.75               Quantitative field surveys were conducted on the natural boulder coastline and the artificial seawall at Ka Loon Tsuen in May 2000 to identify the species composition.  The survey design involved sampling throughout the intertidal zones so that the vertical range of all species was represented.  In total five transects were laid in the coastal habitats.  At each sampling point (except beach sampling location), one 30 m horizontal transects were set up at high and low shore, respectively.  Only one transect was set up at low shore of Ka Loon Tsuen sampling point.  The locations of field sampling points were shown in Figure 7.4.  On each transect, 5 quadrats (1 ´ 1 m) were placed randomly to assess the abundance and distribution of flora and fauna.  All animals found in each quadrat were identified to species level (or to genus level, at minimum) (see Appendix 7.3).

 

Natural Boulder Coastline

 

7.76               The natural boulder coastline is a typical sheltered rocky shore with little exposure to strong-waves.  A field survey was conducted to identify the species composition at the natural boulder coastline.  The field survey indicated that the assemblages were of sheltered shore communities with high quantities of winkles, Nodilittorina radiata, dominating the lower shore.  Other intertidal species including common whelk, Thais spp., limpet, Cellana toreuma, smooth limpet, Notoacmoae spp., false limpet, Siphonaria spp. and barnacles Tetraclita japonica were recorded.  No rare species was recorded in the present field survey.

 

Artificial Seawall

 

7.77               The artificial seawall has been constructed over 20 years and small marine organisms have colonized along this old reclaimed sea-edge (Maunsell Consultants Asia Ltd, 1996). A recent intertidal marine ecological study between Angler’s Bay and Butterfly Beach showed that some typical intertidal mollusks, including Nodilittorina spp, Cellana toreuma and Thais spp. were found (Chan, 1999). These organisms are expected to be present in the study area since the rocky shore along Castle Peak Road is quite homogenous, in terms of the hydrology and wave exposure (Chan, personal communication). Other marine organisms include the common neogastropod, Thais clavigera (Morton & Morton, 1983) and the pollution-tolerant bivalve, Perna viridis (Lee & Morton, 1983). Barnacles Tetraclita aquamosa with Pollicipes mitella were found in the exposed shore. On the high shore, gastropods included Nerita undata, Littorina scabra, and periwinkles Nodilittorina millegrana and N. pyramidalis were found.  In the winter, a turf-like assemblage of green alga including Rhizoclonium and Chaetomorpha spattered the middle shore (Morton & Morton, 1983).

 

7.78               A field survey was conducted to identify the species composition at the artificial seawall in Ka Loon Tsuen.  The field survey indicated that the assemblages were of moderate exposed rocky shore communities with high quantities of Littoriaria articulata dominating the higher shore and Monodonta spp. dominating the lower shore.  Other intertidal species including Nodilittorina radiata, Cellana toreuma, Notoacmaea spp., Nerita albicilla and Thais spp. 

 

Beach

 

7.79               A field survey was conducted to identify the species composition at the beach in Ka Loon Tsuen.  Five cores (diameter about 10cm, length about 40cm) were sampled at high and low shores.  The samples were sieved with 500 mm sieve and stained with rose bengal.  No macro-invertebrate (>500 mm in diameter) was recorded in the present field survey.

 

Marine Mammal

 

7.80               The Chinese White Dolphin (Sousa chinensis) occurs mainly in the western waters around Lantau Island (Jefferson, 1998). Comparatively, the area north of Lantau Island is considered the most important habitat in Hong Kong.  Chinese White Dolphin is protected under the Protection of the Wild Animals Protection Ordinance and the Animals and Plants (Protection of Endangered Species) Ordinance.  In a study (September 1995 to March 1998) to investigate the population dynamics of the dolphin, dolphins were sighted in the waters off Tai Lam Chung but close to the North Lantau coast. Chinese White Dolphins typically feed in shallow coastal areas up to 10 m deep (Jefferson, 1998). In a weekly survey conducted for a PhD study, between 1996 and 1999, the dolphin was only sighted once in the waters immediately off Tai Lam (Lai, personal communication).

 

Ecological Sensitive Receivers

 

7.81               No rare or key marine organisms were recorded (see Sections 7.71 to 7.80).  Apart from a small stretch of natural coastline at Ka Loon Tsuen, the coastline is rather homogenous due to the artificial seawall. In view of the lack of variety of natural intertidal habitat and the absence of rare or key marine organisms, it is believed that the coastline may be considered to have low ecological value.  Potential marine sensitive receivers will be the protected Chinese White Dolphin (Sousa Chinensis).

 

7.82               The road improvement works would involve dredging and reclamation. Potential far-field marine sensitive receivers may be impacted by sediment plume and potential deterioration of water quality. The nearest marine sensitive receivers include the Ma Wan Fish Culture Zone and nursery ground off the north coast of Lantau.  Assessment of impacts will be addressed in Chapter 8 regarding impacts on fisheries.

 

Assessment Criteria

 

7.83               The assessment criteria are the same as described in Section 7.27 to 7.34.

 

Ecological Importance

 

7.84               According to the Technical Memorandum of the EIAO (EIAO-TM) Annex 8 the ecological value / importance of a habitat can be evaluated using the following criteria:

 

·        naturalness;

·        size;

·        diversity;

·        rarity;

·        re-creatability;

·        ecological linkage;

·        potential value;

·        nursery ground;

·        age; and

·        abundance.

 

7.85               Based on the available literatures and discussion presented above, the current ecological assessment shows that the marine ecological resources present within the study area are considered to be of low ecological value.  This has been determined on the basis of the considerations in accordance with the EIAO-TM Annex 8 Table 2 criteria.

 

Soft bottom benthic habitat

 

·        Naturalness: The soft bottom benthic habitat is in its natural state.

·        Size: The area to be dredged is approximately 14,348 m2, and the area to be reclaimed is approximately 8,034 m2.

·        Diversity: Reviewed literatures indicated that the subtidal habitat supports low diversity assemblages.

·        Rarity: No rare / protected species were recorded.

·        Re-creatability: The subtidal habitats cannot be recreated on site.

·        Fragmentation: Not applicable.

·        Ecological Linkage: The present habitat is not functionally linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity.

·        Potential value: The potential value is low.  It is unlikely that the site can develop conservation interest as the water quality is unlikely to improve significantly in the near future.  Predicted long-term water quality showed an increasing nutrient enrichment in the coastal waters in the study area.  Long-term trend in E. coli also showed significant increase between 1989 and 1998 related to increased sewage input from nearby area.

·        Nursery / Breeding Ground: No record of significant nursery or breeding ground was found.

·        Age: Not applicable

·        Abundance / Richness of Wildlife: Low wildlife richness and abundance according to the reviewed literatures.

·        Ecological value: Low.

 

Artificial Seawall

 

·        Naturalness: The habitat is man-made.

·        Size: The artificial seawall that will be directly impact is approximately 1.1 km.

·        Diversity: The species diversity of the man-made habitats is low.

·        Rarity: No rare / protected species were recorded.

·        Re-creatability: This man-made habitat can be re-created easily.

·        Fragmentation: Not applicable.

·        Ecological Linkage: The present habitat is not functionally linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity.

·        Potential value: Low value for man-made habitats

·        Nursery / Breeding Ground: No record of significant nursery or breeding ground was found.

·        Age: Not applicable

·        Abundance / Richness of Wildlife: Low wildlife richness and abundance according to the survey result.

·        Ecological value: Low.

 

Natural Rocky Shore

 

·        Naturalness: The natural shore at Ka Loon Tsuen is disturbed by human activities through development of artificial seawall.

·        Size: The natural rocky shore that may be indirectly impacted is approximately 300m.

·        Diversity: The species diversity is low.  The intertidal communities are typical of sheltered rock shores in Hong Kong.

·        Rarity: No rare / protected species were recorded.

·        Re-creatability: If destroyed, the natural rocky shore can be recreated by artificial seawall construction.  However, re-colonisation by the same marine communities is not guaranteed.

·        Fragmentation: Not applicable.

·        Ecological Linkage: The present habitat is not functionally linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity.

·        Potential value: The potential value is low since no rare species nor species of conservation interest were found.

·        Nursery / Breeding Ground: No record of significant nursery or breeding ground was found.

·        Age: Not applicable

·        Abundance / Richness of Wildlife: Low wildlife richness and abundance according to the survey result.

·        Ecological value: Low.

 

Marine Waters off Construction Sites

 

·        Naturalness: Disturbed through residential discharges.  Close proximity to one of the busiest shipping lanes in Hong Kong.

·        Size: Not applicable

·        Diversity: Not applicable.

·        Rarity: The Chinese White Dolphin (Sousa chinensis) has been recorded in these water.

·        Re-creatability: The habitat cannot be recreated.

·        Fragmentation: Not applicable.

·        Ecological Linkage: Preferred marine mammal habitats occur to the west of this area (around the Sha Chau, Lung Kwu Chau Marine Park and the new airport).

·        Potential value: Limited value due to heavy navigational use of the area.

·        Nursery / Breeding Ground: No record of significant nursery or breeding ground was found.

·        Age: Not applicable

·        Abundance / Richness of Wildlife: Seasonal changes in the distribution patterns of dolphins were observed, with comparatively higher abundance in autumn and winter.  However, these abundances are low when compared with preferred habitats to the west.

·        Ecological value: Low as sighting of Chinese White Dolphin (Sousa chinensis) is not common in this area and this area is heavily used by marine traffic at present.

 

Identification of Environmental Impacts

 

7.86               Impacts to marine ecological resources may arise during the construction and operational phase.  Sea-based construction activities include construction of seawall, dredging and reclamation, bored piling for viaduct foundation.  The impacts may be derived from direct disturbance to the habitat and indirect disturbance through changes to key water quality parameters.

 

Construction Phase

 

7.87               The potential marine ecological impacts arising from the construction activities may include:

 

·        direct impacts from habitat loss and the associated marine species due to reclamation and the road improvement works conducted to the artificial seawall; and

·        indirect impacts to the habitat and the associated fauna due to dredging.

 

Operational Phase

 

7.88               Marine ecological impacts during the operation phase also include site runoff to adjacent waters.  Toxic chemicals/oil spilt from vehicles may enter the marine waters via the drainage system

 

7.89               The foundation of the viaduct may affect the water flow between Tai Lam Chung River mouth and the marine environment.

 

Prediction of Environmental Impacts

 

Construction Phase

 

Direct Impacts

 

Subtidal habitat

 

7.90               Dredging and reclamation in the study area will lead to the permanent loss of approximately 14,348 m2 of soft bottom benthic habitats of low ecological value.

 

Intertidal habitat

 

7.91               The artificial seawall of approximately 1.1 km will be temporarily removed due to the reclamation and the road improvement works.  However, the existing natural boulder coastline and the beach at Ka Loon Tsuen will remain intact during construction.

 

Marine Mammal

 

7.92               As cetacean are protected under the Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap 170), any lethal and sub-lethal impacts due to underwater noise on marine mammals will be deemed unacceptable.  Cetaceans are animals that rely heavily on acoustic information to communicate and to explore their environment.  Therefore, any noise that disrupts communication or echolocation channels would be potentially harmful.  High explosives produce pulses with a very rapid onset (shock waves), which change to conventional acoustic pulses as they propagate.  The reactions from impacted cetaceans can range from brief interruption of normal activities to short- or long-term displacement from noisy areas.  Strong sound may cause temporary or permanent reductions in hearing sensitivity.  No underwater blasting or percussive piling will be used in this road improvement works, therefore, adverse impact to the marine mammals, such as Chinese White Dolphin (Sousa chinensis), is not anticipated.

 

Indirect Impacts

 

7.93               The present construction adopts an approach where permanent and temporary seawalls will first be formed to enclose each phase of the reclamation and filling materials will be pumped ashore behind the seawalls.  The sediment plume is effectively contained within the reclamation area, minimising the loss of fine sediments to the adjacent water bodies.

 

7.94               Indirect impacts to marine ecology during construction include sediment release associated with the above construction works.  Potential impacts to water quality from sediment release are listed below:

 

Elevation of Suspended Solids: 

 

7.95               Sessile organisms within the benthos will be susceptible to the effects of increased sediment loads.  Effects can be lethal or sublethal through reduction in reproductive potential due to stress incurred by constantly having to flush out the depositing material.  The effects of sedimentation on organisms will also depend on other factors, such as an organism’s tolerance, growth orientation of sessile organisms and water movement.

 

7.96               Based on the prediction that the potential water quality impact due to elevation of suspended solids (approximately 37 mg/L) would confines to waters at Tai Lam Kok (see Section 5).  As the soft bottom benthic habitat in this area is of low ecological value and the intertidal communities are expected to recolonised this area after the construction activities, adverse impact due to elevation of SS is not anticipated.

 

Reduction of Dissolved Oxygen:

 

7.97               The relationships between SS originated from construction works and DO are complex, with increased SS in the water column combining with a number of other effects to reduce DO concentrations in water.  Elevated SS (and turbidity) reduces light penetration, lowers the rate of photosynthesis of phytoplankton (primary productivity) and thus lowers the rate of oxygen production in the water column.  This has a particularly adverse effect on the eggs and larvae of fish, as at these stages of development high levels of oxygen in the water are required for growth due to high metabolic rates.  DO depletions are most likely to affect sessile organisms as they cannot move away from affected areas.  As the soft bottom benthic habitats and the associated communities in the study area of low ecological value, adverse impact due to reduction of dissolved oxygen is not anticipated. 

 

Elevation of Nutrients

 

7.98               High levels of nutrients in seawater can cause rapid increases in phytoplankton often to the point where an algal bloom occurs.  An intense bloom of algae can lead to sharp decreases in the levels of dissolved oxygen in the water as dead algae fall through the water column and decompose on the bottom.  Anoxic conditions may result if DO concentrations are already low or are not replenished.  This may result in mortality to marine organisms due to oxygen deprivation.  As the soft bottom benthic habitats and the associated communities in the study area of low ecological value, adverse impact due to elevation of nutrients is not anticipated.

 

Operational Impacts

 

7.99               During the operational phase, toxic chemicals contained in gasoline oil spilled from vehicles can enter the marine waters via the drainage system and may impact ecological resources.  However, the design of the project and its safety management are expect to prevent such oil spillage from vehicles and adverse impact is not anticipated.

 

Impact Evaluation

 

Construction Phase

 

7.100           The dredging, reclamation and the associated road improvement works will result in the permanent loss of approximately 14,348 m2 of soft bottom benthic habitat and temporarily loss of approximately 1.1 km of artificial seawall.  Since the benthic community and intertidal community in the study area are of low ecological value, minor impact is envisaged.  Moreover, armour stone random placed seawall designs are proposed as this seawall designs will increase the surface area for recolonisation of marine organisms.  Therefore, it is envisaged that such seawall would not cause adverse impact to the recolonisation of intertidal marine organisms.  Similar intertidal flora and fauna existing at present are expected to recolonise at the new seawall.

 

7.101           Based on the prediction of construction phase water quality modeling, impacts to benthic and intertidal assemblages immediately outside of the reclamation site are expected to occur during the construction phase.  However, since the seabed community and intertidal community in the vicinity of the study area in Tai Lam Kok are of low ecological value and in view of the impact of suspended solids elevation is temporary, only minor impact is envisaged.

 

Operational Phase

 

7.102           Marine ecological impacts during the operational phase include site runoff to adjacent waters.  Toxic chemicals / oil spilt from vehicles may enter the marine waters via the drainage system.  However, the design of the road and its safety management are expected to prevent such oil spillage from vehicles, therefore, adverse impact to marine ecology due to oil spillage is not anticipated.

 

7.103           The foundation of viaduct involved four piles only and they are located far from the mouth of Tai Lam Chung River.  The alternation of water flow is not anticipated. 

 

Overall Impact

 

7.104           Based upon the discussion described in Sections 7.100 – 7.103, the marine ecological impact associated with proposed road improvement works is considered to be low.  An evaluation of the impact in accordance with the EIAO-TM Annex 8 Table 1 is presented as follows:

 

·        Habitat Quality: Artificial intertidal habitat of low ecological value will be lost and replaced with artificial seawalls.  Low quality soft bottom benthic habitats will be lost.  Soft bottom benthic habitats in the vicinity of the construction area will be perturbed by SS elevation but they are of low ecological value.

·        Species: No rare species nor species of conservation value were found in the study area for each type of habitat identified.

·        Size: Artificial seawall of low ecological value (approximately 1.1 km) and soft bottom benthic habitat of low ecological value (approximately 14,348 m2) will be directly impacted in the vicinity of the construction sites.  Based on the water quality assessment, the impact of SS elevation is expected to be localized in a small area, therefore, the size of the indirectly impacted area is expected to be small.

·        Duration: Increases in SS levels are expected to be low and temporary (approximately 90 day dredging at Tai Lam Kok, approximately 120 days dredging for road widening) and within environmentally acceptable level (see Section 5).

·        Reversibility:  Except for the habitat loss of the intertidal hard bottom assemblages covering approximately 1.1 km artificial seawall and subtidal soft benthos covering an area of approximately 14,348 m2, impact to the marine ecological resources within the study area are expected to be temporary and recolonisation of seawalls at the construction sites is expected to occur after the construction works.

·        Magnitude:  The impacts to the habitats identified will be of minor magnitude.

 

Mitigation of Adverse Environmental Impacts

 

7.105           Apart from the proposed use of armour stone random placed seawall construction, no mitigation measure is required since no unacceptable ecological impact is envisaged.

 

Environmental Monitoring & Audit

 

7.106           No environmental monitoring and audit is required since no unacceptable ecological impact is anticipated.

 

Conclusion

 

7.107           Literature reviews of existing information supplemented with the results of recently undertaken field surveys on marine ecological resources indicate that the intertidal habitats and soft benthic habitats within the study area are of low ecological value.  There is a sensitive receiver, Chinese White Dolphin, in the vicinity of the study area.  But their presence are unusual in or around the proposed project areas and hence impact is not envisaged.

 

7.108           The dredging / reclamation and the road improvement works will result in the permanent loss of approximately 14,348 m2 of soft bottom benthic habitat and temporary loss of approximately 1.1 km of artificial intertidal habitat.  Since the benthic community and intertidal community in the study area are of low ecological value, minor impact is envisaged.

 

7.109           Based on the prediction of construction phase water quality assessment, impacts to benthic and intertidal assemblages immediately outside the reclamation site are expected to occur during the construction phase.  However, since the seabed community and intertidal community in the vicinity of the study area are of low ecological value and in view of the impact of suspended solids elevation is temporary, minor impact is envisaged.

 

Reference

 

1.   APH Consultants (1992). Lantau Port & Western Harbour Development Studies, Environmental Survey Data Report, for Civil Engineering Department, Port Development Office.

2.   Chan, K. K. (1999). The ecology of Tetraclita squamosa and Tetraclita japonica (Crustacea: Cirripedia) in Hong Kong. Ph.D. Thesis, HKU.

3.   Corlett, R., Xing, F., Ng, S.C., Chau, L.K.C. and Wong, L.M.Y. 2000. Hong  Kong Vascular Plants: Distribution and Status. In Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society. Ed. Hodgkiss (June 2000). P1-4.

4.   Jefferson, T.A. (1998). Population Biology of the Indo-Pacific Hump-backed Dolphin (Sousa chinensis Osbeck, 1765) in Hong Kong Waters: Final Report.

5.   Lee, S. Y. & Morton, B. (1983). The Malacofauna of Hong Kong and Southern China II

6.   Maunsell Consultants Asia Ltd. (1996). Feasibility Study for Castle Peak Road Improvements between Ka Loon Tsuen and Yau Kom Tau,

7.   Morton, B. & Morton, J. (1983). The Sea Shore Ecology of Hong Kong.

8.   Shin, P. K. S. & Thompson, G. B. (1982).  Spatial distribution of the infaunal benthos of Hong Kong.

9.   Wu, S.H. & Lee, W.T.C. Pteridophytes of Hong Kong. In Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society. Ed. Hodgkiss (June 2000)P5-20

10.               Xing, F., Ng, S.C. & Chau, L.K.C. Gymnosperms and Angiosperms of Hong Kong. In Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society. Ed. Hodgkiss (June 2000)P. 21 –136

 

 

Personal Communication

 

1.   Chan, K. K. PhD.  The University of Hong Kong

2.   Lai, H. Y. PhD. Candidate.  The University of Hong Kong