5.                  FISHERIES IMPACT ASSESSMENT

 

5.1       Introduction

 

This section presents an assessment of potential impacts to fisheries associated with the construction and operation of 132kV supply circuit from the existing Pui O Substation on south Lantau Island via Chi Ma Wan Peninsula via Adamasta Channel towards Cheung Chau North and Cheung Chau South Substation. Potential sources of impact associated with the construction and operation have been identified and assessed. The Study Area is confined to the proposed submarine cable across the Adamasta Channel and formation of a small-scale reclamation temporary works area (180m2) works at Pui O Wan. Preliminary requirements for mitigation and monitoring are recommended where appropriate.  The assessment focuses on an identification and evaluation of impacts to fisheries resources, fishing operations and culture fisheries.

 

The objectives of the assessment are as follows:

 

·       to establish the importance of the habitats and fishing activity potentially affected by the construction and operation of the proposed project;

 

·       to identify fisheries sensitive receiversparameters and the area that will be affected;

 

·       to assess the scale of possible impacts to fisheries arising from the construction and  operation of the proposed works;

 

·       to highlight any insurmountable impacts to fisheries;

 

·       to identify any mitigation measures and residual impacts; and

 

·       to assess the need for a fishery monitoring and audit programme.

 

5.2       Government Legislation and Guidelines

 

The criteria for evaluating fisheries impacts are laid out in the Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process (EIA-TM) of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) (Cap 499).  Annex 17 sets out the general approach and methodology for assessment of fisheries impacts. Annex 9 recommends some criteria that can be used for evaluating fisheries impacts.  This assessment allows a complete and objective identification, prediction and evaluation of the potential fisheries impacts. 

 

Other legislation that applies to fisheries includes:

 

·       Fisheries Protection Ordinance (Cap 171) 1987 which provides for the conservation of fish and other aquatic life and regulates fishing practices; and

 

·       Marine Fish Culture Ordinance (Cap 353) 1983 which regulates and protects marine fish culture and other related issues.

 

5.3       Baseline Information

 

5.3.1     Literature Review

 

In Hong Kong, the commercial marine fishing industry is divided into capture and culture fisheries.  To assess the capture fisheries within the Study Area, the most up-to-date literature “Port Survey 1996-1997” by the Agriculture, Fisheries and Culture Department (AFCD) was reviewed. A consultancy study on “Fisheries Resources and Fishing Operations in Hong Kong Waters (1998)” (FRFO) has also been reviewed to determine the important areas for nursery and spawning grounds within the Study Area.  Mariculture fisheries information was obtained from the AFCD Annual Report 1998/99.

 

Although the proposed construction works may not lead to any loss of fishing grounds or nursery areas, the potential impacts to water quality upon the commercial fishing grounds and nursery areas within the Study Area are discussed.

 

5.3.2     Capture Fisheries

 

In 1998, the estimated fisheries production in Hong Kong Waters from both capture and culture fisheries amounted to 186,100 tonnes, valued at HK$ 2,268 million1 the capture fishery produced about 181,000 tonnes with about 90% of the catch coming from outside Hong Kong waters1.  Capture fisheries accounted for 97 % by weight of the total production.  The remaining 3 % corresponded to the culture sectors of the industry.  Within Hong Kong Waters, the highest yields for local fisheries were mainly derived from the eastern and northeastern coasts2.

 

Fishing Operations

 

The proposed construction area is within AFCD fishery area zones, Tai Long Wan (0009), Pui O (0010) and Cheung Chau (0030).  The waters of these three zones are referred to as the Construction Area. A small-scale reclamation temporary works area in shallow water (approximately 180 m2) is located at Pui O Wan east corner whereas the proposed submarine cable will be laid from Tai Long Wan East to Cheung Chau via the Adamasta Channel crossing the Tai Long Wan and Cheung Chau fishing zone. The fishing operations and fisheries resources within the adjacent fishery areas (Chi Ma Wan, 0008; Cheung Sha, 0011; Shek Kwu Chau, 0031) will also be potentially affected and are also discussed.  These three zones, combined with the three zones of the Construction Area, make up the Study Area (Figure 5.1).

 

On the basis of their ranking (Table 5-1), the fishing zones of the Study Area are of varied importance (from low to medium-high) to the Hong Kong fishing industry.  The fishing zones of low ranking include Pui O (0010), Cheung Sha (0011) and Shek Kwu Chau (0031), whereas the fishing zones of medium-high ranking include Tai Long Wan (0009), Cheung Chau (0030) and Chi Ma Wan (0008).

 

The proposed dredging/small-scale reclamationmarine works willcould potentially affect three fishing zones: Tai Long Wan (0009), Pui O (0010) and Cheung Chau (0030). Tai Long Wan and Cheung Chau are ranked medium-high whereas Pui O is ranked low to the Hong Kong fishing industry. The small reclaimed area at Pui O Wan east corner will cover only 0.018 hectares which constitutes less than 1% of the total area (596.51 ha) and provides a production value of only HK$ 31.  The impacts are likely to be negligible.

 

 

Table 5-1        Total Value (HK$), Adult Catch (kg) and Fry Catch (tails) Displayed on a Total Production, Production per Hectare and Rank (per Hectare) Basis for the Fishing Zones in the Study Area (All Fishing Vessels)

 

Fishing Area

And AFD Code

Total Production

Production (ha-1)

Rank (Production ha-1)

Adult Fish (kg)

Value (HK$)

Fry (tails)

Adult Fish (kg)

Value (HK$)

Fry (tails)

Adult Fish (kg)

Value (HK$)

Fry (tails)

Construction Area

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0009

Tai Long Wan

53,587

1,433,905

-

140

3,753

-

72

67

-

0010

Pui O

57,973

1,632,745

7,661

77

1,712

7

107

116

82

0030 Cheung Chau

834,581

16,740,978

-

241

4,835

-

36

57

-

Other Fishing Areas

 

 

 

 

 

 

0008

Chi Ma Wan

76,184

2,158,632

-

122

3,458

-

81

78

-

0011

Cheung Sha

78,347

1,749,819

7,661

76

1,712

7

107

116

82

0031

Shek Kwu Chau

216,916

5,726,170

-

64

1,689

-

118

117

-

(Source: Adopted from Port Survey 96/97, AFCD.)

 

 

The proposed dredging/small-scale reclamation works will affect three fishing zones: Tai Long Wan (0009), Pui O (0010) and Cheung Chau (0030). Tai Long Wan and Cheung Chau are ranked medium-high whereas Pui O is ranked low to the Hong Kong fishing industry. The small reclaimed area at Pui O Wan east corner will cover only 0.018 hectares which constitutes less than 1% of the total area (596.51 ha) and provides a production value of only HK$ 31.  The impacts are likely to be negligible. Although Tai Long Wan and Cheung Chau are of medium-high ranking, the small dredged area of 13.04 hectares at the Adamasta Channel (<1% of the total area of 3844.29 ha and a production value of HK$ 58,345) is predicted to exert minimal impact to the Hong Kong fishing industry. Estimation of the affected dredged area is based on the worst case scenario for the construction method by dredging instead of direct burying with 0.3m trench width.

 

The most abundant organisms in the catch from five out of the six fishery zones were classified under the mixed fish species category (Table 5-2).  The mixed fish species mainly comprise juveniles of scad (Caranx kalla), rabbit fish (Siganus canaliculatus), sardine (Sardinella sp), pony fish, (Leiognathus brevirostris) and gizzard shad (Clupanodon punctatus).  The mixed species are of very low commercial value (HK$ 1.6 kg-1) and are sold as fish feed for the mariculture industry. From the species list presented in Table 5-2, the silver shrimp (Acetes sp) is high value species (>HK$ 15 kg-1) while shrimp crad (Carnax kalla) and conger pike peel (Muraenosox cinereus) is medium value species (HK$ 10-15 kg-1).  The remainder of the catch are of low value at <HK$ 10 kg-1.The (FRFO) study final report provides information on the dependency upon the study final report provides information on the dependency upon the general area within which works will occur for various groups of fishermen in the 1996-7 survey period.  Among Cheung Chau vessels, 27 purse seiners took 73% of their catch in the Cheung Chau/South Lantau area; for 314 mixeds vessels 78% of their HK catch was from the same area although only 36% of their time was spent in HK waters; the fished area for the 131 P4/7 vessels was not detailed but only 40% of their fishing was in HK waters; while for 94 shrimp trawlers 88% of their HK catch was from the same area although 77% of their fishing was done outside HK.

 

The potential for a high dependence on the study area among particular fishermen can be further examined from the Fisheries Information Management System (FIMS) mentioned in the same study report.  The sample survey estimate shows that 382 vessels had fished the general area (Stats zones 0009, 0010, 0030 and 0031) but only 102 fished in the single zone (0009) Tai Long Wan most closely representing the works area.  Only 24 of these vessels spent 75% or more of their fishing activity in the general area.  Less than half (47) of those fishing in zone 0009 spent more than 10% of their activity in the zone and none of them more than 20% of their time.  Of those most relatively active in zone 0009, 60% (28) were either P4 or non-mechanized sampans.

 

Periodic helicopter surveys by AFCD during 2000 recorded gill netters, long-liners and shrimp trawlers as fishing in the waters between Chi Ma Wan Peninsula and Cheung Chau.

 

 

Table 5-2         Five Most Abundant Fisheries Resources Caught within the Study Area.  High and Medium Value Species are Underlined.

 

AFD Fishery Area

AFD Fishery Area Code

Most Abundant Organisms in decreasing order

Common name

Chi Ma Wan

0008

Acetes species

Mixed fish species*

Apogon/Apogonichthys species

Leiognathus brevirostris

Sillago sihama

Silver shrimp

 

Cardinal fish

Pony fish

Sand Borer

Tai Long Wan

0009

Acetes species

Mixed fish species*

Sillago sihama

Stolephorus zollingeri

Leiognathus brevirostris

Silver shrimp

 

Sand Borer

Anchovy

Pony fish

Pui O

0010

Acetes species

Mixed fish species*

Argyrosomus species

Stolephorus zollingeri

Sillago sihama

Silver shrimp

 

Croaker

Anchovy

Sand Borer

Cheung Sha

0011

Mixed fish species*

Acetes species

Argyrosomus species

Stolephorus zollingeri

Sillago sihama

 

Silver shrimp

Croaker

Anchovy

Sand Borer

Cheung Chau

0030

Mixed fish species*

Sardinella jussieu

Argyrosomus species

Acetes species

Caranx kalla

 

Saroine

Croaker

Silver shrimp

Shrimp scad

Shek Kwu Chau

0031

Mixed fish species*

Stolephorus zollingeri

Argyrosomus species

Muraenosox cinereus

Trachurus japonicus

 

Anchovy

Croaker

Conger pike eel

Scad

*      Mixed fish species composed of juveniles of Caranx kalla, Siganus canaliculatus, Sardinella sp, Leiognathus brevirostris and Clupanodon punctatus

 

 

Fisheries Resources

 

Under the consultancy study on “Fisheries Resources and Fishing Operations in Hong Kong Waters (1998) the only direct sampling of fisheries resources that was conducted near the dredging area and reclamation workstemporary working platform was gill netting at Shek Kwu Chau (G8) and trawling at South Cheung Chau (T12) (Figure 5-2). Coastal mud shrimp (Solenocera crassicornis and Solenoceridae) in night trawl sample, and mantis shrimp (Oratosquilla nepa) and goby (Gobiidae) in day trawl sample comprised the main portion of the catch in terms of weight, and number, respectively. Croaker (Sciaenidae) comprised the most abundant in the gill net catches.

 

The southern Cheung Chau and southern Lantau waters have been identified as both as spawning area and nursery ground for fisheries resources.  The Adamasta Channel falls within the defined spawning and nursery grounds shown in Figures 2 and 3 of the Executive Summary of the FRFO study.  Commercial species that have been identified as using the southern Cheung Chau waters for spawning are the Moray Eel (Gymnothorax reevesi), the Scorpionfish (Inegocia japonicus), the Scad (Caranx kalla), the Flatfish (Platycephalus indicus), the Bream (Mylio macrocephalus), the Croakers (Nibea diacanthus and Johnius belengeri), the Blue Crab (Portunus pelagicus) and the Mantis Shrimp (Oratosquilla spp). Commercial species that have been found to use the southern Lantau waters as a nursery ground for fry are the Mantis Shrimps (Oratosquilla anomala) and (Dictyosquilla foveolata) as well as both Sciaenid and Serranid fry.

 

5.3.3     Culture Fisheries

 

Only one designated Fish Culture Zone (FCZ), Cheung Sha Wan, is identified in the Study Area.  The closest distance of the FCZ at Cheung Sha Wan to the proposed submarine cable routing is approximately 5 km away and its zone area consist of 214,200m2. There are no figures available for individual production at this FCZ, although Hong Kong production in 1998 totalled 1,200 tonnes valued at $85 million.   The main species cultured were the spotted grouper (Epinephelus chlorostigma), goldlined seabream (Rhabdosargus sarba), mangrove snapper (Lutjanus argentimaculatus) and the pompano (Trachinotus blochii). 

 

In March and April 1998 widespread toxic red tide algal blooms caused fish kills at many of the FCZs in Hong Kong.  As a result the estimated production of marine fish culture in 1998 dropped to 1200 tonnes from 2960 tonnes in 1997.

 

5.4       Sensitive Receivers

 

Based on the preceding review of the available information on the baseline fisheries resources of the waters in the Study Area, the only identified sensitive receiver which may be affected by the proposed dredging cable laying operations has been identified asare Cheung Sha Wan FCZ although this has been shown to be outwith the area of influence and the recognised spawning and nursery ground where both sensitive receivers are not co-located.

 

New ex gratia arrangements for mariculturists affected by dredging or dumping projects were approved in July 1993.  If, at any one time, the suspended solids concentration exceeds 50 mg L-1 or exceeds by 100% the highest level recorded at the fish culture zone during the five years before commencement of works, mariculturists are eligible for ex gratia allowance payments.  When such criteria are exceeded, appropriate mitigation measures, including stopping work if necessary, should be adopted to keep the impact within acceptable levels.  Should ex gratia payments be triggered the eligible mariculturists may then opt to:

 

·continue mariculture in the same place at their own risk, in which case they would be eligible for an ex gratia allowance equivalent to 50 % of the normal two-year fish culture cycle; or,

·suspend mariculture operations for two years, in which case they would be eligible for an ex gratia equivalent to the notional loss of income for a normal two-year fish cycle; or

·cease mariculture operations permanently, in which case they would receive the existing ex gratia allowance payable for extinguishment, which contains elements for the notional loss of income for two years and the loss of capital investment in rafts and cages.

 

5.5       Potential Impacts from Construction and Operation 

 

5.5.1     Construction Impacts

 

Direct Impacts

 

Direct impacts to fisheries resources and fishing operations include minor habitat loss and temporary loss of a seabed area, which supports fisheries resources due to the reclamation temporary working platform and dredging associated with the proposed project. Only 0.018 hectares of the Pui O Fishing Zone (<1%) associated with the small portion of reclamation at Pui O Wan will lead to minor habitat loss. The direct impact is likely to be negligible and therefore will not be further discussed in this Fisheries Impact Assessment.In Section 6.4.4, the temporary working platform at Pui O will result in the temporary loss of 180m2 of intertidal sandy shore. However, this shoreline will be reinstated after completion of the tunnel excavation and thus the shoreline can be recolonised. The sandy shore survey conducted at the proposed portal site indicate that the habitat supports assemblages that are of low diversity and abundance and is considered to be of low ecological value. As the area to be directly affected by the temporary working platform is of low ecological value and is small in size (180m2), the impact is considered as acceptable.

 

 

Temporary losses in seabed area which supports fisheries resource due to dredging only constitute a loss of 1% of the Tai Long Wan Fishing Zone and 0.3% of the Cheung Chau Fishing Zone.Temporary losses in seabed area which supports fisheries resource due to dredging only constitute a loss of 1% of the Tai Long Wan Fishing Zone and 0.3% of the Cheung Chau Fishing Zone. Although Tai Long Wan and Cheung Chau are of medium-high ranking, the small dredged area of 13.04 hectares at the Adamasta Channel (<1% of the total area of 3844.29 ha and a production value of HK$ 58,345) is predicted to exert minimal impact to the Hong Kong fishing industry.With reference to the level of fishing activity already stated in section 5.3.2, few fishermen are likely to be heavily dependent on the area, in which the loss in fisheries production is expected to be insignificant and short term. Estimation of the affected dredged area is based on the worst case scenario for the construction method by dredging instead of direct burying with 0.3m trench width.Short-term direct disturbance of the seabed is predicted to occur only within the dredging area during dredging operation. The expected duration of cable laying by dredging operationand direct burying is  a total of about108 and 13 weeks (Refer to Figure 2.4 Outline Construction Program)respectively but this is subject to the construction method and cable material being used. In perspective of the environmental, direct burying is undoubtedly a favoured construction method for cable laying.  Upon completion of dredging operations it is expected that the seabed fauna will recolonise and the affected area will be resumed to support fisheries resources.

 

The submarine cables will be covered by concrete slabs of approximate dimensions 2m(W)x3m(L)x0.3m(D) as protection against maintenance dredging. They will be placed on the seabed by barge and crane or diver. The concrete slabs will gradually be affected by natural sedimentation patterns in the area and covered, thereby re-establishing the base stratum. It takes about 3 months to complete the installation of protective concrete slabs.

 

Indirect Impacts

 

Indirect impacts to fisheries resources during construction include sediment release associated with dredging works.  Potential impacts to water quality from sediment release are as follows:

 

·       increased concentrations of suspended solids (SS);

·       a resulting decrease in dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations; and

·       an increase in nutrient concentrations in the water column.

 


Suspended sediment fluxes occur naturally in the marine environment.  Consequently, fish have evolved behavioural adaptations to tolerate increased SS loads.  These include clearing their gills by flushing water over them.  When SS levels become excessive fish can move to clearer waters.  Susceptibility generally decreases with age, with eggs the most vulnerable and adults the least sensitive to effects from sediments.  The rate, season and duration of SS elevations will influence the type and extent of impact upon fish.

 

Based on the results contained in “EPD Marine Water Quality for 1999”, the sediment sampled at SS5 monitoring station closest to the proposed submarine cable across the Adamasta Channel  were found to be uncontaminated (refer to Table 5-3).  Therefore, the release of contaminants from sediments into the receiving waters will not be of concern. As SS release due to the construction works will be minimal, impacts derived from elevations of SS and nutrients and DO depletion are likely to be negligible and therefore acceptable to fisheries resources in the Study Area.

 

Table 5-3  Summary of Sediment Quality Monitoring Results for SS5 in 1999

 

demonstrated that the level of further testing (if any) which needs to be carried out before disposal. Since only if dredging is undertaken will disposal of marine deposits be required. The direct burying method does not generate waste for off-site disposal which is another reason why it is a favoured construction method.

 

Note:    Data presented are in annual medians of monthly samples

Bolded value indicates non-compliance with the LCEL.

(Source: Adopted from EPD Marine Water Quality for 1999)

 


Potential Impacts to Cheung Sha Wan Fish Culture Zone and the Spawning and Nursery Ground in Adamasta Channele

 

The Cheung Sha Wan Fish Culture Zone 5km away in areas where is farther away from the cable laying site and full complicance with the WQO’s is predicted for direct burying. For dredging some exceedances occur and mitigation measures are required to achieve compliance as indicated in Section 4. Water quality modelling (see Section 4) has indicated that in the range between 0.0 and 0.7 less than 1increase in SS at the Cheung Sha Wan Fish Culture Zone will not exceed the Water Quality Objectives. As predicted elevation in SS, and consequently depletions in DO and increase in nutrients and contaminants, are very low in areas farther away from the dredging area, the Cheung Sha Wan Fish Culture Zone 5km away and other fisheries resources within the Study Area are not predicted to be affected.The submarine cable route passes through the fast flowing Adamasta Channel which is part of the overall spawning and nursery ground. The impacts associated with cable laying by the preferred method direct burying will be short in duration (13 weeks maximum). Though general WQO set by EPD are not set specifically protect spawning and nursery function, when SS levels become excessive, fish often move to less affected areas. It is also noted that the sediments in the area are not generally highly polluted and coupled with a relatively low sediment release, it is expected that DO depletion would be negligible and a very transient, short term impact as stated in Section 4.5.2.

 

For the direct burying, no specific mitigation measures are required other than due care during the works as there is full compliance with the WQO’s implement the measures given in Section 4 for protection of water quality to also safeguard fishery resources. Mitigation measures such as using closed grab and silt curtain (details refer to section 2.5 of R Recommended Pollution Control Clauses for Construction Contract and Section 4 of this  Report) would reduce SS loss to the water column during dredging operations.  However, as SS released due to the construction works is predicted to be minimalrelatively small and of short duration and in particular, the need to implement such mitigation measures will be determined during the Detailed Design stage.In order to minimise the potential impacts on the recognised spawning and nursery grounds at Adamasta Channel, it is recommended to implement the aforesaid mitigation measures.

 

 

5.5.2     Operational Impacts

 

During the operation of the submarine cable across the Adamasta Channel, no impacts to fisheries resources and fishing operations are predicted to occur as the proposed cable will be buried 3m below the seabed.

 


 

5.6       Evaluation of Impacts

 

The severity of impact on fisheries associated with the construction works is considered low.  An evaluation of the impact in accordance with the TMEIA Annex 9 is presented as follows:

 

·       Nature of Impact: Short-term impacts to the fisheries resources within the dredging area and its immediate vicinity are perceived. It is worth noting that dredging will take a longer time than direct burying and thus create a greater interference with fishing activity and also possibly with the utility of the area as a spawning and nursery ground. The duration of predicted impacts on resources for dredging, direct burying and laying the protective capping is 108 weeks, 13 weeks and 12 weeks respectively. Direct burying would lead to greater short-term water quality perturbations but over a much shorter period. As a result of minor perturbations to water quality in the Study Area, short-term impacts to the fisheries resources are predicted to occur. Upon completion of dredging operation it is expected that the seabed fauna will recolonise and the affected area will be resumed to its original role of supporting fisheries resources.

·       Size of Affected Area: 180m2 temporary loss on intertidal sandy shore habitats with low ecological value due to temporary working platform at Pui O is anticipated. Pui O is considered as low ranking to the Hong Kong fishing industry. The small reclaimed area will only cover 0.018 hectares which constitutes less than 1% of the total area (596.51ha). The estimated temporarily affected area by dredging which covers approximately 13.04 ha which covers approximately 13.04 hectares is confined mainly to the dredging area at the Adamasta Channel and its immediate vicinity whereas by direct burying covers about 0.621ha affected area whereas direct burying. A temporary loss of a seabed area which supports fisheries resources will occur due to dredging. The benthnic community within the dredging area will be disturbed during dredging operation but is expected to recolonise once the proposed works are completed.

·       Size of fisheries resources/production: Potential Directly impacted areas at Tai Long Wan and Cheung Chau are both ranked medium-high in comparison to other areas in Hong Kong in terms of catch weight and value. With reference to the level of fishing activity already stated in section 5.3.2, few fishermen are likely to be heavily dependent on the area, in which the loss in fisheries production is expected to be insignificant and short term.  Indirectly impacted areas in the Study Area are ranked from low to medium-high to the Hong Kong fishing industry.  However, as the construction impacts are predicted to be transient and localised, their influence on fisheries resources/production should be minimal and therefore insignificant.

·       Destruction and disturbance of nursery and spawning grounds: The closest nursery and spawning grounds are located at Cheung Chau and South Lantau and in the south Cheung ChauAdamasta Channel. The submarine cable route passes through the fast flowing Adamasta Channel which is part of the overall spawning and nursery ground. The impacts associated with cable laying by the preferred method direct burying will be short in duration (13 weeks maximum). Though general WQO set by EPD are not set specifically protect spawning and nursery function, when SS levels become excessive, fish often move to less affected areas. It is also noted that the sediments in the area are not generally highly polluted and coupled with a relatively low sediment release, it is expected that DO depletion would be negligible and a very transient, short term impact as stated in Section 4.5.2. Hence, the potential impact on the spawning and nursery ground is anticipated to be insignificant. in the range between 0.0 and 0.7 less than 1be edIf compliance with the Water Quality Objectives is achieved at this area, the potential impacts through SS elevations and DO depletion are expected to be negligible.

·       Impact on Fishing Activity:  Based on the existing limited fishing activity, due to busy marine traffic in the Study Areaaforementioned information stated in section 5.3.2 on fishing activity and few fishermen are likely to be heavily dependent on the area, the impact on fishing activity is expected to be negligible. The reduced duration of the disturbance using direct burying (13 weeks) maximum) compared to dredging (108 weeks), is one of the key reasons why direct burying is a favoured construction method.

·       Impact on Aquaculture Activity: As SS elevations and DO depletions are predicted to be in compliance with the Water Quality Objective at the Cheung Sha Wan FCZ, impacts to this sensitive receiver are expected to be negligible.

 

 


 

5.7      


Mitigation Measures

 

The Contractors should take all necessary steps to avoid impacts to water quality during the cable laying in order to prevent any potential impacts to fisheries resources and fishing operations. It is considered that the protection measures recommended in Section 4.8.16 to control impacts to water quality to within acceptable levels, are also expect to control impacts to fisheries resources as well as fishing operationsand fish culture operations. Impacts on fishing operations can be reduced by confining the construction area in the radius of 50m from the laying barge and burying machine from Marine Department. Thus, no specific mitigation measures for fisheries resources are required during construction of the cable.Since works will take place in a recognised spawning and nursery grounds at Adamasta Channel, consideration should be taken by the Contractors to protect life stages such as eggs and larvae of commercial resources that stated in section 5.5.1. Appropriate mitigation measures are recommended in the event that dredging in the option selected.

 

5.8       Environmental Monitoring & Audit

 

The monitoring and audit activities, designed to detect and mitigate any unacceptable impacts on water quality and marine ecology, will also serve to protect against unacceptable impacts on fisheries resources.  The EM&A programme will provide management actions and supplemental mitigation measures to be employed should impacts arise, thereby ensuring the environmental acceptability of the project.  As insignificant impacts to the fisheriesry are expected to occur after implementation of the proposed mitigation measures no specific , the development and implementation of a monitoring and audit programme specifically designed to assess the effects on commercial fisheries resources is not necessaryhas been recommended.

 

 


5.9       Conclusions

 

A review of existing information indicates that the Study Area supports fisheries resources and fishing operations.  As impacts resulting from the project will be confined to dredging and reclamation, no adverse impacts to fisheries resources are expected. Impacts from the project will be confined to reclamatiothe temporary working flatformn and the chosen method of cable laying/protection which may be either by dredging or direct burial. The size of impact due to dredging and reclamation temporary work areas at Pui O is predicted to minor. The potential impact on the spawning and nursery ground is anticipated to be insignificant. Generally the mitigation measures which are recommended to control water quality impacts to within acceptable levels, are also expected to control impacts to fisheries resources. Therefore, no fisheries-specific mitigation measures are required.In addition to which, appropriate mitigation measures are proposed such as adoption of direct burying as the preferred cable laying method and using shield over the face of the cutter to suppress the release and dispersion of sediments to the water column.

 

Direct Impacts

 

Direct impacts to fishing operations and resources will occur through minor habitat loss and temporary loss of a seabed area (approximately 13.04 hectares) which supports fisheries resources due to dredging between / small-scale reclamation works at Tai Long Wan, and Cheung Chau. and Pui O. 0.055ha permanent loss on The intertidal sandy shore habitats with low ecological value due to proposed reclamation works at temporary working platform Pui O is anticipatedwill be temporarily displaced but could recoglonise following re-installmentre-instatement of the shoreline after completion of the tunnel excavation. The direct impact lead to minor habitat loss due to a small scale of reclamation at Pui O Wan is likely to be negligible. The expected maximum duration expected for cable laying by dredging and direct burying is 108 and 13 weeks respectively. From an environmental perspective, direct burying is undoubtedly a favoured cable laying method. As direct impacts are predicted to occur only within the Construction Area during constructionand few fishermen are likely to be heavily dependent on the area, the loss in fisheries production is expected to be insignificant and short term..

 

Indirect Impacts

 

Indirect impacts during the construction phase include an increase in suspended sediment concentrations and decrease in dissolved oxygen in the water column.  SS fluxes occur naturally in the marine environment, consequently fish have evolved behavioural adaptations to tolerate increased SS loads.  These include clearing their gills by flushing water over them.  When SS levels become excessive fish can move to clearer waters.  Susceptibility generally decreases with age, with eggs the most vulnerable and adults the least sensitive to effects from sediments.  The rate, season and duration of SS elevations will influence the type and extent of impact upon fish.   SS levels predicted by water quality modelling shows that WQO will be met in most situations and therefore there would only be transient and localised impact on fisheries resources, including the spawning and nursery grounds of Cheung Chaua and South Lantau and in Adamasta Channel and the Cheung Sha Wan FCZ. However, these indirect impacts are anticipated to be localized and transient.  In addition, any constraints measures on construction operations recommended to reduce impacts to water quality and marine ecology to acceptable levels are expected to also mitigate for effects on fisheries resources. Therefore, no special mitigation measures are recommended for the fisheries sensitive receivers.  Those mitigation measures on marine ecology, which are related to the protection of fisheries resources, are summarised in the Implementation Schedule.



1AFCD (1998) Annual Department Report 1998-1999

2ERM (1998) op cit