6 LAND CONTAMINATION

6.1 Introduction

6.1.1 The EIA report identified several potential sites of land contamination and recommended that further investigation was required to address the land contamination impact while the concerned land was available to DBL after land resumption. The land contamination work shall follow the guidelines as stated in "Guideiance Notes for Investigation and Remediation of Contaminated Sites of Petrol Filling Stations, Boatyards, and Car Repair/Dismantling Workshops" and the ProPECC PN3/94 Contaminated Land Assessment and Remediation. The scope of work is outlined in this chapter.

6.2 Review Potential Contaminated Sites Identified in the EIA

6.2.1 The potential contamination sites along the DBL alignment as identified in the EIA are presented in Figure 6.1, and the details are summarized in Table 6.1. The ET shall carry out supplementary site apprasials for the following sites with reference to the findings of the EIA:

(i) Area C1 near proposed helipad
(ii) Area C3 near propose road to helipad
(iii) Area D near Ha Tsuen Interchange
(iv) Area F under the alignment of DBL south to San Wai Sewage Treatment Works
(v) Area G under the alignment of DBL south to San Wai Sewage Treatment Work
(vi) Area J under the alignment of DBL along Fuk Hang Tsuen Road
(vii) Area L at Lam Tei Interchange
(viii) Area M at Lam Tei Interchange
(ix) Area K at Lam Tei Intechange
(x) Area B near the proposed helipad

6.3 Preparation of the Contamination Assessment Plan

6.3.1 The ET shall base on the findings of EIA and the supplementary site apprasials to prepare Contamination Assessment Plans (CAPs) before the construction stage (probably immediately after the land is made available to DBL).

6.3.2 Table 6.1 lists the parameters that should be analysed, and the number of samples to be taken at each identified area (according to EPD's Guidance Notes for Investigation and Remediation of Contaminated Sites) for reference. All the information given in Table 6.1 (including the number and location of sampling points and testing parameters) should be reviewed during the preparation of Contamination Asessment Plan.

6.3.3 The Contamination Assessment Plan (CAP) shall be prepared and submitted to EPD for endorsement prior to conducting the site investigation. A Contamination Assessment Report (CAR) shall be prepared based on results obtained from site investigation and submitted to EPD.

6.3.4 Upon receipt of the EPD's approval, the CAP will be implemented and the findings of the investigations will be reported in the Contamination Assessment Report (CAR).

6.3.5 The results of the sampling exercise would determine whether contaminated land is, in fact, an issue that needs to be addressed further. If results from sample analysis indicate the presence of potential contaminants, then it may be necessary to update or amend the current CAP in light of the findings. If land contamination is confirmed, a Remediation Assessment Plan (RAP) shall be prepared, and both the CAR and the RAP shall be submitted as a combined report to the EPD for approval prior to the implementation of any remedial technology. If applicable and required in consultation with the EPD, the contaminated site shall be remediated in accordance with the approved CAR/RAP.

6.3.6 Implementation of the RAP can begin once the CAR and RAP submission are approved by the EPD. The essential steps involved in remedial programme are detailed in the EPD's Guidance Notes document. In all cases, contaminated soil remediation, treatment or disposal of it must be managed in an environmentally sound manner, including compliance with all relevant legislation and Government requirements.

6.4 Programme for Land Contamination Investigation

6.4.1 The CAP together with the sampling and testing work shall be planned to start after the land is available to DBL through early negotiations or resumption and the subsequent CAR and RAP shall be approved by the EPD before commencement of any construction work which may disturb the ground of the concerned sites. Contaminated soil should be remediated before construction work could be started on the concerned sites.

Table 6.1 Summary of the Land Contamination Investigation Works

Site

Site Description & Current Land Use

Approx.

Site Size (m2)

Further Action by ET

Indicative CAP to be reviewed by ET

Tentative

No. of Samples

(full-scale / simplified*)

Parameters to be Measured

B

unknown site

This was a workshop site of unknown activities. The site being fenced off with metal plates, making it unavailable for visual inspection.

The site was seen on aerial photos of 1997, 1998 & 1999. It cannot be identified on previous APs and therefore it is assumed that its current land use began in 1997.

400

Site appraisal to review when the site is available to DBL

to be determined after site appraisal if necessary

to be determined after site appraisal if necessary

C1

Possible illegal dump site

Wastes such as used car tires, cans, drums and other unknown materials were found on this site. These may be unauthorized dumping of wastes.

Ground surface with signs of open burning recently (blackened soils).

Discoloration of soil (usually dark color) was observed in localised areas.

800

Further site appraisal to review the findings of EIA and prepare a CAP and a CAR, if necessary a RAP.

 

1-3 at suspected locations for screening of contaminants

TPH, BTEX, lead, chromium, copper, zinc, PAHs, PCBs, organic solvents

C3

unknown site

The site was an open storage area. Much of the area was vacant at the time of visit. Several drums were observed and might be related to chemicals.

500

Site appraisal to review when the site is available to DBL

to be determined after site appraisal if necessary

to be determined after site appraisal if necessary

D

(area within DBL land resumption limit only)

The site was of mixed usage involving open storage area for construction materials, equipment, heavy machinery, chemicals, wastes, and as open workshop for car repairs and dismantle. Discoloration of ground surface was observed at some localized areas.

It was seen on APs of 1997, 1998 & 1999. It cannot be identified on previous APs and therefore it is assumed that its current land use began in 1997.

800

Further site appraisal to review the findings of EIA and prepare a CAP and a CAR, if necessary a RAP.

1 / 3

TPH, BTEX, lead, chromium, copper, zinc, PAHs, organic solvents

F

Car repair/

dismantling

The site was deal with car repairing / dismantling with residential use nearby.

It is seen during site visitation and on APs of 1999, but too small to be identified on APs of previous years.

1800

Further site appraisal to review the findings of EIA and prepare a CAP and a CAR, if necessary a RAP.

8 / 4

TPH, BTEX, lead, chromium, copper, zinc, PAHs, organic solvents

G

Plastic work-shop

The site was a workshop. Some bags of High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) was observed. There was a chimney on-site, and the site is suspected to be a plastic foam workshop.

The site is seen during site visitation and on AP of 1999, but too small to be identified on APs of previous years

2900

Further site appraisal to review the findings of EIA and prepare a CAP and a CAR, if necessary a RAP.

8 / 4

BTEX, TPH, PAH, organic solvents

J

Car repair/

dismantling

The site was comprised of several workshops, including car repairing, hardware and others.

It is seen on aerial photos since 1973, but unable to identify their usage and the change in land use over time.

4800

Further site appraisal to review the findings of EIA and prepare a CAP and a CAR, if necessary a RAP.

8 / 4

TPH, BTEX, lead, chromium, copper, zinc, PAHs, organic solvents

K

unknown site

This was a workshop site. It was relatively enclosed and it was not able to inspect visually from the outside

It was seen on aerial photos since 1973, but unable to identify their usage and the change in land use over time.

400

Site appraisal to review when the site is available to DBL

to be determined after site appraisal if necessary

to be determined after site appraisal if necessary

L

Car repair/

dismantling

The site was a car repairing / dismantling site. Discoloration of ground surface was observed in some areas. Quite a big active site with potential land contamination impacts.

It was seen on APs since 1973, but unable to identify their usage and there may be a change in land use over time.

1000

Further site appraisal to review the findings of EIA and prepare a CAP and a CAR, if necessary a RAP.

8 / 4

TPH, BTEX, lead, chromium, copper, zinc, PAHs, organic solvents

M

Car repair/

dismantling

The site was for car repairing / dismantling. It was active at the time of visit. Discoloration of ground surface was observed.

It was seen on APs since 1973, but unable to identify their usage and there may be changes in land use over time due to the small scales of the APs.

.

450

Further site appraisal to review the findings of EIA and prepare a CAP and a CAR, if necessary a RAP.

4 / 3

TPH, BTEX, lead, chromium, copper, zinc, PAHs, organic solvents

Notes:

* subject to agreement with EPD

** since the concerned activities may change with time, the location of sampling should be referenced toprevailing conditions and to be agreed with EPD

criteria for adopting a simplified or full-scale investigation should be carried out area based on those listed in EPD’s Guidance Notes for Investigation and Remediation of Contaminated Sites

TPH : Total petroleum hydrocarbons

BTEX : Benzene, toluene, ethlybenzene, xylene

PAH : Polyaromatic hydrocarbons

Sampling and Testing methods should follow those specified in the Guidance Notes.

6.5 Mitigation Measures During Construction Phase

6.5.1 As a precaution, it is recommended that standard good practice shall be implemented during the construction phase to minimise any potential exposure to contaminated soils or groundwater. These measures include:

6.5.2 In accordance with good construction practice, silt traps should be used to reduce the impact to drainage caused by suspended solids arising from disturbed ground, or any construction materials such as cement and gravel. Groundwater should be disposed of in accordance with the WPCO.