8.1
This chapter assesses the
impacts of the projectProject upon terrestrial ecology, intertidal
ecology and subtidal ecology.
8.2
The Outlying Islands Sewage
Scheme Stage 1 Phase II Package J consists of the provision of a sewer system
for the Sok Kwu Wan area of Lamma Island as well as sewage treatment and
disposal facilities . The sewer system includes pumping
stations and gravity sewers/rising mains to collect and transfer the sewage and
wastewater arising from the Sok Kwu Wan catchment areas to the
proposed sewage treatment and disposal facilities. The proposed sewage treatment and disposal
facilities include a rising main from the proposed sewage treatment works to a
submarine effluent outfall offshore.
8.3
Ecological baseline surveys including a dive survey were
conducted from autumn 1998 to summer 1999. A verification survey was conducted
in April 2002 to update and verify the ecological data collected. A coral
mapping survey was also performed in May 2002. A detailed assessment of
ecological impacts of the project Project was made based on the baseline conditions. Efforts were made in the planning of the pProject to avoid ecological impacts as much as possible. Mitigation measures
were developed as necessary to minimize or reduce negative impacts to
acceptable levels.
8.4
The following Hong Kong SAR Government
legislation and guidelines are relevant to the assessment of impacts to
ecology:
·
Forests and Countryside Ordinance
(Cap. 96);
·
Forestry Regulations (Cap. 96,
subsidiary legislation);
·
Country Parks Ordinance (Cap. 208) and
associated subsidiary legislation;
·
Marine Parks Ordinance (Cap. 476) and
associated subsidiary legislation;
·
Town Planning Ordinance (Cap. 131);
·
Wild Animals Protection Ordinance
(Cap. 170);
·
Animals and Plants (Protection of
Endangered Species) Ordinance (Cap. 187);
·
Environmental Impact Assessment
Ordinance (Cap. 499) and associated Technical Memorandum on Environmental
Impact Assessment Process (the "TM"); and
·
"Guidelines for Implementing the
Policy on Off-site Ecological Mitigation Measures" (PELB Technical
Circular 1/97, Works Branch Technical Circular 4/97, dated 17 February 1997)
(the "TC").
8.5
This study also takes note of
the following relevant international agreements:
·
Convention on Wetlands of
International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat ("Ramsar
Convention");
·
Convention on the Conservation of
Migratory Species of Wild Animals ("Bonn Convention");
·
Convention on International Trade in
Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora ("CITES"); and
·
Convention on Biological Diversity.
Recognised Sites
of Conservation Importance
8.6
The following recognised sites of
conservation importance interest are
located at or near the study area and are shown in Figure 8.1:
Potential Country Park: the South
Lamma Country Park, south of Lo So Shing and excluding es villages and
residential areas, is one of the fourteen country parks proposed in the Territorial estrial Development
Strategy Review (Planning Department 1995).
A study is underway by AFCD to establish the
desirability and feasibility of establishing a country park here.
The waters to the west of Ha Mei Wan
were identified in the Territorial Development Strategy Review as a
‘Significant Area’ for Marine Conservation (PELB 1998), as were the waters of
the northern part of Tung O Bay.
Identified as an ‘Unique Area’ for
Marine Conservation (PELB 1998), the coastal waters of south Lamma are also a potential proposed Marine
Park. The potential proposed South
Lamma Marine Park would cover the waters south of Lo So Shing Beach, along the
coastline of south Lamma, including Sham Wan, to the north boundary of Shek Pai
Wan. Both hard and soft gorgonian corals are known to occur
here (Planning Department 1993). This proposed Marine Park is the subject of a
recently finished feasibility study for Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation
Department (AFCD). It lies
over 2.5 km from the study area at its closest point.
SSSI in Sham Wan: an area of 4
hectares including the sandy beach and the adjacent shallow shore in Sham Wan
was designated as an SSSI on 3 June 1999. This area has been identified as
important for Green Turtle Chelonia mydas nesting (Morton 1998).
Restricted Area for green turtles in
Sham Wan: The sandy beach of Sham Wan
was designated on 30 July 1999 as a Restricted Area under the Wild Animals
Protection Ordinance (Cap. 170), and is restricted for entry from 1 June to 31
October each year to protect breeding Green Turtles.
South Lamma Island: south Lamma Island
was designated as a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) in 1980. The objective was to protect the nesting
habitats of White-bellied Sea Eagle Haliaeetus
leucogaster and Bonelli’s Eagle Hieraaetus
fasciatus near Mount Stenhouse.
8.7
No other designated, proposed or
recognised sites of conservation importance interest lie
within 5 km of the study area.
Literature Review
8.8
A literature review was conducted to provide information on determine existing
conditions in the study area and Lamma Island, and to identify habitats and
species of potential importance that may be affected by the projectProject. Literature review included Government and
private sector reports, independent and Government published literature and
academic studies. Literature review
included the following :
·
Fill Management Study (Phase
11). Investigation and Development of
Marine Borrow Areas. East Lamma Channel
Borrow Area. (Binnie 1993). Coastal seabed profiling and coral transect surveys
were conducted at sites nearby to Package J in the East Lamma Channel;
·
Marine Ecology of Hong Kong: Report on Underwater Dive Surveys (October
1991 - November 1994) (Binnie 1995). Dive surveys at 86 sites in central and
eastern Hong Kong waters;
·
EIA for Outlying Islands Sewerage
Stage 1 Phase 1 (Maunsell 1997);
·
Hong Kong Bird Reports (1992-1998);
·
Porcupine! Numbers 1 - 27 (Newsletter of Department of Ecology &
Biodiversity, University of Hong Kong);
·
Hong Kong Amphibians and Reptiles
(Karsen et al. 1998);
·
WWF's 1:50000 Hong Kong Vegetation Map
(Ashworth et al. 1993);
·
Aerial photos (CN20772-4 taken in
1998, CN18882-5 taken in 1997) from the Hong Kong Government Map Office;
·
Avifauna of Hong Kong (Carey et al. 2001); and
·
Memoirs of Hong Kong Natural History
Society.
8.9
Results of the literature review
are discussed in Section 8.3 “Description of the Environment”.
Field Survey
8.10
Literature review was supplemented by
field surveys. Field surveys were
designed to fill data gaps which would prevent an adequate assessment of the
project's impacts upon terrestrial, intertidal and subtidal ecology, and the
development of appropriate mitigation measures. Four-season ecological surveys,
including terrestrial flora survey, terrestrial fauna survey, avifauna survey,
intertidal survey and dive survey, conducted between September 1998 to July
1999. A verification survey was conducted in April 2002 to update and verify
the ecological data collected, and a coral mapping survey was performed in May
2002.
8.11
Sok Kwu Wan is a deep, rectangular
embayment on the eastern coast of Lamma Island, lying southwest to northeast
with its opening on the east side. The study area for ecology, based on the
sewer alignment and the TM guideline setting the study area boundary 500m from
the project boundary, was located south and east of Sok Kwu Wan including the
shore line and the subtidal zone.
Field Survey
MethodologyField Survey Methodology
Habitats and Vegetation
8.12
Qualitative fField surveys were
performed on 22 September and 7 December 1998, and 19 March and 29 June 1999 to
describe habitats and record plant species within the study area. Relative abundance of recorded plant species
(common, occasional or rare) was also assessed. Sizes of each habitat type were estimated by manual grid count
method. A verification survey was
conducted in on 30 April
2002 to update habitats and species list.
Efforts were made to find species protected under local regulations or
known to be uncommon or rare on a regional or territorial basis. In this report, the conservation status of
other plant taxa follows Xing et al.
2000. .
8.13
A 1:5000 scale habitat map of the
study area was produced based on 1997/8 Government aerial photographs, 1993 WWF's
vegetation map and ground truthing.
8.14
Colour photographs were taken of all
terrestrial habitat types surveyed and other features or species of
conservation importance.
Stream and Aquatic Fauna
8.15
A main stream to the east of Ling Kok Shan
flowed into the south of Sok Kwu Wan, a further incision of the embayment. The
outlet portion had been channelled. Several smaller streams joined it in the outlet
portion.
8.16
Surveys of aquatic fauna were
conducted in the streams
by active searching in March and June 1999. Fauna observed were identified to
the lowest practicable taxon and recorded.
Birds
8.17
The bird communities of the
terrestrial and coastal habitats in the study area were surveyed using the
transect count method. . Birds seen or heard within 25 m
from the transect (1.75 km) (Fig. 8.2) were identified to species and
counted
(Fig. 8.2). Nomenclature followed Viney et al. (1996). Surveys Counts were
carried out on 22 September (autumn survey), 7 December 1998 (winter survey),
19 March (spring survey) and 10 June 1999 (summer survey). Bird abundance was estimated as “birds ha-1”.
Nomenclature, Ccommonness and distribution of bird species
in Hong Kong follows Viney et al.
(1996), rarity and protection status of birds follows Zheng and Wang
(1998). Results of birds in rocky shore
habitats are reported in section “Inter-tidal
Ecology” (Section 8.68705).
Mammals, Reptiles, and Amphibians
8.18
Mammals, reptiles and amphibians in
the study area were surveyed by active searching on 22 September (autumn
survey), 7 December 1998 (winter survey), 19 March (spring survey) and 10 June
1999 (summer survey). Nomenclature for
reptiles and amphibians follows Karsen et al. (1998), that for amphibians
follows Lau and Dudgeon (1999), and that
for mammals
follows and Wilson and
Reeder (1992).
Invertebrates
8.19
Dragonflies and butterflies of the
study area were surveyed by active searching on 22 September (autumn survey), 7
December 1998 (winter survey), 19 March (spring survey) and 10 June 1999
(summer survey). Nomenclature for dragonflies
follows Wilson (1997) while that for butterflies follows Walthew (1997).
Results
8.20
The study area consists of natural
coastline east from Sok Kwu Wan Village to Mo Tat Wan, a stream outlet to the
western part of the bay and a vegetated coastal zone. Small disused quarries were also found to the east of the
village.
8.21
Areas adjacent to the study area have suffered from environmental
degradation due to noise and air pollution originating from Far East Cement
quarry works, and marine pollution from the Fish Culture Zone. Other areas of degradation include the
upland slopes east of Chung Mei Village which have been burnt as a result of
graveside clearing.
Terrestrial Habitats
and Vegetation
8.22
Terrestrial habitats within the study
area include woodland, shrubland-grassland, cultivation, fishponds,
disturbed/urbanised area and stream (Figure 8.2). The general environment and habitats had not little changed as observed during
the verification survey. The only
changes noticed were as the
completion of construction of the Refuse Transfer Station at Sok Kwu Wan, and
on-going construction at the coastal habitat of Lo So Shing. A total of 214 plant species were recorded
(Appendix 8.1), about 20% of which are exotic species. No species protected under local regulations
were recorded. Two uncommon tree
species, Celtis
biondii (Plate 8.9), Celtis timorensis (Plate 8.8), were recorded at the fringe of
the woodland habitats along the hillside (Figure 8.2). These trees were
described as “rare” and “restricted” respectively by Xing et al. (2000), but with increased records in recent
years, they are therefore
ranked as “uncommon”. "Important (Terrestrial)
Habitats Where an Ecological Assessment Will Be Necessary" as listed in Note 2,
Appendix A, Annex 16 of to the
EIAO-TM, existing on and near the terrestrial part of the
study area, only
include woodland habitat over 1 ha.
Woodland
8.23
Woodland (a total of 5.1 ha) mainly
occurred at Mo Tat Wan and Lo So Shing on the east and west ends respectively
of the study area (Plate 8.1). 65 plant
species were recorded in this habitat.
It was composed of a mixture of native pioneer, plantation, and orchard
plant species which in some places formed a closed canopy woodland. Acacia confusa and Casuarina equisetifolia were the dominant plantation species found.
Native pioneer trees such as Ficus
superba, Sterculia lanceolata, Celtis
sinensis, Litsea glutinosa and
Mallotus paniculatus were established
within the plantation. Understorey was not well developed, and was
composed of a variety of common species including Ilex asprella, Psychotria rubra, Breynia fruticosa, and Gardenia jasminoides. The woodland habitat within the study
area is simple in structure and not mature.
The 2 tree species of conservation importanceinterest, Celtis biondii and Celtis timorensis were recorded in this habitat.
Shrubland-grassland mosaic
8.24
23.8 ha of the study area was
shrubland-grassland habitat, which occurs on most of the hillsides and along
the backshore (Plate 8.2). Overall 144 plant species were recorded here, most of
which are common and ruderal/pioneer species.
8.25
The hillsides within the study area
were fairly eroded, and were dominated by mosaics of grasses, shrubs, large
boulders, and bare earth. Pioneer
native trees including Macaranga tanarius,
Schefflera octophylla, Sterculia lanceolata, and Litsea glutinosa were commonly found along the footpath, while
grasses (Isachne globosa, Miscanthus
floridulus), shrubs (Rhodomyrtus
tomentosa, Breynia fruticosa, Psychotria rubra, Trema orientalis), herbs (Dianella ensifolia, Caryopteris incana)
and ferns (Dicranopteris linearis,
Lygodium japonicum) were found on uplands.
8.26
The coastal and backshore community whas poorly developed
probably due to the steep terrain (bare rocky cliff surface), historical
disturbance (construction of residential development, footpath, etc.) and
on-going construction (e.g. reclamation of part of the coastline for
construction of the Refuse Transfer Station).
Other than the footpath, the coastline from Ta Shui Wan to Mo Tat Wan
was fairly natural. The backshore
community whas poorly developed due to the steep
terrain. Only a few individuals of
species typical of the backshore community, including Hibiscus tiliaceus, Scaevola
sericea, and Pandanus sp. were
recorded. Other species recorded are
common upland vegetation such as
Sterculia lanceolata, Celtis sinensis, Bridelia tomentosa, Inula cappa,
Zanthoxylum nitidum, which extended to the shore at the gullies. A few native grasses (Miscanthus floridulus, Neyraudia reynaudiana) and exotic weeds (Mikania micrantha, Lantana camara) were
established on the sandy shore.
Cultivation
8.27
A few pockets of cultivated land (a
total of 1 ha) were found within the study area (Plate 8.3). 15 plant species were recorded here. Most of them were abandoned and grown with
weeds including Praxelis clematidea,
Conyza canadensis, and Mikania
mirantha. Remnant of crops (e.g. Colocasia esculenta) were also
found. A few Banana (Musa paradisiaca), Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas) and Sugar-apple (Annona squamosa) were seen in active
fields.
Fishpond
8.28
Only one fenced fish pond
was found within the study area at Sok Kwu Wan near village houses (Plate 8.5). This pond was small and abandoned. It still had open water while the pond bunds
were grown with grasses and weeds including Panicum
maximum and Micrantha micrantha. Due to the small size, proximity to
urbanised area, and low plant diversity, it is of little ecological values.
Disturbed/urbanised area
8.29
The urban park near the pier and in
the residential area constituted the disturbed/urbanised area (2.8 ha). A total of 34 plant species were recorded in
this habitat; most were
planted or exotic species. Other than the native tree Hibiscus tiliaceus, most plants were
exotic landscaping or orchard species.
Examples included
are
Acacia confusa, Ficus
elastica, Delonix regia, Psidium guajava and Dimocarpus longan.
Considering the urbanised nature of the site and the plant species
recorded in this habitat, this disturbed/urbanised area has little limited ecological
value.
Stream and Aquatic
Fauna
8.30
Freshwater streams in the study area
were found to have little water flow during surveys, even in summer (Plate
8.6). Some of the streams had been
channelled by local villagers.
8.31
The width of the streams varied from
0.5 m to about 1.5 m. The channelled portion was much wider, to the width of
about 20 m, so the flow was slow and shallow. The stream bed of the channelled
part was predominantly composed of coarse grained sand, probably as a result of
upland erosion.
8.32
Diversity and abundance of aquatic
fauna was limited. Abundant crabs Perisesarma
bidens were seen on the banks of the streams. Fiddler crab Uca arcuata were found in the exposed sandy bed of the stream with
their burrows. One individual of Varuna
litterata was seen in the water. All these crab species are common and widely
distributed in Hong Kong.
8.33
No aquatic species of rarity or
conservation interest were found.
Birds
8.34
A total of 50 bird species were
reported on Lamma Island between 1990 and 1997 by members of the Hong Kong Bird
Watching Society and local naturalists (Appendix 8.2). There were 14 rare/endangered species (Table
8.1).
8.35
Aleutian Tern Sterna aleutica was recorded in waters of West
Lamma Channel in 1997 (Hong Kong Bird Watching Society pers. comm.). This species is fairly common in autumn
though rare in spring in Hong Kong and it is primarily maritime (Carey et al. 2001).
Table 8.1 Bird species of special conservation importance significance on
Lamma Island (from literature review)
.
Species
|
Protection
Status*
|
Distribution
|
Rarity
|
Watercock
|
-
|
Low-lying
freshwater habitats
|
Rare passage
migrant
|
Woodcock
|
-
|
Woodland
edge, usually along streams
|
Rare winter
visitor
|
Black-eared
Kite
|
Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC and Appendix II of CITES
|
Found in many types of habitats
|
Common
resident
|
Crested
Goshawk
|
Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC and Appendix II of CITES
|
Usually found in wooded habitats
|
Rare
resident
|
Chinese
Goshawk
|
Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC and Appendix II of CITES
|
Usually in
marshes or lightly-wooded hillsides
|
Rare passage
migrant
|
White-bellied
Sea Eagle
|
Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC and Appendix II of CITES
|
Hong Kong’s coastal areas,
only recorded in Hong Kong and nowhere else in China
|
Uncommon/rare resident
|
Bonelli’s Eagle
|
Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC and Appendix II of CITES
|
Found in many types of habitats, but usually in
lightly-wooded hillsides
|
Rare
resident
|
Kestrel
|
Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC and Appendix II of CITES
|
Found in
many types of habitats
|
Common/uncommon winter visitor
|
Greater
Coucal
|
All birds are protected in Hong Kong, Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC
|
Found in
many types of habitats
|
Common resident
|
Lesser
Coucal
|
All birds are protected in Hong Kong, Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC
|
Found in
many types of habitats
|
Common resident
|
Hoopoe
|
-
|
Found in
many types of habitats
|
Rare winter
visitor
|
White’s
Thrush
|
-
|
Found in
many types of habitats
|
Uncommon/rare
winter visitor
|
Hwamei
|
Appendix II of CITES
|
Found in
shrubland habitats
|
Common
resident
|
Grey Bushchat
|
-
|
Shrub
covered hillsides and cultivated lands
|
Rare winter
visitor and passage migrant
|
* All birds are protected in
Hong Kong under Wild Animals Protection
Ordinance (Cap. 170).
8.36
A total of 210 birds of 31
species were recorded in terrestrial habitats at the study area during field
surveys between September 1998 and June 1999 (Appendix 8.3). Most species are
common and widespread in Hong Kong and are typical of disturbed area (e.g.,
Chinese Bulbul Pycnonotus sinensis,
Tree Sparrow Passer montanus). Mean bird abundance in the shrubland
grassland mosaic was 11.9 birds ha-1, and was slightly higher than
those from other shrubland in Hong Kong (4.7 – 7.4 birds ha-1)
(Leven 2000). Mean bird abundance in
the shrubland grassland mosaic was considered to be low to moderate. Six rare/endangered species were recorded in
terrestrial habitats during the surveys (Table 8.2).
Table 8.2 Bird species of special conservation importance importance recorded
at terrestrial habitats on the study area
Species
|
Protection
Status*
|
Distribution
|
Rarity
|
Black-eared
Kite
|
Class 2 Protected Animal of
PRC and Appendix II of CITES
|
Found in
many types of habitats
|
Common
resident
|
Crested
Goshawk
|
Class 2 Protected Animal of
PRC and Appendix II of CITES
|
Usually
found in wooded habitats
|
Rare
resident
|
Black-winged
Cuckoo-shrike
|
-
|
Found in many types of habitats
|
Rare winter visitor and passage migrant
|
Greater
Coucal
|
Class 2 Protected Animal of
PRC
|
Found in
shrubland habitats
|
Common
resident
|
Grey-streaked
Flycatcher
|
-
|
Found in
areas with some canopy cover
|
Uncommon/rare passage migrant
|
Hwamei
|
Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC
|
Found in
shrubland habitats
|
Common
resident
|
* All birds are protected in
Hong Kong under Wild
Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap. 170).
8.37
Four species showed signs of breeding
during the spring and summer surveys in 1999.
Nests of Barn Swallow Hirundo
rustica and Black-necked Starlings Sturnus
nigricollis were found in urbanised areas.
Spotted Doves Streptopelia
chinensis were observed mating and Magpie Robins Copsychus saularis were seen chasing intruders out of
territories. These species are all
common and widespread in Hong Kong (Viney et
al. 1996), and build their nests in terrestrial habitats (e.g., urbanised
areas, woodlands). A Black Drongo Dicrurus macrocercus nest was found on
tree near the Refuse Transfer Station at Sok Kwu Wan in April 2002. This species is common and widespread in
Hong Kong (ibid.).
8.38
Results of verification survey in
April 2002 were compared to those in March 1999. No new species was recorded.
There were only minor differences in both bird abundance and species
richness. In addition, there were
little changes in the terrestrial habitats (e.g., shrubland grassland mosaic)
in the study area.
Mammals, Reptiles, and
Amphibians
8.39
A mongoose, probably the Javan
Mongoose Herpestes javanicus, was
recorded in Hong Kong in north Lamma, near Yung
Shue Wan in 1996 (Anon 1996). This
species was first recorded in Hong Kong in 1990, and its recorded range has
expanded rapidly since thenthat time. Javan Mongoose, however, is recently
considered as an introduced species (Corlett 2001).
8.40
Roosts of Japanese Pipistrelle Pipistrellus abramus (near Lo So Shing),
Lesser Bent-winged Bat Miniopterus
pusillus (near Sok Kwu Wan) and Bi-coloured Round-leaf Bat Hipposideros pomona (west slope of Mount
Stenhouse) were recorded in Lamma Island (Ades 1999). All bats are protected in
Hong Kong under the Wild Animals Protection Ordinance. Japanese Pipistrelle is probably the
commonest bat in Hong Kong (ibid.). Lesser Bent-winged Bat is locally widespread
but generally present in small numbers (ibid.). Bi-coloured Round-leaf Bat usually roosts in
humid water catchment tunnels or flooded abandoned mines (ibid.).
8.41
Seven amphibian species have been
recorded in Sok Kwu Wan between November 1991 and December 1996 (Lau and
Dudgeon 1999). These were the Asian
Common Toad Bufo melanostictus,
Gunther’s Frog Rana guentheri, Paddy
Frog R. limnocharis, Romer’s Tree
Frog Philautus romeri, Brown Tree
Frog Polypedates megacephalus,
Asiatic Painted Frog Kaloula pulchra
and Ornate Pigmy Frog Microhyla ornata. All except Romer’s Tree Frog are common and
widespread in Hong Kong (Lau and Dudgeon 1999).
8.42
The first record of the Hong
Kong endemic Romer’s Tree Frog was from Lamma in 1952, and the species was
rediscovered there in 1984 (Karsen et al.
1998). It has been recorded near caves
and cultivated fields on the island, mostly near Sok Kwu Wan or south Lamma (ibid.).
The species also occurs on several other islands, including Lantau and
Po Toi (ibid.), and has then been introduced to
Hong Kong Island and the New Territories.
It is endemic to Hong Kong and is considered rare. Several conservation measures have been
undertaken to protect the species, including according it protected status
under the Wild Animals Protection Ordinance and implementing a reintroduction
programme.
8.43
Records of snakes from Lamma include
the Checkered Keelback Xenochrophis
piscator and Bamboo Snake Trimeresurus
albolabris, both seen near the beach to the east of the Hong Kong Electric
Power Station in the north of the island (Anon. 1997). Other snakes also recorded near Yung Shue
Wan included the Plumbeous Water Snake Enhydris plumbea and Taiwan Kukri Snake Oligodon formosanus (Anon. 1996). The Burmese Python Python molurus bivittatus was has been recorded
on Lamma Island (Karsen et al.
1998). This species is protected by law
in Hong Kong (ibid.), listed in
Appendix II of CITES and is a Class I protected species of the PRC (Zhao 1998).
8.44
Three-banded Box Terrapin Cuora trifasciata, a rather rare forest
stream species, iwas found on Lamma Island (Karsen et al. 1998). This species is only known from a few locations in Hong Kong (ibid.).
Three-banded Box Terrapin is a Class II protected species of the PRC and
is considered as “endangered” by IUCN (Zhao 1998). All terrapins are protected
in Hong Kong under the Wild Animals Protection Ordinance.
8.45
An unidentified sea turtle was
reported off the SE coast of Lamma Island on 7 May 1998 (Anon. 1998). Most local sightings of sea turtles are of
the Green Turtles Chelonia mydas. Green Turtle is considered as “endangered”
by IUCN, listed in Appendix I of CITES and is a Class II Protected Animal of
PRC (Zhao 1998). Green Turtle used to
nest regularly on Lamma Island, usually between July and August (Karsen et al. 1998). Sham Wan on southern Lamma is the only currently known nesting
site of Green Turtle in Hong Kong (Anon. 1998). Due to illegal collection of its eggs and also to deterioration
of the marine habitats, the local population of Green Turtles is seriously
under threat (Karsen et al.
1998). Local villagers indicated that
there had been were about
20-50 nestings in Sham Wan per season but the number has dropped deteriorated
over the last decade (McGilvray and Geermans 1997). There was only 1one turtle reported to
have laid eggs in 1996 and none in 1997 (ibid.)
but nesting was confirmed in 1998. The
beach at Hung Shing Ye on western Lamma was had been used by
nesting turtles until twenty years ago when increasing human inhabitation drove
nesting turtles away (Anon. 1998).
Another record of sea turtles was the shell of a Pacific Ridley Turtle Lepidochelys olivacea found washed
ashore on a beach in south-west Lamma Island (ibid.). All sea turtles are protected in Hong Kong under the Wild
Animals Protection Ordinance.
8.46
Reptile and amphibian species of
conservation importance reported in Lamma Island are summarised in Table
8.3.
Table 8.3 Summary
of reptile and amphibian species of conservation importance in Lamma Island (from literature review) survey
Species
|
Protection
Status*
|
Distribution
|
Rarity
|
Burmese
Python
|
Protected by
law in Hong Kong;
Class I
protected species of the PRC;
Appendix II of CITES
|
Widely
distributed in Hong Kong, found in a variety of habitats
|
Abundance in
China declining
|
Three-banded Box Terrapin
|
Protected by
law in Hong Kong;
Class II protected species of the PRC
|
Only known
from a few localities in Hong Kong,
Found in
hill and mountain streams in the vicinity of broad-leaf woodland or secondary
forest
|
Rare in Hong
Kong and China, due to over-exploitation
|
Green Turtle
|
Protected by
law in Hong Kong;
Class II
protected species of the PRC;
Appendix I
of CITES
|
Occurs in marine waters around Hong Kong except in
the west
|
Rare, under
threat due to illegal collection of eggs and deterioration of marine
environment
|
Romer’s Tree
Frog
|
Protected by law in Hong Kong
|
Lamma Island, Po Toi, Lantau Islands
|
Restricted, endemic
|
8.47
No amphibian or mammal was observed in
the study area during the field surveys between September 1998 and June
1999. Reeves’ Terrapins Chinemys reevesii and Red-eared Sliders Trachemys scripta were found in a small
pond near the estuary during the spring and summer surveys in 1999. Reeves’ Terrapin is primarily an inhabitant
of ponds and rivers (Karsen et al.
1998). This species is once common
throughout its range, but now become rare due to over-exploitation as food and
medical uses (Zhao 1998). Red-eared
Slider is an introduced North American species (Karsen et al. 1998).
No changes which would have implication on herpetofauna diversity were observed
during the verification survey in April 2002.
8.48
No change which would cause big
difference in herpetofauna diversity was observed during the
verification survey in April 2002.Recently, in an ecological survey for a separated project within the study area of the
present proposed projectProject, calling of 6 male Romer’s Tree Frogs was reported in a small moist area of shrubland/grassland
habitat near the
Pumping Station P2 site (Halcrow China Limited 2002) (see Figure 8.8). Assessment of potential impacts on this species is
provided in Section 8.1124 below.
Invertebrates
8.49
There was no previous record of
dragonflies at the study site. Two
dragonfly species were recorded at the site during the field surveys. These were Orthetrum sabina and Pantala
flavescens. Both are common and
widespread, and can be found in a wide range of habitats in Hong Kong (Wilson
1995, 1997). These two species were
observed again during
the verification survey in April 2002.
8.50
Twenty-one butterfly species were
reported (P. K. L. Lau, pers. comm.) in the shrubland/grassland mosaic habitats
at the study area between 1998 and 1999 (Table 8.4). This total included 6 rare and 10 uncommon species, including the
protected species Birdwing Troides helena.
8.51
Nineteen butterfly species were
recorded in the study area during field surveys (Table 8.5). All are common or very common in Hong Kong
(Walthew 1997).
8.52
Two more new butterfly
species were recorded in April 2002. These were the Tawny Rajah Charaxes
polyxena and Common Sailor Phaedyma
hylas,. and bBoth are common in Hong
Kong (Walthew 1997). The verification
survey in April 2002 revealed little change in the habitats of butterflies in
the study area between 1998 and 2002.
The two dragonfly species recorded in the study area in 1998, were also
recorded during the verification survey in April 2002.
Table 8.4 Additional butterfly species reported in
the study area between 1998 and 1999 (P. K. L. Lau, pers. comm.).
Common name
|
Latin name
|
Abundance
|
Striped Blue
Crow
|
Euploea mulciber
|
UC
|
Hong Kong Cupid
|
Everes lacturnus
|
C
|
Cornelian
|
Deudorix epijarbas
|
R
|
Long-banded
Silverline
|
Spindasis lohita
|
UC
|
Small White
|
Artogeia rapae
|
R
|
Orange Awlet
|
Bibasis oedipodea
|
R
|
Baron
|
Euthalia phemius
|
UC
|
Grey Pansy
|
Junonia atlites
|
C
|
Lemon Pansy
|
Junonia lemonias
|
UC
|
Blue Pansy
|
Junonia orithya
|
UC
|
Grass Demon
|
Udaspes folus
|
R
|
Red Admiral
|
Vanessa indica
|
UC
|
Painted Lady
|
Vanessa cardui
|
R
|
Hong Kong
Lacewing
|
Cethosia biblis
|
UC
|
Hong Kong Fritillary
|
Argyreus hyperbius
|
VC
|
Swallowtail
|
Papilio xuthus
|
UC
|
Chinese Peacock
|
Papilio bianor
|
C
|
Fivebar
Swordtail
|
Graphium antiphates
|
C
|
Golden Birdwing
|
Troides aeacus
|
R
|
Birdwing
|
Troides helena
|
UC
|
Yellow Orange
Tip
|
Ixias pyrene
|
UC
|
Abundance: C = common, VC =
very common, UN = uncommon, R = rare (Walthew 1997)
Table 8.5 Butterfly Sspecies Rrecorded in the Sstudy area during field surveys. Site.
Codes of abundance as in
Table 8.4
Common name
|
Latin name
|
Abundance
|
Common Faun
|
Faunis eumeus
|
C
|
Blue Glassy
Tiger
|
Ideopsis similes
|
VC
|
Dark Veined
Tiger
|
Danaus genutia
|
VC
|
Blue Spotted
Crow
|
Euploea midamus
|
VC
|
Common Lascar
|
Pantoporia hordonia
|
C
|
Great Eggfly
|
Hypolimnas bolina
|
C
|
Short-banded
Sailor
|
Phaedyma columella
|
C
|
Angled Castor
|
Ariadne ariadne
|
C
|
Punchinello
|
Zemeros flegyas
|
C
|
Paris Peacock
|
Papilio paris
|
VC
|
Red Helen
|
Papilio helenus
|
VC
|
Common Mormon
|
Papilio polytes
|
VC
|
Tailed Green
Jay
|
Graphium agamemnon
|
VC
|
Great Orange
Tip
|
Hebomoia glaucippe
|
C
|
Common White
|
Artogeia canidia
|
VC
|
Common Black
Jezebel
|
Delias pasithoe
|
C
|
Common Grass
Yellow
|
Eurema hecabe
|
VC
|
Common
White-banded Brown
|
Lethe confusa
|
C
|
Dark Brand Bush
Brown
|
Mycalesis mineus
|
VC
|
Abundance:
C = common, VC = very common, UN = uncommon, R = rare (Walthew 1997)
8.53
The ecological
importance of the habitats
identified was evaluated against the criteria in Annex 8 of the EIAO EIAO-TM.EIA
Evaluation
of Woodland within the Study Area
Criteria
|
Discussion
|
Naturalness
|
A mixture of planted
and native species
|
Size
|
5.1 ha
|
Diversity
|
Moderate plant
species diversity,
low to moderate for fauna
|
Rarity
|
Two uncommon tree
species, Celtis
biondii and Celtis timorensis. Three uncommon/rare bird species, Crested
Goshawk Accipiter
trivirgatus, Black-winged
Cuckoo-shrike and Grey-streaked Flycatcher Muscicapa griseisticta.
|
Re-creatability
|
Moderately difficult
to create in terms of species composition
|
Fragmentation
|
Patchy, surrounding
villages
|
Ecological Linkage
|
Not functionally
linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity
|
Potential value
|
Moderate with management such as
fire control
|
Nursery/Breeding
Ground
|
No record of
significant nursery or breeding ground during the surveys. But could provide
breeding habitats for birds, mammals and butterflies.
|
Age
|
Young
|
Abundance/Richness of
Wildlife
|
Low to moderate
|
|
Moderate
|
Evaluation
of Shrubland/Grassland within the Study Area
Criteria
|
Discussion
|
Naturalness
|
Natural in general,
with exception at backshore which are modified by development
|
Size
|
Large continuous
patch on upper hillslopes
within the Study Area. The total size
of this habitat is approximately 23.8ha.
|
Diversity
|
Moderate to high
plant species diversity, low fauna diversity
|
Rarity
|
Three uncommon/rare
bird species, Crested Goshawk Accipiter trivirgatus, Black-winged Cuckoo-shrike and
Grey-streaked Flycatcher Muscicapa
griseisticta.
The endemic anuran species Romer’s Tree Frog Philautus romeri was reported by another study.
|
Re-creatability
|
This habitat can be
re-created, but some native species are not commercially available
|
Fragmentation
|
Less fragmented
|
Ecological Linkage
|
Not functionally
linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity
|
Potential value
|
Moderate, become
secondary woodland over time, but limited by fire disturbance
|
Nursery/Breeding
Ground
|
No record of significant
nursery or breeding ground during the surveys. But could Romer’s Tree Frog calling
was reported by a separated study (see Figure 8.8). This habitat in general also provides breeding habitats
for birds, mammals and butterflies.
|
Age
|
Young
|
Abundance/Richness of
Wildlife
|
Low wildlife richness
and abundance
|
|
Low (*excluding the small moist area used by Romer’s
Tree Frog in Figure 8.8 which has moderate to high
Overall Ecological Value)
|
Evaluation
of Cultivated Lands
within the Study Area
Criteria
|
Discussion
|
Naturalness
|
|
Size
|
About 1 ha
|
Diversity
|
Low plant
diversity.
|
Rarity
|
None recorded
|
Re-creatability
|
This habitat can be readily re-created
|
Fragmentation
|
Isolated pockets in
the Study Area
|
Ecological Linkage
|
Not functionally
linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity.
|
Potential value
|
Low
|
Nursery/Breeding
Ground
|
No record of
significant nursery or breeding ground
during the surveys.
|
Age
|
Young
|
Abundance/Richness of
Wildlife
|
Low
|
|
Low
|
Evaluation
of Fishponds within the Study Area
Criteria
|
Discussion
|
Naturalness
|
|
Size
|
About 0.1ha
|
Diversity
|
Low species
diversity
|
Rarity
|
Low fauna diversity.
|
Re-creatability
|
This habitat can be
readily re-created.
|
Fragmentation
|
Isolated within the
Study Area.
|
Ecological Linkage
|
Not functionally
linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity.
|
Potential value
|
It could become
mangroves/marsh habitat over time if left unmanaged.
|
Nursery/Breeding
Ground
|
No record of
significant nursery or breeding ground during the surveys.
|
Age
|
Young
|
Abundance/Richness of
Wildlife
|
Low
|
|
Low
|
Evaluation
of Streams within
the Study Area
Criteria
|
Discussion
|
Naturalness
|
|
Size
|
The total length of
the freshwater streams is about 700m
|
Diversity
|
Low aquatic
invertebrate species and
other wildlife diversity
|
Rarity
|
One uncommon bird
species, Yellow Bittern Ixobrychus sinensis.
|
Re-creatability
|
Difficult to be
re-created
|
Fragmentation
|
Not applicable
|
Ecological Linkage
|
Not functionally
linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity
|
Potential value
|
Medium, more aquatic
species could establish if given time
|
Nursery/Breeding
Ground
|
Not functionally
linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity
|
Age
|
No information but
considered irrelevant
|
Abundance/Richness of
Wildlife
|
Low
|
|
Low
|
Evaluation
of Urbanised Area within the Study Area
Criteria
|
Discussion
|
Naturalness
|
|
Size
|
The total size of
this habitat is approximately 2.8ha
|
Diversity
|
Low plant diversity
|
Rarity
|
Neither rare nor
protected species recorded during the surveys
|
Re-creatability
|
This habitat can be
readily re-created
|
Fragmentation
|
Heavily fragmented
|
Ecological Linkage
|
Not functionally
linked to any highly valued habitat in close
proximity
|
Potential value
|
Low
|
Nursery/Breeding
Ground
|
No record of
significant nursery or breeding ground during the surveys. But can provide
nesting habitat for some disturbance tolerant bird species.
|
Age
|
No information but
considered irrelevant
|
Abundance/Richness of
Wildlife
|
The abundance and
richness of wildlife recorded were low
|
|
Low
|
Intertidal Ecology
8.54
The natural coastline along the south
shore of Sok Kwu Wan varies between an estuarine environment to the west of Sok
Kwu Wan and a granite boulder/cliff shoreline to the east of Sok Kwu Wan.
8.55
Intertidal "Important Habitats
Where an Ecological Assessment Will Be Necessary" listed in Note 2,
Appendix A, Annex 16 to the TM existing on and/or near the study area only include
undisturbed natural coastline over 1 ha or 500 m, on the south shore of Sok Kwu
Wan.
8.56
An intertidal sand flat is was located at
the southern end of Sok Kwu Wan, in front of Chung Mei Village, about 17,000 m2
in area, between the outlet of the channelled streams and the subtidal area of
the bay (Plate 8.4).
8.57
The natural rocky shore close to the
outfall and the sand flat outside the outlet of the streams were identified as
having ecological value and were surveyed.
Field Survey Methodology
Rocky shores
8.58
Preliminary field surveys were
undertaken on 22 and 23 September 1998.
It was found that Outfall Option 1 was located on steep bedrock and
could not be reached from either sides or above. Given that the distance between
the two Outfall Option was less than 250 m and their substrate type was
similar, data from Outfall Option 2 could represent the condition of the nearby
shore, including Outfall Option 1.
Therefore quantitative field surveys were conducted on 10 December 1998,
19 March 1999 and 29 June 1999 on the intertidal rocky shore community near
Outfall Option 2 on the south shore of Sok Kwu Wan. The slope was steep bedrock
contained large granite boulders. The shores are open to weather influences
from the north Lamma Channel and to disturbance by shipping wakes and can
therefore be regarded as semi-exposed.
8.59
The intertidal flora and fauna were
described through the use of belt transect methods. A single
transect was laid across the intertidal zone in the natural shorelines
(Fig.8.2). The transect covered the
wave splash level (0 m transect station) down to the sublittoral fringe. The low tide during the sampling period
averaged 0.6 mPD. Tide readings were
taken from nearby Chi Ma Wan tide station.
At 2 m intervals a quadrat measuring 0.25 m2 (0.5 m x 0.5 m)
was placed along the transect on the rock surface. All fauna within the quadrat were counted and identified to the
lowest taxon possible, and an estimate of percentage cover of macro algae
along grid lines
within the quadrat was made by naked eye. Sample specimens of fauna not identified in the field were taken
to the laboratory for further analysis.
Special attention was paid for any species of conservation importance. concern.
8.60
The bird community on the rocky shore
was studied using the transect count method (Fig. 8.2). A 1.75 km transect was
run on the study area. Birds seen or heard within 20 m from the transect were
identified to species and counted.
Records of bird sightings is listed in Appendix 8.3. Nomenclature followed Viney et al. (1996). Counts were carried out
on 22 September (autumn survey) and 7 December 1998 (winter survey), and 19
March (spring survey) and 10 June 1999 (summer survey).
Sandflat
8.61
Active searches of fauna were
conducted on the sandflat in 20 March, 29 June and 14July 1999. Sightings of
epifauna were recorded and identified to the lowest practicable taxon.
Results
Rocky
Shore
8.62
The intertidal community on the rocky shore community studied
was similar to those at found
on other semi-exposed coastlines in Hong Kong. Species recorded are listed in
Table 8.6. Fauna which typically inhabit both exposed and sheltered shores were
found in the study site.
8.63
Near the Outfall Option 2, fauna
recorded on the rocky outcrops included three littorinid snails in the littoral
fringe: Littorina scabra, Littorina brevicula and Nodilittorina millegrana (Morton and
Morton 1983).
8.64
The intertidal community on
the rocky shore was similar to that found on semi-exposed shores. Fauna
of both wave exposed shores, such as Grapsus
albolineatus (Crustacea, Brachyura), Eriphia
smithii (Crustacea, Brachyura) and Septifer
bilocularis (Bivalvia, Lamellibranchia), and boulder shores, such as Polycheir rufescens (Echinodermata,
Holothuroidea), Petrolisthes japonicus
(Crustacea, Anomura) and Gaetice
depressus (Crustacea, Brachyura), were found.
8.65
Strong seasonality was shown by
macroalgae. Sargassum sp. floated
along the coastline in spring and Ulva
sp. grew on low intertidal rock surfaces. Both were abundant.
8.66
No fauna known to be rare was found
during surveys. Overall the fauna appeared to be lacking in diversity and
abundance. As with most shores of Hong
Kong, zonation patterns were evident.
8.67
Results of the four seasonal surveys
are provided in Table 8.7-8.10. Beside the obvious zonation pattern, a trend of
increase in abundance from winter to summer is also shown in the results. The
significant increase in algae abundance in spring 1999 is also consistent with
the seasonal growth pattern of algae in Hong Kong.
Table 8.6 Flora
and fauna found along the rocky shore of Sok Kwu Wan
Phylum/Class
|
Scientific
name
|
Common name
|
Algae
|
Lithophyllum sp.
|
Pink crust
algae
|
|
Corallina pilulifera
|
Red turf algae
|
|
Porphyra suborbiculata
|
Red algae
|
|
Sargassum sp.
|
Brown algae
|
|
Ulva sp.
|
Green algae
|
Amphineura
|
Acanthopleura japonica
|
Chiton
|
Bivalvia
|
Septifer bilocularis
|
Black mussel
|
|
Saccostrea
cucullata
|
Rock oyster
|
Gastropoda
|
Cellana
toreuma
|
Limpet
|
|
Patelloida saccharina
|
Limpet
|
|
Littorina scabra
|
Snail
|
|
Littorina brevicula
|
Snail
|
|
Nodilittorina millegrana
|
Snail
|
|
Nodilittorina pyramidalis
|
Snail
|
|
Thais clavigera
|
Snail
|
|
Monodonta labio
|
Snail
|
|
Nerita
albicilla
|
Snail
|
|
Lunella
coronata
|
Snail
|
Crustacea
|
Tetraclita sp.
|
Barnacle
|
|
Ligia exotica
|
Sea slater
|
|
Petrolisthes japonicus
|
Porcelain crab
|
|
Eriphia smithii
|
Crab
|
|
Gaetice depressus
|
Crab
|
|
Grapsus albolineatus
|
Crab
|
|
Nanosesarma minutum
|
Crab
|
Echinodermata
|
Polycheir rufescens
|
Sea cucumber
|
Species richness
|
|
26
|
Table 8.7 Intertidal
fauna and algae recorded on preliminary surveys at Sok Kwu Wan, September 1998
Scientific
name
|
Common name
|
Lithophyllum sp.
|
Pink crust
algae
|
Corallina pilulifera
|
Red turf algae
|
Porphyra suborbiculata
|
Red algae
|
Acanthopleura japonica
|
Chiton
|
Cellana toreuma
|
Limpet
|
Patelloida saccharina
|
Limpet
|
Nodilitorina pyramidalis
|
Snail
|
Nodilittorina millegrana
|
Snail
|
Thais clavigera
|
Snail
|
Species richness
|
9
|
Table 8.8 Abundance
of intertidal fauna and percent cover of algae inside quadrats long the
transect near Outfall Option 2 in winter 1998
Scientific name
|
Station S1 (0 m)
High Tide
|
Station S2 (2 m)
|
Station S3 (4 m)
|
Station S4 (6 m)
Low Tide
|
Nodilittorina
pyramidalis
|
6
|
1
|
|
|
Nodilittorina millegrana
|
8
|
|
|
|
Thais
clavigera
|
|
7
|
4
|
1
|
Acanthopleura
japonica
|
|
|
3
|
|
Patelloida
saccharina
|
|
|
1
|
|
Lithophyllum
sp.
|
|
|
|
15%
|
Corallina
pilulifera
|
|
|
|
20%
|
Total
species richness
|
|
|
|
7
|
Total
abundance
|
|
|
|
30
|
Table 8.9 Abundance
of intertidal fauna and percent cover of algae inside quadrats along the
transect near Outfall Option 2 in spring 1999
Scientific name
|
Station S1 (0 m)
High Tide
|
Station S2 (2 m)
|
Station S3 (4 m)
|
Station S4 (6 m)
Low Tide
|
Nodilittorina
pyramidalis
|
|
|
|
|
Nodilittorina millegrana
|
10
|
|
|
|
Thais
clavigera
|
|
|
|
|
Monodonta
albio
|
3
|
1
|
|
|
Nerita
albicilla
|
1
|
|
|
|
Saccostrea
cucullata
|
|
|
25
|
|
Acanthopleura
japonica
|
|
1
|
|
|
Patelloida
saccharina
|
|
8
|
50
|
|
Lunella
coronata
|
|
1
|
|
|
Ulva
sp.
|
|
10%
|
30%
|
|
Lithophyllum sp.
|
|
15%
|
10%
|
|
Corallina
pilulifera
|
|
|
5%
|
10%
|
Total
species richness
|
|
|
|
12
|
Total
abundance
|
|
|
|
100
|
Table 8.10 Abundance
of intertidal fauna and percent cover of algae inside quadrats along the
transect near Outfall Option 2 in summer 1999
Scientific name
|
Station S1 (0 m)
High Tide
|
Station S2 (2 m)
|
Station S3 (4 m)
|
Station S4 (6 m)
Low Tide
|
Nodilittorina
pyramidalis
|
16
|
|
|
|
Nodilittorina millegrana
|
17
|
|
|
|
Thais
clavigera
|
|
|
|
6
|
Acanthopleura
japonica
|
|
2
|
1
|
|
Tetraclita
sp.
|
|
17
|
110
|
|
Monodonta
albio
|
|
9
|
1
|
|
Setifer
bilocularis
|
|
2
|
|
|
Patelloida
saccharina
|
|
50
|
|
|
Saccostrea
cucullata
|
|
|
140
|
100
|
Nerita
albicilla
|
|
|
|
4
|
Lunella
coronata
|
|
|
|
6
|
Lithophyllum sp.
|
|
|
|
30%
|
Corallina
pilulifera
|
|
|
|
|
Total
species richness
|
|
|
|
13
|
Total
abundance
|
|
|
|
474
|
8.68
Intertidal surveys were carried out
for the feasibility study of the Western Coast Road (ERM, 1998) during 1997.
The quantitative survey was undertaken in Chiu Keng Wan on the inter-tidal
rocky shore community along the alignment of P2 Road in Junk Bay. Similar to other hard shores in Hong Kong, a
clear vertical zonation pattern was evident through community structure. Table
8.11 summarises the result of the Western Coast Road survey. 29 species of
flora and fauna were recorded. The species richness recorded was similar with
that in the present survey (26 in Table 8.6).
Table
8.11. Summary of Species Identified Along Shoreline
of Chiu Keng Wan During Preliminary Field Surveys (ERM, 1998)
Species
|
Abundance
|
Zone
|
|
|
Low-shore
|
Mid-shore
|
High-shore
|
Mobile Fauna
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nodillittorina trochoides
|
Low to moderate
|
|
X
|
X
|
Nodillittorina radiata
|
Moderate to high
|
|
X
|
X
|
Nodillittorina vidua
|
Moderate to high
|
|
X
|
X
|
Littoraria articulata
|
Low
|
|
X
|
X
|
Peasiella roepstorffiana
|
Low
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chlorostoma argyrstomus
|
Low
|
X
|
|
|
Lunella coronata
|
Low
|
X
|
X
|
|
Nerita albicilla
|
Low
|
|
X
|
|
Monodonta labio
|
Low
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cellana grata
|
Low
|
|
X
|
|
Cellana toreuma
|
Moderate
|
|
X
|
|
Patelloida saccharina
|
Moderate to high
|
X
|
X
|
|
Patelloida pygmaea
|
Low to moderate
|
X
|
X
|
|
Siphonaria sirius
|
Low
|
X
|
X
|
|
Siphonaria japonica
|
Low
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acanthopleura japonica
|
Moderate
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thais clavigera
|
Moderate
|
X
|
|
|
Morula musiva
|
Low
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barbatia virescens
|
Low
|
X
|
|
|
Septifer virgatus
|
Low
|
|
X
|
|
Saccostrea cucullata
|
Low to moderate
|
X
|
X
|
|
Barnacles
|
|
|
|
|
Tetraclita sp.
|
High
|
X
|
X
|
|
Capitulum mitella
|
Low
|
|
X
|
X
|
Sea anemone
|
|
|
|
|
Unknown sp.
|
Low
|
X
|
|
|
Algae
|
|
|
|
|
Ralfsia expansa
|
High
|
X
|
|
|
Hildenbrandtia prototypus
|
High
|
X
|
|
|
Green turf
|
High
|
X
|
|
|
Encrusting coralline
|
High
|
X
|
|
|
Kyrthrix maculans
|
Moderate
|
|
X
|
|
8.69
A verification survey for intertidal
habitats was performed in April 2002 to verify the data from surveys in 1998 to
1999. No significant changes were found in the intertidal hard-surface habitat.
The composition species and their densities of the rocky shore communities
matched with the finding of the surveys in 1998 to 1999. No algae were found on
the intertidal rocky surface, though Sargassum
was seen in the shallow subtidal zone just seaward to the study site.
Table 8.12 Abundance
of intertidal fauna inside quadrats along the transect near Outfall Option 2 in
2002
Scientific name
|
Station S1 (0 m)
High Tide
|
Station S2 (2 m)
|
Station S3 (4 m)
|
Station S4 (6 m)
Low Tide
|
Nodilittorina
pyramidalis
|
10
|
|
|
|
Nodilittorina millegrana
|
8
|
|
|
|
Thais
clavigera
|
|
|
|
3
|
Tetraclita
sp.
|
|
21
|
88
|
|
Monodonta
albio
|
|
2
|
10
|
2
|
Setifer
bilocularis
|
|
|
3
|
|
Patelloida
saccharina
|
|
|
36
|
|
Saccostrea
cucullata
|
|
|
110
|
85
|
Nerita
albicilla
|
|
|
1
|
1
|
Lunella
coronata
|
|
|
|
5
|
Total
species richness
|
|
|
|
10
|
Total
abundance
|
|
|
|
385
|
8.70
A total of 94 birds of 12 species were
recorded on the rocky shores (Appendix 8.3). Most species recorded on the rocky shore are
habitat generalist and are typical of disturbed area (e.g., Crested Myna Acridotheres cristatellus, Tree
Sparrow). Two species of conservation
importance were recorded and these were the Reef Egret Egretta sacra and Black-eared Kite. Black-eared Kite is habitat generalist, while Reef Egret is more
dependent on rocky shore. The
conservation importance of these two species are shown in Table 8.12b.
Table 8.12b Bird species of special conservation
importance recorded at rocky shore on the study area
Species
|
Protection
Status*
|
Distribution
|
Rarity
|
Black-eared
Kite
|
Class 2 Protected Animal of
PRC and Appendix II of CITES
|
Found in
many types of habitats
|
Common
resident
|
Reef Egret
|
Class 2 Protected Animal of
PRC
|
Usually
found in coastal areas
|
Uncommon/rare
resident
|
Sandflat
8.71
At low tide, the sand flat was exposed
and with was crossed
by only limited sheet flows, to the seaward side (Plate 8.4).
Wastewater from nearby restaurants and residential areas would be discharged
into the sand flat. The high organic content of the substratum was shown by the
black coloration of the subsurface sediments.
8.72
Numerous burrows were scattered on the
sand flats, mainly belonging to crabs including Uca borealis, Uca lactea
and Uca arcuata. Scylla serrata, Scorpimera sp. and Macrophthalmus
sp. were also found here. Fauna
composition is similar with those in other sandflat habitats in Hong Kong such
as Starfish Bay in Ma On Shan (Morton & Morton 1983). Uca species, Scorpimera
sp. and Macrophthalmus sp. showed a
zonation distribution on the sandflats in both Sok Kwu Wan and Starfish Bay.
8.73
Within the sheet flows on the east of
the sand flat, small horseshoe crabs Tachypleus
tridentatus (Plate 8.7) was found
both on the surface and semi-buried in June and July 1999. 22 individuals were
counted in the summer survey, ranging from 3-5 cm in prosoma breadth.
8.74
A verification survey was conducted in April 2002 to verify the
data collected in 1998 to 1999. The ecological conditions of the sandflat in
2002 have not significant changes with 1998. The fauna recorded also matched
with the previous field survey results. However, no horseshoe crabs were
recorded in 2002 survey. Horseshoe crabs are
more numerous in Hong Kong’s western waters whilst records in eastern waters
are only sporadic. Chiu & Morton (1999) observed Tachypleus tridentatus adults from East Lamma Channel, though, Sok
Kwu Wan was not on the list of the 27 sites where horseshoe crab were recorded
during their study period. There is no evidence to demonstrate that Sok Kwu Wan
is regularly utilised by horseshoe crabs.
Evaluation of Intertidal
Habitat within the Study Area
Criteria
|
Discussion
|
Naturalness
|
|
Size
|
About 2.8km coastline
|
Diversity
|
Low
fauna diversity
|
Rarity
|
Juvenile Horseshoe
crabs were recorded on the sandflat during the surveys
|
Re-creatability
|
This habitat is
difficult to re-create
|
Fragmentation
|
Partially fragmented
|
Ecological Linkage
|
Not functionally
linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity
|
Potential value
|
Moderate
|
Nursery/Breeding
Ground
|
Juvenile Horseshoe
crabs were recorded on the sandflat
in 1999, but not found in 2002.
|
Age
|
No information but
considered irrelevant
|
Abundance/Richness of
Wildlife
|
The abundance and
richness of wildlife recorded were low
|
|
Moderate
|
Subtidal Ecology
8.75
Subtidal "Important Habitats
Where an Ecological Assessment Will Be Necessary" listed in Note 2,
Appendix A, Annex 16 to the TM existing on and/or near the study area include
established coral communities at Pak Kok, about 3.5 km north of the study area,
at Luk Chau, about 1.5 km north of the study area (Binnie 1993), and at Sham
Wan about 2 km south of the study area (Planning Department 1993).
8.76
None of these areas is immediately
adjacent to the study area. No information about the coral communities inside
Sok Kwu Wan was available. To find out the conditions of the coral communities
within the study area, diving surveys were conducted.
Field Survey Methodology
8.77
Two sites were selected for dive
surveys on coral communities (Figure 8.2). Site 1 was near Outfall Option 1 and
site 2 was near Outfall Option 2. Dive surveys were completed in December
1998. Dives were conducted along both
optional outfall alignments.
8.78
Underwater quantitative surveys along
both proposed alignments were completed on 2 December 1998. At each option (Option 1: N: 22 12 552, E
114 08 556 / Option 2: N 22 12 564, E 114 08 403) a line transect was run out
at a bearing relating to the angle of the alignment. A 50 m line was laid and 10 m transects were performed at 0 – 5
meter and 45-50 meter distance from the shoreline.
8.79
Video transects were recorded at each
of the two survey sites. The transects were laid parallel to the shore and
following an approximate depth contour. At each site transects were laid in two
distinct depth zones: 0-3m and 4-7 m below C.D. Four transects were recorded at
the shallow depth zone and two transects at the deeper depth zone.
8.80
Each transect was filmed at
approximately 40cm above the substrate and at a rate of approximately 75
seconds (a rate of 15-20 cm per sec).
The video recorded a 40cm swath of coral (seabed) from a height of
approximately 40cm. The video camera was held perpendicular to the substrate to
minimise parallax error and to keep the substrate in focus. Each set of video footage from each site was
copied from Hi8 to VHS after editing.
8.81
The video transect was played back on
an ordinary TV monitor. Each transect was paused at fixed timed intervals of
three seconds at individual video frames and a number of points sampled. A
fixed time interval of three seconds was used between video frames to ensure no
overlap between frames. The video transects were sampled using a random point
sampling method. Fixed random co-ordinates were marked on an acetate sheet
which was placed in front of the TV screen. The points were used as reference
marks from which to identify the hard coral species abundance. Approximately
22-25 video frames per 10 m transect were obtained for a total of 110-125
points per transect
8.82
Each 10m video transect yielded 22-25
video frames, for a total of 110-125 points per transect. The point count data
were used to calculate percent cover for each site. Since this and similar
sampling methods tends to be biased against the inclusion of rare species,
presence-absence data were also gathered for coral species by viewing the
entire videotape of each transect.
8.83
A further coral mapping survey was
conducted in May 2002 to record the locations and number of coral colonies in
the subtidal area of Outfall Option 1 (Site 1), which was considered to have
higher potential on being selected as the preferred option during the EIA.
8.84
The main objectives of this work were
to record the species number, locations and sizes of coral colonies along the
alignment and within the dredging area of Outfall Option 1., and to identify
potential translocation sites on the nearby coastline to facilitate a
translocation plan where necessary.
8.85
The survey included three parts: 1) A
quantitative dive survey to count and record the coral colonies (hard and soft)
in terms of their species, size, abundance, distribution and ecological
significance, or species of conservation concernimportance within the
dredging area; 2) To capture underwater video transects and benthic cover/ecological
attributes of four major transects; and 3) To identify potential translocation
sites. This survey also verified the findings from the previous dive survey
conducted in 1998.
8.86
1) Coral mapping at Outfall Option 1:
A transect with scale was deployed along the outfall alignment (Main transect)
as indicated on Figure A8.5-1 in Appendix 8.5. The Main
transect extended for 50 m. The exact location of the starting point of the
Main Transect was determined with a portable Global Positioning System (GPS).
Starting from 1m distance on the Main transect, transects parallel to the
coastline (Parallel transect) were deployed at 2m intervals. The Parallel
transects extended 17m from both sides of the Main transect, thus covering a
width of 34m to ensure a complete coverage of the dredging area (33m in width).
The total number of Parallel transects was 25. Within 1m on either side of each
Parallel transect, the locations of any coral colonies (both hard and soft)
found were recorded with reference to the Parallel transects and Main transect.
A specific code was assigned to each colony recorded. Their sizes and the sizes
of the boulders on which they colonise were also estimated and recorded.
Photographs of representative coral colonies located in the surveyed areas were
taken using an underwater camera. Results were presented as a map showing the
locations of all coral colonies within the dredging area. The total number of
coral colonies, their sizes and the sizes of the boulders beneath were also
provided according to their assigned codes.
8.87
2) Video recording and ecological
assessment at Outfall Option 1 Video transects were recorded on the Main
transect and three of the Parallel transects in which most coral colonies were
recorded. Each transect was filmed at approximately 40cm above the substrate
and at a constant speed in compliance with standard protocols for coral surveys
(no more than 10 metres per minute). The video camera was held perpendicular to
the substrate to minimise parallelax error and to keep the substrate in focus.
The video transects recorded a 40cm swath of seabed The video for the Main
transect showed the zoning of seabed substrate along the outfall alignment, and
also the distance of the band in which most corals could be found. Video tapes
for the parallel transects showed whether there was any change of coral colony
density along the coastline within the dredging area. The video tapes of
Parallel transects were also used to rectify the locations of coral colonies
recorded in the field. The present conditions of coral colonies were recorded
on site and extracted from the video transects. Information concerning the
physical nature of Outfall Option 1 were recorded during the survey. This
information consisted of observations regarding the degree of exposure of the
site to wave action, the nature of the substrate type and the topographic
profile of the site. In addition to video recording, the benthic cover and
ecological attributes of the above 4 major transects were recorded following
the Rapid Ecological Assessment (REA) technique.
8.88
3) Identification of potential
translocation sites Bound dives were conducted along the coastline between Mo
Tat Wan and Sok Kwu Wan. Two location suitable for translocation purpose were
identified and recorded on maps. The conditions of the subtidal habitats, as
well as the marine ecological assemblages, especially the present conditions of
any exiting coral colonies, in the vicinity of the potential translocation
sites were recorded with the provision of video samples and/or photographs.
Information concerning the physical nature of the potential translocation sites
was also recorded. This information
included the degree of exposure of the sites to wave action, the nature of the
substrate types and the topographic profiles of the sites.
Results
Site 1
8.89
Raw data from the coral surveys are
provided in Appendix 8.4. The boulder sublittoral extended approximately 20 m
from the shoreline and was wider
than that at site 2. Hard coral cover was marginally
higher and consisted of more species.
Hard corals were also observed at lower depths (3-4m below CD). In total 13 species were recorded (Table 8.1113) and coral
cover was less than 5% (mean 2.26%) (Figure 8.3). Approximately 8 m out from the
shore a band of dead standing coral was observed. The dead coral was the remnants of several Pavona descussata stands.
Table 8.1113 Coral species recorded at Site 1, December
1998
Family
|
Species
|
Dendrophylliidae
|
Turbinaria peltata
|
Faviidae
|
Cyphastrea sp
|
Faviidae
|
Favia lizardensis
|
|
Favia speciosa
|
Faviidae
|
Favites abdita
|
Faviidae
|
Favites flexuosa
|
Faviidae
|
Favites pentagona
|
Faviidae
|
Goniastrea aspera
|
Faviidae
|
Hydnophora exesa
|
Faviidae
|
Platygyra sinensis
|
Faviidae
|
Plesiastrea versipora
|
Poritidae
|
Goniopora stutchburyi
|
Poritidae
|
Goniopora columna
|
8.90
Further out from
the shoreline, the seabed consisted of scattered small boulders and eventually
at 30-40 m out from the shoreline the seabed was composed mainly of fine
sand/silt with isolated patches of shell fragments. Three Pteroeides sp.
(sea pens) were also observed.
Site
2
8.91
This site was
nearer to the Fish Culture Zone (Figure 8.2) Hard coral cover was restricted to
a narrow band of boulder substrate, approximately 5 m in width and not more
than 1.5 m below CD. Coral cover was
estimated at less than five percent (mean 2.75%) (Figure 8.4), and eight
species of scleractinian coral were observed (Table 8.1214).
Table 8.1214 Coral species
recorded at Site 2 in December 1998
Family
|
Species
|
Dendrophylliidae
|
Turbinaria peltata
|
Faviidae
|
Cyphastrea
sp.
|
Faviidae
|
Favia
lizardensis
|
Faviidae
|
Favites
pentagona
|
Faviidae
|
Favia
speciosa
|
Faviidae
|
Goniastrea
aspera
|
Faviidae
|
Plesiastrea
versipora
|
Faviidae
|
Platygyra
sinensis
|
8.92
Once the hard
substrate ended the benthic substrate consisted of silty sand and was devoid of
marine life. One large concrete block
(1 m3) was located at roughly 4m depth near the Fish Culture Zone;
the concrete appeared to act as an artificial reef, as several colonies of Dendronephthya sp. were seen attached to
the upper surface of the block.
8.93
Site 1 possessed
more species of hard coral and slightly lower coverage (2.26 %), though, the
hard coral cover in Site 2 (2.75 % coverage) was still low relative to major
coral communities within Hong Kong’s waters.
This site did exhibit evidence of disturbance with dead stands of Pavona descussata, however, several
small (juvenile) coral colonies were observed and there were various species of
fishes present.
8.94
Site 1 was more
diverse in marine life due to:
higher species
richness of hard corals (13 species);
additional invertebrate life associated with
the hard coral cover e.g. gastropods; colonies of soft coral (Dendronephthya sp.) and the presence of
sea pens in the sand;
presence of
fishes, and
wider band of
hard substrate suitable for further coral settlement and growth.
8.95
The percent cover
of organisms in Site 1 and Site 2 were 2.26 % and 2.75 % respectively, much lower than that found at
Pak Kok off north Lamma (13.09%) (Binnie, 1993). The coral communities inside
the Sok Kwu Wan study area are therefore considered to be less established and
have less conservation value than other coral communities around Lamma.
8.96
In the coral
mapping survey, 280 coral colonies were recorded within the 33m x 50m surveyed
area. The coral colonies were dominated by Platygyra
sp., Plesiastrea sp.,Favites sp. and Favia sp.. All recorded coral colonies were of common genera in
Hong Kong and their sizes were also small. Given these two factors, the
conservation value of these coral colonies were not considered high. Detailed
results of the coral mapping survey were presented in Appendix 8.5 of this
chapter.
Evaluation
of Subtidal Habitat within the Study Area
Criteria
|
Discussion
|
Naturalness
|
|
Size
|
The entire Picnic Bay
|
Diversity
|
Low
diversity
|
Rarity
|
Neither rare nor
protected species recorded during the surveys
|
Re-creatability
|
This habitat can not
be re-created
|
Fragmentation
|
N/A
|
Ecological Linkage
|
Not functionally
linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity
|
Potential value
|
Moderate
|
Nursery/Breeding
Ground
|
No record of
significant nursery or breeding ground during the surveys. But can provide
nesting habitat for some
disturbance tolerant bird species.
|
Age
|
N/A
|
Abundance/Richness of Wildlife
|
The abundance and richness of wildlife
recorded were low
|
Overall Ecological Value Abundance/Richness of Wildlife
|
Low
to moderate The
abundance and richness of wildlife recorded
were low
|
Summary of Baseline Conditions
8.97
Terrestrial habitats found within the
study area are in general young and disturbed.
Two uncommon One rare
tree and one restricted tree species were recorded in woodland
habitat.
8.98
The shrubland/grassland mosaic
habitats supported some rare and uncommon butterfly and bird species, both
reported in field surveys and from literature review. Bird abundance in the shrubland/grassland mosaic habitats,
however, was low. Recorded species are
typical of disturbed areas. The only
coastal bird species of conservation significance was the Reef Egret, as
Black-eared Kite is habitat generalist.Recently, in a small area of this habitat near the Pumping Station P2 site, calling of 6 male Romer’s
Tree Frogs was reported during an ecological survey for a separated project within the study area
of the present proposed Project (Halcrow China Limited 2002). This species is endemic to Hong Kong (Karsen et al. 1998).
8.99
The natural coastline along the south
shore of Sok Kwu Wan varies between an estuarine environment to the west of Sok
Kwu Wan and a granite boulder/cliff shoreline, semi-exposed coastlines to the
east of Sok Kwu Wan. Intertidal surveys indicated that the rocky shore
community consisted of organisms of exposed rocky shores and of boulder shores. The intertidal fauna recorded was of low
abundance and diversity. The only aquatic species of conservation concernimportance found so far is the horseshoe crab Tachypleus tridentatus in
the sand flat. The only
coastal bird species of conservation importance was the Reef Egret, as
Black-eared Kite is habitat generalist.
8.100
Site1 (near Outfall Option 1): The boulder sublittoral zone extended
approximately 20 m from the granite cliff-face. Hard corals were observed at depths of 3-4 m below chart
datum. A total of 13 species were
recorded and coral cover was less than 5%.
All these corals are common and widely distributed
in Hong Kong. Further out from the shoreline the seabed consisted of small
boulders and at 30-40 m from the shoreline the substrate was mainly composed of
fine sand/silt with isolated shell fragments.
8.101
Site 2 (Outfall Option 2): The
narrow boulder sublittoral zone which extended out from the steep granite cliff
face was approximately 5 m wide. Hard
corals were not recorded growing below 1.5 m chart datum. Coral cover was estimated at less than
5%. In total 8 species of coral were
recorded. All of them can be found at
Site 1. Beyond the boulder zone the substrate changed rapidly to a
silty/sand/mud seabed. The area of underwater bedrock and boulders, which
provided substrate for coral colonisation, was smaller at site 2.
8.102
The coral community near Outfall
Option 1 contains more hard coral species, while the conditions of the sea
bottom near Outfall Option 2 are less suitable for coral colonisation.
8.103
In the coral mapping survey conducted
in 2002, 280 colonies of corals were recorded within the 33m x 50m surveyed
area. The genera of the corals were all common and widely distributed in Hong
Kong. The majority of the coral colonies were also small in size.
8.104
Impacts to habitats, species or groups
were assessed based on the guidelines in Annexes 8 and 16 of the TM, the
consultants’ local knowledge and international standards and practice in
conservation biology.
8.105
The significance of ecological impacts
is evaluated based primarily on the criteria set forth in Table 1, Annex 8 of
the TM:
·
habitat quality;
·
species affected;
·
size/abundance of habitats/organisms
affected;
·
duration of impacts;
·
reversibility of impacts; and
·
magnitude of environmental changes.
8.106
Impacts are generally ranked as
"minor", "moderate" or "severe", although in a
few cases a ranking of "minimal" (less than "minor") may be
given. The ranking of a given impact
would vary based on the criteria listed above.
For example, an impact might be ranked as "minor" if it
affected only common species and habitats, or if it affected only small numbers
of individuals or small areas, whereas it might be ranked as "severe"
if it affected rare species or habitats, large numbers of individuals or large
areas. The major factors giving rise to
a ranking are explained in the text. As
noted in Annex 16 of the TM, a degree of professional judgement is involved in
the evaluation of impacts.
8.107
This section of the report assesses
potential impacts of the sewer alignment, outfall and STW from a cumulative
ecological perspective.
Construction
Stage
8.108
The proposed projectProject (Figure
2.25) includes construction of:
·
sewer alignment;
·
pumping stations;
·
STW (sewage treatment works); and
·
submarine sewage outfall
Terrestrial Ecology
8.109
The sewer alignment and related
facilities would follow much of the coastal belt of Sok Kwu Wan. It is envisaged that the sewer alignment
would be built along the existing pathway that leads to Mo Tat Wan rather than
along the natural shoreline. Under the
Recommended Scheme, the STW would be built within the disused quarry rather
than on a reclaimed site (preliminary scheme SMP option). This section of the report considers the
potential impacts of project construction on terrestrial ecology. Potential sources of impact include:
·
Habitat loss;
·
Site runoff;
·
Construction dust; and
·
Noise and disturbance.
Habitat Loss
8.110
The sewer alignment would lie
underground in the urbanised area or the existing footpath until it reaches the
STW. No natural habitats would be affected in this section of sewer during
construction phase. The sewer pipe running from the STW to the submarine
outfall would be laid, also underground, along the existing footpath. The
construction works for sewer pipe might encroach the habitat on the hillside,
and temporary loss of shrubland-grassland habitat would be anticipated. The Recommended
Scheme would cause a loss of 0.23 ha of
shrubland/grassland habitat. Potential impacts on terrestrial vegetation,
however, are predicted to be minor due to the disturbed nature of the habitats,
the relatively short length of the sewer pipe and the commonness of the plant
species recorded.
8.111
Due to the proximity of the two uncommon rare and
restricted tree species to the road, construction of the pipeline
may encroach to these trees. Potential
impacts would be minor to moderate, and should be avoided or mitigated. The STW site would be
located in a disused quarry which is sparsely vegetated. The pumping stations would sit on urbanised
areas. Therefore, loss of
shrubland-grassland habitats in the disused quarry due to the construction of
these facilities is considered to be minimal to minor.
8.112
The STW site would be located
in a disused quarry which is sparsely vegetated. The pumping stations would sit on urbanised areas. Therefore, loss of shrubland-grassland habitats
in the disused quarry due to the construction of these facilities is considered
to be minimal to minor. Impacts to birds for the sewer alignment, pumping
stations and the STW site are predicted to be minor due to the disturbed nature
of the habitats, the commonness of the species recorded and low bird
abundance. In addition, most recorded
species are disturbance tolerant.
8.113
Impacts to reptiles and terrestrial invertebrates are predicted to be minor due to
the disturbed nature of the habitats and the commonness of the species
recorded. For amphibians, one pumping station (Pumping Station P2, see Figure 2.25) would be located in the
vicinity of the moist shrubland/grassland habitat in which Romer’s Tree Frog
calling was reported. The pumping station site boundary is located further
seaward than the moist area is, and has no overlap with the moist area. No habitat loss on the
Romer’s Tree Frog habitat would be caused. Impacts to birds for the
sewer alignment, pumping stations and the STW site are predicted to be minor
due to the disturbed nature of the habitats, the commonness of the species
recorded and low bird abundance. In
addition, most recorded species are disturbance tolerant.
Site runoff
8.114
The alignment of the proposed projectProject basically runs along the shoreline of
Sok Kwu Wan. The
potential of terrestrial habitats affected by site runoff would be slim as they are located at higher
elevations than the alignment is. The only concern in this
aspect would be the Romer’s Tree Frog site close to the Pumping Station P2 location. Though there would be no
direct loss of the Romer’s Tree Frog site from the present projectProject, if site runoff of large quantity from the present projectProject enters the site, it would deteriorate the quality
of the habitat. In the case of the present projectProject, the scale of the pumping station
construction work would be small, and the pumping station location is more seaward
than the tree frog site. Moreover, the pumping station location and the Romer’s Tree Frog site was separated by a slope. There would be little chance
for the site runoff, if any, to affect the Romer’s Tree Frog site. The impact is ranked as minimal. Nevertheless, in the light of the conservation value of this
species, additional measures were proposed in Section 8.1577 below to provide a complete
protection of the habitat. Impacts to reptiles and terrestrial invertebrates
is predicted to be minor due to the disturbed nature of the habitats and the
commonness of the species recorded.
Construction Dust
8.115
Natural terrestrial habitats exist
upland of the coastal path and backshore habitats exist towards the shore. Habitats adjacent to the path would be
affected by construction works including trenching, soil disposal, machinery
operation and general works areas.
Providing good site management practices are followed, dust should not
settle offsite and is not predicted to reach natural habitats in measurable
quantities. Any dust impacts would
therefore be minimal.
Noise and Disturbance
8.116
The works area would be linearly
confined along an existing concrete pathway. No noisy construction procedure
such as piling would be required. Due to the nature of the projectProject and
scale of equipment used, impacts on fauna, including the six bird species of conservation importance, are predicted to be minimal.
Intertidal Ecology
8.117
This section of the report considers
the potential impacts of project construction on intertidal ecology.
Potential
sources of impact include:
·
Habitat loss
·
Noise and disturbance; and
·
Site runoff.
Habitat loss
8.118
A section of sewer pipe connecting the
outfall and the sewer pipeline along the footpath would occupy an area of
intertidal habitat 10 m2 in size. The area occupied by the sewer
would not be available for wildlife use. Due to the limited area of intertidal
zone that would be occupied low abundance
and diversity of intertidal fauna recorded in the area, and the availability of
similar habitat in the vicinity, the impact would be thus expected to be
minimal.
8.119
An area of 375m2 intertidal and shallow subtidal zone would
be occupied by a temporary steel platform for Horizontal Directional Drilling
during construction phase. The area, of which about two
third (about 250m2) within intertidal zone, in which both the
fauna abundance and diversity recorded were low, would be disturbed only by the supporting piles of
the platform. Due to the level of disturbance is not severe and the
availability of similar habitat in the vicinity, the impact would be thus
ranked as minor.
Noise and disturbance
8.120
A section of sewer pipe connecting the
outfall and the sewer pipeline along the footpath would occupy an area of
intertidal habitat 10 m2 in size. Reef Egret is the major
disturbance-sensitive receiver in the intertidal zone, while Black-eared Kite would not be subject to
disturbance due to their flying height. Bird abundance on the rocky shores, however, was low and most species are
common and widespread, and not dependent on rocky shores. Although the
application of a rising pipeline would significantly reduce the degree of
disturbance caused, the area occupied by the sewer remains the major
consideration on the assessment of impacts. Due to the limited area of
intertidal zone that would be occupied in any event, however, the impact would
be expected to be minimal.
Site runoff
8.121
Construction of the sewer pipes would
cause considerably small volume of site runoff, taking into account the limited
extent of trench excavation. The impact to the natural coastline due to site
runoff from construction is considered minor.
Juvenile horseshoe crabs were recorded on the intertidal sand flat.
Despite the close distance to the sandflat, construction of the pumping
stations and the section of sewer alignment between them would take place on
already urbanised area only. Considering the scale of the construction work and
providing good site management practices being followed, no impact on the
horseshoe crabs from site runoff would be expected. Provision of the sewer
system would produce positive impacts on intertidal ecology on the sand flat by
reducing the wastewater input to the sand flat.
Subtidal Ecology
8.122
This section of the report considers
the potential impacts of project construction on subtidal ecology.
8.123
Potential sources of impact include:
·
Habitat loss from dredging;
·
Suspended solid from dredging;
·
Drilling fluid;
·
Site runoff;
·
Construction dust; and
·
Noise and disturbance.
Habitat loss from dredging
8.124
Technique of Horizontal Directional
Drilling (HDD) would be used for
the section of sewer between the intertidal zone and 480m away from the
coastline. Application of this technique avoids the disturbance on coral
habitats caused by traditional dredging The only potential impact on corals
would be a temporary steel working platform of size 15m wide by 25m long, which
would be erected close to the tide line. The platform would cause a temporary
loss of 375 m2 intertidal and shallow subtidal area. According to
Figure A8.5-1 in Appendix 8.5 of this chapter, the distribution extent of coral
colonies would not be encroached by the platform. Its seaward limit would lie
before the landward boundary of Zone 1 in Figure A8.5-1. A barge would be used during the HDD works. As
confirmed by the engineer, the barge would only be operated around 400-500m
away from the coast where the HDD pipe is about to break the seabed. No impact on coral colonies
from the HDD works is anticipated.
8.125
A temporary seabed loss due to the
dredging at the remaining 240m pipeline and diffuser site would be caused. The
majority of the temporary seabed loss area is of muddy substrate, with no
special ecological value. The impact of the temporary loss of soft seabed
caused by dredging is thus ranked as minor. Permanent seabed loss would not
result after the construction works are completed as the pipeline and diffuser
would be located below the seabed.
Suspended solid from dredging
8.126
Suspended solids created in dredging
would increase the turbidity of the waters, which could bury sessile organisms,
and thus reduce the amount of light reaching the sea bed. Furthermore, those
suspended solids might settle on the surface of corals, further reduce the
amount of light available to corals and also disturb the active feeding
activities of corals. Resuspension of sediments would also reduce oxygen levels
and potentially release pollutants into the water column. All these consequences may affect the health
and survival of corals. These impacts, short-term and localised in nature,
however, would not be expected being significant to the subtidal ecology of Sok
Kwu Wan, especially hard corals, due to the long distance of the dredging area
from the coastline (480m) and the application of double –layered silt curtain around the
dredging site
and a dredging rate of not greater than 55 m3/hr. Water quality
assessment also showed that the suspended solid level would match the Water
Quality Objectives inside the nearest Fish Culture Zone (224 m away from the
alignment) during the construction phase. The hard coral colonies recorded in
the dive survey of 2002 were located further away from the dredging site than
the FCZ was. Impacts of suspended solid increase on corals is thus not
anticipated. Other marine fauna in the vicinity include three Pteroeides
sp. (sea pens) observed in Site 1 (Outfall Option 1) during 1998 dive
survey. Though they were located more seawards than the coral colonies were,
and thus closer to the dredging site, this animal inhabits soft substrate
habitat and can tolerate change in suspended solid level.
Release of contaminants
from dredging
8.127
During dredging, contaminants such as
heavy metals and other toxic substances would be released from sediment when
seabed was disturbed. The potential for
adverse effects on water quality through mobilization and release of
contaminants into the surrounding water column during dredging would depend on
the level of contamination of the marine sediment. As part of the projectProject, a sediment sampling and testing
survey within the Study Area was undertaken to provide an indication of the
sediment quality for the purpose of this EIA Study.
8.128
Since the sediment testing results
showed that marine sediments to be dredged for the proposed submarine outfall
were classified as Category L and no exceedance of the respective LCELs were
recorded (Section 6 refers), the potential impact of contaminants released from
the sediments would be of minimal. The predicted nutrient levels including
unionised ammonia would be well below the WQO during the dredging activities
(see ssSection 5). In other words, the potential release of
metals, organics and nutrients from sediment into the water column would not
result in adverse impacts on water quality during the dredging works.
Drilling fluid
8.129
The drilling process of the HDD
technique would require drilling fluid, which would be a mixture of water and
specialized additives. According to the
information provided by the Contractor, the drilling fluid (Bentonite fluid)
that would be used for the drilling process is environmentally friendly and
without dangerous contaminants, and is extensively used in Europe as well as
America for both HDD and water well applications. The used drilling fluid (slurry) would be circulated back to the
ground surface and collected in return pits for recycling or disposal. Discharge of the slurry to the bay would
only occur when the drill breaks the ground at around 480m from the coast. However, the discharge of slurry would occur
in the short term. With the deployment
of silt curtains around the exit area as stated in Appendix 2.1, adverse water
quality impact associated with the discharge of the slurry during breaking the
ground would not be anticipated. No ecological impact is anticipated.
Site Runoff
8.130
Construction site runoff can contain
sediments, organic substances, oil, grease and solvents that can affect marine
ecology. These substances can increase
turbidity, decrease oxygen levels and introduce contaminants, potentially
injuring or killing sessile benthic organisms and driving mobile
organisms away from the vicinity and thereby causing a short-term loss of
habitat or degradation of habitat quality.
8.131
Impacts would be short-term and would
be largely self–corrected after project completion without active restoration
efforts. Sensitive species near the
site that could be directly affected by runoff would include juvenile life
stages of various marine organisms. The
impacts of such runoff would be ranked as minimal as the sewer pipe would be
laid along the existing footpath and does not require construction directly
along the coastline.
Construction Dust
8.132
Dust from the construction areas could
settle over nearby waters, increasing turbidity and possibly introducing
contaminants into the marine environment.
Providing good site management practices are followed, dust should not
settle offsite and is not predicted to reach natural habitats in measurable
quantities. Impacts would not be
predicted to have direct impacts upon species of high conservation
importance. Any dust impacts would
therefore be negligible and ranked as minimal.
Noise and Disturbance
8.133
Noise and disturbance from underwater
and coastal construction including dredging activities could cause
disturbance-sensitive marine fauna to migrate from the area, or cause secondary
effects such as reduced feeding efficiency.
However, mobile fauna which are sensitive to disturbance would most
likely have vacated the area earlier during the course of the dredging. Impacts would therefore be ranked as minor.
Summary of Construction Impacts
8.134
The area is considered to be of some
conservation interest due to:
·
The location of potential country
parks; and
·
the existence of corals in the
vicinity of the study areas;
8.135
Construction of the sewage treatment
project in Sok Kwu Wan at Lamma would cause little disturbance to terrestrial
and intertidal environments but would cause larger impacts on the subtidal
environment.
8.136
Impacts on intertidal habitats would
not occur on the sand flat and would occur in only a limited area on the rocky
shore. Construction of a subtidal
outfall would involve a temporary seabed loss of 10,400 m2. Since
the seabed loss area is away from shallow subtidal zone and of muddy substrate,
no hard corals would be directly impacted by the dredging work, and the seabed
which is available for hard coral colonization would not be affected. Given the distance and the application of silt curtain, indirect
impacts from suspended solids during dredging would not be expected.
8.137
The sewer alignment mostly lies
underground along the existing footpath and the pumping stations are located in
urbanised areas. Ecological disturbance is therefore expected to be
minimal. In addition, the disturbance
to the natural coastline would be limited to the outfall location and is also
expected to be minimal.
8.138
The Alternative STW site is located on
a disused quarry which is sparsely vegetated.
8.139
Potential ecological impacts of
project construction are summarised in the following table. The overall impacts
of project construction on ecology are predicted to be minor.
Table 8.1315 Construction-stage Impacts
Potential Impacts
|
Location
|
Source of impact
|
Receiver
|
Severity
|
Mitigation Required
|
Habitat loss
|
Terrestrial
|
Construction
of sewer pipeline
|
Encroachment
from construction works
|
Shrubland-grassland
habitat on hillside
|
Minor
|
No
|
Damage of
tree roots or trunks
|
Rare and
restricted tree species
|
Minor to
moderate
|
Fencing of
the trees. (detailed in below sections)
|
Construction
of STW
|
Encroachment
from construction works
|
Shrubland-grassland
habitat in disused quarry
|
Minimal to
minor
|
No
|
Construction
of sewer pipeline and STW
|
Loss of
feeding ground
|
Avifauna
|
Minor
|
No
|
Non avifauna
|
Minor
|
No
|
Intertidal
|
Construction
of sewer pipeline
|
Loss of
intertidal habitats
|
Intertidal
fauna
|
Minimal
|
No
|
Platform for
HDD
|
Supporting
piles of the platform
|
Corals
|
No impact
|
No
|
Other marine
organisms
|
Minor
|
No
|
Subtidal
|
Construction
of submarine outfall pipeline
|
HDD
technique
|
Corals
|
No impact
|
No
|
Dredging for
diffuser
|
Loss of soft
-bottom seabed
|
Benthic
organisms
|
Minor
|
No
|
Construction
dust
|
Terrestrial
|
Inhibition
of vegetation growth and pollution of waterbodies
|
Adjacent
terrestrial habitats
|
Minimal
|
No
|
Subtidal
|
Increase of
turbidity of nearby coastal waters
|
Adjacent
marine habitats
|
Minimal
|
No
|
Noise and
Disturbance
|
Terrestrial,
intertidal and subtidal
|
Changes in
distribution, activity patterns or breeding success
|
Disturbance-
sensitive wildlife species on and near the site
|
Minimal
|
No
|
Site runoff
|
Terrestrial
|
Deterioration of habitat
quality
|
Romer’s Tree Frog site
|
Minimal*
|
Good site
practices (detailed in below sections)
(*Barriers in Pumping Station P2 site.
Additional measures for Romer’s Tree Frog site though the impact is minimal.)
|
Intertidal
|
Decrease
water quality; bury and suffocate sessile organisms
|
Intertidal
habitats
|
Minor
|
Sandflat
|
No impact
|
Subtidal
|
Decrease
water quality; bury and suffocate sessile organisms; drive away mobile
organisms
|
Adjacent
marine habitats and dependent species
|
Minimal
|
Suspended
solid
|
Subtidal
|
Decrease
water quality; bury and suffocate sessile organisms; drive away mobile
organisms
|
corals
|
No impact
|
Silt
curtains and closed grab dredging are proposed in Section 5 of this report.
|
Contaminants
|
Subtidal
|
Effects on
water quality
|
Marine
organisms
|
No impact
|
Silt
curtains and closed grab dredging are proposed in Section 5 of this report.
|
Drilling fluid
|
Subtidal
|
Effects on
water quality
|
Marine
organisms
|
No impact
|
Silt
curtains is proposed in Section 5 of this report.
|
Operation Stage
Terrestrial Ecology
8.140
Potential sources of impact of project
operation on terrestrial ecology include:
·
Noise and disturbance
8.141 Operation of the sewer and STW facilities is not expected to
generate significant levels of noise.
Impacts on disturbance-sensitive wildlife (e.g.,
Reef Egret, Crested Goshawk) are unlikely to be
detectable and at most would be minimal.
Intertidal Ecology
8.142
No impact on intertidal habitats would
be expected from the operation of the sewer system.
Subtidal Ecology
8.143
This section of the report considers
the potential impacts of project operation on marine ecology. Potential sources of impact include:
·
Maintenance of outfall
·
Marine water quality
·
Emergency discharge
8.144
Maintenance dredging for submarine
outfalls is not required as it might cause damage to the underlying pipeline.
Instead, the diffusers of the outfalls might need to undergo cleaning operations
in the case of blockage. This operation, however, would not involve dredging.
So the impacts form repair and maintenance would be expected being minimal to
the subtidal ecology of Sok Kwu Wan.
8.145
Installation of a sewerage system and
a STW system would vastly improve the level of treatment currently available in
this area. The current direct discharge of untreated waste water into inner Sok
Kwu Wan would be replaced by an outward and deep water discharge of treated
sewage. This would be considered as a positive impact which may outweigh the
potential negative impacts of the projectProject on
marine ecology.
Marine water quality
8.1
Exceedances of WQO limit
for TIN are predicted during the normal operation of the sewerage system. The only discharge parameter that would exceed WQO limits, despite
minor, is Total Inorganic Nitrogen (TIN). However, the exceedances are
attributable to the high background TIN levels. Since the background
TIN levels of the area are close to or have already breached the WQO limit, the exceedances
would be unavoidable even with a very small contribution from the treated
effluent discharge. The elevated TIN levels due to the submarine outfall
discharge would fall within the current background variations of TIN
concentrations (from
0.1 to 0.3 mg/l) at Picnic Bay.
8.1
8.146
The predicted TIN
levels, however, were considered to be over-estimated as they were calculated
by adding the elevated TIN levels directly to the measured background TIN
levels. The prediction was not taken
account of the beneficial effect of eliminating untreated or partially treated
sewage discharges to the Picnic Bay upon the operation of the proposed projectProject (see Section 5.63). The proposed system would collect and transfer sewage from the
Sok Kwu Wan area to the proposed STW for treatment and would discharge treated
sewage at a long submarine outfall of around 750 m from the coast. Having considered the high background TIN
level, the treatment process of the STW would include denitrification in order
to reduce the potential water quality impact in relation to TIN. With the denitrification applied, more than
50% reduction in TIN level would be achieved after treatment. In addition, the system would discharge the
treated effluent through the submarine outfall at a location 750m from the
coastline in where dilution and dispersion effect would be more efficient and
fast, instead of discharges of untreated or partially treated sewage along the
coastline of Sok Kwu Wan, accumulates in the inner Picnic Bay, and slowly
disperses toward the open sea, as the existing situation. As such, the
potential water quality impact in relation to TIN levels on the marine
organisms, would not be expected to be worse than the existing conditions.
8.147
Compared with the current situation
that TIN source discharges on the coastline, the situation after the proposed projectProject
implemented would not be expected to cause significant adverse effect on marine
organisms, including corals, in shallow subtidal zone. The impact is thus ranked
as minimal.
Emergency discharge
8.148
The emergency discharge from the
pumping stations and STW may be the consequence of pump failure or interruption
of the electrical power supply. Water quality impact arising from the emergency
discharge of the pumping stations and STW are anticipated.
8.149
As detailed in the Section 5 of this
report, sufficient preventive measures would be provided. Standby pumps,
standby generators, temporary storage space for sewage, and action plan would
be prepared. The provision of those measures would prevent the failure of the
system and the resulted sewage overflow and emergency discharge. Though the
chance is remote, in an extreme case that all the measures fail, contingency
plan would be implemented to minimize the water quality impact at the inner
part of Picnic Bay and the shallow subtidal zone.
8.150
With the implementation of the
above-mentioned mitigation measures and contingencies, the possibility of an
emergency overflow occurring and the potential water quality impacts would be
minimised. The key aspects of the
recommendations are summarised as follows:
·
Standby pump at all pumping stations
and the STW in case of pump failure;
·
Standby generator at all pumping
stations in case of interruption of electrical power supply;
·
24-hour temporary storage for all
pumping stations in emergency;
·
Use of SBR units as storage tanks in
case STW failure;
·
No emergency discharge is allowed at
Pumping Station P2 and the STW;
·
Automatically shutdown the pumping
station at Lo So Shing in case of Pumping Station P1a failure;
·
Automatically shutdown the upstream
pumping stations in case of Pumping Station P1b failure;
·
Automatically shutdown the upstream
pumping stations in case of Pumping Station P2 failure;
·
Automatically shutdown all pumping
stations in case of STW failure;
·
Implement a telemetry system to ensure
prompt action to be undertaken in an emergency occasion.
8.151
It should be noted that the occurrence
of emergency discharge would be episodic and very short-termed. Compared with
the long-termed improvement of water quality inside Picnic Bay from the
proposed projectProject, and given the above-mentioned
measures to prevent and minimize the emergency discharge, the impact is ranked
as minimal.
Summary of Operational Impacts
8.152
The potential ecological impacts of
project operation are summarised in the following table.
Table 8.1416 Operation-stage Impacts
Potential Impacts
|
Location
|
Source of impact
|
|
Receiver
|
Severity
|
Mitigation Required
|
Noise and
disturbance
|
Terrestrial
|
Noise and
disturbance
|
Changes in
distribution, activity patterns or breeding success
|
Disturbance-sensitive
wildlife species on and near the site
|
Minimal
|
No
|
Subtidal
|
Maintenance
|
Disturbance
|
Adjacent
marine habitats and dependant species
|
Minimal
|
No
|
Marine water
quality
|
Subtidal
|
STW
operation
|
Marked
improvement in water quality
|
Sok Kwu Wan
bay ecology
|
Positive
effects
|
N/A
|
Marine water
quality
|
TIN level
would exceed WQO, but within the range of current background variation.
|
Adjacent
marine habitats and dependant species
|
Minimal
|
No
|
Emergency
discharge
|
Episodic
marine water quality impact
|
Adjacent
marine habitats and dependant species
|
Minimal
|
Provided in
Section 5 of this report.
|
Cumulative
Impacts
8.153
Three recognised sites
of marine conservation interest are located near the study area, i.e. the waters to the west of Ha
Mei Wan and of the northern part of Tung O Bay; the coastal waters of south
Lamma; Sham Wan and (Figure 8.1). The waters to the west of Ha Mei Wan and of
the northern part of Tung O Bay were identified in the Territorial Development
Strategy Review as a ‘Significant Area’ for Marine Conservation (PELB 1998).
Identified as a ‘Unique Area’ for Marine Conservation (PELB 1998), the coastal
waters of south Lamma are also a proposed Marine Park. The proposed South Lamma Marine Park would
cover the waters south of Lo So Shing Beach, along the coastline of south
Lamma, including Sham Wan, to the north boundary of Shek Pai Wan. An area of 4
hectares including the sandy beach and the adjacent shallow shore in Sham Wan
was designated as
an SSSI on 3 June 1999. This area has also been identified as important for
Green Turtle Chelonia mydas
nesting (Morton 1998) and gazetted as a
Restricted Area under the Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap. 170) for
green turtles in 1999.
8.154
These three areas,
however, are all sheltered from Sok Kwu Wan by the landmass of Lamma Island. As
the water quality modelling results has indicated that most parameters would be
within the WQO standard. Only TIN would marginally exceed the WQO and the exceedances could be
attributed to the high background level. The change of water quality during the
operation phase of the present projectProject would be acceptable for water quality
sensitive receivers inside Picnic Bay. Outside the bay, the currents in Lamma channel would
further facilitate the dilution process. The change in water quality would thus
be undetectable. No adverse impacts on all these recognised sites of marine
conservation interest would be anticipated.
8.155
The construction of the
STW, sewer alignment,
and outfall must be considered in the context of its surroundings. The current main contributors to impacts to
marine ecology within Sok Kwu Wan are the Far East Cement operations and the
mariculture trade. Therefore,
cumulative impact arising from
projectProjects concurrent with the construction activities
for the present projectProject is expected to be minimal. In addition, the impact to the marine
ecology has been reduced by selection of the Alternative STW site, which is
located in a disused
quarry to the southeast of the RTS.
Operation of the STW would further improve water quality in Sok Kwu Wan,
helping to offset negative effects of mariculture operations.
8.156
The TM (Annex 16) and
the TC require
that mitigation of ecological impacts be sought in the following order of
priority: (1) avoid, (2) minimise, (3) compensate on-site and (4) compensate
off-site. At each stage, residual
impacts should be re-assessed to determine whether there is a need to proceed to the next
stage of mitigation. The following
measures are proposed to mitigate the impacts discussed in the preceding
sections.
Construction Stage
Terrestrial Ecology
8.157
The two uncommon
tree species would be labelled and probably fenced to avoid direct or indirect disturbance during
construction. Works areas should avoid
woodland habitats, in particular where these trees are located. Construction and maintenance of site runoff
control measures would be required at all work sites during construction. These should
include barriers to direct runoff to sand/silt removal facilities
(sand/silt/traps and/or sediment basins); minimisation of earthworks during
rainy season (May to September); and coverage of sand/fill piles and exposed
earth during storms. Special attention should be paid during the
breeding season of
Romer’s Tree Frog (March to September) to ensure their habitat landward to Pumping Station P2 site is
well protected from site runoff. Barriers should be deployed completely along the landward side of the
pumping station site boundary to prevent any site runoff from entering the tree
frog habitat. Intactness of the barriers
should be frequently inspected. No other
mitigation is required for impacts to terrestrial ecology.
Intertidal Ecology
8.158
No mitigation is required for
impacts to intertidal ecology.Construction and maintenance of site runoff control
measures would be required at all work sites during construction. These should
include barriers to direct runoff to sand/silt removal facilities
(sand/silt/traps and/or sediment basins); minimisation of earthworks during
rainy season (May to September); and coverage of sand/fill piles and exposed
earth during storms.
Subtidal Ecology
8.159
Due to the application of HDD
technique, no coral colonies would be directly affected by the construction
works. Mitigation measures for direct impacts on coral colonies such as
Translocation Plan is thus not considered necessary. As the drilling would be conducted 10m below seabed
level and the
majority of coral colonies are colonised on boulders, indirect impacts from vibration during the drilling would not
be anticipated. Information provided by the Engineer showed that over 80 samples of this method were found during 1998 - 2001 at
different locations of the world in a variety of substrate types (from soft soil to hard
rock). No adverse effects were found
in all these
cases. Based upon
these previous examples and the details of the technique as described above, HDD technique would be safe for marine organisms. No need for an ecological
monitoring programme is anticipated.
8.160
To reduce impacts of sediment
resuspension upon nearby habitats and organisms during dredging, all dredging
should be done using a closed-grab dredger, and silt curtains should be
deployed around the dredger during all dredging activity.
8.161
Construction and maintenance of site
runoff control measures would be required at all work sites during
construction. These should include barriers to direct runoff to sand/silt
removal facilities (sand/silt/traps and/or sediment basins); use of silt
curtains along coastline; minimisation of earthworks during rainy season (May
to September); and coverage of sand/fill piles and exposed earth during storms.
8.162
Contaminants from
dredging and drilling fluid are considered as having no ecological impact. Silt
curtains, however, could further prevent their release into the water bodies.
Summary of Construction-stage Mitigation Measures
8.163
The mitigation measures proposed above
are summarised in the following table.
Table 8.1517 Proposed Construction-stage Mitigation
Measures
Source of Impact
|
Proposed Mitigation
|
Predicted Degree of
Residual Impact
|
Habitat loss
|
·
Labeling
and fencing of the uncommon tree
species
· Avoidance of use of woodland habitats as
Works Area, in particular where these trees are located
|
Acceptable
|
Site runoff
|
·
Construction
and maintenance of sand/silt removal facilities
· Timing of earthworks
· Coverage of sand/fill piles during storms
·
Barriers should be deployed
completely along the landward side of Pumping Station P2 site boundary.
Intactness of the barriers should be frequently inspected. Special attention should
be paid during March to September.
|
Acceptable
|
Suspended
solid
|
·
Use of
closed-grab dredging
Deploy silt
curtains during dredging
|
Acceptable
|
Contaminants
& Drilling fluid
|
·
Silt
curtains
|
Acceptable
|
Operation Stage
8.164
No dredging would be involved for
maintenance of outfall, and the TIN exceedence would be within the range of
current background variation, no mitigation measures in operation stage are
required. Measures to address emergency discharge are provided in Section 5 of
this report.
8.165
With the implementation of the
mitigation measures recommended, residual ecological impacts may include net
loss of grassland habitat and intertidal habitat, are
not expected to be significant.
8.166
Due to the limited scale of the projectProject, the low ecological value of the fauna and
flora recorded, and the minor degree
of impacts caused, and
also the previous
records of HDD
technique as
mentioned in Section 8.15960 above, no need for an ecological
monitoring programme is anticipated. nNo ecological monitoring and audit is
proposed.
Ades, G.W.J. 1999. The species composition, distribution and
population size of Hong Kong bats. Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History
Society 22: 183-209.
Anon. 1995. Wildlife Windows Two. Porcupine! Number 12. Newsletter of the Department of Ecology and
Biodiversity, Hong Kong University.
Anon. 1996. Wildlife Windows. Three. p. 23.
Porcupine! Number 15. Newsletter
of the Department of Ecology and Biodiversity, Hong Kong University.
Anon. 1997.
Wildlife Windows. Two. p.
25. Porcupine! Number 16. Newsletter of the Department of Ecology and
Biodiversity, Hong Kong University.
Anon. 1998.
Wildlife Windows. Two. p.
24. Porcupine! Number 17. Newsletter of the Department of Ecology and
Biodiversity, Hong Kong University.
Ashworth,
J.M., R.T. Corlett, D. Dudgeon, D.S. Melville, and W.S.M. Tang. 1993.
Hong Kong Flora and Fauna: Computing Conservation. World Wide Fund for Nature Hong Kong. November 1993.
Binnie
Consultants Ltd. 1993. Fill Management Study (Phase 11). Investigation and Development of Marine
Burrow Areas. East Lamma Channel Borrow
Area. Report submitted to Civil Engineering Department, Hong Kong Government.
Binnie
Consultants Ltd. 1995. Marine Ecology of Hong Kong: Report on Underwater Dive Surveys (October 1991 - November 1994).
Report submitted to Civil Engineering Department, Hong Kong Government.
Carey, G. 1993.
Hong Kong Bird Report 1992. Hong
Kong Bird Watching Society, Hong Kong.
Carey, G. 1994.
Hong Kong Bird Report 1993. Hong
Kong Bird Watching Society, Hong Kong.
Carey, G. 1995.
Hong Kong Bird Report 1994. Hong
Kong Bird Watching Society, Hong Kong.
Carey, G. 1996.
Hong Kong Bird Report 1995. Hong
Kong Bird Watching Society, Hong Kong.
Carey, G. 1998.
Hong Kong Bird Report 1996. Hong
Kong Bird Watching Society, Hong Kong.
Carey, G. J.,
Chalmers, M. L., Diskin, D. A., Kennerley, P. R., Leader, P. J., Leven, M. R.,
Lewthwaite, R. W., Melville, D. S., Turnbull, M. and Young, L. 2001.
The Avifauna of Hong Kong. Hong
Kong Bird Watching Society, Hong Kong.
Chiu, H.M.C.
and B. Morton. 1999. The distribution of horseshoe crabs (Tachypleus tridentatus and Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda) in Hong Kong. Asian Marine Biology. vol.
16(1999), pp. 185-196.
Corlett, R. T. 2001. Is Javan Mongoose
native and does it matter? Porcupine! 24: 19.
Halcrow China Limited. 2002. 10 Year Extended LPM
Project Phase 2, Package G – Outlying Islands Features IN Sok Kwu Wan, Lamma Island
Project Profile.
Karsen, S. J.,
Lau, M. W. N. and Bogadek, A.
1998. Hong Kong Amphibians and
Reptiles. Second edition. Urban Council, Hong Kong.
Lau, M. W. N. and Dudgeon, D. 1999.
Composition and distribution of Hong Kong Amphibian fauna. Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History
Society 22: 1-80.
Leven, M.
R. 2000. Shrubland Birds in Hong Kong: Community Structure, Seasonality
and Diet. Unpubl. PhD thesis,
University of Hong Kong.
Maunsell 1997.
Outlying Islands Sewerage – Stage I Phase I. Report submitted to Drainage
Services Department.
McGilvray, F.
and Geermans, S. 1997. The status of the Green Turtle in Hong Kong
and an action plan for its survival.
The Hong Kong Marine conservation Society.
Morton, B.
1998. Hong Kong’s Marine Parks Ordinance and designation of the first marine
parks and reserves: where next? In The Marine Biology of the South China Sea
III. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the Marine Biology of
the South China Sea, Hong Kong, 28 October- 1 November 1996. (ed. Brian Morton)
p.541-562. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong.
Morton, B. and
Morton, J. 1983. The Sea Shore Ecology of Hong Kong. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong.
Planning
Department 1993. Terrestrial Development Strategy Review: Environmental
BaselineConditions.
Planning
Department 1995. The Final Technical Report on Territorial Development Strategy
Review, 1995: A New Development Framework for Hong Kong – A Response to Change
and Challenges – Part Two : The Study Process and Inputs for Strategy
Formulation.
Planning,
Environment and Lands Bureau 1998. Terrestrial Development Strategy Review: A Response
to Change and Challenges. Final Executive Report.
Viney, C.,
Phillipps, K. & Lam, C. Y. 1996. Birds of Hong Kong and South China.
Government Printer, Hong Kong.
Walthew,
G. 1997. The status and flight periods of Hong Kong butterflies. Porcupine! No. 16: 34-37.
Wilson D. E.
and Reeder, D. M. 1992. Mammal species of the world: A taxonomic and
geographic reference. Smithsonian
Institution Press, Washington & London.
Wilson,
K.D.P. 1995. Hong Kong Dragonflies.
Urban Council of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Wilson, K. D.
P. 1997. An annotated checklist of the Hong Kong dragonflies with
recommendations for their conservation.
Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society 21: 1-68.
Xing, F. W.,
S.C. Ng, and L.K.C. Chau 2000. Gymnosperms and angiosperms of Hong Kong.
Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society. 23: 21-136.
Zhao, E. M.
1998. China Red Data Book of
Endangered Animals: Amphibia & Reptiia.
Science Press, Beijing.
Zheng, G. M.
and Wang, Q. S. 1998. China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals:
Aves. Science Press, Beijing.