7                     LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

 

Introduction

 

7.1               This Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) covers the proposed Atrium Link Extension of Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre (HKCEC) in Wan Chai North. The project proponent is Hong Kong Trade Development Council (TDC).  This section assesses the potential landscape and visual impact due to the construction and operation of the proposed work in accordance with the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO).

 

7.2               Existing HKCEC consists of three major components, i.e., Phase 1, Phase 2 and the Atrium Link found in between these Phases.  Phase 1 is commonly known as “Old Wing” while Phase 2 as “New Wing”.  Local people of Hong Kong are more familiar with these terms and this LVIA will use them to serve better communication.

 

Project Description

 

7.3               Figure 7.1 shows an existing aerial view of HKCEC in Wan Chai North and the developments along the waterfront of Victoria Harbour.  The existing HKCEC Atrium Link joins up the “New Wing” and the “Old Wing”. The proposed works involve the expansion of the existing Exhibition Halls to provide additional floor spaces to accommodate large-scale events. Figures in Appendix 7.1 show the master layout and architectural design of the proposed works.  Full description and justification on the need on the extension project is provided in Section 2 of this EIA report.

 

Review of Planning and Development Control Framework

 

7.4               A review of the existing and planned development framework for the proposed works and for the surroundings has been considered. It aims to identify issues for the neighbouring planned land uses, to identify potential resources and sensitive receivers, and to ensure a high compatibility between the proposed project and the surroundings.

 

7.5               Wan Chai North Outline Zoning Plan (OZP) No. S/H25/1 has been examined.  The area near the waterfront is dominated by patches of Other Specified Use (OU), suggesting the sensitive nature and planning of the area.  The Plan shows possible developments, including the provision of Open Spaces (O) to the east and to the west of the existing HKCEC “New Wing”.  It also shows the proposed relocation of Wan Chai Ferry Pier and the planning of a large Comprehensive Development Area (CDA) on the existing bus terminal to the south of Wan Chai Ferry Pier.  Although the Plan has been made statutory under the Town Planning Ordinance, it shall by no means be considered a consolidated plan due to the strong public criticisms and juridical reviews in recent years.  Intended land use pattern extracted from the Plan is shown on Figure 7.2.

 

7.6               The existing area of HKCEC Atrium Link has been zoned as OU.  Part of the proposed Atrium Link Extension falls within the area designated as ‘Road’ on the Wai Chai North OZP which requires planning permission from the Town Planning Board (TPB) according to Section 16 of the Town Planning Ordinance.  An application to TPB has already been approved earlier to expand the area to suit the intended Atrium Link Extension.

 

7.7               Major waterfront development projects have been previously planned along the waterfront near Wan Chai, including:

-           Wan Chai Development Phase II (WDII)   

-           Central Wan Chai Bypass (CWB) and Road P2

 

These projects are somewhat interlinked because they require a prerequisite of consolidated planning of reclamation from Central to Causeway Bay.  With strong objection on reclamation and support for harbour protection from the public in recent years, these developments are still under review by the authorities.  There is some chance that these developments will not be constructed after several years, when the construction of the proposed HKCEC Atrium Link Extension is already completed.  Nevertheless, this report takes the approach on what has been already planned by the Government years ago, assuming the construction of these developments commences when the proposed ALE is nearly completed.

 

Environmental Legislation and Standards

 

7.8               The followings are considered:

·             Wan Chai North Outline Zoning Plan (OZP) No. S/H25/1 and the Town Planning Ordinance

·             Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance, Annexes 10 and 18 of Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) Technical Memorandum and EIAO Guidance Note No. 8/2002.

·             Protection of the Harbour Ordinance

·             Metroplan (Oct 1991)

·             Central & Wan Chai Reclamation : Development of Urban Design Parameters (DUDPS)

·             Hong Kong Island West Development Statement (HKWDS)

·             Government General Regulation 740 –sets out restrictions on the preservation and felling of trees in Hong Kong

·             ETWBTC No. 29/2004 Registration of Old and Valuable Trees and Guidelines for their Preservation – provides priority protection to the trees in the Register.  Furthermore, the Government has already put in place a comprehensive range of administrative and legislative measures to preserve trees on Government land.

·             ETWBTC No. 2/2004 Maintenance of Vegetation and Hard Landscape Features – sets out the government departmental responsibilities for maintenance of vegetation and hard landscape features.

·             ETWBTC No. 14/2002 Management and Maintenance of Natural Vegetation and Landscape Works, and Tree Preservation – defines and outlines the management and maintenance responsibilities for natural vegetation and landscape works, and the authorities for tree preservation and felling.

·             ETWBTC No. 7/2002 Tree planting in Public Works – affirms the advocated policy on tree planting which adopts a flexible and balanced approach in the planning and design of public works.

·             Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines, Section 4:  Recreation, Open Space and Greening and Section 11:  Urban Design Guidelines – outlines the guidelines to be considered for open space design, greening and urban design.

·             Technical Reports of Landscape Value Mapping in Hong Kong by Planning Department – establishes the essential landscape baseline information which provides a systematic reference framework to facilitate landscape assessment and broad environmental assessment of major projects at territorial level.

Methodology of Assessment of Landscape Impacts

 

7.9               The assessment of landscape impacts has adopted the following process:

·             Identification of the baseline Landscape Resources (LR) and Landscape Character Area (LCA) found within the study boundary defined by EPD’s Study Brief.  This was firstly prepared by desktop research study on aerial photos and topographical maps, then by site visits and photo-retaking for verification.

·             Assessment of “Sensitivity to Change” to the LR and LCA.  This is affected by factors including:  (i) whether the resource is common or rare; (ii) whether it is considered to be of local, regional, national or global importance; (iii) whether there are any statutory or regulatory limitations / requirements relating to the resource; (iv) the quality of the resource; (v) the maturity of the resource, and (vi) the ability of the resource to accommodate changes. The sensitivity of each LR and LCA is separated into construction phase and operation phase. The rating is classified as below:

High:        Important LR or LCA of particularly distinctive characteristics or high importance, and is sensitive to relatively small changes

Medium:  LR or LCA of moderate landscape characteristics and value, and is reasonably tolerant to change

Low:        LR or LCA with low landscape characteristics and value, and is largely tolerant to change

·             Assessment of “Magnitude of Change” for landscape impacts.  This is affected by factors including:  (i) the physical extent of impact; (ii) the landscape context of impact and (iii) the time-scale of impact, such as whether it is temporary (short, medium or long term), permanent with reversible potentials, or irreversibly permanent.  Magnitude of Change is separately considered for construction phase and operation phase.  For operation phase, it is further divided into a scenario with all adjacent waterfront developments (i.e., Road P2, WDII etc.) to be constructed and another scenario without these developments.  The assessment for these scenarios, however, still refers to the magnitude of change arisen from the operation of the proposed Atrium Link Extension itself with all these developments in the background/ context.  The rating for “Magnitude of Change” is classified as below:

Large:                  LR or LCA will suffer a major change.

Intermediate:       LR or LCA will suffer a moderate change.

Small:                  LR or LCA will suffer a barely perceptible change.

Negligible:           LR or LCA will suffer no discernible change.

·             Assessment of the “Impact Significance Threshold Before Mitigation” for landscape impacts.  The assessment of landscape impacts during construction, during operation with or without all adjacent waterfront developments is produced by synthesizing the “Sensitivity to Change” and “Magnitude of Change” for various LR and LCA according to Table 7.1.  The degree of significance is divided into four thresholds, depending on the combination:

Substantial:         Adverse / beneficial impact where the proposal will cause significant deterioration or improvement in existing landscape quality

Moderate:            Adverse / beneficial impact where the proposal will cause a noticeable deterioration or improvement in existing landscape quality

Slight:                  Adverse / beneficial impact where the proposal will cause barely perceptible deterioration or improvement in existing landscape quality

Insubstantial:       No discernible change in the existing landscape quality

Table 7.1      Matrix for Impact Significance Threshold Before Mitigation: Relationship between Sensitivity to Change and Magnitude of Change

 

Sensitivity

To Change

Magnitude

of Change

Low

Medium

High

Large

Moderate

Moderate/Substantial

Substantial

Intermediate

Slight/Moderate

Moderate

Moderate/Substantial

Small

Insubstantial /Slight

Slight/Moderate

Moderate

Negligible

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Note:  All identified impact shall mean adverse impact, unless otherwise specified.

·             Identification of potential Mitigation Measures.  This part is also separated into construction phase and operation phase, with proposing measures for preventing or minimizing unavoidable adverse impacts and / or generating beneficial long-term impacts.  A table for the mitigation measures is provided.  The agencies responsible for the funding/ implementation and management/ maintenance of the mitigation measures are also identified.

·             Identification of “Residual Impact Significance Threshold After Mitigation” for landscape impacts.  This part indicates the accumulative influence to LR and LCA after applying mitigation measures, with an assumption that all proposed measures and guidelines will be fully implemented.  Like the “Impact Significance Before Mitigation”, the rating has been divided into the construction phase and operation phase.

Methodology of Assessment of Visual Impacts

 

7.10            The assessment of visual impacts has adopted the following process:

·             Identification of Zones of Visual Influence (ZVI) and Visually Sensitive Receivers Groups (VSRs) during construction and during operation. A ZVI has been established by a desktop study of topographic maps, street maps, photographs and site visits to determine the possible VSRs in the Harbour area.

·             Assessment of the “Sensitivity to change” of the VSRs.  Factors include:

-          The type of VSRs, such as viewers who are hotel guests, workers, road travellers or recreation engagers.  Those people viewing from the hotels are considered to be highly sensitive because the view directly affects their general quality of daily life during their stay there.  Those people viewing from their workplace are considered to be only moderately sensitive as it is less important factor for their quality of life. The degree however depends on whether the workplace is industrial, retail or commercial.  Those people who take part in outdoor leisure activity may have varying sensitivity depending on the type of recreation.  Those people who are travelling on roads or streets will also have varying sensitivity depending on the speed of travel.

-          Population of viewers.  This is to consider the overall population of viewers in the VSRs.

-          Other factors to be considered (as required by EIAO GN 8/2002) include the value and quality of existing views, the availability and amenity of alternative views, the duration and frequency of view, and the degree of visibility.

7.11            “Sensitivity to change” of the VSRs is divided into construction phase and operation phase, with rating classified as below:

High:        The VSR is highly sensitive to any change in their viewing experience.

Medium:  The VSR is moderately sensitive to any change in their viewing experience.

Low:        The VSR is only slightly sensitive to any change in their viewing experience.

·             Assessment of the potential “Magnitude of Impact”.  Factors include:

-          the compatibility with the surrounding landscape

-          the duration of the impact

-          the reversibility of the impact

-          the scale of the impact and distance of the source of impact from the viewer

-          the degree of visibility of the impact, and the degree to which the impact dominates the field of vision of the viewer.

7.12            The magnitude of visual impacts during different stages of construction and during operation has also been separately considered, with rating as below:

Large:                  The VSRs would suffer a major change in their viewing experience.

Intermediate:       The VSRs would suffer a moderate change in their viewing experience.

Small:                  The VSRs would suffer a small change in their viewing experience.

Negligible:           The VSRs would suffer no discernible change in their viewing experience.

·             Prediction of “Impact Significance Threshold Before Mitigation” for visual impacts.  Same as that for the landscape impact assessment, it aims to synthesize the “Sensitivity to Change” and “Magnitude of Change” for various VSRs according to Table 7.1 to assess the visual impacts in a matrix.  The degree of significance has been divided into four thresholds again:

Substantial:         Adverse / beneficial impact where the proposal would cause significant deterioration or improvement in existing visual quality

Moderate:            Adverse / beneficial impact where the proposal would cause a noticeable deterioration or improvement in existing visual quality

Slight:                  Adverse / beneficial impact where the proposal would cause barely perceptible deterioration or improvement in existing visual quality

Insubstantial:       No discernible change in the existing visual quality

·             Identification of potential Mitigation Measures.  This part is also separated into construction phase and operation phase, with proposing measures for preventing or minimizing unavoidable adverse impacts and / or generating beneficial long-term impacts.  A table for the mitigation measures is provided.  The agencies responsible for the funding/ implementation and management/ maintenance of the mitigation measures are also identified.

·             Identification of “Residual Impact Significance Threshold After Mitigation” for visual impacts.  This part indicates the accumulative influence to VSRs after applying mitigation measures, with an assumption that all proposed measures and guidelines will be fully implemented.  Like the “Impact Significance Before Mitigation”, the rating has been divided into the construction phase and operation phase.

·             Preparation of Photomontage.  To illustrate and compare the visual impact of proposed redevelopment with and without mitigation, computer-simulated views from selected VSRs to the proposed Atrium Link Extension have been generated.  Due to the urban context, nature of the proposed works and the relative little use of vegetation as mitigation, the photomontages after mitigation at Day 1 and at Year 10 will be very similar.  Thus, those at Year 10 will not be provided in this report.

Baseline Study

 

7.13            Landscape baseline review comprises of the identification of all existing Landscape Resources (LR) and Landscape Character Areas (LCA) within 100m from the project.  They are mapped in Figures 7.3 and 7.5.  Illustrative photos showing them are presented in Figures 7.4 and 7.6.  In terms of the visual aspect, Visually Sensitive Receivers (VSR) within the visual envelope of the project are mapped in Figures 7.7. Illustrative photos showing them are presented in Figures 7.8 through 7.20.  Each LR, LCA and VSR is described below: -

 

 

Landscape Resource

 

7.14            Due to the urban context of the Study Area, there are limited typologies of landscape resources found.  The nature of landscape resources, such as existing plant species, is also quite similar.  They are differentiated mostly due to their different quality of planting and their correlation to the overall landscape characters of Wan Chai north:

 

LR1 – Urban Waterfront and Harbour

7.15            The manmade waterfront forms part of the greater Victoria Harbor, which is within the scope of the Protection of Harbour Ordinance.  It is a significant resource correlates to the architectural and landscape character of the site, characterized by the sea, flat typography and open area.  There are relatively few trees, mostly found in tree pits and narrow planters.  They are all common ornamental tree species consists of both native and exotic species, such as Bauhinia spp., Ficus spp., Hibiscus tiliaceus.  They are generally of medium sizes and of fair to good conditions. 

 

LR2 – Urban Street/ Amenity Planting

7.16            This LR refers to street planting or amenity planting within private lot boundaries along streets.  The trees are mostly of medium size and of common ornamental species, such as Bauhinia spp., Ficus spp., Hibiscus tiliaceus, Acacia confusa, Cinnamomum spp., with occasional small palms.  Their conditions are generally fair if along street but better if within private lots.  Some existing trees and palms along Convention Avenue will be affected by the proposed works.  A brief tree survey has been carried out and will be assessed in the Landscape Impact Assessment section.

 

LR3 – Urban Open Space                   

7.17            This LR refers to open spaces, including semi-public (i.e., privately maintained but open to public) or private (i.e., access is controlled).  Except for the private swimming pool found at the podium of HKCEC Old Wing, the spaces are generally for passive use, characterized by ornamental planting and seating only.  These spaces contribute a significant portion of planting areas found in Wan Chai north.  The planting is of high amenity value, and is well-maintained.  The trees are generally of medium sizes and of good to fair condition.  There is more species variety in this LR, but the plants remain as common ornamental species of both native and exotic species.

 

7.18            There is no ‘Champion Trees’ and ‘Old and Valuable Trees’ identified within the Study Area.  All trees are planted ornamental ones of small to medium size and of a mix of native and exotic species.

 

Landscape Character Area

 

7.19            The Study Area is located in waterfront of Wan Chai North.  The overall landscape character is dominated by manmade, urban context with HKCEC “New Wing” as one of the iconic architecture of Hong Kong.  Various commercial buildings and associated open spaces create a mix of different landscape character areas.

 

LCA1 – HKCEC “New Wing”

7.20            The dominant feature of this LCA is the HKCEC “New Wing”, which is considered as an important landmark of Hong Kong due to its unique building form and roof design.  It is a place with political and memorial significance, marking the handover of sovereignty of Hong Kong back to Mainland China.   It consists of mostly vehicular and pedestrian circulation for reaching these plazas and promenades; important plazas (e.g. the one for flag rising) and promenades to the north of the “New Wing” are outside the Study Area.  The outdoor space is very open, with extensive flat, hardpaved areas.  It has good visual connection to Victoria Harbour and the waterfront of Kowloon south, which are also icons of Hong Kong.  This LCA does not include the existing HKCEC “Old Wing”, which forms another commercial character (LCA4) with other tall commercial towers in Wan Chai North. 

 

LCA2 – Sea Channel Space

7.21            This area is dominated by a sea channel underneath the existing HKCEC Atrium Link between the “New Wing” and the “Old Wing”.  With some above-ground seawater intake/ pumping structures and a good visual connection to the more ‘attractive’ “New Wing”, this LCA appears to be an intermediate space that people are not supposed to linger.  The space may consider as an auxiliary or ‘leftover’ space and has significantly less active pedestrian flow.

 

LCA3 – Transport Node

7.22            This LCA is dominated by a transportation interchange in which Wan Chai Ferry Pier, a bus terminal, and Harbour Center are interlinked by elevated walkways.  There is significantly more pedestrians on the elevated walkways than on the ground level. This is a ‘busier’ space characterized by pedestrian and vehicular traffic activities.

 

LCA4 – Wan Chai North Commercial

7.23            This LCA is dominated by tall commercial buildings, including HKCEC “Old Wing”, with some associated passive open spaces, which contributes to most greening for Wan Chai North.  There is a clear separation of pedestrian and vehicular flow, where heavy pedestrian flow takes place on elevated walkways interlinking and within the commercial buildings.  There are relatively much fewer pedestrians at ground level.

 

LCA5 – Wan Chai Northwest

7.24            This section of waterfront area is dominated by the roads and some public to semi-public parks and gardens, such as the HKCEC’s garden to west of Grand Hyatt Hotel.  There are only occasional pedestrian activities along the roads and the adjacent public open spaces along the Fenwick Pier Street.  The space feels more ‘remote’ from the rest of Wan Chai but somewhat pleasant as it may be considered as a ‘retreat’ within an urban environment.

 

Visually Sensitive Receiver    

 

VSR1 – HKCEC “New Wing”

7.25            The VSR consists of visitors and tourists inside and around the existing HKCEC “New Wing”.  There are views of Victoria Harbour, Wan Chai waterfront and HKCEC from Expo Drive and from the Promenade along the perimeter of HKCEC.  Views from various levels inside the HKCEC “New Wing” are similar to that of outside.  The VSR has many different view angles depending on the location and elevation. The receiver population is high.  Figure 7.8 shows HKCEC “New Wing” while Figure 7.13 shows two existing views to the Atrium Link.

 

VSR1A – HKCEC “Old Wing”

7.26            The VSR consist of mostly visitors and tourists inside the existing HKCEC “Old Wing” and the existing Atrium Link, and residents of the nearby hotels including the Grand Hyatt and Renaissance Harbour View.  This VSR in particular has prominent view of the existing HKCEC “New Wing” and the proposed Atrium Link Extension due to its orientation towards Victoria Harbour.  The receiver population is high.  Figures 7.9 – 7.12 illustrate various possible sensitive receivers in HKCEC “Old Wing” and in Renaissance Hotel View Hotel while Figures 7.14 – 7.17 shows various existing views to the Atrium Link.

                                       

VSR1B – Wan Chai Waterfront

7.27            The VSR consists of mostly travelers on foot and on vehicles on Convention Avenue, Hung Hing Road, Fenwick Pier Street, and to Wan Chai Ferry Pier and the nearby bus terminal along the waterfront.  The users of small parks between Convention Avenue and Fenwick Pier Street will have views towards the proposed Atrium Link Extension.  The receiver population is medium.  However, taking into account of the site location and the quality aspects, the sensitivity is high.  Figure 7.12 illustrates some key locations along the waterfront while Figure 7.18 shows various existing views to the Atrium Link.

 

VSR2 – Wan Chai

7.28            The VSR consists of mainly workers in skyscrapers, such as the Immigration Tower, Central Plaza, Great Eagle Centre, Harbour Centre, CITIC Tower etc., in Wan Chai north.  Students, teachers and visitors of the relatively lower Hong Kong Academy for Performing Arts also form part of the group.  The VSR has many different view angles towards the Victoria Harbour and in many cases including the glimpse to full view of the HKCEC “New Wing”. The receiver population is high.  Figure 7.12.1 shows various developments in Wan Chai while Figure 7.19 shows two existing views to the Atrium Link.

 

VSR3 – Central to Admiralty

7.29            The VSR consists of a mix of workers, travelers, visitors, tourists and military personnel along Central’s waterfront, such as the IFC Tower, Exchange Square, Star Ferry Pier, Queen’s Pier and the large, temporary vacant lot to the east of Central Barracks frequently used for carnivals, shows and concerts. The VSR has many different view angles towards the Wan Chai waterfront, with occasional glimpse or partial views of HKCEC “New Wing”. The receiver population is high.  Figure 7.12.2 shows various waterfront developments and land uses in Central and Admiralty while Figure 7.20 shows two existing views to the Atrium Link.

 

VSR4 – Causeway Bay to North Point

7.30            The VSR consists of a mix of residents and workers of high-rises and road-users on elevated bridges near Cross-Harbour Tunnel and Island East Corridor.  It also includes the visitors, workers and engagers of water recreation at the low-rise Royal Hong Kong Yacht Club and the Causeway Bay Typhoon Shelter.  The VSR generally has the glimpse views of HKCEC “New Wing”. The receiver population is high.  Figure 7.12.3 shows the Causeway Bay Typhoon Shelter and various developments in Causeway Bay to North Point while Figure 7.20.1 shows two existing views from Causeway Bay to the Atrium Link.

                                          

VSR6 – Victoria Harbour

7.31            The VSR consists of travelers and tourists on ferries, cruises, yachts and boats on Victoria Harbour.  Depending on the locations of the viewers, it has various view angles, distance and visibility towards the HKCEC “New Wing” from glimpse view to full view. The receiver population is high.  Figure 7.12.3 illustrates some key seaborne visual sensitive receivers on the Harbour while Figure 7.20.1 shows an existing view on a ferry (running from Wan Chai to Hung Hom) to the Atrium Link.

 

VSR8– Tsim Sha Tsui

7.32            The VSR consists of mostly visitors and tourists of the waterfronts public to semi-public open spaces, recreational facilities, piers, shopping malls, and hotels, such as Ocean Terminal, Star House, Star Ferry Pier, Hong Kong Cultural Centre, Hong Kong Space Museum, Hong Kong Museum of Arts, Avenue of Stars, Intercontinental Hotel, New World Centre, Shangri-La, Tsim Shan Tsui Centre, Empire, Intercontinental Grand Stanford, Nikko etc..  It has very prominent view of the HKCEC northern I and the Promenade, but the rest of HKCEC blocked by its building mass, resulting in a glimpse view only. The receiver population is high.  Figure 7.12.4 shows various waterfront developments at Tsim Shan Tsui (including Tsim Shan Tsui East) while Figures 7.20.1 – 7.20.2 show two existing ground-level views to the Atrium Link.

                                                                                       

VSR9 – Hung Hom

7.33            The VSR consists of a mix of residents, workers, visitors and tourists of the high-rises offices and hotels along the waterfront of Hung Hom, such as the skyscraper Harbourfront Landmark, Harbour Plaza, Whampoa Garden, Hunghom Peninsula, and Harbour Plaza Metropolis etc.  It has glimpse angled views towards the HKCEC “New Wing” than VSR8 but at a greater distance (>2.5km).  The receiver population is high.  Figure 7.12.4 shows some waterfront developments at Hung Hom while Figure 7.20.2 shows an existing ground-level view to the Atrium Link.

 

VSR10 – West Kowloon

7.34            The VSR consists of mostly residents of skyscrapers, such as The Harbourside and Victory Arch.  It also consists of the currently large vacant land for the future comprehensive development in West Kowloon, which is likely to have tall buildings and seaside public open spaces overlooking the harbour.  It will have glimpse, angled view to the HKCEC “New Wing”.  The receiver population is currently low.  Figure 7.12.4 shows some residential skyscrapers in West Kowloon while Figure 7.20.2 shows an existing ground-level view to the Atrium Link.

 

Landscape Impact Assessment (Before Mitigation)

 

7.35            Landscape impact arisen from the proposed works will be mostly on landscape character.  In terms of landscape resources, there will be some existing street trees along Convention Avenue to be affected.  A brief tree survey has been carried out and is described in the following section.  Each individual LR and LCA are discussed below (even for those with Slight or Negligible impact) to demonstrate the logics of the impact assessment :

 

LR1 – Urban Waterfront and Harbour 

7.36            The construction will temporarily cover an extensive area of the waterfront and thus will impose Substantial impact to the LR.  Approx. 1.9 ha of the sea channel and approx. 650m long waterfront surrounding the sea channel will be occupied by construction activities.  Another approx. 120m long waterfront adjacent to Victoria Harbour will be affected by temporary loading/ unloading activities from ships and boats at the designated “Western Marine Access Point” and “Eastern Marine Access Point” (Refer Drg. No. W01-02 in Appendix 7.1).  After the construction completes and all temporary works is removed, the area will be restored to the original conditions.  During operation, the Atrium Link Extension will shade over a larger area of the waterfront and cause some permanent loss of planting area, inducing Moderate impact.  With Road P2, WDII etc. (which requires a complete reclamation of the existing channel), the impact arisen from the Atrium Link Extension will become Insubstantial, as there will be no more sea to be affected.

 

LR2 –Urban Street/ Amenity Planting 

7.37            About 13 nos. and 1 no. group of existing street trees (comprised of all small, slow-growing Cinnamomum camphora) along Convention Avenue will be affected by the proposed works.  Considering the small amount of trees involved, their generally fair to poor conditions, and their species that are common, the impact should be Slight during both construction and operation.  With Road P2, WDII etc., the covered area of proposed ALE will cause some of the originally proposed roadside tree planting impossible.  The impact should be Moderate.

 

LR3 – Urban Open Space                   

7.38            The proposed works will use an existing open space to the west of HKCEC along the Fenwick Pier Street as temporary works area and for cooling water main diversion.  Approx. 0.3 ha of this open space will be affected.  But compared with other open spaces within the study boundary, this open space is sparsely used and isolated.  The temporary loss of this open space during the construction of the proposed ALE should induce Moderate impact.  During operation, Insubstantial impact will be imposed.  The possible Road P2, WDII etc. will take over some of the open space for construction and for permanent placement of an elevated slip road.  Therefore, with these waterfront development, the proposed ALE will actually impose Insubstantial impact, as there will be no more open space.

 

LCA1 – HKCEC “New Wing”

7.39            The construction will temporarily disturb the ‘tidy’, commercial and iconic character of the area, inducing a Moderate impact.  During operation, the Atrium Link Extension will restore its original character, imposing Insubstantial impact.  With Road P2, WDII etc., the Atrium Link Extension will not impose additional or cumulative impact.

 

LCA2 – Sea Channel Space

7.40            The construction will cover almost the entire existing sea channel space, the impact during construction should Moderate even though the LCA’s sensitive is Low.  During operation, the space will be quite similar to the existing condition.  Although the proposed ALE will intensify and increase the existing shade areas, the overall impact to the character should be Slight.  With Road P2, WDII etc., the Atrium Link Extension will not impose additional or cumulative impact, and thus the impact should remain as Slight.

 

LCA3 – Transport Node

7.41            The proposed will not affect this LCA.  The impact should be Insubstantial during both construction and operation.  With Road P2, WDII etc., the proposed ALE will not impose additional or cumulative impact.

 

LCA4 – Wan Chai North Commercial

7.42            The impact for this LCA during construction will be Moderate for similar reasons to that of LCA1.  During operation, from the landscape point of view, the bulkiness of the proposed Atrium Link Extension will moderately affect the commercial character.  The construction of Road P2, WDII etc. will continue to cause the bulkiness of the proposed Atrium Link Extension to impose Moderate impact.

LCA5 – Wan Chai Northwest

7.43            The construction will temporarily disturb the ‘retreat’ nature of the LCA, imposing Moderate impact.  During operation, the impact will become Insubstantial as the area will be reinstated to the original state.  With Road P2, WDII etc., the Atrium Link Extension will not impose additional or cumulative impact.

 

Preliminary Tree Survey

 

7.44            A brief existing tree survey and a joint site visit with representatives from Leisure and Cultural Services Department (LCSD) have been carried out in early December 2005.  Existing trees to be affected by the proposed work are surveyed and identified on a survey plan and on an assessment table with photos in Appendix 7.2.  These trees are generally small trees in fair to poor condition and are of common species.  Some of these trees are found within a roadside public open space currently maintained by Kiu Lok Service Management Co. Ltd. – a company employed by HKCEC.  Any proposed treatment to these trees shall be approved by Lands Department under the lease of HKCEC.  The rest of the trees are considered as “Roadside Trees” or “Street Trees” under the maintenance of LCSD.  All existing trees proposed to be transplanted shall be directly transplanted to the large existing HKCEC garden to the west of HKCEC “Old Wing” near Grand Hyatt Hotel.  There will be no so-called temporary holding nursery for the transplanted trees because such practice is inconsiderate to tree health.  Upon completion of the construction of the proposed Atrium Link Extension, all existing plant-bed and tree-pit planting will be reinstated with new trees. 

 

7.45            The proposed works will be under a design-build contract in which an awarded contractor will be responsible for design and reassessment of existing trees to be affected.  Treatment to existing trees (i.e., Retain, Transplant or Fell) proposed in this report is based on the best-available architectural and engineering information.  Finalized tree felling/ transplanting applications and planting proposal shall be submitted for approval to relevant authorities before commencement of works.

 

7.46            With or without the proposed Atrium Link Extension, some of the existing trees are planted in raised planter with limited width but they are of large tree species.  These trees shall be removed.  After the construction of the Atrium Link Extension, the planter shall be reinstated and shall be planted with more suitable trees and palms to avoid possible maintenance problem.

 

Visual Impact Assessment (Before Mitigation)

 

VSR1 – HKCEC “New Wing”

7.47            People from both inside and outside the “New Wing” will have a clear view to the construction, which is very visually incompatible with the existing surroundings.  However, since its main view is orientated towards the Harbour and Tsim Sha Tsui, the VSR will only suffer from Moderate (rather than Substantial) impact.  During operation, as the proposed Atrium Link Extension is rather similar to the existing one, the impact will be Slight.  With Road P2, WDII etc., the proposed Atrium Link Extension will continue to impose Slight impact.

 

VSR1A – HKCEC “Old Wing”

7.48            As the VSR has its main view orientated towards the harbour, the construction will greatly affect its visual quality.  Construction activities at the interface between the proposed Atrium Link Extension and “Old Wing” may also disturb visitors and users of the “Old Wing” even they are inside the building.  The construction will thus impose Substantial impact.  During operation, the proposed Atrium Link Extension will unavoidably block certain view from inside the “Old Wing” to the harbour (Refer to Photomontage PM2 – Day 1 Without Mitigation on Figure 7.25).  The large, flat hardpaved roof also impose Moderate impact to tourists and visitors inside Renaissance Harbour View Hotel and Grand Hyatt Hotel (Refer to Photomontage PM3– Day 1 Without Mitigation on Figure 7.26).  The completed Atrium Link Extension will actually block some undesirable view to the construction of the possible Road P2, WDII etc.  This is somewhat beneficial and thus the ultimate impact should reduce to Slight.  Visual impact for Renaissance Harbour View Hotel will be assessed in detail in the next section.

 

VSR1B – Wan Chai Waterfront

7.49            The VSR, which is comprised of mostly travelers on foot and on vehicles, will have a clear view to the construction, which is very visually incompatible and will take up an extensive area of the waterfront, inducing Substantial impact.  During operation, the increased bulk and shade created by the Atrium Link Extension will impose Moderate impact, especially to receivers along Convention Avenue (Refer to Photomontage PM1 – Day 1 Without Mitigation on Figure 7.24).  Although impact to receivers further away from the proposed works will decrease significantly (Refer to Photomontage PM4 – Day 1 Without Mitigation on Figure 7.27), the overall impact should still be Moderate.  With Road P2, WDII etc., the increased bulk and shade created by proposed Atrium Link Extension will accentuate the impact of these developments, which will take place underneath the Atrium Link.  Thus the impact arisen from the Atrium Link Extension will increase to Substantial.

 

VSR2 – Wan Chai

7.50            Only office workers in the upper level of the skyscrapers will have full view to the construction, which will be visually incompatible with the surroundings.  Since these people at high attitude cannot see the works unless they get close to windows and look down, the impact during construction should be Slight.  As soon as the construction completes, during operation, the impact will become Insubstantial.  With Road P2, WDII etc., the proposed ALE will not impose additional or cumulative impact.

 

 

VSR3 – Central to Admiralty

7.51            Due to its great distance to the works and its prevailing view across the Harbour to the north, the VSR will only suffer from Slight to Insubstantial impact during construction and during operation respectively.  With Road P2, WDII etc., the proposed ALE will not impose additional or cumulative impact.

 

VSR4 – Causeway Bay to North Point

7.52            Only office workers in the upper level of the skyscrapers will have full view to the construction.  Since these people at such a high attitude cannot see the construction unless they get close to windows and look down, the impact during construction should be Slight.  As soon as the construction completes, during operation, the impact will become Insubstantial.  With Road P2, WDII etc., the proposed ALE will not impose additional or cumulative impact.

 

VSR6 – Victoria Harbour

7.53            For this VSR, the construction of the proposed Atrium Link Extension will disturb the ‘background’ of the HKCEC “New Wing” – one of the icons of Hong Kong.  Photos of HKCEC taken by tourists on ferries will unavoidably include the construction in the context, and thus the impact will be Moderate.  During operation, as the proposed Atrium Link Extension will look rather similar to the existing one and as it will be partially blocked by HKCEC “New Wing”, the impact will be Insubstantial.  With Road P2, WDII etc., the Atrium Link Extension will not impose any additional or cumulative impact.

 

VSR8 – Tsim Sha Tsui

7.54            Although the VSR is of High sensitivity, its view towards the construction will be mostly blocked by HKCEC New Wing.  In addition, with great distance from the proposed works, the impact should be Insubstantial.  With Road P2, WDII etc., the proposed ALE will not impose additional or cumulative impact.

 

VSR9 – Hung Hom

7.55            With such great distance and relatively small scale of the proposed works, the impact should be Insubstantial.  With Road P2, WDII etc., the proposed ALE will not impose additional or cumulative impact.

 

VSR10 – West Kowloon

7.56            Impact to this VSR should be similar to that of VSR9.

 

Detail Visual Analysis for the lower levels of Renaissance Harbour View Hotel (Part of VSR1A)

 

7.57            The proposed Atrium Link Extension will extend substantially on the side facing Renaissance Harbour View Hotel and only slightly on the side facing Grand Hyatt Hotel.  Possible visual impact imposing to the lower levels of Renaissance Harbour View Hotel will be much more significant than that to Grand Hyatt Hotel.  Possible unmitigated visual impact during operation of the Atrium Link Extension to each lower levels of Renaissance Harbour View Hotel together with existing use is assessed and shown on Table 7.6.  It is found that M/F of Renaissance Harbour View Hotel will suffer from Substantial impact, and 1/F, 11/F and 12/F will suffer from Moderate visual impact.

 

7.58            Impact grading on the last column of the Table is based on a combination of intuition and qualitative analysis.  They aim not to compute or to justify the overall Impact Significance for VSR1A HKCEC “Old Wing”, but to study the existing floor use pattern and to highlight individual floors for attention, and thus for development of mitigation measures.  Many of the floors, such as the E & M floor, will be quite indifferent with the view looking outside, and thus are not considered.  Several floors forming part of the HKCEC “Old Wing” are also not considered, as they are intended to join and link up with the Atrium Link Extension to allow direct assess.

 

 

 

 

 

 


Table 7.2       Significance of Landscape Impacts Before Mitigation (Without All Adjacent Waterfront Developments)

                   

Identity No.

LR/ LCA

Sensitivity to Change

(Low, Medium, High)

Magnitude of Change before Mitigation

(Negligible, Small, Intermediate, Large)

Impact Significance Threshold BEFORE Mitigation

(Insubstantial, Slight, Moderate, Substantial)

 

 

Construction

Operation

Construction

Operation

LR1

Urban Waterfront and Harbour

High

Large

Small

Substantial

Moderate

LR2

Urban Street/ Amenity Planting

Medium

Small

Small

Slight

Slight

LR3

Urban Open Space

High

Small

Negligible

Moderate

Insubstantial

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LCA1

HKCEC “New Wing”

High

Intermediate

Negligible

Moderate

Insubstantial

LCA2

Sea Channel Space

Medium

Large

Small

Moderate

Slight

LCA3

Transport Node

Low

Negligible

Negligible

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

LCA4

Wan Chai North Commercial

High

Small

Small

Moderate

Moderate

LCA5

Wan Chai Northwest

Medium

Intermediate

Negligible

Moderate

Insubstantial

Note:  All identified impact shall mean adverse impact, unless otherwise specified.

 

 


Table 7.3       Significance of Landscape Impacts Before Mitigation (Comparison With or Without All Adjacent Waterfront Developments)

 

Identity No.

LR/ LCA

Impact Significance Threshold BEFORE Mitigation

(Insubstantial, Slight, Moderate, Substantial)

 

 

Operation

 

 

 

WITHOUT All Adjacent Waterfront Developments

WITH All Adjacent Waterfront Developments

LR1

Urban Waterfront and Harbour

Moderate

Insubstantial

LR2

Urban Street/ Amenity Planting

Slight

Moderate

LR3

Urban Open Space

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

 

 

 

 

LCA1

HKCEC “New Wing”

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

LCA2

Sea Channel Space

Slight

Slight

LCA3

Transport Node

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

LCA4

Wan Chai North Commercial

Moderate

Moderate

LCA5

Wan Chai Northwest

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Note:  All identified impact shall mean adverse impact, unless otherwise specified.


Table 7.4       Significance of Visual Impacts Before Mitigation (Without All Adjacent Waterfront Developments)

                 

Identity No.

VSR

Degree of Visibility of Source(s) of Visual Impact (glimpse, partial, full)

Minimum Distance Between VSR & Source(s) of Impact (m)

Receptor Sensitivity

(Low, Medium, High)

Magnitude of Change in View before Mitigation

(Negligible, Small, Intermediate, Large)

Impact Significance Threshold BEFORE Mitigation

(Insubstantial, Slight, Moderate, Substantial)

 

 

 

 

Construction

Operation

Construction

Operation

VSR1

HKCEC “New Wing”

Partial to full

Very close

High

Intermediate

Negligible

Moderate

Slight

VSR1A

HKCEC “Old Wing”

Partial to full

Very close

High

Large

Intermediate

Substantial

Moderate

VSR1B

Wan Chai Waterfront

Partial to full

Very close

High

Large

Small

Substantial

Moderate

VSR2

Wan Chai

Glimpse to full

120

Medium

Small

Negligible

Slight

Insubstantial

VSR3

Central to Admiralty

Glimpse to partial

1200

Medium

Small

Negligible

Slight

Insubstantial

VSR4

Causeway Bay to North Point

Glimpse

900

Medium

Small

Negligible

Slight

Insubstantial

VSR6

Victoria Harbour

Glimpse to full

Very close

High

Intermediate

Negligible

Moderate

Insubstantial

VSR8

Tsim Sha Tsui

Glimpse

1200

High

Negligible

Negligible

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

VSR9

Hung Hom

Glimpse

2500

Medium

Negligible

Negligible

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

VSR10

West Kowloon

Glimpse

3000

Medium

Negligible

Negligible

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Note:  All identified impact shall mean adverse impact, unless otherwise specified.

 


Table 7.5       Significance of Visual Impacts Before Mitigation (Comparison With or Without All Adjacent Waterfront Developments)

 

Identity No.

VSR

Impact Significance Threshold BEFORE Mitigation during Operation

(Insubstantial, Slight, Moderate, Substantial)

 

 

 

 

WITHOUT All Adjacent Waterfront Developments

WITH All Adjacent Waterfront Developments

VSR1

HKCEC “New Wing”

Slight

Slight

VSR1A

HKCEC “Old Wing”

Moderate

Slight

VSR1B

Wan Chai Waterfront

Moderate

Substantial

VSR2

Wan Chai

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

VSR3

Central

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

VSR4

Causeway Bay to North Point

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

VSR6

Victoria Harbour

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

VSR8

Tsim Sha Tsui

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

VSR9

Hung Hom

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

VSR10

West Kowloon

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Note:  All identified impact shall mean adverse impact, unless otherwise specified.

 


Table 7.6       Visual Impact for Lower Levels of Renaissance Hotel View Hotel in VSR1A during Operation

                 

Levels

Floor

Existing Uses

Description of Impact

Impact Grading

 

13/F & Up

Guest Rooms

The guest rooms will have a view to the metal structural arches from the proposed Atrium Link roof.  The visual impact will be Slight.

Slight

+58.7

12/F

Guest Rooms

The guest rooms will have a clear view to the large paved roof at +55.80 of proposed Atrium Link.  The visual impact will be Moderate.

Moderate

+55.7

11/F

Steak House, Podium Swimming Pool, Guest Rooms

The steak house and the podium swimming pool will have a clear, close (approx. 16 metres) view to the bulk building façade of the Atrium Link Hall 3 Extension of the Atrium Link roof.  The visual impact will be Moderate.   For the steak room, as the existing small windows do not suggest a strong visual connection to the outside, the visual impact will be Slight.

Moderate

+53.2

10/F

E & M Floor

(Not considered)

 

 

+51.5

9/F

Transfer Plate

(Not considered)

 

 

+46.9

8/F

Music Lounge

The entrance area of the music lounge will have a clear, close (approx. 11 metres) view to the building façade of the Atrium Link Hall 3 Extension.  However, since its major view is orientated to the northeast towards the Harbour, the visual impact will be Slight.

Slight

+41.3

7/F

HKCEC “Old Wing” Upper Hall

(Not considered)

 

 

+35.3-35.5

6/F

HKCEC “Old Wing” Gallery

(Not considered)

 

 

+29.8

5/F

HKCEC “Old Wing” Lower Hall

(Not considered)

 

 

+24.5

4/F

Hotel Executive Offices

(Not considered)

 

 

+21.0

3/F

Chinese Restaurant

One of the VIP of the restaurant will have a clear, close (approx. 11 metres) view to the building façade of the Atrium Link Hall 1 Extension.  However, since its major view is orientated to the east towards Flemming Road and to the northeast towards the Harbour, the visual impact will be Slight.

Slight

+17.0

2/F

HKCEC “Old Wing” Conference Hall

(Not considered)

 

+12.5

M/F

Café

The view from the Café will be blocked.  It will have a clear, close (approx. 11 metres) view to the building façade of the Atrium Link Hall 1 Extension.  As the existing view from the Café is orientated to the north towards the “New Wing”, the visual impact will be Substantial. 

Substantial

+9.8

1/F

Hotel Upper Lobby, Reception

A corner of the lobby lounge will be a clear view to the entire building façade of the Atrium Link Extension.  The bulk of the Extension will cause visual impact, affecting the ‘relaxing mood’ of the guests.  However, since the major view of the lobby is orientated to the northeast towards the Victoria Harbour, the impact will be Moderate, rather than Substantial.

Moderate

+4.0

G/F

Hotel Lower Lobby, Drop-off

(Not considered)

 

 

 

 

 

Overall

Moderate

Note:  All identified impact shall mean adverse impact, unless otherwise specified.

 

 


Recommended Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures

 

7.59            Recommended mitigation measures, which are applicable to individual LR, LCA and VSR, are tabulated in Table 7.7, together with an indication of the responsible parties for funding, implementation, management and maintenance. Figure 7.21 and Figure 7.22 illustrates the recommended landscape mitigation measures to be implemented for the area underneath the Atrium Link Extension and for the roofs.

 

7.60            Mitigation measures during construction will be implemented from the start and shall be applied for the whole duration of the construction period.  Mitigation measures during operation will be included in the detailed design and shall be constructed or built up during the construction.  All mitigation measures will be implemented by TDC’s contractors and hotel operators.

 

Residual Impacts

 

7.61            The potential residual landscape and visual impacts during construction and during operation after mitigation are provided in Table 7.8 to Table 7.9.  Scenarios if all possible waterfront future developments (e.g. Road P2, WDII etc.) are to be constructed are considered separately for Day 1 operation, Year 10 operation of the Atrium Link Extension.

 

7.62            With mitigation measures, only 1 no. LR and 2 nos. VSRs will suffer from Moderate impact:

 

LR1 – Urban Waterfront and Harbour

7.63            Mitigation measures will not be able to deal with the fact the construction will cover a significant area of the waterfront and the sea.  The residual landscape impact during construction will be Moderate.

                                     

VSR1A – HKCEC “Old Wing”

7.64            With such close distance and prevailing view towards the New Wing and the Harbour, the hotels will still have much view to the construction even with mitigation measures.  No matter how much temporary screen is provided, the construction still cannot be ‘hidden’ from the hotels.  The residual visual impact during construction will be Moderate.

 

VSR1B – Wan Chai Waterfront

7.65            Even with mitigation measures, tourists enjoying and taking photos of the waterfront will still have much view to the construction, which is visually incompatible.  It will be impossible and unpractical to ‘hide’ the construction in such as an open area.  The residual visual impact during construction will be Moderate.  During operation and with Road P2, WDII etc.., mitigation measures will not be able to deal with the significant increase in covered vehicular surface, inducing Moderate visual impact.

Photomontage of Residual Visual Impact

 

7.66            Photomontages of Residual Visual Impact for Day 1 after mitigation are illustrated in Figure 7.24 Figure 7.27. The locations of the view of the photomontages are mapped in Figure 7.23.  Due to the urban context and relatively little use of new vegetation as mitigations, photomontages for Year 10 will NOT be provided in this report.

 

7.67            Due to the great uncertainty of the programme and layout of all adjacent waterfront developments, generic limits of the proposed Road P2 is shown in dash lines for reference only.  This should not be considered as an assumption that these developments will or will not be constructed.

 

Three-dimensional Architectural/ Landscape Illustration

 

7.68            A digital model of the proposed ALE has been constructed.  It is shown in Figure 7.28 to provide a three-dimensional illustration and a better understanding of the exterior design, especially for the roofs.

 

Conclusion

 

7.69            There will be some residual impacts due to the construction of the proposed ALE:

-              LR1 Urban Waterfront and Harbour will receive Moderate residual landscape impact,

-              VSR1A HKCEC “Old Wing” will receive Moderate residual visual impact, and

-              VSR1B Wan Chai Waterfront will receive Moderate residual visual impact.

7.70            There will be only minor residual impact due to the operation of the proposed ALE:

-              VSR1B Wan Chai Waterfront will receive Moderate residual visual impact if possible waterfront developments proceed.

7.71            The proposed Atrium Link Extension will significantly increase the size of the exiting Atrium Link to meet the need for the expanding exhibition demands in the region.  It will increase the size of the building structure, rooftop surfaces, and shady areas underneath it.  But with cascaded rooftops landscaped with various in-situ planting and potted planting (30% of the roof area as planting area for the project will be achieved), suitable architectural façade treatment and sensitive design for covered shady area underneath, the Atrium Link Extension will not impose substantial landscape and visual impact.  It will reinforce the image of HKCEC as the choice of exhibitions for regional and global businesses.  With reference to criteria defined in Annex 10 of the EIAO TM, landscape and visual impacts in the construction and operational phases will be acceptable after applying mitigation measures.


Table 7.7       Recommended Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures

 

ID No.

Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measure

Funding

Implementation

Management

Maintenance

 

CONSTRUCTION

 

 

 

 

CM-01

Visual Screen – Construction activities will be very incompatible with the existing surroundings.  It will substantially affect the visual quality and landscape character of area.  It is necessary to develop mitigation measures to reduce the visual impact.

 

Hoarding Design – The hoardings shall serve as visual screen for the construction.  They shall be sufficient tall and properly designed to reduce the visual impact to the surroundings.  They shall also be well-maintained and cleaned frequently throughout the construction period.

 

Temporary Partition Walls - The proposed Atrium Link Extension will involve much interface works to the hotels, HKCEC “New Wing” and “Old Wing”.  Partition walls shall be properly designed and installed inside the buildings around interface areas to be closed off for construction.

 

Screen for Hotels – The hotel will have a direct view to the construction site. TDC shall liaise with the hotel operators to take appropriate measures to reduce the impact, e.g. the use of curtains or provisions of temporary screens, if necessary.

 

TDC

TDC’s Contractor

-

-

CM-02

Temporary Footbridge – The existing Atrium Link will be closed during construction and its role to link up the “New Wing” and the “Old Wing” will be taken over by a temporary footbridge.  The temporary footbridge shall be carefully designed to minimize visual impact.

 

TDC

TDC’s Contractor

-

-

CM-03

Existing Trees within Works Areas – The project engineer has designated several works areas near the construction for possible site offices and material storage, including an existing public waterfront open space to the west of HKCEC (designated by the engineer as Works Area E).  The land use for these works areas should be flexible so that no tree felling or transplanting will be required.  All existing trees within these works areas shall be properly maintained and protected for their crowns, trunks and roots.  Should the boundary of construction expand during the construction, the scope of tree protection shall also expand respectively.  Once the construction completes, the open space shall be reinstated to match the existing and reopened to the public.

 

TDC

TDC’s Contractor

-

-

CM-04

Access for Construction Workers - A recent example from the expansion project of the Hong Kong International Airport shows some public’s concerns on possible impacts of construction workers to users of existing facilities.  Construction access from the outside to the works areas shall be provided without passing through the hotels and the existing HKCEC.

 

TDC

TDC’s Contractor

-

-

CM-05

Construction Light – All outdoor floodlights for the construction site shall be equipped with adjustable shield and shall be carefully controlled to minimize unnecessary glare to the surroundings at night, especially to the residents of the adjacent hotels.

 

TDC

TDC’s Contractor

-

-

 

OPERATION

 

 

 

 

OM-01

Sensitive Design for Rooftop Spaces – The existing Atrium Link roof is extensively hardpaved with some exposed architectural/ structural metal features.  The proposed Atrium Link Extension will create a larger flat roof, but there is great opportunity for improvement.  TDC intends to utilize the roof at +51.80 as gardens and the roof at +55.80 for placement of satellite dishes and for private functions.  The followings should be considered: -

 

Soft Landscape – The existing and the proposed Atrium Link Extension will span over an existing sea channel of substantial width of over 80 metres to cater for future possible P2 Road and the Central-Wanchai Bypass.  Structural loading consideration is very tight and each kPa loading added on top of each level with a have cumulative and exponentially increase in loading to the foundation piles, which must also be limited to avoid the possible impact to MTR and KCRC underground railways.  The proposed roofs will support limited soil depth for planting.  The rooftops will be landscaped with various grasses, climbers, groundcovers, low shrubs, and potted plants with small palms and trees. 30% of the roof area as planting area for the project will be achieved. This will reduce ‘heat island effect’ of the roof and will enhance the overall visual quality of the space.

 

Roof Finish – The roofs shall be finished with paving materials in several colour tone variations, such as different shades of greens, to visually break down the ‘bulkiness’ of vast flat roof.  The roof at +41.15 is considered as architectural ‘wing’ roof supporting the overall modern to contemporary style of HKCEC.  It will be accessible only to maintenance crews and will be paved with non-reflective materials with various tones of colours and textures to form paving patterns that are readable from a distance.

 

Lighting – The proposed rooftop garden at +51.80 and the upper roof deck at +55.80 shall generally adopt a ‘landscape’ approach to avoid unnecessary glare.  It is expected that the upper roof deck at +55.80 will be used for passive functions, such as wine tasting.  Active functions, such as games shows, will not take place there.

 

Figure 7.22 shows the landscaped rooftops of the proposed Atrium Link Extension.  Figure 7.28 provides a three-dimensional illustration of the rooftop spaces.  Figure 7.30 provides photo illustration for the landscape design.  Figures 7.31 & 7.32 show sections across the proposed building structure and outdoor areas.

 

TDC        

TDC’s Contractor

HKCEC Management

HKCEC Management

OM-02

Sensitive Design for Shady Area – The existing public area under the existing Atrium Link is only used by a few pedestrians during the day.  While the proposed Atrium Link Extension will intensify the shade, there are great opportunities to improve the space.    A number of sensitive designs shall be provided for this covered but open-air public space: -

 

Paving – The area shall be hardpaved with paving materials with various colour and textures to form paving patterns that enhance the visual quality of the space.

 

Hard Landscape - Simple hard landscape design such as rockworks, may create some interests/ focus to the space.  Decoration to the bottom of the ALE, together with other decoration to the ALE, may also be provided during festivals to improve the appearance of the space.

 

Soft Landscape - Planter beds with small palms (such as Chrysalidocarpus lutescens) similar to the existing ones shall be provided at the edge of the cover to increase overall amenity value and to ‘hide’ the staircases and fire exits from the Atrium Link Extension above.

 

Lighting – The space shall be sufficiently lit by ceiling mount lights day and night via an intelligent system of photocells, timers, and manual bypass.  Luminance level shall be designed to achieve the standards required by Highway Department’s Public Lighting Design Manual.  Tentatively, the section for “Covered Public Transport Interchanges” in the Manual may be referenced for the consideration, subject to further liaison with Highway Department and Transport Department.  Electrical wiring shall be designed to turn on or off lights in interpolated groups so that the overall luminance can be adjusted during different time of a day.

 

Figure 7.21 shows the landscaped treatment to the space under the proposed Atrium Link Extension.  Figure 7.29 provides photo illustration for the landscape design.  Figure 7.32 shows section across the proposed building structure, outdoor and shady areas.

 

TDC        

TDC’s Contractor

HKCEC Management

HKCEC Management

OM-03

Appearance of Building Service Elements – The appearance of building service elements, such as ventilation shaft, exhaust fans, outdoor air conditioning units, on the roofs shall be properly designed to avoid the industrial feel. 

 

TDC/ Contractor

TDC’s Contractor

HKCEC Management

HKCEC Management

OM-04

Transplanting of Trees to Adjacent Locations – A site visit has been carried out with representatives from LCSD on 29 November 2005.  Existing trees to be affected shall be transplanted to other public locations within HKCEC’s management, tentatively to a garden to the west of the existing HKCEC “Old Wing” near Grant Hyatt Hotel.  The construction program should also allow sufficient time for root pruning and rootball preparation prior to transplanting.

 

TDC/ Contractor

TDC’s Contractor

HKCEC Management

HKCEC Management

OM-05

Sensitive Design for Building Architecture – Smaller exhibition halls should be placed at the upper levels of the proposed Atrium Link Extension to create cascades to visually reduce the bulkiness of the building structure and to create rooftops for greening opportunities.  The design of the east and west elevation of the proposed Atrium Link Extension shall merge into the existing architectural language of the HKCEC “New Wing” articulated with linear lines and varying degree of opacity to visually break down the scale of the facades.  Colours and materials to be used should ensure an overall harmonious image of the entire HKCEC development.

 

Various photomontages in Figures 7.24 7.27 demonstrate the façade treatments.  Figure 7.28 provides a three-dimensional illustration of the cascaded building forms of the proposed Atrium Link Extension incorporated with landscaped rooftops.

 

TDC/ Contractor

TDC’s Contractor

HKCEC Management

HKCEC Management

OM-06

Interior Visual Screen – The hotel management may consider applying various visual screens to the existing windows with the views blocked by the proposed Atrium Link Extension.  The provision may include the use of opaque glazing, louvers, and curtains, which has great opportunity to be made ‘elegant’ to match the interior design of a facility, like the steak house at 11/F of Renaissance Harbour View Hotel.

 

Hotels

Hotels

Hotels

 

Hotels

 

OM-07

Interior Layout Rearrangement – The building bulk of the proposed Atrium Link Extension will unavoidably affect the visual quality of certain sensitive uses of the lower levels of the hotels.  The hotel management may consider relocating some of their facilities, especially the small café at M level of Renaissance Harbour View Hotel.

 

Hotels

Hotels

Hotels

Hotels

OM-08

Night-time Glare – Floodlighting to the building façade of the proposed Atrium Link Extension shall be carefully designed and controlled to avoid disturbing the predominant view to the Harbour from the lower levels of the hotels.

 

TDC/ Contractor

TDC’s Contractor

HKCEC Management

HKCEC Management

OM-09

Reinstatement of Existing Waterfront Areas – The existing waterfront public footpath along Convention Avenue and the public open space to the west of HKCEC along the Fenwick Pier Street currently managed/ maintained by HKCEC will be used for temporary works area and water main diversion.  These areas shall be reinstated properly with suitable paving, planter kerbs/ walls, railings, trees and shrubs.

TDC/ Contractor

TDC’s Contractor

HKCEC Management

HKCEC Management

 

 

 


Table 7.8       Landscape Impacts After Mitigation

 

Identity No.

LR/ LCA

Recommended Mitigation Measure

Residual Impact Significance Threshold AFTER Mitigation (Insubstantial, Slight, Moderate, Substantial)

 

 

Construction

Operation

Construction

 

Operation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Day 1

 

Year 10

 

 

 

 

 

 

WITHOUT All Adjacent Waterfront Developments

WITH All Adjacent Waterfront Developments

WITHOUT All Adjacent Waterfront Developments

WITH All Adjacent Waterfront Developments

LR1

Urban  Waterfront and Harbour

CM-03

OM-04, OM-09

Moderate

Slight

Insubstantial

Slight

Insubstantial

LR2

Urban Street/ Amenity Planting

CM-03

OM-01, -04, -09

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

 

Slight

 

Insubstantial

 

Slight

 

LR3

Urban Open Space

CM-03

OM-04, -09

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LCA1

HKCEC “New Wing”

CM-01, -02, -03, -04, -05

 

OM-02, -03, -05

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

LCA2

Sea Channel Space

CM-01, -03, -05

 

OM-02, -03, -05

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

LCA3

Transport Node

-

-

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

LCA4

Wan Chai North Commercial

CM-01, -02, -03, -04, -05

OM-01, -02, -03, -05

Slight

Slight

Slight

Slight

Slight

LCA5

Wan Chai Northwest

CM-01, -03, -05,

 

OM-02, -03

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial


Table 7.9       Visual Impacts After Mitigation

 

Identity No.

VSR

Recommended Mitigation Measure

Residual Impact Significance Threshold AFTER Mitigation (Insubstantial, Slight, Moderate, Substantial)

 

 

Construction

Operation

Construction

 

Operation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Day 1

 

Year 10

 

 

 

 

 

 

WITHOUT All Adjacent Waterfront Developments

WITH All Adjacent Waterfront Developments

WITHOUT All Adjacent Waterfront Developments

WITH All Adjacent Waterfront Developments

VSR1

HKCEC “New Wing”

CM-01, -02, -03, -04, -05

OM-01, -02, -03, -04, -05

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

VSR1A

HKCEC “Old Wing”

CM-01, -02, -03, -04, -05

OM-01, -02, -03, -04, -05, -06, -07, -08

Moderate

Slight

Insubstantial

Slight

Insubstantial

VSR1B

Wan Chai Waterfront

CM-01, -03

OM-01, -02, -04, -05

Moderate

Slight

Moderate

Slight

Moderate

VSR2

Wan Chai

-

OM-01

 

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

VSR3

Central to Admiralty

-

OM-01

 

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

VSR4

Causeway Bay to North Point

-

OM-01

 

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

VSR6

Victoria Harbour

CM-01

OM-02

 

Slight

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

VSR8

Tsim Sha Tsui

-

-

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

VSR9

Hung Hom

-

OM-01

 

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

VSR10

West Kowloon

-

OM-01

 

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Insubstantial

Note:  All identified impact shall mean adverse impact, unless otherwise specified.