Effect on Existing Marine
Navigation for the Black Point Location
D1
Marine Navigation
D1.1 General
The principal hazards associated
with a LNG carrier underway to and from a terminal within
·
Carrier Marine traffic
(striking or being struck by any self propelled ship whilst underway to an LNG
terminal within
· Grounding (when the carrier comes to a complete stop during transit to/from the terminal and is no longer able to manoeuvre); as a result of impacting the seabed or shoreline;
· The LNG carrier striking a navigation aid or the jetty; and,
·
Striking moored LNG carrier by
passing traffic.
Although no breach of containment
has occurred from collision incidents in over three decades of LNG carrier
operation, release of LNG is possible if there is sufficient penetration
energy. That energy depends
on the displacement, speed, design and angle of contact of the striking vessel
The probability of the occurrence
of a collision between LNG carrier and other vessel is governed by:
· Mechanical failure (propulsion or steering gear);
· Non-compliance with the Collision Regulations;
· Density of traffic within navigable waterway restricting room to manoeuvre;
· Environmental factors (i.e., visibility, current velocity, wind speed / direction etc); and,
· Human error (pilot inexperience with carrier manoeuvrability, wrong helm instruction or incorrect application of helm command);.
Grounding refers to the incident
of an LNG carrier coming to a complete stop and no longer able to manoeuvre as
a result of impacting the seabed or shoreline. Although no breach of containment has
occurred from grounding incidents in over three decades of LNG carrier
operation, there is potential for release of cargo after grounding. A smooth seabed of sand or mud will
apply a cushioning effect and penetration energy is usually spread over a large
area of the carrier. Penetration
through the double hull into the containment system is, therefore, less likely. Rocky seabed causes more jagged
penetration with the impact being absorbed over a much smaller area and a
greater risk for damage to the containment.
The probability of the occurrence
of a powered grounding is governed by:
· Carrier draft versus projected water depth;
· Navigable channel dimensions;
· Navigation aids missing or not in charted position;
· Environmental factors (i.e., visibility, current velocity, wind speed / direction etc);
· Collision avoidance manoeuvre;
· Incomplete passage plan; and,
·
Inexperience of pilot with
carrier manoeuvrability.
Impact with structures refers to
the LNG carrier making unplanned contact with the approach channel or turning
circle navigation aids (allision) or with the jetty
during the approach manoeuvre.
The potential for a breach of
containment as a result of a LNG carrier striking a fixed object in the
vicinity of the terminal would be dependent upon the speed and angle of
impact. In order for such an
incident to occur, there would have to be a failure in navigational procedures,
tug control, mechanical failure, or excessive speed during the approach
manoeuvre.
Grounding incidents are not a
common occurrence in
When manoeuvring near the berth
laden (arriving) LNG carriers should be moving at relatively low speeds and in
the final approach to the jetty be under tug control, as such this hazard is of
a lesser order than collision or grounding as significant damage to the LNG
carrier hull is unlikely.
The probability of the occurrence
for an LNG carrier striking the jetty structure during approach is governed by:
· Mechanical failure (carrier propulsion or steering gear);
· Environmental conditions (wind speed exceeds forecast, current velocity and direction not as predicted);
· Number and performance of assist tugs;
· Mechanical failure of tug(s);
· Human error (pilot inexperience in docking manoeuvre); and,
· Excessive approach speed without parallel landing on fenders.
Impact resulting from an LNG
carrier being struck while moored at the jetty is also a potential hazard. The
factors impacting the potential for impact while moored are similar to those
presented above for ship collision.
The probability of striking the LNG carrier at the jetty is governed by:
· Proximity to other traffic;
· Nature and volume of local traffic;
· Metocean conditions;
·
Level of ship handling
experience on passing traffic personnel;
·
Mechanical failure, propulsion
or steering gear; and,
· Passing traffic intruding into the prescribed safe distance.
D2
Marine Passage to Black Point
The marine transit route to Black
Point (via East Lamma Channel, Western Fairway, Ma
Wan and
In order to permit safe access
for LNG carriers a dredged access and turning basin of sufficient depth will be
required. The bathymetry contours after dredging the access and turning basin
for Black Point are estimated to result in layers of sediment ranging in height
from 50% to 60% of the water depth. These contours pose a potential grounding
hazard to carriers arriving or departing, although it is recognised the soft marine
sediments pose little risk to the hull integrity. Arrivals and departures may, however,
have to be limited to certain states of the tide with the possible exception of
a departure enforced by the proximity of a typhoon.
Although strong currents (over
two knots) exist to the west of the area within the main channel the jetty is
in a region of comparatively low current magnitude (less than 0.5 knots) due to
the existing shallow water embayment.
The tidal current gradients across the approach and turning area have to
be compensated for on arrival and departure, while large eddies may be shed by
the reclamation into the path of a carrier berthing, unberthing
or moored in a flood tide.
Tidal current restrictions are
already in place for transit around Ma Wan and it would be important to ensure
that suitable tidal windows at Ma Wan and Black Point give the necessary
flexibility to provide for a safe operation. This restriction is currently managed by
large bulk carriers arriving at Tap Shek Kok, who “ride” the tidal high water from Ma Wan, ensuring
that both passage at Ma Wan, and arrivals at the jetty can be conducted in the
most optimal conditions.
Transit to Black Point is planned
via the established route through East Lamma Channel,
Ma Wan and
The passage of an LNG carrier to the
Black Point site can be summarised as follows:
(1) From
the point where the carrier enters Hong Kong waters to the pilot boarding area
near
(2) From
the point where the pilot is picked up through the East Lamma
Channel to the Western Fairway at
(3) From
(4) From
the start of the Ma Wan Fairway, going through the Ma Wan Fairway between Tsing Yi and Ma Wan around turn to west up to location
south of Brothers Point in Tai Lam Chung -This section crosses under the Tsing Ma Bridge from Tsing Yi to
Ma Wan and turns west. Large vessel
traffic in this area is under a one way control plan for ships greater than or
equal to 170m or for drafts greater than or equal to 9.5m. Two additional tug escorts will be
available south-west of Tsing Yi, with one tug being
made fast to the LNG carrier prior to transiting the turn around Ma Wan Island.
(5) From
the location south of Brothers Point up to
(6) From
the start of
(7) Transit
approach channel, with tug assistance turn 180deg and then berth carrier to
jetty - The waters around this area are very shallow, with the primary traffic
being small craft and shallow draft river trade vessels.
High density traffic passing the
site predominantly comprises coastal river trade vessels transiting between Kwai Chung and the
The route for ocean-going vessels
is delineated by traffic separation fairways and marked by navigation
aids. Regulations have been
established for control of traffic while transiting the Ma Wan Fairway.
The route to be followed by LNG
carriers is identical to that of vessels (including the world’s largest
container ships) that access the Mainland ports at Shekou
& Chiwan, and experience with ocean-going CLP
coal carriers has demonstrated that transit to Black Point can be done safely.
D3 Summary for Marine Navigation
A summary of the parameter values and relative scores derived from the engineering assessment for the construction of the approach channel and turning basin is given in Table D1 below.
Table D1 - Summary for Marine Navigation
Parameter |
Option 1 |
Option 2 |
Option 3 |
Marine traffic |
RS = 3 |
RS = 3 |
RS = 3 |
Grounding potential |
RS = 3 |
RS = 3 |
RS = 3 |
LNG carrier striking jetty |
RS = 3 |
RS = 3 |
RS = 3 |
Striking of the moored carrier by passing traffic |
RS = 3 |
RS = 3 |
RS = 3 |
RS = Relative Score
D4 Scoring for Marine Navigation
Each of the parameters summarised above in Table D1 have also been scored in accordance with the procedure described in Section 2.1. The results are shown below in Table D2 for each of the layout options at Black Point. The table also shows the total score for each site derived using the weightings given in Table 2.6.
Table D2 – Scoring for Layout Options
at Black Point for Marine Navigation
Parameter |
Weight |
Option 1 |
Option 2 |
Option 3 |
|||
Score |
WS |
Score |
WS |
Score |
WS |
||
Marine traffic |
0.50 |
3 |
1.50 |
3 |
1.50 |
3 |
1.50 |
Grounding potential |
0.10 |
3 |
0.30 |
3 |
0.30 |
3 |
0.30 |
LNG carrier striking jetty |
0.10 |
3 |
0.30 |
3 |
0.30 |
3 |
0.30 |
Striking of the moored carrier by passing traffic |
0.30 |
3 |
0.90 |
3 |
0.90 |
3 |
0.90 |
Total Weighted Score |
|
3.00 |
|
3.00 |
|
3.00 |
|
Normalised Score |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
From the result of the assessment of all parameters for the marine navigation, all layout options have the same score.