5      WASTE MANAGEMENT.. 5-1

5.1   Introduction. 5-1

5.2        Waste Control and Mitigation Measures. 5-1

 

 

 

5                    WASTE MANAGEMENT

5.1              Introduction

5.1.1        Waste management will be the contractor’s responsibility to ensure that all wastes produced during the construction of the Project are handled, stored and disposed of in accordance with the recommended good waste management practices and EPD’s regulations and requirements.  The contractor will be required to ensure that loss of dredged material does not take place during transportation of the material in barges to the designated marine disposal ground.

5.1.2        Other waste materials generated during the construction activities, such as construction and demolition (C&D) materials, chemical wastes and general refuse from the workforce, are recommended to be audited at regular intervals (at least quarterly) to ensure that proper storage, transportation and disposal practices are being implemented.  This monitoring of waste management practices will ensure that these solid and liquid wastes generated during construction are not disposed of into the surrounding marine waters.  The Contractor will be responsible for the implementation of any mitigation measures to minimise waste or redress problems arising from the waste materials.

5.2              Waste Control and Mitigation Measures

5.2.1        Mitigation measures for waste management of the Projects are summarised below. Specific mitigation measures for each Schedule 2 Designated Projects are presented in Appendices D to I. The Implementation Schedule of the recommended mitigation measures is presented in Appendix A. With the appropriate handling, storage and removal of waste arisings during the construction of the Project as defined below, the potential to cause adverse environmental impacts will be minimised.  In order to ensure that the mitigation measures are properly implemented by the Contractor, regular site inspections by the ET shall be carried out at least once per week. Details of the audit requirements are set out in Section 9 of this EM&A Manual.

Dredged Marine Sediments

5.2.2        The basic requirements and procedures for dredged mud disposal are specified under the ETWB TCW No. 34/2002.  The MFC is responsible for the provision and management of disposal capacity for dredged/excavated sediment, and DEP is responsible for the issue of permits for marine disposal under the provisions of the Dumping at Sea Ordinance (Cap. 466).

5.2.3        The dredged marine sediments would be loaded onto barges and transported to and disposed of at the designated disposal sites at South of Cheung Chau, Eat of Ninepin, East of Tung Lung Chau, South of Tsing Yi and East of Sha Chau to be allocated by the Marine Fill Committee depending on their level of contamination after consultation with the MFC and EPD.  Based on the chemical screening results, the majority of the marine sediment to be dredged was classified as contaminated and would require Type 2 confined marine disposal.  In accordance with the ETWB TCW No. 34/2002, the contaminated material must be dredged and transported with great care, and the mitigation measures recommended in Section 6 of this Report should be strictly followed.  Furthermore, the dredged contaminated sediment must be effectively isolated from the environment upon final disposal and the project proponent will consult the Marine Fill Committee about the disposal requirement.  The final disposal site will be determined by the Marine Fill Committee and a dumping licence will be obtained from EPD prior to the commencement of the dredging works.


5.2.4        Based on the biological screening results, the Category H (>10xLCEL) sediment which failed the biological testing would require Type 3 special disposal.  The volume of Category H sediment from the Causeway Bay typhoon shelter which would require special disposal arrangements is estimated to be approximately 0.05 Mm3.  It was agreed with EPD during the WDII Comprehensive Feasibility Study (CFS) that special disposal arrangements, rather than pre-treatment, would be appropriate provided there would be negligible loss of sediment to the marine environment during the dumping operations.([1])  A detailed review of possible special disposal arrangements for the contaminated sediment was carried out in the WDII CFS with the objective of keeping the loss of sediment to the surrounding marine environment to a negligible extent.  The method pursued as having the least potential for loss of contaminants to the marine environment is by containment of the sediments in geosynthetic containers.  A feasible containment method is proposed whereby the dredged sediments are sealed in geosynthetic containers and, at the disposal site, the containers would be dropped into the designated contaminated mud pit where they would be covered by further mud disposal and later by the mud pit capping, thereby meeting the requirements for fully confined mud disposal.  The technology is readily available for the manufacture of the geosynthetic containers to the project-specific requirements.  Similar disposal methods have been used for projects in Europe, the USA and Japan (for example, geosynthetic fabric containers have been used to contain contaminated dredged sediment at Marina Del Rey in California and Yokohama Port in Japan) and the issues of fill retention by the geosynthetic fabrics, possible rupture of the containers and sediment loss due to impact of the container on the seabed have been addressed.([2])  The recommended field trials were undertaken during the WDII Design and Construction (D&C) consultancy (Agreement No. CE54/2001 (CE)) using uncontaminated mud to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed method.

5.2.5        The ACE Report([3]) [to be endorsed by ACE] on the field trials of geosynthetic containers concluded that disposal by sealing the dredged sediments in geosynthetic containers and dropping these containers into the contaminated mud pits at East Sha Chau has been shown to be a successful and viable disposal method.  The use of a geosynthetic container system for special disposal was considered to be an effective system with negligible loss of contaminants to the marine environment during disposal.  The container design and handling method were refined through the field trials for the determination of the optimal design and handling method.

5.2.6        It will be the responsibility of the Contractor to satisfy the appropriate authorities that the contamination levels of the marine sediment to be dredged have been analysed and recorded.  According to the ETWB TCW No. 34/2002, this will involve the submission of a formal Sediment Quality Report to the DEP, at least 3 months prior to the dredging contract being tendered. 

 


5.2.7        During transportation and disposal of the dredged marine sediments requiring Type 1 and Type 2 disposal, the following measures should be taken to minimise potential impacts on water quality:

·                   Bottom opening of barges shall be fitted with tight fitting seals to prevent leakage of material. 

·                   Monitoring of the barge loading shall be conducted to ensure that loss of material does not take place during transportation.  Transport barges or vessels shall be equipped with automatic self-monitoring devices as specified by the DEP.

·                   Barges or hopper barges shall not be filled to a level that would cause the overflow of materials or sediment laden water during loading or transportation.

Good Site Practices

5.2.8        Adverse impacts related to waste management are not expected to arise, provided that good site practices are strictly followed.  Recommendations for good site practices during the construction activities include:

·                    Nomination of an approved person, such as a site manager, to be responsible for good site practices, arrangements for collection and effective disposal to an appropriate facility, of all wastes generated at the site.

·                    Training of site personnel in proper waste management and chemical waste handling procedures.

·                    Provision of sufficient waste disposal points and regular collection for disposal.

·                    Appropriate measures to minimise windblown litter and dust during transportation of waste by either covering trucks or by transporting wastes in enclosed containers.

·                    Regular cleaning and maintenance programme for drainage systems, sumps and oil interceptors.

·                    A recording system for the amount of wastes generated, recycled and disposed of (including the disposal sites).

Waste Reduction Measures

5.2.9        Good management and control can prevent the generation of a significant amount of waste.  Waste reduction is best achieved at the planning and design stage, as well as by ensuring the implementation of good site practices.  Recommendations to achieve waste reduction include:  

·                    Sort C&D waste from demolition of the existing waterfront structures to recover recyclable portions such as metals.

·                    Segregation and storage of different types of waste in different containers, skips or stockpiles to enhance reuse or recycling of materials and their proper disposal.

·                    Encourage collection of aluminium cans, PET bottles and paper by providing separate labelled bins to enable these wastes to be segregated from other general refuse generated by the work force.

·                    Any unused chemicals or those with remaining functional capacity shall be recycled.

·                    Use of reusable non-timber formwork, such as in casting the tunnel box sections, to reduce the amount of C&D material.

·                    Proper storage and site practices to minimise the potential for damage or contamination of construction materials.

·                    Plan and stock construction materials carefully to minimise amount of waste generated and avoid unnecessary generation of waste.

5.2.10    In addition to the above measures, specific mitigation measures are recommended below for the identified waste arisings to minimise environmental impacts during handling, transportation and disposal of these wastes. 

General Refuse

5.2.11    General refuse should be stored in enclosed bins or compaction units separate from C&D material.  A licensed waste collector should be employed by the contractor to remove general refuse from the site, separately from C&D material.  Preferably an enclosed and covered area should be provided to reduce the occurrence of 'wind blown' light material. 

Chemical Wastes

5.2.12    After use, chemical wastes (for example, cleaning fluids, solvents, lubrication oil and fuel) should be handled according to the Code of Practice on the Packaging, Labelling and Storage of Chemical Wastes.  Spent chemicals should be collected by a licensed collector for disposal at the CWTF or other licensed facility, in accordance with the Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation.

Construction and Demolition Material

5.2.13    The C&D material should be sorted on-site into inert C&D material (that is, public fill) and C&D waste.  Considering that a large quantity of C&D material will be generated from the demolition works and excavation for the tunnel construction and in order to minimise the impact resulting from collection and transportation of material for off-site disposal, it is recommended that the inert C&D material should be re-used on-site in the reclamation works as far as practicable.  All the suitable (inert) material should be broken down to 250 mm in size for reuse as public fill and surcharge in the WDII reclamation.  C&D waste, such as wood, glass, plastic, steel and other metals should be reused or recycled and, as a last resort, disposed of to landfill.  It is recommended that a suitable area be designated to facilitate the sorting process and a temporary stockpiling area will be required for the separated materials.  The quantities of C&D materials generated is estimated to be approximately 2.915Mm3 and around 1.17Mm3 will be reused on-site and the remaining surplus of around 1.745Mm3 will be disposed off-site.

5.2.14    In order to monitor the disposal of public fill and C&D waste at public fill reception facilities and landfills, respectively, and to control fly tipping, a trip-ticket system should be included as one of the contractual requirements and implemented by an Environmental Team undertaking the Environmental Monitoring and Audit work.  An Independent Environmental Checker should be responsible for auditing the results of the system.


5.2.15    Bentonite slurries used in diaphragm wall and bore-pile construction should be reconditioned and reused wherever practicable.  The disposal of residual used bentonite slurry should follow the good practice guidelines stated in ProPECC PN 1/94 “Construction Site Drainage” and listed as follows:

·                   If the disposal of a certain residual quantity cannot be avoided, the used slurry may be disposed of at the marine spoil grounds subject to obtaining a marine dumping licence from EPD on a case-by-case basis.

·                   If the used bentonite slurry is intended to be disposed of through the public drainage system, it should be treated to the respective effluent standards applicable to foul sewers, storm drains or the receiving waters as set out in the Technical Memorandum of Standards for Effluents Discharged into Drainage and Sewerage Systems, Inland and Coastal Waters.

·                   If the used bentonite slurry is intended to be disposed to public fill reception facilities, it will be mixed with dry soil on site before disposal.

 



([1])              Agreement No. CE 74/98. Wan Chai Development Phase II Comprehensive Feasibility Study. EIA Report. July 2001.

([2])              (i)     Young, H. M. et al.  “The migration of contaminants through geosynthetic fabric containers utilized in dredging operation”.  Engineering Geology, 53 (1999), 167-176;

                    (ii)    Fleischer, P., Bowles, F. A.  “Turbidity currents generated by seafloor impact of geotextile fabric containers”.  Applied Ocean Research, 21 (1999) 215-217;

                    (iii)   Valent, P. J. et al.  “Engineering concepts for the placement of wastes on the abyssal seafloor”.  Journal of Marine Systems, 14 (1998) 273-288.

([3])              Agreement No. CE 54/2001 (CE). Wan Chai Development Phase II – Design & Construction.  Field Trials of Geosynthetic Containers – ACE Report.