5                     WATER QUALITY

Introduction

 

5.1               This section presents the assessment of the potential water quality impacts associated with the construction and operation of the proposed TM54SPS.

 

5.2               The main issue associated with water quality impacts during the operation phase is the potential of sewage overflow from TM54SPS in case of electricity shortage or pump failure. The design of the TM54SPS has incorporated a number of precautionary measures to minimize the risk of electricity shortage and pump failure. These measures will be described in this assessment.

 

5.3               Potential impacts on water quality resulting from site run-off during the construction phase are also addressed in this section. Good site practices and mitigation measures are recommended with reference to applicable legislation and guidelines pertinent to water quality.

 

 

Environmental Legislation and Guidelines

Water Pollution Control Ordinance (WPCO)

 

5.4               The Water Pollution Control Ordinance (Cap. 358), in existence since 1980, is the major legislation relating to the protection and control of water quality in Hong Kong.  According to the Ordinance and its subsidiary legislation, Hong Kong waters are divided into ten water control zones (WCZ).  Corresponding statements of Water Quality Objectives (WQO) are stipulated for different water regimes (marine waters, inland waters, bathing beaches subzones, secondary contact recreation subzones and fish culture subzones) in each of the WCZ based on their beneficial uses.  The study area is located within the North Western WCZ.  The WQOs of most relevance during the construction phase will be those for suspended solids (SS) and dissolved oxygen (DO), as listed in Table 5.1.

 

Table 5.1          Water Quality Objectives for Suspended Solids and Dissolved Oxygen at North Western Water Control Zone

Parameter

Part or Parts of Zone

Water Quality Objective

Suspended Solids (SS)

Tuen Mun (A, B and C) Subzones

Waste discharges shall not cause the annual medium of suspended solids to exceed 20 mg/L

Marine Waters

Waste discharge shall neither cause the natural ambient level to be raised by more than 30% nor give rise to accumulation of suspended solids which may adversely affect aquatic communities

Other Inland Waters

Water discharges shall not cause the annual median of suspended solids to exceed 25mg/L

Dissolved Oxygen (DO)

Tuen Mun (A, B and C) Subzones

Waste discharges shall not cause the level of dissolved oxygen to be less than 4 mg/L

Marine Waters

The level of DO shall not fall below 4 mg/L for 90% of the sampling occasions during the whole year.  In addition, the DO level shall not be less than 2 mg/L within 2 m of the seabed for 90% of the sampling occasions during the whole year. 

 

 

Technical Memorandum

 

5.5               Besides setting the WQOs, the WPCO controls effluent discharging into the WCZs through a licensing system.  The Technical Memorandum (TM) on Standards for Effluents Discharged into Drainage and Sewerage Systems, Inland and Coastal Waters issued under Section 21 of the WPCO gives guidance on the permissible effluent discharges based on the type of receiving waters (foul sewers, storm water drains, inland and coastal waters). The limits given in the TM control the physical, chemical and microbial quality of effluents.  Under the TM, effluents discharged into the sewerage system and the inshore and marine waters of the WCZ are subject to standards for particular volumes of discharge.  These standards are defined by EPD and specified in licence conditions for any new discharge within a WCZ.  For this Project, the TM standards for effluents discharged into the sewerage system and the inshore waters of the North Western WCZ will apply to the construction and operation phases, as shown in Table 1 and Table 10a, respectively, of the TM (as tabulated in Appendices 5.1 and 5.2).  Any effluent discharge during the construction and operation phases of the Project would be required to comply with these standards.

 

Practice Notes

 

5.6               A practice note (PN) for professional persons was issued by the EPD to provide environmental guidelines for handling and disposal of construction site discharges.  The ProPECC PN 1/94 “Construction Site Drainage” provides good practice guidelines for dealing with various types of discharge from a construction site.  Practices outlined in the PN should be followed as far as possible during construction to minimize the water quality impact due to construction site drainage.

 

 

Baseline Conditions

5.7               The only watercourse within the vicinity of the site is a nullah along Tsing Lun Road (Tsing Lun Nullah), approximately 250m to the east, which connects to the box culvert along Siu Hong Road which extends to the Tuen Mun Nullah.  The water quality of the Tuen Mun Nullah, also called the Tuen Mun River Channel, within the vicinity of the assessment area is well documented by the EPD routine river water quality monitoring programme.  There are six monitoring stations along the Tuen Mun River Channel (Figure 5.1).  A summary of the EPD monitoring data for these six stations is given in Table 5.2.

 

5.8               According to EPD’s Annual Report titled “2006 River Water Quality in Hong Kong”, the Tuen Mun River Channel is reported to have shown an upward water quality trend since the 1980s, including an increase in dissolved oxygen and reductions in organic matters, sewage bacteria, nutrients and metals.  The WQO compliance of the Tuen Mun River Channel was reported to be 85% in 2006 and five of the six monitoring stations on the river achieved gradings of ‘good’.  The E.coli levels in the river channel were reported to vary considerably from 13,000 to 180,000 cfu/100mL. The highest E.coli count of 180,000 cfu/100mL was recorded at the upstream monitoring station TN1 (with a grading of ‘bad’) and was reported to be due to pollution from unsewered villages, and the lowest E.coli count of 13,000 cfu/100mL was recorded at the upstream monitoring station TN2 located in another tributary with fewer unsewered premises.  E.coli counts of between 15,000 and 28,000 cfu/100mL were recorded at the monitoring stations TN3 to TN6 in the lower part of the river channel.

 

Table 5.2        Summary of Water Quality Monitoring Results for Tuen Mun River Channel in 2006

Parameter

Unit

TN1

TN2

TN3

TN4

TN5

TN6

Dissolved oxygen

mg/L

4.1

(2.0-7.1)

8.1

(6.5-9.6)

4.9

(3.1-6.9)

5.5

(3.6-9.5)

5.0

(3.4-7.6)

4.7

(2.3-7.1)

pH

 

7.6

(7.4-8.4)

7.5

(7.1-8.5)

7.6

(7.2-8.2)

7.6

(7.4-8.0)

7.6

(7.5-8.1)

7.4

(7.3-7.7)

Suspended solids

mg/L

15

(6-330)

16

(3-370)

11

(2-130)

10

(2-70)

7

(3-100)

3

(1-17)

5-day Biochemical Oxygen Demand

mg/L

23

(6-45)

1

(1-33)

4

(2-8)

4

(1-7)

4

(2-7)

3

(1-4)

Chemical Oxygen Demand

mg/L

35

(21-60)

9

(3-36)

20

(15-34)

18

(9-33)

20

(12-30)

19

(8-32)

Oil & grease

mg/L

15

(0.5-5.1)

0.5

(0.5-1.1)

0.5

(0.5-0.5)

0.5

(0.5-1.0)

0.5

(0.5-0.9)

0.5

(0.5-0.8)

Faecal coliforms

cfu/100mL

1,000,000

(430,000-5,900,000)

35,000

(370-560,000)

140,000

(7,100-1,300,000)

110,000

(4,600-830,000)

170,000

(29,000-600,000)

130,000

(16,000-720,000)

E.coli

cfu/100mL

180,000

(110,000-250,000)

13,000

(30-300,000)

18,000

(440-260,000)

20,000

(900-130,000)

28,000

(2,900-120,000)

15,000

(3,900-52,000)

Ammonia-nitrogen

mg/L

5.7

(0.51-10.00)

0.40

(0.16-5.00)

0.54

(0.14-1.00)

0.38

(0.15-1.00)

0.57

(0.13-0.85)

0.49

(0.12-0.90)

Nitrate-nitrogen

mg/L

0.77

(0.01-4.70)

0.81

(0.55-2.00)

0.36

(0.11-0.66)

0.36

(0.27-0.73)

0.35

(0.22-0.83)

0.27

(0.01-0.58)

Total Kjeldahl nitrogen, SP

mg/L

7.05

(1.90-14.00)

1.00

(0.27-5.80)

0.98

(0.53-1.60)

0.83

(0.43-1.50)

0.99

(0.53-1.40)

0.79

(0.43-1.30)

Ortho-phosphate

mg/L

0.74

(0.27-1.00)

0.11

(0.03-0.72)

0.05

(0.01-0.12)

0.06

(0.01-0.13)

0.05

(0.02-0.10)

0.06

(0.03-0.10)

Total phosphorus, SP

mg/L

1.05

(0.79-1.90)

0.19

(0.04-1.00)

0.12

(0.07-0.22)

0.13

(0.06-0.39)

0.13

(0.08-0.17)

0.10

(0.06-0.15)

Sulphide, SP

mg/L

0.04

(0.02-0.09)

0.02

(0.02-0.07)

0.02

(0.02-0.04)

0.02

(0.02-0.03)

0.02

(0.02-0.09)

0.02

(0.02-0.02)

Aluminium

µg/L

185

(100-1,600)

145

(50-1,300)

90

(50-540)

140

(80-470)

105

(80-510)

70

(50-130)

Cadmium

µg/L

0.1

(0.1-0.2)

0.1

(0.1-0.2)

0.1

(0.1-0.4)

0.1

(0.1-0.2)

0.1

(0.1-0.2)

0.1

(0.1-0.1)

Chromium

µg/L

1

(1-2)

1

(1-1)

1

(1-2)

1

(1-3)

1

(1-2)

1

(1-3)

Copper

µg/L

4

(3-17)

3

(1-9)

4

(1-10)

4

(3-10)

4

(2-12)

4

(3-7)

Lead

µg/L

3

(1-86)

3

(1-80)

1

(1-13)

1

(1-14)

1

(1-11)

1

(1-1)

Zinc

µg/L

30

(20-190)

30

(10-110)

15

(10-90)

15

(10-100)

20

(10-120)

20

(10-20)

Flow

L/s

119

(36-6,576)

79

(11-804)

NM

NM

NM

NM

Notes:     

1.  Data presented are in annual medians of monthly samples, except those for faecal coliforms and E.coli which are in annual geometric means. Figures in brackets are annual ranges.

2.  SP – soluble and particulate fractions (i.e. total value).

3.  NM indicates no measurement taken

 

 

Identification of Sensitive Receivers

Construction Phase

5.9               The only identified water sensitive receiver (WSR) within the assessment area of 300m from the project site boundary is the Tsing Lun Nullah along Tsing Lun Road. 

 

Operational Phase

5.10            In accordance with the EIA Study Brief, WSR downstream of the emergency sewage discharge location shall be included.  As advised by CEDD, the emergency overflow pipe would be connected to the existing nullah south of the TM54SPS or to the proposed box culvert to be constructed under the Phase 2 works of the Formation, Roads and Drains in Tuen Mun Area 54.  The future box culvert would be connected to the Tsing Lun Nullah along Tsing Lun Road and finally be connected to the existing box culvert along Siu Hong Road which extends to the Tuen Mun River Channel.  Since the proposed emergency overflow pipe would be connected to the future box culvert, approximately 600m away from the Tuen Mun River Channel, there would not be direct discharge to the Tuen Mun River Channel.  However, as advised by CEDD, the Tsing Lun Nullah would be replaced by box culvert under the infrastructural works of Site 2 and would not exist during operation of TM54SPS.  Therefore, Tsing Lun Nullah would not be the WSR during operation of the TM54SPS.  No WSR would be identified within the assessment area of 300m from the project site boundary.

 

 

Assessment Methodology

5.11            In accordance with the EIA Study Brief, the assessment area for the water quality impact assessment covers the area within 300 m of the Project site boundary.  As discussed above, the identified WSR would be the nullah along Tsing Lun Road during construction phase and no WSR would be identified during operation of TM54SPS. 

 

5.12            The water sensitive receivers that may be affected by the construction and operation activities for the Project have been identified.  Potential sources of water quality impact that may arise during the construction and operation phases of the Project are as described in the following section.  This task included identifying pollutants from point discharges and non-point sources that could affect the quality of surface water run-off.  All the identified sources of potential water quality impact were then evaluated and their impact significance determined.  The need for mitigation measures to reduce any identified adverse impacts on water quality to acceptable levels was determined.

 

 

Identification of Potential Impacts

Construction Phase

5.13            Potential sources of water quality impact associated with the proposed construction activities at the works areas of the Project have been identified and include:

          construction site runoff and drainage

          general construction activities

          sewage effluent produced by on-site workforce.

Operation Phase

5.14            The assessment of operational stage water quality impacts of the Project has addressed the potential issue of sewage bypass into the nearby future box culvert which would be connected to the box culvert to be constructed and finally be connected to the existing box culvert along Siu Hong Road which extends to the Tuen Mun River Channel (600m away from the future box culvert), such as prolonged power failure.

 

 

Evaluation of Potential Impacts

Construction Phase

Construction Site Runoff and Drainage

5.15            Runoff from the surface construction works areas may contain increased loads of sediments, other suspended solids and contaminants.  Potential sources of pollution from site drainage include:

          runoff from and erosion of exposed soil surfaces, earth working areas and stockpiles

          release of cement and other materials with rain wash

          wash water from dust suppression sprays

          fuel and lubricants from maintenance of construction vehicles and mechanical equipment.         

 

5.16            Sediment laden runoff particularly from works areas subjected to excavation or earth works, if uncontrolled, may carry pollutants (adsorbed onto the particle surfaces) into the nullah along Tsing Lun Road (Tsing Lun Nullah).

 

5.17            As a good site practice, mitigation measures should be implemented to control construction site runoff and drainage from the works areas, and to prevent runoff and drainage water with high levels of suspended solids from entering the Tsing Lun Nullah.  With the implementation of adequate construction site drainage and provision of sediment removal facilities as described in Section 5.26, it is anticipated that unacceptable water quality impacts would not arise.  The construction phase discharge would be collected by the temporary drainage system installed by the Contractor and then treated or desilted on-site before discharging to the storm water drain.  The contractor would be required to obtain a license from EPD for discharge to the public drainage system.

 

5.18            No adverse water quality impacts would be expected at the Tuen Mun Typhoon Shelter and gazetted bathing beaches at Castle Peak Bay located at the mouth of Tuen Mun River Channel given the considerable distance of these WSR from the Project site (more than 3.5 km away).  All construction works for the Project are minor in scale and would take place in-land and within the proposed works area at Site 4A.  With the implementation of adequate construction site drainage and provision of silt removal facilities at the works area as described in Section 5.26, there would not be any direct water quality impacts on the Tsing Lun Nullah and the upstream section of the Tuen Mun River Channel. 

General Construction Activities

5.19            On-site construction activities may cause water pollution from the following:

          uncontrolled discharge of debris and rubbish such as packaging, construction materials and refuse

          spillages of liquids stored on-site, such as oil, diesel and solvents etc.

 

5.20            Good construction and site management practices should be observed, as detailed in Section 5.27 - 5.28, to ensure that litter, fuels and solvents do not enter the public drainage system

Sewage Effluent from Construction Workforce

5.21            Domestic sewage would be generated from the workforce during the construction phase. However, portable chemical toilets can be installed within the construction site. The Contractor will have the responsibility to ensure that chemical toilets are used and properly maintained, and that licensed Contractors are employed to collect and dispose of the waste off-site at approved locations.  Therefore, adverse water quality impacts would not be expected.

 

Operation Phase

 

5.22            The potential for water quality impacts in the operation phase is mainly associated with the possibility of sewage overflow from TM54SPS due to the events of pump failure and power supply failure.  Various precautionary measures are proposed to be incorporated in the design of TM54SPS. These measures include:

          A standby pump will be provided to cater for breakdown and maintenance of the duty pump in order to avoid sewage bypass

          Backup power supply in the form of dual power supply will be provided to secure electrical power supply

          An alarm would be installed to signal emergency high water level in the wet well

 

5.23            With the incorporation of the above preventive measures into the design of TM54SPS, the possibility of emergency sewage bypass would be extremely remote.

 

5.24            The proposed discharge point of emergency bypass from the TM54SPS is the nearby future box culvert to be constructed under Phase 2 of the proposed development at Tuen Mun Area 54 or the existing nullah south of the TM54SPS.  The overflow bypass from TM54SPS would discharge into the box culvert to reduce any significant aesthetic impact.  The future box culvert connects to the box culvert to be constructed under the infrastructural works of Site 2 and finally connects to the existing box culvert along Siu Hong Road which extends to the Tuen Mun River Channel.  On the other hand, the overflow bypass from TM54SPS would discharge into the existing nullah located south of the TM54SPS which connects to the Tuen Mun River Channel directly.  The Tuen Mun Typhoon Shelter and the gazetted bathing beaches near the mouth of the Tuen Mun River Channel are located approximately 3 km downstream from the connection point of the box culvert along Siu Hong Road to the Tuen Mun River Channel.  Given this considerable separation distance and taking into account the dilution effect within the Tuen Mun River Channel, pollution concentrations at the point where emergency discharge enter the upstream location of Tuen Mun River Channel would be lower at the outlet of the channel.  Therefore, adverse water quality impacts on the distant typhoon shelter and bathing beaches would not be envisaged during the operational phase.  In addition to the extremely remote possibility of sewage bypass, the duration of any emergency bypass would be expected to be very short-term. If TM54SPS breakdown due to power supply failure ever happened, it is expected that the power supply and hence the operation of TM54SPS should be able to recover in hours as normally experienced in Hong Kong.

 

Mitigation Measures

5.25            Proposed mitigation measures for containing and minimizing water quality impacts are summarised below.

 

 

Construction Phase

Construction Site Run-off and Drainage

5.26            The site practices outlined in ProPECC PN 1/94 “Construction Site Drainage” should be followed as far as practicable in order to minimise surface runoff and the chance of erosion.  The following measures are recommended to protect water quality of the nearby Tsing Lun Nullah, and when properly implemented should be sufficient to adequately control site discharges so as to avoid water quality impacts:

          At the start of site establishment, perimeter cut-off drains to direct off-site water around the site should be constructed with internal drainage works and erosion and sedimentation control facilities implemented.  Channels (both temporary and permanent drainage pipes and culverts), earth bunds or sand bag barriers should be provided on site to direct storm water to silt removal facilities.  The design of the temporary on-site drainage system will be undertaken by the contractor prior to the commencement of construction.

          Sand/silt removal facilities such as sand/silt traps and sediment basins should be provided to remove sand/silt particles from runoff to meet the requirements of the Technical Memorandum standard under the Water Pollution Control Ordinance.  The design of efficient silt removal facilities should be based on the guidelines in Appendix A1 of ProPECC PN 1/94, which states that the retention time for silt/sand traps should be 5 minutes under maximum flow conditions.  The detailed design of the sand/silt traps shall be undertaken by the contractor prior to the commencement of construction.

          All drainage facilities and erosion and sediment control structures should be regularly inspected and maintained to ensure proper and efficient operation at all times and particularly during rainstorms.  Deposited silt and grit should be regularly removed, at the onset of and after each rainstorm to ensure that these facilities are functioning properly at all times.

          Measures should be taken to minimize the ingress of site drainage into excavations.  Water pumped out from foundation excavations should be discharged into storm drains via silt removal facilities.

          If surface excavation works cannot be avoided during the wet season (April to September), temporarily exposed slope/soil surfaces should be covered by a tarpaulin or other means, as far as practicable, and temporary access roads should be protected by crushed stone or gravel, as excavation proceeds. Interception channels should be provided (e.g. along the crest/edge of the excavation) to prevent storm runoff from washing across exposed soil surfaces.  Arrangements should always be in place to ensure that adequate surface protection measures can be safely carried out well before the arrival of a rainstorm.  Other measures that need to be implemented before, during and after rainstorms are summarized in ProPECC PN 1/94.

          All vehicles and plant should be cleaned before leaving a construction site to ensure no earth, mud, debris and the like is deposited by them on roads.  An adequately designed and sited wheel washing facility should be provided at every construction site exit where practicable.  Wash-water should have sand and silt settled out and removed at least on a weekly basis to ensure the continued efficiency of the process.  The section of access road leading to, and exiting from, the wheel-wash bay to the public road should be paved with sufficient backfall toward the wheel-wash bay to prevent vehicle tracking of soil and silty water to public roads and drains.

          Open stockpiles of construction materials or construction wastes on-site should be covered with tarpaulin or similar fabric during rainstorms.

General Construction Activities

5.27            Debris and refuse generated on-site should be collected, handled and disposed of properly to avoid entering any nearby storm water drain.  Stockpiles of cement and other construction materials should be kept covered when not being used.

 

5.28            Oils and fuels should only be used and stored in designated areas which have pollution prevention facilities.  To prevent spillage of fuels and solvents to any nearby storm water drain, all fuel tanks and storage areas should be provided with locks and be sited on sealed areas, within bunds of a capacity equal to 110% of the storage capacity of the largest tank.  The bund should be drained of rainwater after a rain event.

Sewage from Construction Workforce

5.29            Temporary sanitary facilities, such as portable chemical toilets, should be employed on-site where necessary to handle sewage from the workforce.  A licensed contractor would be responsible for appropriate disposal of waste matter and maintenance of these facilities.

 

 

Operation Phase

 

5.30            As discussed in Section 5.22, various precautionary measures are proposed to be incorporated in the design of TM54SPS to avoid emergency bypass of sewage to the maximum practicable extent.  These measures include:

          A standby pump will be provided to cater for breakdown and maintenance of the three duty pumps in order to avoid sewage bypass

          Backup power supply in the form of dual power supply will be provided to secure electrical power supply

          An alarm would be installed to signal emergency high water level in the wet well

          Regular maintenance and checking of plant equipment to prevent equipment failure

5.31            A hand-held screen should be provided to cover the lower half of the opening of the overflow bypass.  This would prevent the discharge of floating solids into receiving waterbodies (e.g. Tuen Mun River Channel) as far as practicable whilst ensuring flooding at the facilities would not occur even if the screen is blocked.

 

5.32            A contingency plan to deal with the emergency discharges that may occur during the operation of the TM54SPS should be developed before commissioning of the sewage pumping station, including the following items:

          Locations of the sensitive receivers in the vicinity of the emergency discharges at North Western waters and Tuen Mun River Channel;

          A list of relevant government bodies to be informed and to provide assistance in the event of emergency discharge, including key contact persons and telephone numbers;

          Reporting procedures required in the event of emergency discharge; and

          Procedures listing the most cost-effective means in rectifying the breakdown of the TM54SPS in order to minimize the discharge duration.

 

Evaluation of Residual Impact

5.33            With the full implementation of the recommended mitigation measures for the construction phase of the proposed Project, no unacceptable residual impacts on water quality are expected.  It is recommended that regular audit of the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures at the works area be carried out during the construction phase.  With the incorporation of all the proposed precautionary measures in the design of TM54SPS, minimal residual operational water quality impact is expected.

 

Environmental Monitoring and Audit Requirements

5.34            Since there would not be any direct impact on the identified WSR arising from the construction activities of the Project, water quality monitoring is not considered necessary during the construction phase.  However, it is recommended that regular site inspections be undertaken to inspect the construction activities and works area in order to ensure the recommended mitigation measures are properly implemented.

 

Conclusion

5.35            The key issue in terms of water quality during the construction phase of the Project would be the potential for release of sediment-laden run-off from surface works areas.  Minimisation of water quality deterioration could be achieved through implementing adequate mitigation measures such as control measures on site run-off and drainage from the works areas to minimise construction site run-off.  Proper site management and good housekeeping practices would also be required to ensure that construction wastes and other construction-related materials would not enter the Tsing Lun Nullah.  Sewage effluent arising from the construction workforce would also be handled through provision of portable toilets.

 

5.36            With the implementation of these recommended mitigation measures, the construction works for the Project would not be expected to result in unacceptable impacts on water quality.  Site inspections should be undertaken routinely to inspect the works areas in order to ensure the recommended mitigation measures are properly implemented.

 

5.37            In view of the potential adverse effect of emergency sewage bypass on the quality of the receiving waters of the Tuen Mun River Channel, various precautionary measures are proposed to be incorporated in the design of TM54SPS to avoid emergency bypass of sewage to the maximum practicable extent.  With the incorporation of these proposed precautionary measures, the possibility of emergency sewage bypass would be extremely remote.