16.               Environmental monitoring and audit

Introduction

16.1            This section further elaborates the requirements of environmental monitoring and audit (EM&A) for the construction and operation of the Project, based on the assessment results of various issues.  The following sections summarize the recommended EM&A requirements.  Details of the EM&A programme are presented in a stand-alone EM&A Manual issued separately. 

Ecological Impact

16.2            To detect changes and to monitor the effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures, ecological monitoring should be conducted for any works where adverse ecological impacts (without mitigation measures in place) and any uncertainties are anticipated.

Terrestrial Ecology

16.3            The implementation of the ecological mitigation measures described in Table 18.1 should be checked as part of the EM&A procedures during the construction period to confirm the recommended measures are properly in place.

Ecological Impact Monitoring

16.4            Mitigation measures have been proposed under this Project to control any potential indirect impact to the avifauna utilizing areas of conservation interest which are sensitive to disturbance.  Impact monitoring should therefore be conducted during construction phase to monitor the effectiveness of proposed mitigation measures and detect any unpredicted indirect ecological impacts arising from the proposed Project.  Remedial actions can then be recommended, where appropriate, based on the impact monitoring results. 

16.5            Ecological impact monitoring focusing on habitats and species of conservation interest should be conducted during the construction phase at the MPV, TPP, SSS / ERS, PHV, and TUW sites where a number of avifauna of conservation interest (e.g. overwintering bird, Greater Painted-snipe) and areas of conservation interest (e.g. country parks, conservation areas, and wetlands) were recorded. 

16.6            Avifaunal communities should be surveyed quantitatively along transects.  Birds heard or seen along the transects should be identified to species and counted.  The nature of construction works within works area conducting during each impact monitoring visit should also be recorded.  The quantitative monitoring results should be compared to pre-construction condition.  The impact monitoring results should be undertaken by qualified ecologist(s) with relevant working experience.  Should any unpredicted indirect ecological impacts arising from the proposed Project be detected, remedial measures should be developed and implemented by the Contractor.  The implementation details of the impact monitoring programme should be described in ecological monitoring plan for EPD approval before commencement of construction activities.  The location, frequency and duration of impact monitoring are provided in the EM&A Manual.

Monitoring of Mitigation Stream Habitats

16.7            Mitigation stream habitats will be provided within the scheme boundary of the SSS / ERS site in the operational phase.  It is anticipated that the mitigation stream habitats would provide habitats of similar ecological value and function to the wildlife utilising the existing watercourse habitats.  Prior to commencement of channel works, the ecological habitat management plan should be prepared to outline the operational phase ecological monitoring requirements for the mitigation stream habitats.

Monitoring of Impact from Groundwater Drawdown

16.8            Groundwater levels will be monitored along the whole Project alignment in pre-construction and construction stages as part of the comprehensive groundwater monitoring strategy (details refer to EIA Report Appendix 11.8B Hydrogeological Impact Assessment).  A monitoring and emergency response plan (to be prepared by the Contractor), in relation to potential impacts due to groundwater drawdown, will form part of the EM&A requirement in the EM&A Manual subject to approval by EPD and AFCD before commencement of the tunnelling and MPV construction in Mai Po area.  The plan should include, but not be limited to, details of monitoring locations and programme, a mechanism to monitor the implication from the works to the groundwater system and fish ponds including their water levels, action levels and emergency responses such as immediate action, remedial action and investigation.

Monitoring of Impact from Noise and Vibration

16.9            A monitoring and emergency response plan (to be prepared by the Contractor), in relation to potential impacts on fishponds in Mai Po Area due to noise / vibration, will form part of the EM&A requirement in the EM&A Manual subject to approval by EPD and AFCD before commencement of the tunnelling and MPV construction in Mai Po area.  

Marine Ecology

16.10        The implementation of the ecological mitigation measures described in Table 18.1 should be checked as part of the EM&A procedures during the construction period to confirm the recommended measures are properly in place. 

Fisheries Impact

16.11        Monitoring programme should be implemented to monitor impacts from groundwater drawdown, construction noise, and vibration.  Details of monitoring programme refer to Section 16.8 to 16.9. 

Airborne Noise Impact

Construction Phase

16.12        Construction noise impacts from this Project would be expected at NSRs identified in this EIA.  Appropriate mitigation measures would be required in order to alleviate the impacts to meet the EIAO-TM criteria.  Noise monitoring during construction phase needs to be carried out to ensure that such mitigation measures would be implemented properly.

16.13        Noise monitoring should be carried out at the designated monitoring stations, and measurement should be undertaken at a minimum logging interval of 30 minutes.  Prior to the commencement of the Project, baseline monitoring should be measured for a continuous period of at least 14 consecutive days at a minimum logging interval of 30 minutes for daytime.  During impact monitoring, noise measurement should be conducted at the designated monitoring locations once a week.  Ad hoc noise monitoring should also be carried out if necessary.  Details of the EM&A programme are provided in a stand-alone EM&A Manual. 

Operation Phase

16.14        Prior to the operation phase of the Project, a noise commissioning test should be conducted by the Contractor to check compliance of the operational airborne railway and fixed plant noise levels with the stipulated noise criteria.  The testing results should be checked and verified by the Environmental Team and Independent Environmental Checker respectively. 

Ground-borne Noise Impact

Construction Phase

16.15        The predicted ground-borne noise levels comply with the stipulated daytime noise criteria, except at four sensitive receivers, where TBM operation would induce noise levels exceeding the noise criteria of 65 dB(A).  Monitoring at the time of TBM operation will therefore be required to confirm and monitor the ground-borne noise levels.  Where it is possible that the 65dB(A) limit will be exceeded, scheduling of works and consultation with affected parties should be conducted to minimise the impact. 

16.16        Prior to the final design of the trackform and the extent of each type of trackform, and after the proposed train in operation outside Hong Kong, tests of the FDL of the train will be carried out to update the ground-borne noise prediction and the recommendation on mitigation measures as necessary.

16.17        The vibration borehole testing will be carried out at two carefully selected locations along the proposed tunnel alignment prior to the commencement of construction works to determine the LSR values under certain geological conditions.  This will also allow updating of the ground-borne noise predictions and the recommendation on mitigation measures as necessary.

16.18        An EM&A programme is recommended to be developed with details of the EM&A requirements are provided in a stand-alone EM&A Manual.

Operation Phase

16.19        Prior to the operation phase of the Project, a noise commissioning test should be conducted to check the compliance of the operational ground-borne noise levels with the EIAO-TM noise criteria.  Details of the test requirements are provided in a stand-alone EM&A Manual.

Landscape and Visual Impact

Construction Phase

16.20        The landscape and visual mitigation measures should be incorporated in the detailed design, so as to ensure the effectiveness of the mitigation measures described in Table 18.1.  Any changes to the mitigation measures that may be recommended to match the baseline review result or to match the ongoing EM&A should also be incorporated in the detailed design.

16.21        The design, implementation and maintenance of mitigation measures should be checked regularly to ensure that they are fully realised and compliance with the intended aims of the measures.  Any potential conflicts among the proposed mitigation measures, the project works, and operational requirements should also be identified and resolved early. 

16.22        Landscape proposals and details of architectural design, chromatic treatment and visual and landscape mitigation measures for all above ground structures, including station entrances and ventilation buildings, to demonstrate that they would be sensibly designed in a manner that responds to the existing urban context. 

16.23        The extent of the agreed works areas should be regularly checked during the construction phase.  Any trespass by the Contractor outside the limit of the works leading to any damages to existing trees should be reported to the IEC, ET and ER.                       

16.24        The ET should also audit the operational measures recommended in the EIA study to ensure that they are fully implemented by the Contractor in accordance with the Project design during the construction phase.

Operation Phase

16.25        As the operation landscape and visual mitigation measures would be provided during the construction phase, and therefore no specific EM&A requirement is required during operation phase.

Cultural Heritage Impact                                                                                     

Construction Phase

Terrestrial Archaeology

16.26        A further archaeological investigation is recommended to be undertaken within inaccessible areas in SSS and TPP. The purpose of this investigation is to ascertain archaeological potential in these inaccessible areas. Should significance archaeological features be discovered, a rescue excavation should be considered.  The further archaeological investigation process entails the supervision of the archaeological excavation works within the identified area by qualified archaeologists to identify any archaeological material or features.

16.27        Rescue excavation is also recommended at the southern portion of SSS, in which the archaeological remains discovered would be preserved by detailed record.  

16.28        An Archaeological Action Plan (AAP) should be prepared to present the details of proposed further archaeological investigation, rescue excavation and watching brief.  This AAP should be submitted to AMO and relevant authority for approval.

16.29        Lung Kwu Sheung Tan Barging Point and its associated access road is located within a known archaeological site, and therefore regular site audit should be conducted during the construction of barging point to check that no excavation works is carried out at the archaeological deposit area.  Restriction on the extension of TPP is also recommended to avoid any potential impact to relic discovered area in Tai Kong Po.

Marine Archeology

16.30        No specific EM&A programme is required for marine archeological resources, with no archaeological resources recorded within the proposed dredging area in Lung Kwu Sheung Tan. 

Built Heritage

16.31        Sensibly designed screen hoardings should be used to reduce potential visual impact on built heritage resources.

16.32        Vibration levels from the proposed blasting and excavation activities should be controlled within a peak particle velocity (ppv) limit of 25mm/s to prevent potential vibration impact to all identified built heritage resources.

16.33        Vibration monitoring should be installed at the identified built heritage structures in Ex-Lai Chi Kok Hospital (LCKH) during blasting.  The vibration level should not exceed the proposed vibration limit of ppv 25mm/s measured inside buildings.  The location and installation of the monitoring stations should be discussed and agreed in advance with AMO, Hong Kong Institution for Promotion of Chinese Culture (the “NPO”, selected organization for the Revitalisation Scheme), the Commissioner for Heritage’s Office and relevant parties before installation.   Monitoring stations should be set up before commencement of blasting and to the satisfaction of relevant authorities. Remedial measures in case of exceeding the vibration limit should be planned and agreed with AMO.  The monitoring results should be reported in monthly EM&A reports as necessary. 

16.34        Further condition survey and consolidation works at LCKH (i.e. Blocks P, Q, W and the inaccessible area), if required, should be conducted before commencement of construction.

16.35        If consent is given by the house owner of Cheung Yuen (LET-06), a condition survey and vibration monitoring will be conducted at Cheung Yuen prior to the commencement of works in SSS and during excavation works being conducted within 50m radius from the house, respectively.

16.36        The affected earth shrines located within the works boundary (NHL-04, LET-07 and TKP-02) should be relocated before commencement of construction. The relocation of earth shrines will be conducted by local villagers.

Operational Phase

16.37        No adverse impact on cultural heritage resources is anticipated, and therefore Mitigation measures recommended in relation to visual impacts would generally ameliorate potential impacts to the surrounding environment including built heritage.

Land Contamination

16.38        Land remediation works should be carried out in accordance with the approved Contamination Assessment Report (CAR) and Remediation Action Plan (RAP) prior to the commencement of construction works at the contaminated areas.

16.39        Remediation Report (RR) for identified contaminated site(s) upon completion of remediation should be prepared by the Land Contamination Specialist to report the remediation process and demonstrate that contaminated soils are all removed, properly handled, decontaminated and re-instated. 

16.40        With implementation of recommendations given in approved RAP, specific EM&A requirement is not required.

Waste Management Implications

16.41        Waste management will be the contractor’s responsibility to ensure that all wastes produced during the construction of the Project are handled, stored and disposed of in accordance with the recommended good waste management practices and EPD’s regulations and requirements.  The mitigation measures recommended in Table 18.1 should form the basis of the site Waste Management Plan to be developed by the Contractor during the construction stage.

16.42        It is recommended that the waste arisings generated during the construction activities should be audited regularly by ET to determine if wastes are being managed in accordance with approved procedures and the site Waste Management Plan.  The audit should look at all aspects of on-site waste management practices including waste generation, storage, recycling, transport and disposal.  Apart from site inspection, documents including licences, permits, disposal and recycling records should be reviewed and audited for compliance with the legislation and Contract requirements.  In addition, the routine site inspections should check the implementation of the recommended good site practices and other waste management mitigation measures.

Water Quality Impact

Construction Phase

Land-based Activities

16.43        The key issue from the land-based construction activities would be the potential for release of sediment-laden water from surface works areas, open cut excavation and tunnelling works.  The water quality assessment concluded that minimisation of water quality deterioration from land-based construction activities could be achieved through implementing adequate mitigation measures.    It is recommended that regular site inspections should be undertaken to inspect the construction activities and works areas in order to ensure the recommended mitigation measures are properly implemented.

Hydrogeological Impact

16.44        Groundwater monitoring is recommended during the construction phase as one of the precautionary measures to minimize any unacceptable groundwater drawdown. Piezometers will be installed all along the alignment and at locations associated with particular sensitive receptors (e.g. near Mai Po area) that have been identified. A baseline of data will therefore be available prior to the commencement of construction.  This instrumentation will form the basis of the construction monitoring programme, but will be supplemented as necessary prior to the start of construction. Monitoring of the groundwater table will be undertaken during the progress of the tunneling works to confirm that the groundwater levels do not deviate significantly from the observed or recorded historical seasonal fluctuations. A detailed groundwater monitoring programme should be developed in detailed design stage to monitor both the proposed works and the impact of those works on the adjacent area.

Dredging of Marine Sediment

16.45        The water quality impact generated from the proposed dredging works has been assessed to be localized and minor.  No marine water quality monitoring is considered necessary.

Operation Phase

16.46        No adverse water quality impact was identified during the operational phase with proper implementation of the recommended mitigation measures.  Operation phase water quality monitoring is therefore considered not necessary.

Air Quality Impact

Construction Phase

16.47        With the implementation of the dust suppression measures stipulated in the Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation, good site practices and proposed mitigation measures, no adverse dust impact would be expected at the ASRs in the vicinity of the construction sites.  Dust monitoring requirements are recommended in the EM&A Manual to ensure the efficacy of the control measures.  Details of the EM&A programme are provided in a stand-alone EM&A Manual.

Operation Phase

16.48         No adverse air quality or implication from the operation of Project and diesel locomotives at SSS.  Environmental monitoring is considered unnecessary.

Hazard to Life

16.49        Blasting activities regarding storage and transport of explosives should be supervised and audited by competent site staff to ensure strict compliance with the blasting permit conditions.

Landfill Gas Hazard     

16.50        As the potential landfill gas risk posed by the GDBL and SLSL to the Barging Point and the Nursery Site will be very low, no monitoring will be required at the Barging Point and the Nursery Site during the construction of the Project tunnels.  It should be noted that the Barging Point and Nursery Site will not be required during the operation of the Project. 

Construction Phase

16.51        During the construction of the Project tunnels within the Consultation Zone of the NTML, monitoring of methane, carbon dioxide and oxygen should be carried out using appropriately calibrated portable gas detection equipment.  The exact frequency of monitoring should be determined prior to the commencement of works, but should be at least once per day, and be carried out by a suitably qualified or trained person before starting the work of the day.  Measurements should be recorded and kept as a record of safe working conditions with copies of the site diary and submitted to the Engineer for approval.  All measurements taken are to include at a minimum the areas where personnel are operating as well as the highest and lowest elevations within the tunnels.  Measurements are to be carried out with the sensor located not greater than 10mm from the exposed rock surface and at locations where landfill gas has the highest potential to enter the tunnels such as highly fissured areas, dykes, faults, etc.

16.52        A tunnel walkover survey to test for presence of flammable gas at all joints and cracks, if identified, shall be conducted upon completion of the tunnel work within the NTML Consultation Zone.  Rectifications, such as sealing of cracks and inspection of tunnel seals, shall be carried out for any signs of the presence of flammable gas.  The survey should be conducted under non-ventilated condition and before starting the work of the day.

16.53        Weekly monitoring of methane, carbon dioxide and oxygen in the form of a walkover survey at 20m intervals for section of tunnels under NTML and 50m interval within the NTML Consultation Zone should be conducted after completion of the tunnel construction works and not less than 3 months before commencement of operation.  The survey shall be conducted under non-ventilated condition and before starting the work of the day.  Should methane concentration be higher than 10% LEL, mechanical ventilation is required to be switched on 30 minutes before the starting the work of the day and throughout the working day.  In addition, the monitoring frequency should be increased to daily.  If the situation persists in three consecutive occasions, inspection of tunnel seals should be carried out to identify the location of potential gas ingress.  Rectifications, such as sealing of cracks, shall be carried out.  The daily monitoring requirement can be resumed to weekly if the concentration of methane is consistently below 10% LEL in 7 consecutive days and the ventilation requirement can be resumed to normal. 

16.54        A summary of the monitoring results shall be submitted to EPD for record before the commencement of operational phase.  The results shall be reviewed and agreed with EPD before the commencement of operation to determine the monitoring requirements during the operational phase.

Operation Phase

16.55        The monitoring requirement during the operational phase shall be discussed with EPD before the commencement of operation.  Weekly monitoring of methane, carbon dioxide and oxygen in the form of a walkover survey at 20m intervals for section of tunnels under NTML and 50m interval within the NTML Consultation Zone is tentatively proposed ([1]).  The survey should be conducted under non-ventilated condition and before the first train operates and start-up of ventilation, if applicable.  Should methane concentration be higher than 10% LEL, mechanical ventilation is required to be switched on at least 30 minutes before the first train operates to sufficiently dilute the concentration of methane to well below the lower explosive limit to ensure that no explosion will occur when the trains pass through the tunnel until the end of the daily operation.  The monitoring frequency should be increased to daily.  If the situation persists in three consecutive occasions, inspection of tunnel seals should be carried out to identify the location of potential gas ingress.  Rectifications, such as sealing of cracks, shall be carried out.  The daily monitoring requirement can be resumed to weekly if the concentration of methane is consistently below 10% LEL in 7 consecutive days and the mechanical ventilation requirement can be resumed back to normal condition. 

16.56        A summary of the monitoring results should be submitted to EPD for record at the end of the monitoring period. 

16.57        It is recommended that an annual walkover survey in the tunnels within the Consultation Zone of the NTML should be conducted to test for the presence of flammable gas at joints and cracks, if identified.  Rectifications, such as sealing of cracks and inspection of tunnel seals, shall be carried out for any signs of presence of flammable gas. The survey should be conducted under non-ventilated condition and before the first train operates and start-up of ventilation, if applicable. 

Impact on Restored Ngau Tam Mei Landfill     

16.58        The assessment shows that the construction and operation of the Project will not cause adverse impact on the restored NTML and the restored NTML will not have adverse impact on the construction and operation of the Project.  Hence, monitoring is not required.  


 



([1]) The requirement to implement this measure is subject to the findings of the review of landfill gas monitoring data with EPD before the commencement of operation.