Home  |    Print

 

3.                  WATER QUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT

 

3.1              Introduction

 

3.1.1        This Chapter details the current condition of the water bodies within the Study Area, and describes the potential impacts on water quality during the construction phase of the Project. Mitigation measures are proposed and the residual impacts after implementation of these measures are evaluated.

 

3.1.2        No water quality impact is envisaged for the fresh water main during the operational phase.

 

3.2              Environmental Legislation, Policies, Standards and Criteria

 

3.2.1        The assessment has been based on the criteria and guidelines for evaluation and assessment of water quality impact stated in Annexes 6 and 14 of the Technical Memorandum on EIA Process (EIAO-TM) and the EIA study brief.

 

3.2.2        The Water Pollution Control Ordinance (WPCO) (Cap.358) enacted in 1980 is the principal legislation controlling water quality in Hong Kong along with Annexes 6 and 14 of the EIAO-TM. Under the WPCO, Hong Kong waters are classified into Water Control Zones (WCZs) and statutory Water Quality Objectives (WQOs) are specified for each WCZ. This Project falls within the catchment of Southern WCZ. The WQOs for the Southern WCZ are presented in Table 3.1.

 

Table 3.1

Water Quality Objectives for Southern WCZ

 

Water Quality Objectives

Part or Parts of Zone

A.   AESTHETIC APPEARANCE

 

(a)     Waste discharges shall cause no objectionable odours or discolouration of the water.

Whole Zone

(b)     Tarry residues, floating wood, articles made of glass, plastic, rubber or of any other substance should be absent.

Whole Zone

(c)     Mineral oil should not be visible on the surface. Surfactants should not give rise to a lasting foam.

Whole Zone

(d)     There should be no recognisable sewage-derived debris.

Whole Zone

(e)     Floating, submerged and semi-submerged objects of a size likely to interfere with the free movement of vessels, or cause damage to vessels, should be absent.

Whole Zone

(f)      Waste discharges shall not cause the water to contain substances which settle to form objectionable deposits.

Whole Zone

B.   BACTERIA

 

(a)     The level of Escherichia coli should not exceed 610 per 1000 mL, calculated as the geometric mean of all samples collected in one calendar year.

Secondary Contact Recreation Subzones and Fish Culture Subzones

(b)    The level of Escherichia coli should not exceed 180 per 100 mL, calculated as the geometric mean of all samples collected from March to October inclusive in one calendar year. Samples should be taken at least 3 times in a calendar month at intervals of between 3 and 14 days.

Bathing Beach Subzones

C.   DISSOLVED OXYGEN

 

(a)     Waste discharges shall not cause the level of dissolved oxygen to fall below 4 milligrams per litre for 90% of the sampling occasions during the year; values should be calculated as the water column average (arithmetic mean of at least 3 measurements at 1 metre below surface, mid-depth, and 1 metre above seabed). In addition, the concentration of dissolved oxygen should not be less than 2 milligrams per litre within 2 metres of the seabed for 90% of the sampling occasions during the year.

Marine waters excepting Fish Culture Subzones

(b)    The dissolved oxygen level should not be less than 5 milligrams per litre for 90% of the sampling occasions during the year; values should be calculated as water column average (arithmetic mean of at least 3 measurements at 1 metre below surface, mid-depth and 1 metre above seabed). In addition, the concentration of dissolved oxygen should not be less than 2 milligrams per litre within 2 metres of the seabed for 90% of the sampling occasions during the year.

Fish Culture Subzones

(c)     Waste discharges shall not cause the level of dissolved oxygen to be less than 4 milligrams per litre.

Inland waters of the Zone

D.   pH

 

(a)     The pH of the water should be within the range of 6.5-8.5 units. In addition, waste discharges shall not cause the natural pH range to be extended by more than 0.2 units.

Marine waters excepting Bathing Beach Subzones; Mui Wo (A), Mui Wo (B), Miu Wo (C), Mui Wo (E) and Mui Wo (F) Subzones

(b)    The pH of the water should be within the range of 6.0-9.0 units.

Mui Wo (D) Sub-zone and other inland waters

(c)     The pH of the water should be within the range of 6.0-9.0 units for 95% of samples. In addition, waste discharges shall not cause the natural pH range to be extended by more than 0.5 units.

Bathing Beach Subzones

E.   TEMPERATURE

 

Waste discharges shall not cause the natural daily temperature range to change by more than 2.0 degrees Celsius.

Whole zone

F.   SALINITY

 

Waste discharges shall not cause the natural ambient salinity level to change by more than 10%.

 

Whole Zone

G.   SUSPENDED SOLIDS

 

(a)     Waste discharges shall neither cause the natural ambient level to be raised by 30% nor give rise to accumulation of suspended solids which may adversely affect aquatic communities.

Marine waters

(b)    Waste discharges shall not cause the annual median of suspended solids to exceed 20 milligrams per litre.

Mui Wo (A), Mui Wo (B), Mui Wo (C), Mui Wo (E) and Mui Wo (F) Subzones

(c)     Waste discharges shall not cause the annual median of suspended solids to exceed 25 milligrams per litre.

Mui Wo (D) Subzone and other inland waters

H.   AMMONIA

 

The ammonia nitrogen level should not be more than 0.021 milligram per litre, calculated as the annual average (arithmetic mean), as unionised form.

Whole zone

I.   NUTRIENTS

 

(a)     Nutrients shall not be present in quantities sufficient to cause excessive or nuisance growth of algae or other aquatic plants.

Marine waters

(b)    Without limiting the generality of objective (a) above, the level of inorganic nitrogen should not exceed 0.1 milligram per litre, expressed as annual water column average (arithmetic mean of at least 3 measurements at 1 metre below surface, mid-depth and 1 metre above seabed).

Marine waters

J.   5-DAY BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND

 

Waste discharges shall not cause the 5-day biochemical oxygen demand to exceed 5 milligrams per litre.

Inland waters of the Zone

K.   CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND

 

Waste discharges shall not cause the chemical oxygen demand to exceed 30 milligrams per litre.

Inland waters of the Zone

L.   DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES

 

(a)     Waste discharges shall not cause the concentrations of dangerous substances in marine waters to attain such levels as to produce significant toxic effects in humans, fish or any other aquatic organisms, with due regard to biologically cumulative effects in food chains and to toxicant interactions with each other.

Whole zone

(b)    Waste discharges of dangerous substances shall not put a risk to any beneficial uses of the aquatic environment.

Whole zone

 

Source: Cap. 358I, Southern Water Control Zone Statement of Water Quality Objectives.

 


3.2.3        The other relevant guideline is the Practice Note for Professional Persons (ProPECC Note) PN 1/94 – “Construction Site Drainage” which provide guidelines for the handling and disposal of construction discharges. This ProPECC Note is generally applicable for control of site runoff and wastewater generated during the construction phase of the Project.

 

3.2.4        The Technical Memorandum on Standards for Effluents Discharged into Drainage and Sewerage Systems, Inland and Coastal Waters (TM-DSS) under the WPCO defines acceptable discharge limits to different types of receiving water in Hong Kong. Site effluent discharge during the construction phase will be required to comply with the terms and conditions of a discharge licence issued by EPD.

 

3.3              Study Area

 

3.3.1        According to the EIA study brief, the Study Area for the water quality impact assessment should cover the Southern WCZ. The Study Area can be extended to include other areas if they are also found to be impacted and have a bearing on the environmental acceptability of the Project.

 

3.4              Baseline Water Quality Conditions of the Study Area

 

Desktop Review and Field Observations

 

3.4.1        Site visit took place in January 2009. General descriptions and field observations of the water bodies in the Study Area are provided below.

 

Southern WCZ

 

3.4.2        The Southern WCZ stretches from Hong Kong Island south to Lantau Island and faces the South China Sea. The western part of the WCZ is impacted seasonally by the Pearl River flow and the effect diminishes towards the eastern end.

 

Adamasta Channel

 

3.4.3        The Adamasta Channel is a designated navigation fairway which is used by high speed vessels plying to and from Macau, inter-island ferries and fishing vessels. The proposed submarine water main will be laid across the Channel.

 

Cheung Chau (Tai Kwai Wan)

 

3.4.4        Tai Kwai Wan is located immediately to the north of the landfall location at Cheung Chau. Based on site observation, there are no natural stream courses near the Project area at Cheung Chau. Several concrete drainage channels which collect stormwater and village effluent from nearby villages discharge into Tai Kwai Wan via two outfalls. A sandy beach (non-gazetted) and sitting out area can be found at Tai Kwai Wan. The beach is found to be generally clean.

 

3.4.5        The proposed landfall location at Cheung Chau is currently occupied by two contractor works compound for temporary storage of construction materials. The works compound is already formed and covered with concrete. A vegetated area is located between the two works compound.

 

3.4.6        To the south, rocky and sandy shores and artificial seawall can be found with Cheung Kwai Road running along the coastline.

 

3.4.7        Further southwest of the landfall location is the Cheung Chau sewage treatment works with a 200 m long submarine outfall discharging treated effluent into Adamasta Channel.

 

Lantau (Chi Ma Wan Peninsula)

 

3.4.8        The proposed works area at Lantau is located on a rocky shore near Ha So Pai in Chi Ma Wan Peninsula. The works area is within Lantau South Country Park. Without any roads or village development nearby, the area is generally natural and undisturbed. The only man-made feature nearby is the existing land-based water mains and pressure release valve chamber.

 

Bathing Beaches

 

3.4.9        The entire inland waters of Cheung Chau and the southern coast of Chi Ma Wan peninsula is located in a secondary contact recreation subzone. A number of gazetted beaches are found within the Study Area. According to EPD latest data, most of the beaches in South Lantau and Cheung Chau in 2008 were ranked as “Good” water quality (EPD 2009a). The closest gazetted beaches to the Project are the Cheung Chau Tung Wan Beach and Kwun Yam Beach both located at the eastern part of Cheung Chau.


Baseline Conditions

 

Marine Water Quality

 

3.4.10    Water quality in southern WCZ is monitored regularly as part of EPD’s marine water quality monitoring programme. The EPD’s monitoring locations near the Study Area is shown in Figure 3.1.

 

3.4.11    A summary of EPD water quality data in 2008 for the monitoring station closest to the Project at Lantau Island (South) (SM12) is shown in Table 3.2.

 

3.4.12    In 2008, the Southern WCZ attained an overall 65% compliance with the WQOs, lower than that in 2007 (73%). Full compliance (100%) with the WQOs for unionised ammonia (NH3) and E. coli was achieved.  Similar to the Northwestern waters, statiscally significant increasing trends in total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) were observed at this WCZ. Within the secondary contact recreation subzones, full compliance (100%) with the E. coli objective was attained, indicating that these areas were suitable for water sports activities (EPD 2009b).

 

Table 3.2

Summary of EPD Marine Water Quality Data for Southern WCZ (SM12) in 2008

 

Parameters

Unit

Values

Temperature

oC

23
(13.7 – 28.9)

Salinity

 

29.5
(14.9 – 32.9)

Dissolved Oxygen

mg/L

6.8
(4.5 – 9.8)

Dissolved Oxygen (Bottom)

mg/L

6.6
(3.0 – 9.7)

Dissolved Oxygen

% saturation

93
(63 – 121)

Dissolved Oxygen (Bottom)

% saturation

91
(43 – 119)

pH

-

8.1
(7.7 – 8.3)

Secchi Disc Depth

m

1.8
(1.0 – 3.2)

Turbidity

NTU

13.5
(8.8 – 21.9)

Suspended Solids

 

 

mg/L

11.6
(2.8 – 21.0)

5-day Biochemical Oxygen Demand

mg/L

0.7
(0.2 – 1.8)

Ammonia Nitrogen

mg/L

0.07
(0.02 – 0.21)

Unionised Ammonia

mg/L

0.004
(<0.001 – 0.018)

Nitrite Nitrogen

mg/L

0.041
(0.006 – 0.160)

Nitrate Nitrogen

mg/L

0.194
(0.019 – 0.940)

Total Inorganic Nitrogen

mg/L

0.31
(0.07 – 1.31)

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

mg/L

0.27
(0.15 – 0.46)

Total Nitrogen

mg/L

0.51
(0.19 – 1.56)

Orthophosphate Phosphorus

mg/L

0.016
(0.004 – 0.028)

Total Phosphorus

mg/L

0.03
(0.02 – 0.05)

Silica

mg/L

1.3
(0.1 – 4.9)

Chlorophyll-a

mg/L

3.5
(1.2 – 10.4)

E. coli

count/100mL

21
(2 – 200)

Faecal Coliforms

count/100mL

43
(3 – 480)

 

Notes:

1.        Unless otherwise specified, data presented are depth-averaged values calculated by taking the means of three depths: surface, mid-depth, bottom.

2.        Data presented are annual arithmetic means of the depth-averaged results except for E. coli and faecal coliforms which are annual geometric means.

3.        Data in brackets indicate the ranges.

Source: EPD (2009b) Marine Water Quality Monitoring in Hong Kong in 2008

 

3.4.13    An updated baseline water quality should be established before the commencement of the construction phase of the Project to allow appropriate action and limit levels to be determined for impact monitoring and audit.


3.5              Water Sensitive Receivers

 

3.5.1        The Project works area comprises mainly of two sites, the launching site at Cheung Chau and the reception site at Lantau. The proposed launching site at Cheung Chau is located at a headland near Tai Kwai Wan at the north-western part of Cheung Chau. It is currently occupied by two works compound. The proposed reception site at Lantau is located at a rocky shore in the south-eastern coast of Chi Ma Wan peninsula near Ha So Pai.

 

3.5.2        The Water Sensitive Receivers (WSRs) likely to be impacted by the Project include the waters of Southern WCZ, the bathing beaches within the WCZ, the secondary contact recreation subzone, Cheung Chau typhoon shelter and the Cheung Sha Wan fish culture zone. In addition, the Study Area includes areas of ecological or conservation values such as Lantau South Country Park, and the Coastal Protection Area at Cheung Chau. The southern waters are also habitats of corals, marine mammals (notably the Chinese White Dolphins and finless porpoises) as well as fish spawning and nursery grounds. The locations of these WSRs are presented in Figure 3.2.

 

3.6              Potential Impacts During Construction Phase

 

Introduction

 

3.6.1        With the use of Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) in laying the submarine water main, there will be no marine works and the seabed will not be disturbed, hence the potential water quality impact is expected to be greatly reduced. Potential water quality impacts during the drilling works and construction of the land-based water main are discussed below.

 

Site Clearance / Preparation

 

3.6.2        Preparation of the land for construction of the launching site at Cheung Chau will involve removal of surface vegetation and excavations, demolition of temporary structures, removal and import of construction materials. The launching site at Cheung Chau will utilize the existing works compound as such major site formation works can be minimized. Construction of some temporary infrastructure may be necessary such as temporary drainage systems and site offices.

 

3.6.3        The permeability characteristics of the site may change, reducing infiltration into surface layer. This may lead to increased site surface runoff with high suspended solids loadings during the wet season. Erosion of soil enriched in organic matter may also release nutrients into the nearby water bodies.

 

3.6.4        In view of the sensitive natural environment at the reception site in Lantau which is within the Lantau South Country Park, the HDD for this Project will adopt forward reaming and pipe pushing methods thereby minimizing the scale of works in Lantau and the associated environmental impacts. The main staging area and the launching site will be located in Cheung Chau. Site works at the reception site in Lantau is expected to be very limited. An exit pit of approximately 2 m x 3 m will be required. A small temporary working platform of approximately 4 m x 8 m using steel decking or wooden scaffolding will need to be constructed to provide a suitable working area during the final boring process and pipe installation / connection. Such temporary working platform can avoid the need to carry out site formation on the nearby rocky shore. It can also be easily erected and dismantled with very little permanent impact to the environment.

 

Drilling Works

 

3.6.5        It is anticipated that the drilling works will be carried out continuously and could be completed within 12 months.

 

3.6.6        For the laying of the submarine water main, drilling fluid will be required to facilitate the directional drilling during pilot bore, forward reaming and ultimately pipe laying by pushing. Bentonite with or without additives is commonly used as a drilling fluid. Although inadvertent release of bentonite slurry through accidental spillage, site runoff, or migration to the surface (‘frac-out’) can increase sediment loads and therefore have an impact on water quality, it is non-toxic and accidental release can be effectively managed and mitigated.

 

3.6.7        It is estimated that approximately 980 m3 of bentonite will be required. The bentonite will generally be left within the borehole to stabilize the hole when drilling is suspended. Bentonite is reconditioned and recycled throughout the drilling process.

 

3.6.8        The recycling process begins with a mud pump delivering drilling fluid under high pressure from the holding tank to the drill head nozzle. Excavated spoil (drill cuttings) are then transported as a slurry with the drilling fluid to emerge at Cheung Chau into a mud tank for temporary storage. A submersible pump delivers the drilling fluid and slurry with cuttings to the cleaning systems consisting of shaker, desander and desilter. The shaker helps to separate large drill cuttings for removal. Lighter density liquid is then brought to the desander and desilter where finer solids are discarded. The drilling fluid is then discharged back to the holding tank ready for conditioning and reuse. Wastewater generated during the recycling process, from the cleaning systems along with wastewater from wheel washing facility and site runoff will be treated (e.g. sedimentation) and will be reuse for washing within the site or re-circulated back to the bore hole. No discharge of wastewater during the drilling fluid treatment and recycling process is expected.

 

3.6.9        Solids which are filtered out from the slurry are divided into coarse and fine particles. Coarse particles (crushed rocks) that are settled out in the shaker are transfer to the washing tank for cleaning and draining then for storage and reuse before disposal to the designated public fill reception facilities. Similarly, finer particles will be stored in containers for reuse on-site before off site disposal of excess materials.

 

3.6.10    Based on preliminary estimation, size of the folding tank is about 2m x 5m x 5m with volume of about 50,000 litres (~50 m3). Mud tank of size 6m x 5m x 3m with capacity of about 90,000 litres (~ 90 m3) and 150 m3/hr circulation (2,500 litres/min) will need to be provided. Standby tank of similar capacity should also be provided. Notwithstanding, the Contractor will be required to submit a Drilling Fluid Management Plan for Engineer to approve prior to commencement of construction.

 

3.6.11    The works area at Cheung Chau will be paved with a slight fall towards land to prevent site runoff from directly flowing to the sea. The 500 mm high concrete bund around the site will provide about 100 m3 in volume storage for the site runoff and/or in the event of spillage / leakage of drilling fluid. This is adequate for spillage / leakage of drilling fluid from either the holding tank or the mud tank.

 

3.6.12    The pilot hole and reaming will terminate approximately 50 m short of the final exit point at Chi Ma Wan. Prior to drilling the final 50 m, the reamed hole will be thoroughly cleaned with water to remove all cuttings and drilling fluid. The final 50 m of drilling will be completed using water instead of bentonite in order to prevent the release of bentonite at the exit pit. Approximately 0.3 m high concrete bund will be constructed around the exit pit to contain the drilling fluid, which is mainly silty water and generated when the drill head bores through the rock at Lantau during the final drilling process. The exact level of the concrete bund will be determined on site to ensure that it will not be lower than the ground level of the launching site at Cheung Chau.

 

3.6.13    Approximately 1,780 m3 of water will be required for flushing the entire drill hole after the final drill before installing the casing and water pipe. The water (likely to have high silt content) will undergoes sedimentation and treatment at the Cheung Chau launching site before being re-circulated back to the hole for flushing. Adequate number of tanks with sufficient capacity will be required to handle and treat the water. The estimated capacity of the proposed sedimentation tank to treat the flushing water is about 20 m3 (assuming flush rate is 3 m3/min, with a retention time of 6 minutes).

 

3.6.14    If not controlled properly, silty runoff from site areas around the drilling rig, entry pit, stockpiling area and the associated drilling fluid delivery, recovery and containment systems may contaminate the nearby water bodies but this can be controlled by proper site containment and effective site operations management.

           

Concreting Work

 

3.6.15    Concreting work will be required for reinstatement of the road surface after laying of the land-based water main along Cheung Kwai Road in Cheung Chau and the entry and exit pits at the landfall. If concrete spillage, washdown or concrete curing water is inadvertently introduced into the water course, the pH level will be raised and may result in contamination of the water. Turbidity and suspended solids levels will also increase if contaminated by runoff containing waste concrete.

 

3.6.16    However, the amount of concrete to be used is expected to be minimal and can be controlled through good site management practices.

 

            Site Workshop or Depot

 

3.6.17    Works areas and site offices will be provided for site staff and contractors at the proposed launching site in Cheung Chau only. It may include workshop or depot to provide maintenance and repair services for the equipment on site. The workshop may store engine oil, lubricants, chemicals and waste oil/materials which may create impacts if accidental spillage occurs. Waste oil may infiltrate the surface topsoil and contaminate the ground. Stormwater runoff from the site may wash the oil spillage into adjacent water bodies. No workshop or depot will be located at the proposed reception site in Lantau.

 

General Construction Works

 

3.6.18    General construction works will be continuous throughout both wet and dry seasons. During the wet season, silty runoff will be generated from the works area. Spillage, hydraulic leakage and runoff from the surface of standby construction equipment during rainy conditions may release oil and lubricants to the surrounding environment. If the site runoff is not adequately managed, it may enter the water bodies and increase the suspended solids, turbidity and oil & grease levels of these water bodies.


Presence of Additional Population (Workers)

 

3.6.19     The presence of site staff and construction workers will generate sewage and domestic refuse. Impacts include waste and wastewater generated from eating areas, toilets and waste disposal areas. Sewage arising from on-site construction workforce would have the potential to cause water pollution if it is discharged directly into adjacent water bodies without any appropriate treatment.

 

Sterilization of Water Main Prior to Commissioning

 

3.6.20     All new fresh water mains must be cleaned and sterilized before being put into operation. Typically, water mains are sterilized by chlorination. The purpose of chlorination is to disinfect the water main, resulting in an absence of coliforms as confirmed by laboratory analysis, before they are placed in service. Chlorine solutions are normally used as the sterilizing agent.

 

3.6.21    The cleaning and sterilization procedures of fresh water mains according to the General Specification for Civil Engineering Works Volume 2, 2006 Edition (Section 22.73) and WSD Departmental Instruction No. 805: Mainlaying - Cleaning and Sterilization of Fresh Water Mains are listed below. Notwithstanding the procedures below, the Contractor should also adhere to the Project contract document with regards to sterilization of the water main.

 

1.                  All extraneous materials should be removed before the fresh water pipeline is laid and connected.

 

2.                  The pipeline should be filled slowly with water and tested to the required pressure.

 

3.                  After the pipeline has been successfully pressure tested, it should be cleaned internally and flushed through with potable water. For long length of small diameter mains which are inaccessible for cleaning (size below DN600), swabbing should be carried out to remove dirt and materials inadvertently left in the pipeline.

 

4.                  The pipeline should then be completed filled with water that has been dosed with a homogeneous solution of sterilising chemicals (e.g. chloride of lime) such that the final concentration of free chlorine in the water is at least 30 ppm. The water should be left in the pipeline for at least 24 hours.

 

5.                  After the 24-hour period, the pipeline should be drained down and the sterilizing water should be flushed out using potable water until the remaining chlorine level in the pipeline is less than 1 ppm. Bacteriological and chemical samples should be taken and submitted to the Waterworks Chemist for analysis in accordance with the contract requirements.

 

6.                  To minimize or avoid any possibility of contamination, sterilization of the pipeline should take place not more than 7 days before putting it into operation.

 

3.6.22    Approximately 590 m3 of water will be required to clean and flush the completed water main. Any solids flushed out will be settled out through the sedimentation tank. Approximately 295 m3 of chlorinated water will be used to sterilize the water main.

 

3.6.23    If high chlorinated water reaches an aquatic system, it has the potential to kill fish and other aquatic organism because of the chlorine concentration. One mode of action is likely through damaging the gills, thus preventing the fish from breathing. Therefore, it is necessary to dechlorinate the water in order to make it safe for discharge to the environment.

 

3.6.24    Currently, sodium bisulfite, sodium sulfite and sodium thiosulfate are most frequently used for dechlorination. Sodium thiosulfate is preferred since it is less hazardous and consumes less oxygen than sodium bisulfite and sodium sulfite. The Contractor is required to submit for the Engineer approval, details of the processes and chemicals including dosage to be used in the chlorination and dechlorination of the sterilizing water.

 

3.6.25    The sterilization water must be treated to the relevant discharge requirement stipulated in TM-DSS before discharging. With the implementation of appropriate treatment such as dechlorination to control water discharge from sterilization of water main, adverse impact on water quality is not expected. Monitoring of the total residual chlorine concentration at the discharge point is recommended.

 

3.6.26    As the site at Cheung Chau is designated for secondary recreational contact, the sterilization of the main should be scheduled during the dry season.

 


3.7              Mitigation Measures for Construction Phase Impacts

 

3.7.1        The main potential impacts from the construction phase of the Project include an increase in suspended solids, pH value, oil & grease, general site effluent and chlorinated water entering adjacent water bodies. The following sections discuss the proposed mitigation measures for the potential water quality impacts identified above.

 

            General

 

3.7.2        The Contractor shall observe and comply with the Water Pollution Control Ordinance (WPCO) and its subsidiary regulations. The Contractor shall carry out the works in such a manner as to minimise adverse impacts on the water quality during execution of the works. In particular the Contractor shall arrange his method of working to minimise the effects on the water quality within and outside the site and on the transport routes.

 

3.7.3        The Contractor shall follow the practices, and be responsible for the design, construction, operation and maintenance of all the mitigation measures below and as specified in ProPECC PN 1/94 – “Construction Site Drainage”. The design of the mitigation measures shall be submitted by the Contractor to the Engineer for approval. All discharge from the construction works should meet the discharge standards stipulated under the WPCO “Technical Memorandum on Standards for Effluents Discharged into Drainage and Sewerage Systems, Inland and Coastal Waters”.

 

            Site Clearance / Preparation

 

3.7.4        Proper construction site drainage management measures should be implemented to control site runoff and drainage, and thereby prevent high sediment loadings from reaching nearby water bodies. Site runoff and wastewater should not be discharged into nearby water bodies without proper treatment.

 

3.7.5        Turbid water from construction sites must be treated to minimise the solids content before being discharged. Advice on the handling and disposal of site discharge is given in the ProPECC Note PN 1/94 – “Construction Site Drainage”.

 

3.7.6        In general, surface runoff from construction sites should be discharged into water bodies via adequately designed silt removal facilities such as sand traps, silt traps and sedimentation tanks. Channels or earth bunds or sand bag barriers should be provided on site to properly direct stormwater to such silt removal facilities. Sufficient numbers of pumps and tanks of adequate capacity should be provided on-site. Perimeter channels at site boundaries should be provided to intercept storm run-off from outside the site so that it will not wash across the site. Catchpits and perimeter channels should be constructed in advance of earthworks.

 

3.7.7        Silt removal facilities and diversion channels should be maintained and the deposited silt and grit should be removed regularly, especially at the onset of and after each rainstorm to ensure proper functioning of these facilities at all times.

 

3.7.8        Measures should be taken to prevent the washing away of construction materials, soil, silt or debris into the nearby water bodies. Open stockpiles susceptible to erosion should be covered with tarpaulin or similar fabric and provided with containment such as bunds, sand bag barriers or equivalent measures, especially during the wet season (April – September) or when heavy rainstorm is predicted. Runoff to watercourses should be intercepted by minimising flat exposed areas of permeable soil, and by forming pits or diversion channels into which runoff can flow to suitable treatment facilities before discharge.

 

Drilling Works

 

Launching Site at Cheung Chau

 

3.7.9        The proposed launching site at Cheung Chau should be paved with a slight fall towards land to prevent site runoff from directly flowing to the sea. The launching site should be provided with an adequately designed site drainage system to contain and treat polluted site runoff and wastewater. Adequate numbers of tank with sufficient capacity should be provided on-site to collect, store and treat drilling fluids, cuttings and/or chemicals. These tanks should be surrounded by bunds and regularly inspected and maintained to avoid leakage.

 

3.7.10    During directional drilling, excavated spoil (cuttings) will be carried as a slurry with the drilling fluid to emerge at Cheung Chau. The slurry should be treated to remove the cuttings and recycled as drilling fluid. Cuttings should be stored in containers prior to removal and disposal as construction & demolition material to public fill reception facilities.

 

3.7.11    If temporary storage of cuttings is required for later reuse, this should be undertaken in Cheung Chau. Care should be taken in the storage of cuttings especially during the wet season and the storage area should be covered and bunded to prevent silty runoff entering water bodies.

 


3.7.12    A schematic layout plan of the proposed launching site and drainage measures at Cheung Chau is shown in Figure 3.3 to demonstrate the launching site has adequate land area to setup the necessary construction equipment, auxiliary equipment, site offices and drilling fluid containment, recovery and treatment systems. In general, the site will be divided into clean area and dirty area. The clean area will be used to house the site offices, storage area and other non-polluting uses. The dirty area will be the main drilling works site consisting of the drilling rig, entry pit, mud tank, drilling pipes storage, drilling fluid recycling and treatment systems, stockpiling area and wastewater treatment systems.

 

3.7.13    The entire dirty area should be surrounded by a 0.5 m tall concrete bund to fully contain and prevent site runoff from discharging into the marine waters untreated as well as to prevent surface runoff from entering the site. The entry pit should be further surrounded by a 0.3 m tall concrete bund for added protection to contain and avoid spillage of drilling fluid. All site runoff should be diverted to an adequately designed wastewater treatment system for treatment before discharge.

 

3.7.14    The perimeter of the clean area should be surrounded with 300 mm u-channel to collect and divert all site runoff for treatment before discharge. Bund should be provided to prevent surrounding surface runoff from entering the site.

 

3.7.15    After separating the cuttings, bentonite slurry should be re-circulated for reuse in the drilling works.  By adopting a forward reaming approach all slurry treatment and drilling fluid recycling systems should be located and managed on Cheung Chau.

 

Reception Site at Lantau

 

3.7.16    The pilot hole and reaming should be stopped approximately 50 m short of the final exit point at Chi Ma Wan in order to prevent any release of slurry in to the marine environment. Prior to drilling the final 50 m, the reamed hole should be thoroughly cleaned with water to remove all cuttings and drilling fluid. The final 50 m of drilling should be completed using water instead of bentonite in order to prevent the release of bentonite at the exit pit. Approximately 0.3 m high concrete bund should be constructed around the exit pit to contain the drilling fluid, which is mainly silty water and generated when the drill head bores through the rock at Lantau during the final drilling process. The exact level of the concrete bund should be determined on site to ensure that it will not be lower than the ground level of the launching site at Cheung Chau.


3.7.17    The use of containment structure such as earth bund, sand bag barriers wrapped with geotextile fabric or similar material, diversion channels or other similar techniques should be installed surrounding the site boundary at Lantau during the wet season to intercept storm runoff from outside the site so that it will not wash across the site (or into the exit pit).

 

3.7.18    To provide further protection, silt curtain should be installed before commencement of works at Lantau to minimize the water quality impact. The design and installation should be certified by the Environmental Team (ET), verified by the Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) and approved by the Engineer to ensure the intended protection can be achieved. The Contractor should regularly inspect and maintain the silt curtain to ensure its effectiveness.

 

3.7.19    A schematic layout plan of the proposed reception site and drainage measures at Lantau is shown in Figure 3.4.

 

Management Plans and Monitoring

 

3.7.20    The Contractor should submit a Drainage Management Plan detailing the temporary drainage measures along with the proposed measures to ameliorate the potential water quality impacts to the Environmental Team (ET) for certification, the Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) for verification and to the Engineer for approval before commencement of the construction works.

 

3.7.21    The Contractor should also submit a Drilling Fluid Management Plan outlining expected volume of water, the type of soil and an estimated quantity of bentonite, full details of plans for monitoring drilling fluid flow (out and return) and pressure, wastewater discharge, slurry containment, treatment, recycling and transport, and the approved disposal site.  The plan should also contain details of contingency plans for dealing with frac-out or other inadvertent release of slurry. Contingency plans should include the provision of standby pumps, containment booms, vacuum unit and tanks on site to contain and remove turbid, muddy water should incidental frac-outs occur.

 

3.7.22    Regular monitoring of suspended solids and turbidity should be conducted during construction works. Any exceedance of water quality in the nearby water bodies caused by site runoff should be rectified in accordance with EM&A programme for this Project.

 

            Concreting Work

 

3.7.23    Runoff should be carefully channelled and treated to prevent concrete-contaminated water from entering water bodies. Adjustment of pH can be achieved by adding a suitable neutralising reagent to wastewater prior to discharge.

 

3.7.24    Any exceedance of the acceptable range of pH levels in nearby water bodies caused by site runoff containing concrete should be monitored and rectified under the EM&A programme for this Project.

 

            Site Workshop or Depot

            General Construction Works

 

3.7.25    Site workshop or depot including storage of chemicals and chemical waste should be located at the proposed launching site in Cheung Chau only. No workshop or depot should be located at the proposed reception site in Lantau.

 

3.7.26    Any Contractor generating waste oil or other chemicals as a result of his activities should register as a chemical waste producer and provide a safe designated storage area for chemicals on site. The storage site should be located away from existing water bodies.

 

3.7.27    All compounds in works areas should be located on areas of hard standing surface with provision of diversion channels and settlement ponds where necessary to allow interception and controlled release of settled / treated water. Hard standing compounds should drain via an oil interceptor. The oil interceptor should be regularly inspected and cleaned to avoid wash-out of oil during storm conditions. A bypass should be provided to avoid overload of the interceptor's capacity. To prevent spillage of fuels or other chemicals to water bodies, all fuel tanks and storage areas should be sited on sealed areas within a bund of a capacity equal to 110% of the storage capacity of the largest tank. Where temporary storage of chemicals or fuel drums outside the storage area is necessary, drip tray should be provided. Disposal of the waste oil should be carried out by a licensed collector. Good housekeeping practices should be implemented to minimise careless spillage and to keep the storage and the work space in a tidy and clean condition. Appropriate training including safety codes and relevant manuals should be given to the personnel who regularly handle the chemicals on site.

 

Emergency Contingency Plan

 

3.7.28    The Contractor should prepare an Emergency Contingency Plan (spill response plan) for the Project to contain and remove accidental spillage of drilling fluids, chemicals and all hazardous materials on-site including fuels at short notice and to prevent or to minimize the quantities of contaminants from entering the nearby water bodies and affecting the sensitive habitats. The Contractor should submit the Emergency Contingency Plan to the ET for review & comment and to the Engineer for approval. The Plan should include, but not limited to, the following:

 

(i)                  potential emergency situations

(ii)                chemicals or hazardous materials used on-site (and their location)

(iii)               emergency response team

(iv)              emergency action plans and procedures

(v)                list of emergency telephone hotlines

(vi)              locations and types of emergency response equipment

(vii)             training plan and emergency drill

(viii)           schedules for review and audit.

 

General Guidance for Handling of Spillage / Leakage

 

3.7.29    In the event that accidental spillage or leakage of hazardous substances / chemical wastes takes place, the response procedures as listed below should be followed. It should be noted that the procedures below are not exhaustive. The Contractor should propose other response procedures in the emergency contingency plan based on actual site conditions as well as the particular types and quantities of chemicals or hazardous substances used, handled and stored on-site.

 

·                     Contact person in charge or nominated person immediately and initiate action plans based on the emergency contingency plan.

 

·                     Oil leakage or spillage should be contained and cleaned up immediately. Waste oil should be collected and stored for recycling or disposal in accordance with the Waste Disposal Ordinance.

 

·                     Instruct untrained personnel to keep at a safe distance well away from the spillage area.

 

·                     If the spillage / leakage is severe or is causing hazard to life, initiate emergency evacuation and call the emergency services.

 

·                     Only trained persons equipped with suitable protective clothing and equipment should be allowed to enter and clean up the waste spillage / leakage area.

 

·                     Where the spillage / leakage is contained in the enclosed storage area, the waste can be transferred back into suitable containers by suitable handheld equipment, such as hand operated pumps, scoops or shovels. If the spillage / leakage quantity is small, it can be covered and mixed with suitable absorbing materials such as absorbent tissue paper, pads, dry soft sand or vermiculite. The resultant slurry should be treated as chemical waste and transferred to suitable containers for disposal.

 

·                     For spillage / leakage into nearby water bodies, immediate action is required to contain the spillage / leakage. Appropriate structural, physical barrier or secondary containment (e.g. containment booms) should be deployed to contain the spill and if possible to prevent contaminated water from dispersing away from the source. Suitable liquid absorbing materials such as absorbent tissue paper, pads or rolls should be used to recover the spilt substances. The resultant slurry should be treated as chemical waste and transferred to suitable containers for disposal.

 

·                     For spillage / leakage in other areas, immediate action is required to contain the spillage / leakage. Suitable liquid absorbing materials such as absorbent tissue paper, pads, dry soft sand or vermiculite should be used to cover the spill. The resultant slurry should be treated as chemical waste and transferred to suitable containers for disposal.

 

·                     Areas that have been contaminated by chemical waste spillage / leakage should be cleaned. While water is a soluble solvent for aqueous chemical wastes and water soluble organic waste, kerosene or turpentine should be used for organic chemical wastes that are not soluble in water. The waste from the cleanup operation should be treated and disposed of as chemical waste.

 

·                     In incidents where the spillage / leakage may result in significant contamination of an area or risk of pollution, the Environmental Protection Department and other relevant departments should be informed immediately.

           
Presence of Additional Population (Workers)

 

3.7.30    Sewage arising from construction workers on site should be collected in a suitable storage facility, such as portable chemical toilets. An adequate number of portable toilets should be provided for the construction workforce. The portable toilets should be maintained in a state that will not deter the workers from using them. Wastewater collected should be discharged into foul sewers and collected by licensed collectors.

 

3.7.31    The collected wastewater from sewage facilities and also from eating areas or washing facilities of site offices should be disposed to foul sewer. If there is no foul sewer in the vicinity, a septic tank and soakaway system or for larger flow, a sewage treatment plant should be provided. All domestic sewage discharges (except into foul sewer) are controlled under the WPCO. The Contractor must apply for a discharge licence from EPD and must comply with the terms and conditions of a valid WPCO licence.

 

Sterilization of Water Main Prior to Commissioning

 

3.7.32    Effluent from the sterilization of water main should be treated including dechlorination by physical process e.g. adsorption by activated carbon filter, or chemical process e.g. neutralisation by dechlorination agent dosing to ensure compliance with the discharge requirements stipulated in the TM-DSS. Adequate tanks with sufficient capacity should be provided to allow proper treatment of the effluent prior to discharge.

 

3.7.33    The sterilization of the water main and the dechlorination process should be conducted at the launching site at Cheung Chau. As the site at Cheung Chau is designated for secondary recreational contact, the sterilization of the main should be scheduled during the dry season. The Contractor should submit for the Engineer approval, details of the dechlorination process and any chemicals including dosage to be used.

 

3.7.34    The Contractor should provide a dechlorination plant of sufficient capacity to contain and treat the sterilising water with high chlorine concentration before discharge. Details of the specification of the dechlorination plant should be submitted to the Engineer for approval. They should include but not limited to the following:

 

·                     the nominal flow rate shall not be less than 36 cubic meter per hour;

·                     the plant shall be capable of dechlorinating water with chlorine level up to 40 mg/litre;

·                     the maximum chlorine level of dechlorinated water shall be <0.2 mg/litre;

·                     the recommended contact time if dechlorination by adsorption with activated carbon filter is proposed;

·                     a water meter or other measuring device shall be installed at the inlet pipe of the dechlorination plant to measure the amount of water treated, in cubic metres; and

·                     sensors and data loggers for continuous measurement and record of chlorine level shall be installed at the inlet and outlet pipe of the dechlorination plant.

 

3.7.35    In-situ testing of total residual chlorine should be conducted every hour at the discharge point to ensure the chlorine concentration does not exceed the stipulated maximum level when dechlorinated water is being discharged.

 

3.7.36    If the dechlorinated water exceed the allowed concentration, discharge must be suspended and the water should be circulated to a standby tank for further dechlorination and testing. The location of the sampling point will depends on the discharge point to be proposed by the Contractor. The Contractor should submit details of the proposed sampling location, frequency and equipment for verification by the ET Leader and approval by the Engineer before commencement of the sterilization work of the completed water main. The proposed sampling location(s) should be submitted to EPD for reference.

 

3.8              Residual and Cumulative Impacts

 

3.8.1        With the effective implementation of mitigation measures as described above, residual impacts on water quality of the receiving water bodies due to the implementation of this Project are expected to be negligible.

 

3.8.2        The DSD project “Agreement No. CE 31/2007(DS) – Upgrading of Cheung Chau and Tai O Sewage Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities (PWP Item 354DS)” will likely coincide with the land-based water main laying at Cheung Chau. As the sewer laying works is relatively small scale and the interfacing works area is very small, cumulative water quality is not anticipated as long as the recommended mitigation measures are properly implemented by the Contractor.

 

3.9              Monitoring and Audit Requirement

 

3.9.1        Potential water quality impacts during the construction phase can be mitigated by the implementation of the recommended site practices and other measures to control runoff and to minimise water pollution.

 

3.9.2        A water quality monitoring and audit programme is recommended to check for compliance with relevant water quality standards, to ensure the proper implementation of the mitigation measures and to verify the effectiveness of the recommended mitigation measures.

 

3.9.3        Monitoring of pH, dissolved oxygen, suspended solids and turbidity will need to be carried out during the construction stage to ensure that any deterioration in water quality can be readily detected and prompt action taken to rectify the situation. In addition, residual chlorine will need to be monitored during sterilization of the completed water main. Impact and control monitoring stations should be provided.

 

3.9.4        No monitoring is required during the operational phase.

 

3.10          Summary

 

3.10.1    With the use of HDD technique in laying the submarine water main, there will be no marine works and no impact to the seabed. The preferred construction option of using HDD will significantly reduce potential water quality impacts to the sensitive receivers within the marine waters of the Southern WCZ.

 

3.10.2    The construction works could impact the water bodies through silt-laden site runoff, inadvertent release of drilling fluids, runoff from workshops & depot, sewage effluent from the construction workforce and discharge of chlorinated water during sterilization of the water main. These impacts can be readily mitigated by provision of suitable temporary site drainage systems with treatment facilities, installation of drilling fluid recycling and treatment systems, implementation of the recommended good site management practices, and proper sewage collection and disposal systems.

 

3.10.3    With the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, no adverse residual water quality impact is expected during construction phase of the Project.

 

3.11          References

 

EPD (2009a) Beach Water Quality in Hong Kong 2008.

EPD (2009b) Marine Water Quality Monitoring in Hong Kong in 2008.

 

 Home  |    Print