16 Summary
of Environmental Outcomes
16.2 Population
and Environmental Sensitive Areas Protected
16.3 Key
Assessment Assumptions and Limitation of Assessment Methodologies
16.5 Environmentally
Friendly Design and Benefit
16.6 Summary
of Measures Adopted to Avoid and Minimize Environmental Impacts
17 Environmental
Monitoring & Audit
17.4 Project
Implementation Schedule
18.6 Sewerage
and Sewage Treatment Implications
18.7 Waste
Management Implications
18.8 Land
Contamination Impact
18.10 Impacts
on Sites of Cultural Heritage
18.11 Landscape
and Visual Impacts
18.16 Environmental
Monitoring and Audit
This chapter summarises the overall environmental outcome due to the development
of LMC Loop in accordance with Section 3.4.19 of the EIA Study Brief. With the
vision to develop the LMC Loop as a hub for cross boundary human resources
development within a sustainable Knowledge and Technology Exchange Zone, the
Revised PLP and supporting infrastructure have been prepared to achieve
economic, social and environmental sustainability. In terms of environmental
quality, the Revised PLP would provide an Ecological Area and extensive open
space as well as activity/amenity corridor. With the implementation of the
proposed environmental measures, adverse environmental impacts arising from the
Project are not anticipated.
16.2 Population and Environmental Sensitive Areas Protected
16.2.1 Affected Population (Existing and Planned) along the Project
According to the development parameters, the estimated total number
of workers and students for the LMC Loop is approximately 53,000, based on a
Gross Floor Area (GFA) and overall plot ratio of 1,200,000m2 and
1.37 which includes higher education, high-tech R&D facilities, cultural
and creative industries and supporting commercial usage at full operation.
Higher education would occupy 60% of the total GFA, while the remaining GFA is
distributed amongst other land uses including hi-tech R&D facilities, cultural
and creative industries, supporting commercial, possible boundary crossing
facilities, other government uses and ancillary offices. The provision of open
space, amenity area, and an ecological area has been considered in the Revised
PLP.
In order to serve the development
in LMC Loop, external transport infrastructure to MTR LMC Station, existing San
Tin Highway, and future Kwu Tung North NDA were proposed. The alignment will
affect to various extents the existing residents in Chau Tau Tsuen, Ha Wan Fisherman
San Tsuen, Ha Wan Tsuen, Ma Tso Lung and Pun Uk Tsuen.
To minimize the potential
environmental nuisance during construction phase, phasing of construction
programme is proposed in order to minimize the nuisance to nearby villages.
Good site practices for air quality, noise and water quality were fully
considered. In operational phase, central air
conditioning system for the first layer of noise sensitive receivers facing internal Road M1 and noise barriers alongside the ECR and WCR were proposed so as to
minimise the nuisance. In addition, all buildings with central air conditioning
in the development will be equipped with an odour removal system capable of 95%
removal efficiency.
16.2.2 Wetlands in Deep Bay
The major environmental sensitive areas near the Project include the wetlands in Deep Bay such as reed marsh inside LMC Loop, Hoo Hok Wai, the Meander, Wetland Conservation and Buffer Areas, LMC Spur Line Mitigation Area, riparian corridor at Ma Tso Lung, Ho Sheung Heung egretry, Mai Po and Futian National Nature Reserve.
16.3 Key Assessment Assumptions and Limitation of Assessment Methodologies
In accordance with Clause 3.4.17 of the EIA Study Brief, the key
assessment assumptions and limitation of assessment methodologies are presented
in Appendix 16-1.
In accordance with Clause 3.4.18 of the EIA Study Brief, the impact summary showing the assessment points, results of impact predictions, relevant standards or criteria, extents of exceedances predicted, impact avoidance measures considered, mitigation measures proposed and residual impacts (after mitigation) forms an essential part of the Executive Summary and is presented in Appendix 16-2.
16.5 Environmentally Friendly Design and Benefit
16.5.1 Optimum Design for External Connections
16.5.1.1 Western Connection Road
The design of WCR involved the possible utilisation of the existing LMC Road and Ha
Wan Tsuen Road, which will have relatively low impact on environment, and comprises few
construction issues. Furthermore, as this scheme does not directly pass through
the existing villages, land encroachment issue is not expected to be
significant.
16.5.1.2 Eastern Connection Road
The design of ECR is intended to minimise the ecological disruptions by designing a section of the carriageway at below-ground level, while eliminating the drawbacks/constraints generated by deep tunnel configurations.
Apart from the
depressed road/shallow underpass across the Meander and elevated road section across existing streams, the entire route will be at-grade road and it could
prevent disturbance to flight paths of birds. Adequate mammal crossing will be
provided along Horn Hill.
The road will pass through the fish ponds as a depressed road and crosses the Meander as a shallow underpass configuration. The underpass section is 200m in length and it avoids the need of a full tunnel design and could also maintain a 2-way single carriageway configuration, which avoids overdesign. Furthermore, as the road level of the underpass level is only -9mPD, the need for a long approach ramp will be eliminated, thus allowing a better interface with the internal road network and public transport services. The depressed road will mean some ecological disturbance during the operational phase, which could be greatly reduced by the use of low level shrubs and trees on both sides to serve as visual barrier to the depressed road. Furthermore, animal overpass above the depressed road would be provided to maintain connectivity for terrestrial mammals.
16.5.1.3 Direct Link to LMC Station
The alignment of the Direct
Link have been designed to follow the existing railway reserve of the LMC Spur
Line as far as possible to minimise adding ecological impact to the existing
fish ponds and to stay away from the existing New Boundary Patrol Road to
reduce the security impact.
In the sections
crossing the reedbeds within LMC Station, the piers of viaducts will be located
at bunds in order to avoid permanent reedbed loss.
From environmental
point of view, the Direct Link will connect to the proposed WCR. There will be
no additional structures above the Meander and hence reduce the environmental
nuisances.
16.5.2
Ecological Area
In LMC Loop, an Ecological Area that includes a
large area of reprovisioned reed marsh will be created prior to the
commencement of major construction. The provision of a purpose-built area of compensatory reed marsh
habitat facilitates more effective ecological enhancement through targeted
design and avoidance of the fragmentation and disturbance impacts that might
result if it was partially surrounded by development. A buffer distance of 50m between it and the developed area is also
recommended. The interface of the buffer and reedbed, as well as the buffer
itself, will largely comprise tree species of ecological benefit that will act
as a visual buffer against human activity in this zone. The buffer zone
provides an excellent opportunity to increase the wildlife value of LMC Loop
post-development, via the provision of native tree species and/or established
exotics with existing wildlife value. Albeit not considered essential from an
ecological point of view, such provision will also compensate for the loss of
existing trees in LMC Loop.
16.5.3 Provisions for Re-use of Treated Sewage Effluent
In order to formulate a
comprehensive plan for developing a sustainable, environmentally friendly,
energy efficient and people oriented community in the LMC Loop, technical
guidelines on the green initiatives for the development of the LMC Loop have
been proposed.
One of the major green initiatives
proposals will be the re-use of Treated Sewage Effluent (TSE) from the on-site STW. The TSE could be used
for non-potable water uses such as flushing, make-up water for District Cooling
System (DCS) and irrigation in the LMC Loop. It could enhance the efficiency of
energy infrastructure of the LMC Loop. Such system would reduce potable water
consumption, encourage cost-effective use of TSE and minimise pollution loads
to the Deep Bay.
16.5.4 Odour Control Devices for On-site STW
Odour control devices will be installed to reduce
the odour emissions from the proposed STW for the LMC Loop. The required odour
removal efficiency should be at least 95%. To tackle the cumulative odour impact due to Shenzhen
River, the project proponent will undertake to implement bioremediation of
98% odour removal efficiency along a section of Shenzhen River. As a residual
mitigation measure, all buildings with central air conditioning in the
development will be equipped with an odour removal system capable of 95%
removal efficiency. With the odour removal system in place, the odour criterion
will be met inside all internal spaces.
16.5.5 Centralized Air Ventilation
In order to tackle the traffic
noise impact within the LMC Loop during operational phase, the first layer of noise sensitive receivers building facing Road M1 (i.e. Education and OU R&D/C&C zones)
will provide air conditioning with ventilation system.
16.5.6 Building Height Profiles and Amenity/Activity Corridor
An optimum GFA is 1.2Mm2
and the plot ratio will then be 1.37. The low-rise building will be placed at
the south and east of LMC Loop to minimize the impact to flight lines and EA. Tallest building will be located at west and centre of LMC Loop, which is of less ecological sensitivity. The tallest buildings will be
approximately 12 storeys (about 54 mPD).
The location of amenity/activity
corridor is designed in light of the proposal in Shenzhen. A continued wind
corridor from Shenzhen to Hong Kong is also provided.
16.5.7 Green Initiatives
To promote low carbon and green
community, a number of green initiatives such as the environmentally friendly
transport system, district cooling system and on-site sewage treatment works
with effluent recycling for flushing, irrigation and make-up
water for DCS were formulated as recommended
technical guidelines for future developers’ considerations. The implementation
of these green initiatives will be subject to separate EIA studies (if
identified as DPs) and engineering findings during detailed design stage.
Green initiatives for different
themes including urban design and planning, green infrastructure, transport and
logistics, energy, water, waste and materials that are applicable at both
district and building levels are listed in the Table 16.1 below.
Table 16.1 Green initiatives at district and building
levels
Themes |
Green Initiatives |
|
District Level |
||
Urban Design and
Planning |
Avoiding urban
heat island effect. |
|
Creating a
successful public space network. |
||
Improving street
design and layout. |
||
Providing comfortable
internal conditions. |
||
Green
Infrastructure |
Integrating
green space into urban areas. |
|
Protecting
established wildlife habitats and using green spaces as wildlife habitats. |
||
Transport and
Logistics |
Making a low-emission
and car-free zone. |
|
Encouraging low
carbon vehicle technologies and fuels. |
||
Promotion of
walking and cycling. |
||
Energy |
Adopting
district cooling system (Fresh Water Cooling Tower System using treated sewage
effluent as Heat rejection) subject to further study. |
|
Selecting low
carbon and renewable technologies. |
||
Improving
building energy efficiency. |
||
Creating
opportunities for new patterns of ownership of energy delivery system. |
||
Water |
Adopting water
recycle strategies - Treated Sewage Effluent (TSE). |
|
Designing for
sustainable water use. |
||
Integrating
sustainable drainage systems into planning and design. |
||
Waste |
Formulating
waste reduction strategies. |
|
Devising waste
collection strategies. |
||
Integrating
waste infrastructure. |
||
Exploring
community waste management. |
||
Materials |
Selecting
materials with lowest environmental impacts. |
|
Selecting
materials from local/regional sources. |
||
Selecting
materials from sustainable sources. |
||
Selecting
materials with high recycled content. |
||
Building Level |
||
Renewable Energy |
Solar hot water. |
|
Photovoltaics
(PV). |
||
Building Energy
Efficiency |
Passive Design |
Proper building orientation.
|
Daylighting. |
||
High performance
facade. Vertical
Shading. High thermal
insulation performance glass. Use of automated
blinds. |
||
Optimal window
to wall ratio. |
||
Thermal mass. |
||
Improved
air-tightness. |
||
Active Design |
Energy Efficient
Lighting System. High efficiency
lighting fixtures. Lighting
control. |
|
Energy efficient
ventilation system. Hybrid
ventilation. Demand control
ventilation. |
||
Energy efficient
air-conditioning system. Heat recovery. Free cooling. Equipment with
Variable Speed Drives (VSDs). |
||
High efficiency
lifts and escalators. Variable voltage
variable frequency (VVVF) drives. Group selective
collective control. |
||
Behavioural
Change |
Higher indoor
set-point temperature. |
|
High efficiency
electrical appliances. |
||
Water Efficient
Fixtures |
Low volume/ dual
flush water closets. |
|
Low flow urinal
with sensor control. |
||
Automatic
control of taps and toilet flushing faucets with infrared sensors. |
||
Water Efficient Irrigation
System. |
||
Waste Reduction (Operational
Phase) |
Recycling Bins
System (for paper, metals, plastics, fluorescent lamps, glass, toner
cartridges, rechargeable battery, scrap electrical and electronic appliances,
etc.). Turning food waste
into eco-fertilizer. |
The greatest environmental
benefits will come from the carbon reduction by improvement of Building Energy
Efficiency, followed by Energy Infrastructure (District Cooling System) and Renewable
Energy (Solar Hot Water System and Photovoltaic). The actual carbon savings
achievement by those initiatives related to Building Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy are subject to the extent of application by the building
developers / owners, as well as the environmental awareness of the future
occupants.
16.6 Summary of Measures Adopted to Avoid and Minimize Environmental Impacts
The various chapters of this EIA Report have presented key measures to minimise the potential environmental impacts associated with the Project in the planning, design, construction and operational stages. Key measures to minimise the environmental impacts are summarised below.
16.6.1 Consideration of Development Options
More than 90% of the proposed development will involve Higher Education, High-tech R&D and C&C Industries. Compared with other options such as industrial and commercial uses, adverse environmental impact in terms of night time noise, glare and vehicular emission due to night time operations could be avoided.
In particular, no industrial use is proposed in the Revised PLP and thus there will be no chimney emissions and impact to residential uses including those nearby villages and hostels with the LMC Loop.
16.6.2 Route Selection of External Connections
Minimising environmental impacts has been one of the key design objectives throughout the planning and design process. Where practicable, protection of environmental sensitive areas has been considered. Sections 16.2 and 16.5 have described the population and environmental sensitive areas protected, and the environmental friendly design adopted. A summary of these is given below:
· Minimize the WCR footprint by possible utilisation of existing roads such as LMC Road and Ha Wan Tsuen Road (Section 16.5.1.1).
· Use of depressed road/shallow underpass across the fishponds and Meander for ECR so as to prevent fragmentation of wetland and disturbance to bird flight paths (Section 16.5.1.2).
· Optimize the alignment of the Direct Link to LMC Station to follow the existing railway reserve of the LMC Spur Line to minimise the ecological impact (Section 16.5.1.3).
16.6.3 Phasing of Implementation
In order to
minimize the environmental nuisance during construction phase, the Project will
be implemented in phases. In general, all the construction and operation will
be divided into 2 phases. In addition, in order to maintain the ecological
values of wetlands, all the ecological compensation such as fishponds
provisions and EA establishment will be conducted prior to infrastructures. Table 16.2 summarises the phasing of
implementation.
Table
16.2 Summary of implementation programme
Phasing |
Description of Work |
Time Line |
Advance Works |
Fishpond
compensation |
Late 2013/Early 2014
– 2015 |
Land
de-contaminations |
||
Establishment of
Ecological Area (DP1) |
||
Phase 1
Infrastructures |
Site formations
works |
2015 – 2020 |
Land reserve of
boundary crossing facilities |
||
Western Connection
Road including the connections between LMC Road and Fanling/San Tin Highway
(DP2) |
||
Direct Link to
Lok Ma Chau Station (DP3) |
||
Drainage System
under Internal Transport Networks (DP4) |
||
Sewage Treatment
Works (DP5) |
||
District Cooling
System (Western) |
||
Bio-remediation |
||
Landscaping
Works at Open Spaces |
||
Phase 1
Buildings |
Construction and
operation of Phase 1 Buildings |
Construction:
2016 to 2020 / Operation: 2020 |
Construction and
operation of fire station cum ambulance depot |
||
Phase 2
Infrastructures |
District Cooling
System (Eastern) |
2021 - 2027 |
Eastern
Connection Road (DP6) |
||
Flush Water
Service Reservoir (DP7) |
||
Landscaping
Works at Open Spaces |
||
Phase 2 Buildings
(Full Operation) |
Construction and
operation of Phase 2 Buildings |
Construction:
2024 to 2027 / Operation: 2027 |
16.6.4 Construction Dust
During
construction phase, watering 8 times per day to all exposed area will be implemented.
In addition, other dust suppression measures stipulated in the Air Pollution
Control (Construction Dust) Regulation and good site practices would be in
place to further minimize construction dust impact. Some examples of these good
site practices include:
· Any excavated or stockpile of dusty material should be covered entirely by impervious sheeting or sprayed with water to maintain the entire surface wet and then removed or backfilled or reinstated where practicable within 24 hours of the excavation or unloading;
· Any dusty materials remaining after a stockpile is removed should be wetted with water and cleared from the surface of roads;
· A stockpile of dusty material should not be extended beyond the pedestrian barriers, fencing or traffic cones;
· The load of dusty materials on a vehicle leaving a construction site should be covered entirely by impervious sheeting to ensure that the dusty materials do not leak from the vehicle;
· Where practicable, vehicle washing facilities with high pressure water jet should be provided at every discernible or designated vehicle exit point. The area where vehicle washing takes place and the road section between the washing facilities and the exit point should be paved with concrete, bituminous materials or hardcores;
· When there are open excavation and reinstatement works, hoarding of not less than 2.4m high should be provided as far as practicable along the site boundary with provision for public crossing. Good site practice shall also be adopted by the Contractor to ensure the conditions of the hoardings are properly maintained throughout the construction period.
16.6.5
Odour
Odour
control devices will be installed to reduce the odour emissions from the
proposed STW for the LMC Loop. The required odour removal efficiency should be at least 95% (Section 15.4.3).
Bioremediation
for odour removal will take place at the Shenzhen River section adjacent to the
LMC Loop development. Indicator of odour level, in terms of AVS and Redox, at Shenzhen
River will be monitored during operational phase. In
case of any non-compliance with the criteria for residual AVS or redox
potential in sediment, increase in chemical dosage frequency during
bioremediation works will be undertaken to prevent the recurrence of odour
impact from Shenzhen River.
16.6.6
Construction
Noise
The
following mitigation measures have been considered to tackle the construction
noise impact:
· Good site practices to limit noise emissions at the source;
· Use of quiet plant and working methods;
· Use of site hoarding as noise barrier to screen noise at ground level of NSRs;
· Use of temporary noise barriers to screen noise from relatively static PMEs;
· Scheduling of construction works outside school examination periods in critical area;
· Alternative use of plant items within one worksite, wherever practicable;
· Use of temporary noise barriers to screen noise from construction vehicles accessing LMC Loop; and
· Operation of concrete lorry mixer approximately 25m away from the existing NSRs along Lok Ma Chau Road, Ha Wan Tsuen Road and planned NSRs at eco-lodge along Border Road.
16.6.7
Road
Traffic Noise
In
order to tackle the future road traffic noise impact from the ECR and WCR, the
following mitigation measures were proposed:
· Noise barrier; and
· Provision of centralised air conditioning at the first layer of buildings of Road M1.
16.6.8 Water Quality
Good
site practices such as temporary drainage, dike or embankment for flood
protection, efficient silt removal facilities, covering exposed areas with
tarpaulin, vehicular washing facilities at construction site exits, oil
interceptors etc would be implemented to minimize water quality impacts during
the construction phase. Practice Note for Professional Persons on Construction Site Drainage,
Environmental Protection Department, 1994 (ProPECC PN 1/94) should be fully
implemented.
During
the construction of ECR, proper site drainage system with adequate silt removal
facilities should be deployed in order to prevent polluted runoff discharged to
the Ma Tso Lung Nullah and the Meander. A discharge license should be obtained
from EPD prior to any site runoff discharge.
The
construction works of underpass construction should be conducted during dry
season to prevent excess stormwater runoff to the Meander. Cofferdams or diaphragm
walls should be deployed to fully separate the works and the river waters.
An on-site STW will be
constructed to collect and treat the sewerage from both LMC Loop and the nearby
villages. Membrane Bio-reactor will be used for the on-site STW. Off-site
compensation at SWHSTW for BOD5, SS, TKN, NH3-N and E. coli loading will be undertaken to
comply with the “no net increase in pollution loading in Deep Bay” policy will
be complied.
16.6.10
Waste Management
The amount of C&D material that would need to be transported off site has been minimized as far as practicable in the implementation programme. Opportunity of re-using C&D material has been fully considered and implemented where practicable. Good site practices have been recommended for chemical waste, general refuse and disposal of chemical waste will follow the relevant ordinances.
16.6.11 Land Contamination
The volume of contaminated soil to be treated is tentatively estimated
at 57,444m3 for LMC Loop. The remediation action plan and specification
for remediation works is detailed in the endorsed Remediation Action Plan
(RAP).
No potentially contaminated site was identified within the
contamination assessment area for the associated infrastructure in the adjacent
areas in Hong Kong outside the LMC Loop. Re-appraisal on the LMC Loop and the
entire contamination assessment area for the associated infrastructure in the
adjacent areas in Hong Kong outside Lok Ma Chau Loop would be required to
ensure any potential contamination activities from land use changes after the
approval of this land contamination assessment study, subject to a proper
updating review prior to commencement of the construction works. Where re-appraisal or re-assessment is required, the PP would prepare and submit
the Supplementary CAP to EPD prior to the commencement of SI works. Following
on from the submission of CAP and completion of SI, the PP would prepare a CAR,
a RAP and a RR and submit to EPD for agreement prior to commencement of the
works on the development.
16.6.12 Cultural Heritage
No major
direct and indirect impact to sites of cultural heritage is anticipated. The
only potential impacts from the Project are the indirect visual impact on the
built heritage near LMC Loop and Western Connection Road from its surrounding
development but it can be mitigated by providing plant screening.
16.6.13
Landscape and Visual
The design
of the proposed building structures and road connections networks will
incorporate design features as part of visual mitigation measures including integrated
design approach, building massing, treatment of built structures, responsive
finishes for the proposed structures, incorporation of the form of greening
measures, and innovative architectural design.
The design
of noise barrier will reduce the visual effect of the structure through the use
of form, materials, textures and colours.
Trees and
vegetation will be reinstated below or adjacent to the structures. Planting
will be used wherever possible to minimise the apparent height of structures
and to soften their appearance in medium and long distance views.
The design
of the viaduct will avoid unnecessary visual clutter, this will be achieved
through the co-ordination of the various engineering disciplines involved to
arrive at innovative design solutions. For example, the location of columns of
viaduct should not block any views from VSRs in the proximity and the shape of
column should be slimmed down as far as technically feasible to reduce the
structural mass at street level, at where space is allowed planting area for
shade tolerant tree, shrub and climber species would be provided at the base of
the column to soften the vertical emphasis at street level.
16.6.14
Ecology
A wetland
compensation programme will be implemented. An Ecological Area will be created
to compensate for the direct loss of reedbeds within LMC Loop (Section 16.4.2). The fishponds,
marshlands, reedbeds and woodland outside LMC Loop will be compensated offsite
in San Tin and Hoo Hok Wai.
All the ecological compensation will be established prior to major
construction works in order to avoid loss of net ecological value.
16.6.15 Food Safety
A contingency plan was established for food safety implication due to
fish consumption from nearby fishponds. An
effective communication channel with Food and Environmental Hygiene Department
(FEHD) / Centre of Food Safety (CFS) will be set up on food surveillance and
food incidents. If pond fish samples do not comply with food safety standards
during the food surveillance programme by CFS, fish selling shall be stopped as
instructed by CFS.
This section provides descriptions of the environmental and operation variables and parameters to be monitored, and the purpose for which should be monitored, e.g. as an indication of general background conditions or as an indicator of unacceptable environmental impact.
In
accordance with the requirements as stipulated in Annex 21 of the TM-EIAO, it
is considered necessary to conduct the Environmental Monitoring and Audit
(EM&A) programme during the construction, operation, restoration and
aftercare phases of the Project and to define the relevant scope of EM&A
requirements, including:
· Provision of a database against which to determine any short- or long-term environmental impacts of the Project;
· Provision of an early indication that any of the environmental control measures or other operation practices are failing to achieve the required standards;
· Provision of data to determine the effectiveness of any mitigation or control measures implemented through amendments in procedures during the life of Project;
· Provision of data to enable an environmental audit of the construction, operation, restoration and aftercare works to be undertaken; and
· Assessment of compliance with the environmental and pollution control and operation requirements.
A project organisation consisting of the Engineer’s Representative (ER), Independent Environmental Checker (IEC), Environmental Team (ET), Project Proponent and Contractors should be established to take on the responsibilities for environmental protection for the Project. The IEC will be appointed by the Project Proponent to conduct independent auditing on the overall EM&A programme including environmental and operation monitoring, implementation of mitigation measures, EM&A submissions, and any other submission required under the Environmental Permit (EP). The organisation, responsibilities of respective parties and lines of communication with respect to environmental protection works are given in the EM&A Manual.
EM&A
is an important aspect in the EIA process which specifies the timeframe and responsibilities for the implementation
of environmental mitigation measures. The requirements on environmental monitoring
(including baseline and impact monitoring) are given in the
EM&A Manual.
A EM&A Manual
specific to the Project will be prepared based on individual contractual requirements and latest
design information by the ET. The project specific EM&A Manual will highlight the following issues:
· Organisation, hierarchy and responsibilities of the Contractor, Project Proponent, ET and IEC with respect to the EM&A requirements during construction and operational phases of the Project;
· Information on project organisation and programming of construction activities;
· Requirements with respect to the construction schedule and necessary EM&A programme to track the varying environmental impacts;
· Details of methodologies to be adopted, including all field, laboratory and analytical procedures, and details on quality assurance;
· Procedure for undertaking on-site environmental audits;
· Definition of Action and Limit Levels;
· Establishment of Event and Action Plans;
· Requirements of reviewing pollution sources and working procedures required in the event of non-compliance of environmental criteria and complaints;
· Requirements for reviewing the implementation of mitigation measures, and effectiveness of environmental protection and pollution control measures adopted; and
· Presentation of requirements for EM&A data and appropriate reporting procedures.
17.4 Project Implementation Schedule
A Project Implementation Schedule (PIS) has
been prepared and included in Appendix
17.1 and the EM&A Manual to summarise all the required mitigation
measures need to be implemented during the construction and operational phases
of the Project. The implementation
responsibilities are also identified in the PIS. The EM&A Manual will also present the
requirements for environmental monitoring and auditing (e.g. monitoring and
audit frequency), throughout the entire construction phase.
The Contractor should review the mitigation
measures and PIS with respect to the design developments and construction
methodology. In case the Contractor
needs to update the mitigation measures and PIS, the EM&A Manual should be
updated accordingly.
Detailed requirements of the EM&A
programme are described in the EM&A Manual.
Measurements and activities are summarised as follows:
· Baseline monitoring (construction dust, odour, airborne noise, traffic noise, water, ecology etc.);
· Impact monitoring (construction dust, odour, airborne noise, traffic noise, water, ecology etc);
· Monitoring of successfulness of ecological mitigation measures including utilisation of temporary and permanent compensatory wetland habitat by target fauna species.
· Remedial actions in accordance with the Event and Action Plan within the timeframe in case the specified criteria in the EM&A Manual being exceeded;
· Logging and keeping records of monitoring results;
· Real-time reporting of construction monitoring data, wherever practicable, for the Project through a dedicated internet website; and
· Preparation and submission of Monthly, Quarterly and Final EM&A Reports.
This EIA Report has provided an assessment of the
potential environmental impacts associated with all stages throughout
implementation and the cumulative effects due to interfacing planned, committed
and existing projects in the vicinity of the Project. Impact avoidance and
minimization approaches have been proposed and mitigation measures have been
recommended to alleviate the predicted environmental impact to the maximum
practicable extent.
To
promote low carbon and green community, a number of green initiatives such as
the environmentally friendly transport system, district cooling system and
on-site sewage treatment works with effluent recycling for flushing, irrigation and make-up
water for DCS were
formulated as recommended technical guidelines for future developers’
considerations. The implementation of these green initiatives will be subject
to separate EIA studies (if identified as DPs) and engineering findings during
detailed design
stage.
18.3.1 Construction Phase
Results of the hourly, daily and annual average TSP
concentrations are all in compliance with the AQO criteria with the
implementation of water suppression measures. In
addition, procedures and requirements given in the Air
Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation should be
incorporated by the Contractor. With these measures, it is concluded that there will be no adverse residual air quality impact
during construction phase.
18.3.2 Operational Phase
On-site STW will be equipped with odour removal system with 95% odour removal efficiency as a mitigation measure and adverse odour impact due to the project are not anticipated.
With the implementation of bioremediation along the section of Shenzhen River approximately 1.9km downstream of, 1km upstream of and 1.3km along the Loop development (i.e. approximately 4.2 km in total) at 98% odour removal efficiency, short-medium term residual impact of odour at the ASRs within the LMC Loop area were predicted. As a short-term enhancement and contingency measure for reduction of indoor odour level before the completion of mitigation measures on Shenzhen River, the developers could consider to install odour removal system (i.e. activated carbon filter or selective catalytic filter etc.) capable of 95% removal efficiency in buildings with central air conditioning in the development. If the odour removal system were in place, the odour criterion would be met inside all internal spaces. In the long term, with continuous improvement of Shenzhen River, the odour criterion will be achieved.
In order to assure the 98% odour removal efficiency along the section of Shenzhen River approximately 1.9km downstream of, 1km upstream of and 1.3km along the Loop development (i.e. approximately 4.2 km in total), the relationship between AVS reduction percentage and odour removal efficiency will be established by in-situ testing during the detailed design stage. At the same time, the optimum chemical dosage and injection frequency for the bioremediation work will also be established. If the removal efficiency of bioremediation is lower than 98%, chemical dosage and frequency during bioremediation works will be increased to restore the difference.
18.4.1 Construction Phase
Construction noise assessment has been conducted. Results indicate that the noise impacts on all of the NSRs after the implementation of good site practices, temporary noise barriers and use of site hoarding, quiet plants and practical mitigation measures including the setting of the concrete lorry mixer at around 25m away from the existing NSRs along Ha Wan Tsuen Road and Lok Ma Chau Road and planned NSRs at eco-lodge along Border Road. By implementing the aforesaid feasible mitigation measure, typical NSRs including HWTR-6, HWTR-11 and EL-P3 would be within the stipulated noise criterion.
Construction access road traffic noise assessment on the access route along LMC Road and Ha Wan Tsuen Road for advance works at Year 2016 and along Sai Kwo Road, Lok Ma Chau Road and Ha Wan Tsuen Road for site formation at Year 2020 has been conducted. With the implementation of temporary noise barrier, most NSRs along Lok Ma Chau Road, Sai Kwo Road and Ha Wan Tsuen Road would be within their respective noise criteria and where exceedances were predicted, those contribution due to access road is less than 1dB(A) (i.e. 0.0dB(A)) and within the noise criterion of 70 dB(A). Hence the traffic noise impact from the construction access vehicle is insignificant.
18.4.2 Operational Phase
In
operational phase, road traffic noise impacts which are based on the worst case
scenario of the traffic impact assessment have been investigated. Traffic noise
impact on the most of the noise sensitive receivers outside the LMC Loop will be mitigated by 0.8m to 5m reflective noise
barriers to within their respective noise criteria and where exceedances are
predicted, those contribution due to project road is
less than 1dB(A) (i.e. 0.0dB(A) to 0.2dB(A)) and within the noise
criterion of 70 dB(A). Hence road traffic noise impact from the project road is
insignificant. In addition, provision of central air conditioning for the first layer of noise
sensitive receivers facing Road M1 has been allowed to mitigate the noise
impact from road traffic noise. Fixed noise source
sound power level limits are specified for sewage treatment works and DCS (provisional) with necessary noise control measures to satisfy the noise
criterion.
With full implementation of the mitigation measures such as good site practices, storm water pollution control plan, proper construction method, etc, no adverse impact is anticipated. No residual impact and cumulative impact is anticipated during both the construction and operational phase of the Project. In order to ensure effectiveness of the implemented mitigation, regular water quality monitoring in the meander are recommended during the construction phase.
18.6 Sewerage and Sewage Treatment Implications
Under the present condition, there is no public sewerage system in the vicinity of proposed development site. The proposed LMC Loop development will generate additional sewage flows and loads which cannot be handled by the existing YLSTW or SWHSTW. In order to meet the prevailing water quality policies of “No net increase in pollution load”, treatment facility will be required for the generated sewage from LMC Loop development.
On-site STW and off-site load compensation at SWHSTW is recommended. In addition, MBR is recommended as the sewage treatment process to be adopted in the on-site STW, which requires smaller footprint and generates effluent quality readily for TSE reuse purpose. In order to meet “No net increase in pollution load” in Deep Bay upgrading of SWHSTW is recommended to compensate for the residual loads and the proposal is recommended to be taken into consideration in the ongoing Study for expansion/upgrading of SWHSTW.
18.7 Waste Management Implications
Potential waste management implications from the generation of waste
during the construction phase have been evaluated. Measures, including the
opportunity for on-site sorting, reusing excavated fill materials etc., are
devised in the construction methodology to minimise the surplus materials
disposal. Recommendations have been made for implementation by the Contractor
during the construction phase to minimise waste generation and off-site
disposal. The disposal quantities for C&D materials
and their disposal methods have also been assessed.
It is estimated that total 1,391,900m3 of inert materials
would be generated from the Project. 976,700m3 of the generated
inert materials would be reused on-site and the remaining would be disposed of
in Public Fill Reception Facilities.
On the other hand, total 271,500m3 non-inert materials would
also be generated. 247,500m3 of the generated non-inert material
(i.e. non-inert swamp deposit) would be reused on-site and in the concurrent
projects such as NENT NDA, and the remaining would be disposed of in landfill.
Besides, total 64,000m3 of sediment would be generated during the construction of Eastern and Western connection roads. All sediment would be reused on-site and in the concurrent projects such as NENT NDA.
18.7.2 Operational Phase
The types of waste that would be generated during the operational phase have been assessed. Recommendations have been made to ensure proper treatment and disposal of these wastes. It is estimated that LMC Loop at full operation stage would recycle 14,396 tonnes per annum (tpa) out of 24,954tpa of municipal solid waste (MSW), leaving 10,558tpa of MSW that would need disposal to landfill.
18.8 Land Contamination Impact
The land
contamination assessment has examined the potential contaminative landuses
within the project area and their potential impacts to future use. The
assessment involved site appraisal, site investigation, assessment of
contamination extent and where necessary formulation of remedial actions.
5 zones
within LMC Loop were identified as contaminated by metal Arsenic. The volume of contaminated soil is
tentatively estimated as 57,444m3.
Remediation
by Solidification/Stabilization is recommended. Mitigation measures are
proposed during excavation for remediation of the contaminated soil in order to
safeguard the general environmental, health and safety on site during the
construction phase.
In addition, re-appraisal on the LMC Loop and the entire contamination assessment area for the associated infrastructure in the adjacent areas in Hong Kong outside Lok Ma Chau Loop would be required to ensure any potential contamination activities from land use changes after the approval of this land contamination assessment study, subject to a proper updating review prior to commencement of the construction works. Where re-appraisal or re-assessment is required, the project proponent would prepare and submit the Supplementary Contamination Assessment Plan (CAP) to EPD prior to the commencement of SI works. Following on from the submission of CAP and completion of SI, the project proponent would prepare a Contamination Assessment Report (CAR), a Remediation Action Plan (RAP) and a Remediation Report (RR) and submit to EPD for agreement prior to commencement of the works on the development.
The project will not involve the use or storage of explosives during the construction phase. Therefore, hazard to life due to use and storage of explosives would not be an issue.
18.10 Impacts on Sites of Cultural Heritage
The desktop review and field surveys of cultural heritage (archaeological heritage, built heritage and declared monument) within the 300m assessment area from the Project suggests that impacts from the Project are negligible.
The only potential impacts from the
Project are the indirect visual impact on the built heritage near LMC Loop and
Western Connection Road from its surrounding development but it can be
mitigated by providing plant screening.
18.11 Landscape and Visual Impacts
18.11.1
Landscape
Impact
With the
implementation of landscape mitigation
measures following the
completion of the works, including
limited works areas, minimise disturbance to existing trees and other landscape
resources, implementation of tree preservation, protection and compensatory
planting proposals, reinstatement of disturbed fishpond and woodland, creation of woodland and wetland,
application of roadside amenity planting, planting on the LMC Loop, green roof
and green wall system and greening measures on retaining wall, slopes and built
structures, the residual (mitigated) impacts
during construction phase (Day 1) on the majority of the identified
landscape resources and landscape
character areas would
be moderate to
negligible and the residual (mitigated) impacts during operation phase (Yr 10) on the majority of the identified landscape
resources and landscape character
areas would be slight beneficial to
negligible.
Construction Residual
(Mitigated) Impact (Day 1)
·
Slight to moderate adverse mitigated impact (Day1) on 19 out of 57 LRs
identified within the Study Area.
·
Negligible mitigated impact
(Day1) on 38 LRs identified within
the Study Area.
·
Moderate adverse mitigated impact (Day1) on the character of LMC Loop
Riverside Landscape.
·
Slight adverse mitigated impacts (Day 1) on 6
out of 9 LCAs identified within the
Study Area
Operation Residual (Mitigated) Impact (Yr 10)
·
Slight Beneficial mitigated Impact (Yesr10) on LR Trees on the LMC Loop.
·
Negligible mitigated impact (Year 10) on all remaining 56 LRs identified
within the Study Area.
·
Slight adverse mitigated impact
(Year 10) on the character of LMC Loop
Riverside Landscape.
·
Negligible mitigated impacts
(Year 10) on all remaining LCAs.
18.11.2
Visual
Impact
With the
implementation of visual mitigation measures following the
completion of the works, including limited works areas, screening measures for temporary and permanent
works, location of temporary and permanent works away from VSRs, minimise disturbance to existing visual context and landscape characters, implementation of planting
proposals and screening buffer to
proposed built structures, reinstatement of disturbed fishpond and
woodland, creation of woodland and wetland, application of roadside amenity
planting, planting on the LMC Loop, green roof and green wall system and
greening measures on retaining wall, slopes and built structures to enhance visual amenity, the
residual (mitigated) impacts during construction phase (Day 1) on the majority
of the identified VSRs would be moderate to negligible and the residual (mitigated) impacts during
operation phase (Yr 10) on the majority of the identified VSRs would be slight to negligible.
Construction Residual Impact (Day 1)
·
Moderate adverse mitigated impacts
(Day 1) on 7 out of 28 VSRs identified within the visual envelope of proposed
works who located in proximity to or have an overview to the proposed works.
·
Slight adverse to negligible
mitigated impacts (Day 1) on 17 out of 28 VSRs identified within the visual envelope of proposed works.
Operation Residual Impact (Yr 10)
·
Slight adverse mitigated impacts (Year 10) on 7 out of 28 VSRs identified within the visual envelope of proposed
works.
Negligible mitigated impacts (Year 10) on the remaining VSRs identified within the visual envelope of proposed works.
18.11.3
Tree Impact
There are
approximately 6,660 existing trees on the LMC Loop and within the limit of
works areas. According to the preliminary engineering layouts
of proposed works contained in Chapter 2 of this EIA, some of existing trees are inevitable to be in conflict with the construction works, the proposed works require transplanting of approximately 279 trees and felling of approximately 4,022 trees.
New
planting areas within the LMC Loop including tree planting in landscape buffer,
open spaces and roadside planting areas will accommodate approximately 5,000
new trees.
New
planting areas along the road alignment of WCR (DP2), ECR (DP6) and access road
to Flushing Water Service Reservoir (DP7) will accommodate approximately 2,600
new trees.
500 whips will be planted
on the newly formed and
remnant sloping areas along the road alignment. Slopes have a
gradient more than 30 degree will be hydroseeded.
Based on a
preliminary estimation, the above planting proposal would achieve a replanting
ratio of minimum 1:1 in terms of quantity and quality except for slope works
according to ETWB TCW No. 3/2006. This tree replanting ratio would compensate
the total girth and number of tree loss as well as the total number of tree
loss on sloping area.
The above
recommendation on existing trees is preliminary and subject to the detailed
tree survey and tree felling application to be submitted for LandsD/Government
approval at detailed design stage of the project in accordance with ETWB TWC
No. 3/2006 Tree Preservation.
The ecological baseline study has identified a number of habitats and
species of conservation significance potentially impacted by the Project.
Foremost among these is reed marsh in LMC Loop, LMC Meander, Eurasian Otter,
the flight line corridor in areas over and adjacent to LMC Loop and a stream network
at Ma Tso Lung for which there is a record of Three-banded Box Terrapin.
Construction and operation of development associated with the Project
will result in a range of ecological impacts some of which, if unmitigated, are
predicted to cause ecological impact of high significance. The key habitat
losses and disturbance impacts are as follows:
Permanent Impacts
·
Permanent
loss of 10.96ha of reed marsh and 0.50ha of marsh in LMC Loop.
·
Permanent
loss of ecological function (arising from habitat loss and disturbance impacts)
of 9.70ha of pond.
·
Permanent
loss of 2.33ha of marsh.
·
Permanent
loss of 0.19ha of seasonally wet grassland.
·
Permanent
loss of 1.26ha of woodland and shrubland.
·
Permanent
loss of 0.15ha of riparian vegetation along LMC Meander.
·
Permanent
loss of 80-160m² of LMC Meander river bed and water column.
Temporary Impacts on Functional
Value of Habitats
·
Temporary
loss of functional value of 4.11ha to 6.36 ha of pond, duration depending on
phase of project, but total period approx. 7 years.
·
Temporary loss of 0.032 ha of disturbed reed marsh
during construction of Direct Link.
·
Temporary of effective loss of 1.10 ha of reed
marsh in EA during construction of Eastern Connection Road, duration 18 months.
·
Temporary
loss of riparian vegetation along LMC Meander due to stabilisation works,
duration up to 4 years though not concurrently.
Secondary Impacts
·
Disturbance
to LMC Meander.
·
Fragmentation
impacts on movements of large waterbirds, herpetofauna and mammals, including
Eurasian Otter arising from infrastructural connections and disturbance from
buildings.
·
Disturbance
impacts to Eurasian Otter, mainly due to construction-related activities.
·
Potential
run-off impacts on watercourses.
·
Increased
wildlife mortality due to noise barriers.
Key mitigation measures comprise the following:
·
Creation
of 12.78ha Ecological Area containing reed marsh and marsh habitat to
compensate for habitat loss in LMC Loop, and a buffer area of 50m width.
·
Use
of underpass below LMC Meander and depressed road through fish ponds at HHW.
·
Provision
of permanent compensatory off-site wetland areas totalling a minimum of
11.72ha.
·
Provision
of temporary compensatory off-site wetland areas totalling a minimum of 6.36ha
in construction phase.
·
Implementation
of lower building heights near to EA.
·
Banks
of LMC Meander to be stabilised and re-vegetated after completion.
·
Site
formation works in EA and bank stabilisation works alongside LMC Meander to be
carried out in wet season.
·
Installation
of 3m-high olive green fence site hoarding around construction areas to reduce
disturbance and allow or deter animal passage as required.
·
Implement
standard measures to minimise magnitude of construction run-off and spillage
events.
·
Use
of mechanised equipment only during the period 9am to 5pm.
·
No
use of direct lighting on LMC Meander.
·
Provision
of wildlife underpasses and one 70m-wide overpass as part of Eastern Connection
Road.
·
Phasing
of work on Eastern Connection Road to avoid concurrent working in sections of
critical ecological value.
·
Use
of viaducts to cross streams.
·
Where
possible, wet season work only in critical areas of fish ponds.
·
Use
of opaque noise barriers along roads to minimise wildlife mortality.
Adverse
residual impacts after implementation of mitigation measures are all assessed as
of Low severity, and comprise the following:
·
temporary loss for
2-3 years (depending on establishment period required) of 2.50ha of reed marsh
to allow site formation of the Ecological Area..
·
temporary loss for
18 months of riparian vegetation of LMC Meander due to construction of the
Eastern Connection Road. Through design, the vegetation will be reprovided
after construction.
·
temporary loss of
riparian vegetation due to raising of level of LMC Loop and stabilisation of
banks of LMC Meander over period of 4 years;
·
permanent loss of
0.15ha of riparian vegetation of LMC Meander and river bed under footprint of
Western Connection Road.
·
permanent loss of
80-160m² of LMC Meander river bed and water column;
·
temporary loss of
1.26ha of woodland and shrubland due to construction of ECR. This will resolve
itself in 20-30 years once the area of planted trees reaches maturity.
Since the pond areas to be lost do not account for a significant proportion of the total fish pond area in Hong Kong, the fisheries impact is not considered to be significant. Indirect impacts arising from construction activities and operation of the proposed development would be properly mitigated through standard practices and thus no significant fisheries impact will appear. Overall, no unacceptable fisheries impact are predicted from this project.
Landfill
gas hazard assessment is not required as the development is outside the 250m
Consultation Zone of Ma Tso Lung Landfill (MTLL) and there is no impact on the
restoration and aftercare facilities of MTLL.
Estimated contaminant concentrations in fish attributed to
indirect impact is insignificant compared with the Food Safety Standards under
Hong Kong Regulations, and thus potential food safety implications is not
anticipated.
18.16 Environmental Monitoring and Audit
An Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) programme has been established and the scope of EM&A requirements has been detailed in the EM&A Manual.