Table of contents

                          

1      INTRODUCTION.. 1-1

1.1         Background. 1-1

1.2         Objectives of the EIA Study. 1-2

1.3         Structure of EIA Report 1-3

 

 

1                         INTRODUCTION

1.1                   Background

1.1.1             The proposed sewerage works in Po Toi O is an environmental enhancement project that aims to improve environmental hygiene of the Po Toi O area.

1.1.2             Po Toi O is located in the southern part of Sai Kung District, next to Clear Water Bay. There is a small settlement called Po Toi O village around the bay. There is currently no public sewerage system for the village. Sewage and wastewater generated by local residents and local restaurants are treated by septic tanks/soakaway system (STS).

1.1.3             Provision of proper sewerage system to unsewered villages is a general government policy. Without centralized public sewage treatment facility, villagers have to regularly desludge the STS to maintain the cleaning performance and to avoid overflow of sewage. However, the desludging process may bring along potential hygiene and associated odour issues. Under the Port Shelter Sewerage Master Plan (SMP), Drainage Services Department (DSD) has proposed sewerage works at Po Toi O. In addition to improving local hygiene conditions and removing associated odour problem, the provision of sewerage is a preventive measure to avoid potential environmental problems due to insufficient desludging or structural defect of the STS. This can also relieve villagers’ burden to maintain their STS (e.g. desludging).

1.1.4             The proposed sewerage works comprise sewage collection, treatment and disposal facilities at Po Toi O under Port Shelter Sewerage, Stage 3 – Sewerage Works at Po Toi O (hereinafter referred to as “the Project”). The location and details of the facilities are illustrated in Figure 1-1.

1.1.5             The Project mainly comprises the following works:

                                  i.          Provision of village sewerage to the unsewered areas of Po Toi O. The works involve construction of about 800m of gravity sewers and 400m of rising mains;

                                ii.          Construction of a local sewage treatment plant (STP) with Average Dry Weather Flow (ADWF) of about 139m3/day; and

                              iii.          Construction of a submarine outfall of about 385m in length.

1.1.6             The Project consists of the following designated projects under Part I, Schedule 2 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO):

l    Item  Q.1    A  sewage  treatment  plant  and  portion  of  sewer  alignments  in  a conservation area;

l    Item C.12 (a) (v) and (vii) – A dredging operation  which is less than 500m from the nearest boundary of an existing fish culture zone and coastal protection area; and

l    Item F.6 – A submarine sewage outfall.

1.1.7             A project profile (PP-483/2013) has been submitted to the Environmental Protection Department in February 2013 and a study brief (ESB- 258/2013) has been issued to the DSD in April 2013.

1.1.8             Cinotech Consultants Limited (Cinotech) has been commissioned by the DSD in January 2014 to conduct an environmental impact assessment for the Project in order to investigate the environmental acceptability during construction and operation of the proposed sewerage works.  Black & Veatch Hong Kong Limited (hereafter called “the Engineer”) is the consulting engineer employed by the DSD to design the proposed sewerage facilities in this Project, among other tasks. Urbis Limited and LWK & Partners (HK) Limited provided expert input in landscape and visual impact and built heritage impact assessments respectively.

1.2                   Objectives of the EIA Study

1.2.1             The objective of this Assignment is to carry out an environmental impact assessment to investigate the environmental acceptability during construction and operation of the sewerage works. Potential impacts, especially on water quality, were identified and evaluated to address public concerns. Throughout this process, close contact was made and regular meetings were held with the DSD and the Engineer to derive practical solutions for the sewerage works layout, construction and operation methods. A preferred option was determined that can optimize environmental benefits while minimizing undesirable impacts (e.g. dispersal of effluent to water sensitive receivers).

1.2.2             Detailed objectives as per the Study Brief are as follows:

(i)                 to describe the Project and associated works together with the requirements and environmental benefits for carrying out the Project and the types of designated projects to be covered by the Project;

(ii)               to identify and describe elements of community and environment likely to be affected by the Project and/or likely to cause adverse impacts to the Project, including natural and man-made environment and the associated environmental constraints;

(iii)             to provide information on the consideration of alternative design options of the Project including location, scale, extent, layout, configuration, design, and the construction methods with a view to avoiding and minimizing potential environmental impacts to environmentally sensitive areas and sensitive uses; to compare the environmental benefits and dis-benefits of different options; to provide reasons for selecting the preferred option(s) and to describe the part environmental factors played in the selection of preferred option(s);

(iv)             to identify and quantify emission sources (including air quality, noise, water quality and waste, etc. as appropriate) and determine the significance of impacts on sensitive receivers and potential affected uses;

(v)               to identify and quantify any potential loss or damage and other potential impacts to fisheries, flora, fauna and natural habitats;

(vi)             to identify any potential landscape and visual impacts and to propose measures to mitigate these impacts;

(vii)           to identify any negative impacts on sites of cultural heritage and to propose measures to mitigate these impacts;

(viii)         to propose the provision of infrastructure or mitigation measures to minimize pollution, environmental disturbance and nuisance during construction and operation of Project;

(ix)             to investigate the feasibility, practicability, effectiveness and implications of the proposed mitigation measures;

(x)               to identify, predict and evaluate the residual environmental impacts (i.e. after practicable mitigation) and the cumulative effects expected to arise during the construction and operation phases of the Project in relation to the sensitive receivers and potential affected uses;

(xi)             to identify, assess and specify methods, measures and standards, to be included in the detailed design, construction and operation of the Project which are necessary to mitigate these residual environmental impacts and cumulative effects and reduce them to acceptable levels;

(xii)           to investigate the extent of the secondary environmental impacts that may arise from the proposed mitigation measures and to identify constraints associated with the mitigation measures recommended in the EIA study, as well as the provision of any necessary modification; and

(xiii)         to design and specify environmental monitoring and audit requirements to check the effective implementation of the recommended environmental protection and pollution control measures.

1.3                   Structure of EIA Report

1.3.1             The EIA Report comprises the following Chapters:

l   Ch. 1  Introduction

l   Ch. 2  Project Descriptions

l   Ch. 3  Air Quality Impact

l   Ch. 4  Noise Impact

l   Ch. 5  Water Quality Impact

l   Ch. 6  Terrestrial Ecological Impact

l   Ch. 7  Marine Ecological Impact

l   Ch. 8  Fisheries Impact

l   Ch. 9  Waste Management

l   Ch. 10  Landscape and Visual Impact

l   Ch. 11  Built Heritage Impact

l   Ch. 12  Environmental Monitoring and Audit Requirements

l   Ch. 13  Summary of Environmental Outcomes

l   Ch. 14  Conclusion

l   Ch. 15 Implementation Schedule of Recommended Mitigation Measures