4                             Hazard to life Assessment

4.1                       Introduction

4.1.1                 In accordance with Clause 3.4.4.1 of the EIA Study Brief (No. ESB-274/2014), relevant hazard to life assessment findings related to the Project should be reviewed in order to determine whether an updated hazard to life assessment in the EIA study is necessary. If an updated hazard to life assessment is required to be carried out, technical assessment requirements stipulated in Clauses 3.4.4.2 to 3.4.4.4 of the EIA Study Brief should be followed.

4.2                       Legislation, Standards and Criteria

4.2.1                 The estimated risk levels of the hazardous sources shall be compared with the risk guidelines stipulated in the EIAO-TM Annex 4 to determine the acceptability. As set out in Annex 4 of the EIAO-TM, the risk guidelines comprise individual risk guideline and societal risk guidelines. For individual risk, maximum level of off-site individual risk should not exceed 1 in 100 000 per year (i.e.1x10-5 /year). The societal risk guidelines for acceptable risk levels assessment criteria is also defined in Figure 1 in Annex 4 of the EIAO-TM as provided in Appendix 4.1.

4.3                       Review of Hazard to Life assessment Findings in Previous EIA Study

4.3.1                 The EIA Report “Comprehensive Feasibility Study for The Revised Scheme of South East Kowloon Development” was completed in mid-2001 and approved on 25 September 2001 (No.: AEIAR-044/2001) for the comprehensive feasibility study for the revised scheme of South East Kowloon Development. Since the report was prepared in 2001, an update was conducted by the Kai Tak Development (KTD) EIA as mentioned below.

4.3.2                 The KTD EIA Report was completed in 2008 and approved on 4 March 2009 (No.: AEIAR-130/2009) for the “Kai Tak Development Engineering Study cum Design and Construction of Advance Works – Investigation, Design and Construction. It falls under Item 1 Schedule 3 of the EIAO. The Project site was included under this study.

4.3.3                 According to the Hazard to Life Assessment in the KTD EIA, several hazardous sources were identified as shown in Table 4-1 below. The locations of identified hazardous facilities shown in Figure 11.1.1 of the KTD EIA report is also provided in Appendix 4.2 for reference.

Table 4-1        Hazardous Sources Identified in the Kai Tak Development EIA Report

Hazardous Sources

Locations

Remarks

Distance to the nearest Project Site Boundary (m)

Ma Tau Kok Gas Works (North Plant) and its associated facilities

To Kwa Wan Road, Ma Tau Kok

A designated PHI due to storage of more than 15 tonnes of Town Gas, with a Consultation Zone (CZ) of 300m radius from the mid. point between the two gas holders of the North Works.

 

Associated facilities include the gas pigging station, naphtha unloading jetty, pressure regulating station, landing point for the two 400mm diameter submarine gas pipelines and other operational related facilities situated at the seafront site just next to the Kowloon City Ferry Pier.

 

According to the EIA Report (No. AEIAR-153/2010) Installation of Submarine Gas Pipelines and Associated Facilities from To Kwa Wan to North Point for Former Kai Tak Airport Development, the existing twin 400mm diameter submarine gas pipelines were proposed to be diverted. The Ma Tau Kok gas pigging station shall be relocated close to the existing DSD To Kwa Wan Sewage Treatment Works (about 700m further away from the Project site in compare with the existing pigging station location)

~400m from the North Plant; ~350m from the Pigging station

Chlorine Dock

Cheung Yip Street, Kowloon Bay

It is confirmed in the approved KTD EIA Report that there is plan to decommission and relocate the existing chlorine dock outside the project boundary of Kai Tak Development prior to the future land uses of the KTD Project. Hazard assessment of this hazard source is not required.

N/A

DGV Ferry Pier

Kwun Tong

A ferry pier for DG ferries carrying dangerous goods vehicles.

> 2500m

Kerry DG Warehouse (Kowloon Bay)

7 Kai Hing Road, Kowloon Bay

A DG warehouse for storage of dangerous goods.

>1500m

Petrol cum LPG Filling Stations and Dedicated LPG Filling Stations

Within or in Vicinity to KTD Area

Address of the Petrol cum LPG Filling Stations are:

·             Wang Chin Street, Kowloon Bay

·             Kai Fuk Road, Kowloon Bay (West Bound)

·             8 Kai Fuk Road, Kowloon Bay (West Bound)

·             7 Kai Fuk Road, Kowloon Bay (East Bound)

·             Kai Fuk Road, Kowloon Bay (East Bound)

·             Address of the Dedicated LPG Filling Stations area:

·             Wai Lok Street, Kwun Tong

·             Cheung Yip Street, Kowloon Bay

>480m to >1300m

Explosives Storage and Blasting Operations for KTD

Express within KTD Area

It is confirmed in the KTD EIA Report that no explosives would be used for the construction activities.

N/A

 

Ma Tau Kok Gas Works North Plant (MTKGWNP)

4.3.4                 The MTKGWNP is one of the Towngas production plants in Hong Kong and is classified as a Potentially Hazardous Installation (PHI) which is located adjacent to part of the planning area of the KTD. The plant is located at To Kwa Wan Road with Ma Tau Kok Road and San Shan Road to the northeast and southwest of its boundary respectively.

4.3.5                 The Ma Tau Kok Gas Works (North Plant) is located over 400m from the nearest boundary of the Project and hence the whole Project site is outside the 300m Consultation Zone (CZ) of the PHI.

4.3.6                 In addition to the gas production plant, there are other associated gas facilities in Ma Tau Kok which are over 350m from the Project boundary. These include the gas pigging station, naphtha-unloading jetty, pressure regulating station, landing point for the two 400mm diameter submarine gas pipelines and other operational related facilities situated at a seafront site just next to the Kowloon City Ferry Pier. According to the approved EIA Report (No. AEIAR-153/2010) “Installation of Submarine Gas Pipelines and Associated Facilities from To Kwa Wan to North Point for Former Kai Tak Airport Development”, the existing twin 400mm diameter submarine gas pipelines were proposed to be diverted. The Ma Tau Kok gas pigging station shall be relocated close to the existing DSD To Kwa Wan Sewage Treatment Works where the new proposed location is over 900m from the Project site.

4.3.7                 Potential hazards associated unloading, storage and processing of liquid Naphtha during the gas production process and the hazards related to storage and transmission of Towngas were identified in the approved KTD EIA Report. Hazardous scenarios include pool fire, jet fire, flash fire, fireball, and bund fire were considered.

4.3.8                 Assessment results in the approved KTD EIA report indicated that the 10-5 per year individual risk contour is located inside the boundary of the MTKGWNP. The Project site is located far away from the 10-9 per year individual risk contour and thus the potential risk on the Project is minimal. Since the population of the Project is outside the Consultation Zone of the PHI, the societal risk results in the approved KTD EIA report would not be affected by the Project and the results and conclusion in the approved KTD EIA report are still valid for the Project. The KTD EIA mentioned that the individual risk of the PHI is in compliance with the TM criteria and the societal risk level can be reduced as low as practicable for meeting requirements stipulated in the Hong Kong Risk Guidelines.

Chlorine Dock/ DGV Ferry Pier / Kerry DG Warehouse (Kowloon Bay)

4.3.9                 It is confirmed in the approved KTD EIA Report that the chlorine dock is confirmed to be decommissioned and relocated outside the project boundary of KTD prior to future development. Therefore, hazard arising from the Chlorine Dock is not considered. The DGV Ferry Pier and the Kerry DG Warehouse are located over 1.5km away from the Project site. Referring to the assessment results in the approved EIA report, the Project site is located far away from the 10-9 per year individual risk contour. No potential hazard on the Project is anticipated.

Petrol cum LPG Filling Stations and Dedicated LPG Filling Stations

4.3.10             The study area of 150m radius from the petrol cum LPG station / dedicated LPG station is adopted in the approved KTD EIA Report. It is consistent with other approved EIA studies where 150m study area of the LPG sites was considered. Since the nearest station is about 480m away from the Project site, no potential hazard on the Project arising from the petrol/LPG stations within or in vicinity of KTD is anticipated.

Explosives Storage and Blasting Operations for KTD

4.3.11             It is confirmed in the approved KTD EIA Report that no explosives would be used for the construction activities in the KTD. No blasting operation is required for the Project. Therefore, hazard arising from the explosives storage or blasting operations for KTD/the Project construction is not considered.

4.4                       Review of Existing and Planned Hazard Source in KTD

4.4.1                 Based on the latest available information (including on-site survey and review of OZPs and the latest Recommended Outline Development Plan), no new potentially hazardous installation (PHI) is proposed in the KTD area, and all existing/planned hazardous sources within or in vicinity of KTD have been considered in the approved EIA report for the KTD.

4.5                       Conclusion

4.5.1                 Hazard to Life Assessment in KTD area was fully addressed in the approved Schedule 3 EIA Report for Kai Tak Development (Register No.: AEIAR-130/2009). It has been concluded that no adverse hazard to life impact on the future occupants of the KTD is anticipated. Based on the latest available information, no new PHI is proposed in KTD area and all existing/planned hazardous sources within or in vicinity of KTD were considered in the approved KTD EIA report. The project site falls outside all the Consultation Zones / study areas of the identified hazardous sources. Hence, the findings of the hazard to life assessment related to the Project in the approved EIA report for the KTD remain valid, i.e. adverse potential hazard to life impact during the construction and operation on the Project is not anticipated, and no further hazard to life assessment is required.