Table of Contents

 

7     Waste Management Implications.. 7-1

7.1          Introduction.. 7-1

7.2          Environmental Guidelines, Standards and Criteria.. 7-1

7.3          Description of the Environment.. 7-4

7.4          Identification of Potential Impacts.. 7-4

7.5          Assessment Methodology.. 7-5

7.6          Prediction and Evaluation of Environmental Impacts.. 7-5

7.7          Mitigation of Adverse Environmental Impacts.. 7-12

7.8          Evaluation of Residual Impacts.. 7-21

7.9          Environmental Monitoring and Audit.. 7-21

7.10       Conclusion.. 7-21

 

List of Tables

Table 7.1           Sampling Depths of Different Categories of Sediment.. 7-6

Table 7.2           Summary of Chemical Screening Results.. 7-7

Table 7.3           Estimated Quantities of Sediment under each Disposal Option.. 7-8

Table 7.4           Summary of C&D Materials Quantities Generated.. 7-9

Table 7.5           Record of Floating Refuse Collected within the Lei Yue Mun Channel. 7-11

Table 7.6           Summary of Waste Generation, Waste Handling Procedures and Disposal Outlets   7-18

 

Figures

Figure 7.1          As-Built Sediment Sampling Locations

 

Appendices

Appendix 7.1    Key Findings of Sediment Quality Report (SQR-2007)

Appendix 7.2    Sediment Sampling and Testing Plan

Appendix 7.3    Chemical Testing Result and Disposal Classification

 

 

 


7                     Waste Management Implications

7.1                  Introduction

7.1.1.1         This section identifies the types of waste which are likely to be generated during the construction and operation phases of the Project, and evaluates the potential environmental impacts that may be resulted from the waste generation.

7.1.1.2         Mitigation measures and good site practices, including waste handling, storage and disposal, have been recommended with reference to relevant waste legislation and management guidelines.

7.2                  Environmental Guidelines, Standards and Criteria

7.2.1.1         The criteria and guidelines for accessing waste management implications are outlined in Annex 7 and 15, respectively, of the Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process (EIAO-TM).

7.2.1.2         The following legislation, which has been used in assessing potential impacts, relates to the handling, treatment and disposal of wastes in the Hong Kong SAR:

·         Waste Disposal Ordinance (Cap. 354);

·         Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation (Cap. 354C);

·         Waste Disposal (Charges for Disposal of Construction Waste) Regulation (Cap. 354N);

·         Land (Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance (Cap. 28);

·         Public Health and Municipal Services Ordinance (Cap. 132) - Public Cleansing and Prevention of Nuisances Regulation (Cap 132BK); and

·         Dumping at Sea Ordinance (Cap. 466).

Waste Disposal Ordinance (Cap. 354)

7.2.1.3         The Waste Disposal Ordinance (WDO) prohibits any unauthorized disposal of waste. Construction waste, defined under Cap. 354N of the WDO, means any substance, matter or thing that is generated from construction work and abandoned, whether or not it has been processed or stockpiled before being abandoned, but does not include any sludge, screenings or matter removed in or generated from any desludging, desilting or dredging works. Under the WDO, waste can be disposed of only at designated waste disposal facilities licensed by the Environmental Protection Department (EPD).

Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation (Cap.354C)

7.2.1.4         Under the WDO, the Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation legislates controls over the management of chemical waste, and applies to the possession, storage, collection, transport and disposal of chemical waste. EPD has also issued A Guide to the Chemical Waste Control Scheme (2016), A Guide to the Registration of Chemical Waste Producers (2016) and Code of Practice on the Packaging, Labelling and Storage of Chemical Wastes (1992), which provide guidance for complying with the requirements of the Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation on the packaging, labelling and storage of chemical waste.

Waste Disposal (Charges for Disposal of Construction Waste) Regulation (Cap.354N)

7.2.1.5         Under the Waste Disposal (Charges for Disposal of Construction Waste) Regulation enacted in January 2006, construction waste delivered to a landfill for disposal must not contain more than 50% by weight of inert construction waste material. Construction waste delivered to a sorting facility for disposal must contain more than 50% by weight of inert construction waste material, and construction waste delivered to a Public Fill Reception Facility (PFRF) for disposal must consist entirely of inert construction waste material.

Land (Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance (Cap.28)

7.2.1.6         The inert portion of Construction and Demolition (C&D) materials (including rocks, soil, broken concrete, building debris, etc.) may be disposed of at PFRFs. PFRFs are managed by the Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD) and others. The Land (Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance requires that individuals or companies who dispose of public fill at PFRFs are required to obtain dumping licences. The licences are issued by CEDD under delegated authority from the Director of Lands.

7.2.1.7         Dumping licences and ‘Public Dumping Label’ are issued for each vehicle involved for attachment vehicle windscreen. Under the licence conditions, public fill reception facilities will only accept earth, soil, sand, rubble, brick and tile, rock, boulder, concrete, asphalt, masonry or used bentonite. In addition, in accordance with paragraph 12 of the Development Bureau (DevB) Technical Circular (Works) TC (W) No. 6/2010, Public Fill Committee will advise on the corresponding acceptance criteria for disposal of the inert C&D material. The material shall, however, be free from marine mud, pond mud, household refuse, plastic, metal, industrial and chemical wastes, animal and vegetable matter and any other materials considered unsuitable by the public fill reception facility supervisor.

Public Health and Municipal Services Ordinance (Cap.132) - Public Cleansing and Prevention of Nuisances Regulation

7.2.1.8         The Public Cleansing and Prevention of Nuisances Regulations provides control on illegal dumping of waste on unauthorized (unlicensed) sites. The illegal dumping of wastes can lead to a fine and/or imprisonment.

Dumping at Sea Ordinance (Cap. 466)

7.2.1.9         This Ordinance came into operation in April 1995 and empowers the Director of Environmental Protection (DEP) to control the disposal and incineration of substances and particles at sea for the protection of the marine environment. Under the Ordinance, a dumping permit from the DEP is required for the disposal of regulated substances within and outside the waters of Hong Kong. The permit contains terms and conditions which include the following specifications, but not limited to:

·         Type and quantity of substances permitted to be dumped;

·         Location of the disposal grounds;

·         Requirement of equipment for monitoring the disposal operations; and

·         Environmental monitoring requirements.

7.2.1.10     Marine disposal of any dredged sediment is subject to control under the Dumping at Sea Ordinance. Dredged sediment destined for marine disposal is classified based on its contaminant levels with reference to the Environment, Transport and Works Bureau Technical Circular (Works) No. 34/2002 – Management of Dredged/Excavated Sediment (ETWB TC(W) No. 34/2002). The ETWB TC (W) No. 34/2002 stipulated a set of sediment quality criteria or Chemical Exceedance Levels (CEL) for contaminants including metals, metalloid and organic pollutants.

Environmental Guidelines

7.2.1.11     Environmental guidelines that are related to wastes management and disposal include:

·         WBTC No. 2/93 Public Dumps;

·         WBTC No. 2/93B Public Filling Facilities;

·         WBTC No. 12/2000 Fill Management;

·         ETWB TCW 33/2002 Management of Construction and Demolition Material Including Rock;

·         ETWB TCW 34/2002 Management of Dredged / Excavated Sediment;

·         ETWB TCW 19/2005 Environmental Management on Construction Sites;

·         DEVB TCW No. 06/2010 Trip Ticket System for Disposal of Construction and Demolition Materials;

·         DEVB TCW No. 08/2010 Enhanced Specification for Site Cleanliness and Tidiness;

·         DEVB TCW No. 09/2011 Enhanced Control Measures for Management of Public Fill;

·         Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines Planning, 2016 (PlanD)

·         Code of Practice on the Packaging, Labelling and Storage of Chemical Wastes (EPD);

·         A Guide to the Chemical Waste Control Scheme (EPD); and

·         Section 4.1.3 of Chapter 4 of the Project Administration Handbook (PAH) for Civil Engineering Works, Management of Construction/Demolition Materials including Rocks.

7.2.1.12     The current policy related to the disposal of C&D materials is documented in the WBTC No. 2/93, ‘Public Dumps’. C&D materials that are wholly inert, namely public fill, should not be disposed of at landfill, but be taken to PFRFs, which usually form part of reclamation schemes. 

7.2.1.13     In accordance with the DEVB TC (W) No. 6/2010 ‘Trip Ticket System for Disposal of Construction and Demolition Materials’, all contracts that are expected to generate inert C&D materials (e.g. soil, broken rock, broken concrete and building debris, etc.) requiring disposal from site, the project office shall write to the Public Fill Committee (PFC) through Secretary of the PFC to request a designated disposal ground for incorporation into the tender documents.  For contracts where the estimated amount of non-inert C&D materials requiring disposal at landfill facilities equal or exceed 50m3, the project office shall seek confirmation from the DEP in terms of the availability of landfill facilities for disposal of such materials.  The DEP will designate landfill facilities, if available, for the contract.  Where the estimated amount of non-inert C&D materials to be generated from the contract is less than 50m3, the project office is not required to apply to DEP for designated landfill facilities.  However, the project office should still specify in the tender documents of the appropriate landfill facilities for disposal.

7.2.1.14     Further measures have been introduced under Paragraph 4.1.3 of Chapter 4 of the PAH for Civil Engineering Works to enhance the management of C&D materials including rock, and to minimise its generation at source. The enhancement measures include:

·        Drawing up a Construction and Demolition Materials Management Plan (C&DMMP) at an early design stage to minimise C&D materials generation and to encourage proper management of such materials;

·        Vetting of the C&DMMP prior to upgrading of the project to Category A in the Public Works Programme; and

·        Providing the contractor with information from the C&DMMP in order to facilitate the preparation of Waste Management Plan (WMP) and to minimise C&D materials generation during construction.

7.2.1.15     The ETWB TCW No. 19/2005 Environmental Management on Construction Sites includes procedures on waste management requiring the Contractor to reduce the disposed C&D materials. The Contractor is required to prepare and implement an Environmental Management Plan (EMP), which includes the WMP.

7.2.1.16     ETWB TCW No. 34/2002 Management of Dredged / Excavated Sediment sets out the procedure for seeking approval to and the management framework for marine disposal of dredge/excavate sediment. This Practice Note outlines the requirements to be followed in assessing and classifying the sediment and explains the marine disposal arrangement for the classified material. The sediment quality criteria for the classification of sediment were referred as the Lower Chemical Exceedance Level (LCEL) and Upper Chemical Exceedance Level (UCEL). The LCEL and UCEL are presented in Appendix A of ETWB TCW No. 34/2002. Subject to the results of the chemical screening, biological screening may be required to determine the disposal requirement of the sediment.  There are three types of disposal options for dredged / excavated sediments stipulated in the ETWB TCW No. 34/2002:

·         Type 1 – Open Sea Disposal or Open Sea Disposal in Dedicated Sites;

·         Type 2 – Confined Marine Disposal; and

·         Type 3 – Special Treatment/Disposal.  For Type 3 disposal, the Project Proponent shall be responsible for identifying and agreeing with the DEP the most appropriate treatment and/or disposal arrangement.

7.3                  Description of the Environment

7.3.1.1         The Project site is located at the waterfront of Lei Yue Mun villages beside the LYM Lighthouse. There are village houses, lookout points and a promenade along the waterfront. The coast is sandy in nature and laid with rocky boulder.

7.4                  Identification of Potential Impacts

Construction Phase

7.4.1.1         The construction activities to be carried out for the Project include demolition, construction, and marine dredging. The types of waste generated include:

·         Dredged sediments;

·         Construction and demolition (C&D) materials;

·         Chemical waste

·         General refuse; and

·         Floating refuse.

7.4.1.2         The key construction waste issue for the works would be mainly the handling and disposal of excavated rocks and dredged sediments. Some of the sediments are contaminated and require proper disposal according to ETWB TC No. 34/2002.

Operation Phase

7.4.1.3         Upon Project operation, it is anticipated that major source of wastes would be from tourism. Types of waste to be generated include:

·         General refuse;

·         Floating refuse; and

·         Dredged sediments from maintenance dredging.

7.5                  Assessment Methodology

7.5.1.1         The assessment of the environmental impacts arising from the handling, storage, collection, transportation and disposal of waste material generated by the Project is undertaken in accordance with the Waste Disposal Ordinance (Cap.354). The potential waste management implications of the Project have been assessed by:

·         Estimation on types and quantities of waste generated;

·         Determination of potential impacts arising from waste management in terms of potential hazards, air and odour emissions, noise, wastewater discharge and emission due to public transport;

·         Examination of the opportunities of reducing waste generation;

·         Identification of disposal options for each type of waste; and

·         Assessment of impacts on the capacity of waste collection, transfer and disposal on waste management facilities.

7.5.1.2         The types and quantities of wastes likely to be generated during the construction phase of this Project item should be reviewed and updated for a more detailed assessment and formulation of management practices when the WMP is being prepared by the Contractor as part of the EMP in accordance with ETWB TCW No. 19/2005 for approval by the Engineer.

7.5.1.3         Prior to considering the disposal options for various types of waste, opportunities for reducing waste generation, on-site or off-site reuse and recycling have been evaluated. Measures which can be taken in the planning and design phases (e.g. by modifying the design approach) and in the construction phase for maximizing waste reduction have been separately considered. Practices to promote segregation of waste materials are also considered to enhance the efficiency of waste management.

7.5.1.4         After considering all the opportunities for reducing waste generation and maximizing reuse, the types and quantities of the waste required to be disposed of have been estimated and the disposal options for each type of waste have been described. The disposal method recommended for each type of waste has taken into account the result of the assessment. The impacts caused by handling (including stockpiling, labelling, packaging and storage), collection and reuse / disposal of waste have been addressed and appropriate mitigation measures have been proposed.

7.6                  Prediction and Evaluation of Environmental Impacts

Construction Phase

7.6.1               Dredged Marine Sediments

7.6.1.1         The construction activities to be carried out for the Project that would generate sediment is the dredging works at seabed.  Marine sediments would be dredged from the seabed off the proposed landing facilities to provide sufficient water depth for berthing of vessels as well as constructing the breakwater.

Previous Sediment Quality Data

7.6.1.2         Site investigation (SI) for sediment classification and determination of the disposal options under ETWB TCW No. 34/2002 had been conducted within the proposed dredging extent in September 2006 for the Project.  A Sediment Quality Report (SQR-2007)[1], reporting the findings of the SI works, the sediment categorisation and disposal method, was submitted to EPD for agreement under DASO in March 2007. The key findings of the SQR-2007 is attached in Appendix 7.1.

7.6.1.3         Based on the SQR-2007, 3 sampling locations (viz. SK1, SK2 and SK3) were proposed and boreholes BH7, BH5 and BH3 were constructed at SK1, SK2 and SK3 respectively.

7.6.1.4         A total of 12 samples (including the reference sample) were collected and tested. Out of the 12 samples, 4 were within the proposed dredging extent of –3.646 mPD. Amongst the 4 samples, 3 were classified as Type 2 – Confined Marine Disposal (Category H) sediment and 1 as Type 1 – Open Sea Disposal (Category L) sediment. Table 7.1 summarises the sampling depths of different categories of sediment and corresponding disposal types within the proposed dredging extent of -3.646 mPD.

Table 7.1 Sampling Depths of Different Categories of Sediment

Sampling locations

Drillholes

Sampling depths (m)

Sampling levels (mPD)

Sediment Categories

Disposal Type

SK1

BH7

1.50 – 1.95

-3.60 to -4.05

Cat. H

Type 2

SK2

BH5

1.50 – 1.95

-2.10 to -2.55

Cat. H

Type 2

BH5

2.00 – 2.45

-2.60 to -3.05

Cat. L

Type 1

SK3

BH3

3.00 – 3.45

-3.40 to -3.85

Cat. H

Type 2

7.6.1.5         Since the SQR-2007 were conducted around 10 years ago, re-sampling and testing were undertaken within the proposed dredging extent to provide an update to the sediment quality under this EIA study.

Sediment Sampling and Testing Plan

7.6.1.6         The re-sampling and testing works, including the submission of the Sediment Sampling and Testing Plan (SSTP), were conducted to serve the purpose of fulfilling this EIA Study under the EIAO. The SSTP was prepared, making reference to ETWB TCW No. 34/2002 to present the requirements of the re-sampling and testing works for EPD’s agreement. The SSTP was approved by EPD under EIAO in July 2016 and is attached in Appendix 7.2.

7.6.1.7         For consistency with the SQR conducted in 2007, sediment sampling was proposed at 3 locations to cover the dredging areas where sediment would be found during the construction phase of the Project. The proposed sampling locations fulfilled the 100m x 100m sampling grid for high sediment contamination level as stipulated in ETWB TCW No. 34/2002. The SI works were conducted on 28 October 2016. The laboratory testing was carried out by a HOKLAS accredited laboratory (Wellab Limited).

7.6.1.8         Sediment sampling was carried out using surface grab and vibrocoring. The surface grab sediment was collected by closed grab sampler. For vibrocoring, sediment was proposed to be collected at depths of 0m, 0.9m down, 1.9m down, 2.9m down and then every 3m down until at least 1m below the proposed dredging depth of -3.646 mPD.

7.6.1.9         Based on on-site observation, water depth at the proposed sampling locations was shallow and the seabed within the proposed dredging area were generally covered by sand and rocks. Given the shallow water depth, there were difficulties in gaining access to the proposed sampling locations by the sampling vessel and the sampling locations were subsequently relocated to approximately 8m to 12m from the original locations. The as-built sampling locations, namely DH-1, DH-2 and DH-3, as well as the latest dredging extent are shown in Figure 7.1. As discussed in Section 2.4.1.6, the dredging area is slightly larger than that shown in the EIA Study Brief and the SSTP in order to achieve the required dredging level. The as-built sampling locations are nonetheless within the latest dredging extent for this EIA Study and are still within the proposed 100m x 100m sampling grid as proposed in the SSTP; these sampling locations are thus considered representative to the proposed dredging extent.

7.6.1.10     Furthermore, due to the sandy and rocky nature of the seabed in the area, core samples could not be collected and only surface grab samples were taken at the 3 sampling locations.

7.6.1.11     In addition, a grab sample was also collected from EPD’s routine marine sediment monitoring station PS6 at Port Shelter on 29 October 2016 as the reference sediment sample.

Chemical and Biological Screening

7.6.1.12     Chemical screening of sediment samples was carried out in accordance with the SSTP. Each sample was tested for chemical screening with parameters as stated in ETWB TCW No. 34/2002.

7.6.1.13     A total of 4 samples had been collected from the sampling locations (including the reference sample at marine sediment monitoring station PS6) and tested for chemical screening. The chemical screening results are attached in Appendix 7.3. Summary of chemical screening results for the 3 samples taken from proposed dredging area is presented in Table 7.2.

7.6.1.14     Based on the chemical screening results, all samples (including the reference sample) were identified as Category L sediment.

Table 7.2 Summary of Chemical Screening Results 

Category

Percentage

No. of Samples

Category L (equal to or below LCEL)

100%

4

Category M (above LCEL but equal to or below UCEL)

0%

0

Category H (above UCEL but equal to or below 10x LCEL )

0%

0

Category H (above 10x LCEL)

0%

0

Total

100%

4

Note:

(1)      Tributyltin (TBT) analysis was only performed for the reference sample but not the sediment samples due to insufficient amount of interstitial water.

7.6.1.15     Since no Category M samples or Category H samples with one or more contaminants exceed 10 times the Lower Chemical Exceedance Level (LCEL) were identified, biological screening was not required in accordance with ETWB TCW No. 34/2002.

Sediment Disposal Options and Quantities

7.6.1.16     Based on the re-sampling and testing results in 2016, the collected sampling within the proposed dredging area is Category L and the corresponding disposal option in accordance with ETWB TCW No. 34/2002 is Type 1 – Open Sea Disposal. However, as discussed in Section 7.6.1.10, only surface grab samples were able to be collected and tested and rocks/hard materials were encountered at deeper depths. As a conservative approach, in case some sediment were indeed encountered at lower depths (i.e. from 0.9m and deeper), findings from the SQR-2007 were assumed in the quantities estimation for these lower depths.  Based on the findings of the SQR-2007 and as shown in Table 7.1, some Type 2 Category H sediment was encountered at the deeper depths. The testing results from each sampling location were used to estimate the quantities of sediment categories within their representative sampling grid (refer to Figure 7.1 for the sampling grid). The estimated quantities from each 3 sampling grid is then summed up to determine the total volume of sediment under each disposal type / sediment category.

7.6.1.17     Based on the above, the total volume of sediment generated is estimated to be approximately 10,875 m3. The estimated quantities for each disposal type are presented in Table 7.3.

Table 7.3 Estimated Quantities of Sediment under each Disposal Option

Disposal Option

Corresponding Category

Estimated In-situ Quantity (1) (m3)

Type 1 – Open Sea Disposal

Category L Sediment

9,740

Type 2 – Confined Marine Disposal

Category H Sediment
(does not require biological screening)

1,135

Total

10,875

Note:

(1)         The quantities shown in the table are estimates only and will be subject to further review during the detailed design and construction stages.

7.6.1.18     The sediment would be disposed of at the designated marine disposal areas according to ETWB TCW No. 34/2002.  The disposal options for the dredged sediment should follow the procedures in ETWB TCW No. 34/2002. The recommended mitigation measures for marine disposal are discussed in Section 7.7.6. No adverse waste management implications are anticipated if the recommended mitigation measures are implemented.

7.6.2               Construction and Demolition Materials

7.6.2.1         C&D materials will be generated from dredging, construction of landing facility and breakwater, improvement works at lookout points and viewing platform and beautification and streetscape improvement works. These C&D materials would largely comprise of inert components, such as soil, artificial hard materials (AHM) (i.e. broken concrete, asphalt, bitumen and granular materials, etc.), and rocks.

7.6.2.2         For dredging works discussed in Section 7.6.1, C&D materials generated will largely comprise of excavated rocks (excluding dredged sediments). For the improvement works at the viewing platform and lookout points, since plain concrete will have to be removed down to required levels before recasting with higher grade concrete, the majority of C&D materials generated will consist of excavated soil and concrete.

7.6.2.3         About 2,890m3 of inert C&D materials will be generated. Minimal non-inert C&D materials, at 470m3, is anticipated and should be properly stored and removed daily. A designated stockpiling area should be assigned to facilitate the sorting of inert and non-inert C&D materials and store the inert C&D materials for subsequent backfilling. About 140m3 of fill materials will be reused for backfilling. The surplus inert C&D materials will be transported to the PFRF for reuse in other project sites. A summary of C&D materials generated during construction phase is shown in Table 7.4.

7.6.2.4         Excavated rock will be sent to Tseung Kwan O Area 137 Fill Bank via barge movements for disposal. Excavated soil and artificial hard material will also be sent to Tseung Kwan O Area 137 Fill Bank, via trucks. The Contractor should liaise with CEDD on the arrangement of and obtain all necessary permits on disposal at the fill bank. Approximately 1 truck trip[2] per week and 3 barge trips[3] are required to transfer the excavated soil and artificial hard material, and rock, respectively, to the fill bank throughout the 43-month period. Non-inert materials, on the other hand, will be disposed of at NENT Landfill, requiring 1 truck trip per day.

7.6.2.5         As the construction works would be conducted in phases, it is expected that the potential environmental impacts arising from the handling and disposal of the inert C&D materials, such as air and odour emissions, noise and potential hazard, could be minimised with the implementation of appropriate measures.

Table 7.4 Summary of C&D Materials Quantities Generated

Works

Construction Period

Quantities of C&D Materials To be Generated (m3)(a)

Inert C&D Material

Non-inert C&D Material(b)

Excavated Soil & Artificial Hard Material(c)

Rock(d)

Landing Facility and Breakwater Construction

Q3 2019 -
Q4 2021

140

1,750

(from dredging)

350

Lookout Points Improvement

Q3 2019 -
Q4 2020

360

-

50

Viewing Platform Improvement

440

-

50

Beautification and Streetscape Works

Q3 2020 -
Q1 2023

200

-

20

Total Generation

1,140

1,750

470

Re-use

140

-

-

Total Volume to be disposed

1,000

1,750

470

Disposal Outlet

Tseung Kwan O Area 137 Fill Bank or other reclamation sites

Tseung Kwan O Area 137 Fill Bank or other reclamation sites

NENT Landfill

Notes:

(a)      All in-situ volume.

(b)      “Non-inert C&D material” includes, but not limited to, bamboo, timber, paper and plastic, etc.

(c)      “Artificial hard materials” includes, but not limited to, broken concrete, asphalt, bitumen and granular materials, etc.

(d)      “Rock” includes all grade rock from the underwater rock excavation activity.

7.6.3               Chemical Waste

7.6.3.1         Chemical waste, as defined under the Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation, includes any substance being scrap material, or unwanted substances specified under Schedule 1 of the Regulation. A complete list of such substances is provided under the Regulation; however, substances likely to be generated from dredging and improvement works would, for the most part, arise from the maintenance of equipment. These may include the following:

·         Used paint, engine oils, hydraulic fluids and waste fuel from plant operation;

·         Spent mineral oils / cleaning fluids from plant maintenance; and

·         Spent solvents / solutions, from equipment maintenance.

7.6.3.2         Chemical waste may pose serious environmental, health and safety hazards if not stored and disposed of in an appropriate manner as outlined in the Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation and the Code of Practice on the Packaging, Labelling and Storage of Chemical Wastes, i.e. posing adverse effects on air, water and land upon spilling and creating fire hazards.

7.6.3.3         It is difficult to quantify the amount of chemical waste that would arise from the construction activities since it would depend on the Contractor’s on-site maintenance requirements and the amount of plant utilised. However, it is anticipated that the quantity of chemical waste, such as lubrication oil and solvent produced from plant maintenance, would be minimal and in the order of few hundred litres per month. The amount of chemical waste to be generated would be quantified in the Waste Management Plan to be prepared by the Contractors. Approximately less than 5 truck trips[4] would be required during the 43-month construction period.

7.6.3.4         With the incorporation of suitable arrangements for storage, handling, transportation and disposal of chemical wastes in accordance with the requirements stated in the Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation and the Code of Practice on the Packaging, Labelling and Storage of Chemical Wastes, adverse environmental (including air and odour emissions, noise and wastewater discharge) and health impacts, and hazards will be negligible.

7.6.4               General Refuse

7.6.4.1         During the construction phase of the Project, the workforce will generate general refuse comprising food waste, waste paper, empty containers, etc. Storage of general refuse may give rise to adverse environmental impacts, such as windblown litter, odour, water and visual impacts, if not properly managed. The site may also attract vermin and pests if the waste containers are not cleaned or maintained properly and frequently. In addition, disposal of waste at sites other than the approved waste disposal facilities may lead to similar adverse environmental impacts to those sites.

7.6.4.2         The maximum number of construction workers is estimated be 80 workers to be presented on-site at any one time during the construction phase of the Project. Based on a generation rate of 0.65 kg per worker per day, the maximum daily arising of general refuse during the construction period would be approximately 52 kg.

7.6.4.3         In order to minimise the final disposal quantities of general refuse, provision of sufficient number of recycling bins for the collection of different types of recyclable waste (including paper, aluminium cans, plastic bottles and glass bottles) and sufficient number of general refuse bins for the collection of non-recyclable waste is recommended. The Contractor should implement an education programme for workers relating to avoiding, reducing, reusing and recycling of general refuse. A reputable licensed collector should be employed to collect the general refuse on a daily basis for disposal at North East New Territories (NENT) Landfill via Kwun Tong Road and Fanling Highway. Given that the quantity of general refuse is small, no adverse impact on the operation of the landfill is anticipated.

7.6.4.4         Mitigation and control requirements for general refuse are detailed in Section 7.7.9. Provided that the handling, storage and disposal of general refuse are in accordance with these requirements, the potential waste management implications, including potential hazards, air and odour emissions, noise and wastewater discharge, associated with handling, storage and disposal of general refuse during the construction phase of the Project are not expected.

7.6.5               Floating Refuse

7.6.5.1         It should be noted that floating refuse within the East of Victoria Harbour is an existing phenomenon. It accounts for 21.1% of the total floating refuse collected by government departments, non-government organisations and other relevant sources from 2010 to 2013[5]. The record of floating refuse collected by Marine Department’s (MD) contractor within the Project area is shown in Table 7.5. Floating refuse tends to accumulate near the coastline as shoreline refuse as they will be drifted by wind and tide, especially in summer, when the wind is blown from the southwest. Besides, the quantity of floating refuse collected was higher in summer months as watercourses and storm water drains carry refuse on land into the sea following heavy rains and typhoons.

7.6.5.2         Base on the Project design, it is not designed to generate any floating refuse; however, in view of the close vicinity of the Project site to the Victoria Harbour, some refuse and debris may be brought from the site into the sea unintentionally upon heavy rains or typhoons. Floating refuse (i.e., food scraps, plastics, waste paper and empty containers etc.) may also be generated by the construction workforce while working along the coastline. Additionally, accidental losses of construction materials and wastes when transporting to and fro the designated sites might occur. Nevertheless, the amount of floating refuse generated from the Project under these events is expected to be limited. Given that with the implementation of the suggested mitigation measures detailed in Section 7.7, the generation and accumulation of floating refuse within the Project area during the construction phase would be minimised.

Table 7.5 Record of Floating Refuse Collected within the Lei Yue Mun Channel

Year

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Total

2014

33.3

31.4

36.4

37.7

41.6

45.8

45.9

43.0

38.8

39.4

36.3

32.7

462.3

2015

33.0

31.0

33.3

36.5

45.8

46.2

45.0

39.9

37.9

32.9

32.5

31.6

445.6

2016

31.2

29.1

32.0

32.9

36.4

42.6

44.1

45.4

37.4

33.6

33.4

31.3

428.4

Source: Marine Department

Notes:

1.       The above quantity represents the floating refuse collected by MD’s contractor.

2.       The above quantity is in units of tonnes.

7.6.5.3         As detailed in Section 7.6.7.1, it is estimated that approximately 2.7m3 of floating refuse will be collected from the newly constructed seawall during each year of construction.

7.6.5.4         Specialised refuse collection vessels currently operate in Victoria Harbour to provide refuse scavenging and collection service under the responsibility of the Pollution Control Unit of MD. During the construction phase, the project proponent’s contractor will be responsible for the collection of any refuse within their works area. With implementation of proper refuse collection practice and the mitigation measures as detailed in Section 7.7, no adverse environmental impact with regard to floating refuse would be anticipated during construction phase, or after completion of the Project.

Operation Phase

7.6.6               General Refuse

7.6.6.1         Under Project operation, it is anticipated that the recreational activities from visitors will result in the generation of a variety of general refuse comprising food waste, waste paper, empty containers etc. that require disposal. However, with the provision of regular and proper treatment and storage managed by suitable waste collectors, the potential of intentional or accidental release to the surrounding environment can be minimised.

7.6.6.2         The amounts of general refuse generation during the operation phase is preliminary estimated based on the visitor population as mentioned in Section 2.4.1.8. It was predicted to receive an additional 7,910 visitors per month upon operation. According to Monitoring of Solid Waste in Hong Kong – Waste Statistics for 2016, 29.3% of the total municipal solid waste (MSW) was commercial waste and the per capita MSW was 1.41kg/person/day. Considering that the waste generated by visitors are commercial waste, the per capital waste generation would be 0.41kg/person/day. Based on the additional number of visitors and the per capita generation of commercial waste, around 107 kg of general refuse would be generated daily during operation. Corresponding to this waste volume and with a loading capacity of about 12 tonnes per refuse collection vehicle (RCV), it can be estimated that up to around 1 vehicle-trip per day would be needed for delivery of the general refuse by RCV to the designated landfill site, which will be via Kwun Tong Road and Fanling Highway. Given this small daily number of vehicle trips, the extra traffic loading on Kwun Tong Road and Fanling Highway would be negligible.

7.6.6.3         As mentioned in Section 7.6.4, general refuse should be stored and managed in a proper manner to avoid the generation of odour nuisance, visual impacts and the potential of attracting vermin and pests. Provision of sufficient quantity of recycling bins and general refuse bins is also necessary to minimise the final disposal quantities of general refuse. With proper implementation of waste management practices, the environmental impact (including potential hazard, air and odour emissions, noise and wastewater discharge) from handling and disposal of general refuse would not be anticipated.

7.6.7               Floating Refuse

7.6.7.1         With reference to the approved Tung Chung New Town Extension EIA (AEIAR-196/2016), it is estimated that 11.5m3 of floating refuse would be collected from the 3.4km long artificial seawall. Considering the total length of the seawall of this Project is 0.8km long, it is anticipated that approximately 2.7m3 of floating refuse would be collected every year. Floating refuse will be collected by regular operation of MD’s contractor.

7.6.7.2         Upon operation, it is expected that the established breakwater at the eastern extent of the development and the increase in water depth would result in a notable tidal flows reduction at the landing area. Floating refuse can be accumulated between the breakwater and the existing shoreline to the west of the landing facility with regard to the reduced flushing. However, unlike typhoon shelters, where usually with narrow entrances, the Project area remains completely open to the main flows in the Lei Yue Mun Narrows and is in close proximity to the main navigation channel. Also, it is expected that there is no increased amount of jetsam entering the landing area in response to the Project operation. As a result, it is anticipated that the semi-enclosed water body upon Project operation would maintain its relatively well flushed property despite the predicted low tidal flow, therefore the problem arises from floating refuse accumulation is considered insignificant.

7.6.8               Dredged Marine Sediments

7.6.8.1         It is anticipated that maintenance dredging will be carried out every 5 to 10 years, subject to review by the Engineer. The estimated quantity of dredged marine sediment is up to 3,056 m3 each time. The extent of dredging area within the project boundary will be subjected to the result of the future bathymetric surveys.

7.6.8.2         The sediment would be disposed of at the designated marine disposal areas according to ETWB TCW No. 34/2002.  The disposal options for the dredged sediment should be determined through sediment sampling and testing works and should follow the procedures in ETWB TCW No. 34/2002. The recommended mitigation measures for marine disposal are discussed in Section 7.7.13. No adverse waste management implications are anticipated if the recommended mitigation measures are implemented.

7.7                  Mitigation of Adverse Environmental Impacts

7.7.1.1         Significant impacts from waste are not predicted, nonetheless, mitigation measures are required to ensure that proper handling, storage, transportation and disposal of material are undertaken. Measures will also be required to ensure that the generation of waste is avoided and minimised where possible and that waste materials are recycled and treated as far as practicable. Recommended mitigation measures for different categories of waste are detailed below.

General

7.7.2               Waste Management Hierarchy

7.7.2.1         The waste management hierarchy has been applied in the assessment and mitigation measures for waste management in evaluation of desirability is shown in the following descending preferences:

·         Avoidance and minimisation of waste generation;

·         Reuse of materials as far as practicable;

·         Recovery and recycling of residual materials where possible; and

·         Treatment and disposal of waste according to relevant laws, guidelines and good practices.

7.7.2.2         Recommendations of good site practices and waste reduction measures should be stated in order to achieve avoidance and minimisation of waste generation in the waste management hierarchy. An Environmental Management Plan (EMP) and trip-ticket system are recommended for monitoring management of waste. Specific measures targeting the mitigation of impacts in works areas and the transportation of waste off-site should be provided to minimise the potential impacts to the surrounding environment.

7.7.3               Good Site Practices

7.7.3.1         Good site practices will be included in the construction contract requirements to be prepared during the detailed design stage of the development by the Contractor. Adverse waste management implications are not expected provided that good site practices are strictly implemented. The following good site practices are recommended during the construction phase:

·         Nomination of an approved person, such as a site manager, to be responsible for good site practices;

·         Training of site personnel in site cleanliness, proper waste management and chemical handling procedures;

·         Provision of sufficient waste disposal points and regular collection of waste for disposal;

·         Adoption of appropriate measures to minimise windblown litter and dust during handling, transportation and disposal of waste; and

·         Preparation of a WMP in accordance with the ETWB TCW No. 19/2005 Environmental Management on Construction Sites and submitted it to the Engineer for approval.

7.7.4               Waste Reduction Measures

7.7.4.1         Amount of waste generation can be significantly reduced through good management and control. Waste reduction is best achieved by proper planning and design at the planning and design phases, as well as by ensuring the implementation of good site practices. The following recommendations are proposed to achieve waste reduction:

·         Segregate and store different types of waste in different containers, skips or stockpiles to enhance reuse or recycling of materials and their proper disposal;

·         Adopt proper storage and site practices to minimise the potential for damage to, and contamination of, construction materials;

·         Plan the delivery and stock of construction materials carefully to minimise the amount of waste generated;

·         Sort out demolition debris and excavated materials from demolition works to recover reusable / recyclable portions (i.e. soil, rock, broken concrete, etc.);

·         Maximise the use of reusable steel formwork to reduce the amount of C&D materials;

·         Minimise over ordering of concrete, mortars and cement grout by doing careful check before ordering; and

·         Adopt pre-cast construction method instead of cast-in-situ method for construction of concrete structure as far as possible.

7.7.5               Storage, Collection and Transportation of Waste

7.7.5.1         Storage of materials on-site may induce adverse environmental impacts if not properly managed. The following recommendations should be implemented to minimise the impacts:

·         Waste, such as soil, should be handled and stored well to ensure secure containment, thus minimising the potential of pollution;

·         Maintain and clean storage areas routinely;

·         Stockpiling area should be provided with covers and water spraying system to prevent materials from being wind-blown or washed away; and

·         Different locations should be designated to stockpile each material to enhance reuse.

 

7.7.5.2         Waste hauler with appropriate permits should be employed by the Contractor for the collection and transportation of waste from works areas to respective disposal outlets. The following recommendation should be implemented to minimise the impacts:

·         Remove waste in timely manner;

·         Employ the trucks with cover or enclosed containers for waste transportation;

·         Obtain relevant waste disposal permits from the appropriate authorities; and

·         Dispose of waste at licensed waste disposal facilities.

Construction Phase

7.7.6               Dredged Marine Sediments

7.7.6.1         The sediment should be dredged, handled, transported and disposed of in a manner that would minimise adverse environmental impacts.

7.7.6.2         Requirements of the Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation, where relevant, shall be adhered to during dredging, transportation and disposal of the sediment.

7.7.6.3         In order to minimise the exposure to contaminated materials, workers shall, if necessary, wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when handling contaminated sediments.  Adequate washing and cleaning facilities shall also be provided on site.

7.7.6.4         For off-site disposal, the basic requirements and procedures specified under ETWB TCW No. 34/2002 shall be followed. Marine Fill Committee (MFC) of CEDD is managing the disposal facilities in Hong Kong for the dredged sediment, while EPD is the authority of issuing marine dumping permit under the Dumping at Sea Ordinance (DASO). The rationale for sediment removal/disposal should be submitted to MFC/CEDD for agreement in accordance with ETWB TCW No. 34/2002.

7.7.6.5         For the purpose of site allocation and application of marine dumping permit, separate SSTP may need to be submitted to EPD for agreement under DASO. Additional SI works, based on the SSTP, may need to be carried out in order to confirm the disposal arrangements of the dredged sediment.  A Sediment Quality Report (SQR), reporting the chemical and biological screening results and the estimated quantities of sediment under different disposal options, may then need to be submitted to EPD for agreement under DASO.

7.7.6.6         To ensure disposal space is allocated for the Project, the Project Proponent should be responsible for obtaining agreement from MFC on the allocation of the disposal site. The contractor(s), on the other hand, should be responsible for the application of the marine dumping permit under DASO from EPD for the sediment disposal.

7.7.6.7         The dredged sediments are expected to be loaded onto the barge and transported to the designated disposal sites allocated by MFC.  The dredged sediment would be disposed of according to its determined disposal options and ETWB TCW No. 34/2002.

7.7.6.8         Stockpiling of contaminated sediments should be avoided as far as possible. If temporary stockpiling of contaminated sediments is necessary, the dredged sediment should be covered by tarpaulin and the area should be placed within earth bunds or sand bags to prevent leachate from entering the ground, nearby drains and surrounding water bodies. The stockpiling areas should be completely paved or covered by linings in order to avoid contamination to underlying soil or groundwater. Separate and clearly defined areas should be provided for stockpiling of contaminated and uncontaminated materials.  Leachate, if any, should be collected and discharged according to the Water Pollution Control Ordinance (WPCO).

7.7.6.9         In order to minimise the potential odour / dust emissions during dredging and transportation of the sediment, the dredged sediments shall be wetted during dredging / material handling and shall be properly covered when placed on trucks or barges. Loading of the dredged sediment to the barge shall be controlled to avoid splashing and overflowing of the sediment slurry to the surrounding water.

7.7.6.10     The barge transporting the sediments to the designated disposal sites shall be equipped with tight fitting seals to prevent leakage and shall not be filled to a level that would cause overflow of materials or laden water during loading or transportation. In addition, monitoring of the barge loading shall be conducted to ensure that loss of material does not take place during transportation. Transport barges or vessels shall be equipped with automatic self-monitoring devices as specified under DASO authority.

7.7.7               Construction and Demolition Materials

7.7.7.1         In order to monitor, document and verify the disposal of C&D materials at landfills and public fill reception facilities, as appropriate, and to control fly tipping, a trip-ticket system in accordance with DEVB TC(W) No. 6/2010 Trip Ticket System for Disposal of Construction and Demolition Materials should be implemented.

7.7.7.2         The C&D materials generated from dredging, lookout points excavation works, and landing facility and carp-shaped platform construction works should be segregated from other waste to avoid contamination and ensure acceptability at the public fill reception facilities or reclamation sites. They should be sorted on-site into inert C&D materials (that is, public fill) and non-inert C&D materials. To minimise the impact resulting from collection and transportation of C&D materials as far as practicable, non-inert C&D materials, such as wood, plastic, steel and other metals should be reused or recycled and, as a last resort, disposed to landfill. A suitable area should be designated within the site for temporary stockpiling of C&D materials and to facilitate the sorting process. Within the stock pile areas, the following measures should be taken to control potential environmental impacts or nuisance:

·         Waste such as soil should be handled and stored well to ensure secure containment;

·         Covering materials during heavy rainfall;

·         Stockpiling area should be provided with covers and water spraying system to prevent materials from wind-blown or being washed away;

·         Locating stockpiles to minimise potential visual impacts; and

·         Minimising land intake of stockpile area as far as possible.

7.7.7.3         The Contractor should be responsible for devising a system to work for on-site sorting of C&D materials. It is recommended that the system should include the identification of the source of generation, estimated quantity of waste generated, arrangement for on-site sorting and / or collection, designated stockpiling areas, frequency of collection by recycling contractors and frequency of removal off-site.

7.7.7.4         All dusty materials should be sprayed with water prior to any loading, unloading or transfer operation so as to maintain the dusty materials wet.

7.7.8               Chemical Waste

7.7.8.1         If chemical waste is produced at the construction site, the Contractor will be required to register with the EPD as a chemical waste producer and to follow the guidelines stated in the Code of Practice on the Packaging, Labelling and Storage of Chemical Wastes. Chemical waste should be stored in appropriate containers and collected by a licensed chemical waste collector. Chemical waste (e.g. spent lubricant oil) should be disposed of at either the CWTC, or another licensed facility, in accordance with the Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation.

7.7.9               General Refuse

7.7.9.1         General refuse should be stored in enclosed bins separately from construction and chemical waste. Recycling bins should also be placed to encourage recycling. Enclosed and covered areas should be provided preferably for general refuse collection and routine cleaning for these areas should also be implemented to keep areas clean. A reputable waste collector should be employed to remove general refuse on a daily basis. It is expected that such arrangements would minimise potential environmental impacts.

7.7.10           Floating Refuse

7.7.10.1     Apart from collecting and storing waste with good waste management practice on site to avoid having waste transported to sea under extreme weather conditions. Contractor for capital dredging should be responsible for the collection of refuse, if any, within the works area. Contractor shall collect and remove floating refuse at regular intervals on a daily basis to keep water within the site boundary and the neighbouring water free from rubbish during the construction phase. In case of floating refuse is identified, a waste collection vessel is needed to remove the floating materials and eventually store and dispose of together with the general refuse, after separating the recyclables for recycling, at North East New Territories Landfill (NENT) via Kwun Tong Road and Fanling Highway.

7.7.10.2     Meanwhile, construction workforce have to be properly educated and adequate general refuse bins should be provided on site to further minimise the potential of contaminating marine environment.

Operation Phase

7.7.11           General Refuse

7.7.11.1     Same mitigation measures as suggested in Section 7.7.9 should be followed.

7.7.12           Floating Refuse

7.7.12.1     Sufficient general refuse and recycling bins should be provided respectively. Meanwhile, the general refuse collection areas should be enclosed and covered properly to avoid potential losses of waste to the adjacent watercourses.

7.7.12.2     Refuse scavenging and collection service will be provided by the Contractor of Marine Department (MD) under existing Contract.

 

7.7.13           Dredged Marine Sediments

7.7.13.1     Same mitigation measures as recommended in Section 7.7.6 should be followed.

7.7.13.2     Table 7.6 provides a summary of the various waste types likely to be generated during the construction works and operation of the Project, together with the recommended handling and disposal methods.


Table 7.6 Summary of Waste Generation, Waste Handling Procedures and Disposal Outlets

Waste Material Type

Generated From

Materials Generated

Total Quantity Generated

Handling Methods/Reuse

Disposal Outlet

Sediments

Construction Phase:
Dredging works within the proposed dredging area to provide sufficient water depth for berthing of vessels as well as constructing the breakwater

Type 1 – Open Sea Disposal (Category L Sediment)

9,740 m3

·       Separate submissions (e.g. SSTP/SQR) to Marine Dumping Section/EPD for dumping permit under DASO

·       Marine disposal at disposal site(s) allocated by MFC

·      Open sea disposal at marine disposal site(s) as determined by MFC.

Type 2 –Confined Marine Disposal (Category H Sediment (does not require the biological screening))

1,135 m3

·         Separate submissions (e.g. SSTP/SQR) to Marine Dumping Section/EPD for dumping permit under DASO

·         Marine disposal at disposal site(s) allocated by MFC

·      Confined marine disposal at marine disposal site(s) as determined by MFC.

Operation Phase:
Maintenance dredging

Marine sediment (types of disposal options to be determined in future sediment sampling and testing works)

3,056 m3 every time

·       Separate submissions (e.g. SSTP/SQR) to Marine Dumping Section/EPD for dumping permit under DASO

·         Marine disposal at disposal site(s) allocated by MFC

·      Marine disposal site(s) as determined by MFC.

C&D Materials

Dredging, Excavation works, Demolition works, Landing facility and platform construction works and Streetscape and beautification works

Inert C&D materials – Excavated Rock

1,750 m3

·       Segregation from non-inert C&D materials

·       Reuse for construction of the landing facility, breakwater and concurrent project

·       Stockpile area (if required) should be well managed with covers and water spraying system

·      Tseung Kwan O Area 137 Fill Bank by barges (3 barge trips in total)

Inert C&D materials – Soil and Artificial Hard Materials, etc.

1,140 m3

Reuse: 140 m3

Disposal: 1,000 m3

·      Tseung Kwan O Area 137 Fill Bank by truck via Wan Po Road (1 truck trip per week)

Non-inert C&D materials – Bamboo, Timber, Papers and Plastics, etc.

470m3

·       Reusable materials should be separated and recycled as far as practicable

·         NENT Landfill by RCV via Kwun Tong Road and Fanling Highway (1 vehicle-trip per day)

General Refuse

Construction Phase: Workforce

Food waste, plastic, aluminium cans, waste paper etc.

Construction Phase:
52 kg/day

·       Provide onsite collection points together with recycling bins

·       Collected by licensed collectors

·      NENT Landfill by RCV via Kwun Tong Road and Fanling Highway (1 vehicle-trip per day)

Operation Phase: Visitors

Operation Phase:
107 kg/day

Chemical Waste

Maintenance and Operation of Equipment and Machineries during Construction Phase

Oils and grease hydraulic fluids, paints, solvents, cleaners etc.

Anticipated as small quantity and in the order of few hundred litres per month

To be quantified in the site Waste Management Plan to be prepared by the Contractor

·       Store in compatible containers in designated area on site

·       To be collected by licensed collectors

·      Chemical Waste Treatment Centre at Tsing Yi via East Kowloon Corridor and Tsing Kwai Highway (<5 vehicle trip in total)

·      Other reception facility that is licensed to receive chemical waste

Floating Refuse

Construction Phase: Workforce

Food waste, plastic, aluminium cans, waste paper etc.

2.7m3 per year

·       Collect and remove floating refuse daily at regular intervals

·       Store and dispose of together with the general refuse

·       Reusable materials should be separated and recycled as far as practicable

Construction Phase:

·      NENT Landfill (to be disposed with general refuse)

Operation Phase: Brought by wind and tide

·         Scavenging and collection by Pollution Control Unit of MD (MD’s contractor)

Operation Phase:

·         Disposal arranged by MD’s contractor


7.8                  Evaluation of Residual Impacts

7.8.1.1          With the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures for the handling, transportation and disposal of the identified waste arising, adverse residual impact is not expected to occur during the construction and operation of the Project.

7.9                  Environmental Monitoring and Audit

Construction Phase

7.9.1.1          It is the Contractor’s responsibility to ensure that all wastes produced during the construction of the Project are handled, stored and disposed of in accordance with the recommended good waste management practices and relevant legislation and waste management guidelines.

7.9.1.2         It is recommended that the waste arisings generated during the construction activities should be audited regularly by the Environmental Team (ET) to determine if wastes are being managed in accordance with approved procedures. The audits should look at all aspects of on-site waste management practices including waste generation, storage, recycling, transport and disposal. Apart from site inspections, documents including licences, permits, disposal and recycling records should be reviewed and audited for compliance with the legislation and Contract requirements. In addition, the routine site inspections should check the implementation of the recommended good site practices and other waste management mitigation measures.

7.9.1.3         A Waste Management Plan (WMP), as part of the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) should be prepared in accordance with ETWB TC(W) No. 19/2005 and submitted to the Engineer for approval. The recommended mitigation measures should form the basis of the WMP. The monitoring and auditing requirement stated in ETWB TC(W) No. 19/2005 should be followed with regard to the management of C&D materials.

Operation Phase

7.9.1.4         It is expected that there would be limited quantities of waste to be generated from the operation of the Project and adverse environmental impacts would not be anticipated with the implementation of good waste management practices. Waste monitoring and audit programme for the operation phase of the Project would not be required.

7.10             Conclusion

Construction Phase

7.10.1.1      The major waste types generated by the construction activities will include C&D materials from dredging, excavation works for the construction of landing facility and breakwaters as well as the improvement works for the viewing platform and lookout points; land-based sediment from dredging; chemical waste from equipment and machineries maintenance; general and floating refuse from workforce. Provided that all these identified wastes are handled, transported and disposed of in strict accordance with the relevant legislative and recommended requirements coupling with proper implementation of the recommended good site practices and mitigation measures, no adverse environmental impact is expected during the construction phase.

7.10.1.2      The total volume of dredged sediment generated from the dredging works is estimated to be approximately 10,875 m3. Based on the results of the chemical and biological screening, approximately 9,740 m3 of sediment is suitable for Type 1 – Open Sea Disposal and 1,135 m3 of sediment requires Type 2 – Confined Marine Disposal with reference to ETWB TCW No. 34/2002. 

7.10.1.3      Mitigation measures, including separate submissions (e.g. SSTP, SQR and the rationale for sediment removal / disposal) to Marine Dumping Section of EPD or MFC/CEDD for agreement under DASO, were recommended and detailed in Section 7.7.6. With the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures and in accordance with the requirements of ETWB TCW No. 34/2002, no adverse environment impacts would be expected from dredging, transportation and disposal of marine sediment.

Operation Phase

7.10.1.4      During the operation phase, the key waste generated will include general refuse and floating refuse from recreational activities. Considering that all these wastes are handled, transported and disposed or in strict accordance with the relevant legislative requirements and the recommended mitigation measures are properly implemented, no adverse environmental impact is expected during the operation phase.

7.10.1.5      Approximately 3,056 m3 marine sediment will be dredged under maintenance dredging every 5 to 10 years. The maintenance dredging would require sediment sampling and testing in accordance with the requirements of ETWB TCW No. 34/2002 for proper disposal of the dredged sediment. With implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, no environmental impact is anticipated.

 



[1] Civil Engineering and Development Department, 3409RO - Lei Yue Mun Waterfront Enhancement Project – Sediment Quality Report, 2007

[2] Assuming material bulk factor of 1.3 for artificial hard material and a construction truck capacity of 7.5m3.

[3] Assuming material bulk factor of 1.3 for rock and a barge capacity of 1000m3.

[4] The estimate is dependent on the actual quantity of chemical waste generated, the Contractor’s Waste Management Plan and the size of the temporary storage area at the Project site.

[5] Inter-departmental Working Group on Clean Shorelines, Investigation on the Sources and Fates of Marine Refuse in Hong Kong, 2015.