CONTENTS

8          Ecological Impact Assessment.. 8-1

8.1            Introduction.. 8-1

8.2            Requirement of EIA under Study Brief.. 8-1

8.3            Relevant Legislation, Standards and Guidelines. 8-1

8.4            Assessment Methodology.. 8-2

8.5            Field Survey Methodology.. 8-8

8.6            Survey Result.. 8-10

8.7            Evaluation of Habitats and Species of Ecological Importance.. 8-17

8.8            Impact Identification and Evaluation.. 8-27

8.9            Mitigation Measures. 8-30

8.10         Cumulative Impact.. 8-33

8.11         Residual Impact.. 8-33

8.12         Monitoring and Audit Requirement.. 8-33

8.13         Conclusion.. 8-33

8.14         References. 8-35

 

TABLES

Table 8.1 Planned Schedule of Ecological Surveys. 8-9

Table 8.2 Estimated Size of the Habitat Types within the Project Area and Study Area. 8-10

Table 8.3 Ecological Evaluation of Secondary Woodland.. 8-17

Table 8.4 Ecological Evaluation of Plantation.. 8-18

Table 8.5 Ecological Evaluation of Shrubland.. 8-19

Table 8.6 Ecological Evaluation of Watercourse. 8-20

Table 8.7 Ecological Evaluation of Developed Area. 8-20

Table 8.8 Ecological Evaluation of Floral Species of Conservation Interest. 8-21

Table 8.9 Ecological Evaluation of Faunal Species of Conservation Interest. 8-22

Table 8.10 Summary of Habitat Loss. 8-27

Table 8.11 Length of Proposed Fresh Water and Salt Water Mains. 8-28

 

 


8                             Ecological Impact Assessment

8.1                       Introduction

8.1.1                  Referring to the Sections 2.5 and 2.6 of this EIA report, the environmental and engineering considerations have been identified and evaluated for Cavern Options 1-4 and Tunnel Options 1-8. The relocation site of Cavern Option 3 and the tunnel portal adjacent to the Lion Rock Park Transit Nursey of Tunnel Option 8 are adopted and formed as the preferred options (Refer to Section 2.7). The ecological impact assessment is assessed and evaluated based on the preferred option.

8.1.2                  This section presents an assessment of potential direct and indirect ecological impacts associated with the construction and operation of the Project. Mitigation measures to avoid, minimise and mitigate the impacts have been recommended.

8.2                       Requirement of EIA under Study Brief

8.2.1                  The EIA Study Brief No.: ESB-317/2019 for the Project issued in June 2019 has stipulated the technical requirements for ecological impact assessment (EcoIA), The aim of the ecological impact assessment is to protect, maintain or rehabilitate the natural environment, in particular, to avoid or minimise impacts on recognised sites of conservation importance and other ecologically sensitive areas. The assessment is intended to identify and quantify as far as possible the potential ecological impacts arising from the construction and operation phases of the Project on the natural environment and its associated wildlife and habitats or species.

8.3                       Relevant Legislation, Standards and Guidelines

8.3.1                  A number of international conventions, local legislation and guidelines provide the framework for the protection of species and habitats of ecological importance. Those related to the Project include:

·         Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap. 170), which protects wild animals listed under the second schedule from being hunted, possession, sale or export, disturbance of their nest or egg without permission by authorized officer

·         Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586), which regulates the import, introduction from the sea, export, re-export, and possession of specimens of a scheduled species, including live, dead, parts or derivatives. The Ordinance applies to all activities involving endangered species which include the parties of traders, tourists and individuals

·         EIAO Guidance Notes NO. 6/2012, 7/2010, 10/2010 and 11/2010. These guidance notes provide the observations on Ecological Assessment from the EIAO perspective, providing the general guidelines for conducting an ecological baseline survey for ecological assessment, introducing some methodologies in conducting terrestrial and freshwater ecological baseline surveys, and methodologies for marine ecological baseline surveys respectively

·         Country Parks Ordinance (Cap. 208) which gives designation to country parks and special areas to protect the vegetation and wildlife for the public enjoyment

·         Forests and Countryside Ordinance (Cap.96) prohibits felling, cutting, burning or destroying of trees and growing plants in forests and plantations on Government land. Related subsidiary Regulations prohibit the selling or possession of listed restricted and protected plant species. The list of protected species in Hong Kong which comes under the Forestry Regulations was last amended on 11 June 1993 under the Forestry (Amendment) Regulation 1993 made under Section 3 of the Forests and Countryside Ordinance.

·         Town Planning Ordinance (Cap. 131) which gives designation to conservation area, green belts, sites of special scientific interest, coastal protection area, and other specified uses to promote conservation, protection and education of the valuable environment

·         Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines Chapter 10 (HKPSG) provides the guidelines on landscape and conservation to achieve a balance between the need for development and the need to minimise disruption of the landscape and natural resources

·         The Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (the Bonn Convention) is an intergovernmental treaty concluded under the aegis of the United Nations Environment Programme concerned with the conservation of wildlife and habitats on a global scale. Its aim is to conserve terrestrial, marine and avian migratory species throughout their range

·         The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is widely recognised as the most comprehensive, objective global approach for evaluating the conservation status of plant and animal species. The goal of the IUCN Red List is to provide information and analyses on the status, trends and threats to species in order to inform and catalyse action for biodiversity conservation

·         Wild Animal Protection Law of the Peoples’ Republic of China (PRC) is formulated for the purpose of protecting and saving the species of wildlife which are rare or near extinction, protecting, developing and rationally utilizing wildlife resources and maintaining ecological balances

8.4                       Assessment Methodology

i.              Study Area

8.4.1                  As stated in Section 3.4.8 of ESB-317/2019, the study area for the purpose of terrestrial ecological impact assessment shall include areas and LRCP within 500 metres distance from the boundary of the Project Area and any associated works as well as any other area likely to be impacted by the Project.

8.4.2                  The ecological impact assessment has been conducted based on the preferred option.

ii.            Literature Review

8.4.3                  The purpose of the literature review is to identify existing information on the habitats and species present in Study Area. The following studies and reports were reviewed to extract relevant information on the flora and fauna present in these areas:

·         Final EIA Report for Shatin to Central Link – Tai Wai to Hung Hom Section (Arup, 2011)

·         Baseline Ecological Survey Report – Relocation of Diamond Hill Fresh Water and Salt Water Service Reservoirs to Caverns – Feasibility Study (Mott MacDonald, 2017)

·         Baseline Ecological Survey and Assessment Report – Relocation of Diamond Hill Fresh Water and Salt Water Service Reservoirs to Caverns – Investigation, Design and Construction – Ecological Survey for Portal Option near Lion Rock Park (AECOM, 2019)

8.4.4                  Relevant literature that have been reviewed include:

·         Hong Kong Biodiversity (AFCD Newsletter)

·         AFCD Unpublished Biodiversity Database (AFCD, 2002 to 2013)

·         Hong Kong Butterfly Inventory (Green Power Hong Kong, 2008 to 2012)

·         Porcupine! (Newsletter of the Department of Ecology and Biodiversity, Hong Kong University)

·         A Field Guide to the Terrestrial Mammals of Hong Kong (Shek, 2006)

·         A Field Guide to the Amphibians of Hong Kong (Chan et al., 2005)

·         Field Guide to the Dragonflies of Hong Kong, 2nd Edition (Wilson, 2004)

·         Field Guide to the Freshwater Fish of Hong Kong (Lee et al., 2004)

·         The Avifauna of Hong Kong (Carey et al., 2001)

·         Freshwater Fish in Hong Kong (Lam, 2002)

·         Hong Kong Bird Report (HKBWS, 2019)

LRCP

8.4.5                  LRCP is one of the three earliest country parks of Hong Kong. Designated on 24 June 1977, it covers a wide upland region set between North Kowloon and Sha Tin. The park borders on Kam Shan Country Park to the west by a boundary line on Tai Po Road, and commands a total area of 557 hectares (AFCD, 2019a). Lion Rock is a narrow mountain range stretching from east to west. The southern slopes are abrupt with thin vegetation. By contrast, the northern slopes are nourished by abundant streams, which in turn give rise to flourishing flora.

8.4.6                  The most common plants in LRCP are Chinese Red Pine (Pinus massoniana), Strawberry Tree (Myrica rubra), Chinese Hackberry (Celtis sinensis), Microcos (Microcos paniculate), Fishpole Bamboo (Phyllostachys aurea), Incense Tree (Aquilaria sinensis), Ivy Tree (Schefflera heptaphylla), Chinese New Year Flower (Enkianthus quinqueflorus) and various Melastoma species. In one particular gap known as Strawberry Tree Pass, Strawberry Trees (Myrica rubra) flourish, while valleys and ravines in the park support great numbers of shrubs and ferns. Dedicated cultivation and maintenance over the decades have transformed these hills into thriving mixed forests of introduced and native species (AFCD, 2019a).

Habitats and Vegetation

8.4.7                  Several habitats identified in the ecological survey for the feasibility study of the current Project (Mott MacDonald, 2017) and ecological survey for portal option near Lion Rock Park (AECOM, 2019) partially overlap with the Study Area of the current Project. The habitats identified by Mott MacDonald (2017) include woodland, shrubland, plantation, stream and developed area. Habitats identified by AECOM (2019) include mixed woodland, plantation, developed area and landscaped area. Both woodland and mixed woodland are identified as secondary woodland for the current Project while the landscaped area identified by AECOM (2019) forms part of the plantation habitat of Lion Rock Park and developed area on the other side of Chuk Yuen Road in the current Project.

Secondary Woodland

8.4.8                  Secondary woodland is found at the western periphery of the Study Area on hill slopes adjacent to Lion Rock Upper Village north of Lion Rock Park and north of Chuk Yuen North Estate and Pang Ching Court. It is found in the northernmost part of the Study Area, above the trail leading to the Reunification Pavilion within the LRCP.  Most parts of this habitat are relatively natural and dominated by native species in the understory, where it supports moderate to high structural complexity with continuous canopy. The top layer of the canopy is occasionally covered by exotic tree species commonly used for tree plantation such as Acacia auriculiformis and Lophostemon confertus while the mid-layer is dominated by native tree species such as Celtis sinensis and Sterculia lanceolate (Mott MacDonald, 2017). Such differential dominance of different canopy layers suggests that at least some part of this habitat was once a tree plantation but has undergone substantial changes of becoming a relatively natural woodland (Mott MacDonald, 2017). The tree canopy consists mostly of semi-mature trees with heights mainly ranges from 12 to 15 m and some mature trees up to about 25 m in height. Signs of human disturbance are evident, particularly at the edges adjacent to roads, footpaths and plantation area where exotic species commonly used for landscape planting are commonly observed. Overall, this habitat supports a moderate to high floristic diversity in the tree, shrub and herbaceous layers with 150 floral species recorded.

8.4.9                  Three floral species of conservation interest were recorded in this habitat including Small Persimmon (Diospyros vaccinioides), Incense Tree (Aquilaria sinensis) and Hong Kong Pavetta (Pavetta hongkongnensis). Diospyros vaccinioides was recorded in the secondary woodland northeast of Ma Chai Hang Fresh Water Service Reservoir (FWSR) and in the shrubland at Sha Tin Pass Road (Mott MacDonald, 2017). Aquilaria sinensis was recorded in the secondary woodland next to Lion Rock Park and Pavetta hongkongnensis was recorded on the hillslope near the northern portal location at Lion Rock Park (AECOM, 2019).

Plantation

8.4.10              Plantation mainly comprises the roadside amenity landscaped areas and vegetated engineered slopes, usually between developed areas and relatively natural hillslopes. It is mainly scattered in the southern half of the Study Area. Within the Study Area, plantation mainly covers the engineered slope north of Chuk Yuen North Estate and Pang Ching Court. This habitat is characterised by high vegetation coverage with some paved maintenance access or footpaths. Vegetation within roadside amenity areas is mostly regularly maintained landscape planting such as lawn, shrubs and tree planting while tree plantation on engineered slopes are mostly semi-mature trees with heights ranging from 10 to 15m with an understorey shrub layer co-dominated by exotic landscape species and self-seeded native species. This habitat supports a moderate to high floristic diversity in the tree and shrub layers with 135 floral species recorded (Mott MacDonald, 2017; AECOM, 2019).

Shrubland

8.4.11              Shrubland is the dominant habitat in the northern and northwestern part of the Study Area. This habitat is dominated by shrubs below 1.5 m with some scattered trees. Rock outcrop is often observed in this habitat, indicating that this habitat is characterised by thin soil which probably limits the development of trees. This habitat supports a moderate to high floristic diversity in the shrub and herbaceous layers with 147 floral species recorded (Mott MacDonald, 2017).

8.4.12              Two floral species of conservation interest, namely Small Persimmon (Diospyros vaccinioides) and Red Azalea (Rhododendron simsii), were recorded in this habitat within the Study Area. Diospyros vaccinioides was observed adjacent to Shatin Pass Road at the edge of the shrubland habitat and Rhododendron simsii was recorded adjacent to the footpath leading to the Lion Rock within the LRCP boundary.

Watercourse

8.4.13              Several stream courses are found within the northern part of the Study Area running from north to south, but most of them were only seasonal with no water flow observed even in wet season (Mott MacDonald, 2017).

8.4.14              The stream courses are largely natural with width of 1.5 to 2.5 m. A mixture of boulders, cobbles and sand is the common substrate in the stream bed of most stream sections, while some short sections are modified with hard paving near some of the confluences or decked over by road structure. For the two stream courses with persistent flow where aquatic fauna survey was conducted, both of them are largely natural with modified sections near Shatin Pass Road.

8.4.15              This habitat supports a low floristic diversity with 29 floral species recorded. Floral species of conservation interest, Diospyros vaccinioides, was recorded in the riparian zone of a stream adjacent to Shatin Pass Road at the northeastern periphery of the Study Area.

Developed Area

8.4.16              Developed area mainly includes urban areas dominated by residential development within the Study Area. A temple and the existing DHSRs, part of which is for leisure recreational use with an urban park setting, are also found in the Study Area. This habitat is characterised by largely paved areas and building structures. Most of the vegetated areas in this habitat are purposively planted and regularly maintained, which include public recreational areas such as playgrounds and roadside amenity planting.

8.4.17              Because of the use of different landscape species for planting in various areas, this habitat supports a high floristic diversity and comprise common species (Mott MacDonald, 2017). No floral species of conservation interest was recorded in this habitat (Mott MacDonald, 2017; AECOM, 2019).

Fauna