Press Releases

Press Releases - 2000

Dumping of mud by CT9 project in compliance with law

In response to media enquiries, a spokesman for the Environmental Protection Department (EPD) said today (September 4) that the contractor of the Container Terminal 9 has obtained a dumping permit from the State Oceanic Administration (SOA) for the disposal of the dredged sediment of the project at the sea near Erzhou Island.

The spokesman said: "The EPD has provided the relevant sediment analysis result to the Mainland authorities for their consideration before they issued the dumping permit."

The Dumping at Sea Ordinance (DASO) was introduced in 1995 for Hong Kong to fulfill its international obligation under the London Convention (the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matters).

Under the Convention, mud transfer between contracting parties for dumping is not prohibited provided that there is previous consent between parties.

In cases where dredged spoil is to be dumped outside Hong Kong waters a permit is required under the DASO for loading of the spoil onto a barge or other vessel.

Before such a permit is issued, the applicant is required to obtain a permit issued by the appropriate authority outside Hong Kong permitting the marine dumping.

In this case, the appropriate authority outside Hong Kong is the SOA and a permit is issued by the EPD to the contractor after it has obtained a permit from the SOA.

The EPD has stringent control on such mud transfer activities.

The spokesman said: "It is always a permit condition that an automatic self-monitoring device is required to be installed on a dumping barge.

"The device can identify any illegal dumping activity within and even beyond Hong Kong waters.

"In addition, the EPD has regular and ad hoc inspections of the sea and construction sites for these activities."

Illegal dumping is an offence and may be subject to a maximum penalty of $200,000 fine and six months' imprisonment on a first conviction and a fine of $500,000 and two years' imprisonment on a subsequent conviction.

End/Monday, September 4, 2000

 

Back to topdot_clear.gifTable of Content