8. ECOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT


8.1 Relevant Legislation, Guidelines and International Conventions


8.1.1 Government legislation and guidelines relevant to the consideration of terrestrial and aquatic ecology under this study include the following:

Forests and Countryside Ordinance (Cap. 96) and its subsidiary legislation the Forestry Regulations;

Town Planning Ordinance (Cap. 131);

Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap. 170);

Country Parks Ordinance (Cap. 208) and associated subsidiary legislation;

Marine Parks Ordinance (Cap. 476) and associated subsidiary legislation; and

Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap. 499) and associated Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process (the "TMEIAP").

8.1.2 The assessment was conducted in accordance with the guidelines provided in the TMEIAP, particularly Annexes 8 and 16.

8.1.3 This study also took note of the following Guidelines:

Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines, Chapter 10 "Conservation";

Guidelines for Implementing the Policy on Off-Site Ecological Mitigation Measures (PELB Technical Circular 1/97, Works Branch Technical Circular 4/97, dated 17 February 1997);

8.1.4 International agreements relevant to this Study include:

Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat (the "Ramsar Convention");

Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (the "Bonn Convention");

Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna ("CITES"); and

The Convention on Biological Diversity.

8.2 Assessment Methodology

8.2.1 A literature review of the terrestrial ecological conditions within the Study Area was conducted. The review included Government and private sector reports, as well as unpublished information, including the following:

Results of biodiversity surveys of Hong Kong flora carried out by University of Hong Kong (Xing et al. 2000, Siu 2000);

Porcupine! (Newsletters of Department of Ecology and Biodiversity, University of Hong Kong) for sightings of flora and fauna;

Ecological surveys performed for the Tai O Sheltered Boat Anchorage EIA (Scott Wilson, 2000); and

Ecological surveys performed for Study on Revitalisation of Tai O (ERM, 2000)

Agreement CE 33/98 Outlying Islands Sewerage Master Plan Stage 2 Review

Hong Kong Breeding Bird Survey 1993-1996, in Avifauna of Hong Kong (Carey et al. 2001)

Egretry Counts in Hong Kong, with particular reference to the Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site - Summer 2001 Report (Wong and Kwok 2000)

8.2.2 Due to the tight programme schedule, ecological surveys at Tai O and Ngong Ping were carried out under the PPFS for the study entitled "Outlying Islands Sewerage Master Plan Stage 2 Review" (namely the "PPFS surveys") to document presence and abundance of terrestrial, freshwater aquatic, and marine/coastal biota. Those surveys covered the Study Area of the current project, covering the period from July 2001 through mid January 2002, thereby covering the wet and early dry seasons. Results of these surveys were reviewed and used for impact assessment of the current project.

8.2.3 According to the study brief, ecological surveys should cover at least nine months and cover the wet and dry seasons. The PPFS surveys covered six months of wet and early dry seasons. Three more months of surveys (from mid-January to mid-April 2002) would be required to fulfil the requirement of the study brief. The same field survey methods specified for the PPFS surveys were employed during the mid-January to mid-April 2002 survey period. Survey results from mid-January to mid-April 2002 were not included and assessed in the Draft Final EIA Report due to the schedule of issuing. Survey results from mid-January to mid-April 2002 were included and assessed in the Final EIA Report. The sampling locations are shown in Drawing No. 23400/EN/062 while the survey schedule is shown inAppendix 8A. The proposed survey methodologies are summarised in the following paragraphs.


Terrestrial Ecological Surveys

8.2.4 Terrestrial ecological surveys were carried out from July 2001 to mid-April 2002, covering both dry and wet seasons, extending some 500m either side of proposed alignment and facilities, in accordance with the EIA Study Brief ESB-074/2001. Results of field surveys performed up to the end of March 2002 were incorporated in this report for impact assessment, while the results of remaining surveys performed in April 2002 (herpetofauna, invertebrates, night surveys, egretry count) are attached in Appendix 8P as supplementary information. Terrestrial Ecological Surveys include:

Habitat and vegetation survey

8.2.5 Habitat maps and the plant species list of the Study Area obtained from the on-going surveys were updated based on ground truthing. Surveys were undertaken on 31 July, 6 and 8 August, 19 October 2001, and 16 January, 25 February, 8 and 20 March 2002. Each representative habitat type was surveyed on foot. Plant species of each habitat type encountered and their relative abundance, with special attention to rare or protected species, were recorded. Photographs of each habitat type were taken. Nomenclature of plant species and their conservation status follows Xing et al. (2000). Habitat maps were digitised using ArcView GIS software.

Mammal survey


8.2.6 The survey area was searched for evidence of mammal activity, in the form of scats, burrows, footprints and other traces. These were plotted onto the habitat plans and investigated in further detail where required. Burrows were examined closely to determine whether they were in current use. Identification of mammal nomenclature follows Reels (1996) and Wilson and Reeder (1992). Surveys were undertaken during the wet seasons on 26 August, 26 and 28 September 2001 and dry seasons on 21 and 25 January, 7 February and 22 March 2002.

Bird survey

8.2.7 The bird surveys were undertaken in all major habitat types using quantitative methods (point counts) and qualitative methods. For the point count method, a total of twenty minutes were spent counting birds at each point. All birds seen or heard within 30 m of each point count location were counted and identified to species where possible. Ornithological nomenclature followed Viney et al. (1996). All bird species seen or heard outside sampling points but within the Study Area were also recorded. Evidence of breeding such as nests, recently fledged juveniles and habitat utilization was recorded. Surveys were undertaken during the wet season on 19, 25 August and 9 September 2001, and during the dry season on 25 November, 1 and 3 December 2001, 19 February, 13 and 22 March 2002.

8.2.8 Due to the tight programme schedule, the combined nine-month ecological surveys (PPFS ecological surveys and the proposed late dry season ecological surveys) from July 2001 to mid-April 2002 will not cover the entire spring bird migration season which are April and May, and breeding season of egrets and herons (April to June). To cover this data gap literature including "Hong Kong Breeding Bird Survey" and "Egretry Counts in Hong Kong" by the Hong Kong Bird Watching Society were reviewed for further information.

Amphibian and reptiles survey

8.2.9 Reptiles and amphibians were recorded by direct observation and active searching in potential concealed locations such as in leaf litter, under stones and logs. Dip-netting was used to survey tadpoles in aquatic habitats such as streams, pools and marshes. Auditory detection of species-specific advertisement calls was used to survey frogs and toads, particularly Romer’s Tree Frog. Surveys were undertaken in the wet season on 26 August, 26 and 28 September 2001 and dry season on 28 February, 7 and 22 March 2002.

Insects (dragonflies, damselflies and butterflies) survey

8.2.10 Dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata) and butterflies (Lepidoptera) were selected as indicator groups, to provide a general assessment of the diversity of invertebrate life associated with the habitats along the survey area.

8.2.11 The abundance of adult butterfly, dragonfly and damselfly fauna was investigated quantitatively (using the point count method) and qualitatively (direct observation/active searching) in all major habitat types within the Study Area. Any butterfly, dragonfly and damselfly seen within 20 m from the points was identified and counted. A total of five minutes was spent counting butterflies, dragonflies and damselflies at each point. Identification of Odonates follows Wilson (1997) and identification of butterflies follows Walthew (1997). Surveys of butterfly, dragonfly and damselfly were undertaken in the wet season on 31 July, 1 and 8 August 2001 and in the dry season on 22 February, 12 and 25 March 2002.

Aquatic Fauna

8.2.12 Freshwater aquatic fauna were investigated through direct observation and active searching, as well as kick sampling and sweep netting. Captured or observed aquatic invertebrates were identified to species or the lowest practicable taxonomic level and counted. During the freshwater fish survey, hook and line and hand-nets were used. Freshwater aquatic fauna surveys were undertaken in wet season on 17 August, 14 and 28 September, 1, 6 and 17 October 2001 and in the dry season on 12 December 2001, 8 and 21 January) and again in 26 February, 25 & 29 March, and 17 April 2002.

8.2.13 Aquatic fauna in Tai O Creek and Tai O Reedbed was sampled by using fine-mesh cast nets and a three-layer gill net in wet (17 October 2001) and dry (25 March 2002) seasons (Drawing No. 23400/EN/062). Ten replicates of cast netting were undertaken at three locations in Tai O Creek. Three-layer gill nets were deployed in Tai O Creek (four locations) and Tai O Reedbed (two replicates, collected during the time with tidal flow). Captured organisms were identified to species or lowest practicable taxonomic level and their sizes were measured.

8.2.14 Animals collected by these methods were identified on site as far as possible and released afterward to minimize disturbance to the natural habitats. Only those that required more detailed examination to confirm their identity were transferred to the laboratory for processing. This involved sorting and identification to the lowest practicable taxonomic level. Each taxon was then counted and diversity indices were calculated.

Night Survey


8.2.15 Night surveys (wet season: 26 August, 26 and 28 September 2001; dry season: 28 February, 7 and 22 March 2002) were undertaken in Ngong Ping, Keung Shan and Tai O, mainly focusing on nocturnal wildlife including mammals and amphibians, as well as Romer's Tree Frog Philautus romeri.

Marine /Coastal Ecological Surveys

8.2.16 Marine /Coastal Ecological Surveys were carried out from July 2001 to mid-April 2002, covering both dry and wet seasons. Results of field surveys, except dry season bentho survey, performed up to the end of March 2002 were incorporated in this report for impact assessment, while the results of remaining surveys performed in April 2002 (dolphins) and dry season bentho survey are summarised in Appendix 8P.

Sublittoral benthos surveys


8.2.17 Grab-samples from 9 locations were taken in Tai O Creek and coastal areas. The 9 locations for benthic ecological sampling are shown on the map in Drawing No. 23400/EN/062. Site H was intended to represent the main inflow/outflow to/from the western channel. Site G is approximately 200 m west of Site H. Site A was approximately 200 m from Site H. Site I was within the proposed sheltered boat anchorage, approximately 350 m further south from Site H and approximately 100m from the seawall.

8.2.18 Three replicates of grab-samples at each of the 9 locations were collected in wet (23 August 2001) and dry (26 February 2002) seasons. Samples were sieved using a 0.5mm sieve. Collected organisms were preserved for identification to the lowest practicable taxonomic level using a binocular dissecting microscope. At least 10% of the sorted and identified samples were re-processed by another specialist for QA/QC.

8.2.19 The species diversity (Shannon-Wiener index H') and evenness values (J') were calculated using the following formula (k is the number of categories and pi is the proportion of the observations found in category i):
k
H' = - å pi log pi
i=1

 

J' = H'/ H'max, in which H'max = log k

 

Natural shore and littoral survey


8.2.20 The coastal habitat types within the Study Area were identified during the surveys. Most of the shoreline within the Study Area was disturbed and modified. The intertidal artificial boulder shore (which was identified as semi-natural shore) located outside the saltpan was surveyed at three tidal-levels, low, mid and high on 1 August, 17 October for wet season and on 12 December 2001, 26 February and 25 March 2002 for dry season. At each tidal level, 5 quadrats (25 x 25 cm) were placed randomly to assess the abundance and distribution of flora and fauna. All animals found in each quadrate were identified and recorded to species level so that density (No./m2) could be determined. The species diversity and evenness (J') were calculated using the above formulae.

8.2.21 All suitable shores were surveyed for horseshoe crabs on 1 August, 17 October for wet season and on 12 December 2001, 26 February and 25 March 2002 for dry season. Surveys attempted to locate both adults and juveniles and were conducted by walking along the shoreline. Surveys covered all of the muddy and sandy shores and focussed on areas where local fisherman have observed horseshoe crabs. Any horseshoe crabs encountered were identified to species, counted and their location recorded.

8.2.22 Tai O Creek and estuary support extensive stands of mangroves of at least 5 species. Mangrove surveys were conducted on 1 August and 17 October 2001. Further mangrove surveys have been undertaken to identify the location and condition of mangrove stands. The density, average height and community structure, as well as the dominance, of the mangrove recorded within the Study Area was measured. Each patch was photographed and described qualitatively.


Dolphin Survey


8.2.23 Land-based visual surveys were conducted to estimate dolphin use of Tai O Bay and nearby offshore waters. Eight surveys were scheduled, four in the morning and four in the afternoon in wet and dry seasons; each survey covered at least 4 hours. The observation point is located at the ferry pier near Shek Tsai Po. Dolphin surveys were conducted on 7 September, 28 October, 15 November 2001, 16 January, 28 February, 7 and 25 March 2002. The last survey was conducted before mid-April 2002.


8.2.24 The locations of dolphin sightings were recorded on topographic maps. Number of dolphins, age class, distance from observers, and direction of travel were recorded on data sheets, together with remarks on behaviour. Sea state (measured on the Beaufort Scale), weather and visibility were recorded.


8.3 Baseline Ecological Conditions


Site of Conservation Importance

Lantau North and South Country Parks

8.3.1 Lantau North and South Country Parks were designated in 1978. They occupy a total area of about 7800 ha and cover most of Lantau Island. Ngong Ping Road within the Study Area lies on the southern boundary of Lantau North Country Park, while Kwun Yam Shan, Tai Fung Ngau and Muk Yue Shan on the southern part of the Study Area fall into Lantau South Country Park (Drawing No. 23400/EN/063). Lantau North and South Country Park encompasses a wide range of terrestrial habitats, from grassland to some of the finest forest in Hong Kong supporting a wide range of fauna such as insects, reptiles and a variety of birds.

 

Lantau Peak Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and Special Area

8.3.2 Lantau Peak SSSI and Special Area overlap in area and are located within Lantau South Country Park (Drawing No. 23400/EN/063). Lantau Peak Special Area, designated in 1980, has an area of 116 ha. Lantau Peak SSSI, with an area of about 227.5 ha, was also designated in 1980 due to the high species richness of the "scrub-forest" and the presence of rare plant species including Exbucklandia spp., Magnolia spp., Manglietia spp. and Illicium spp.

Ngong Ping Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI)


8.3.3 Ngong Ping SSSI (Drawing No. 23400/EN/063) was designated in 1999 and has an area of approximately 14 ha, including part of Ngong Ping Stream and forested areas. It was a former tea plantation area and is of special scientific interest due to the presence and the confirmed breeding of the locally rare Romer's Tree Frog (Philautus romeri). The Ngong Ping valley was confirmed to support the largest population of the endemic Romer's Tree Frog.

Man Cheung Po Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI)

8.3.4 Man Cheung Po SSSI consists of the riverine habitat below Man Cheung Po including the Ng Yuen Garden of approximately 29.2 ha (Drawing No. 23400/EN/063). Man Cheung Po SSSI was designated in 1980 mainly due to the presence of the orchids and Ternstroemia pseudoverticillata. Man Cheung Po SSSI is located beside the boundary of the Study Area.

 

Terrestrial Habitat/Vegetation

Literature Review


8.3.5 Reviewing the results of biodiversity surveys of Hong Kong flora (Xing et al. 2000), there were 33 rare or very rare plant species recorded at "Lantau Peak" (mostly at montane forest or streamside habitat, Appendix 8B), which presumably is within or near the Lantau Peak SSSI. A total of 5 and 3 rare plant species were also recorded at "Tai O" and Ngong Ping" respectively (ibid.).

Survey Results


8.3.6 The field surveys identified that the Study Area is covered by a variety of terrestrial habitats including plantation, woodland, grass-shrubland, cultivated land, mangrove/marsh, fish pond, stream and urbanized areas. Plantation, woodland and grass-shrubland were the dominant habitat type recorded within the Study Area. Table 8.1 lists the area of each habitat type recorded within the Study Area.

Table 8.1 Habitat types recorded within the Study Area.

Habitat type

Area (ha)

No. of plant species recorded

Plantation

188.0

174

Woodland

132.2

161

Grass-Shrubland

338.9

140

Cultivated Land

15.5

83

Mangrove/Marsh

16.2

55

Fish Pond

16.7

29

Stream

15.2

Not applicable (refer to Section 8.3.20)

Urbanised Area

68.8

94

Coastline

About 400m in length

Not applicable

 

8.3.7 The Study Area and the locations of various habitat types are shown on Drawing No. 23400/EN/064 and photographic records of representative habitat types are shown on Drawing No. 23400/EN/065a&b. Species list of flora is given in Appendix 8C.

Plantation

8.3.8 A substantial portion of the Study Area was covered by plantation including Ngong Ping SSSI, the Buddha, along roads and hillside of Tai O and within Lantau South Country Park.

8.3.9 Ngong Ping SSSI was a former tea plantation area. Camellia sinensis as well as other planted trees including Acacia confusa were commonly found in this area during the surveys (Drawing No. 23400/EN/066). Understorey developed after abandonment of the tea plantation and was fairly high in species richness. Various native species including Symplocos lancifolia, Schefflera octophylla and Ilex asprella were found in the undergrowth. The genus Camellia is protected under Forestry Regulations. The presence of abundant fruiting and seedlings of Camellia sinensis suggests that this species has adapted to the local site conditions and is capable of colonising the area. In addition to Camellia sinensis, one tree species of restricted distribution in Hong Kong (Xing et al. 2000), Celtis timorensis, was also recorded.

8.3.10 Plantations in the remaining areas mainly comprise exotic species. The most common trees planted were Acacia confusa, Lophostemon conferta and Casuarina equisetifolia. Plantation on hillslopes and roadside mostly formed a pure, dense stand with little undergrowth. Plantation surrounding the Buddha at Ngong Ping included a variety of landscaping species and fruit trees.


Woodland

8.3.11 Young secondary woodland was mainly found at Tai O and Keung Shan. The open canopy had a height of 8 - 10 m and was dominated by Machilus chekiangensis, Pinus massoniana, Mallotus paniculatus, Rhus succedanea, and Sapium discolor. The understorey was densely vegetated and was composed of a variety of tree, shrub and herb species, including Acronychia pedunculata, Alangium chinense, Psychotria rubra, and Litsea rotundifolia.

8.3.12 Woodland was recorded mainly in ravines and adjacent to grassy or shrubby hillsides in the presence of shelter and water. The woodland had similar composition to the surrounding shrubland but with proportionally more tree species including Schefflera octophylla, Sterculia lanceolata, and Ficus hispida. The woodland could be considered as young and had moderate diversity. One tree species, Aquilaria sinensis, commonly found locally but is listed as a Category III nationally protected species in China and listed as vulnerable in the China Plant Red Data Book, was also recorded in the plantation and woodland habitats within the study area. Other than that, rare or protected plants were not recorded in the woodland habitat during the survey.

Grass-Shrubland

8.3.13 Grass-shrubland was mainly located on hillsides of higher elevation. Grass-shrublands were of various heights, ranging from 0.5m to 2m, dominated by Blechnum orientale, Rhodomyrtus tomentosa, Baeckea frutescens, Lepidosperma chinense, and Dicranopteris linearis. Grasses including Ischaemum spp., Eulalia speciosa, Cymbopogon sp., and Eragrostis sp. were also abundant in grass-shrubland of younger age at lower elevations. Grass-shrubland was considered to have moderate diversity, and was subject to fire disturbance. Some grass patches were also planted with exotic species including Acacia confusa and Lophostemon conferta along trails and paths.

8.3.14 Two orchid species, Arundina graminifolia and Spathoglottis pubescens, were recorded on grassy cut slopes of Ngong Ping Road (Drawing No. 23400/EN/066), with approximately 10 and 6 individuals of Arundina graminifolia and Spathoglottis pubescens recorded respectively. The orchid family (Orchidaceae) is protected under Forestry Regulations. These two species however are commonly found in grassland in Hong Kong (Siu 2000). The Chinese New Year Flower Enkianthus quinqueflorus and Farrer's Azalea Rhododendron farrerae were recorded on the hillside in the vicinity of the proposed pumping station (Drawing No. 23400/EN/066). Both shrub species are protected under Forestry Regulations although they are commonly found in shrubland habitats in Hong Kong (Xing et al. 2000).

Cultivated Land

8.3.15 All the formerly cultivated lands recorded within the Study Area had been abandoned. The plant species of the cultivated lands consisted of pioneer trees including Mallotus paniculatus, Sapium sebiferum, remnants of crops and fruit trees including Musa paradisiaca, Citrus maxima, Psidium guajava, and weedy species including Mikania micrantha, Lantana camara and Bidens pilosa. Some abandoned cultivated lands were flooded by streams during the wet season survey, and marshy vegetation had colonised those areas. The marshy vegetation included Isachne globosa, Wedelia chinensis, Eriocaulon sp., Cyclosorus interruptus and Impatiens chinensis. Neither rare nor protected plants were recorded during the survey.

Mangroves/Marsh

8.3.16 Mangroves/Marsh occurred mainly at abandoned fish ponds, disused saltpans and riparian zones of Tai O Creek, all of which were subject to tidal influence. Scott Wilson (2000) undertook a detailed study of distribution and composition of mangroves at Tai O. Comparison of habitat map and field surveys showed that this habitat has changed little since 1999. Therefore, their results were combined with the current findings for discussion here. Since mangroves and reeds were intermingled, the two habitats are collectively classified and described as Mangroves/Marsh in this study. Major mangrove stands, however, have been shown separately on the habitat map.

8.3.17 Six out of eight mangrove species occurring in Hong Kong were found in this habitat. These included Kandelia candel, Bruguiera gymnorhiza, Avicennia marina, Aegiceras corniculatum, Excoecaria agallocha, and Acanthus ilicifolius. Mangrove associates including Acrostichum aureum, Hibiscus tiliaceus and Clerodendrum inerme as well as the reed Phragmites australis were commonly found in the mangrove stands. The absence of a real intertidal zone and the steep gradients of saltpan bunds and fish pond bunds probably result in the dominance of pioneer mangrove species (Kandelia candel and Avicennia marina) and backshore mangrove associates, and poor representation of middle zone mangrove species (e.g. Bruguiera gymnorhiza) (Scott Wilson 2000).

8.3.18 The Tai O reedbed identified in Dudgeon and Chan (1996) is also included in this habitat. This is one of the largest Phragmites australis beds in Hong Kong (ibid.). Mangrove and mangrove associate species were commonly found in the reedbed.

Fish Pond

8.3.19 Fish ponds were found only at Tai O. All of them were abandoned or had not been recently managed, although fish nets were seen in some of these ponds and were presumably used for fish harvest. Grassy pond bunds were planted with trees including Dimocarpus longan and Melia azedarach. Due to the proximity to the coast and connection with tidal water, pond bunds were colonised by mangroves, mangrove associates and reeds, including Kandelia candel, Acrostichum aureum and Phragmites australis. Given time, and in the absence of management, the pond bunds will gradually degenerate and the water levels will drop. More mangroves and reeds will occupy the pond surface and the fish ponds will then be naturally restored to mangrove/marsh habitats.

Stream


8.3.20 Perennial streams were mainly located at Tai O (Tai O Creek), Keung Shan, and Ngong Ping. There are two major natural drainage systems in the Study Area, Sham Wat and Tai O catchment. The streams in Ngong Ping and near Sze Tse Tau Shan belong to the Sham Wat catchment. They eventually join and flow into the sea at the outlet in Sham Wat Wan. Tai O main stream collects all the flows from streams in Keung Shan and Ngau Kwo Tin and then drains into the sea through Tai O Creek. The upper reaches of most of these streams were natural and surrounded by woodland habitat, while the middle and lower reaches near villages or roads were subject to a certain degree of channelisation or bank reinforcement. The lower reach of the stream (upper reach of Tai O Creek) was subject to tidal influence and mangroves and mangrove associates had colonized the earthen bank. As a result, there is no real riparian zone for these streams. The plant species recorded along the stream habitat can be referenced to the plant lists for woodland and mangrove/marsh habitats (Appendix 8C).


Urbanised Area


8.3.21 This habitat includes all the roads, houses, temples and wastelands. The proposed pumping station at Ngong Ping is located on wasteland, which is also identified as urbanised area. Species recorded included some plantation species, mainly Acacia confusa, and weeds such as Lantana camara and Mikania micrantha. Neither rare nor protected plants were recorded during the survey. This habitat is of limited ecological value.

Coastline


8.3.22 Most of the shoreline within the Study Area was considered to be disturbed and modified. It was largely composed of boulders and was void of vegetation.

Animal Wildlife

Avifauna

Literature Review


8.3.23 A total of 48 bird species (Appendix 8D) were recorded at and near the Study Area during the Hong Kong Breeding Bird Survey between 1993 and 1996 (Carey et al. 2001). Surveys were carried out between March and August in each year, and covered spring migration and breeding seasons. Twelve species were identified as breeding species and most are common in Hong Kong (e.g., White-breasted Waterhen Amaurornis phoenicurus, Chinese Bulbul Pycnonotus sinensis). Nine of the 12 breeding species were recorded at or near Tai O and the other three usually nest in shrublands and forests.

8.3.24 Bird species of interest recorded at and near the Study Area during the Hong Kong Breeding Bird Survey included some raptor species listed in Appendix II of CITES and Class 2 protected wildlife of national importance in China (Black-eared Kite Milvus lineatus, White-bellied Sea Eagle Haliaeetus leucogaster, Crested Goshawk Accipiter trivirgatus, Bonelli's Eagle Hieraaetus fasciatus and Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus) (Xu 1995, Zheng and Wang 1998). The White-bellied Sea Eagle is primarily maritime (Viney et al. 1996) and is only recorded in Hong Kong and nowhere else in China since the 1950's (Zheng and Wang 1998). The Black-eared Kite and Peregrine Falcon can be found in many types of habitats (Viney et al. 1996). The Crested Goshawk and Bonelli's Eagle are inhabitants of forest (ibid.). These two species together with the Peregrine Falcon are listed as "rare" in the China Red Data Book (Zheng and Wang 1998).

8.3.25 Bird species of interest recorded within and near the Study Area during the Hong Kong Breeding Bird Survey included some species listed in Class 2 protected wildlife of national importance in China (Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis, Lesser Coucal Centropus bengalensis and Hwamei Garrulax canorus) (Zheng and Wang 1998). The Greater Coucal and Lesser Coucal are listed as "vulnerable" in the China Red Data Book (Zheng and Wang 1998).

8.3.26 Other bird species of interest recorded at and near the Study Area during the Hong Kong Breeding Bird Survey included the rare/uncommon resident species the Emerald Dove Chalcophaps indica, Oriental Skylark Alauda gulgula, Upland Pipit Anthus sylvanus, Black-throated Laughingthrush Garrulax chinensis and Red-billed Leiothrix Leiothrix lutea, and two rare/uncommon migrant species, the Red-winged Crested Cuckoo Clamator coromandus and Hainan Blue Flycatcher Cyornis hainana. The Oriental Skylark is mainly found in open areas with short grass and Upland Pipit mainly in grassy upland habitats (Carey et al. 2001). The others are mainly found in tall shrubland and forests (ibid.).

8.3.27 In addition to the Hong Kong Breeding Bird Survey, there were some records of avifauna at Tai O and Ngong Ping. Bird species of interest at Tai O included the rare/uncommon mangroves/marsh associated species (Reef Egret Egretta sacra, Purple Heron Ardea purpurea, Yellow Bittern Ixobrychus sinensis, Chestnut Bittern Ixobrychus cinnamomeus, Schrenck's Bittern Ixobrychus eurhythmus, Banded Rail Rallus striatus, Pheasant-tailed Jacana Hydrophasianus chirurgus) and rare/uncommon migrant species (Brambling Fringilla montifringilla, Black-browed Reed Warbler Acrocephalus bistrigiceps, Brown Shrike Lanius cristatus, Yellow-breasted Bunting Emberiza aureola) (Carey 1996, 1998, Green Lantau Association et al. 1998, Carey and Tai 1999, Scott Wilson 2000). Reef Egret, Black-eared Kite and Lesser Coucal are listed as Class 2 protected wildlife of national importance in China (Zheng and Wang 1998). White-shouldered Starling Sturnus sinensis, a rare resident, was also regularly reported at Tai O (Carey 1996, 1998, Carey and Tai 1999).

8.3.28 Other recorded avian species of conservation interest at Tai O included the rare Greater Crested Tern Sterna bergii, Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida, White-winged Black Tern Chlidonias leucoptera and Common Tern Sterna hirundo. These tern species are primarily maritime.

8.3.29 A small night roost of the Black-eared Kite was reported in Tai O in 1995 (Carey 1996). The maximum count in 1995 was 31 birds (Oct - Dec 1995). The roost was also surveyed in 1996, with maximum count of 37 birds (Jan 96) (Carey 1998). There was no report of the roost in Hong Kong of the Black-eared Kite which is listed in Appendix II of CITES and is a Class 2 protected species of national importance in China (Xu 1995, Zheng and Wang 1998).

8.3.30 Bird species of interest at Ngong Ping included some rare/uncommon migrants i.e. the Brown Thrush Turdus chrysolaus, Mountain bush Warbler Cettia fortipes, Mugimaki Flycatcher Ficedula mugimaki, Brown Shrike, Tristram's Bunting Emberiza tristrami and Bonelli's Eagle (Carey 1996, 1998, Carey and Tai 1999). All are inhabitants of shrublands or forests (Viney et al. 1996). Bonelli's Eagle is listed in Appendix II of CITES and is a Class 2 protected animal of national importance in China (Zheng and Wang 1998). This species is mainly found in lightly wooded hillsides (Carey et al. 2001).

8.3.31 The Tai O egretry is located on a hillside plantation on the northeast slope of Fu Shan in Tai O (Drawing No. 23400/EN/060). Nesting pairs were recorded in 1995, 1999, 2000 and 2001 (Young and Cha 1995, Wong et al. 2000, Kwok et al. 2001, Wong and Kwok 2002), and Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus, Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax and Little Egret Egretta garzetta were recorded breeding (Table 8.2). The nesting population at the Tai O egretry never comprised more than 3% of the total Hong Kong breeding population. However, this is the only nesting colony reported on Lantau Island to date. According to the local people, this egretry has existed since 1988, and before that nests were built on mangroves (mainly Kandelia candel and Acanthus ilicifolius) to the north of the Tai O egretry. Nesting ardeids in Tai O egretry on average flew for 440 (high tide) to 480 m (low tide) to feed, and mainly foraged on abandoned fishponds and mangroves/marsh on the east of the colony (Kwok and Dahmer, 2002).

Table 8.2 Total numbers of nesting birds at Tai O egretry (Young and Cha 1995, Wong et al. 2000, Kwok et al. 2001, Wong and Kwok 2002)

Year

Chinese Pond Heron

Little Egret

Night Heron

Total

% of total nests in Hong Kong

1995

10

20

3

33

2.5

1999

1

8

13

22

2.7

2000

1

5

0

6

0.8

2001

0

12

7

19

2.3

 

Survey Results


8.3.32 A total of 60 bird species were recorded within the Study Area, 40 species were recorded at sampling points in the Study Area (Appendix 8E) and 20 additional species were recorded outside sampling points but within the Study Area (Appendix 8F). Relative abundance and species richness in each type of surveyed habitat, based on the results of the point count method, are presented in Table 8.3. Both bird abundance and species richness recorded were highest in mangroves while lowest in grass-shrubland. Grassland habitats are generally low in diversity of avifauna (Dudgeon and Corlett 1994, Kwok and Dahmer, in press).

Table 8.3 Abundance and species richness of birds recorded within the Study Area in wet and dry season surveys

Habitats

Density

(individuals ha-1)

Species richness

(mean no. of species per sampling point)

Total area surveyed (ha)

Total no. of species recorded

Cultivated lands

7.1

1.5

0.565

7

Mangroves/ Marsh

15.9

2.9

1.130

17

Plantation

9.6

1.0

1.978

15

Stream

4.3

1.2

0.848

7

Woodland

9.4

1.9

1.130

11

Grass-shrubland

3.8

0.3

1.413

5

Fish pond

15.3

2.0

0.565

13

Urbanized area

9.4

0.8

0.565

7

 

8.3.33 The recorded species are mostly common in Hong Kong (e.g., Common Tailorbird Orthotomus sutorius, Crested Myna Acridotheres cristatellus and Tree Sparrow Passer montanus). However, some rare/protected species were also recorded during the surveys. These included Reef Egret, Black-eared Kite, Crested Serpent Eagle Spilornis cheela, White-bellied Sea Eagle, Buzzard Buteo buteo, Greater Coucal, Lesser Coucal, Chestnut Bulbul Hemixos castanonotus, White's Thrush Zoothera dauma and Hwamei.

8.3.34 Buzzard, Greater Coucal, Lesser Coucal, Black-eared Kite and Hwamei are widely distributed in Hong Kong but are regarded as species of ecological interest. Reef Egrets are mainly found in coastal areas. Crested Serpent Eagle, Buzzard, White-bellied Sea Eagle, Greater Coucal, Reef Egret, Black-eared Kite and Lesser Coucal are listed as Class 2 protected animals of national importance in China (Zheng and Wang 1998). Crested Serpent Eagle, Buzzard, White-bellied Sea Eagle, Black Kite and Hwamei are listed in Appendix II of CITES (ibid.). Crested Serpent Eagle, Greater Coucal, Lesser Coucal and Reef Egret are also listed as "vulnerable" and "rare" in China Red Data Book.

8.3.35 Two rare species were recorded in the Study Area during the surveys. These were the Chestnut Bulbul and White's Thrush. Chestnut Bulbul is mainly found in old forests while White's Thrush can be found in many types of terrestrial habitats (Carey et al., 2001).

8.3.36 Ardeids (e.g., Grey Heron Ardea cinerea, Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus and Little Egret Egretta garzetta) are of conservation concern, despite of their commonness in Hong Kong. Breeding populations of Little Egrets and Chinese Pond Heron have declined gradually, and this may be due to reduction in wetland habitats in Hong Kong (Carey et al., 2001, Lansdown et al. 2000).

8.3.37 Five species were observed breeding within the Study Area (Table 8.4). All five species are common and widespread in Hong Kong (e.g., Magpie Robin Copsychus saularis, Great Tit Parus major).

Table 8.4 Bird species showing breeding behaviours within the Study Area

Common names

Habitat Type Recorded

Observation

Crested Myna

Plantation, abandoned pond, grassland, mangroves and urbanized area

Carrying nesting materials in mangroves at Tai O

Black-necked Starling

Abandoned ponds, mangroves and urbanized area

Carrying nesting materials in urbanized area at Tai O

Great Tit

Mangrove, abandoned cultivated land, woodland and plantation

Recently-fledged juvenile has been recorded in plantation at Ngong Ping

Chinese Bulbul

Abandoned cultivated land, , mangroves, woodland, plantation, stream, urbanized area and grassland

Recently-fledged juvenile has been recorded in mangrove at Tai O

Magpie Robin

Abandoned cultivated land, mangroves, grassland, stream, urbanised area, woodland and plantation

Recently-fledged juvenile has been recorded in mangrove at Tai O

 

Amphibian/Reptile

Literature Review

8.3.38 There were two amphibian species of ecological interest, the Leaf Litter Toad Leptolalax pelodytoides and Rough-skinned Floating Frog Occidozyga lima, recorded within or close to the Study Area (Appendix 8G). The Leaf Litter Toad is a fairly restricted and uncommon species in Hong Kong and has been reported in the hill streams near Ngong Ping (Lau and Dudgeon 1999). In Hong Kong, the Rough-skinned Floating Frog has declined drastically in recent years and is now only known in the marsh and wet cultivated fields at Tai O Leung Uk (ibid.).

8.3.39 A number of restricted and/or uncommon reptiles have also been recorded in the Study Area (Appendix 8G), including Chinese Forest Skink Ateuchosaurus chinensis, found in a plantation on Tai O Island; Dark Forest Skink Scincella modesta, reported from Keung Shan (Lazell 1996); Rufous Burrowing Snake Achalinus rufescens, found in the plantation, tall shrubland and forest at Ngong Ping; Buff-striped Keelback Amphiesma stolatum, found in a stream at Ngong Ping and in the Keung Shan catchwater tunnel; Mangrove Water Snake Enhydris bennettii, found near the mangrove at Tai O (Karsen et al. 1998); Golden Kukri Snake Oligodon cinereus, recorded from the grassland near Nei Lak Shan; and Coral Snake Calliophis macclellandi, recorded from Keung Shan catchwater. A Natricinae snake that is probably new to science and might represent an undescribed genus was recently found in the Keung Shan catchwater (Kolby and Lazell 2001).

8.3.40 There are some other regionally or globally threatened reptiles including Reeves' Terrapin Chinemys reevesii, Burmese Python Python molurus, Copperhead Racer Elaphe radiata and Many-banded Krait Bungarus multicinctus, that have been recorded in the Study Area (Appendix 8G). Reeves' Terrapin, listed as "endangered" in the IUCN 2000 Red List, was found in a seasonal stream at Ngong Ping and in the wet cultivated fields at Tai O Leung Uk. Burmese Python (CITES Appendix II and China Red Data Book "critically endangered") was recorded in the Keung Shan catchwater. Copperhead Racer, listed as "endangered" in China Red Data Book (Zhao 1998), was found in the Keung Shan catchwater and in grassland at Ngong Ping. Many-banded Krait, listed as "vulnerable" in the China Red Data Book (ibid.), has been recorded from Tai O (Romer 1961). These records are summarized in Appendix 8G.

Survey Results


8.3.41 A total of nine species of amphibian were recorded during the surveys within the Study Area. Their distribution and relative abundance in different sites are shown in Appendix 8H. Among the recorded species, Romer's Tree Frog is an endemic species and is protected under the Wild Animals Protected Ordinance (Karsen et al., 1998) (Drawing No. 23400/EN/066, Drawing No. 23400/EN/067). Many tadpoles of this species were found in the seasonal streams at Ngong Ping. Indeed Ngong Ping is known to support the largest population of this endemic frog (Lau 1998) and has been designated as a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). Another probable endemic species, Short-legged Toad Megophrys brachykolos (Zhao and Adler 1993), was heard calling in the streams near Keung Shan. The other seven species of frog and toad (Asian common Toad Bufo melanostictus, Gunther's Frog Rana guentheri, Green Cascade Frog Rana livida, Three-striped Grass Frog Rana macrodactyla, Brown Tree Frog Polypedates megacephalus, Asiatic Pained Frog Kaloula pulchra and Ornate Pigmy Frog Microhyla ornata are common to abundant and are widespread locally (Karsen et al. 1998).

8.3.42 Six species of lizard and seven species of snake were recorded (Appendix 8H). Two species, Common Rat Snake Ptyas mucosus and Chinese Cobra Naja atra, are listed on CITES Appendix II and both of them were recorded in Keung Shan and Ngau Kwo Tin respectively. The Common Rat Snake is regarded as "endangered" while the Chinese Cobra is classified as "vulnerable" according to the China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals (Zhao 1998). The Indo-Chinese Rat Snake Ptyas korros is also listed as "endangered" in the China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals (ibid.), and it was recorded in the Keung Shan catchwater. All three species, however, are common and widespread in Hong Kong (Karsen et al. 1998). All recorded lizards (Chinese Gecko Gekko chinensis, Bowring's Gecko Hemidactylus bowringii, Changeable Lizard Calotes versicolor, Long-tailed Skink Mabuya longicaudata, Scincella reevesii and Chinese Waterside Skink Tropidophorus sinicus) are widespread and common to abundant in Hong Kong (Karsen et al. 1998). The remaining four snakes (Chinese Water Snake Enhydris chinensis, White-spotted Slug Snake Pareas margaritophorus, Red-necked Keelback Rhabdophis subminiatus and Checkered Keelback Xenochrophis piscator) are locally common and widespread (Karsen et al. 1998).

Mammals

Literature Review


8.3.43 There were 7 sightings of Chinese White Dolphins Sousa chinensis (individuals or groups) at Tai O Bay in March and April 1999 (Ecosystems Ltd 1999). Interviewed fishermen in Tai O reported that dolphins seldom enter Tai O Bay (ibid.). Recreational anglers reported regular sightings of dolphins in outer Tai O Bay. One resident in Tai O reported that dolphins enter the bay primarily during the sea-bass season (autumn), and they have been known to penetrate the bay as far as the 500 m from the saltpans (ibid.).

8.3.44 There are few records of terrestrial mammals from the Study Area (Table 8.5) (Appendix 8G). Among the eleven recorded species, some of them are of conservation concern, including Barking Deer Muntiacus sp., Ryukyus Mouse and a number of bat species. The Barking Deer, a species protected by the Wild Animals Protection Ordinance, has been recorded in the grassland near Tai O (Lau 1996). Ryukyus Mouse Mus caroli, a locally restricted species, has been recorded in the grassland at Ngong Ping. The Bamboo Bat Tylonycteris pachypus, locally rare and restricted, is protected under the Wild Animals Protection Ordinance and is classified as "rare" in the China Red Data Book (Wang 1998). It has recently been found in bamboo clumps near Keung Shan (William Suen, pers. comm.). The tunnel in the Keung Shan catchwater is also a roost site for Large Mouse-eared Bat Myotis chinensis, Common Bent-winged Bat Miniopterus schreibersii, Greater Bent-winged Bat Miniopterus magnater, Bicoloured Leaf-nosed Bat Hipposideros pomona, Rufous Horseshoe Bat Rhinolophus rouxi and Least Horseshoe Bat Rhinolophus pusillus (Ades 1999). All bats are protected locally under the Wild Animals Protection Ordinance.

Table 8.5 Previous records of mammal species recorded within/near the Study Area (Ades 1999; Lau 1996; Lau, pers. comm.; William Suen, pers. comm.)

Habitat

Ngong Ping

Keung Shan

Tai O

Miniopterus magnater

Catchwater

ü

Miniopterus schreibersii

Catchwater

ü

Myotis chinensis

Catchwater

ü

Tylonycteris pachypus

Bamboo

ü

Rhinolophus rouxi

Catchwater

ü

Rhinolophus pusillus

Catchwater

ü

Hipposideros pomona

Catchwater

ü

Niviventer fulvescens

Forest

ü

ü

Rattus sikkimensis

Forest

ü

ü

Mus caroli

Grassland

ü

Muntiacus sp.

Grassland

ü

 

Survey Results


8.3.45 Only one bat species was observed during the survey (Table 8.6a). At least two individuals of the Japanese Pipistrelle Pipistrellus abramus were seen foraging above the abandoned saltpans at Tai O, and three individuals above abandoned cultivated lands at Keung Shan. The Japanese Pipistrelle is protected by the Wild Animals Protection Ordinance but is widespread and common in Hong Kong (Ades 1999).

Table 8.6a Mammal species recorded within the Study Area during the wet and dry season surveys

Habitat

Ngong Ping

Keung Shan

Tai O

Pipistrellus abramus

Tidal saltpan

+

Cultivated land

++

Relative abundance: + = 1-2, ++ = 3-5, +++ = 6-10, ++++ = over 10

 

8.3.46 Other mammal species recorded within the Study Area during the field surveys were of low conservation importance (Common Rat Rattus norvegicus and Sladen's Rat R. sladeni).

8.3.47 The only marine mammal recorded during the surveys in proximity to Tai O Bay was the Chinese White Dolphin. There were a total of 14 sightings of Chinese White Dolphins in waters off Tai O during surveys between September 2001 and March 2002. The results of the dolphin surveys are summarized in Table 8.6b and Drawing No. 23400/EN/068a, b, c, and d. The details of the sightings are presented in the following sections.

Table 8.6b Results of dolphin surveys.

7 Sept 2001

28 Oct 2001

15 Nov 2001

16 Jan 2002

28 Feb 2002

13 Mar 2002

25 Mar 2002

Survey time

0853-1225

1240-1650

1234-1640

0832-1240

1015-1530

0930-1330

1205-1605

Tide

Flood

Ebb

Flood

Ebb

Flood

Flood

Flood

Weather

Cloudy

Cloudy and windy

Sunny and clear

Sunny and clear

Cloudy

Sunny and windy

Cloudy to sunny

Beaufort sea state

0-2

4-5

3-4

0-2

1-2

2-4

3

Number of sighting

3

0

0

4

0

1

6

Species recorded

Sousa chinensis

-

-

Sousa chinensis

-

Sousa chinensis

Sousa chinensis

Total number of dolphins recorded

13-15

0

0

14-16

0

1

6


8.3.48 Sightings on 7 September 2001: The survey was conducted during the flood tide from 0853 to 1225 hrs. The weather was mainly cloudy, with Beaufort conditions between 0-2. A total of three sightings of the Chinese White Dolphin were observed during the survey (Drawing No. 23400/EN/068a). The first sighting was recorded at 1041 hrs. One dolphin was sighted very close to the nearby rocky outcrops under Beaufort 2 conditions, apparently engaged in feeding activities as the animal was circling and chasing fish on the water surface. The dolphin was observed for 10 minutes and then disappeared. The second sighting was recorded at 1057 hrs. Two adult dolphins were observed far away from the observation site (at least 1.5 km away) under Beaufort 1 conditions, surfacing frequently and disappearing after several minutes. The third sighting was recorded at 1129 hrs. A group of approximately ten to twelve dolphins was sighted following and feeding behind active fishing pair-trawlers under Beaufort 0-1 conditions. The group of dolphins, including adults and juveniles, were observed porpoising at least 2-3 km away from the observation site, frequently leaping out of the water. A mother-and-calf pair was observed in the group. The group was moving northward along with the pair-trawlers, closer to the observation site at 1210 hrs, and disappeared from view at 1215 hrs.

8.3.49 No sighting of dolphins were recorded on the 28th October or the survey on the 15th November 2001.

8.3.50 Sightings on 16 January 2002: The survey was conducted during the ebb tide from 0832 to 1240 hrs. The weather was sunny with good visibility, and the Beaufort sea state was between 0-2. A total of four sightings of Chinese White Dolphin were made during the survey (Drawing No. 23400/EN/068b). The first sighting was recorded at 0902 hrs. One adult dolphin was spotted 800 m away from the observation site under Beaufort 1 conditions, surfacing several times and disappearing after a few minutes. The second sighting was recorded at 0946 hrs. A group of six to eight dolphins was spotted 1.5 km away under Beaufort 2 conditions. The group was composed of juveniles and adults and was very active performing frequent aerial behaviours such as spyhopping, breaching and head-slapping. They were moving in northeasterly direction, and at a later point the group was split up into 2 smaller subgroups. The first subgroup disappeared at around 0955 hrs and the second subgroup remained in the area until 1020 hrs. The third sighting was recorded at 1025 hrs. A group of three dolphins (one juvenile and two adults) was spotted near the rocky outcrop 500m away from the observation site under Beaufort 2 conditions. They were very active with a lot of aerial behaviour (i.e. breaching and spyhopping). The animals stayed very close to the water surface, presumably feeding at the time. At 1105 hrs, another three individuals (an adult with two young juveniles) joined the group which stayed nearly 50 minutes in the area before disappearing after 1115 hrs. The fourth sighting was recorded at 1240 hrs. A group of four large adult dolphins was spotted staying close to a marine police boat 2 km away from the observation site under Beaufort 1 conditions. The group split into two subgroups (two adults in each subgroup), and they were resting and moving slowly.

8.3.51 No sightings of dolphin were made on the 28th February 2001.

8.3.52 Sightings on 13 March 2002: The survey was conducted during the flood tide from 0930 to 1330 hrs. The weather was mainly sunny and windy, with Beaufort conditions 2-4. There was only one sighting of a Chinese White Dolphin during the survey, recorded at 1140 hrs (Drawing No. 23400/EN/068c). The dolphin was observed far away from the observation site (at least 2.0 km away) under Beaufort 2 conditions, surfacing frequently and disappearing after 1 minute.

8.3.53 Sightings on 25 March 2002: The survey was conducted during the flood tide from 1205 to 1605 hrs. The weather changed from cloudy to sunny during the day of the survey. There were six sightings of dolphins. The first sighting was recorded at 1450 hrs. Two dolphins, through to be a mother-and-calf pair, were seen following a single-trawler (Drawing No. 23400/EN/068d). The two dolphins were spotted 800 m away from the observation site under Beaufort 3 conditions. The second sighting was recorded at 1520 hrs, with one individual spotted 900 m away under Beaufort 1 conditions. The third sighting was recorded at 1534 hrs. One subadult was seen spyhopping and breaching at 800 m away from the observation site under Beaufort 3 conditions. The fourth sighting was recorded at 1545 hrs. The observed subadult was seen spyhopping at 900 m away from the observation site under Beaufort 3 conditions. The fifth sighting was recorded at 1550 hrs. A subadult was seen at 1 km away from the observation site under Beaufort 3 conditions. The sixth sighting was recorded at 1600 hrs. An adult was spotted 700 m away from the observation site under Beaufort 3 conditions.

8.3.54 Based on the result of the surveys, the Chinese White Dolphins were observed to utilize the offshore areas more frequently than Tai O Bay itself. The behaviour of chasing fish, breaching, spyhopping and following fishing boats indicated that the dolphins use the offshore area as their feeding ground. Feeding activities appeared to be the predominant activity of the dolphins recorded in the offshore area. Different age classes were observed in the areas during the survey, including small calves and juveniles. The offshore area of Tai O Bay is therefore considered to be important habitat of the Chinese White Dolphin.

Invertebrates

Literature Review

8.3.55 Nine species of dragonflies, including 3 rare and 2 uncommon species, were reported within the Study Area (Wilson 1997) (Table 8.7). All were recorded at or near Keung Shan. Sinosticta ogatai and Melligomphus moluami are endemic to Hong Kong (ibid.). Protosticta beaumonti and Stylogomphus chunliuae are only recorded in a few places in Hong Kong. All these species are inhabitants of mountain streams. A new genus of Platystictidae (Sinosticta) and a new species of Protosticta were recorded in a small wooded ravine stream draining the northwest slopes of Keung Shan (ibid.). A rare species Polycanthagyna erythromelas was reported as present in high abundance at this site.

Table 8.7 Previous records of dragonfly species within the Study Area (Wilson 1995, 1997)

Species names

Locations

Remarks

Habitats

Commonness & distribution

Agriomorpha fusca

Ngau Kwo Tin, Keung Shan

Forested streams

FC

Coeliccia cyanomelas

Keung Shan

Slow flowing streams, marshes

C, W

Sinosticta ogatai

Keung Shan

Sinosticta is a monotypic genus endemic to Hong Kong and only recorded in 5 localities in Tai Mo Shan, Sunset Peak and Keung Shan.

Forested mountain streams

R, E

Protosticta beaumonti

Keung Shan

Only recorded in Keung Shan, Lantau Peak and Big Wave Bay (Hong Kong Island)

Forested mountain streams

R, E

Polycanthagyna erythromelas

Keung Shan

Forested mountain streams

R

Stylogomphus chunliuae

Keung Shan

Only recorded in Fujian outside Hong Kong, recorded in Tai Po Kau, Lam Tsuen Valley, Yuen Tun Ha, Tai Mo Shan, Keung Shan, Ng Tung Chai, Tung Chung and Yeung Ka Tsuen.

Forested streams

UC

Leptogomphus elegans

Keung Shan

Subspecies L. elegans hongkongensis only recorded in Hong Kong

Streams, ponds

FC, E

Melligomphus moluami

Ngau Kwo Tin, Keung Shan

Not recorded outside Hong Kong, recorded – Tai Po Kau, Mount Butler, Yuen Tun Ha, Ngau Kwo Tin, Keung Shan, Tung Chung and Big Wave Bay.

Streams

UC, E

Pseudothemis zonata

Keung Shan

Streams, marshes, ponds

C

Commonness and distribution: C = common, E = endemic, FC = fairly common, R = rare, UC = uncommon

8.3.56 Eight species of butterflies were reported by Bascombe in Ngong Ping in 1976 (Bascombe, unpublished data) (Table 8.8), of which there was one rare and three uncommon species, including Large Branded Swift Pelopidas subochraceus, Yellow Band Dart Potanthus parvus, Spotless Grass Yellow Eurema laeta and Common Tree Brown Lethe rohria. The habitats of these species are listed in Table 8.8.

Table 8.8 Previous records of dragonfly species within the Study Area (Wilson 1995, 1997)

Species names

Locations

Remarks

Habitats

Commonness & distribution

Agriomorpha fusca

Ngau Kwo Tin, Keung Shan

Forested streams

FC

Coeliccia cyanomelas

Keung Shan

Slow flowing streams, marshes

C, W

Sinosticta ogatai

Keung Shan

Sinosticta is a monotypic genus endemic to Hong Kong and only recorded in 5 localities in Tai Mo Shan, Sunset Peak and Keung Shan.

Forested mountain streams

R, E

Protosticta beaumonti

Keung Shan

Only recorded in Keung Shan, Lantau Peak and Big Wave Bay (Hong Kong Island)

Forested mountain streams

R, E

Polycanthagyna erythromelas

Keung Shan

Forested mountain streams

R

Stylogomphus chunliuae

Keung Shan

Only recorded in Fujian outside Hong Kong, recorded in Tai Po Kau, Lam Tsuen Valley, Yuen Tun Ha, Tai Mo Shan, Keung Shan, Ng Tung Chai, Tung Chung and Yeung Ka Tsuen.

Forested streams

UC

Leptogomphus elegans

Keung Shan

Subspecies L. elegans hongkongensis only recorded in Hong Kong

Streams, ponds

FC, E

Melligomphus moluami

Ngau Kwo Tin, Keung Shan

Not recorded outside Hong Kong, recorded – Tai Po Kau, Mount Butler, Yuen Tun Ha, Ngau Kwo Tin, Keung Shan, Tung Chung and Big Wave Bay.

Streams

UC, E

Pseudothemis zonata

Keung Shan

Streams, marshes, ponds

C

Commonness: VC = very common, C = common, UC = uncommon
Habitats follow Wu 1988, Chou 1994, Lau 1997, Bascombe et al. 1999, http://hkls.org

Survey Results


8.3.57 A total of 15 species of dragonfly were recorded at point count locations, including Pantala flavescens, Neurothemis fulvia and Orthetrum sabina (Appendix 8I). All recorded species are common and widespread in Hong Kong, and none are endemic to Hong Kong (Wilson 1997) or protected in Hong Kong or China. Relative abundance of dragonflies in each type of habitat in the Study Area is presented in Table 8.9. The highest abundance and species richness of dragonflies were recorded in abandoned cultivated lands, however, none of the dragonflies were recorded in grass-shrubland. No additional species were recorded outside point count locations within the Study Area.

Table 8.9 Abundance and species richness of dragonflies recorded within the Study Area in wet and dry season surveys

Habitats

Density

(individuals ha-1)

Species richness

(mean no. of species per sampling point)

Total area surveyed (ha)

Total no. of species recorded

Cultivated lands

21.8

1.4

0.756

10

Mangroves/ Marsh

8.9

0.9

0.504

4

Plantation

4.0

0.3

3.024

7

Stream

11.9

1.0

0.756

8

Woodland

4.4

0.5

1.260

8

Grass-shrubland

0.0

0.0

0.378

0

 

8.3.58 Twenty-two species of butterfly, including Angled Castor Ariadne ariadne, Dark Veined Tiger Danaus genutia, Common Mormon Papilio polytes and Common Grass Yellow Eurema hecabe were recorded at sampling points during the surveys (Appendix 8J). All recorded species were common or very common in Hong Kong (Walthew 1997), and none of the recorded butterfly species are protected in Hong Kong or China. The relative abundance of butterflies recorded in each type of habitat in the Study Area is presented in Table 8.10. Both abundance and species richness of butterflies were highest in woodland, which might be related to the higher plant diversity in woodland habitat (Preston-Mafham and Preston-Mafham 1988). No butterflies were recorded in grass-shrubland.

8.3.59 Two additional species, Yellow Pansy Junonia hierta and Common Lascar Pantoporia hordonia, were recorded within the Study Area but outside point count locations. Common Lascar is common or very common while Yellow Pansy is uncommon in Hong Kong (Walthew 1997). Yellow Pansy was recorded in abandoned cultivated lands and woodland in Keung Shan (Drawing No. 23400/EN/067). This species is usually found in open areas, and is recorded from a few scattered localities in Hong Kong (Bascombe et al. 1999).

Table 8.10 Abundance and species richness of butterflies recorded within the Study Area during the wet and dry season surveys

Habitats

Density

(individuals ha-1)

Species richness

(mean no. of species per sampling point)

Total area surveyed (ha)

Total no. of species recorded

Cultivated lands

9.9

1.2

0.756

10

Mangroves/ Marsh

5.0

0.6

0.504

4

Plantation

8.8

1.0

3.024

16

Stream

8.6

1.1

0.756

11

Woodland

18.3

1.4

1.260

14

Grass-shrubland

0.0

0.00

0.378

0

 

Aquatic Fauna

Literature Review

8.3.60 There is limited information on the aquatic fauna within the Study Area. Chong and Dudgeon (1992) reported that Lantau is an important area for native freshwater fish due to the abundance of relatively undisturbed waterways and freshwater marshy habitats. The eel Anguilla marmorata, listed in the China Red Data Book, was reported to occur in Lantau (Yue and Chen 1998, Chong and Dudgeon 1992).

Survey Results

8.3.61 Abundant freshwater crabs Somanniathelphusa zanklon were recorded in the middle section of the stream near the horse riding facility at Ngong Ping (Table 8.11). The density of freshwater crabs Somanniathelphusa zanklon (adults plus sub-adults) was estimated to reach 5-6 individual/m2 during the wet season survey. A lower density of about 4 individual/m2 was recorded in the dry season.

Table 8.11 Aquatic invertebrates recorded within the Study Area.

Common name

Scientific name

Location

Relative Abundance*

Wet season

Dry season

Freshwater crab

Somanniathelphusa zanklon

Ngong Ping

+++

++

Atyid shrimp

Caridina cantonensis

Tai O main stream

+++

+++

Palaemonid shrimp

Macrobrachium sp.

Tai O main stream

++

++

Caridean shrimp

Lender sp.

Tai O main stream

++

\

Local mitten crab

Eriocheir japonicus

Tai O main stream

++

\

*Relative abundance: +++ abundant; ++ common; + occasional


8.3.62 All the three freshwater crabs, Cryptopotamon anacoluthon, Nanhaipotamon hongkongense and Somanniathelphusa zanklon, found in Hong Kong are endemic. Among the three species, Cryptopotamon anacoluthon is most common, and usually occurs at greater abundance in Hong Kong. The mountain crab Nanhaipotamon hongkongense is usually found in, or close to, upland streams with clean water in Hong Kong, and thus could be regarded as an indicator for degree of naturalness in stream habitats. Somanniathelphusa zanklon belongs to a different family (Parathelphusidae) to the above two species. This crab is usually found in lowland habitats such as rice fields, irrigation ditches, flooded furrows and slow-flowing streams and rivers (Dudgeon and Corlett 1994).

8.3.63 Atyid shrimp Caridina cantonensis and Palaemonid shrimp Macrobrachium sp. were recorded in Tai O main stream during both the wet and dry season, while local mitten crab Eriocheir japonicus and another Caridean shrimp Lender sp. were recorded only in the wet season (Table 8.11). During the surveys, abundant Caridina cantonensis were found in the upper course of the Tai O main stream, near the confluence of the streams from Keung Shan and Ngau Kwo Tin. The density of the Atyid shrimp might reach over 50 individual/m2 for both the wet and dry seasons.

8.3.64 The genus Caridina belongs to the Family Atyidae, Infraorder Caridea. The Atyidae has the first two pairs of pereiopods (walking legs) chelate and is characterized by well-developed tufts of setae for the collection of food. Caridina spp. are tiny animals with the body length around 2 cm. They are detritivores feeding mainly on leaf litter from riparian vegetation. Members of this genus are usually found in mountain streams with clean water. In Hong Kong at least three species of this genus have been reported, namely, Caridina cantonensis, Caridina apodosis and Caridina serrata. Caridina cantonensis is the commonest one, and can be found in various locations throughout Hong Kong.

8.3.65 During the survey on 28 September 2001, many dead fish were found in the Tai O main stream, while the stream from Ngau Kwo Tin was not affected as some sensitive fish species requiring a higher standard of water quality, i.e. Pseudogastromyzon myersi were recorded.

8.3.66 A diverse fish community was recorded within the Study Area with a total of 43 fish species, including Yaoshanicus arcus, Capoeta semifasciolata, Poecilia reticulata, Liniparhomaloptera disparis, and Lutjanus argentimaculatus, recorded in the freshwater streams from upper Keung Shan to Ngau Kwo Tin to Tai O. Thirty-four species of fish were recorded within the Study Area during the wet season surveys, while thirty-five species of fish were recorded during the dry season surveys (Appendix 8K). Similar number of freshwater fish species were recorded in the two seasons. No freshwater water fish were recorded at Ngong Ping during the surveys.

8.3.67 Except Anguilla marmorata, listed as vulnerable in the China Red Data Book (Yue and Chen, 1998), and Yaoshanicus arcus, endemic to South China (previously thought to be restricted to eastern New Territories in Hong Kong (Chong and Dudgeon, 1992), no recorded species are rare, endangered, or endemic.

8.3.68 Anguilla marmorata is listed as vulnerable in the China Red Data Book because it is widely hunted for its meat and is believed to be overfished, but this species may still be widespread in Hong Kong. Yaoshanicus arcus has recently been found on Lantau and is restricted to the northwestern portion of this island (Bosco Chan, unpublished data). It is locally common with restricted distribution in Hong Kong and is of moderate conservation value. Among the recorded freshwater species, Clarius fuscus, Gambusia affinis affinis and Poecilia reticulata are introduced species without any conservation significance.

Table 8.12 Freshwater fish of conservation value recorded within the Study Area

Species

Location

Relative Abundance

Wet season

Dry season

Anguilla marmorata

Near Ngau Kwo Tin, upper and lower sections of Tai O main stream.

+

Yaoshanicus arcus

Lower Keung Shan (stream from Ling Yan Monastery and stream from Cheung Ting).

+++

++

*Relative abundance: + = <10 individuals, ++ = 11-30 individuals, +++ = >30 individuals

 

Tai O Creek and Reed bed


Literature Review


8.3.69 The aquatic organisms caught by the methods of cast netting and tidal netting were mainly Leiognathus daura, Tilapia mossambica (renamed as Oreochromis mossambicus), Mugil affinis, Elops saurus and Scylla serrata (Scott Wilson, 2000).

Survey Results

8.3.70 A total of eleven species of aquatic organisms were caught in Tai O Creek and Tai O Reedbed by fine-mesh cast netting and three-layer gill netting during the survey period (Table 8.13 and Drawing No. 23400/EN/062). Raw data are presented in Appendix 8L & Appendix 8M. The total abundance of each catch, cast net or gill net, was low in wet season (less than 7 individuals), and higher in dry season (the maximum number of individuals caught in one location was 18). Among the caught organisms, Mugil affinis was the most frequently recorded species in wet season, while Penaeus penicillatus in dry season.

Table 8.13 Total number of individuals of aquatic organisms collected by cast netting and gill netting.

Tai O Creek

Tai O Reedbed

Common Name

Species Name

1

2

3

4

5 (1)

5 (2)

WET SEASON

Cast Netting

Mojarra

Gerres lucida

0

1

0

-

Mullet

Mugil affinis

2

4

1

-

Gill Netting

Mud crab

Scylla serrata

1

0

0

0

0

0

Prawn

Penaeus penicillatus

0

0

1

0

0

0

Rabbitfish

Siganus canaliculatus

1

1

0

3

0

0

Mullet

Mugil affinis

1

1

0

1

2

1

Striped eel

Plotosus lineatus

0

0

1

0

0

0

Sillago

Sillago sihama

0

0

0

1

0

0

Japanese Flathead

Inegocia japonica

0

0

0

1

0

0

Mojarra

Gerres lucida

0

0

0

1

1

0

Ponyfish

Leiognathus daura

0

0

0

0

1

2

Seabream

Acanthopagrus australis

0

0

0

0

0

1

Tilapia

Oreochromis mossambicus

0

0

0

0

0

2

Total number of species

3

3

3

5

3

4

Total number of individuals

5

7

3

7

2

6

DRY SEASON

Common Name

Species Name

1

2

3

4

5 (1)

5 (2)

Cast Netting

Mojarra

Gerres lucida

1

2

1

-

Mullet

Mugil affinis

0

1

0

-

Penaeid shrimp

Penaeus penicillatus

2

1

1

Ponyfish

Leiognathus daura

3

Goby

Acentrogobius sp.

2

Rabbitfish

Siganus canaliculatus

1

Elops saurus

4

Gill Netting

Mud crab

Scylla serrata

0

0

0

1

0

0

Penaeid shrimp

Penaeus penicillatus

0

8

1

4

0

0

Mullet

Mugil affinis

0

2

1

1

0

2

Japanese Flathead

Inegocia japonica

0

1

0

0

0

0

Mojarra

Gerres lucida

0

1

1

0

2

0

Ponyfish

Leiognathus daura

0

2

1

0

1

0

Tilapia

Oreochromis mossambicus

3

1

Goby

Glossogobius sp.

0

0

0

1

0

0

Total number of species

2

5

7

4

3

2

Total number of individuals

3

18

16

6

6

3

 

Intertidal Flora and Fauna


Literature Review


8.3.71 Intertidal fauna recorded in Tai O were mainly periwinkles (including Nodilittorina millegrana and Littorina scabra), Cerithidea rhizophorarum, Monodonta labio and mud skippers Periophthalmus cantonensis (Scott Wilson, 2000). A variety of mangrove and mangrove associates, including Kandelia candel, Avicennia marina, Bruguiera gymnorhiza, Clerodendrum inerme, Hibiscus tiliaceus, Acanthus ilicifolius, Acrostichum aureum, Excoecaria agallocha and Aegiceras corniculatum were recorded in Tai O intertidal areas (Scott Wilson, 2000).

Survey Results


8.3.72 In total, 8 species of animals and 1 species of macroalga were recorded on the artificial boulder shore in wet season, and 9 species of fauna were recorded in the dry season (Appendix 8O, Table 8.14, Drawing No. 23400/EN/062). Animals recorded on the shores at the surveyed sites were largely herbivorous molluscs, including the nerite Nerita albicilla on the high (2.5 m above CD), mid (2.0 m above Chart Datum) and low (1.5 m above CD) shore, and periwinkles Littorina scabra on the high shore (Table 8.14). The species diversity and evenness are presented in Table 8.14, which indicated that the artificial boulder shore has low diversity in both wet and dry season, but the H' value is relatively higher in dry season. The predatory gastropod Thais clavigera (the common dogwhelk) was also recorded in the low shore region. Sessile filter-feeding barnacles such as the rock oyster Saccostrea cucullata were also common on the shores (Table 8.14). The mussel Septifer virgatus and the acorn barnacle Tetraclita squamosa were also recorded on the shores but in low abundances during wet and dry season. The macroalgae Ulva lactuca was recorded in wet season but was not found in the dry season survey.

Table 8.14 Mean number of individuals, Species Diversity (H’) and Evenness (J’) (standard deviation) of intertidal organisms recorded from the artificial boulder shore during the survey.

High-intertidal Zone

Mid-intertidal Zone

Low-intertidal Zone

WET SEASON

Snail (No./m2)

Littorina scabra

261.6 ± 175.2

0

0

Thais clavigera

0

4.8 ± 4.4

29.6 ± 10.8

Monodonta labio

0.8 ± 1.8

0

0

Nerita albicilla

31.2 ± 12.1

83.2 ± 30.4

31.2 ± 23.9

Crustaceans (No./m2)

Hermit Crab

0

0.8 ± 1.8

0

Barnacle (% cover)

Tetraclita squamosa

0

3± 2.7

0

Bivalve (% cover)

Septifer virgatus

3.4 ± 6.5

5 ± 3.5

23 ± 4.5

Saccostrea cucullata

11 ± 6.5

39 ± 20

19 ± 5.5

Algae (% cover)

Ulva lactuca

0

0

1± 2.2

Species Diversity (H’)*

0.18 ± 0.12

0.05 ± 0.04

0.25 ± 0.04

Evenness (J’)*

0.52 ± 0.28

0.23 ± 0.05

0.82 ± 0.11

 

DRY SEASON

Snail (No./m2)

Littorina scabra

188.4 ± 88.9

0

0

Thais clavigera

0

5.2 ± 3.6

18.8 ± 6.8

Monodonta labio

0

1.4 ± 2.2

2.6 ± 2.6

Nerita albicilla

9.6 ± 6.3

23.8 ± 8.3

18.6 ± 9.2

Crustaceans (No./m2)

Hermit Crab

0

0

7.6 ± 5.9

Hemigrapsus sanguinolentus

0

0

1 ± 1.4

Barnacle (% cover)

Tetraclita squamosa

0

13 ± 21.1

0

Bivalve (% cover)

Septifer virgatus

1 ± 2.2

6 ± 5.5

25 ± 10

Saccostrea cucullata

5 ± 3.5

26 ± 13.9

20 ± 10

Algae (% cover)

Ulva lactuca

0

0

0

Species Diversity (H’)*

0.34 ± 0.12

1.49 ± 0.04

1.67 ± 0.04

Evenness (J’)*

0.24 ± 0.28

0.83 ± 0.05

0.86 ± 0.11

Note: * - The species diversity and evenness excluded the sessile organisms which using percentage cover to represent their abundance.

 

Horseshoe Crab


Literature Review


8.3.73 Horseshoe crabs were reported to be occasionally sold in the Tai O market (Mott MacDonald et al. 1991). Huang et al. (1998) reported that adult Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda are "frequently fished from the subtidal mud" of north-west Lantau, including Tai O. Living adult horseshoe crabs Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda and Tachypleus tridentatus were reported in Tai O (Chiu and Morton, 1999). Interviews of local fishers were conducted to investigate the occurrence of horseshoe crabs in the proposed anchorage site at Tai O (Scott Wilson 2000). It was found that horseshoe crabs were occasionally caught inside Tai O Bay, and even in the intertidal portion of Tai O Creek. However no horseshoe crabs were found in the field surveys for Tai O Sheltered Boat Anchorage EIA. Only dead horseshoe crabs were seen entangled in abandoned fishing nets along the saltpan perimeter (ibid).

Survey Results


8.3.74 No signs or tracks of horseshoe crabs were recorded within the Study Area during the dry-season and wet-season surveys for the present project. Horseshoe crabs, three species of which occur in the South China Sea, are thought to be at risk from over-harvesting and in Hong Kong possibly from loss of habitat (Huang et al. 1998). Local fishermen noted that horseshoe crabs are more often seen on more sandy shores such as at Yi O, indicating that while Tai O is a suitable habitat, it is not the most preferred habitat (Scott Wilson 2000).
Benthic Fauna

Literature Review

8.3.75 A total 39 species of benthos, dominated by molluscs and polychaetes, were recorded from grab samples in Tai O Bay (Scott Wilson, 2000).

 

Survey Results


8.3.76 A total of 43 species and 4234 individual benthic organisms were recorded at the nine sites (Sites A to I, 3 replicates in each site) at Tai O in the wet season sampling, and 933 individuals from 34 species were recorded in the dry season sampling (Table 8.15).


8.3.77 Raw data for the wet season and dry season survey are presented in Appendix 8N. Six major taxa (Phylum) were recorded. Crustaceans dominated at Sites C, D, E and F (over 85%), and polychaetes dominated at Sites B and G (over 87%) in wet season. For dry season, crustacean still dominated at Sites C & F (over 60%) but polychaetes dominated at another 3 sites (Sites A, D & E) besides Sites B & G. At Site I, the abundance of polychaetes and crustaceans were similar in dry season (both about 45%). No rare species were recorded in the samples collected during the wet and dry season surveys. The amphipod Apseudes mortoni was the dominant species in wet season and comprised over 70% (2999 individuals) of the total abundance. The total number of individuals and density were highest at Site F in wet season (total number was 1959), which is located in the inner Tai O Creek, while lowest were at Site H (no living organisms recorded in both wet and dry seasons), which is located at the mouth of the Tai O Creek (Table 8.15). The total number of species recorded was highest at Sites B (19 species in wet season and 23 species in dry season), which is located away from the Tai O Creek, while lowest at Site H (No record in both wet and dry seasons) (Table 8.15).

Table 8.15 Mean number of individuals (standard deviation) of benthos recorded from Sites A to I during the survey.

Abundance (Mean No. of individuals/grab ± SD)

Phylum

Site A

Site B

Site C

Site D

Site E

Site F

Site G

Site H

Site I

Wet season

Polychaeta

7.7± 4 (29)

115± 56 (88.2)

11± 5.7 (3.9)

3.7± 3.8 (2.9)

3.3± 2.9 (2.1)

14± 1 (2.1)

15± 8 (87)

0

15± 7.8 (58.4)

Oligochaeta

2± 2 (7.7)

1± 1.7 (0.8)

25± 21 (9.0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

33.7± 4 (5.2)

0 (0)

0

0 (0)

Bivalvia

0 (0)

5± 4.4 (3.8)

5.3± 6.1 (2)

0 (0)

0.7± 1.2 (0.4)

17.7± 6.8 (2.7)

0.0± 1 (2)

0

1.7± 0.6 (6.5)

Gastropoda

0.3± 0.6 (1.3)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0

0.3± 0.6 (1.3)

Crustacea

16± 9.6 (62)

9.3± 4.9 (7.2)

230± 175 (85)

123± 42 (96.8)

156± 15 (97.5)

587± 71 (89.8)

2± 2 (9)

0

8.3± 0.6 (32.5)

Osteichthyes

0 (0)

0 (0)

0.3± 0.6 (0.1)

0.3± 0.6 (0.3)

0 (0)

1± 1 (0.2)

0.0± 1 (2)

0

0.3± 0.6 (1.3)

Total no. of species

11

19

12

12

14

15

12

0

17

Total no. of individuals

78

391

814

381

481

1959

53

0

77

Dry season

Polychaeta

14.7± 5.9 (54)

88.3± 91.7 (93)

11.7± 2.5 (27)

14.7± 6.1 (68)

12.3± 9.9 (49)

10.7± 4.2 (19)

11± 9.5 (54)

0

7.7± 4 (47)

Oligochaeta

1 (4)

1 (1)

0 (0)

0 (0)

1 (4)

4 (7)

0 (0)

0

0 (0)

Bivalvia

2.7± 2.5 (10)

0.7± 1.2 (1)

2.7± 2.5 (6)

3± 3.6 (14)

1.7± 1.5 (7)

0.3± 0.6 (0.5)

2.7± 2.5 (13)

0

0.3± 0.6 (1.8)

Gastropoda

1.5± 0.7 (5)

2 (2)

3 (7)

1 (4)

2 (8)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0

1 (6.2)

Crustacea

7.3± 6.6 (27)

3± 3 (3)

26.3± 13.2 (60)

3± 1.7 (14)

8± 12.2 (32)

42± 16.5 (73.5)

6.7± 2.1 (33)

0

7.3± 10.1 (45)

Total no. of species

20

23

16

17

20

18

15

0

16

Total no. of individuals

78

339

125

63

56

163

62

0

47

Note: The percentage of the abundance (pooling the 3 replicates) of each taxa (Phylum) recorded in the site was presented as the number within the bracket.

 

8.3.78 The overall benthos species diversity (H') was low, the mean value ranging from 0.10 to 0.86 in wet season and 0.68 to 1.23 in dry season. The lowest H' was recorded at Site H (no living organisms recorded), which is located at the mouth of the Tai O Creek, while the highest at Site I in wet season and Site C in dry season, which are both located away from the mouth of Tai O Creek (Table 8.16a). For the Shannon-Weiner index (H'), a value of < 1 indicates low diversity, 1-2 indicates moderate diversity and a value of > 2 indicates higher diversity. The mean value of the evenness (J') recorded in the eight sites ranged from 0.13 to 0.86 in wet season and 0.33 to 0.63 in dry season. The evenness index reflects how similar the abundance values for each species are within an assemblage. For example, a value of 1 indicates that all species occur in equal abundance whereas a value close to zero indicates that one species has very high abundance and the other species are recorded at very low abundance. The evenness indices indicate that there were limited number of species of benthic organisms recorded within the sites and they were patchily distributed.

Table 8.16a Mean value of species diversity (H’) and Evenness (J’) (standard deviation) of benthos recorded from Sites A to I during the survey.

Site A

Site B

Site C

Site D

Site E

Site F

Site G

Site H

Site I

Wet season

Species Diversity (H’)

0.52 ± 0.11

0.47 ± 0.17

0.46 ± 0.16

0.10 ± 0.05

0.19 ± 0.06

0.35 ± 0.03

0.52 ± 0.08

-

0.86 ± 0.13

Evenness (J’)

0.73 ± 0.11

0.46 ± 0.09

0.51 ± 0.22

0.13 ± 0.02

0.25 ± 0.08

0.33 ± 0.05

0.74 ± 0.14

-

0.86 ± 0.06

Dry season

Species Diversity (H’)

0.68 ± 0.03

0.77 ± 0.74

1.23 ± 0.51

0.73 ± 0.26

0.75 ± 0.83

1.05 ± 0.04

0.77 ± 0.28

-

1.01 ± 0.62

Evenness (J’)

0.33 ± 0.01

0.34 ± 0.36

0.60 ± 0.23

0.40 ± 0.21

0.34 ± 0.37

0.53 ± 0.04

0.53 ± 0.40

-

0.63 ± 0.53

 

8.3.79 The identification of the benthic samples was audited and passed the QA check. The results of the benthic samples were re-processed (10% of the sorted and identified samples) by another specialist and matched the list of the species identified during the first identification work.

Mangrove


8.3.80 Mangrove refers to habitats with woody vegetation dominated by salt-tolerant species found on inter-tidal areas. Eight mangrove stands were identified within the Study Area (at Tai O) (Table 8.16b). Major mangrove species found in the Study Area included Kandelia candel, Avicennia marina and Aegiceras corniculatum. There were limited number of individuals of mangrove plants recorded within the mangrove stands A, C, F and H. The largest and most dense mangrove stands were recorded at site B.

8.3.81 Since the mangrove stands A, D to G are permanently submerged in water, epifaunal survey was not undertaken. Findings of the surveys for mangrove stands B, C and H indicated that the mangrove fauna in was dominated by the cerithid (Cerithidea rhizophorarum) and fiddler crabs (Uca spp.). Sesarma crabs (Pseudosesarma patshuni) and mud skippers (Periophthalmus cantonensis) were also common in mangrove stands B, C and H.

Table 8.16b Floral and Faunal Species Recorded in the Mangrove Stands Identified within the Study Area.

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

True Mangrove

Kandelia candel

+

++++

+

++

+++

+

++

+

Avicennia marina

+++

+

++

+

+

+

Bruguiera gymnorhiza

+

Aegiceras corniculatum

+

++

++

+

Mangrove Associates

Clerodendrum inerme

+

+

Hibiscus tiliaceus

+

+

+

+

Acanthus ilicifolius

+

+

++

+

+

Acrostichum aureum

+

+

++

+++

Reed

Phragmites australis

+

+

+++

++++

Epifauna

Cerithidea rhizophorarum

++++

+++

Terebralia sulcata

++

+

Uca lactea

+++

++

Uca chlorophthalmus crassipes

+++

+

++

Pseudosesarma patshuni

++

++

Periophthalmus cantonensis

++

+

++

Relative abundance: ++++ = abundant, +++ = common, ++ = occasional, + = scarce


8.4 Evaluation of Habitats and Species


Habitat Evaluation


The ecological importance of the habitats identified was evaluated against the criteria in Annex 8 of the EIAO TMEIA. This evaluation is presented in Tables 8.17 - 8.25.

Table 8.17 Evaluation of Plantation within the Study Area

Criteria

Discussion

Naturalness

Low to moderate, human created habitat but with natural recolonisation.

Size

The total size of this habitat is approximately 188ha.

Diversity

High plant species diversity but partly contributed by exotic/landscaping species, low to moderate diversity for fauna.

Rarity

One protected (but mainly planted) tree species, Camellia sinensis and one restricted tree species, Celtis timorensis, recorded in Ngong Ping SSSI. Five protected bird species, Black-eared Kite, Buzzard, Crested Serpent Eagle, Hwamei and Greater Coucal, were recorded.

Re-creatability

This habitat can be readily re-created, but no guarantee on species composition.

Fragmentation

Less fragmented.

Ecological Linkage

Partly within and very close to the Lantau Peak SSSI which has rich and rare flora.

Potential value

Hillside plantation can develop into mature woodland upon management including thinning and weeding. Limited potential for roadside and landscaping plantation.

Nursery/Breeding Ground

A recently fledged Great Tit was been recorded in plantation at Ngong Ping. Plantation in the Study Area can provide breeding habitats for birds and butterflies. The Tai O egretry is located on plantation on Fu Shan.

Age

Young.

Abundance/Richness of Wildlife

Moderate.

Overall Ecological Value

Low to moderate in general, moderate for the plantation within Ngong Ping SSSI and Tai O egretry.

 

Table 8.18 Evaluation of Woodland within the Study Area

Criteria

Discussion

Naturalness

Fairly natural and dominated by native species.

Size

Large stands on some hillsides, some restricted along ravines on grassy hillsides. The total size of this habitat is approximately 132.2ha.

Diversity

Moderate to high plant species diversity, low to moderate for the fauna.

Rarity

Four rare/protected species, Black-eared Kite, Lesser Coucal, Chestnut Bulbul and White’s Thrush, were recorded.

Re-creatability

Difficult to create in terms of species composition.

Fragmentation

Not fragmented.

Ecological Linkage

Partly within and very close to Lantau Peak SSSI which has rich and rare flora.

Potential value

Moderate with management such as thinning and weeding.

Nursery/Breeding Ground

No record of significant nursery or breeding ground during the surveys. But could provide breeding habitats for birds, mammals and butterflies.

Age

Young.

Abundance/Richness of Wildlife

The abundance and diversity of birds and butterflies recorded were low and moderate respectively.

Overall Ecological Value

Moderate.

 

Table 8.19 Evaluation of Grass-Shrubland within the Study Area

Criteria

Discussion

Naturalness

Natural, occasionally with planted species. Subject to high level of human disturbance

Size

Large continuous patch on upper hillslopes within the Study Area. The total size of this habitat is approximately 338.9ha.

Diversity

Moderate to high plant species diversity, low fauna diversity.

Rarity

Two protected orchids, Arundina chinensis and Spathoglottis pubescens, and two protected shrubs, Enkianthus quinqueflorus and Rhododendron farrerae, were recorded next to Sze Tse Tau Shan. Protected species recorded during surveys included Black-eared Kite and Greater Coucal.

Re-creatability

This habitat can be re-created, but some native species are not commercially available.

Fragmentation

Less fragmented.

Ecological Linkage

Partly within and very close to Lantau Peak SSSI which has rich and rare flora.

Potential value

Moderate, become secondary woodland over time, but limited by fire disturbance.

Nursery/Breeding Ground

No record of significant nursery or breeding ground during the surveys.

Age

Young.

Abundance/Richness of Wildlife

Low wildlife richness and abundance.

Overall Ecological Value

Low.

 

Table 8.20 Evaluation of Cultivated Lands within the Study Area

Criteria

Discussion

Naturalness

Human-created habitat but abandoned, mostly with remnants of crops or weedy species.

Size

Small within the Study Area. The total size of this habitat is approximately 15.5ha.

Diversity

Moderate plant species diversity, low to moderate for the wildlife.

Rarity

Protected species recorded during the surveys included Common Rat Snake and Japanese Pipistrelle.

Re-creatability

This habitat can be readily re-created, but no guarantee on species composition.

Fragmentation

Isolated stands scattered in the Study Area.

Ecological Linkage

Not functionally linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity.

Potential value

Low, but those fed by streams may become more natural marsh over time.

Nursery/Breeding Ground

No record of significant nursery or breeding ground during the surveys.

Age

Young.

Abundance/Richness of Wildlife

The abundance and diversity of invertebrates and other wildlife recorded were moderate and low respectively.

Overall Ecological Value

Low to moderate.

 

Table 8.21 Evaluation of Mangroves/Marsh within the Study Area

Criteria

Discussion

Naturalness

Semi-natural, mostly originated from abandoned fields/ ponds/ salt pans.

Size

Small within the Study Area. The total size of this habitat is approximately 16.2ha.

Diversity

Low plant species diversity, moderate for birds, low for the other terrestrial wildlife.

Rarity

Rare/protected species recorded during the surveys included Reef Egret and Black-eared Kite.

Re-creatability

This habitat can be readily re-created provided substrate with proper levels and tidal flux is provided.

Fragmentation

Fragmented.

Ecological Linkage

This habitat is subject to tidal influence and linked to fish pond habitat.

Potential value

High, may increase in size with time.

Nursery/Breeding Ground

Recently fledged Chinese Bulbul and Oriental Magpie Robin have been recorded in mangrove areas. Crested Myna was recorded carrying nesting materials into mangrove areas. Mangroves are reported as important nursery ground for fisheries.

Age

Young.

Abundance/Richness of Wildlife

The abundance of birds and other wildlife recorded were moderate and low respectively.

Overall Ecological Value

High.

 

Table 8.22 Evaluation of Fishponds within the Study Area

Criteria

Discussion

Naturalness

Human-created but abandoned. All the fish ponds are tidally influenced.

Size

Small within the Study Area. The total size of this habitat is approximately 16.7ha.

Diversity

Low plant species diversity, moderate for birds, low for other terrestrial wildlife diversity.

Rarity

Japanese Pipistrelle, Reef Egret, and Black-eared Kite were recorded during the surveys.

Re-creatability

This habitat can be readily re-created.

Fragmentation

Isolated within the Study Area.

Ecological Linkage

This habitat is subject to tidal influence and linked to mangroves/marsh habitat.

Potential value

It could become mangroves/marsh habitat over time if left unmanaged.

Nursery/Breeding Ground

No record of significant nursery or breeding ground during the surveys.

Age

Young.

Abundance/Richness of Wildlife

The abundance of birds and other wildlife recorded were moderate and low respectively.

Overall Ecological Value

Moderate.

 

Table 8.23 Evaluation of Streams within the Study Area

 

Criteria

Discussion

Naturalness

Natural at upper reach, modified sections can be found at middle or lower reaches.

Size

The total length of the freshwater streams is over 7km.

Diversity

Low aquatic invertebrate species and other wildlife diversity, freshwater fish species assemblages was diverse as 43 species were recorded.

Rarity

Romer’s Tree Frog and Short-legged Toad were recorded in Ngong Ping and Keung Shan respectively. Anguilla marmorata was recorded in Tai O main stream and Yaoshanicus arcus was recorded in Lower Keung Shan and Tai O main stream.

Re-creatability

Difficult to be re-created.

Fragmentation

Not applicable.

Ecological Linkage

Not functionally linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity.

Potential value

Medium, more aquatic species could establish if given time.

Nursery/Breeding Ground

The stream in Ngong Ping was reported to be the breeding ground for Romer's Tree Frog and dragonflies.

Age

No information but considered irrelevant.

Abundance/Richness of Wildlife

Relatively high richness and abundance of freshwater fish.

Overall Ecological Value

High except the modified sections.

 

 

Table 8.24 Evaluation of Urbanised Area within the Study Area

Criteria

Discussion

Naturalness

Low. Heavily disrupted and disturbed by human activities.

Size

The total size of this habitat is approximately 68.8ha.

Diversity

Moderate in terms of floristic diversity but low in structural diversity.

Rarity

Neither rare nor protected species recorded during the surveys.

Re-creatability

This habitat can be readily re-created.

Fragmentation

Heavily fragmented.

Ecological Linkage

Not functionally linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity.

Potential value

Low.

Nursery/Breeding Ground

Black-necked Starlings was recorded carrying nesting materials in urbanised areas. Limited as breeding ground for wildlife due to high human disturbance.

Age

No information but considered irrelevant.

Abundance/Richness of Wildlife

The abundance and richness of wildlife recorded were low.

Overall Ecological Value

Low.

 

Table 8.25 Evaluation of Marine Habitats within the Study Area

Criteria

Discussion

Intertidal

Benthic

Naturalness

Low. Most of the intertidal habitats within the Study Area heavily disrupted and disturbed by human activities, except the section of artificial boulder shore located oustside the saltpans was identified as semi-natural.

Moderate. Disturbed by pollution loadings.

Size

The total size of this habitat is about 1000m in length, of which approximately 400 m is semi-natural artificial boulder shore..

About 20 hectares in size.

Diversity

Low, even on the semi-natural section.

Low.

Rarity

Neither rare nor protected species recorded during the surveys.

Neither rare nor protected species recorded during the surveys

Re-creatability

This habitat can be readily re-created.

Difficult to be re-created.

Fragmentation

Fragmented.

Not fragmented.

Ecological Linkage

Not functionally linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity.

Connecting the Tai O Bay and Tai O Creek.

Potential value

Low.

Low if the present pollution loading from Tai O unchanged.

Nursery/Breeding Ground

No record of significant nursery or breeding ground was found during the surveys.

Potentially a nursery and breeding ground for marine organisms. Its function, however, is limited by the present pollution level.

Age

No information but considered irrelevant.

N/A

Abundance/Richness of Wildlife

The abundance and richness of wildlife recorded were low.

The abundance of wildlife was moderate, but the diversity was low

Overall Ecological Value

Low.

Moderate

 

Species Evaluation


The list and evaluation of the floral and faunal species of ecological interest recorded within the Study Area, according to the TMEIAP, are given in Tables 8.26 and 8.27:

Table 8.26 Evaluation of floral species of ecological interest recorded within the Study Area

Species

Common Name

Growth Form

Location

Protection Status

Distribution

Rarity

Camellia sinensis

Tea

Shrub/ Tree

Plantation near Ngong Ping

Protected

Sunset Peak, Tai Mo Shan

Rare, also planted

Celtis timorensis

-

Tree

Plantation near Ngong Ping

Not protected

Tung Chung, Aberdeen, Shek O

Restricted

Arundina chinense

Bamboo Orchid

Herb

Grass-shrubland near Sze Tsz Tau Shan

Protected

Ting Kau, Sai Kung, Hong Kong Island

Very common

Spathoglottis pubescens

Buttercup Orchid

Herb

Grass-shrubland near Sze Tsz Tau Shan

Protected

Shing Mun

Very common

Aquilaria sinensis

Incense Tree

Tree

Plantation at Ngong Ping SSSI and woodland at Keung Shan

Category III nationally protected species in China and listed as vulnerable in the China Plant Red Data Book,

Commonly found in lowland forests and fung shui woods

Common

Enkianthus quinqueflorus

Chinese New Year Flower

Shrub

Grass-shrubland near Sze Tsz Tau Shan

Protected

Pokfulam, Ting Kau, Sai Kung

Common

Rhododendron farrerae

Farrer’s Azalea

Shrub

Grass-shrubland near Sze Tsz Tau Shan

Protected

Commonly found in shrubland

Common

 

Table 8.27 Evaluation of faunal species of ecological interest recorded within the Study Area

Common Name

Species

Location

Protection Status

Distribution

Rarity

Japanese Pipistrelle

Pipistrellus abramus

Salt pans at Tai O

Abandoned cultivated land at Keung Shan

All bats are protected in Hong Kong

Widespread in Hong Kong

Common

Chinese White Dolphin

Sousa chinensis

Outer Tai O Bay

All cetaceans are protected in Hong Kong

Class I Protected Animal in PRC, Appendix I of CITES

Concentrated in western Hong Kong water

Not uncommon in western Hong Kong water

Greater Coucal

Centropus sinensis

Plantation in Ngong Ping

All birds are protected in Hong Kong, Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC, "vulnerable" in China Red Data Book

Widespread in Hong Kong

Common

Lesser Coucal

Centropus bengalensis

Woodland in Keung Shan and plantation in Ngong Ping, and near the reed bed in Tai O

All birds are protected in Hong Kong, Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC, "vulnerable" in China Red Data Book

Widespread in Hong Kong

Common

Reef Egret

Egretta sacra

Along the bund of salt pan in Tai O

All birds are protected in Hong Kong, Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC and rare in China Red Data Book

Hong Kong’s coastal areas

Common

Black-eared Kite

Milvus lineatus

Above reed bed, fish pond and salt pans in Tai O

All birds are protected in Hong Kong, Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC and Appendix II of CITES

Widespread in Hong Kong

Very common

White-bellied Sea Eagle

Haliaeetus leucogaster

Above mangroves and marshes in Tai O

All birds are protected in Hong Kong, Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC and Appendix II of CITES

Hong Kong’s coastal areas, only recorded in Hong Kong and nowhere else in China

Uncommon/rare

Crested Serpent Eagle

Spilornis cheela

Plantation in Keung Shan; calling for territories

All birds are protected in Hong Kong, Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC and Appendix II of CITES

"rare" in China Red Data Book

Localised in distribution in Hong Kong

Rare

Buzzard

Buteo buteo

Plantation in Tai O

All birds are protected in Hong Kong, Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC and Appendix II of CITES

Widespread in Hong Kong

Uncommon

Hwamei

Garrulax canorus

Plantation in Keung Shan

All birds are protected in Hong Kong, Appendix II of CITES

Widespread in Hong Kong

Common

Romer’s Tree Frog

Philautus romeri

Seasonal stream at Ngong Ping

Protected under the Wild Animals Protected Ordinance

Lamma Island, Po Toi, Lantau Islands

Restricted, endemic

Short-legged Toad

Megophrys brachykolos

Stream near Keung Shan

Not protected

Hong Kong Island, Lantau Island, Ho Chung

Rather restricted, possible endemic

Common Rat Snake

Ptyas mucosus

Cultivated land in Keung Shan

Listed on Appendix II of CITES, "endangered" in China Red Data Book

Common and widespread in Hong Kong

Common

Chinese Cobra

Naja atra

Catchwater near Ngau Kwo Tin

Listed on Appendix II of CITES and regarded as vulnerable in China Red Data Book

Common and widespread in Hong Kong

Common

Indo-Chinese Rat Snake

Ptyas korros

Catchwater in Keung Shan

Listed as endangered in the China Red Data Book

Common and widespread in Hong Kong

Common

Marbled Eel

Anguilla marmorata

Upper and lower sections of Tai O main stream

Listed as endangered in the China Red Data Book, Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC

Widely distributed in Asia including South and Southeast Asia

Common

-

Yaoshanicus arcus

Lower Keung Shan, upper and lower sections of Tai O main stream.

Not protected

North-west Lantau and north-east and east New Territories

Restricted to South China and northern Vietnam but locally common

Horseshoe Crab

Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda; Tachypleus tridentatus

Tai O Bay

Not protected

In Hong Kong, mainly in the western waters.

Local population declining.

 

Summary


8.4.1 Based on the ecological conditions presented in the above sections, it is considered that the mangrove/marsh and freshwater stream have high ecological value. The woodland, fish pond and plantation within Ngong Ping SSSI are regarded to have moderate ecological value, while cultivated lands, grass-shrubland and urbanised area considered of low ecological value. For the two marine habitats, intertidal habitat is considered of low ecological value and benthic habitat is considered as moderate. Most of the recorded species are common and widespread in Hong Kong. However, some rare/protected/endangered flora and fauna species were recorded within the Study Area.

8.4.2 Some species of conservation importance were reported in the literature reviewed.

8.5 Impact Identification and Assessment


8.5.1 Evaluation of ecological impacts is based on the following criteria described in Annex 8 of the Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process:

Habitat quality;


Species;

Size/abundance;

Duration of potential impact; and

Magnitude of potential impact

8.5.2 The primary EIA requirement is for compilation and analysis of data, followed by assessment of impacts using TM guidelines. Impacts are assessed with reference to Annexes 8 and 16 of the Technical Memorandum of the EIA Ordinance. Discrete project impacts and cumulative impacts are assessed, mitigation plans developed to reduce impacts to acceptable levels, and ecological monitoring and audit programmes specified as needed.

Construction Stage

Site Formation

8.5.3 The construction of the sewage treatment works and sewerage/the effluent pipelines would cause a temporary loss of 0.13 ha of plantation, 0.17 ha of grass-shrubland, 0.94 ha of urbanised/disturbed habitats and a permanent loss of 0.01 ha of plantation, 0.11 ha of grass-shrubland, and 2.01 urbanised/disturbed habitat (Table 8.28). The sewage treatment works will be built on urbanised/disturbed area and the sewerage will follow the existing road. As the proposed discharge point is located at the mouth of Tai O Creek, no dredging or reclamation is required for the proposed project.Drawing No. 23400/EN/086, 87, 88, 89, 90 and 091 shows the land requirements for the Project. Due to the limited area and ecological importance of habitats to be lost, the impact is considered minor. Most of the project components avoid identified sensitive habitats or biota. No habitat of ecological importance would be lost to the project. Species of ecological importance recorded during field surveys or reported in reviewed literature would not be affected. No additional species or habitat of conservation concern were recorded during the supplementary ecological surveys; therefore the results of supplementary ecological surveys does not affect the conclusion of the impact assessment.

 

Table 8.28 Potential loss of habitat (ha) to the sewage treatment work and sewerage alignment

Habitat Type

Sewage treatment work + Flow Monitoring Chamber

Sewerage alignment + Temporary works area

Temporary loss

Plantation

-

0.13

Grass-Shrubland

-

0.17

Urbanised/Disturbed

-

0.94

Permanent Loss

Plantation

0.01

-*

Grass-Shrubland

0.11

-

Urbanised/Disturbed

2.01

-*

 

* sewerage pipeline will be underground

 

Noise and Disturbance


8.5.4 Noise and visual disturbance may be occur during site formation and construction, potentially affecting the distribution and behaviour of fauna of the adjacent habitats. Due to the temporary and localised nature of the disturbance, potential impacts to fauna from this source are ranked as minor.

8.5.5 The proposed sewage treatment works would be located in the vicinity of Lantau North Country Park, and a few sections of the proposed effluent pipeline would encroach upon Lantau North Country Park and Ngong Ping SSSI (Drawing No. 23400/EN/067a). Construction of these facilities may have negative short-term ecological impacts on these areas. The impact, however, is minor since the affected area would be mainly confined to constructed road and temporary in nature.

 

8.5.6 Some of the plant species of conservation interest lie very close to the proposed effluent alignment. However, due to the localised nature of disturbance of this project, the potential impacts to these plant species is anticipated to be minor. No protective measures for the protected plant species are required.

Surface Runoff

8.5.7 Potential impacts to aquatic ecology during the construction phase would mainly arise from sedimentation due to surface runoff. Elevated suspended solids levels caused by site runoff could increase the suspended solids load in the water bodies, and could decrease dissolved oxygen levels. A lower oxygen level would affect stationary species, whilst mobile species would tend to temporarily avoid the area. The result could be a temporary reduction in aquatic life abundance.

8.5.8 Runoff should not be discharged into streams or marine water. Site runoff should be desilted, to reduce the potential for suspended sediments, organics and other contaminants to enter stream and marine environment. Cautions must be taken to avoid runoff from entering the streams in the crossings of sewer and natural streams. Special attention should be paid to the stream in which Romer's Tree Frog has been observed breeding (Drawing No. 23400/EN/067a). It is recommended that earthworks near this stream should not be carried out during the breeding season of Romer's Tree Frog (March to September).

Summary of Construction Impacts


8.5.9 Potential impacts of project construction are summarised in Table 8.29.

Table 8.29 Construction-stage Impacts.

Activity

Receiver

Potential Impacts

Nature of Impacts

Severity

Mitigation Recommended

Site formation

Habitats and species associated (urbanised/disturbed/wasteland)

Total loss of flora and habitats within site formation boundary,

Loss of habitats for fauna

Permanent, irreversible, small scale, limited species affected

Minor

No

Noise and disturbance

Sensitive wildlife species on adjacent habitats

Inhibition of vegetation growth Changes in distribution, activity patterns

Temporary, reversible, small scale, limited species affected

Minor

No

Surface runoff

Marine and stream fauna

Changes in distribution, and/or activity patterns of associated fauna

Reversible, small scale, limited species affected

Minor to moderate

Yes

Prevention of runoff to streams and marine habitats, desilt runoff

 

Operation Stage


8.5.10 Machinery noise and odour of sewage from the sewage treatment work may cause changes in distribution pattern of some fauna. However, the impact is minor as the remaining fauna in the Study Area are disturbance tolerant.

8.5.11 Operational phase impacts would arise from discharge of treated effluent. The pollution loading of the treated effluent would however be small as compared to the background pollution loading, and the potential impacts on the water quality would be localized. No adverse impacts are predicted.

8.5.12 According to the water quality assessment result (Section 5 of this report), the operation-phase water quality at the existing mangroves and the location close the future mangrove planting area would fulfil the WQO. The UIA and TIN level would be below 0.0074 mg/L and 0.3679 mg/L respectively which fully complied with the WQO. Relatively higher E. coli concentrations were predicted at the existing mangroves in Tai O creek with average values of 6729 and 3397 count/100ml for dry and wet season respectively. The high E. coli levels were however contributed by the pollution input from existing unsewered developments. As detailed in Section 5, the existing mangroves currently receive a considerable amount of sewage discharges from unsewered developments. The natural pollution tolerance displayed by mangroves is well documented. Recent studies of mangals in Hong Kong and the Futian Nature Reserve in Shenzhen firmly conclude that mangroves would not be adversely affected by high pollution loads including concentrated sewage effluent. So it is not anticipated that the additional input from the Ngong Ping STW would cause any adverse impact on the existing mangroves at Tai O Creek or on the future mangrove planting site at the salt pans.

Summary of Operation Impacts


8.5.13 Potential impacts of project operation are summarised in Table 8.30.

Table 8.30 Operation-stage Impacts.

Activity

Receiver

Potential Impacts

Nature of Impacts

Severity

Mitigation Recommended

Changes in water quality in North Western WCZ

Marine ecosystems

Changes of nutrient levels in sea water

Long-term

Minor

No

Changes in water quality in North Western Supplementary WCZ

Marine ecosystems

Changes of nutrient levels in sea water

Long-term

Minor

No

Machinery noise and odour

Terrestrial fauna

Changes in distribution and activity patterns of fauna

Permanent, irreversible, small scale, limited species affected

Minor

No

 

Cumulative Impacts


8.5.14 Currently there is no other major project proposed in the areas along the sewer alignment. No cumulative impacts on terrestrial ecology would arise. For marine ecology, the future Tai O Boat Anchorage would involve dredging during construction. However, no cumulative impacts would result from these two projects as no intertidal or marine works would be required in the present project, and the Boat Anchorage project will be commissioned before the construction of the present project according to the current schedule. The Water Quality Assessment has taken into account the boat anchorage project, and indicated that this would not produce significant cumulative impacts.

8.6 Mitigation Measures


8.6.1 The TM (Annex 16) and the TC require that mitigation of ecological impacts be sought in the following order of priority: (1) avoid, (2) minimise, (3) compensate on-site and (4) compensate off-site. At each stage, residual impacts should be re-assessed to determine whether there is a need to proceed to the next stage of mitigation. The following measures are proposed to mitigate the impacts discussed in the preceding section.

Construction Stage


8.6.2 Measures should be taken to avoid runoff to streams and estuary. Site runoff should be desilted, to reduce the potential for suspended sediments, organics and other contaminants to enter the local freshwater or marine environment.


Operational Stage


8.6.3 No ecological mitigation measures are required. Net loss of a small area of wasteland and urbanised areas of little ecological importance will be the only residual impact, this is not predicted to be significant. It is also anticipated that this project will not impose any impact in addition to those arising from the Tai O Sheltered Boat Anchorage Project and the proposed cable car terminal at Ngong Ping.

8.7 Residual Impacts


8.7.1 No residual impacts would be anticipated if the mitigation measures suggested above are implemented.

8.8 Conclusions


8.8.1 Limited impacts on terrestrial and marine ecology were predicted from the construction of the sewage treatment work, sewer alignment, and the outfall. Provided that good practice for controlling surface runoff is employed and enforced, and earthworks can be suspended for the section of sewer close the stream where the Romer's Tree Frog was found during the breeding season of the frog (March to September), no residual impacts are anticipated.

8.8.2 During operational stage, the water quality in the water bodies in Ngong Ping is expected to improve as the project collects and treats raw sewage. The high level of treatment would prevent any adverse impacts to the Tai O Bay.

8.9 Literature Cited


Ades, G.W.J. 1999. The species composition, distribution and population size of Hong Kong bats. Memoirs of Hong Kong Natural History Society 22:183-209.


Bascombe, M.J., Johnston, G. and Bascombe, F.S. 1999. The Butterflies of Hong Kong. Academic Press, United Kingdom.


Carey, G. 1996. Hong Kong Bird Report 1995. Hong Kong Birdwatching Society, Hong Kong.


Carey, G. 1998. Hong Kong Bird Report 1996. Hong Kong Birdwatching Society, Hong Kong.


Carey, G. and Tai, S.L. 1999. Hong Kong Bird Report 1997. Hong Kong Birdwatching Society, Hong Kong.

Carey, G.J., Chalmers, M.L., Diskin, D.A., Kennerley, P.R., Leader, P.J., Leven, M.R., Lewthwaite, R.W., Melville, D.S., Turnbull, M. and Young, L. 2001. The Avifauna of Hong Kong. Hong Kong Bird Watching Society, Hong Kong.

Chiu, H.M.C and Morton, B. 1999. The Biology, Distribution, and Status of Horseshoe Crabs, Tachypleus tridentatus and Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda (Arthropoda: Chelicerata) in Hong Kong: Recommendations for Conservation and Management. Final report to China Light Power Company Limited.Chong, D. and Dudgeon, D. 1992. Hong Kong stream fishes: an annotated checklist with remarks on conservation status. Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society 19: 79-112.

 

Chong, D. and Dudgeon, D. 1992. Hong Kong stream fishes: an annotated checklist with remarks on conservation status. Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society 19: 79-112.

Chou, I. 1997. Monographia Rhopalocerorum Sinensium. Henan Scientific and Technological Publishing House.

Dudgeon, D. and Corlett, R. 1994. Hills and Streams: An Ecology of Hong Kong. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong.

Dudgeon, D. and Chan E.W.C. 1996. Ecological Study of Freshwater Wetland Habitats in Hong Kong. Prepared for Agriculture and fisheries Department, Hong Kong Government.

Ecosystems Ltd. 1999. Agreement No. CE 41/98. Environmental and Drainage Impact Assessment for Tai O Sheltered Boat Anchorage - Ecology and Fisheries Surveys. Prepared for Scott Wilson (Hong Kong) Ltd.

ERM. 2000. Agreement Number CE 59/98. Study on Revitalisation of Tai O: Technical Report 7. Prepared for Planning Department.

Green Lantau Association, The Conservancy Association, Friends of the Earth, Green Power, HK Marine Conservation Society, World Fund for Nature HK. 1998. A Conservation Strategy for Lantau.

Huang, Q., H. Chiu and B. Morton. 1998. Nursery beaches for horseshoe crabs in Hong Kong. Porcupine! 18 (Dec. 1998): 9-10. (Newsletter of the Department of Ecology & Biodiversity, University of Hong Kong.)

Karsen, S.J., Lau, M.W.N. and Bogadek, A. 1998. Hong Kong Amphibians and Reptiles. Second Edition. Provisional Urban Council, Hong Kong.

Kolby, J. and Lazell, J. 2001. Amazing snake. Porcupine! 22:9-10.

Kwok, H.K., Wong, L.C. and Carey, G.J. 2001. Egretry counts in Hong Kong, with particular reference to the Mai Po and Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site - Summer 2000 report. The Hong Kong Bird Watching Society, Hong Kong.

Kwok, H.K. and Dahmer, T.D. 2002. Habitat Utilization by Little Egrets Egretta garzetta Breeding at Tai O Egretry. Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society 25: 95-104.

Kwok, H. K. and Dahmer, T. D. (in press). Bird community of a fire-maintained grassland in Hong Kong. Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society.

Landsdown, R.V., Mundkur, T. and Young, L. 2000. Herons in East and South-east Asia. pp 73-98, in (J. A. Kushlan and H. Hafner). Heron Conservation. Academic Press, San Diego.

Lau, M. 1996. Wildlife Windows Two. Porcupine! 14:15.

Lau, P. 1997. Butterflies of Hong Kong. Brilliant Printing Company, Hong Kong.

Lau, M.W.N. 1998. Habitat Use by Hong Kong Amphibians, with Special Reference to the Ecology and

Conservation of Philautus romeri. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Lau, M.W.N. and Dudgeon, D. 1999. Composition and distribution of Hong Kong amphibian fauna. Memoirs of Hong Kong Natural History Society 22:1-79.

Lazell, J. 1996. Prizes of plunder ñ Hong Kong herpetological highlights. Porcupine! 15:12.

Mott MacDonald Hong Kong Ltd., Shankland Cox, Wilbur Smith Associates and EBC Hong Kong. 1991. North Lantau Developent: Tropic Report TR 10 - Environmental Assessment (Revised). Prepared for Territory

 

Development Department, South West NT Development Office.

Preston-Mafham, R. and Preston-Mafham, K. 1988. Butterflies of the World. Blendford Press, London.

Reels, G. 1996. Distribution of large mammals in Hong Kong. Porcupine! 15:36-38.

Romer, J.D. 1961. Annotated checklist with keys to the snakes of Hong Kong. Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society 5:1-17.

Romer, J.D. 1975. Annotated checklist with keys to the lizards of Hong Kong. Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society 10:1-13.


Scott Wilson (Hong Kong) Limited. 2000. Agreement No. CE 41/98 Tai O Sheltered Boat Anchorage Environmental and Drainage Impact Assessment. Final Assessment Report. Prepared for Civil Engineering Department. May 2000.

Siu, G.L.P. 2000. Orchidaceae of Hong Kong. Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society. 23: 137-148.

Viney, C., Phillipps, K. and Lam, C.Y. 1996. Birds of Hong Kong and South China. Government Printer, Hong Kong.

Walthew, G. 1997. The status and flight periods of Hong Kong butterflies. Porcupine! No. 16: 34-37.

Wang, S. 1998. China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals. Mammalia. Science Press, Beijing.

Wilson, K.D.P. 1995. Hong Kong Dragonflies. Urban Council, Hong Kong.

Wilson, K.D.P. 1997. An annotated checklist of the Hong Kong dragonflies with recommendations for their conservation. Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society No. 21: 1-68.

Wilson D.E. and D. M. Reeder. 1992. Mammal species of the world: A taxonomic and geographic reference. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington & London.

Wong, L.C., Kwok, H.K. and Carey, G.J. 2000. Egretry counts in Hong Kong, with particular reference to the Mai Po and Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site – Summer 1999 report. The Hong Kong Bird Watching Society, Hong Kong.

Wong, L.C. and Kwok, H.K. 2002. Egretry counts in Hong Kong, with particular reference to the Mai Po and Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site – Summer 2001 report. The Hong Kong Bird Watching Society, Hong Kong.

Wu, X.F. 1988. Butterflies of the Ling-nan Oasis. Academic Periodical Press, Beijing.

Xing, F.W., Ng, S.C., Chau, L.K.C. 2000. Gymnosperms and angiosperms of Hong Kong. Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society. 23: 21-136.

Xu, W.S. 1995. Raptors of China. China Forestry Publishing House. Beijing.

Young, L. and Cha, M.W. 1995. The history and status of egretries in Hong Kong with notes on those in the Pearl River delta, Guangdong, China. Hong Kong Bird Report 1994: 196-215.

Yue, P. and Chen, Y. 1998. China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals: Pisces. Beijing: Science Press.

Zhao, E.M. and Adler, K. 1993. Herpetology of China. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Oxford, Ohio.

Zhao, E. 1998. China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals. Amphibia & Reptilia. Science Press, Beijing.

Zheng, G.M. and Wang, Q.S. 1998. China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals: Aves. Science Press, Beijing.