This report is prepared by ERM-Hong Kong, Ltd (ERM)
in accordance with the EIA Study Brief
(No. ESB-126/2005) and the Technical Memorandum of the Environmental Impact Assessment Process
(EIAO-TM).
The detailed requirements of this EIA study are set
out in the EIA Study Brief and
summarised in Part 1 of this EIA Report. This Part of the EIA Report addresses the key environmental issues
associated with the construction and operation of the
1.3.1
Proposed Project Site at
Should the
The
1.3.2
Description and Historical Background of
the
1963
By reviewing the aerial photographs of the
early 1960’s (D3F400 dated 1963, Figure 1.2), settlements were concentrated in Ha Tsuen and Sheung Tsuen with approximately 50 households. During this period terrace cultivation was
evident and extensive on
1986
Before the construction of a Detention
Centre in the late 1980’s, the number of households in Ha Tsuen
and Sheung Tsuen reduced to
approximately 20 (Aerial Photograph 1986,
Figure 1.3). The
agricultural lands located near Sheung Tsuen were modified into a small reservoir lined with a
concrete bund. Most of the agricultural
lands were either abandoned and covered by grasses and shrubs or modified into
livestock farms.
1989
Construction of the Detention Centre
commenced in 1989 and was completed in 1991 (Aerial photograph 1989, Figure
1.4). The photograph presents the extent of the
works areas during land formation for the Detention Centre facilities in the
middle of the
1994
During the early 1990s the Detention Centre
was operational and an aerial photograph from 1994 (Figure
1.5)
presents the areas on the island that were used during this period. It is noticeable from the photographs that
the Detention Centre operations covered large portions of the
The Detention Centre occupied the flat
land in between Tung Wan and Sai Wan and reclaimed
some shoreline of both bays. The
hillsides at the south of the Detention Centre were modified into cut slopes
and all the vegetation above was removed.
A cemented path was constructed to link the Detention Centre to the top
of the hill, which was developed as a helipad.
All of the constructed areas around the helipad were hydroseeded
to form grassland. The reservoir was
used for water storage and with plantation of trees around the fringes of the
reservoir. The natural shoreline of Sai Wan was modified into an artificial shore with piers
constructed at the north and south edges of Sai
Wan. The natural shoreline of Tung Wan
was also modified into artificial shore with rocks and boulders. All of the agricultural lands have been
abandoned since this period.
Present Condition
Before 1997, the Detention Centre was
cleared and all the building structures were demolished and abandoned as
wasteland. The island is presently
abandoned with no inhabitants (aerial photograph 2004, Figure
1.6). The concrete paths and the remaining
structures of the development have, over time, become covered by climbers and
grasses.
The marine waters around the
1.4
Scoping of
Environmental Issues
The potential environmental
impacts which may arise from the construction and operation of the terminal and
associated facilities were identified and discussed in the Project Profile for
this EIA. The specific scope for the EIA
of the
Following
this introductory section, the remainder of this Section is arranged as follows:
Section
2 |
This section of the EIA report presents
the findings of assessments conducted by ERM on behalf of CAPCO in
considering alternative layout and design options for the LNG terminal at |
Section
3 |
Provides a
description of the Project highlighting the key infrastructure to be
constructed, the timeline for implementing the Project and the operational
activities. This section forms the
basis of the technical assessments presented in Sections 4 – 14 below. |
Section 4 |
Presents
details of an assessment of impacts from the construction and operation of
the LNG terminal to air quality sensitive receivers. |
Section 5 |
Presents
details of an assessment of impacts from the construction and operation of
the LNG terminal to noise sensitive receivers. |
Section 6 |
Details the
assessment of impacts to water quality sensitive receivers arising from the
construction and operation of the LNG terminal. |
Section 7 |
Presents the waste
management implications from construction and operation of the LNG
terminal. |
Section 8 |
Details the
assessment of impacts to terrestrial ecological resources arising from the
construction and operation of the LNG terminal. |
Section 9 |
Presents
details of an assessment of impacts from the construction and operation of
the LNG terminal to marine ecological resources. |
Section 10 |
Details the
assessment of impacts to fisheries resources and fishing operations arising
from the construction and operation of the LNG terminal. |
Section 11 |
Presents the details of an assessment of impacts
from the construction and operation of the LNG terminal to landscape and
visual sensitive receivers. |
Section 12 |
Details the assessment of impacts from the
construction and operation of the LNG terminal to cultural heritage
resources. |
Section 13 |
Presents the quantitative risk assessment from the
operation of the LNG terminal. |
Section 14 |
Describes the measures that are to be adopted in
the operational phase of the LNG terminal to prevent land contamination. |
Section 15 |
Presents a summary of the environmental outcomes of
the EIA of the |
Section 16 |
Presents the environmental performance comparison
of the |
Section 17 |
Introduces a summary of the environmental
monitoring and audit (EM&A) measures for the Project. |
Section 18 |
Presents the conclusions of the EIA on the |