11.1.1.1
This section presents the Cultural Heritage
Impact Assessment (CHIA) for the construction and operation of the Project,
which has been conducted in accordance with the criteria and guidelines as
stated in Annexes 10 and 19 of the Technical Memorandum on Environmental
Impact Assessment Process (EIAO-TM) as well as the requirements given in
Clause 3.4.13 and Appendix K of the EIA Study Brief (No. ESB-320/2019). Appropriate
mitigation measures are recommended as necessary.
·
Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance (A&MO)
(Cap.53)
·
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO)
(Cap.499) and Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process
(EIAO-TM)
·
Guidance Note on Assessment of Impact on Sites
of Cultural Heritage in Environmental Impact Assessment Studies
·
Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines
(HKPSG)
·
Guidelines for Cultural Heritage Impact
Assessment (GCHIA)
Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance (A&MO)
(Cap.53)
11.2.1.2
The Ordinance provides the statutory
framework for the preservation of objects of historical, archaeological and
palaeontological interest and for matters ancillary thereto or connected
therewith. The Ordinance contains
the statutory procedures for the Declaration of Monuments. Under the Ordinance, a “monument”
means a place, building, site or structure which is declared to be a monument,
historical building or archaeological or paleontological site or structure
under Section 3 of the Ordinance.
Environmental
Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) and EIAO-TM Annexes 10, 18 and 19
11.2.1.3
The EIAO was implemented on 1 April 1998. It aims to avoid, minimise and control the
adverse impacts on the environment of designated projects, through the EIA
process and the Environmental Permit (EP) system.
11.2.1.4
Annexes 10 and 19 of EIAO-TM provide general
criteria and guidelines for evaluating the impacts to sites of cultural heritage. It is stated in Annex 10 that all adverse
impacts to Sites of Cultural Heritage shall be kept to an absolute minimum and
that the general presumption of impact assessment shall be in favour of the
protection and conservation of all Sites of Cultural Heritage. Annexes 19 provides the scope and methodology
for undertaking Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment, including baseline study,
impact assessment and mitigation measures.
Annex 18 describes the methodology for assessment of landscape and visual
impacts. Historic landscapes, sites or
buildings of culture heritage are landscape features that may contribute to the
landscape character of a site, which shall be considered when assessing impacts
on landscape elements.
Guidance
Note on Assessment of Impact on Sites of Cultural Heritage in Environmental
Impact Assessment Studies
11.2.1.5 The
Guidance Note assists the understanding of the requirements of the EIAO-TM
in assessing impact on sites of cultural heritage in EIA studies
Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines (HKPSG)
11.2.1.6
Chapter 10 of HKPSG covers planning
considerations relevant to conservation.
It also details the principles of conservation, the conservation of
natural landscape and habitats, declared monuments, historic buildings, sites
of archaeological interest and other heritage items, and addresses the issue of
enforcement. The appendices list the
legislation and administrative controls for conservation, other conservation
related measures in Hong Kong, and Government departments involved in
conservation.
Guidelines
for Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment (GCHIA)
11.2.1.7
The document outlines the technical requirements
for conducting terrestrial built heritage and archaeological impact
assessments. A comprehensive CHIA
comprises of a baseline study including both desk-top research and field
evaluation, an impact assessment associated with appropriate mitigation
measures. The evaluation of impacts
based upon five levels of significance, including beneficial impact, acceptable
impact, acceptable impact with mitigation measures, unacceptable impact and
undetermined impact.
11.3.1
General
11.3.1.1
The CHIA is carried out in accordance with
GCHIA, the requirements as stated in Annexes 10, 18 and 19 of the EIAO-TM
and the EIA Study Brief, as well as considerations in other relevant
guidelines. The assessment methodology
for archaeological and built heritage impact assessments is described in the
following sections.
11.3.2
Assessment Area for this Cultural Heritage
Impact Assessment
11.3.2.1
The assessment area for the CHIA of this EIA
Study covers the area within 300 m from the Project boundary as illustrated in Figure 11.1.
11.3.3.1 A desktop
review has been conducted to identify any built
heritage resources based on examination on the following resources:
·
List of Proposed and Declared Monuments;
·
List of the 1,444 Historic Buildings;
·
List of new items for grading assessment;
·
Government Historic Sites;
·
Previous related EIA studies, publications and
monographs on relevant historical and geographical issues;
·
Unpublished archival papers and records, and
collection and libraries of tertiary institutions; and
·
Geological and historical maps, aerial photos
and relevant visual archives.
11.3.3.2 Site
visits have been conducted in the assessment area on 26 August 2020, 28
December 2020, 6 January 2021 and 27 January 2021, to evaluate the current
condition of the built heritage resources and identify any additional built
heritage resources that have not been covered by the desktop review. The results are recorded in Appendix 11.2.
11.3.3.3 The
potential direct and indirect impacts that may affect the built heritages were
assessed by following the procedures and requirements of GCHIA and Annexes 10
and 19 of the EIAO-TM. The potential
impacts are classified into five levels of significance in accordance
to GCHIA:
a)
Beneficial impact: the impact is beneficial
if the Project will enhance the preservation of the heritage site(s);
b)
Acceptable impact: if the assessment indicates
that there will be no significant effects on the heritage site(s);
c)
Acceptable impact with mitigation measures: if
there will be some adverse effects, but these can be eliminated, reduced or
offset to a large extent by specific measures, such as conducting a
follow-up Conservation Proposal or Conservation Management Plan for the affected
heritage site(s) before the commencement of work in order to avoid any
inappropriate and unnecessary interventions to the buildings;
d)
Unacceptable impact: if the adverse effects are
considered to be too excessive and are unable to mitigate practically; and
e)
Undetermined impact: if the significant
adverse effects are likely, but the extent to which they may occur or may be
mitigated cannot be determined from the HIA Study. Further detailed study will be required for
the specific effects in question.
11.3.4 Assessment
of impacts on cultural heritage shall also take full account of, and allow
where appropriate, the Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment of
Annex 18 of the EIAO-TM in accordance with the EIA Study Brief (No.
ESB-320/2019).
11.3.5 Mitigation
measures are proposed in the CHIA for all affected built heritage resources to
minimise any adverse impacts when necessary.
11.3.6 Archaeology
11.3.6.1 A
desktop review has been conducted to identify any potential
existence of archaeological resources based on examination on the following
resources:
·
List of Sites of Archaeological Interest;
·
Previous
related EIA studies and archaeological reports;
·
Related
publications and monographs on relevant archaeological, historical and
geographical issues;
·
Unpublished
archival papers and records, and collection and libraries of tertiary
institutions; and
·
Geological
and historical maps, aerial photos and relevant visual archives.
11.3.6.2
The potential impacts that may affect the
possible archaeological resources during the construction and operational
phases are assessed in the CHIA by following the procedures and requirements of
GCHIA and Annexes 10 and 19 of the TM.
11.3.6.3
In case adverse impacts on archaeological
resources cannot be avoided, appropriate mitigation measures were designed and
recommended in this CHIA to minimise the impacts.
11.4.1
Geological Background
11.4.1.1
Tai Wai Nullah is located at Sha Tin
valley. Needle Hill is located to the
northwest of Tai Wai Nullah. Lower Shing
Mun Reservoir is located to the west of Tai Wai Nullah. To Fung Shan is located to the north of Tai
Wai Nullah. The nullah discharges into
Shing Mun River which flows into Tide Cove (also known as “Sha Tin Hoi”).
11.4.1.2
The assessment area is mainly formed of coarse-grained
biotite granite (“Jkt_gc” as shown in Figure 11.3). The superficial deposits in the assessment
area generally include colluvium (“Qd” and “Qcd” as shown in Figure 11.3) on
the hilly ground and alluvium (“Qfa” as shown in Figure 11.3) in
the main valley.
11.4.1.3
The Project site was once part of the natural
watercourse flowing into Shing Mun River (Plate 1 in Appendix 11.1). Due to the development Sha Tin New Town in
1970s, the coast of Tide Cove was largely reclaimed and Shing Mun River was
channelised and extended. The river at the Project site was also channelised
along with the Shing Mun River since 1970s and had turned into a concrete
nullah (Plate 2 in Appendix 11.1).
11.4.2
Historical Background
11.4.2.1
Clues of human settlements in Hong Kong region
can be found in historic textual records such as Lushi
Chunqiu and Hanshu written
in the first century BC to first century AD.
These records describe that Yue ethnic groups scattered in south
China. During Qin dynasty (211-206BC),
the region was subordinated to Panyu County. And later Hong Kong region had been
subordinated to Xin’an County since AD1573
until AD1912 Xin’an was renamed to Bao’an County.
11.4.2.2
Since the 9th century onwards, Pearl
River delta was an important salt production centre. Hong Kong was one of the salt production
centres in Southern Song dynasty (AD1127-1279).
Historic textual records Yudi Jisheng and Songhuiyao
Jilu describe smuggling related to salt
production. Five major clans including
the Pangs, Lius, Haus, Mans and Tangs, settled in the
New Territories since the Southern Song dynasty. Village settlements in Sha Tin can be dated
no later than Wanli reign of the Ming
dynasty. During Ming dynasty, Sha Tin
was famous for production of fragrant wood as recorded in Xin’an Gazetteer.
11.4.2.3
In 1661, the Coastal Evacuation Order was
implemented by the Qing government.
People lived in the coastal area of Guangdong including the New
Territories, were forced to move 25km inland.
People were allowed to move back to the New Territories in 1684 but the
coastal population severely dropped.
Thus, Hakka people were encouraged to move to the New Territories in the
late 17th century. They developed
villages at the hillside and practiced agriculture. Sha Tin Kau Yeuk
(“Alliance of Nine Districts”) was founded in late Qing dynasty. The alliance built the Che Kung Temple in Sha
Tin to commemorate Che Kung, who pacified the plague that killed many Sha Tin
people at that time.
11.4.2.4
The villages of Sha Tin Kau Yeuk in vicinity of the Project include Chik Chuen Wai (also known as Tai
Wai) of Tai Wai Yeuk, Tung Lo Wan of Pai
Tau Yeuk, San Tin of Tin Sam Yeuk. Chik Chuen Wai was said to be built in the 2nd year
of Wanli (1574), which is a village of multi
surnames with Wai as the majority. The
villagers worship Yeung Hau at the Hau Wong Temple inside the village. Tung Lo Wan is a Hakka village of multiple
surnames, including the Yau and Tse clans. The Tse clan moved
to Hong Kong 1850s during the Taiping Rebellion. They settled in Daam
Hon Po and then moved Tung Lo Wan in the early 20th century. Moreover, San Tin is a single-clan Hakka
village of the Laus.
The Lau clan moved from Huizhou to Au Pui Wan
Tsuen in Fo Tan and gradually moved to Kek Tin, Tin
Sam and San Tin when their population increased. San Tin Village was established in the late
1890s.
11.4.2.5
During the post-war period, population increases
rapidly due to the immigration from the Mainland and post-war baby booms. To alleviate the crowding problems in the urban
areas, the Public Works Department (predecessor of the Development Bureau)
prepared a comprehensive development scheme to propose the development of a new
town in Sha Tin in 1965. With the
large-scale reclamation along Tide Cove and Shing Mun River since the early
1970s, Sha Tin was developed into a new town with population over 500,000.
11.5.1
Built Heritage
11.5.1.1
Ten built heritage resources are located within
300 m from the Project site, including one Grade 1 Historic Building, three
Grade 2 Historic Buildings, five Grade 3 Historic Buildings, one new item
pending for grading assessment. Their
locations are presented on Figure
11.1.
11.5.1.2
A Declared Monument, the Old House, Wong Uk Village, is located within 300 m from the discharge area
of Tai Wai Nullah, and it is located about 1.8km from the Project boundary (Figure 11.2).
11.5.1.3
The identified built heritage resources are
summarised in Table 11.1 and the details of the
identified built heritage resources are presented in Appendix 11.2.
Table 11.1 Summary
of Cultural Heritage Resources
|
Cultural Heritage
|
Historic Building Grading
|
Approximate Horizontal Distance from the Project
Boundary
|
|
Gatehouse of Pok Ngar Villa
|
New item pending for grading assessment
|
Within the Project boundary
|
|
Li Cottage
|
Grade 1
|
47 m
|
|
No. 1 First Street, Tai
Wai
|
Grade 3
|
65 m
|
|
No. 2 First Street, Tai
Wai
|
Grade 3
|
|
No. 3 First Street, Tai
Wai
|
Grade 3
|
|
Entrance Gate, Chik Chuen Wai
|
Grade 2
|
96 m
|
|
Che Kung Temple (Sha Tin)
|
Grade 2
|
137 m
|
|
Lower Shing Mun Reservoir,
Dam
|
Grade 3
|
143 m
|
|
Lower Shing Mun Reservoir,
Weir
|
Grade 2
|
150 m
|
|
Lower Shing Mun Reservoir,
Supply Basin
|
Grade 3
|
155 m
|
|
Old House, Wong Uk Village
|
Declared Monument
|
1.8 km from the Project boundary; within 300 m of the discharge area of
Tai Wai Nullah
|
11.5.2
Archaeology
11.5.2.1
No Site of Archaeological Interest (SAI) is
identified within 300m from the Project boundary.
11.5.2.2
The Project site is located at the current Tai
Wai Nullah, which was once part of the natural watercourse of Shing Mun
River. According to the topographic maps
of 1956 to 1958 (Figure 11.4),
Shing Mun River was mainly a natural watercourse with signs of basic
channelisation in between Pak Tin and Tai Wai.
Due to the development Sha Tin New Town in the 1970s, the river
was significantly channelised and extended in the 1970s and had turned into a concrete nullah
(Plate 2 in Appendix
11.1). Any archaeological deposits in the Project
site would have been either destroyed by the river channelisation or
non-existent due to its location at the watercourse. Therefore, no archaeological potential would
be anticipated within the Project site.
11.5.2.3
Furthermore, historical villages in Tai Wai,
including Chik Chuen Wai,
Tung Lo Wan and San Tin, are located away from the Project site and remain
intact from construction (see Tai Wai, Tung Lo Wan and San Tin Tsuen in Figure 11.4). The Project would not encroach on these
historical villages that might have archaeological potentials due to antiquity.
Built Heritage
11.6.1.1
As the proposed works are mostly situated within
the nullah and there is a substantial separation distance between the Old
House, Wong Uk Village (Declared Monument) and the
proposed works, no direct and indirect impact would be anticipated for the Old
House, Wong Uk Village (Declared Monument) during the
construction phase.
11.6.1.2
Gatehouse of Pok Ngar Villa (new item pending for grading assessment) is
located within Project site. Direct
impacts due to damages through contacting with construction machineries and
site negligence by enhancement of existing walkways, landscaping and utility
works or channel bed modifications, might be anticipated for Gatehouse of Pok Ngar Villa.
11.6.1.3
Gatehouse of Pok Ngar Villa (new item pending for grading assessment), Li Cottage (Grade 1), Nos. 1-3 First Street, Tai Wai
(Grade 3) and Entrance Gate, Chik Chuen Wai (Grade 2) are located within 100m from the
Project boundary. Due to the close
proximity from the construction works, indirect impacts of ground-borne
vibration would be anticipated from the Project during construction phase.
·
Che Kung Temple (Sha Tin) (Grade 2);
·
Lower
Shing Mun Reservoir, Dam (Grade 3);
·
Lower Shing Mun Reservoir, Weir (Grade 2); and
·
Lower Shing Mun Reservoir, Supply Basin (Grade
3).
Archaeology
11.6.1.5
As no archaeological potential exists within the
Project boundary, and no SAI is identified within 300 m from the Project
boundary, no impact to archaeology would be anticipated during the construction
phase of the Project.
Built Heritage
11.6.2.1
The Project site is located along the current
Tai Wai Nullah. No significant
alteration of the current landscape which might affect the built heritage would
be expected. Therefore, no adverse
impact would be anticipated for built heritage during the operational phase.
Archaeology
11.6.2.1
As no archaeological potential exists within the
Project boundary, and no SAI is identified within 300m from the Project
boundary, no impact to archaeology would be anticipated during the operational
phase of the Project.
11.7.1 Construction
Phase
Built Heritage
11.7.1.1
Pre and post condition survey of Gatehouse of Pok Ngar Villa (new item pending for grading assessment), Li
Cottage (Grade 1), Nos. 1-3 First Street, Tai Wai (Grade 3) and Entrance Gate, Chik Chuen Wai (Grade 2) should
be conducted to inspect the buildings’ structural integrity and record the
buildings’ conditions by professional qualified building surveyor or
engineer before and after the construction works, respectively. The survey results shall be submitted to AMO
for record. Protective measures shall be
provided to the built heritage subject to the results of the pre-condition
survey. Post-condition survey should be
conducted after the construction works to identify any damages that have
occurred or caused by the construction.
If damages to these built heritage resources are identified, AMO shall
be informed immediately.
11.7.1.2
A buffer zone of 5 m from Gatehouse of Pok Ngar Villa (new item pending
for grading assessment) should be set up, in which no construction machineries
and construction storage should trespass the buffer zone. Fencing should also be set up to clearly
demarcate the buffer zone to avoid potential damage due to site negligence.
11.7.1.3
Monitoring of vibration, settlement and tilting
incorporated with a set of Alert, Alarm and Action (AAA) system shall be
employed for Gatehouse of Pok Ngar
Villa (new item pending for grading assessment), Li Cottage (Grade 1), Nos. 1-3
First Street, Tai Wai (Grade 3) and Entrance Gate, Chik
Chuen Wai (Grade 2) during the construction
phase. If the alert level is exceeded,
the monitoring frequency should be increased.
If the alarm level is exceeded, the design of the construction may need
to be amended. If the action level is
exceeded, all works should be stopped.
The proposed AAA limiting criteria are presented in Table 11.2.
The actual limiting criteria should be further agreed with the AMO. A monitoring proposal, including type of
monitoring, checkpoint locations, distribution of monitoring points,
installation details, frequency of monitoring and proposed actions to be
taken when reaching respective monitoring limits, should be submitted to AMO
for comments before commencement of the works.
Prior agreement and consent should be sought from the owner(s),
stakeholder(s) and relevant Government department(s) for the installation of
monitoring points before commencement of the works. Record of monitoring should be submitted
regularly to AMO during the construction.
AMO should be alerted in case any irregularities are observed.
Table 11.2 Proposed AAA Limiting Criteria for
Vibration, Settlement and Tilting Level Monitoring during Construction
|
Built
Heritages
|
Historic Building Grading
|
Alert, Alarm and Action (AAA) Values [1]
|
|
Vibration
|
Settlement
|
Tilting
|
|
Li Cottage
|
Grade 1
|
3 / 4 / 5 mm/s
|
6 / 8 / 10 mm
|
1/2000,
1/1500,
1/1000
|
|
Gatehouse of Pok
Ngar Villa
|
New item pending for grading assessment
|
5 / 6 / 7.5 mm/s
|
6 / 8 / 10 mm
|
1/2000,
1/1500,
1/1000
|
|
Nos. 1-3 First Street, Tai Wai
|
Grade 3
|
|
Entrance Gate, Chik
Chuen Wai
|
Grade 2
|
Note:
[1] Monitoring
criteria would be subjected to review upon updates of grading status of
heritage sites.
11.7.1.4
No mitigation measure would be required for the
following built heritages as no impact is anticipated:
·
Che Kung Temple (Sha Tin) (Grade 2);
·
Lower
Shing Mun Reservoir, Dam (Grade 3);
·
Lower Shing Mun Reservoir, Weir (Grade 2);
·
Lower Shing Mun Reservoir, Supply Basin (Grade
3); and
·
Old House, Wong Uk
Village (Declared Monument)
11.7.1.5
The assessment of impacts to the cultural
heritage resources from the Project during construction phase and proposed
mitigation measures are summarised in Table 11.3.
Table 11.3 Summary of Assessment of Impacts of
Cultural Heritage Resources andMitigation
Measures
|
Cultural Heritage
|
Impact
Assessment
|
Levels
of Significance of Impact
|
Mitigation
Measures
|
|
Gatehouse of Pok Ngar
Villa
|
Potential
direct impacts due to damages through contacting with construction
machineries and site negligence
would be anticipated.
Indirect impacts of ground-borne vibration, tilting and
settlement would be anticipated.
|
Acceptable impact with mitigation measures
|
Pre- and post-condition surveys.
A buffer zone of 5 m from Gatehouse of Pok Ngar Villa should be set
up, in which no construction machineries and construction storage should
trespass the buffer zone. Fencing should
also be set up to clearly demarcate the buffer zone.
Monitoring of vibration, settlement and
tilting incorporated with AAA system shall be employed. A monitoring proposal should be submitted
to AMO for comments before commencement of the works.
|
|
Li Cottage
|
Direct impacts would not be
anticipated. Indirect impacts of ground-borne vibration, tilting
and settlement would be anticipated.
|
Acceptable impact with mitigation measures
|
Pre- and post-condition surveys.
Monitoring of vibration, settlement and
tilting incorporated with AAA system shall be employed. A monitoring proposal should be submitted
to AMO for comments before commencement of the works.
|
|
No. 1 First Street, Tai Wai
|
|
No. 2 First Street, Tai Wai
|
|
No. 3 First Street, Tai Wai
|
|
Entrance Gate, Chik Chuen
Wai
|
|
Che Kung Temple (Sha Tin)
|
Located at a substantial distance from the
constructions, no impact would be anticipated.
|
No impact
|
No mitigation measure required
|
|
Lower Shing Mun Reservoir, Dam
|
|
Lower Shing Mun Reservoir, Weir
|
|
Lower Shing Mun Reservoir, Supply Basin
|
|
Old House, Wong Uk Village
|
Archaeology
11.7.1.6
No archaeological impact would be anticipated
during the construction phase.
Therefore, no mitigation measure would be required for archaeology during the construction phase.
11.7.2 Operation
Phase
Built Heritage
11.7.2.1
No adverse impact would be anticipated for built
heritage during the operational phase.
Therefore, no mitigation measure would be required for built heritage
during the operational phase.
Archaeology
11.7.2.2
No adverse impact would be anticipated for
archaeology during the operational phase.
Therefore, no mitigation measure would be required for archaeology
during the operational phase.
11.8
Environmental Monitoring and Audit
11.8.1 Construction
Phase
Built Heritage
11.8.1.1 Pre
and post condition survey of Gatehouse of Pok Ngar Villa (new item pending for grading assessment), Li
Cottage (Grade 1), Nos. 1-3 First Street, Tai Wai (Grade 3) and Entrance Gate, Chik Chuen Wai (Grade 2) shall be
carried out. The survey reports shall be
submitted to AMO for record.
11.8.1.2
A buffer zone of 5 m from Gatehouse of Pok Ngar Villa (new item pending
for grading assessment) should be set up, in which no construction machineries
and construction storage should trespass the buffer zone. Fencing should also be set up to clearly
demarcate the buffer zone to avoid potential damage due to site negligence.
11.8.1.3 Monitoring
of vibration, settlement and tilting incorporated with a set of AAA system
shall be employed for Gatehouse of Pok Ngar Villa (new item pending for grading assessment), Li
Cottage (Grade 1), Nos. 1-3 First Street, Tai Wai (Grade 3) and Entrance Gate, Chik Chuen Wai (Grade 2) during
the construction phase. The proposed AAA
limiting criteria are presented in Table 11.2. The actual limiting criteria should be further
agreed with the AMO. A monitoring
proposal, including type of monitoring, distribution of monitoring points and
proposed actions to be taken when reaching respective monitoring limits, should
be submitted to AMO for comments before commencement of the works. Record of monitoring should be submitted
regularly to AMO during the construction.
AMO should be alerted in case any irregularities are observed.
Archaeology
11.8.2 Operation
Phase
11.8.2.1
No EM&A would be required for built heritage
and archaeology during the operational phase.
11.9.1.1
Direct impacts from damages through contacting
with construction machineries and site negligence might be anticipated for
Gatehouse of Pok Ngar Villa
(new item pending for grading assessment) within the Project site during
construction phase. Indirect impacts of
ground-borne vibration would also be anticipated for Gatehouse of Pok Ngar Villa (New Item Pending
for Grading Assessment), Li Cottage (Grade 1), Nos. 1-3 First Street, Tai Wai
(Grade 3) and Entrance Gate, Chik Chuen
Wai (Grade 2) during construction phase.
Appropriate mitigation measures including pre- and post-condition
surveys, buffer zone and monitoring of vibration, settlement and tilting
incorporated with AAA system for the concerned buildings have been recommended
for the built heritages impacted by the Project.
11.9.1.2
A Declared Monument, Old House, Wong Uk Village, is located within 300m of the discharge area from
the revitalised TWN, and located at about 1.8km from the nearest Project
boundary. As the proposed works are mostly situated within the TWN and there is substantial separation
distance between the Old House and the proposed works, no direct and indirect impacts on the Old
House would be anticipated during the construction and operation phases of the
Project.
11.9.1.3
As no archaeological potential exists within the
Project boundary, and no SAI is identified within 300m from the Project
boundary, no impact to archaeology would be anticipated during the construction
and operational phases of the Project.
11.10.1 Bibliography
Literature
Aerial Photo
Survey and Mapping
Office, Lands Department (1963). Digital Aerial
Photo [photo]. 1:7800. 3,900
(ft). 1963-6155. Survey
and Mapping Office, Lands Department.
Survey and Mapping
Office, Lands Department (1983). Digital Aerial
Photo [photo]. 1:8000. 4,000
(ft). 48565. Survey and Mapping Office, Lands
Department.
Map
11.10.2 Glossary
|
Au Pui Wan Tsuen
|
坳背灣村
|
|
Bao’an
|
寶安
|
|
Che Kung
Temple
|
車公廟
|
|
Chik Chuen Wai
|
積存圍
|
|
Coastal
Evacuation Order
|
遷界令
|
|
Daam Hon Po
|
擔桿鋪
|
|
Fragrant wood
|
香木
|
|
Hakka
|
客家
|
|
Hanshu
|
漢書
|
|
Haus
|
侯
|
|
Lau Ancestral Hall
|
劉氏家祠
|
|
Li Cottage
|
玉山艸堂
|
|
Lius
|
廖
|
|
Lower Shing
Mun Reservoir
|
下城門水塘
|
|
Lushi Chunqiu
|
呂氏春秋
|
|
Mans
|
文
|
|
Ming dynasty
|
明朝
|
|
Pai Tau Yeuk
|
排頭約
|
|
Pangs
|
彭
|
|
Panyu
|
番禺
|
|
Pok Ngar Villa
|
博雅山莊
|
|
Qin dynasty
|
秦朝
|
|
Qing
|
清朝
|
|
San Tin
|
新田
|
|
Sha Tin Hoi
|
沙田海
|
|
Sha Tin Kau Yeuk
|
沙田九約
|
|
Shing Mun
River
|
城門河
|
|
Song dynasty
|
宋朝
|
|
Songhuiyao Jilu
|
宋會要輯錄
|
|
Tai Wai Yeuk
|
大圍約
|
|
Tangs
|
鄧
|
|
Tin Sam Yeuk
|
田心約
|
|
Tse Ancestral Hall
|
謝氏祠堂
|
|
Tung Lo Wan
|
銅鑼灣
|
|
Wai
|
韋
|
|
Wanli
|
萬曆
|
|
Wong Uk Village
|
王屋村
|
|
Xin’an
|
新安
|
|
Xin’an Gazetteer
|
新安縣誌
|
|
Yudi Jisheng
|
輿地紀勝
|
|
Yue
|
越
|