TABLE OF CONTENT

 

7                  Land contamination. 7-1

7.1              Introduction. 7-1

7.2              Environmental Legislations, Standards and Guidelines. 7-1

7.3              Description of Environment 7-1

7.4              Assessment Methodology. 7-1

7.5              Identification of Potential Land Contamination Concern. 7-2

7.6              Prediction and Evaluation of Environmental Impacts. 7-4

7.7              Evaluation of Residual Impacts. 7-4

7.8              Environmental Monitoring and Audit 7-4

7.9              Conclusion. 7-5

 

LIST OF TABLES

Table 7.1              Aerial Photographs Reviewed

Table 7.2              Summary of Incident Records

 

 

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 7.1         Photographic Records of Site Walkover (Tai Wai Nullah) (Sheet 1 of 3)

Figure 7.2         Photographic Records of Site Walkover (Tai Wai Nullah) (Sheet 2 of 3)

Figure 7.3         Photographic Records of Site Walkover (Tai Wai Nullah) (Sheet 3 of 3)

 

 

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix 7.1     Reviewed Aerial Photographs

Appendix 7.2     Acquisition of Information from Government Departments

Appendix 7.3     Site Walkover Checklist

 

 

 


7                Land contamination

7.1            Introduction

7.1.1.1     This section presents the potential implications of land contamination associated with the Project.

 

7.2            Environmental Legislations, Standards and Guidelines

7.2.1.1     The relevant environmental guidelines and standards on land contamination aspect include the following:

·            Annex 19 of Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process (EIAO-TM)

·            Guidance Note for Contaminated Land Assessment and Remediation (Guidance Note) – The Guidance Note sets out the requirements for proper assessment and management of potentially contaminated sites such as oil installations (e.g. oil depots, petrol filling stations), gas works, power plants, shipyards / boatyards, chemical manufacturing / processing plants, steel mills / metal workshops, car repairing / dismantling workshops and scrap yards.  In addition, this Guidance Note provides guidelines on how site assessments should be conducted and analysed and suggests practical remedial measures that can be adopted for the remediation of contaminated sites.

·            Practice Guide for Investigation and Remediation of Contaminated Land (Practice Guide) – The Practice Guide outlines typical investigation methods and remediation strategies for the range of potential contaminants typically encountered in Hong Kong.

·            Guidance Manual for Use of Risk-based Remediation Goals for Contaminated Land Management (Guidance Manual) – The Guidance Manual introduces the risk based approach in land contamination assessment and present instructions for comparison of soil and groundwater data to the Risk-Based Remediation Goals (RBRGs) for 54 chemicals of concern commonly found in Hong Kong.  The RBRGs were derived to suit Hong Kong conditions by following the international practice of adopting a risk-based methodology for contaminated land assessment and remediation and were designed to protect the health of people who could potentially be exposed to land impacted by chemicals under four broad post restoration land use categories.  The RBRGs also serve as the remediation targets if remediation is necessary.

 

7.3            Description of Environment

7.3.1.1     The Project site covers the existing Tai Wai Nullah, which is approximately 2 km long and 40 m wide, located at the northern region of the Tai Wai District and is mainly surrounded by residential developments.  The general layout of the Project is shown in Figure 2.1.

 

7.4            Assessment Methodology

7.4.1.1     Land contamination assessment was carried out according to the abovementioned EIAO-TM, Guidance Note, Practice Guide, Guidance Manual as well as the requirements given in Section 3.4.8 and Appendix F of the EIA Study Brief.

7.4.1.2     A site appraisal, including site walkover and desktop review, was conducted to identify the potentially contaminating activities that may pose adverse impact to the Project.  Site walkover was conducted within the Project site to review the general site conditions and to identify any sources of land contamination (or ‘hotspots’).  For the desktop review, the following information was reviewed:

·            Aerial photographs and topographic maps held by the Lands Department;

·            Hong Kong Geological Survey Map (Series HGM20) – Sheet No. 7 (1:20,000);

·            Records on dangerous goods, Chemical Waste Producer, chemical spillage/leakage and fire incidents from the identified potentially contaminated sites from Environmental Protection Department (EPD) and Fire Services Department (FSD); and

·            Relevant ground investigation (GI) reports from the Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD) civil engineering library.

 

7.4.1.3     If potentially contaminated land use(s) were identified within the Project site, the potential land contamination impacts arising from the Project would be evaluated and appropriate mitigation measures would be recommended.  If necessary, Contamination Assessment Plan (CAP), Contamination Assessment Report (CAR) and Remediation Action Plan (RAP) would be submitted to EPD for endorsement.  Any contaminated soil and/or groundwater should be treated according to EPD’s approved RAP.  A Remediation Report (RR), demonstrating adequate remediation, should be submitted to EPD for endorsement prior to the commencement of any development or redevelopment works within the Project site.

 

7.5            Identification of Potential Land Contamination Concern

7.5.1        Review of Historical Land Use

7.5.1.1     A review of historical aerial photographs was undertaken to evaluate the likelihood of potential contamination associated with past land uses within the Project site.  Findings of the review are summarised in Table 7.1 below and the aerial photographs reviewed are provided in Appendix 7.1.

Table 7.1           Aerial Photographs Reviewed

Year

Reference of Aerial Photos in Appendix 7.1
(Photo Reference Number#)

Description of Land-Uses and Site Operation/Activities

1963

AP1

(#1963-6155)

The Project site was mainly occupied by agricultural land, village houses and the Shing Mun River. 

1973

AP2

(#03252)

The existing Tai Wai Nullah was observed within the Project site.  The village houses and agricultural land were no longer observed in the Project site. 

1983

AP3

(#48565)

The existing Shing Mun River Channel and Pok Ngar Villa were observed in the south eastern and northern section of the Project site respectively.

Existing Tsuen Nam Road and the riverbank of Shing Mun River Channel were observed within the encroached portion of "Industrial (I)" zone.

1993

AP4

(#A36821)

The existing power cable bridge and Pak Tin Village Section 5 Refuse Collection Point were observed at the centre and west of the Project site respectively.

2003

AP5

(#CW53245)

No significant land use changes were observed within the Project site.

2013

AP6

(#CS45201, #CS45203)

No significant land use changes were observed within the Project site.

2021

AP7

(#E129333C, #E129336C, #E129339C, #E129342C)

Existing Tai Wai Soccer Pitch was observed in the southeast of the Project site.  No significant land use changes were observed in the remaining portions of the Project site. 

#Source of aerial photographs: Survey and Mapping Office, Lands Department

 

7.5.1.2     Based on the review, no potentially contaminating land uses were identified within the Project site.  Non-contaminating land use including the existing Tsuen Nam Road and the riverbank of Shing Mun River Channel were observed within the encroached portion of "Industrial (I)" zone since 1983.  No potential land contamination issues within the encroached portion of the "Industrial (I)" zone were noted.

 

7.5.2        Site Geology

7.5.2.1     Based on the HKGS 1:20,000 Geological Map Sheet No.7, 2nd Edition (GEO, 2008), the Project site and the adjacent hillsides generally comprises coarse-grained biotite granite of Needle Hill Granite of Kwai Chung Suite (Jkt_gc).  A layer of colluvium (Qd) and alluvium (Qcd and Qfa) is identified as superficial soil.

7.5.2.2     Based on available Ground Investigation (GI) records, a layer of fill with thickness varying from 0.1 m to 8.5 m and grain size ranging from silt to gravel was located on the top of the Project site.  Approximately 0.1 m to 9.6 m thick of alluvium (typically silt to gravel) was identified underneath the fill.  A layer of colluvium with thickness up to 10.2 m and grain size varying between silt and sand was also encountered below the fill / alluvium.

7.5.2.3     Approximately 1.18 m to 23 m thick of saprolite comprising highly to completely decomposed granite was encountered.  The inferred rockhead level varies from -26.88 mPD to +14.97 mPD.  In general, the weathering profile appeared to become deeper towards the southeast.  The bedrock was typically described as moderately strong to strong, moderately to slightly decomposed granite.

 

7.5.3        Acquisition of Information from Government Departments

7.5.3.1     The EPD and FSD were contacted for (i) records of any spillage / leakage of chemicals, (ii) records of Dangerous Goods (DG) and (iii) records of Chemical Waste Producer(s) (CWPs) within the Project site.

7.5.3.2     EPD and FSD’s replies on the request have been received and attached in Appendix 7.2.  The information is summarised below.

Environmental Protection Department

7.5.3.3     Based on the replies given by EPD on 18 September 2020 and 14 September 2022, there is no record of spillage / leakage of chemical wastes or chemicals within the Project site.

7.5.3.4     Further to the EPD’s reply, visits to EPD’s Southorn Centre Office were undertaken on 14 October 2020 and 4 November 2022 to review the available CWP records.  No CWP records were found within the Project site.

Fire Services Department

7.5.3.5     Based on the reply from FSD on 21 September 2020 and 5 October 2022, no records of DG license or incidents of spillage / leakage of DG were found within the Project site.  However, there were a total of 8 incidents records and the details are summarized in Table 7.2.  Locations of the incidents are shown in Figure 7.1 to 7.3.

7.5.3.6     As shown in Table 7.2, of the 8 incident records, 7 (Record No. 1 to 7) are related to fire incidents whereas 1 (Record No. 8) is related to animal rescue.  Given the nature of the incident, no land contamination issues are anticipated for Record No. 8.

7.5.3.7     For the remaining 7 incident records (Record No. 1 to 7), based on the observation from the site walkover (refer to Section 7.5.4), no stains, burn marks or stressed vegetation were observed at the locations.  As such, these 7 incidents were not expected to pose any potential land contamination issues to the Project.

Table 7.2    Summary of Incident Records

Record No.

Address / Lamp Post No.

(Photo Reference Number in Figure 7.1 to Figure 7.3

Date

Types of Incidents

1.

Near Lamppost EA5356, Near Shing Mun Tunnel Road, Roadside (#3472)

7 September 2019

Vegetation Fire

2.

Near Lamppost AE3708, Near Shing Wan Road, Roadside (#3462)

20 February 2020

Rubbish Fire

3.

Near Lamppost BE4330, Chung Ling Road (#3465)

24 February 2020

Rubbish Fire

4.

7SW-D/C331, Near Shing Mun River (#3552)

26 February 2020

Rubbish Fire

5.

Lamppost BE4333, Near Shing Mun Tunnel Road, Tung Lo Wan Hill Road (#3469)

24 May 2020

Vegetation Fire

6.

Near Lamppost BE4332, Near Shing Mun Tunnel Road, Roadside (#3467)

20 June 2020

Vegetation Fire

7.

Lamppost CE0608, Near Heung Fan Liu Street (#3495)

20 January 2021

Rubbish Fire 

8.

Near Lamppost CE0957, Near Mei Tin Road (outside Project site)

18 February 2022

Animal Rescue

 

7.5.4        Site Walkovers

7.5.4.1     Site walkovers were conducted on 14 August 2020 and 31 October 2022 to investigate any contaminative issues associated with current land uses and activities within the Project site.  Findings of the site walkover, including the photographic records and site layout plan, are shown in Figure 7.1 to 7.3.  Site walkover checklist is provided in Appendix 7.3.

7.5.4.2     The Project site was occupied by non-contaminating land uses including vegetation, Tai Wai Nullah, sections of Shing Mun River Channel and Mei Tin Road, footbridges, bridges, a cable bridge, footpaths, pedestrian underpass, cycling tracks, a football field (Tai Wai Soccer Pitch), a garden (Pok Ngar Villa) and a refuse collection point.  The areas at/near the 7 FSD fire incident records (Record No. 1 to 7) as discussed in Section 7.5.3 above were occupied by footpaths, cycling tracks and slope.  Based on the site walkover, no chemical / oil storage, burn marks or stressed vegetation were observed within the Project site.  The concrete paved ground was noted to be in good condition with no oil stains observed.  No potentially contaminating land uses / activities were observed within the Project site during the site walkover.

7.5.4.3     According to the Approved Sha Tin Outline Zoning Plan (OZP) No. S/ST/36, part of the Project site was identified as "Industrial (I)" zone.  However, the encroached portion only consists of Tsuen Nam Road, footpath, cycling tracks and vegetated land.  Based on the site walkover, no chemical / oil storage or stressed vegetation were observed within the encroached portion.  The concrete paved ground was noted to be in good condition with no oil stains observed.  No potentially contaminating land uses / activities were observed during the site walkover.  Given the above, no potential land contamination issues within the encroached portion of the "Industrial (I)" zone were observed.

 

7.6            Prediction and Evaluation of Environmental Impacts

7.6.1.1     Based on the findings of site appraisal, the Project site has been occupied by non-contaminating land uses (e.g. the existing nullah, football field, refuse collection point and roads) and no potentially contaminating activities were observed.  Therefore, no adverse land contamination impact arising from the Project is anticipated and mitigation measures are considered not necessary.  No further site investigation (SI) works at the Project site is required.

 

7.7            Evaluation of Residual Impacts

7.7.1.1     As land contamination impacts are not anticipated for the Project, no residual impacts are expected.

 

7.8            Environmental Monitoring and Audit

7.8.1.1     Based on the site appraisal, no land contamination impacts are anticipated for the Project.  No environmental monitoring and audit programme would be required.

 

7.9            Conclusion

7.9.1.1     A site appraisal, in the form of desktop review and site walkover, was conducted from August 2020 to November 2022 to identify any current/historical potentially contaminating and uses within the Project site.

7.9.1.2     Based on the findings of the site appraisal, no adverse land contamination impact arising from Project is anticipated.  No further SI works at the Project site is required.