`
11.1 Legislation,
Standards and Guidelines
11.4 Tentative
Project Programme
11.8 Proposed
Mitigation Measures
Appendix 11.1 Tree
Survey Plan
Appendix 11.2
Broad brush Tree Survey
Figures
Figure 11.1.2 Planning and Development Control
Frameworks
Figure 11.1.3 Location of Siu Lam Barging Point and Tuen Mun OZP
Figure 11.2.1 Landscape Resources
Figure 11.2.2 Landscape Character Areas
Figure 11.3.1 Photographs of Landscape Resources Sheet 1
Figure 11.3.2 Photographs of Landscape Resources Sheet 2
Figure 11.3.3 Photographs of Landscape Resources Sheet 3
Figure 11.3.4 Photographs of Landscape Resources Sheet 4
Figure 11.3.5 Photographs of Landscape Resources Sheet 5
Figure 11.3.6 Photographs of Landscape Resources Sheet 6
Figure 11.3.7 Photographs of Landscape Character Areas Sheet 1
Figure 11.3.8 Photographs of Landscape Character Areas Sheet 2
Figure 11.4.1 Visual Envelope Locations of Visual Sensitive Receivers (VSRs) and Vantage Point (VPs)
Figure 11.5.1 Photographs of Visually Sensitive Receivers Sheet 1
Figure 11.5.2 Photographs of Visually Sensitive Receivers Sheet 2
Figure 11.5.3 Photographs of Visually Sensitive Receivers Sheet 3
Figure 11.5.4 Photographs of Visually Sensitive Receivers Sheet 4
Figure 11.6.1a Landscape Master Plan and Proposed Mitigation Measures ¡V Sandy Ridge
Figure 11.6.2 Landscape Master Plan and Proposed Mitigation Measures ¡V
Lin Ma Hang Road
Figure 11.6.3 Landscape Blow-up Plan and Sections
Figure 11.6.4 Landscape Sections of Viaduct
Figure 11.6.5 Landscape Sections of Future Columbarium Buildings
(Indicative)
Figure 11.6.6 Landscape Sections of Retaining Wall Treatment
Figure 11.7.1 Photomontages of Vantage
Point (VP1)
Figure 11.7.2a Photomontages of Vantage Point (VP2)
Figure 11.7.2b Photomontages of Vantage Point (VP2)
Figure 11.7.3 Photomontages of Vantage
Point (VP3)
Figure 11.7.4 Photomontages of Vantage
Point (VP4)
Figure 11.7.5 Photomontages of Vantage
Point (VP5)
Figure 11.7.6a Photomontages of Vantage Point (VP6)
Figure 11.7.6b Photomontages of Vantage
Point (VP6)
Figure 11.7.7 Photomontages of Vantage
Point (VP7)
11.1
Legislation,
Standards and Guidelines
11.1.1 General
11.1.1.1 The methodology for
undertaking the landscape and visual impact assessment is in accordance with
Annex 10 and 18 of the Technical Memorandum on Environment Impact Assessment
Process, the EIAO Guidance Note No. 8/2010 and the EIA Study Brief No.
ESB-271/2014. Legislation,
standards and guidelines applicable to this assessment are as follows:
 Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap. 499) and the Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process (TM), particularly Annexes 10 and 18;
 Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines (HKPSG) (Ch. 4, 10 & 11);
 EIAO Guidance Note No. 8/2010 on Preparation of Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment under the EIAO;
 Development Bureau Technical Circular (Works) (DEVB TCW) No. 07/2015 ¡V Tree Preservation
 Environmental, Transport and Works Bureau Technical Circular (Works) (ETWB TCW) No. 29/2004 ¡V Registration of Old and Valuable Trees, and Guidelines for their Preservation;
 DEVB TCW No. 06/2015 ¡V Maintenance of Vegetation and Hard Landscape Features;
 DEVB TCW No. 2/2012 on Allocation of Space for Quality Greening on Road;
 WBTC No. 36/2004 ¡V Advisory Committee on the Appearance of Bridges and Associated Structures (ACABAS);
 DEVB TC(W) No. 2/2013 ¡V Greening on Footbridges and Flyovers;
 ETWB TCW No. 34/2003 Community Involvement in Greening Works;
 ETWB TCW No. 5/2005 on Protection of natural streams/rivers from adverse impacts arising from construction works;
 Town Planning Ordinance and Town Planning (Amendment) Ordinance (Cap.131);
 Country Park Ordinance (Cap. 208);
 Forests and Countryside Ordinance (Cap.96);
 Protection of Endangered Species of Animals And Plants Ordinance (Cap 586);
 Related Statutory Plans, e.g. Outline Zoning Plans;
 Geotechnical Engineering Office (GEO) Publication No.1/2011 Technical Guidelines on Landscape Treatment for Slopes;
 Landscape Value Mapping Study in Hong Kong;
 Green Infrastructure, the Greening, Landscape and Tree Management (GLTM) of DEVB;
 Measures on Tree Preservation, GLTM of DEVB; and
 DEVB TCW No.3/2012 Site Coverage of Greenery for Government Building Projects.
11.1.2 Review of Planning and Development Control Framework
11.1.2.1 Review of the
existing and planned development framework for the proposed works and for the
surroundings has been considered. It aims at identifying issues for the
neighbouring planned land uses, identifying potential resources and sensitive
receivers, and ensuring a high compatibility between the Project and the
surroundings.
11.1.2.2 The Assessment Area
is covered by:
 Approved Man Kam To Outline Zoning Plan (OZP) (No.S/NE-MKT/2); and
 Approved Fu Tei Au and Sha Ling OZP (No.S/NE-FTA/14)
11.1.2.3 The review of OZPs
has not only included a review of the plans, but also the Notes which form part
of these plans and the Explanatory Statements which accompany the plans.
11.1.2.4 There are natural
woodland, scrubland and wetland of high landscape value found within the
Project boundary. The proposed work will not encroach in any Amenity Area (A),
Conservation Area (CA), and Country Park (CP). The proposed development mainly
falls within the Other Specific Use (Cemetery, Columbarium, Crematorium and
Funeral Related Uses) zone. Only a small portion of the associated works will be fallen within
Agricultural (AGR) zone and Green Belt (GB) zone.
11.1.2.5 Aerial photo showing
the layout is given in Figure 11.1.1.
The Project boundary is located within the Frontier Closed Area (FCA) and its
future development has been studied in Agreement No. CE 60/2005 (TP)-Land Use
Planning for Closed Area ¡V Feasibility Study and The Land Use Planning for the
Closed Area ¡V Stage 2 Community Engagement Digest. The majority of the Project
boundary is covered by the Man Kam To OZP.
11.1.2.6 The layout has been
superimposed onto the existing OZPs to determine whether there is an effect on
the zoned use (Figure
11.1.2).
Areas of existing zonings affected are given in Table 11.1 and Table 11.2.
Table 11.1 Approved Man Kam
To Outline Zoning Plan (No.S/NE-MKT/2)
Zoning Type |
Existing Area
(ha) |
Areas within
the Project Boundary (ha) |
Areas within
the Work Areas (ha) |
Government, Institution or
Community (G/IC) |
11.28 |
0.16 |
- |
Other Specified Uses (Cemetery,
Columbarium, Crematorium and Funeral Related Uses) (OU) |
92.08 |
92.08 |
14.5 |
Other Specified Uses (Boundary
Crossing Facilities) (OU) |
10.14 |
3.58 |
- |
Agriculture (AGR) |
59.73 |
- |
- |
Green Belt (GB) |
113.48 |
3.11 |
- |
Village Type Development (V) |
27.62 |
- |
- |
Recreation (REC) |
15.01 |
- |
- |
Conservation Area (CA) |
4.24 |
- |
- |
Table 11.2
Approved Fu Tei Au and Sha Ling OZP (No.S/NE-FTA/14)
Zoning Type |
Existing Area
(ha) |
Areas within
the Project Boundary (ha) |
Areas within the
Work Areas (ha) |
Government, Institution or
Community (G/IC) |
23.58 |
0.26 |
- |
Other Specified Uses (Poultry
Slaughtering Centre) (OU) |
1.3 |
- |
- |
Other Specified Uses (Port Back
Uses) (OU) |
7.5 |
- |
- |
Agriculture (AGR) |
129.95 |
0.58 |
0.42 |
Green Belt (GB) |
112.42 |
- |
- |
Open Storage (OS) |
7.2 |
- |
- |
Table 11.2a Approved Tuen Mun OZP (No. S/TM/33)
Zoning Type |
Existing Area
(ha) |
Areas within
the Barging Point (ha) |
Comprehensive Development Area
(CDA) |
9.0 |
1.7 |
Open Space (O) |
0.9 |
0.19 |
11.1.2.7 Table 11.1 summarizes the areas of existing zonings within overall
Approved Man Kam To Outline Zoning Plan (No.S/NE-MKT/2). The area of each
zoning type within the Project boundary and that within the work areas where
impacts are considered to be largely irreversible except for areas under
viaduct. There is no change to any of the existing zonings. The Project is
therefore considered largely compatible with this Draft Outline Zoning Plan.
11.1.2.8 Table 11.2 summarises the areas of existing zonings within the overall
Approved Fu Tei Au and Sha Ling OZP (No.S/NE-FTA/14). The areas of each zoning
type within the Project boundary and that within the work areas where impacts
are considered to be largely irreversible. The permanent impact on 0.42ha AGR
constitutes approximately 0.3% of the total area of this zoning type within
this OZP, suggesting a relatively insignificant impact. They are all the works
area at Sha Ling Road which fallen into the agricultural zone. The Project is
therefore not considered to conflict with the OZP Plan.
11.1.2.9 Table 11.2a summarises the areas of existing zonings within the overall
Tuen Mun OZP (No.S/TM/33). The proposed barging point
at Siu Lam falls within Tuen Mun Outline Zoning Plan (No. S/TM/33), the works
area will encroach the future Comprehensive Development Area (CDA) and Open
Space (O), however, those zoning areas are not developed yet and the existing
landscape value is considered to be low.
11.2.1.1 Certain projects that
have been undertaken in and around the Project boundary have been referred for
this Report.
11.2.1.2 Land Use Planning
for the Closed Area, Planning Department (PlanD). The study examined the future
use of the areas to be released from the Closed Area covering the current
Project boundary with a view to putting them under planning control. It
provided a sustainable planning framework to balance the needs for conservation
and development within its Project boundary. The Recommended Development Plan
(RDP) under the study served as the basis for the preparation of statutory town
plans before the new boundary of the Closed Area came into effect in early
2012. According to this RDP, the current Project boundary was identified as
having potential for cemetery related uses to meet the growing territorial
demand. ¡¥Other Specified Use¡¦
annotated ¡¥Cemetery¡¦ was recommended as the zoning for the area. With reference
to the RDP, the area is zoned ¡§Other Specified Uses (Cemetery, Columbarium,
Crematorium and Funeral Related Uses)¡¨ on the Man Kam To Outline Zoning
Plan.
11.2.1.3 Construction of a
Secondary Boundary Fence and New Sections of Primary Boundary Fence and Patrol
Road Phase 1, by Architectural Services Department (ArchSD) had been finished
in 2012. Phase 2 will be completed by the end of 2015. The project mainly
composed of the construction of a secondary boundary fence (SBF) along the
southern edge of the existing boundary patrol road (BPR) (approximately 21.7km)
from west (Pak Hok Chau) to east (Sha Tau Kok).
11.2.1.4 North East New
Territories New Development Areas, Civil Engineering Development Department
(CEDD). The North East New Territories New Development Areas Planning and
Engineering Study (i.e. the NENT NDAs Study) formulates the development plans
for the NDAs in Kwu Tung North (KTN), Fanling North (FLN) and Ping Che / Ta Kwu
Ling (PC/TKL) to meet long-term housing, social, economic and environmental
needs, and to formulate an implementation programme for first population intake
to these NDAs by 2022. None of the three NDAs fall within the current Project
boundary although the northern parts of KTN and FLN NDAs are less than 500 m
from Sandy Ridge.
11.2.1.5 Development of
Organic Waste Treatment Facilities Phase II Environmental Protection Department
(EPD). EPD proposed the development of Organic Waste Treatment Facilities
(OWTF) in Hong Kong, aiming to adopt proven biological treatment technologies
to recover reusable materials and energy, such as compost, heat, electricity
and biogas from source-separated organic waste which is currently being
disposed of at landfills. OWTFs are expected to positively contribute to the
Hong Kong SAR Government¡¦s municipal solid waste management policy. The OWTFs
are being developed in two phases, Phase I at Siu Ho Wan, North Lantau and
Phase II at Shaling, North District. The OWTF phase II Preliminary Environment
Review (PER) report was published in April 2011 and the Feasibility Study and
EIA started in late 2011. The proposed site for Phase II is about 2.5ha and
approximately 200m southeast from the current Project boundary. It is currently
used as a livestock waste composting plant which will be demolished and
replaced by the proposed OWTF Phase II. According to the PER, the
implementation of the Project is not expected to have any further effect on the
existing landscape character and visual quality within and around Sha Ling and
direct impact to any trees is unlikely. The construction of the OWTF Phase II
would start in 2014 and its operation is tentatively scheduled to start in
2016.
11.2.1.6 Widening of 2
Sections of Lin Ma Hang Road (Sections between Ping Yuen River and between
Tsung Yuen Ha and Lin Ma Hang). The Project comprises of two PWP Items namely
¡§Western Section¡¨ and ¡§Eastern Section¡¨.
11.2.1.7 Widening of Western
Section of Lin Ma Hang Road between Ping Yuen River and Ping Che Road is road
widening of about 0.75km of Lin Ma Hang Road between Ping Yuen River and Ping
Che Road to a 7.3m wide single two-lane carriageway with 2m wide footpath on
both sides of the carriageway including the reconstruction and upgrade of the
existing single lane vehicular bridge (N943) crossing Ping Yuen River to a two
lanes bridge and associated drainage, traffic aids, street lighting,
environmental mitigation works, landscaping works, slope works and other
ancillary works.
11.2.1.8 Widening of eastern
section of Lin Ma Hang Road between Tsung Yuen Ha and Lin Ma Hang is a road
widening of about 3.15km of Lin Ma Hang Road between Tsung Yuen Ha and Lin Ma
Hang to a 7.3m wide single two-lane carriageway with 2m wide footpath on both
sides of the carriageway and provision of vehicle parking facilities at Wang
Lek, associated drainage, traffic aids, street lighting, environmental
mitigation works, landscaping works, slope works, bored pile walls and other
ancillary works.
11.3.1.1 Landscape and visual
impacts will be assessed separately for the construction and operational
phases.
11.3.1.2 The Landscape Impact Assessment (LIA) boundary includes the area within 500m distance from the Project boundary to better exam the compatibility of the Project with its surrounding environment.
Broad-brush Tree Survey and
Vegetation Survey
11.3.1.3
Individual tree survey and group tree survey were conducted
between May 2014 and September 2015. Individual tree survey was conducted at
the area which have proposed works, as well as any area that will be
potentially affected. All methodologies of individual tree survey has followed
the DEVB TCW No.
07/2015 ¡V Tree Preservation.
11.3.1.4
Broad-brush tree group survey was conducted at all areas within
the 500m LIA boundary excluding the individual tree survey areas. Tree groups were identified on
the basis of contiguous areas of vegetation with a similar character. Each tree
group shall include the estimation percentage of the tree species distribution
and its maturity by on site observation (refer to Appendix 11.1 and 11.2).
11.3.1.5 Vegetation survey work was conducted between August 2013 and December 2014. A vegetation survey was conducted during the late dry season and the wet season to record the dominant and notable plant species, their status in Hong Kong and relative abundance. The methodology of the vegetation survey has been detailed in Section 9.3.
11.3.1.6
Existing trees which meet one or more of the below criteria
will be identified:
 trees of 100 years old or above;
 trees of cultural, historical or memorable significance e.g. Fung Shui tree, tree as landmark of monastery or heritage monument, and trees in memory of an important person or event;
 trees of precious or rare species;
 trees of outstanding form (taking account of overall tree sizes, shape and any special features) e.g. trees with curtain like aerial roots, trees growing in unusual habitat; or;
 trees with trunk diameter equal to or exceeding 1.0 metre (m) (measured at 1.3 m above ground level), or with height/canopy spread equal to or exceeding 25 m.
11.3.2 Landscape Impact Assessment Methodology
11.3.2.1 The assessment of landscape
impacts will involve the following procedures:
 Identify the existing/planned/approved land uses as the part of baseline conditions. All direct and indirect impacts on existing /planned /approved land uses, and on future outlook of the area should be discussed;
 Identify and quantify the baseline conditions of landscape resources and landscape character areas found within the study area;
 Assess the degree of landscape sensitivity of the landscape resources and landscape character areas;
 Identify the potential sources of landscape impacts and access the magnitude of change;
 Assess the significance thresholds of potential landscape impact
(before mitigation);
 Identify the potential mitigation measures;
 Assess the significance thresholds of residual impact (after mitigation): operation Day 1 and Year 10.
11.3.2.2 Detailed
descriptions of the above assessment methodology are given in the following
sections.
Identify the
existing/planned/approved land uses as the part of baseline conditions. All
direct and indirect impacts on existing /planned /approved land uses, and on
future outlook of the area should be discussed
11.3.2.3 This should cover the information in the statutory plans under the Town Planning Ordinance, and non-statutory plans. Relevant planning and landscape guidelines as recommended in planning studies, planning briefs or planning documents relevant to the assessment area such as landscape / urban design strategies, frameworks and concepts, building height profiles, special design areas, landmarks, designated view corridors, open space networks, landscape links and landscape character types, and any projects or planning studies surrounding.
Identify and quantify the
baseline conditions of landscape resources and landscape character areas found
within the study area
11.3.2.4
This is achieved by site visit and desktop study of
topographical maps, information databases and photographs (refer to Figures
11.1.1 and 11.3 series).
Assess the degree of landscape sensitivity of the landscape
resources and landscape character areas
11.3.2.5 This is influenced by a number of factors including:
 quality of landscape resources / characters;
 importance and rarity of special landscape elements;
 ability of the landscape to accommodate change;
 significance of the change in local and regional context;
 maturity of the landscape; and
 The factor of importance and rarity of special landscape elements cannot be applied on the landscape resources which related to abandon pond (LR5). The maturity of the landscape cannot be applied on the landscape resources which related to pond, marsh and wetland, and agricultural land (LR5, LR7, LR9, LR11, and LR20). For the entire landscape resources, the rest of factors will be considered to judge on its landscape sensitivity.
11.3.2.6 The sensitivity of
each landscape resource and character area is classified as follows:
High: |
Important landscape or landscape resource of particularly distinctive character or high importance, sensitive to relatively small changes. |
Medium: |
Landscape or landscape resource of moderately valued landscape characteristics reasonably tolerant to change. |
Low: |
Landscape or landscape resource of low valued landscape characteristics highly tolerant to change. |
Identify the potential sources of landscape impacts and access the
magnitude of change
11.3.2.7 These are the various elements of the construction works and operation procedures that would generate landscape impacts.
Assess the significance thresholds of potential landscape impact
(before mitigation)
11.3.2.8 The magnitude of landscape impacts is classified as follows:
Large: |
The landscape or landscape resource would suffer
major change. |
Intermediate: |
The landscape or landscape resource would suffer
moderate change. |
Small: |
The landscape or landscape resource would suffer
slight or barely perceptible change. |
Negligible: |
The landscape or landscape resource would suffer
no discernible change. |
Identify the potential
mitigation measures
11.3.2.9 Mitigation measures may take the form of adopting alternative designs or revisions to the basic engineering and architectural design to prevent and/or minimise adverse impacts; remedial measures such as colour and textural treatment of building features; and compensatory measures such as the implementation of landscape design measures (e.g. tree planting, creation of new open space etc.) to compensate for unavoidable adverse impacts and to attempt to generate potentially beneficial long term impacts. The agencies responsible for the funding, implementation, management and maintenance of the mitigation measures are identified and their approvals-in-principle are being sought.
11.3.2.10 The mitigation measures are provided and discussed in Section 11.8. The agencies responsible
for the funding, implementation, and maintenance of the mitigation measures are
proposed in Table 11.9.
Assess the significance thresholds of residual impact (after
mitigation): operation Day 1 and Year 10
11.3.2.11 Prediction of potential landscape impacts should cover beneficial / adverse,
direct / indirect, short term / long term, reversible / irreversible and
cumulative impacts. By synthesising the magnitude of the various impacts and
the sensitivity of the various landscape resources it is possible to categorise
impacts in a logical, well-reasoned and consistent fashion. Table 11.3 shows the rationale for
dividing the degree of significance into four thresholds, namely insubstantial,
slight, moderate, and substantial, depending on the combination of a
negligible-small-intermediate-large magnitude of impact and a low-medium-high
degree of sensitivity of landscape resource/character. Residual impacts of each
LR and LCA has been assessed in situation of the development without mitigation
measures, development with mitigation measures operational (Day 1), and
development with mitigation measures operational (Year 10). Mitigation measures
will be identified and applied specifically on each affected landscape
resources and landscape character areas to response the identified potential impacts
during construction period and operation period.
Table 11.3 Relationship between Landscape Resources
and Landscape Character Area sensitivity and impact magnitude in defining
impact significance
|
Receptor Sensitivity of
Landscape Resource, Landscape Character Area |
|||
Low |
Medium |
High |
||
Magnitude of Impact (Change) |
Large |
Moderate |
Moderate /
Substantial |
Substantial |
Intermediate |
Slight / Moderate |
Moderate |
Moderate /
Substantial |
|
Small |
Slight |
Slight /
Moderate |
Moderate |
|
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
11.3.2.12 The significance of
landscape impacts is categorised as follows:
Substantial: |
Adverse / beneficial impact where the proposal would cause significant deterioration or improvement in existing landscape quality. |
Moderate: |
Adverse / beneficial impact where the proposal would cause noticeable deterioration or improvement in existing landscape quality. |
Slight: |
Adverse / beneficial impact where the proposal would cause barely perceptible deterioration or improvement in existing landscape quality. |
Insubstantial: |
No discernible change in the existing landscape quality. |
11.3.2.13 Prediction of
Acceptability of Impacts. An overall assessment of the acceptability, or
otherwise, of the impacts according to the five criteria set out in Annex 10 of
the TM-EIAO
11.3.3 Visual Impact Assessment Methodology
11.3.3.1 The assessment of visual impacts has involved the following:
 Identify the of Zones of Visual Influence (ZVIs) during the construction and operational phase of the project;
 Identify the of Visual Sensitive Receivers (VSRs) within the Zone of Visual Influence (ZVIs) at construction and operational phases;
 Assess the degree of sensitivity to change of the VSRs;
 Identify the relative numbers of VSRs;
 Identify the potential sources of visual impacts;
 Assess the potential magnitude of visual impacts;
 Identify the potential visual mitigation measures; and
 Predict the significance of visual impacts before and after the implementation of the mitigation measures
Identify the ZVIs during the construction and operational
phase of the project
11.3.3.2 This is achieved by
site visit and desktop study of topographic maps and photographs, and
preparation of cross-section to determine the visibility of the project from
various locations.
Identify the VSRs within the ZVIs at construction and
operational phases
11.3.3.3 These are the people
who would reside within, work within, play within, or travel through, the ZVIs.
Assess the degree of sensitivity to change of the VSRs
11.3.3.4 Factors considered
include:
 the type of VSRs, which is classified according to whether the person is at home, at work, at school, at play, or travelling. Those who view the impact from their homes are considered to be highly sensitive as the attractiveness or otherwise of the outlook from their home will have a substantial effect on their perception of the quality and acceptability of their home environment and their general quality of life. Those who view the impact from their workplace and at school are considered to be only moderately sensitive as the attractiveness or otherwise of the outlook will have a less important, although still material, effect on their perception of their quality of life. The degree to which this applies depends on whether the workplace is industrial, retail or commercial. Those who view the impact whilst taking part in an outdoor leisure activity may display varying sensitivity depending on the type of leisure activity. Those who view the impact whilst travelling on a public thoroughfare will also display varying sensitivity depending on the speed of travel; and
 other factors which are considered (as required by EIAO Guidance Note No. 8/2010) include the number of individuals, value and quality of existing views, the availability and amenity of alternative views, number of VSRs, the duration or frequency of view, and the degree of visibility.
11.3.3.5 The sensitivity of VSRs is classified as follows:
High: |
The VSRs are highly sensitive to any
change in their viewing experience. |
Medium: |
The VSRs are moderately sensitive to any
change in their viewing experience. |
Low: |
The VSRs are only slightly sensitive to
any change in their viewing experience. |
Identify the relative numbers of VSRs
11.3.3.6 This is expressed in
term of whether there are few, medium or many VSRs in any one category of VSR.
Identify the potential sources of visual impacts
11.3.3.7 These are the
various elements of the construction works and operational procedures that
would generate visual impacts.
Assess the potential magnitude of visual impacts
11.3.3.8 These are the
various elements of the construction works and operational procedures that
would generate visual impacts.
Assess the potential magnitude of visual impact
11.3.3.9 Factors considered include
 the compatibility with the surrounding landscape;
 the duration of the impact;
 the reversibility of the impact;
 the scale of the impact and distance of the source of impact from the viewer; and
 the degree of visibility of the impact, and the degree of which the impact dominates the field of vision of the viewer.
11.3.3.10 The magnitude of
visual impacts is classified as follows:
Large: |
The VSRs would suffer major change in their
viewing experience. |
Intermediate: |
The VSRs would suffer moderate change in their
viewing experience. |
Small: |
The VSRs would suffer small change in their
viewing experience. |
Negligible: |
The VSRs would suffer no discernible change in
their viewing experience. |
Table 11.3a Relationship between receptor
sensitivity and impact magnitude in defining impact significance
|
Receptor
Sensitivity of VSR |
|||
Low |
Medium |
High |
||
Magnitude of Impact (Change) |
Large |
Moderate |
Moderate / Substantial |
Substantial |
Intermediate |
Slight / Moderate |
Moderate |
Moderate / Substantial |
|
Small |
Slight |
Slight / Moderate |
Moderate |
|
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Identify the potential visual mitigation measures
11.3.3.11 These may take the
form of adopting alternative designs or revisions to the basic engineering and architectural
design to prevent and / or minimise adverse impacts, remedial measures such as
colour and textural treatment of building features, and tree planting to screen
the roads and associated bridge structures. The agencies responsible for the
funding, implementation, maintenance of the mitigation measures are identified
and their approval-in-principle has been sought.
Predict the significance of visual impacts before and after
the implementation of the mitigation measures
11.3.3.12 Prediction of
potential visual impacts should cover beneficial / adverse, direct / indirect,
short term / long term, reversible / irreversible and cumulative impacts. By
synthesising the magnitude of the various visual impacts and the sensitivity of
the VSRs, and the numbers of VSRs that are affected, it is possible to
categorise the degree of significance of the impacts in a logical,
well-reasoned and consistent fashion. Table
11.3 shows the rationale for dividing the degree of significance into four
thresholds, namely, insubstantial, slight, moderate and substantial, depending
on the combination of a negligible-small-intermediate-large magnitude of impact
and a low-medium-high degree of sensitivity of VSRs.
11.3.3.13 The significance of
visual impacts is categorised as follows:
Substantial: |
Adverse / beneficial impact where the proposal
would cause significant deterioration or improvement in existing visual
quality. |
Moderate: |
Adverse / beneficial impact where the proposal
would cause noticeable deterioration or improvement in existing visual
quality. |
Slight: |
Adverse / beneficial impact where the proposal
would cause barely perceptible deterioration or improvement in existing
visual quality. |
Insubstantial: |
No discernible change in the existing visual
quality. |
11.3.3.14 Prediction of
Acceptability of Impacts. An overall assessment of the acceptability, or
otherwise, of the impacts according to the five criteria set out in Annex 10 of
the TM-EIAO.
11.4
Tentative
Project Programme
11.4.1.1 The tentative
commencement year for the construction works would be mid 2017, and it would be
completed in late 2022.
11.5.1.1 The area covers MTR
Lo Wu Station, the C&C facilities, the southern section of Sha Ling Road to
be widened, a new road connection between Man Kam To Road and Sha Ling Road, an
area north of the columbarium site, as well as east of the road network
associated at Man Kam To. A total
of eighteen LRs and six LCAs have been identified in this area.
11.5.1.2 LRs and LCAs found
in the 500m buffer from the Project boundary are described in Table 11.4 below along with their
sensitivity, and illustrated in Figures 11.2.1 and 11.2.2.
Photo records of these LRs and LCAs are shown in Figures 11.3.1 to 11.3.8.
11.5.1.3 In addition, an off-site barging point at Siu Lam will be utilised
as part of this Project (see Figure
1.3). This barging point is currently in use for the Express Rail
Link project. The site occupies developed area at Siu Lam along coastline.
Minor construction works for the tipping halls and new ramps are required and
would not involve any excavation. The landscape and visual impact of the
barging point has been fully assessed in Express Rail Link EIA report, which
was approved under EIAO with registered no. AEIAR-143/2009. Hence, it is considered that the landscape and
visual impact is acceptable while all required mitigation measures stated in
the Environmental Permit and EIA report (AEIAR-143/2009)
applied.
Table 11.4 Landscape Resources / Landscape Character Areas and their sensitivity
to change
ID. No. |
Landscape Resources / Landscape Characters |
Sensitivity (Low, Medium,
High) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LR1 |
Hillside
Woodland This LR refers to the
largely patches of woodland forms at the valley and foothills. Woodlands in these areas predominantly
border uphill grassland/ shrubland areas and sometimes adjoin plantation
areas. Due to
sheltered conditions of the valleys and limited human disturbance. This LR is relatively mature
and has low ability to accommodate change. Its sensitivity is considered to be high. LR1.1 ¡V Hillside Woodland Distribute at Valley Continuous patches of woodland forms at the valley of Sandy Ridge
upland. They were sheltered from storms and hill fire events by the
protection of the natural topography. Trees in this LR are mature and medium
to large size. The woodland structure and the dominance of light demanding
plant species understories and form a forest like appearance. Dense and mature vegetation are formed
with the rich soil nutrition and natural water stream. Dominant tree species in the secondary
forests include Macaranga tanarius
var. tomentosa, Ficus hispida, Celtis sinensis, Cinnamomum camphora and
Schefflera heptaphylla, while the woodland plantings are
largely dominated by Lophostemon
confertus. Protected species are found within this LR. One number of Aquilaria sinensis was recorded at the
middle hill of the valley at the north of Sandy Ridge. 1 no. of mature tree (with DBH ≥ 1m) found within this
LR, namely Bombax ceiba. It is
naturally grown along the exiting rural roadside area. Tree Groups distributed within this LR: TG01, TG30, TG31, TG32, TG39
LR1.2 ¡V Hillside Woodland Distribute along the toe of Upland This was a more disturbed woodland formed along the slope toes and foothills
of Sandy Ridge, as well as the adjacent upland within the assessment area,
namely Crest Hill and Cheung Po Tau. Comparing with woodland in the valleys, these trees
combination presented relatively young. There are also some graves and cemeteries found inside the woodland.
This form of woodland were adjacent to the human activities. Some dead plant or mixture of natural
vegetation and artificial plantation were commonly found at the edge of the
woodland. Dominant species included Lophostemon
confertus, Ficus hispida, Melia azedarach, and Cassia siamea. One mature Aquilaria sinensis
was recorded at the eastern foothill of Sandy Ridge. Seedling young trees of Aquilaria
sinensis were recorded at the woodland edge next to Sha Ling Road. Tree Groups distributed within this LR:
TG13, TG17, TG18, TG22, TG23, TG25, TG24, TG26, TG27, TG35, TG36, TG37,
TG2001, TG2002, TG2003, TG2027, TG2029, TG2030, TG2037, TG2040, TG2041,
TG2043, TG2044, TG2048, TG2049, TG2050, TG2051, TG2058, TG2059
LR1.3 ¡V Exposed Uphill Woodland Several woodland were
spread over some small hills within the assessment area. Some degree of human
activities were observed surrounding the woodland, such as the daily
activities of Muk Wu and Muk Wu Nga Yiu villages, and the daily operation of
Man Kam To Boundary Control Point and Food Control Office. The tree group
density was relatively lower than the woodland found at the valley. An
especially large piece of woodland formed at the eastern side of Sandy Ridge
adjacent to Man Kam To Boundary Control Point. It was formed with more
diverse floristic composition and complex structure. It was formed with
mixture of native and exotic species included Acacia confusa, Dimocarpus
longan, Celtis sinensis, and Machilus pauhoi. Tree Groups distributed within this LR:
TG2052, TG2056, TG2057, TG2059
|
High |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LR2 |
Hillside Shrubby Grassland This LR refers to an extensive area of grassland and scattered shrubland
on the uplands. It always merges into hillside woodland and plantation at
foothills and protected ravines.
Isolated graves can sometimes be found scattered among the grasses.
Small portion of tree groups are fallen within this LR, mainly along the edge
of the area. However, its dominate planting are natural shrubs and grasses. This LR can re-establish itself easily and is therefore tolerant to
changes. Its sensitivity is considered to be medium. LR2.1 ¡V Uphill Shrubby Grassland This LR was largely formed at the uplands of Sandy Ridge, as well as
the adjacent Cheung Po Tau and Kong Nga Po. It grow under high exposure area.
Isolated graves are found scattered among the grasses. This LR along hill slopes in Hong Kong
is typically fire-maintained. Several bush-fire occurred in the past few
years in Sandy Ridge and therefore the new grass were in young form. Common
plants include a variety of grasses and ferns (Miscanthus sinensis, Dicranopteris pedata, Bidens pilosa, Ageratum
conyzoides and Panicum maximum), shrubs (Rhaphiolepis indica, Embelia laeta,
Rhus chinensis and Baeckea frutescens) and small trees (Cratoxylum cochinchinense, Phyllanthus
emblica and Rhus chinensis).
Orchids group of Arundina
graminifolia and Habenaria dentate
are found. Both orchids are protected under Forestry and Countryside
Ordinance (Cap. 96) and the Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and
Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586). Tree Groups distributed within this LR:
TG01, TG9, TG10, TG11, TG23, TG38
LR2.2 - Foothill and Middle hill Shrubby Grassland This LR refers to a mosaic of shrubland and grassland form at the
Cheung Po Tau, Lo Shu Ling, and Tai Shek Mo. It is large in size and uniform
in appearance. It merges into hillside woodland and plantation at foothills
and protected ravines. Common species found include grasses such as Imperata koenigii, Neyraudia reynaudiana,
Bidens alba, Panicum maximum and Miscanthus
spp., fern Dicranopteris pedata
and shrubs Baeckea frutescens, Breynia fruticosa, Litsea rotundifolia
var. oblongifolia and Rhaphiolepis indica. Those planting
growth are considered as relatively better than those found within LR2.1. Eulophia
graminea was recorded close to the trail on the hill and grassland to the north
of Livestock Waste Control Centre. This orchid species has been recorded in
restricted localities in Hong Kong, and found in grassy slopes, open fields
and thin forest areas (AFCD, 2011). This species is protected under Cap. 96
and Cap. 586. Rhododendron species
also found in the grassland located to the south-west of Sandy Ridge Cemetery
Office, and within the Fujian Cemetery at Lo Wu Road, which is also protected
under Cap. 96 and Cap. 586. Tree Groups distributed within this LR:
TG11, TG12, TG18, TG20, TG24, TG25, TG27, TG28, TG32, TG36, TG37, TG38, TG39,
TG2002, TG2003, TG2004, TG2041, TG2043, TG2047, TG2049, TG2050, TG2058,
TG2059
LR2.3 ¡V Crest Hill Shrubby Grassland This LR is located in the far west of the assessment area. The shrubby
grassland at Crest Hill was relatively in a more mature form and with a more
diverse form of fauna. Common species such as Dicranopteris pedata, Neyraudia
reynaudiana, and Miscanthus floridulus
are found within this area. Tree Groups distributed within this LR:
TG2002, TG2058
|
Medium |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LR3 |
Lowland Grassland Several patches of grassland at the flat area are found near Nam Hang,
adjacent to the foothill of Tai Shek Mo, and foothill of Cham Shan. Dominant plants of this resource are
common low-growing grasses and ferns, including Dicranopteris pedata, Paspalum conjugatum, Panicum repens, Palhinhaea
cernua, Baeckea frutescens and Urena
lobata. Trees such as Melia
azedarach, Sapium sebiferum and Acacia spp. also grow sparsely in the
area. Rhododendron mucronatum and Rhodendron pulchrum var. phoeniceum were founded in the small
piece grassland at southwest of Sandy Ridge. Those Rhododendron species are protected locally under Cap. 96 Forests
and Countryside Ordinance. Similar to LR2 (Shrubby Grassland on Hillside),
small portion of tree groups are fallen within this LR, mainly along the edge
of the area. However, its dominate planting are natural shrubs and grasses.
This LR can re-establish itself fairly easily and is therefore considered to
be relatively tolerant to change. Its sensitivity is medium.
|
Medium |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LR4 |
Riverside Vegetation Trees planting are found along the two sides of the river channel.
Grasscrete and low-maintenance grasses are found alongside to the Ng Tung
River. Trees species included: Acacia
auriculiformis, Acacia confusa, Acacia mangium, Albizia lebbeck, Leucaena leucocephala,
Sapium sebiferum. Trees are relatively in fair to poor form and they are
common species which can easily be found within the area, thus the
sensitivity is medium.
|
Medium |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LR5 |
Abandoned Fish Pond Abandoned fish ponds that are partly included in the 500m LIA
boundary. Two relatively large ponds are found at the eastern side of the
Project boundary. They retain water throughout the year including both the
dry and wet seasons. After being abandoned for several years, the ponds lack
management. The other water ponds are mainly located north of Sheung Shui
Water Treatment Works and beside the Sha Ling Livestock Waste Control Centre
but also at the northern base of Cheung Po Tau. They are generally scattered
in between the agricultural land. Their bunds are vegetated by grasses (e.g. Bidens alba, Panicum maximum and Alocasia odora) and low shrubs (e.g. Lantana camara), as well as some climbers (e.g. Mikania micrantha and Ipomoea cairica). The ponds are slightly overgrown with low landscape value, and are
relatively intolerant to change.
The sensitivity of this LR is considered to be medium.
|
Medium |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LR6 |
Rural Development This LR in the vicinity of the Project boundary refers to the rural
settlements along both sides of Man Kam To Road, Lo Wu Village, and extend to
the rural settlement at the foothill of Tai Shek Mo. Lo Wu Village contains
dense domestic houses that concentrate to the east of MTR Lo Wu Station. Most
of the houses are old although some have been replaced by modern housing
blocks of 2-3 storeys. Limited soft landscape treatment in this village
includes some trees and private amenity planting. The village also included a
school (Lo Wu Public School) in the north with an outdoor basketball court.
The arrangement of village houses along both sides of Man Kam To Road and the
foothill of Tai Shek Mo are rather loose, with winding paths running between
houses. Many houses are fenced with open courtyards in front and surrounded
by vegetation. Tree groups are found in piecemeal pattern, they are normally
formed within some boundary fence or in a small group within the rural
development. Fruit trees such as Dimocarpus
longan, Litchi chinensis, Annona squamosa and Carica papaya are commonly found near the houses. There are 2 no. of mature trees (with DBH ≥ 1m) within this LR, they are 1 no. of Ficus elastic and 1 no. of Bombax ceiba. They are naturally grown
along the existing roadside. This LR is dominated by domestic houses. Its landscape amenity,
significance and quality are moderate, and it is able to tolerate changes,
this LR was included combination of both young vegetation and mature trees,
therefore it overall importance and rarity is considered as medium, making
its sensitivity medium. Tree Groups distributed within this LR:
TG19, TG17, TG35, TG2002, TG2003, TG2005, TG2012, TG2015, TG2016, TG2031,
TG2033, TG2035, TG2036, TG2043, TG2044, TG2045, TG2046, TG2047, TG2052,
TG2054, TG2058, TG2064, TG2051, TG2050, TG2047, TG2042, TG2041, TG2039,
TG2038, TG2040, TG2037, TG2030, TG2029, TG2028, TG2020, TG2019, TG2027,
TG2023, TG2024, TG2025, TG2010, TG2060, TG2007, TG2062, TG2063, TG2065,
TG2066, TG2011, TG2013, TG2032
|
Medium |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LR7 |
Marsh and Wetland This LR refers to freshwater wetland landscape resources. Several
plots of marsh are located along the eastern sides of Ng Tung River, at the
foothill of Tai Shek Mo. This LR provide marsh habitat, mainly for wetland
dependent wildlife. As part of the habitat management, wetland plants and
riparian vegetation have been planted.
Based on the quality and the importance of the LR, it is considered
that the sensitivity of this LR is
medium.
|
Medium |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LR8 |
Lowland Woodland This LR refers to the maturity tree groups which are found within the
lowland plain area. Within the 500m LIA boundary, such tree groups are found
beyond southwest of the Project boundary, adjacent to the agricultural land,
and a small portion at the Man Kam To lowland, trees in this LR are mature
and medium to large size. Dominant tree species are Acacia confusa, Acacia auriculiformis, Celtis sinensis, Melaleuca
cajuputi subsp. cumingiana and Macaranga
tanarius var. tomentosa. This LR is relatively mature and has low ability to accommodate
change. Its sensitivity is considered to be high. Tree Groups distributed within this LR: TG2006, TG2007, TG2016, TG2023,
TG2025, TG2027, TG2055
|
High |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LR9 |
Wetland in Conservation Area Refers to part of the pond and marsh near Yuen Leng Chai, which are
gazetted as Conservation Area (CA) under the Draft Man Kam To Development Permission
Area Plan No. DPA/NE-MKT/3. The dominant wetland plant species colonising
this LR include Phragmites australis,
Brachiaria mutica, Cyperus flabelliformis, Commelina diffusa, Cyclosorus
interruptus and Fimbristylis spp.
The wetland was originally created as an ecological mitigation area
associated with the previous Shenzhen River regulation works, but it is now
in a relatively natural condition and intolerant to changes. This distinctive
LR is therefore considered to have high
sensitivity.
|
High |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LR10 |
MacIntosh Fort Refers to the Grade 2 historic building on the hilltop of Sandy Ridge
to safeguard the border of Hong Kong against illegal immigrants in the past. This observation post is
no longer functional and is enclosed by fence. Grasses and climbers (e.g. Bidens
pilosa, Youngia japonica, Lygodium japonicum and Ageratum conyzoides) overgrow on the ground outside the post in
the fenced area. This LR has cultural significance and high landscape value.
It was a man-made structure and still has a reasonable capacity to
accommodate change. This LR is considered to have high sensitivity.
|
High |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LR11 |
Agricultural Land This LR refers to land used for agriculture including crops and orchards
as well as ornamental plant nurseries, it is generally found beyond southwest
of the Project boundary. This LR contains a small number of structures such
as small irrigation ponds, green houses, equipment sheds and small / narrow
hard paved areas. It not only contains agricultural vegetation but also some
scattered non-agricultural vegetation including some shrubs and trees. It is
often an intermediary between areas of development and natural areas. This habitat type includes both active and inactive agricultural lands
in the south of Lo Wu Station Road, active and inactive agricultural lands
are scattered randomly and some of those are periodically farmed. Those
active agricultural lands are on the east side of Sha Ling Road, and the
plant nurseries and orchards are scattered within existing villages in the
assessment area, notably along the Lin Ma Hang Road. Tree groups are found in
piecemeal pattern, within the agricultural. Some of the active farmland were
acting as important role for the residents in the village, however, it is
found that not all of the agricultural land were operated actively. All of
these agricultural lands are located outside of the Project boundary and
heavily disturbed / managed by existing villagers. Its significance and quality are moderate, and the maturity and
importance of this LR are medium. Agricultural farmland can be easily found
within North District, they are normally scattered adjacent with villages, in
which some were abandoned, its importance, rarity and significant are
considered as medium. Its sensitivity is hence considered to be medium. Tree Groups distributed within this LR:
TG2003, TG2004, TG2006, TG2007, TG2008, TG2009, TG2010, TG2011, TG2012,
TG2014, TG2016, TG2017, TG2030, TG2037, TG2039, TG2041, TG2046, TG2050,
TG2051, TG2052, TG2053, TG2054, TG2056, TG2057, TG2060, TG2062, TG2063
|
Medium |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LR12 |
Cemetery Refers to areas where large number of headstones or other monuments made of granite and similar materials rise vertically above the ground and
cluster either along natural hillsides or on man-made terraces. This LR
receives relatively intensive human influences especially during Ching Ming
and Chung Yeung Festivals. Only limited vegetation grows among graves and the
dominant species are grasses and climbers including Dicranopteris
pedata, Bidens pilosa, Helicteres angustifolia and Smilax china. Small
trees such as Thuja orientalis were
occasionally found planted in close vicinity of graves for an ornamental
purpose to increase the area¡¦s amenity value. Despite the predominance of
man-made structures of this LR, some of the graves have been existed in the
place for decades and only have a low to
medium capacity to tolerate change.
Its sensitivity is hence considered to be medium. Tree Groups distributed within this LR:
TG06, TG10, TG32, TG33, TG34, TG35, TG38
|
Medium |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LR13 |
Vegetation at Engineered Slope Engineered cut slope is formed at the foothill of Sandy Ridge adjacent
to MTR Lo Wu Station, and along Lo Wu Station Road. Some grasses and shrubs
are growing on the rock surface and they are lack of maintenance. Small
amount of trees are found at some slope with tree rings. The quality of such
LR is low, and its overall sensitivity is considered as low.
|
Low |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LR14 |
Natural Water Stream These natural streams come from the uphill of Sandy Ridge and flow down
to the lowland rural area at Lo Wu. They are not perennial streams and water
flow may cease during the dry season. The banks of these streams are
overgrown with common grasses, particularly in the upstream sections where
they flow through extensive grasslands. The downstream will run through to
the channel along the man-made engineered slope. Its sensitivity is
considered to be high. Due to its habitat value and the importance of the stream which supporting
the ecological habitats adjacent. Its sensitivity is considered to be high.
|
High |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LR15 |
Channelized River Refers to small sections of Shenzhen River and Ng Tung River, which are
two modified watercourses located to the north and west of the Project
boundary respectively. The two watercourses have been widened or channelized
in phases for drainage improvement in northwest New Territories since 1990s.
This LR is characterised by its engineered nature and straightening of the
river banks with concrete, stone or grasscrete, as well as the associated
paths and maintenance accesses. The vegetation mainly consists of grasses and
shrubs, but also includes trees that grow spontaneously such as Bombax ceiba and the weedy species Leucaena leucocephala. This LR is one
of the scenic elements in the local landscape context, but is reasonably
capable of accommodating changes.
Its sensitivity is considered to be medium.
|
Medium |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LR16 |
Transportation Corridor This LR refers to those landscape resources found within sections of
the MTRC East Rail and Man Kam To Road, as well as those transportation facilities
includes traffic control points. The MTRC East Rail leading to MTR Lo Wu
Station runs north-south to the west of the Project boundary and Man Kam To
Road runs southwest-northeast to the south of the Project boundary. While no
significant planting is found along the railway, trees along Man Kam To Road
include both common roadside planting species (e.g. Bombax ceiba, Eucalyptus citriodora and Ficus microcarpa) and naturally growing species (e.g. Macaranga tanarius var. tomentosa, Celtis
sinensis and the weedy species Leucaena
leucocephala). Man-made and concrete form structure and road pavement are
dominant within this LR, although roadside plantings are found in most
sections of transportation corridor, they are common species and planted
adjacent to heavy traffic, in which some lack maintenance. This LR has a
man-made nature with low to moderate landscape value and a high ability to
accommodate changes. Its sensitivity is considered to be low.
|
Low |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LR17 |
Vegetation along Utility Facilities This LR refers to vegetation growth along the major utility facilities
along Man Kam To Road. Only some abandon grasses and scrub are found along
the utility pipes. No significant planting is found. This resource has a man-made
nature with low to medium landscape value and a high ability to accommodate
changes. Its sensitivity is
considered to be low.
|
Low |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LR18 |
Pumping Station This LR refers to the vegetation growth within the Muk Wu Pumping Station.
Several tree stands are scattered at the planting area in between the
buildings. The rest of the landscaping area is mostly grasses with low
amenity value and lack of maintenance. This landscape resource is considered
low amenity value and high ability to accommodate changes. Its sensitivity is
considered to be low.
|
Low |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LR19 |
Plantation The plantation LR within the assessment area was found both along the
hillside and the area with planted trees and shrubs in close proximity of
disturbed areas, such as cemeteries as well as along main roads (e.g. Sha
Ling Road and Lo Wu Station Road). This LR generally had a semi-closed canopy
at a relatively uniform height of about five to eight metres and was
extensively planted with the exotic tree species. The plantation at upland is
relatively young with open canopies and the plantation along the toes is
relatively more mature. There are also some graves and cemeteries found inside
the plantation. Compared with the woodland on hillside, this LR has a more
regular shape in terms of tree size and is more uniform in tree species. Trees growing in this LR have average
heights ranging from 3 to 8 m.
Most of the trees species are exotic, including Lophostemon confertus, Acacia
confusa, Acacia auriculiformis,
Melaleuca quinquenervia and Delonix regia. Nevertheless, native
species such as Cinnamomum camphora
and Liquidambar formosana can also
be found planted in this LR. Aquilaria
sinensis was recorded in the plantation area next to the road leading to
Border District Police Headquarters and Division Police Station. Two Aquilaria sinensis were recorded from
the roadside plantation at the eastern end of the Lin Ma Hang Road. This LR is mostly found adjacent to the woodland, with similar
maturity at some area. However, it is considered that the value of the LR is
relatively lower than the natural woodland. The sensitivity is considered to
be medium. Tree Groups distributed within this LR: TG21,
TG14, TG15, TG16, TG18, TG15, TG13, TG10, TG06, TG05, TG03, TG01, TG29, TG32,
TG38, TG2038, TG2030, TG2028, TG2026, TG2020, TG2021, TG2027, TG2023, TG2024,
TG2025, TG2015, TG2035, TG2036
|
Medium |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LR20 |
Active Fish Pond There are two large active fish ponds between Shenzhen River and the
Project boundary. It is currently maintained by AFCD. This LR is considered
have medium landscape value, and it has low ability to accommodate change.
The sensitivity is therefore considered as high.
|
High |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LR21 |
Wet Woodland The wet woodland is located to the north of the Project
boundary, and is confined by the marsh area to the north and the woodland to
the east, south and south-west parts. Due to the low topography of this wet
woodland, it is fed by the seasonal watercourses flowing from the valleys of
Sandy Ridge, and the rain water is then collected at the gully of the hill to
feed the wet woodland. Water from this woodland is hydrologically connected
with the marsh and mitigation ponds to the north of the wet woodland. A
number of mature trees C. nervosum and
Acronychia pedunculata form the
tree canopy in this wet woodland, with numerous seedlings of C. nervosum, and other self-sown
shrubs (including Psychotria asiatica,
Ligustrum sinense, G. lanceolarium and L. rotundifolia var. oblongifolia) and trees (including A. dioica and Litsea monopetala). Common grass species I. sinicus were found in large clumps along the seasonal
watercourse within the wet woodland. This LR is mature and has
low ability to accommodate change.
Its sensitivity is considered to be high. Tree Groups distributed within this LR:
TG31, TG30
|
High |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LCA1 |
Upland and Hillside Landscape Within the Project boundary of Sandy Ridge and its adjacent 500m LIA
boundary, this LCA encompasses the Sandy Ridge upland (reaching 128mPD),
northern portion of Cham Shan, and western portion of Tai Shek Mo. The
natural upland is far away from the human activities. Wildfire was happen
several times and affected its appearance and vegetation value in Sandy Ridge
before. Woodland are also form within this LCA, it formed as dense and mature
appearance distribute at the foothill and natural stream area. They grow with
rich nutrition from the stream. Woodlands in these areas predominantly border
uphill grassland/shrubland areas and sometimes adjoin plantation areas. The
topography of the upland in the vicinity formed natural boundary surrounding
Sandy Ridge site. Historical significant building ¡¥Maclntosh Fort¡¦ is found
at the uphill of the Sandy Ridge upland. This LCA is predominantly natural and of high quality. It is a
significant LCA within the Study Area and has a low tolerance to change. Therefore its sensitivity is
considered to be high.
|
High
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LCA2 |
Rural Inland Plain Landscape This LCA refers to rural village areas on the fringe of the extensive
natural vegetated hillsides. It is dominated by small and medium sized
villages with modern and traditional domestic houses, interspersed with
fragmented agricultural plots and comprises a broad mix of other land uses
including water ponds, schools, sports grounds and open storages. This LCA
also has some patches of woodland as well as vegetation associated with the
villages. Within the 500m buffer this LCA is mainly found at the foothill of
Tai Shek Mo, to the east of MTR Lo Wu Station and along both sides of Man Kam
To Road. This LCA is considered to have medium tolerance to change and
moderate amenity value. Its sensitivity is therefore medium.
|
Medium
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LCA3 |
Cemetery Landscape Refers to significant areas designated as cemetery in the northwest
and southwest of the Project boundary.
This LCA is located at low lying hills with grassland and scrubland
that contain a large number of graves concentrated throughout in a stepped
pattern. The landscape serves social interest but does not have high
landscape value given the propensity for hill fires started during
traditional festivals. Therefore the sensitivity of this LCA is considered to
be medium.
|
Medium
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LCA4 |
Major Transportation Corridor Landscape Two major transportation corridors are found within the 500m LIA
boundary, they are the general MTRC East Rail and its associated facilities,
and Man Kam To Road at the south of the Project boundary. This LCA includes
the station and boundary crossing at Lo Wu. Screening roadsides trees are found along most major road corridors.
It is considered to be highly tolerant to changes, however, due to the
roadsides planting and the existing greenery of the riverfront, its
sensitivity is medium.
|
Medium
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LCA5 |
Institutional Landscape This LCA is found along the foothill of Cham Shan, namely the Border
District Police Headquarter, Sha Ling Livestock Waste Control Centre and San
Uk Ling Holding Centre. This LCA is considered to have medium tolerance to change and moderate
amenity value. Its sensitivity is
therefore medium.
|
Medium
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LCA6 |
Major Watercourse Corridor Landscape This LCA refers to modified watercourses channelized with concrete,
stone or grasscrete and also includes some walkways along the watercourse and
the vegetation associated with the watercourse, both within the channel and
along the banks. Within the 500m buffer this LCA includes two short sections
of the Shenzhen River and the Ng Tung River. The landscape amenity and
significance of this LCA are medium. Due to its partially artificial state,
it is relatively tolerant to change and its sensitivity is considered to be medium.
|
Medium
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LCA7 |
Rural Agricultural This LCA
refers to land used for agriculture including crops and orchards as well as
ornamental plant nurseries, it is generally found beyond southwest of the
Project boundary. This LCA generally formed at plain rural area, with mixture
of human activities. This LCA is predominantly mixture of natural and
artificial. It is a significant LCA within the Study Area and has a medium
tolerance to change. Therefore its sensitivity is considered to be medium.
|
Medium
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Siu Lam Barging Point
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It is considered that the existing landscape
baseline study of the barging point at Siu Lam is the same as the baseline
condition stated in the approved Expressed Rail Link EIA report
(AEIAR-143/2009).
|
11.5.2 Tree Survey
11.5.2.1
To minimize conflicts with existing vegetation, a full tree
survey within the works area has been undertaken in 2014 in accordance with
DEVB TCW No. 07/2015, and the tree survey plan is given in Appendix 11.1.
11.5.2.2
For the area outside the works area but within the 500m assessment
area, broad brush tree group survey has been undertaken that will not be
directly affected by the proposed works. The broad brush tree group survey,
corresponding photographs and layout plans are given in Appendix 11.2. For any inaccessible area case,
broad brush tree group survey has been taken by the observation from the
adjacent location.
11.5.2.3
Within the works area, all living trees with a stem diameter
over 95mm measured at a point 1.3m above the ground level (hereafter referred
to as the DBH) are included in the Tree Survey as defined in the Nature
Conservation Practice Note No. 02 (Rev. June 2006) issued by Agriculture,
Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD).
11.5.2.4
Approximately 2,700 nos. of
individual trees are found within the works area. They were mainly in natural
form, in which species Lophostemon confertus are dominant within the project boundary.
11.6.1.1
The Project is located in the north east New Territories, in
a rural area bordering Mainland China and specifically Shenzhen City. HKSAR is
divided from Shenzhen by the Shenzhen River which is wide in this area and has
been channelized. There is little
development currently in the area, apart from the Lo Wu Boundary Control Point,
and Police Post at Man Kam To, as well as scattered rural villages. The area is
largely contained by nearby hills such as Tai Shek Mo to the west, Cheung Po
Tau in the north and Kong Nga Po to the east. To the north in stark contrast to HKSAR,
lies the city of Shenzhen characterised by high rise modern buildings and is
highly urban in nature. The high
rise buildings here contain the view to the site from the north.
11.6.1.2
Visual envelope of the Project is bounded by the ridgeline
from Tai Shek Mo to the west, Cham Shan to the south and Lo Shue Ling to the
east. The Visual envelope and VSRs of the Project are illustrated in Figure
11.4.1. Representative
photographs of each VSR are given in Figures 11.5.1 to 11.5.4. Table 11.5 summarises the sensitivity
assessment of each VSR group.
VSR R1
11.6.1.3
Refers to residents of a small number of villages and
residencies along either side of Man Kam To Road. These residents are generally
within vegetated areas and currently enjoy a good rural view. Given the natural
topography of Sandy Ridge as well as this natural vegetation, some will not
have views of the Project and those that do will only get partial views. Given the nature of residential VSRs,
this group is considered to have high sensitivity.
VSR R2
11.6.1.4
Refers to residents of San Uk Ling. These residents enjoy
some good rural views but in the direction of the Project, have Man Kam To Road
in the foreground with a lorry park up area. Sandy Ridge can be seen in the
background with a partial view of the site and given the nature of residential
VSRs, this group is considered to have high sensitivity.
VSR R3
11.6.1.5
Refers to residents of Lo Wu Village. These villagers
actually face away from the main Project boundary, which is also blocked from
their view by the natural topography of Sandy Ridge. There are trees within
this village which partially block views from the houses and their existing
view would take in Lo Wu Boundary Control Point in the background. Overall this VSR group is considered to
have high sensitivity.
VSR R4
11.6.1.6
Refers to residents of Muk Wu. These residents enjoy some
good rural views and in the direction of the Project, Sandy Ridge is visible as
the green hill in the background. Their views towards the Project are distant
and partial at best, but given the nature of residential VSRs, this group is
considered to have high sensitivity overall.
VSR R5
11.6.1.7
Refers to residents of villages along Foothill of Tai Shek
Mo. These residents are located along the foothill of Tai Shek Mo, and Sandy
Ridge is visible as the green hill at the eastern side. Their views towards the
Project are distant, and being blocked by the existing topography, but given
the nature of residential VSRs, this group is considered to have high
sensitivity.
VSR R6
11.6.1.8
Refers to residents of Muk Wu Nga Yiu. These residents enjoy
good rural views and are located far away from the Project. Their views towards
the site formation are distant but they are close to the Lin Ma Hang Road
widening section. Given the nature of residential VSRs, this group is
considered to have high sensitivity.
VSR GIC1
11.6.1.9
Refers to workers in the Border District Police Headquarters
near at south of Man Kam To Road. These workers have a fairly contained outlook
within the headquarters but from higher elevations of the buildings have good
views north of Sandy Ridge with the occasional top of a high rise building in
Shenzhen in the background. Their existing quality of view is good but they
will only get partial views towards the Project. Overall this group of VSRs is
considered to have medium sensitivity.
VSR GIC2
11.6.1.10 Refers to workers at
Water Treatment Works near south of Sandy Ridge adjacent to the utility
facilities along Man Kam To Road. These workers have limited view towards the
proposed site. The workers will rarely have view outside due to its working
space condition. Overall this group of VSRs is considered to have low
sensitivity.
VSR GIC3
11.6.1.11 Refers to workers at
Man Kam To Pumping Station adjacent to the western side of Man Kam To Boundary
Control Point. These workers have limited and distant view towards the proposed
site. The workers will rarely have view outside due to its working space
condition. Overall this group of VSRs is considered to have low
sensitivity.
VSR GIC4
11.6.1.12 Refers to workers in
the Lo Wu Correctional Institution located at the foothill of Tai Shek Mo.
These workers have a fairly contained outlook within their working area, they
have views existing views of the dense vegetation and hillsides view of Tai
Shek Mo. Their existing quality of view is good but they will only get glimpse
views towards the Project. Overall this group of VSRs is considered to have
medium sensitivity.
VSR T1
11.6.1.13 Refers to travellers
on the East Rail Line. These viewers will only get occasional, glimpse views
towards the site at best. Also considering the transient nature of this VSR
group and the speed with which trains travel, it is considered to have low
sensitivity.
VSR T2
11.6.1.14 Refers to travellers
in public / private vehicles, travelling along Man Kam To Road. These viewers
currently have fair rural views but traffic in general is travelling at a
considerable speed and views to the main Project boundary would be occasional
and glimpse at best. Views of the new Access Road would be full at the
intersections but overall this group of VSRs is considered to have low
sensitivity.
VSR I1
11.6.1.15 Refers to workers at
storage area along Man Kam To Road. These viewers currently have fair rural
views towards the existing village¡¦s settings. In general the workers will
rarely have views to the main Project boundary. Overall this group of VSRs is
considered to have low sensitivity.
Siu Lam Barging Point
11.6.1.16 It is considered that the key VSRs and the visual baseline condition of barging point in Siu Lam are the same with the approved Expressed Rail Link EIA report (AEIAR-143/2009).
Table 11.5
Visually Sensitive Receivers and their sensitivity to change
VSR No. |
VSR |
Number of Individuals (Many/Medium/Few) |
Quality of
Existing View (Good/Fair/Poor) |
Availability
of Alternative Views (Yes/No) |
Degree
of Visibility (Full/ Partial/ Glimpse) |
Duration
of View (Long/ Medium/ Short) |
Frequency
of View (Frequent/ Occasional/ Rare) |
Sensitivity to Change (Low,
Medium, High) |
R1 |
Residents of Villages along
Man Kam To Road |
Few |
Good |
Yes |
Partial |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
R2 |
Residents of San Uk Ling |
Few |
Good |
Yes |
Partial |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
R3 |
Residents of Lo Wu Village |
Few |
Good |
Yes |
Glimpse |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
R4 |
Residents of Muk Wu |
Few |
Good |
Yes |
Partial |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
R5 |
Residents of Villages along
Foothill of Tai Shek Mo |
Few |
Good |
Yes |
Glimpse |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
R6 |
Residents of Muk Wu Nga Yiu |
Few |
Good |
Yes |
Partial |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
GIC1 |
Workers in Border District
Police Headquarters |
Few |
Good |
Yes |
Partial |
Medium |
Occasional |
Medium |
GIC2 |
Workers at Water Treatment
Works |
Few |
Good |
Yes |
Glimpse |
Medium |
Rare |
Low |
GIC3 |
Workers at Man Kam To
Pumping Station |
Few |
Good |
Yes |
Glimpse |
Medium |
Rare |
Low |
GIC4 |
Workers at Lo Wu Correctional
Institution |
Few |
Good |
Yes |
Glimpse |
Medium |
Occasional |
Medium |
T1 |
Travellers along East Rail
Line |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
Partial |
Short |
Rare |
Low |
T2 |
Travellers along Man Kam To
Road |
Medium |
Fair |
Yes |
Full |
Short |
Rare |
Low |
I1 |
Workers at Storage area along Man Kam To
Road |
Few |
Fair |
Yes |
Glimpse |
Medium |
Rare |
Low |
Note: R = Residential; GIC = Government/Institution/Community, I =
Industrials, T = Transport related
11.6.1.17 Figure 11.4.1 also shows the
location of the Vantage Points (VPs) within the HKSAR, which will be used as
points from which to make up photomontages to help illustrate the visual impact
of the Project, and it has been incorporated in the report. The VPs are
described as below:
 VP1 ¡V Sha Ling Road: To represent the residential VSRs along Man Kam To Road, which is the closest residential VSR to the proposed development;
 VP2 ¡V Man Kam To Road: To represent the residential VSRs along Man Kam To Road, which is the closest residential VSR to the proposed development;
 VP3 ¡V San Uk Ling: To represent the residential VSRs along Man Kam To Road, which is the closest residential VSR to the proposed development;
 VP4 ¡V MacIntosh Fort: To represent the view point for the overall view the proposed development;
 VP5 ¡V Villages along foothill of Tai Shek Mo: To represent the VSR at the western side;
 VP6 ¡V San Uk Ling: To represent the view point for the VSR adjacent to Lin Ma Hang road widening section; and
 VP7 ¡V Residential area at the foothill of eastern side of Sandy Ridge: To represent the view point for the VSR, which will have the closest view towards proposed viaduct.
11.7.1 Impact Prediction
11.7.1.1 The Project will have various visual impacts during construction and operational phases. The proposed development will create varying levels of impact on the VSRs and visual amenity of the area at different stages of its lifetime as outlined below.
11.7.1.2 During the construction phase, potential landscape and visual impacts may arise from the site formation works and associated facilities.
Direct Impacts of Works
 site formation for the proposed C&C Facilities at Sandy Ridge Cemetery (including the proposed pick-up and drop-off area for shuttle buses);
 upgrading of Existing Sha Ling Road;
 construction of new road connecting Crematorium site and Man Kam To Road (a short viaduct section and a roundabout);
 construction of internal roads for C&C Facilities;
 associated geotechnical works for site formation and road network;
 construction of noise barriers along the improved Sha Ling Road;
 junction modification works for Man Kam To Road / Sha Ling Road;
 construction of new junction at Man Kam To Road for the new road connection to Crematorium site;
 construction of the pick-up and drop-off point at Man Kam To Road; and
 widening of Lin Ma Hang Road (from Man Kam To Road to Ping Yuen River) including the construction of noise barriers and the associated geotechnical works; and
 Barging point at Siu Lam.
Indirect Impacts of Works
 dust during dry weather, which will affect the planting health located adjacent to the construction site during construction period;
 after dark lighting and welding; and
 construction traffic.
Direct Impacts of works by other project(s) after the handover of platform
 construction of the Columbarium buildings and associated facilities with maximum height of 84mPD; and
 construction of the Crematorium buildings and associated facilities with maximum height of 74mPD.
11.7.1.3 During the operational phase, potential visual impacts would be related
to the following:
 operation of new road and associates facilities.
11.7.1.4 Further mitigation measures may be proposed, as appropriate, to reduce potential landscape impacts of the Project. Mitigation measures follow the principles of first avoiding impacts by all means feasible, then reducing any unavoidable impacts to as low as practically possible and finally mitigating any remaining impacts.
11.7.1.5 A summary of the landscape impacts of the proposed works during construction phase is given in Table 11.6.
11.7.2 Landscape Impacts Before Mitigation
11.7.2.1 The Project will have various landscape impacts during construction and operation. The proposed development will create varying levels of impact on the LRs of the area as outlined below.
Table 11.6 Landscape impacts and its existing trees and protected plant species during construction of the
proposed works during construction phase
ID No. |
Landscape
Resources/Landscape Character Areas |
Source of Impact |
Description
of Impacts |
Trees within
Each LR (Dominant Species/Notes) |
Precious or
Protected Plant Species to be affected by the Project within Each LR |
Approximate
Quantity of Trees Affected by the Project within Each LR |
LR1.1 |
Hillside
Woodland Distribute at Valley |
Direct Impacts 
site formation of land for proposed C&C
Facilitates at Sandy Ridge; and 
associated geotechnical works for site formation
and road network. Indirect Impacts 
dust during dry weather, which will affect the planting
health located adjacent to the construction site during construction period |

a small portion of hillside woodland (approx. 0.8
ha) will be directly affected by the site formation platform and new formed
slope; and 
the impacts are long term and the change is
irreversible. |
Celtis
sinensis ¦µ¾ð |

Nil |
Within Sandy Ridge site: 150
nos. |
LR1.2 |
Hillside
Woodland along toe of Upland |
Direct Impacts 
upgrading of existing Sha Ling Road; and 
construction of new road connecting crematorium
site and Man Kam To Road Indirect Impacts 
dust during dry weather, which will affect the planting
health located adjacent to the construction site during construction period |

a portion of hillside woodland (approx. 0.27 ha)
will be directly affected by the proposed roadwork; 
the impacts are long term and the change is
irreversible. |
Macaranga tanarius var. tomentosa ¦å®ä Ficus hispida ¹ï¸º_ Celtis sinensis ¦µ¾ðCinnamomum camphora ¼ÌSchefflera
heptaphylla Àn¸}¤ì |
Tree: Aquilaria sinensis 1 no. 
0.22m DBH growing on slope surface |
Within Sandy Ridge site: 365
nos. Lin Ma Hang Section: 45 nos. |
LR1.3 |
Exposed Uphill
Woodland |

Nil |

Nil |
Acacia confuse ¥xÆW¬Û«ä Dimocarpus longan Às²´ Celtis sinensis ¦µ¾ð Machilus pauhoi §Sªá¼í·£ |

Nil |

Nil |
LR2.1 |
Uphill Shrubby
Grassland |
Direct Impacts 
site formation of land for proposed C&C
Facilities at Sandy Ridge Cemetery; 
upgrading of existing Sha Ling Road; and 
associated geotechnical works for site formation
and road network. Indirect Impacts 
dust during dry weather, which will affect the
planting health located adjacent to the construction site during construction
period. |

A large portion of grassland (approx. 13.4 ha)
will be permanently affected due to the cutting on the hillside by site
formation works; and 
The impacts are long term and the change is
irreversible.. |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |
LR2.2 |
Foothill and
Middle hill Shrubby Grassland |
Direct Impacts 
site formation of land for proposed C&C
Facilities at Sandy Ridge Cemetery; 
upgrading of existing Sha Ling Road; and 
associated geotechnical works for site formation
and road network. Indirect
Impacts 
dust during dry weather, which will affect the
planting health located adjacent to the construction site during construction
period. |

A portion of grassland (approx. 1.8 ha) will be
permanently affected due to the cutting on the hillside by site formation works;
and 
The impacts are long term and the change is
irreversible. |

Nil |
Shrub: Arundina graminifolia Habenaria
dentata |

Nil |
LR2.3 |
Crest Hill
Shrubby Grassland |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |
LR3 |
Lowland
Grassland |
Direct Impacts 
Widening of Lin Ma Hang Road (from Man Kam To
Road to Ping Yuen River) including the construction of noise barriers and the
associated geotechnical works. Indirect Impacts 
dust during dry weather, which will affect the
planting health located adjacent to the construction site during construction
period |

a small portion of lowland grassland (approx.
0.02ha) will be affected by the road widening of Lin Ma Hang road; and 
The scale of development is relatively small and
the impact is permanent. |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |
LR4 |
Riverside
Vegetation |

Nil |

Nil |
Acacia confusa ¥xÆW¬Û«ä Leucaena leucocephala »È¦XÅw |

Nil |

Nil |
LR5 |
Abandoned Fish
Pond |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |
LR6 |
Rural
Development |
Direct Impacts 
upgrading of existing Sha Ling Road; 
construction of new road connecting Crematorium
site and Man Kam To Road; and 
widening of Lin Ma Hang Road. Indirect Impacts 
dust during dry weather, which will affect the
planting health located adjacent to the construction site during construction
period. |

small portion of this LR will be affected
(approx. 0.5ha) by the roadwork. Existing local road will be upgraded; the
edges of the rural development will be offset; and 
dust will cause adverse impact to the
surrounding. |
Bombax ceiba
¤ì´Ö |

Nil |
Within Sandy Ridge site: 55
nos. Lin Ma Hang Section: 85 nos. |
LR7 |
Marsh and
Wetland |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |
LR8 |
Lowland
Woodland |

Nil |

Nil |
Acacia
confuse ¥xÆW¬Û«ä |

Nil |

Nil |
LR9 |
Wetland in
Conservation Area |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |
LR10 |
MacIntosh Fort |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |
LR11 |
Agricultural
Land |
Indirect Impacts 
dust during dry weather, which will affect the
planting health located adjacent to the construction site during construction
period. |

dust will cause adverse impact to the
surrounding; and 
The impact will be short term under
construction phase. |
Leucaena
leucocephala »È¦XÅw |

Nil |

Nil |
LR12 |
Cemetery |

Nil |

Nil |
Bauhinia
spp. ¬v¿á¥ÒÄÝ |

Nil |

Nil |
LR13 |
Vegetation at
Engineered Slope |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |
LR14 |
Natural Water
Stream |
Direct Impacts 
site formation of land for proposed C&C
Facilitates at Sandy Ridge; 
upgrading of existing Sha Ling Road; 
associated geotechnical works for site formation and
road network; and 
construction of new road connecting crematorium
site and Man Kam To Road. |

Some sections of natural water stream will
be lost by the proposed Sha Ling roadworks and the western part of the
proposed site formation platform. 
Some sections of the natural water stream
at the eastern side of Sandy Ridge will be spanned in part by a viaduct
connecting the eastern platforms with the eastern connection road, and there
would be associated shading effects. |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |
LR15 |
Channelized
River |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |
LR16 |
Transportation
Corridor |
Direct Impacts 
upgrading of existing Sha Ling Road; and 
widening of Lin Ma Hang Road (from Man Kam To
Road to Ping Yuen River) including the construction of noise barriers and the
associated geotechnical works. |

approx. 1400 m long of existing Lin Ma Hang
road will be widening to support the traffic flow; and 
the scale of development is medium and the
impact is permanent. |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |
LR17 |
Vegetation
along Utility Facilities |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |
LR18 |
Pumping
Station |

Nil |

Nil |
Artocarpus
heterophyllus µÔÅÚ»e |

Nil |

Nil |
LR19
|
Plantation
|
Direct Impacts 
site formation of land for proposed C&C
Facilities at Sandy Ridge Cemetery ; 
upgrading of Existing Sha Ling Road 
associated geotechnical works for site formation
and road network 
construction of new road connecting Crematorium
site and Man Kam To Road Indirect Impacts 
dust
during dry weather, which will affect the planting health located
adjacent to the construction site during construction period |

A portion of hillside plantation (approx.
1.4 ha) will be directly affected by the proposed roadwork and site formation
platform. 
The impacts are long term and the change is
irreversible. |
Acacia
auriculiformis ¦ÕªG¬Û«ä |

Nil |
Within Sandy Ridge site: 600
nos. |
LR20
|
Active Fish Pond
|

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |

Nil |
LR21
|
Wet Woodland
|
Indirect Impacts 
dust during dry weather, which will affect the
planting health located adjacent to the construction site during construction
period |

the construction work might cause dust
during dry weather which will affect the health of the plant. |
Acronychia
pedunculata ¤sªo¬a |

Nil |

Nil |
LCA1 |
Upland and
Hillside Landscape |
Direct Impacts 
site formation of land for proposed C&C
Facilities at Sandy Ridge Cemetery; 
upgrading of existing Sha Ling Road; 
associated geotechnical works for site formation and
road network; and 
construction of new road connecting Crematorium
site and Man Kam To Road. Indirect Impacts 
dust
during dry weather, which will affect the planting health located
adjacent to the construction site during construction period. |

a portion of upland (approx. 14.6ha) will be
directly affected by site formation platform. The existing topography will be
changed permanently by cut and fill site formation works; and 
the impacts are long term and the change is
irreversible. |

N.A. |

N.A. |

N.A. |
LCA2 |
Rural Inland
Plain Landscape |
Direct Impacts 
upgrading of existing Sha Ling Road; and 
widening of Lin Ma Hang Road (from Man Kam To
Road to Ping Yuen River) including the construction of noise barriers and the
associated geotechnical works. Indirect Impacts 
dust during dry weather, which will affect the
planting health located adjacent to the construction site during construction
period. |

small portion (approx. 0.5ha) of this LCA will be
affected by the road work; however, its overall setting of the landscape character
will not have significant change. |

N.A. |

N.A. |

N.A. |
LCA3 |
Cemetery
Landscape |

Nil |

Nil |

N.A. |

N.A. |

N.A. |
LCA4 |
Major
Transportation Corridor Landscape |
Direct Impacts 
widening of Lin Ma Hang Road (from Man Kam To
Road to Ping Yuen River) including the construction of noise barriers and the
associated geotechnical works. |

approx. 1400 m long of existing Lin Ma Hang
transportation corridor will be widened. However, the generally landscape
character and formation of this LCA will not change. |

N.A. |

N.A. |

N.A. |
LCA5 |
Institutional
Landscape |

Nil |

Nil |

N.A. |

N.A. |

N.A. |
LCA6 |
Major
Watercourse Corridor Landscape |

Nil |

Nil |

N.A. |

N.A. |

N.A. |
LCA7 |
Rural
Agricultural |

Nil |

Nil |

N.A. |

N.A. |

N.A. |
Table 11.7 Magnitude
of Impact of Landscape Resources and Landscape Character Areas
ID No. |
Landscape Resources / Landscape Character
Areas |
Compatibility
with the surrounding (Good/Fair/Poor) |
Duration of Impact (Long/Medium/Short) |
Scale of development (Large/Medium/Small) |
Reversibility of change (Yes/No) |
Magnitude of Impact (Large/Intermediate/Small/Negligible) |
|||||
Const. |
Oper. |
Const. |
Oper. |
Const. |
Oper. |
Const. |
Oper. |
Const. |
Oper. |
||
LR1.1 |
Hillside Woodland
Distribute at Valley |
Poor |
Poor |
Medium |
Long |
Medium |
Medium |
No |
No |
Large |
Large |
LR1.2 |
Hillside Woodland along
toe of Upland |
Fair |
Fair |
Medium |
Long |
Medium |
Small |
No |
No |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
LR1.3 |
Exposed Uphill Woodland |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR2.1 |
Uphill Shrubby Grassland |
Fair |
Fair |
Medium |
Long |
Large |
Large |
No |
No |
Large |
Large |
LR2.2 |
Foothill and Middle hill
Shrubby Grassland |
Fair |
Fair |
Medium |
Long |
Medium |
Medium |
No |
No |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
LR2.3 |
Crest Hill Shrubby
Grassland |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR3 |
Lowland Grassland |
Fair |
Fair |
Short |
Long |
Small |
Small |
No |
No |
Small |
Small |
LR4 |
Riverside Vegetation |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR5 |
Abandoned Fish Pond |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR6 |
Rural Development |
Fair |
Fair |
Medium |
Long |
Small |
Small |
Yes |
Yes |
Small |
Small |
LR7 |
Marsh and Wetland |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR8 |
Lowland Woodland |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR9 |
Wetland in Conservation
Area |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR10 |
MacIntosh Fort |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR11 |
Agricultural Land |
Fair |
N/A |
Short |
N/A |
Small |
N/A |
Yes |
N/A |
Small |
Negligible |
LR12 |
Cemetery |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR13 |
Vegetation at Engineered
Slope |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR14 |
Natural Water Stream |
Fair |
Fair |
Medium |
Long |
Small |
Small |
No |
No |
Small |
Small |
LR15 |
Channelized River |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR16 |
Transportation Corridor |
Good |
Good |
Medium |
Long |
Large |
Large |
Yes |
Yes |
Large |
Large |
LR17 |
Vegetation along Utility
Facilities |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR18 |
Pumping Station |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR19 |
Plantation |
Poor |
Poor |
Medium |
Long |
Large |
Large |
No |
No |
Large |
Large |
LR20 |
Active Fish Pond |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR21 |
Wet Woodland |
Fair |
N/A |
Short |
N/A |
Small |
N/A |
Yes |
N/A |
Small |
Negligible |
LCA1 |
Upland and
Hillside Landscape |
Fair |
Fair |
Medium |
Long |
Large |
Large |
No |
No |
Large |
Large |
LCA2 |
Rural Inland
Plain Landscape |
Fair |
Fair |
Medium |
Long |
Small |
Small |
Yes |
Yes |
Small |
Small |
LCA3 |
Cemetery
Landscape |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LCA4 |
Major Transportation
Corridor Landscape |
Good |
Good |
Medium |
Long |
Medium |
Medium |
Yes |
Yes |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
LCA5 |
Institutional
Landscape |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LCA6 |
Major
Watercourse Corridor Landscape |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LCA7 |
Rural
Agricultural |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Note: Const. = Construction, Oper. = Operation
Table
11.7 Magnitude of Impact of Landscape Resources
and Landscape Character Areas
ID No. |
Landscape Resources / Landscape Character
Areas |
Compatibility
with the surrounding (Good/Fair/Poor) |
Duration of Impact (Long/Medium/Short) |
Scale of development (Large/Medium/Small) |
Reversibility of change (Yes/No) |
Magnitude of Impact (Large/Intermediate/Small/Negligible) |
|||||
Const. |
Oper. |
Const. |
Oper. |
Const. |
Oper. |
Const. |
Oper. |
Const. |
Oper. |
||
LR1.1 |
Hillside Woodland
Distribute at Valley |
Poor |
Poor |
Medium |
Long |
Medium |
Medium |
No |
No |
Large |
Large |
LR1.2 |
Hillside Woodland along
toe of Upland |
Fair |
Fair |
Medium |
Long |
Medium |
Small |
No |
No |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
LR1.3 |
Exposed Uphill Woodland |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR2.1 |
Uphill Shrubby Grassland |
Fair |
Fair |
Medium |
Long |
Large |
Large |
No |
No |
Large |
Large |
LR2.2 |
Foothill and Middle hill
Shrubby Grassland |
Fair |
Fair |
Medium |
Long |
Medium |
Medium |
No |
No |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
LR2.3 |
Crest Hill Shrubby
Grassland |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR3 |
Lowland Grassland |
Fair |
Fair |
Short |
Long |
Small |
Small |
No |
No |
Small |
Small |
LR4 |
Riverside Vegetation |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR5 |
Abandoned Fish Pond |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR6 |
Rural Development |
Fair |
Fair |
Medium |
Long |
Small |
Small |
Yes |
Yes |
Small |
Small |
LR7 |
Marsh and Wetland |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR8 |
Lowland Woodland |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR9 |
Wetland in Conservation
Area |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR10 |
MacIntosh Fort |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR11 |
Agricultural Land |
Fair |
N/A |
Short |
N/A |
Small |
N/A |
Yes |
N/A |
Small |
Negligible |
LR12 |
Cemetery |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR13 |
Vegetation at Engineered
Slope |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR14 |
Natural Water Stream |
Fair |
Fair |
Medium |
Long |
Small |
Small |
No |
No |
Small |
Small |
LR15 |
Channelized River |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR16 |
Transportation Corridor |
Good |
Good |
Medium |
Long |
Large |
Large |
Yes |
Yes |
Large |
Large |
LR17 |
Vegetation along Utility
Facilities |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR18 |
Pumping Station |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR19 |
Plantation |
Poor |
Poor |
Medium |
Long |
Large |
Large |
No |
No |
Large |
Large |
LR20 |
Active Fish Pond |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LR21 |
Wet Woodland |
Fair |
N/A |
Short |
N/A |
Small |
N/A |
Yes |
N/A |
Small |
Negligible |
LCA1 |
Upland and
Hillside Landscape |
Fair |
Fair |
Medium |
Long |
Large |
Large |
No |
No |
Large |
Large |
LCA2 |
Rural Inland
Plain Landscape |
Fair |
Fair |
Medium |
Long |
Small |
Small |
Yes |
Yes |
Small |
Small |
LCA3 |
Cemetery
Landscape |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LCA4 |
Major
Transportation Corridor Landscape |
Good |
Good |
Medium |
Long |
Medium |
Medium |
Yes |
Yes |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
LCA5 |
Institutional
Landscape |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LCA6 |
Major
Watercourse Corridor Landscape |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LCA7 |
Rural
Agricultural |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Note: Const. = Construction, Oper. = Operation
11.7.3 Magnitude of Landscape Impact
11.7.3.1 Some landscape resources are located within the construction site. There will have large landscape impact on LR1.1, LR2.1, LR16, and LR19 due to the proposed site formation works and the road works. Large portion of landscape area and number of trees will be unavoidably affected within these LRs. They are mainly the landscape resources exist on the top hill of Sandy Ridge (refer to Table 11.7).
11.7.3.2 Landscape resources along the foothill of Sandy Ridge, such as LR1.2 and LR2.2 will have intermediate landscape impact. Most of them are not affected by the construction works, however, there are still some portion of area will be permanently affected and loss by the development.
11.7.3.3 The development works will affect the edge of some landscape resources, or its dust will bring adverse landscape impact to the plant health during construction, such as LR3, LR6, LR11, LR14, and LR21.
11.7.3.4 For landscape character areas, the site formation works will mainly affect the LCA1 Upland and Hillside Landscape due to some portion of its character will be permanently changed. LCA4 Major Transportation Corridor Landscape will have intermediate changes by the road widening of Sha Ling Road and Lin Ma Hang Road. Small portion of LCA2 Rural Inland Plain Landscape will be affect by the roadworks which have small impact.
11.7.3.5 Based on the broad-brush tree survey, approximately 2,700 existing trees are found within the works area. Approximately 1,400 of these existing trees can be retained, and 1,300 nos. of trees will be affected within the works area. Due to construction of the site formation and associates road widening works and footpath, the removal of the affected trees is considered. Affected trees with high to medium amenity value and high to medium survival rate are proposed to be transplanted as far as possible. Trees surveyed within the proposed works boundary are primarily common species. There are no LCSD Registered Old and Valuable Trees. Two mature trees and two rare species trees are found within the works area. For the two mature trees, one of them are unavoidably affected by the roadworks, and the other one will be retained. The two rare species trees will be relocated as far as technically feasible.
11.7.3.6 There are two number of Aquilaria sinensis (¤g¨I»), which listed under the Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586) are proposed to be relocated as far as technically feasible. One number of mature Bombax ceiba (¤ì´Ö) found within the works area and will unavoidably be affected by the proposed new road and viaduct section. Since the alignment of proposed road and viaduct has considered the constraints of land resumption, engineering technical feasibility, existing topography, etc. the site formation layout and road alignment has been optimised.
11.7.4 Visual Impacts Before Mitigation
11.7.4.1 The changes to each VSR group¡¦s views during construction and operation are briefly described below and summarised in Table 11.8. Note that most of the Project will be shielded from VSRs in HKSAR by the natural topography of Sandy Ridge itself and hence the major earthworks involved for the site formation hardly affect these VSRs. The photomontages from VP4 (Figure 11.7.4) shows the indication of the worst case scenario for the future columbarium and crematorium building development works by others.
VSR R1
11.7.4.2 For the residents in this VSR group who will be able to see the Project, the main change will be due to the construction of the access road network, with the site formation and clearance required for this. The photomontages from VP1, VP2 and VP7 (Figures 11.7.1, 11.7.2a, 11.7.2b and 11.7.7) illustrate that the new access road will only cause a small change in view and overall magnitude of change is considered small during construction and operational phases.
VSR R2
11.7.4.3 The photomontage from VP3, indicates residents of San Uk Ling will hardly be affected by the Project, shielded from seeing it by a small green hill across Man Kam To Road (Figure 11.7.3). The main change in their view will be to see the small portion on tops of the upland will be formed as platform, and the road widening works of Lin Ma Hang Road. During construction and operational phases, the magnitude of change is small.
VSR R3
11.7.4.4 Views towards the proposed works from Residents of Lo Wu Village will be fully blocked by the existing landform of Sandy Ridge, the magnitude of change is considered as negligible during construction and operational phases.
VSR R4
11.7.4.5 Residents of Muk Wu will hardly be able to see any of the Project. The only change in their view will be the road widening works of Lin Ma Hang Road. During construction and operational phases, the magnitude of change is negligible.
VSR R5
11.7.4.6 The photomontage from VP5 (Figure 11.7.5), indicates residents of along the foothill of Tai Shek Mo will hardly be affected by the Project, shielded from seeing it by a small green hill across Man Kam To Road. During construction and operational phases, the magnitude of change is considered as negligible.
VSR R6
11.7.4.7 Residents of Muk Wu Nga Yiu will have partial view towards the proposed Lin Ma Hang Road. During construction and operational phases, the magnitude of change is considered as intermediate.
VSR GIC1
11.7.4.8 Workers of Border District Police Headquarter will hardly be able to see any of the Projects. Their view will be fully blocked by the existing vegetation. During construction and operational phases, the magnitude of change is negligible.
VSR GIC2
11.7.4.9 Workers of Water Treatment Works facilities will hardly be able to see any of the Projects. Their view will be fully blocked by the existing storage and rural setting. During construction and operational phases, the magnitude of change is negligible.
VSR GIC3
11.7.4.10 Workers of Man Kam To Pumping Station will hardly be able to see any of the Projects. Their view will be fully blocked by the existing vegetation and landform. During construction and operational phases, the magnitude of change is negligible.
VSR GIC4
11.7.4.11 Workers of Lo Wu Correctional Institution will hardly be able to see any of the Projects. Their view will be fully blocked by the existing vegetation and landform. During construction and operational phases, the magnitude of change is negligible.
VSR T1
11.7.4.12 Travellers on the East Rail Line may be able see the site clearance and formation works associated with the construction of the access road network, but most views will be shielded by natural topography and vegetation. It is considered the magnitude of change is negligible during construction and operational phase.
VSR T2
11.7.4.13 Travellers along Man Kam To Road will be affected by the construction of the new access road system and the associated site clearance and formation works. During operation phase, they will have good views of the new road connections but view of the site formation for the platform will be minimal as indicated in the photomontages from VP1 and VP2 (Figures 11.7.1 and 11.7.2a & b). Overall magnitude of change is small during construction and operational phases.
VSR I1
11.7.4.14 Workers at storage area along Man Kam To Road may be able see the site clearance and formation works associated with the construction of the access road network, however most views will be shielded by natural topography and vegetation. Therefore, it is considered the magnitude of change is negligible during construction and operational phase.
Table
11.8 Magnitude of impacts on Visual Sensitive
Receivers during construction and operational phases
VSR ID. |
VSR |
Approx. Distance, m |
Compatibility
(Good/ Fair/ Poor) |
Potential Blockage
of View (Full/Partial/Nil) |
Duration of
Impact (Temporary/ Permanent) |
Scale of the
Project when viewed from the VSR (Small/Medium/ Large) |
Reversibility
of Impact (Yes/Partial/No) |
Magnitude of
Change (Large/Intermediate/Small/Negligible) |
|||||
Const. |
Oper. |
Const. |
Oper. |
Const. |
Oper. |
Const. |
Oper. |
Const. |
Oper. |
||||
R1 |
Residents of
villages along Man Kam To Road |
5-10m |
Fair |
Partial |
Partial |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Medium |
Medium |
Partial |
No |
Small |
Small |
R2 |
Residents of
San Uk ling |
440m |
Fair |
Nil |
Nil |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Small |
Small |
Partial |
No |
Small |
Small |
R3 |
Residents of
Lo Wu Village |
430m |
Fair |
Nil |
Nil |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Small |
Small |
Partial |
No |
Negligible |
Negligible |
R4 |
Residents of
Muk Wu |
890m |
Fair |
Nil |
Nil |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Small |
Small |
Partial |
No |
Negligible |
Negligible |
R5 |
Residents of
villages along Foothill of Tai Shek Mo |
1100m |
Fair |
Nil |
Nil |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Small |
Small |
Partial |
No |
Negligible |
Negligible |
R6 |
Residents of
Muk Wu Nga Yiu |
1300m |
Fair |
Partial |
Partial |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Small |
Small |
Partial |
No |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
GIC1 |
Works in
Border District Police Headquarters |
270m |
Fair |
Nil |
Nil |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Small |
Small |
Partial |
No |
Negligible |
Negligible |
GIC2 |
Workers at
Water Treatment Works |
960m |
Fair |
Nil |
Nil |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Small |
Small |
Partial |
No |
Negligible |
Negligible |
GIC3 |
Workers at Man
Kam To Pumping Station |
670m |
Fair |
Nil |
Nil |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Small |
Small |
Partial |
No |
Negligible |
Negligible |
GIC4 |
Workers at Lo
Wu Correctional Institution |
1600m |
Fair |
Nil |
Nil |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Small |
Small |
Partial |
No |
Negligible |
Negligible |
T1 |
Travellers
along East Rail Line |
650m |
Fair |
Nil |
Nil |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Small |
Small |
Partial |
No |
Negligible |
Negligible |
T2 |
Travellers
along Man Kam To Road |
5-10m |
Fair |
Nil |
Nil |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Small |
Small |
Partial |
No |
Small |
Small |
I1 |
Workers at
Storage Area along Man Kam To Road |
700m |
Fair |
Nil |
Nil |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Small |
Small |
Partial |
No |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Note: R = Residential; GIC = Government/Institution/Community, I =
Industrials, T = Transport related
Const. = Construction, Oper. = Operation
11.8
Proposed
Mitigation Measures
11.8.1.1 The selection of site has carefully considered key constraints and tried to minimise impacts. The design of the works will also attempt to integrate the Project into the surroundings as far as possible given all constraints.
11.8.1.2 Mitigation measures follow the principles of first avoiding impacts by all means feasible, then reducing any unavoidable impacts to as low as practically possible and finally mitigating any remaining impacts.
11.8.1.3 The proposed landscape and visual mitigation measures for the works are listed in Table 11.9. Generally, all mitigation measures are to be implemented as early as possible and many of these mitigation measures perform multiple functions.
Table 11.9
Proposed mitigation measures for landscape and visual impacts
Mitigation
No. |
Mitigation
Measure |
Funding
Agency |
Implementation
Agency |
Management/
Maintenance Agency |
CM1 |
The
construction area and contractor¡¦s temporary works areas would be minimised
to avoid impacts on adjacent landscape, and the reliance on off-site
construction. |
CEDD |
CEDD |
Nil |
CM3* |
Screening of
construction works by hoardings/noise barriers around works area in visually
unobtrusive colours and to screen construction works. It is proposed that screening
be compatible with the surrounding environment and where possible,
non-reflective, recessive colours be used. Hoarding should be taken down at the
end of the construction period. |
CEDD |
CEDD / Contractor |
Nil |
CM4 |
Dust and Erosion Control
for Exposed Soil - Excavation works and demolition of existing building
blocks shall be well planned with precautions to suppress dust. Exposed soil
shall be covered or watered often. Areas that are expected to be left with
bare soil for a long period of time after excavation shall be properly
covered with suitable protective fabric. Suitable drainage shall be provided
around construction sites to avoid discharge of contaminants and sediments
into sensitive water-based habitat. |
Contractor |
Contractor |
Nil |
CM5* |
Control
night-time lighting and glare by hooding all lights. |
CEDD |
Contractor |
Nil |
CM6(a) |
Tree
Protection and Preservation ¡V Woodland, plantation and other vegetation
within the Study Area will be protected and preserved as far as possible in accordance
with ETWB TCW No. 29/2004 and DEVB TC(W) No. 07/2015. Detailed Design
Considerations have considered avoiding impacts to trees, e.g. proper
viaduct/ bridge design routing to avoid majority of the woodland, locating
the columbarium buildings in areas with less trees and ensuring design of the
buildings has as small a footprint as practical. |
CEDD |
CEDD / Consultant /
Contractor |
Contractor(c)/
FEHD(d)/ HyD(d)/ LCSD(d) |
CM7(a) |
Tree
Transplantation ¡V Tree(s) will affected(b) according to the Tree
Preservation and Removal Proposal to be carried out in a later stage.
Established trees of value are to be re-located where practically feasible. |
CEDD |
CEDD / Contractor |
Contractor(c)/
FEHD(d)/ HyD(d)/ LCSD(d) |
CM8 |
Implementing precautionary
control measures during construction stage accordingly to ETWB TCW No. 5/2005
¡V Protection of natural streams/rivers from adverse impacts arising from
construction works to avoid direct or indirect impacts any watercourses and
good site practices. |
CEDD |
CEDD / Contractor |
Contractor(c)/
FEHD(d)/ HyD(d)/ LCSD(d) |
OM1[f] |
Compensatory
Woodland Planting - The arrangement of compensatory planting (e.g. areas of
woodland to be compensated and space to be allowed within the Project Site)
will be subjected to detailed engineering design, landscape design and
planting plan, and is recommended to be implemented prior to the construction
activities as far as practical. |
CEDD |
CEDD / Contractor |
Contractor(c)
/ FEHD(d)/ HyD(d)/ LCSD(d) |
OM2 |
Compensatory Tree Planting for Plantation and
Other Vegetated Areas - Compensatory planting should be provided in
accordance with DEVB TC(W) No. 07/2015 to compensate for those trees felled.
According to the preliminary design, compensatory trees will be planted on
the cut/fill slopes, along new roads and in car parks. The selection of
planting species shall be made with reference to the species identified in
the future Detailed Tree Survey and be native to Hong Kong or the South China
region. |
CEDD |
CEDD / Contractor |
Contractor(c)
/ FEHD(d)/ HyD(d)/ LCSD(d) |
OM3 |
Amenity Planting and aesthetic streetscape design
of hard landscaping for Pedestrian Walkway, Roadside - Roadside amenity
planting should be provided along Sha Ling Road, Lin Ma Hang Road, as well as
the internal road within Sandy Ridge columbarium and crematorium site; to
enhance the landscape quality of the existing and proposed transport routes.
Climbers are proposed to cover vertical, hard surfaces of the piers of the
proposed viaducts, and also the newly formed retaining wall within the site.
Shade tolerant plants will be planted, where light is sufficient, to improve
aesthetic value of areas under viaducts. |
CEDD |
CEDD / Contractor |
Contractor(c)/
HyD(d)/ LCSD(d) |
OM4 |
Greening Works and Contour Grading Works on Cut/
Fill Slopes - Greening works such as hydroseeding/ terraces of shrub or tree
planting will be provided where slope gradient allows, according to
Geotechnical Engineering Office (GEO) Publication No.1/2011 Technical
Guidelines on Landscape Treatment for Slopes. |
CEDD |
CEDD / Contractor |
Contractors(c)/
HyD(d)/ LCSD(d)/ FEHD(d) |
OM5[e] |
Landscape design
treatment to be provided by relevant government department. |
FEHD |
FEHD / Contractor |
Contractor(c)
/ FEHD(d)/ HyD(d)/ LCSD(d) |
OM6* |
Architectural and
chromatic treatment of the hard architectural and engineering structures and
facilities. |
FEHD |
FEHD / Contractor |
Contractor(c)
/ FEHD(d)/ HyD(d)/ LCSD(d) |
OM7* |
Aesthetic design of the
proposed noise barriers. |
CEDD |
CEDD / Contractor |
Contractor(c)/
HyD(d) |
OM8 |
Silt traps should be
incorporated into design of road gullies for the natural water stream(s). |
CEDD |
CEDD / Contractor |
Contractor(c)/
HyD(d) |
Notes:
(a)
A detailed Tree Survey Report showing all identified valuable trees and
OVT will be undertaken in a separate Tree Preservation and Removal Proposal.
(b)
Wood resulting from tree removal should be recycled as mulch or
soil conditioner for re-use within the Project or in other projects as far as
possible e.g. for the construction of soft landscape work, were
practical.
(c)
Contractor is responsible for landscaping during the agreed
establishment and maintenance period. Other designated management and
maintenance agents to take up maintenance and management of landscaping after
end of agreed period.
(d)
Highways
Department (HyD) is responsible for maintenance and management
of landscaping of public road side slope, Leisure and Cultural Services Department (LCSD) is
responsible for the management and maintenance of soft landscapes along
non-expressway public roads outside Country Park and Food and Environmental Hygiene
Department (FEHD)
is responsible for maintenance and management of landscaping of other areas allocated to FEHD.
(e) The landscape mitigation treatment of the future
development site shall follow the below frameworks:
- Buffer planting shall be provided to soften the
edge of the site.
- Aesthetic landscape treatment including both soft
and hard landscape features shall be provided.
- Vertical greening shall be provided as far as
practicable.
- At-grade tree planting shall be provided as far as
possible while planting space is allowed, to enhance the overall environment.
- Architectural design shall blend in with the
surrounding environment.
- Overall greening ratio shall comply with TC(W)
No.3/2012 Site coverage of Greenery for Government Building Projects.
(f)
The
compensatory woodland planting shall be included woodland mixed whips, seeding,
and shrubs. The principle of the location shall be the extension of the
existing woodland, as well as the original lost woodland location. The proposal
will be agreed with AFCD, the woodland enhancement planting shall refer to Chapter 9.
* These mitigation measures are principally
used to reduce the significance of visual impacts although some, such as the
green roof and vertical greening, will contribute to the overall landscaping of
the Project.
11.8.1.4 The master landscape plans show the preliminary soft landscape treatment is shown in Figures 11.6.1a and 11.6.2. For the assessment of visual impacts that would be caused by future developments under other project scopes, Figure 11.6.1a represents the worst case scenario of the future columbarium and crematorium building development by others. The Photomontages of the proposed project without and with mitigation measures at Day 1 and Year 10, illustrating the appearance of the proposed works, and the locations of viewpoints are shown in Figure 11.4.1.
11.8.1.5 The proposed landscape treatment of the slope and retaining wall are shown in Figure 11.6.3, where the landscape mitigation measures of the viaducts and retaining wall are shown in Figures 11.6.4 and 11.6.6 respectively. In addition, the indicative section of future columbarium buildings is shown in Figure 11.6.5.
11.8.1.6 The compensatory woodland planting shall be in woodland mixed shrubs, seeding, and whips. The principle of the location shall be the extension of the existing woodland, as well as the original lost woodland location. Woodland mixed species such as Machilus pauhoi, Cratoxylum cochinchinense, Litsea rotundifolia var. oblongifolia, Cinnamomum camphora, Daphniphyllum calycinum, Bridelia tomentosa, Phyllanthus emblica shall be proposed.
11.8.1.7 Species proposed for woodland planting shall be pioneer native tree and shrub species often present in natural woodlands in Hong Kong.
11.8.1.8 Woodland planting shall be scheduled to be undertaken in two Phases. For Phase 1, more tolerant of exposed areas and the consequent effect of sunlight, wind and drying out of soils shall be planted. For Phase 2, the remaining that are likely to establish more successfully once woody cover is present and available to provide shade and shelter and to buffer changes in soil moisture level shall be planted. Thus, Phase 1 planting will improve the existing microclimate condition at the beginning for Phase 2 planting.
11.8.1.9 20m fire protection zone will be proposed along the edge of compensatory woodland which is adjacent to human activities and existing villages. Acacia confusa (¥xÆW¬Û«ä) will be planted in this buffer zone as a shelterbelt and therefore serve as a firebreak and will also be beneficial as a nitrogen fixer.
11.8.1.10 It is considered that the mitigation measures below shall be applied on the proposed barging point at Siu Lam to avoid and reduce the landscape and visual impact:
 Tree Protection and Preservation ¡V Woodland, plantation and other vegetation within the Study Area will be protected and preserved as far as possible in accordance with ETWB TCW No. 29/2004 and DEVB TC(W) No.07/2015. Detailed Design Considerations have considered avoiding impacts to trees, e.g. proper viaduct/ bridge design routing to avoid majority of the woodland, locating the columbarium buildings in areas with less trees and ensuring design of the buildings has as small a footprint as practical; and
 Reinstatement of disturbed areas to match adjacent area or to condition to suit future landuse.
11.8.2 Prediction of Significant of Landscape Impact
11.8.2.1 The potential significance of the landscape impacts during the construction and operational phases, before and after mitigation, is provided in Table 11.10. This assessment follows the proposed methodology and assumes that the appropriate design measures incorporated in the development layout and the mitigation measures identified in Table 11.9 would be implemented and that the full effect of the soft landscape mitigation measures would be realized after 10 years. Cumulative impact during construction and operational phases of the Sandy Ridge site formation works and associated infrastructural works, and all concurrent projects within the assessment area on landscape resources and landscape character areas are described below.
Table 11.10 Significance
threshold of residual impact before and after mitigation: Operation Day 1 and
Year 10 (Note: All impacts are Adverse unless otherwise noted as Beneficial)
No. |
Landscape
Resources/Landscape Character Areas |
Sensitivity (Low, Medium, High) |
Magnitude of
Change (Negligible/Small/ Intermediate/Large) |
Impact Significance
Threshold BEFORE Mitigation (Insubstantial/Slight/Moderate/Substantial) |
Recommended
Mitigation Measures |
Residual
Impact Significance Threshold After Mitigation
(Insubstantial/Slight/Moderate/ Substantial) |
||||
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
|||||
Day 1 |
Year 10 |
|||||||||
Landscape Resources |
||||||||||
LR1 |
Hillside Woodland |
|||||||||
LR1.1 |
Hillside Woodland
Distribute at Valley |
High |
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Substantial |
CM1, CM6, CM7, OM1, OM2, OM3, OM4, OM5, OM6 |
Substantial |
Moderate |
Slight |
LR1.2 |
Hillside Woodland
Distribute along the toe of Upland |
High |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
CM1, CM6, CM7, OM1, OM2, OM3, OM4 |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
LR1.3 |
Exposed Uphill Woodland |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LR2 |
Hillside Shrubby Grassland |
|||||||||
LR2.1 |
Uphill Shrubby Grassland |
Medium |
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Substantial |
CM1, OM1, OM3, OM4, OM5, OM6 |
Substantial |
Moderate |
Slight |
LR2.2 |
Foothill and Middle hill
Shrubby Grassland |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
CM1, OM1, OM3, OM4, OM5 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
LR2.3 |
Crest Hill Shrubby
Grassland |
Medium |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LR3 |
Lowland Grassland |
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
CM1, OM1, OM3, OM4, OM5 |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LR4 |
Riverside Vegetation |
Medium |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LR5 |
Abandoned Fish Pond |
Medium |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LR6 |
Rural Development |
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
CM1, CM6, CM7, OM3 |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LR7 |
Marsh and Wetland |
Medium |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LR8 |
Lowland Woodland |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LR9 |
Wetland in Conservation Area |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LR10 |
MacIntosh Fort |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LR11 |
Agricultural Land |
Medium |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
CM1, CM4 |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LR12 |
Cemetery |
Medium |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LR13 |
Vegetation at Engineered
Slope |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LR14 |
Natural Water Stream |
High |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
CM1, CM4, CM8, OM8 |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LR15 |
Channelized River |
Medium |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LR16 |
Transportation Corridor |
Low |
Large |
Large |
Moderate |
Moderate |
CM6, CM7, OM2, OM3 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
LR17 |
Vegetation along Utility Facilities |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LR18 |
Pumping Station |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LR19 |
Plantation |
Medium |
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Substantial |
CM6, CM7, OM2, OM3 |
Substantial |
Moderate |
Slight |
LR20 |
Active Fish Pond |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LR21 |
Wet Woodland |
High |
Small |
Negligible |
Moderate |
Insubstantial |
CM1, CM4, CM8, OM8 |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Landscape Character Areas |
||||||||||
LCA1 |
Upland and Hillside
Landscape within Sandy Ridge Development Site |
High |
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Substantial |
CM1, CM6, CM7, OM1, OM2, OM3, OM4, OM5 |
Substantial |
Moderate |
Slight |
LCA2 |
Rural Inland Plain Landscape |
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
CM1, OM1, OM3, OM4, OM5 |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LCA3 |
Cemetery Landscape |
Medium |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LCA4 |
Major Transportation Corridor Landscape |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
CM6, CM7, OM2, OM3 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
LCA5 |
Institutional Landscape |
Medium |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LCA6 |
Major Watercourse Corridor Landscape |
Medium |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LCA7 |
Rural Agricultural |
Medium |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
11.8.3 Prediction of Significant of Visual Impact
11.8.3.1 The potential significance of the visual impacts during the construction and operational phases, before and after mitigation, is provided in Table 11.11. This assessment follows the proposed methodology and assumes that the appropriate design measures incorporated in the development layout and the mitigation measures identified in Table 11.9 would be implemented and that the full effect of the mitigation measures would be realized after 10 years. Cumulative impact during construction and operational phases of Sandy Ridge site formation works and associated infrastructural works, and all concurrent projects within the assessment area visually sensitive receivers are described below.
Table 11.11
Significance of visual impacts during construction and operational phases
(Note: All impacts are Adverse unless otherwise noted with Beneficial)
No. |
Visual
Sensitive Receiver |
Sensitivity (Low, Medium, High) |
Magnitude of
Change (Negligible/Small/ Intermediate/Large) |
Impact
Significance Threshold Before Mitigation
(Insubstantial/Slight/Moderate/Substantial) |
Recommended
Mitigation Measures |
Residual
Impact Significance Threshold After Mitigation (Insubstantial/Slight/Moderate/ Substantial) |
||||
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
|||||
Day 1 |
Year 10 |
|||||||||
R1 |
Residents of
villages along Man Kam To Road |
High |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
CM1, CM3, CM5, OM3, OM4. OM5, OM6, OM7 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
R2 |
Residents of
San Uk ling |
High |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
CM1, CM3, CM5, OM3, OM4, OM5 OM6, OM7 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
R3 |
Residents of
Lo Wu Village |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
R4 |
Residents of
Muk Wu |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
R5 |
Residents of
villages along Foothill of Tai Shek Mo |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
R6 |
Residents of
Muk Wu Nga Yiu |
High |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
CM3, CM5, OM3, OM5 OM6, OM7 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
GIC1 |
Works in Border
District Police Headquarters |
Medium |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
GIC2 |
Workers at
Water Treatment Works |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
GIC3 |
Workers at Man
Kam To Pumping Station |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
GIC4 |
Workers at Lo
Wu Correctional Institution |
Medium |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
T1 |
Travellers
along East Rail Line |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
T2 |
Travellers
along Man Kam To Road |
Low |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
CM3, CM5, OM3, OM5 OM6, OM7 |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
I1 |
Workers at
Storage Area along Man Kam To Road |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
*Note:
R = Residential; GIC = Government/Institution/Community, I = Industrials, T =
Transport related
11.9.1 Residual Landscape Impact During Construction Phase
11.9.1.1 Based on the tree survey report, approximately 1,300 nos. of trees will be affected within the works area, of which approximately 1,100 nos. will be affected within Sandy Ridge Project boundary, and approximately 200 nos. trees will be affected along Lin Ma Hang Road widening. They are mostly tree group at the foothill and roadside trees planting.
11.9.1.2 Trees surveyed within the proposed works area are primarily common species. There are no LCSD Registered Old and Valuable Trees. Two mature trees with larger than 1m DBH found within the works area, they are 2 nos. of Bombax ceiba (¤ì´Ö) located in LR1.1 and LR6 respectively. In addition, 1 no. of mature Ficus elastic (¦L«×º_) located in LR6 which found outside the works area. All the found mature trees are common species in Hong Kong and in fair to poor amenity value. For the two mature trees within the works area, which 1 no. of Bombax ceiba (¤ì´Ö) will be affected by the proposed Sha Ling Road widening and required to be felled unavoidably. There are two number of Aquilaria sinensis (¤g¨I») located in LR1.1 and LR1.2 respectively, which is listed under the Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586), found within the works area and unavoidably to be affected by the proposed new road and viaduct section, which are proposed to be relocated as far as technically feasible. The proposed works design has been optimised and minimised on affecting existing trees as far as feasible, any affected trees will be studied on its technical feasibility on the transplanting.
11.9.1.3 The alignment of Sha Ling Road has already be optimized. The columbarium site is composed of platforms at +50mPD and two EVAs which have been carefully designed based on the constraints of natural topography, locations of graves and woodland. There is a constraint that the PDA at +50mPD would require an access directly from Sha Ling Road at the same level. Therefore, at this area, Sha Ling Road would need to attain a level of +50mPD.
11.9.1.4 On the other hand, since there are private lots in the existing Sha Ling Village near Man Kam To Road, the existing run-in has to be maintained as access to these lots and thus the road profile of this section of Sha Ling Road from +12.3mPD to +20mPD has to be kept unchanged. After attaining the level of +20mPD, Sha Ling Road has to be risen to a level of +50mPD for an elevation difference of 30m within a horizontal distance of about 430m in order to access the platform of PDA. This means this section of Sha Ling Road could only be constructed to a gradient of about 7.5%. Based upon the above constraints and with the consideration of minimizing the Cut and Fill volume, the alignment of Sha Ling Road has been optimized.
11.9.1.5 In accordance with DEVB TCW No. 07/2015, the proposed compensatory planting proposal should be of a ratio not less than 1:1 in terms of quantity within the site and off-site as far as possible. For the proposed trees to be felled, heavy standard trees with trunk diameter from 75mm to 150mm (as specified in the Clause 3.15 of General Specification of Civil Engineering Works 2006) will be adopted for compensatory planting along Lin Ma Hang Road section, and some portion of the roadside planting within Sandy Ridge, light standard trees and whips planting will be proposed on the slope with gradient less than 35 degree.
11.9.1.6 A limited planting space is available for tree compensation, it is considered that creating addition planting area for compensatory tree planting will cause larger site formation area, and thus it will affect more existing trees and natural vegetation.
11.9.1.7 Compensatory woodland planting will be proposed along the hillsides to compensate the loss of existing woodland and enhance greenery. Woodland mix species whips shall be planted at the selected grassland, planting will be undertaken at 1.5m centres in staggered rows. Approximately 16,000 nos. of whips will be planted along the hillsides to create the woodland.
11.9.1.8 Cumulative impact on existing trees is summarized in Table 11.7, and tree survey plan is shown in Appendix 11.1.
11.9.1.9 Detailed tree preservation, transplanting and felling including compensatory planting proposals shall be submitted to relevant government departments for approval in accordance with DEVB TCW No. 07/2015.
11.9.1.10 There will be substantial impact on LR1.1 Hillside Woodland Distribute at Valley, LR2.1 Uphill Shrubby Grassland and LR19 Plantation in construction phase due to the amount of affected trees along the upgrading of Sha Ling Road, and also because a portion of hillside woodland at the eastern side of the site will be affected by the proposed road and viaduct. Mitigation measures such as minimization of the construction area will be applied in construction phase. Further mitigation measures such as grass planting and landscape design treatment on the future development, as well as woodland compensation will be provided in operational phase to reduce such landscape impact.
11.9.1.11 There will be moderate impact on LR1.2 Hillside Woodland along toe of Upland, LR2.2 Foothill and Middle hill Shrubby Grassland and LR16 Transportatin Corridor in construction phase due to the amount of affected trees along the upgrading of Sha Ling Road, and also because a portion of hillside woodland at the western side of the site will be affected by the proposed road and viaduct. Mitigation measures such as tree protection and minimize the construction area will be applied in construction phase. The landscape impact will be further reduced during operation phase when the proposed trees grown in mature size.
11.9.1.12 There will be moderate indirect impact on LR21 Wet Woodland in
construction phase due to their close location are close to the proposed
construction works. Dust might cause adverse impact during construction phase,
however, such impact will be reduced to slight after mitigation measures are
applied.
11.9.1.13 There will be slight impact on LR3 Lowland Grassland, LR6 Rural Development and LR14 Natural Water Stream in construction phase due to small portion of these LRs will be affected by the construction works of the site formation works and road widening of Lin Ma Hang Road and Sha Ling Road. The area adjacent to these two roads will be setback due to the works.
11.9.1.14 There will be slight indirect impact on LR11 Agricultural Land in construction phase due to their close location to the proposed construction works. Dust during dry weather, which will affect the planting health located adjacent to the construction site during construction period, might cause adverse impact during construction phase, however, such impact will be reduced to insubstantial after mitigation measures, are applied.
11.9.1.15 There will be substantial impact on LCA1 Upland and Hillside Landscape in construction phase due to the significant changes on the existing topography by the proposed site formation works for the platform. The natural terrain will be formed into four major plain platform and associates cut and filled slopes. Mitigation measures such as tree protection and minimize the construction area will be applied in the construction phase. Further mitigation measures such as grass planting will be provided in operation phase to reduce such landscape impact..
11.9.1.16 There will be slight impact on LCA2 Rural Inland Plain Landscape in construction phase as due to the proposed two entrances along Man Kam To Road towards Sandy Ridge site will slightly change the rural setting. The area adjacent to these two roads will be setback due to the works.
11.9.1.17 There will have moderate impact on LCA4 Major Transportation Corridor Landscape in construction phase due to the upgrading and road widening works along existing Sha Ling Road and Lin Ma Hang Road (from Man Kam To Road to Ping Yuen River).
11.9.1.18 The residual impact on other LRs and LCAs will be insubstantial during construction phase.
11.9.2 Residual Landscape Impact in Operation Phase
11.9.2.1 Residual impact on landscape resources and landscape character areas are shown in Table 11.10.
11.9.2.2 LR1.1 ¡V There is substantial impact on Natural Hillside Woodland within Sandy Ridge due to the loss of some existing trees along the proposed roadwork and for the site formation. Mitigation measures shall be applied. Compensatory trees and landscape amenity treatment on the future development will mitigate the lost of greenery and blend in the proposed development with the natural surroundings. Woodland mixed whips planting shall be proposed to create a natural woodland in the long term operation phase. Appropriate greenery measures will be applied on the proposed cut and filled slope. It is considered that the residual impact can be reduced to moderate after all mitigation measures are applied, and it will further reduce to slight after the compensatory woodland is applied and matured at Year 10.
11.9.2.3 LR1.2 ¡V There is moderate impact on Hillside Woodland along toe of Upland due to the loss of small portion of woodland at the foothill by the proposed roadworks. It is considered that the residual impact is expected to be reduced to moderate after mitigation measures of hydroseeding applied and roadside planting at Day 1 operation and slight after the planting become mature in Year 10 operation.
11.9.2.4 LR1.3 ¡V There will be insubstantial impact on Exposed Uphill Woodland as this LR is relatively far away from the works and will not be affected in operational phase.
11.9.2.5 LR2.1¡VThere is substantial impact on Hillside Shrubby Grassland due to the loss of large portion of grassland for the site formation works. It is considered that the residual impact is expected to be reduced to moderate after mitigation measures of hydroseeding applied at Day 1 operation and slight after all of the landscaping design treatment on the future development applied in Year 10 operation.
11.9.2.6 LR2.2 ¡V There is moderate impact on Foothill and Middle hill Shrubby Grassland due to the loss of some portion of grassland by the proposed road works and slope works. It is considered that the residual impact is expected to be reduced to slight after mitigation measures of slope greening treatment applied at Day 1 and in Year 10 operation.
11.9.2.7 LR2.3 ¡V It will be subject to insubstantial impact on Crest Hill Shrubby Grassland due to this LR is relatively far away from the works and will not be affected in operational phase.
11.9.2.8 LR3 ¡V There is some minor impact on Lowland Grassland during the construction of Lin Ma Hang Road widening. It is considered that the residual impact is expected to be reduced as insubstantial after mitigation measures applied along the roadsides of Lin Ma Hang Road in Year 10 operation.
11.9.2.9 LR4 ¡V Riverside Vegetation will be subject to insubstantial impact as this LR is relatively far away from the works and will not be affected in operation phase.
11.9.2.10 LR5 ¡V Active Fish Pond will be subject to insubstantial impact as this LR is relatively far away from the works and will not be affected in Year 10 operation.
11.9.2.11 LR6 ¡V There is some minor impact on Rural Development during the construction of Lin Ma Hang Road widening and the proposed entrance at Sha Ling Road. It is considered that the residual impact is expected to be reduced as insubstantial after mitigation measures applied in Year 10 operation.
11.9.2.12 LR7 ¡V Marsh and Wetland will be subject to insubstantial impact as this LR is relatively far away from the works and will not be affected in Year 10 operation.
11.9.2.13 LR8 ¡V Lowland Woodland will be subject to insubstantial impact as this LR is relatively far away from the works and will not be affected in Year 10 operation.
11.9.2.14 LR9 ¡V Wetland in Conservation Area will be subject to insubstantial impact as this LR is relatively far away from the works and will not be affected in Year 10 operation.
11.9.2.15 LR10 ¡V MacIntosh Fort will be subject to insubstantial impact as this LR is relatively far away from the works and will not be affected in Year 10 operation.
11.9.2.16 LR11 ¡V Agricultural Land will be subject to minor indirect impact by the dust during the works. It is considered that the residual impact is expected to be reduced as insubstantial after mitigation measures applied in Year 10 operation.
11.9.2.17 LR12 ¡V Cemetery will be subject to insubstantial impact as this LR is relatively far away from the works and will not be affected.
11.9.2.18 LR13 ¡V Vegetation at Engineered Slope will be subject to insubstantial impact as this LR is relatively far away from the works and will not be affected in Year 10 operation.
11.9.2.19 LR14 ¡V Some portion of Natural Water Stream will be lost due to the construction of viaduct and some portion of site formation, and the construction works might cause adverse impact to the water quality of the stream. Precautionary measures such as placing of sandbags or slit curtains shall be applied during construction phase. The impact under construction phase shall be slight. It is considered that the residual impact is expected to be reduced as insubstantial after mitigation measures applied in Year 10 operation.
11.9.2.20 LR15 ¡V Channelised River will be subject to insubstantial impact as this LR is relatively far away from the works and will not be affected.
11.9.2.21 LR16 ¡V There is moderate impact on Transportation Corridor during the works of Sha Ling Road upgrading and Lin Ma Hang road widening. It is considered that the residual impact is expected to be reduced as slight at Day 1 operation, and further reduce to at Year 10 operation after mitigation measures applied along the roadsides of Lin Ma Hang Road.
11.9.2.22 LR17 ¡V Vegetation along Utility Facilities will be subject to insubstantial impact as this LR is relatively far away from the works and will not be affected in Year 10 operation.
11.9.2.23 LR18 ¡V Pumping Station will be subject to insubstantial impact as this LR is relatively far away from the works and will not be affected in Year 10 operation.
11.9.2.24 LR19 ¡V There is substantial impact on Plantation due to the loss of large number of existing trees along the proposed roadwork and viaduct. It is considered that the residual impact is expected to be reduced to moderate after all of the mitigation measures applied at Day 1 operation. The impact is expected to reduce to slight after the compensatory woodland mitigation measures grow and matured in Year 10 operation.
11.9.2.25 LR20 ¡V Abandon Fish Pond will be subject to insubstantial impact as this LR is relatively far away from the works and will not be affected in Year 10 operation.
11.9.2.26 LR21 ¡V Wet Woodland will be subject to indirect impact by the dust during the works during construction phase. Nevertheless, it is considered that the residual impact is expected to be reduced as insubstantial after mitigation measures applied in Year 10 operation because there will have no direct works on the wet woodland to cause any loss of greening.
11.9.2.27 LCA1 - There will be substantial impact on Upland and Hillside Landscape within Sandy Ridge due to the changes of landform for the site formation of the platform. After the proposed mitigation measures of the hydroseeding and the slope greening in Day 1 operation, it is considered that the residual impact on this LCA can be slightly reduced to moderate. In addition, mitigation measures of the landscape design treatment and the aesthetic building design shall be adopted to blend in the development with the surrounding, and hence the residual impact can be reduced to slight after landscape design treatment is applied and the woodland mixed whips planting become mature in Year 10 operation.
11.9.2.28 LCA2 - There will be slight impact on Rural Inland Plain Landscape due to the permanent changes on the existing local road and setback of some rural area. However, with the proposed mitigation measures, it is considered that the residual impact on this LCA is insubstantial.
11.9.2.29 LCA3 ¡V Cemetery Landscape will be subject to insubstantial impact as this LCA is relatively far away from the proposed site formation and road widening works.
11.9.2.30 LCA4 ¡V There will be moderate impact on Major Transportation Corridor Landscape due to the road upgrading and widening of Lin Ma Hang road. However, with the proposed mitigation measures, it is considered that the residual impact on this LCA is insubstantial.
11.9.2.31 LCA5 ¡V Institutional Landscape will be subject to insubstantial impact as this LCA is relatively far away from the proposed site formation and road widening works.
11.9.2.32 LCA6 ¡V Major Watercourse Corridor Landscape will be subject to insubstantial impact as this LCA is relatively far away from the proposed site formation and road widening works.
11.9.2.33 LCA7 ¡V Rural Agricultural Landscape will be subject to insubstantial impact as this LCA is relatively far away from the proposed site formation and road widening works.
11.9.2.34 The overall residual impact on all LR and LCA are considered as acceptable with implementation of mitigation measures.
11.9.3 Residual Visual Impact in Construction Phase
11.9.3.1 VSR R1 - There will be moderate impact on Residents of Villages along Man Kam To Road due to construction works and its relevant of Sha Ling Road and the proposed two entrance will slightly change the appearance of existing villages.
11.9.3.2 VSR R2 - There will be moderate impact on Residents of San Uk Ling due to the proposed road widening of Lin Ma Hang Road and its sensitivity is relatively high.
11.9.3.3 VSR R6 - There will be moderate impact on Residents of Muk Wu Nga Yiu due to the proposed road widening of Lin Ma Hang Road and its sensitivity is relatively high.
11.9.3.4 VSR T2 - There will be slight impact on Travellers along Man Kam To Road due to upgrading of Sha Ling Road and the proposed two entrances.
11.9.3.5 Other VSRs further away will only have glimpse views to the proposed works area. Therefore, the residual impacts will be slight or insubstantial during construction.
11.9.4 Residual Visual Impact in Operational Phase
11.9.4.1 Residual impacts on VSRs are shown in Table 11.11.
11.9.4.2 Given the natural topography of the site shielding views of proposed development from some of the VSRs, and the distance and location of the some of the VSRs being further away from the development, it is expected adverse residual impacts are to be slight or insubstantial with implementation of appropriate mitigation measures, including greening measures on proposed slope, retaining walls, viaducts and aesthetic design treatment of noise barriers.
11.9.4.3 VSR R1 - There will be moderate impact on Residents of Villages along Man Kam To Road due to upgrading of Sha Ling Road and the proposed two entrance will slightly change the appearance of existing villages. After the proposed mitigation measures, it is considered that the residual impact on this VSR can be reduced to slight at Day 1 and Year 10 operation.
11.9.4.4 VSR R2 - There will be moderate impact on Residents of San Uk Ling due to the proposed road widening of Lin Ma Hang Road. After the proposed mitigation measures, it is considered that the residual impact on this VSR can be reduced to slight at Day 1 and insubstantial in Year 10 operation.
11.9.4.5 VSR R6 - There will be moderate impact on Residents of Muk Wu Nga Yiu due to the proposed road widening of Lin Ma Hang Road. After the proposed mitigation measures, it is considered that the residual impact on this VSR can be reduced to slight at Day 1 and insubstantial in Year 10 operation.
11.9.4.6 VSR T2 - There will be slight impact on Travellers along Man Kam To Road due to upgrading of Sha Ling Road and the proposed two entrance. After the proposed mitigation measures, it is considered that the residual impact on this VSR can be reduced to insubstantial at Day 1 and Year 10 operation.
11.9.4.7 Other VSRs further away will only have glimpse views to the proposed works area. Therefore, the residual impacts will be slight or insubstantial during construction.
11.9.4.8 The major source of visual impacts will be the proposed road widening works with noise barriers and the viaduct section. Although the site formation works of the proposed platform will cause changes on the landform, the existing topography will block most of the view to the VSRs. Some portion of the proposed viaduct will be visible from the villages along Man Kam To Road (i.e.VSR R1), however, the visible scale of the viaduct will be relatively small due to the location and existing vegetation (Figure 11.7.7 from VP7). As regards road widening works and installation of noise barriers, mitigation measures will include aesthetic design treatment of noise barriers, roadsides amenity strip and paving design. Due to the natural topography of the site shielding views of proposed development from some of the VSRs, location of some of the VSRs being further away from the development, and the few number of residents, the impact significant threshold after mitigation is expected to be slight to insubstantial overall.
11.9.4.9 VP1 from Sha Ling Road can represent the closest view from VSR R1 and T2. The VSRs within this area are in general have good existing view. Although the receivers will have a partial view towards the proposed road entrance, it will not cause major changes on the exiting roadside view.
11.9.4.10 VP2 from Man Kam To Road can represent the closest view from VSR R1 and T2 towards the proposed western entrance. The VSRs within this area are in general having good existing view. Although the receivers will have a partial view towards the proposed road entrance, it will not cause major changes on the exiting roadside view.
11.9.4.11 VP3 from San Uk Ling can represent the view from the overall western. The VSRs within this area are in general far away from the proposed works, it will not cause major changes on the exiting open rural view.
11.9.4.12 VP4 from MacIntosh Fort can represent the overall view from a high level point towards most of the site. Although this view can see the overall appearance of the works and the changes of landform, there is no key VSR at this area.
11.9.4.13 VP5 from villages along foothill of Tai Shek Mo can represent the overall view from the eastern side. The VSRs within this area are in general far away from the proposed works, with more than 1100m. The existing landform and vegetation will fully blocked the proposed development, it will not cause major changes on the exiting open rural view.
11.9.4.14 VP6 from San Uk Ling towards Lin Ma Hang Road can represent the view for the overall appearance of road widening section at the western side.
11.9.4.15 VP7 from residential area at the foothill in the eastern side of Sandy Ridge represents the closest view of the proposed viaduct. However, the existing site condition would block the view of the proposed viaduct, and its associated retaining wall structure would not cause major change to and blockage of the existing view.
11.10.1.1 The proposed development and associated works follow in principle the planning intentions from the Approved Man Kam To Outline Zoning Plan (No.S/NE-MKT/2) and Approved Fu Tei Au and Sha Ling Outline Zoning Plan (No.S/NE-FTA/14). The proposed work will not encroach in any Amenity Area (A), Conservation Area (CA), and Country Park (CP). The proposed barging point at Siu Lam will fall within Tuen Mun Outline Zoning Plan (No. S/TM/33), the works area will encroach the future Comprehensive Development Area (CDA) and Open Space (O), however, those zoning areas are not developed yet and the existing landscape value is considered to be low.
11.10.1.2 The layout of the proposed works has been optimised to minimize the
impact on existing trees. However, the need for the construction works
including site formation, road works, slope works and other ancillary works
would inevitably affect a number of trees, and their proposed treatments are
elaborated below.
11.10.1.3 The alignment of Sha Ling Road has already be optimized. The columbarium site is composed of platforms at +50mPD and two EVAs which have been carefully designed based on the constraints of natural topography, locations of graves and woodland. There is a constraint that the PDA at +50mPD would require an access directly from Sha Ling Road at the same level. Therefore, at this area, Sha Ling Road would need to attain a level of +50mPD.
11.10.1.4 On the other hand, since there are private lots in the existing Sha
Ling Village near Man Kam To Road, the existing run-in has to be maintained as
access to these lots and thus the road profile of this section of Sha Ling Road
from +12.3mPD to +20mPD has to be kept unchanged. After attaining the level of
+20mPD, Sha Ling Road has to be risen to a level of +50mPD for an elevation
difference of 30m within a horizontal distance of about 430m in order to access
the platform of PDA. This means this section of Sha Ling Road could only be
constructed to a gradient of about 7.5%. Based upon the above constraints and
with the consideration of minimizing the Cut and Fill volume, the alignment of
Sha Ling Road has been optimized. Based upon the above constraints and with the
consideration of minimizing the Cut and Fill volume, the alignment of Sha Ling
Road has been optimized.
11.10.1.5 The Lin Ma Hang Road improvement is to bring up the existing road to a 7.3m wide 2-lane carriageway with 2m footpath at both sides. To minimize the impact to the existing residences and commercial activities, the proposed widened Lin Ma Hang Road was designed and optimized to minimize the impact to the existing roadside slopes, structures and private lots.
11.10.1.6 The proposed site formation layout and the road works alignment have been optimised and minimise the impact on the existing trees, with consideration on the engineering feasibility, and land resumption issues.
11.10.1.7 As the principle of the project is minimizing the site formation works and the affecting trees, limited land will be available for tree planting. It is expected approximately 200 light standard sized trees will be planted as compensatory tree planting at proposed slope with gentler than 35 degree. Approximately 10 to 15 nos. of heavy standard sized trees will be planted as compensatory tree planting along Lin Ma Hang Road and approximately 130 nos. of heavy standard sized trees will be planted within Sandy Ridge. In addition, woodland mix species whips will be proposed along the hillsides for the woodland compensation. In addition, approximately 16,000 nos. of whips will be planted along the hillsides to create the woodland habitat. The overall residual impact on trees is considered as acceptable with mitigation measures.
11.10.1.8 The proposed works will cause slight adverse landscape impact on the Hillside Woodland Distribute at Valley and along the toe of Upland (LR1.1 and LR1.2), Hillside Shrubby Grassland (LR2.1 and 2.2), and some portion of Plantation (LR19) and relevant upland and hillside landscape character area within the development site (LCA1) after appropriate mitigation measures are implemented. The mitigation measures include large amount of woodland mix species whips planted along the hillsides, and grass hydroseeding and climbers planting to compensate the lost greenery. In addition, landscape design treatment will also be implemented on the platform while the columbarium buildings and facilities are being built, the overall landscape aesthetic value would be enhanced. Therefore, it is considered that the overall residual landscape impact at Year 10 operation is acceptable with mitigation measures.
11.10.1.9 The proposed site formation work is far away from existing residential uses, and building blocks of the worst case scenario which would be under other project scopes, it is considered that the proposed works will only cause small to negligible visual impact to most of the VSRs. Only the VSRs located close to the Sha Ling Road upgrading road section will suffer more visual impact. It is considered that the residual visual impact at Year 10 operation is acceptable with mitigation measures.
11.10.1.10 The proposed barging point at Siu Lam is currently used by Express Rail Link project, and the baseline condition of such area remained unchanged. Considered that the landscape and visual impact of the area has been assessed in the approved EIA report (AEIAR-143/2009), the landscape and visual impact of the proposed barging point is acceptable with mitigation measures applied.
11.10.1.11 The landscape and visual impact assessment has been conducted according to the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessing impacts as stated in Annex 10 and 18 of the TM-EIAO, it is considered that the identified residual impacts, taking account of both importance and degree of compliance, will be acceptable with mitigation measures.
[11-1] Construction of a
Secondary Boundary Fence and New Sections of Primary Boundary Fence and Patrol
Road, AEIAR-136/2009
[11-2] Development
of Organic Waste Treatment Facilities Phase II, AEIAR-180/2013
[11-3] PlanD (2010), Land Use Planning
for the Closed Area ¡V Feasibility Study
[11-4] North East New Territories New Development Areas, AEIAR-175/2013
[11-5] HyD (2014), Widening of 2 Sections of Lin Ma Hang Road (Sections between Ping Yuen River and between Tsung Yuen Ha and Lin Ma Hang)
[11-6] Shenzhen River Regulation Project Stage III - Environmental Impact Assessment, AEIAR-035/2000
[11-7] Hong Kong Section of Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail Link, AEIAR-143/2009